Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Back to ISAWE Scenarios
Contents
0%
arthroplasty

Aseptic Loosening of Total Hip Arthroplasty

advanced
6 min
20 marks
6 questions
Clinical Scenario
A 72-year-old male presents with progressive left groin and thigh pain 12 years after uncemented THA for osteoarthritis. Pain is activity-related with start-up pain and is now limiting walking to 100m. He denies fevers or systemic symptoms. CRP is 3 mg/L (normal). Radiographs show extensive osteolysis around both components.
AP pelvis radiograph showing left THA with progressive radiolucent lines around acetabular component (DeLee-Charnley zones 1-3), cup migration superolaterally, and femoral subsidence with cement mantle fracture. Gruen zone involvement visible.
Open Full Size

AP pelvis radiograph showing left THA with progressive radiolucent lines around acetabular component (DeLee-Charnley zones 1-3), cup migration superolaterally, and femoral subsidence with cement mantle fracture. Gruen zone involvement visible.

Source: Metallosis after Exchange of the Femoral Head and Liner following Ceramic Acetabular Liner Dissociation • PMC5014961 • CC-BY

Questions

Question 1 (3 marks)

Describe the radiographic zones used to assess THA loosening and their clinical significance.

Question 2 (4 marks)

This patient has significant acetabular bone loss. Describe the Paprosky acetabular classification and how it guides reconstruction.

Question 3 (4 marks)

The femoral stem is loose with proximal bone loss. Describe the Paprosky femoral classification and reconstruction options.

Question 4 (3 marks)

What are the indications and technique for Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO)?

Question 5 (3 marks)

What factors determine the choice between cemented and uncemented revision components?

Question 6 (3 marks)

What preoperative planning is essential for complex revision THA?

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Must Mention

  • •EXCLUDE INFECTION before any aseptic revision
  • •Paprosky classification guides reconstruction choice
  • •Aim for 50-70% host bone contact for ingrowth
  • •ETO for removal of well-fixed stems or cemented stems
  • •CT essential for bone stock assessment
  • •Have backup options available

Common Pitfalls

  • •Revising without excluding infection
  • •Underestimating bone loss on X-ray
  • •Not having backup implant options
  • •Inadequate preoperative planning
  • •Missing pelvic discontinuity
Scenario Info
Answers Revealed0/6
Difficulty
advanced
Time Allowed6 min
Total Marks20
Questions6