Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Anterior Ankle Impingement

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Anterior Ankle Impingement

Comprehensive guide to anterior ankle impingement diagnosis and management for FRCS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

ANTERIOR ANKLE IMPINGEMENT

Footballer's Ankle | Anterior Osteophytes

AnteriorTibial and talar osteophytes
AthletesEspecially footballers
DF lossLimited dorsiflexion
ArthroscopyGold standard treatment

Types

Bony
PatternOsteophytes
TreatmentTibial, talar spurs
Soft Tissue
PatternSynovitis, capsule
TreatmentImpinging soft tissue
Combined
PatternBoth elements
TreatmentMost common presentation

Critical Must-Knows

  • Anterior tibial and talar osteophytes cause mechanical block
  • Footballer's ankle = repeated dorsiflexion microtrauma
  • Pain at end-range dorsiflexion is characteristic
  • Lateral radiograph shows anterior spurs
  • Arthroscopic debridement is treatment of choice

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Soccer and Australian Football common sports
  • "
    Pain with kicking, squatting, stairs
  • "
    Local anesthetic injection can confirm diagnosis
  • "
    Excellent outcomes with arthroscopic debridement

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Critical Anterior Ankle Impingement Exam Points

Mechanism

Repeated dorsiflexion causes microtrauma to anterior capsule and periosteum. Traction spurs develop on distal tibia and talar neck. These impinge at end-range dorsiflexion.

Clinical Features

Anterior ankle pain at end-range dorsiflexion. Pain with squatting, stairs, kicking. Loss of dorsiflexion range. Tenderness at anterior joint line.

Imaging

Lateral weight-bearing X-ray shows anterior tibial and talar spurs. CT quantifies size. MRI for soft tissue impingement. X-ray may underestimate extent.

Treatment

Conservative: Activity modification, physiotherapy, injection. Surgical: Arthroscopic resection of osteophytes and soft tissue. Excellent outcomes.

Mnemonic

SPURAnterior Impingement Features

S
Spurs (tibial and talar)
Anterior osteophytes
P
Pain at end dorsiflexion
Characteristic symptom
U
Uphill activities worsen
Squatting, stairs, kicking
R
Resect arthroscopically
Treatment of choice

Memory Hook:SPUR = Spurs cause Pain, worse Uphill, Resect arthroscopically!

Mnemonic

KICKAnterior Impingement Exam Findings

K
Kicking causes pain
Repeated dorsiflexion microtrauma
I
Impingement test positive
Forced dorsiflexion reproduces pain
C
Compare dorsiflexion
Reduced ROM vs contralateral
K
Key tenderness anterior
Over anterior joint line

Memory Hook:KICK ball = anterior ankle pain - check with impingement test!

Mnemonic

SAFEArthroscopy Portal Safety

S
Superficial peroneal nerve
Lateral portal risk - transilluminate
A
Anterolateral portal first
Standard primary portal
F
Full joint distension
Improves visualization and safety
E
EHL/EDL interval medially
Protects dorsalis pedis

Memory Hook:SAFE portals prevent nerve injury!

Overview

Anterior ankle impingement refers to pain and limited dorsiflexion caused by impingement of structures at the anterior ankle, typically bony spurs and/or hypertrophic soft tissue. It is also known as "footballer's ankle" due to its association with kicking sports.

Epidemiology

  • Prevalence: 20-40% of ankle injuries in athletes involve impingement syndromes
  • Demographics: Peak incidence in athletes aged 20-35 years
  • Sports: Soccer, Australian Rules Football, ballet, basketball, and rugby most commonly affected
  • Sex distribution: Male predominance (2:1) reflecting sports participation patterns

Classification (Scranton and McDermott)

GradeDescriptionTreatment
ISynovial impingement onlyConservative
IIOsteophyte ≤3mmConservative/Arthroscopy
IIIOsteophyte 3-5mmArthroscopic debridement
IVOsteophyte greater than 5mm or secondary arthritisArthroscopic +/- open

Pathophysiology

Mechanism of Injury

Bony Impingement (Primary):

  • Repeated forced dorsiflexion (kicking) causes microtrauma to the anterior capsule and periosteal insertion
  • Traction osteophytes develop on the anterior distal tibia and dorsal talar neck
  • These "kissing spurs" impinge at end-range dorsiflexion, causing mechanical block and pain
  • Direct impaction theory: Repeated ball strikes cause direct trauma to anterior ankle

Soft Tissue Impingement (Secondary):

  • Hypertrophic synovium or capsule, particularly after ankle sprains
  • Bassett's lesion: Accessory fascicle of AITFL (anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament)
  • Meniscoid lesions: Hypertrophic synovial folds trapped in joint
  • Scar tissue from previous injury or surgery

Anatomical Considerations

Anterior Tibiotalar Recess:

  • The anterior joint line is the most common site of pathology
  • Space between tibial plafond and talar dome decreases with dorsiflexion
  • Normal clearance of 3-5mm reduces to less than 1mm with maximal dorsiflexion

At-Risk Structures:

  • Anterior tibial osteophyte (most common)
  • Talar neck osteophyte
  • Anterior joint capsule
  • Extensor retinaculum
  • Deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery (surgical consideration)

Pathological Sequence

  1. Acute phase: Capsular stretch and periosteal reaction from repetitive microtrauma
  2. Inflammatory phase: Synovitis and capsular thickening
  3. Proliferative phase: Osteophyte formation at capsular insertions
  4. Chronic phase: Established osteophytes with secondary soft tissue changes

Clinical Presentation

History

Athletes, particularly footballers (soccer, Australian rules), present with anterior ankle pain. Pain is worse with activities requiring dorsiflexion: squatting, going uphill, climbing stairs, kicking. There may be a history of previous ankle sprains. Patients note limitation of dorsiflexion compared to the other side.

Examination

Inspection:

  • Mild anterior swelling may be visible
  • Compare to contralateral ankle
  • Note any previous surgical scars

Tenderness: At the anterior joint line, over the anterior tibiotalar joint. Palpate in slight plantarflexion to access anterior structures.

Dorsiflexion Limitation: Reduced compared to contralateral side. Measure with goniometer if available. End-range dorsiflexion reproduces pain.

Impingement Test: Passive forced dorsiflexion reproduces anterior pain. A positive test strongly suggests anterior impingement.

Squeeze Test: Assess syndesmosis by compressing fibula against tibia at mid-calf level. Pain suggests syndesmotic injury rather than pure anterior impingement.

Effusion: May have mild effusion. Palpate anterior recesses.

Exclude Instability: Check for lateral ligament laxity if history of sprains using anterior drawer test and talar tilt.

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

Plain Radiographs (First-line):

  • Lateral weight-bearing: Essential view - shows anterior tibial osteophyte and talar neck spur
  • AP mortise view: Assess syndesmosis and joint space
  • Oblique views: May reveal lateral osteophytes missed on true lateral
  • Limitations: May underestimate spur size as lesions often lateral to midline

CT Scan:

  • Indications: Surgical planning, quantify osteophyte size and location
  • Better 3D assessment of kissing osteophytes
  • Identifies lateral and posteromedial spurs missed on X-ray
  • Essential for large Grade III-IV lesions

MRI:

  • Indications: Suspected soft tissue impingement, associated pathology
  • T2-weighted sequences show synovitis, effusion, bone marrow edema
  • Identifies Bassett's lesion (accessory AITFL fascicle)
  • Detects meniscoid lesions and capsular thickening
  • Evaluates for osteochondral lesions (OCL) of talus

Diagnostic Injection

Technique:

  • Fluoroscopic or ultrasound-guided injection
  • 2-3ml of local anesthetic (lidocaine/bupivacaine) into anterior recess
  • Pain relief confirms diagnosis
  • Can combine with steroid for therapeutic effect

Interpretation:

  • Greater than 50% pain relief = positive diagnostic test
  • Complete relief differentiates from other causes (OCD, arthritis)
  • Duration of relief guides prognosis

Differential Diagnosis

ConditionKey Distinguishing Features
OCD talar domeDeep joint pain, catching, MRI findings
Ankle arthritisGlobal pain, weight-bearing symptoms
Syndesmosis injurySqueeze test positive, high ankle pain
Peroneal pathologyLateral symptoms, peroneal provocation tests
Sinus tarsi syndromeSubtalar instability, sinus tarsi tenderness

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Anterior Ankle Impingement
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Anterior Ankle ImpingementCredit: OrthoVellum

Initial Conservative Management (Grade I-II)

Activity Modification:

  • Avoid provocative activities (kicking, squatting, climbing)
  • Temporary cessation of sport (2-4 weeks initially)
  • May need to modify training or position

Pharmacological Management:

  • NSAIDs for pain and inflammation (short course)
  • Topical anti-inflammatory agents

Physiotherapy Protocol:

  • Phase 1 (Weeks 1-2): Reduce inflammation, maintain ROM

    • Ankle mobilization avoiding end-range dorsiflexion
    • Calf stretching (gastrocnemius and soleus)
    • Isometric strengthening
  • Phase 2 (Weeks 3-6): Restore ROM and strength

    • Progressive dorsiflexion stretching
    • Closed chain exercises
    • Balance and proprioception training
  • Phase 3 (Weeks 6-12): Sport-specific rehabilitation

    • Plyometrics and agility
    • Progressive return to running
    • Sport-specific drills

Adjunctive Treatments:

  • Heel raise (5-10mm) in shoe to reduce dorsiflexion demand
  • Orthotics with heel lift for symptomatic relief
  • Taping for proprioceptive feedback

Corticosteroid Injection:

  • Fluoroscopic or ultrasound-guided anterior joint injection
  • 1ml betamethasone (or equivalent) with 2ml local anesthetic
  • Provides diagnostic confirmation and temporary relief
  • Can repeat once if good response

Conservative treatment is appropriate for Grade I-II lesions and as first-line for all grades. Success rates of 40-60% reported for mild cases.

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications:

  • Failed conservative treatment for 3-6 months
  • Grade III-IV lesions with mechanical block
  • Significant functional impairment in athletes

Relative Indications:

  • Athletes requiring rapid return to sport
  • Recurrent symptoms despite conservative care
  • Combined pathology requiring surgical intervention

Arthroscopic Technique (Gold Standard)

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine with thigh support
  • Heel at edge of table for maximal access
  • Noninvasive distraction device

Portal Placement:

  • Anteromedial portal: Medial to tibialis anterior tendon
  • Anterolateral portal: Lateral to peroneus tertius tendon
  • Mark superficial peroneal nerve by transillumination

Surgical Steps:

  1. Joint insufflation with 20-30ml saline
  2. Anterolateral portal established first
  3. Diagnostic arthroscopy - assess osteophytes and soft tissue
  4. Anteromedial portal under direct visualization
  5. Synovectomy of anterior gutter
  6. Resection of tibial osteophyte using burr/shaver
  7. Resection of talar neck osteophyte
  8. Assess adequacy - check dorsiflexion range intraoperatively
  9. Address associated pathology (OCD, loose bodies)

Key Technical Pearls:

  • Remove ALL visible osteophyte - incomplete resection leads to recurrence
  • Protect articular cartilage during resection
  • Assess lateral and posteromedial spurs (often missed)
  • Check impingement-free dorsiflexion before closure

Open Technique

Indications:

  • Very large osteophytes (greater than 10mm)
  • Significant hardware requiring removal
  • Surgeon preference or equipment limitations

Approach:

  • Anterior ankle incision between EHL and EDL tendons
  • Protect deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery
  • Direct visualization of pathology

Outcomes: Similar to arthroscopic but longer recovery (6-8 weeks vs 4-6 weeks).

Rehabilitation Protocol Post-Surgery

Week 0-2:

  • Weight bearing as tolerated in walking boot
  • Ankle ROM exercises (non-aggressive)
  • Ice and elevation
  • Wound care

Week 2-6:

  • Wean from boot to supportive shoe
  • Progressive ROM including dorsiflexion
  • Strengthening exercises
  • Stationary cycling

Week 6-12:

  • Sport-specific rehabilitation
  • Running progression
  • Plyometrics
  • Return to training with restrictions

Week 12+:

  • Full return to sport when criteria met
  • Most athletes return by 12-16 weeks

Outcome Measures

OutcomeRate
Good/Excellent results85-95%
Return to previous sport level90-94%
Mean time to sport10-14 weeks
Patient satisfactionGreater than 90%
Recurrence rate5-10%

Prognostic Factors

Favorable Prognosis:

  • Isolated anterior impingement without arthritis
  • Pure soft tissue impingement (Grade I)
  • Younger athletic patients
  • Short symptom duration (less than 1 year)
  • No associated cartilage damage

Poor Prognosis:

  • Grade IV with secondary arthritis
  • Significant cartilage damage
  • Chronic symptoms greater than 2 years
  • Worker's compensation claims
  • Previous surgery
  • Combined ankle instability

Long-Term Results

10-Year Follow-Up Data:

  • 80-85% maintain good outcomes
  • Recurrence rate 5-10% requiring revision
  • Development of arthritis in 10-15% (especially Grade IV)
  • Higher failure rates in professional vs recreational athletes

Australian-Specific Considerations

Typical Recovery Timeline (Australian context):

  • Return to office work: 1-2 weeks
  • Return to manual work: 4-6 weeks
  • Return to contact sport: 12-16 weeks

This timeline aligns with Australian sports medicine practice guidelines and AFL/NRL return to play protocols.

Complications

Complications of Anterior Ankle Impingement

Untreated Complications:

  • Progressive loss of dorsiflexion (functional decline)
  • Chronic pain affecting athletic performance and daily activities
  • Compensatory gait abnormalities leading to proximal symptoms
  • Secondary ankle arthritis from altered joint mechanics

Surgical Complications

General Complications:

  • Infection (less than 1% for arthroscopic procedures)
  • Deep vein thrombosis (rare in young athletic population)
  • Wound healing issues (particularly with open approach)

Procedure-Specific Complications:

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Superficial peroneal nerve injury2-5%Careful portal placement, transillumination
Deep peroneal nerve injuryLess than 1%Avoid excessive medial traction
Dorsalis pedis injuryRareLateral portal placement
Recurrence5-10%Complete resection, address all pathology
Stiffness2-3%Early mobilization, physiotherapy
Incomplete relief10-15%Patient selection, manage expectations

Portal-Specific Nerve Anatomy

Neurovascular Safety

The superficial peroneal nerve crosses the anterolateral ankle ~6.5cm proximal to the lateral malleolus. Always identify by transillumination before portal placement. The dorsalis pedis artery lies between the EHL and EDL tendons medially.

Anteromedial Portal: Risk to saphenous nerve/vein and medial branch of superficial peroneal nerve

Anterolateral Portal: Risk to superficial peroneal nerve (most common injury)

Risk Factors for Poor Outcome

  • Grade IV lesions with secondary arthritis
  • Cartilage damage (OCD lesions)
  • Significant ankle instability
  • Worker's compensation claims
  • Prolonged symptoms greater than 2 years pre-surgery

Evidence Base

III
📚 Tol et al
Key Findings:
  • Arthroscopic treatment outcomes
  • 87% good/excellent results
  • Athletes return to sport
  • Low complication rate
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic debridement is effective treatment.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001

III
📚 van Dijk et al
Key Findings:
  • Classification of anterior impingement
  • Arthroscopic findings correlated with outcomes
  • Technique described
  • Foundation for modern treatment
Clinical Implication: Established arthroscopic treatment as gold standard.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997

IV
📚 Scranton and McDermott
Key Findings:
  • Grading system for anterior impingement
  • Grade I-IV based on osteophyte size
  • Treatment algorithm proposed
  • Outcomes correlated with grade
Clinical Implication: Classification guides treatment selection - Grades I-II may respond to conservative management, Grades III-IV require surgery.
Source: Am J Sports Med 1992

III
📚 Walsh et al
Key Findings:
  • Return to sport following arthroscopic debridement
  • 94% returned to pre-injury level
  • Mean 12 weeks to full activity
  • Minimal complications
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic treatment allows rapid return to sport for athletes with anterior impingement.
Source: Foot Ankle Int 2004

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Footballer's Ankle

EXAMINER

"A 25-year-old soccer player has anterior ankle pain that limits his ability to kick. Pain is worse going up stairs. How do you assess and manage him?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation of anterior ankle pain in a soccer player worse with dorsiflexion activities is classic for anterior ankle impingement, also known as footballer's ankle. My history would confirm pain location (anterior joint line), aggravating activities (kicking, squatting, stairs), duration, and previous injuries. On examination, I would assess for tenderness at the anterior joint line, reduced dorsiflexion compared to the other side, and pain at end-range dorsiflexion. I would check lateral ligament stability if there is a history of sprains. I would obtain weight-bearing lateral radiographs which would show anterior tibial and talar osteophytes. CT may better define the extent of spurs for surgical planning. The pathophysiology involves repeated dorsiflexion microtrauma causing traction osteophytes that impinge at end-range. For management, I would trial conservative treatment first with activity modification, physiotherapy for stretching and strengthening, and consider corticosteroid injection which also confirms the diagnosis. However, given he is an athlete wanting to return to sport, if conservative measures fail I would recommend arthroscopic debridement. This involves resecting the anterior tibial and talar osteophytes and debriding any impinging soft tissue. Outcomes are excellent with greater than 85% good results and most return to sport.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Footballer's ankle = anterior impingement
Pain at end-range dorsiflexion
Lateral X-ray shows anterior spurs
Arthroscopic debridement is gold standard
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not examining dorsiflexion range
✗Forgetting to check lateral stability
✗Not knowing arthroscopic treatment
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the mechanism of anterior impingement?"
"What are the complications of arthroscopic treatment?"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 2: Surgical Complications

EXAMINER

"You are performing ankle arthroscopy for anterior impingement debridement. Describe your portal placement and how you would avoid neurovascular injury."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would position the patient supine with the foot at the end of the table to allow unrestricted access. I would use a thigh holder for support. Before marking portals, I would dorsiflex the ankle and mark the superficial peroneal nerve by transillumination - it typically crosses the ankle approximately 6.5cm proximal to the lateral malleolus. I would establish the anterolateral portal first, as this is my primary viewing portal. This is placed lateral to the peroneus tertius tendon, typically at the level of the joint line. The risk here is the superficial peroneal nerve, so I make a vertical skin incision only, then bluntly dissect to the capsule. I would insufflate the joint with 20-30ml saline to distend it. I then establish the anteromedial portal under direct visualization, medial to the tibialis anterior tendon. This protects the saphenous nerve and vein medially, and the dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve which lie between EHL and EDL. Key safety principles include: always making skin incisions only with the blade, then blunt dissection; using a non-invasive distraction device rather than pins; maintaining joint distension; and direct visualization for all portal placement after the first. Postoperatively, I would counsel patients about the 2-5% risk of superficial peroneal nerve neurapraxia, which is usually temporary.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Transilluminate to identify superficial peroneal nerve
Anterolateral portal first as viewing portal
Anteromedial under direct visualization
Skin incision only then blunt dissection
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not identifying superficial peroneal nerve preoperatively
✗Making portals without joint distension
✗Using blade for deep dissection
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is Bassett's lesion?"
"How do you manage nerve injury if it occurs?"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 3: Recurrent Impingement

EXAMINER

"A patient returns 18 months after arthroscopic debridement with recurrent anterior ankle pain. How do you approach this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Recurrence after anterior impingement surgery occurs in 5-10% of cases. My approach would begin with a thorough re-evaluation. History: I would determine if symptoms are identical to before surgery, if there was a symptom-free interval, and whether there was any new injury. Examination: I would assess for dorsiflexion range, anterior tenderness, and signs of instability. Repeat imaging is essential - lateral weight-bearing X-ray to assess for osteophyte regrowth, and I would obtain CT to quantify residual or recurrent osteophytes. MRI would help assess for chondral damage or other pathology that may have been missed initially. Causes of recurrence include: incomplete initial resection of osteophytes, development of new osteophytes, missed lateral or posteromedial spurs, underlying ankle instability contributing to recurrent impingement, and development of secondary arthritis. Management depends on findings. If there is identifiable recurrent impingement with preserved joint space, revision arthroscopic debridement can be successful with 70-80% good outcomes. Key technical points include addressing all osteophytes including lateral gutters and ensuring complete resection under direct visualization. If there is significant arthritis, I would discuss ankle arthrodesis or arthroplasty options depending on patient factors.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recurrence rate 5-10%
Repeat CT to quantify residual osteophytes
Common cause is incomplete initial resection
Revision arthroscopy effective for isolated recurrence
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not reassessing for underlying instability
✗Missing development of secondary arthritis
✗Assuming same diagnosis without reinvestigation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the outcomes of revision surgery?"
"When would you consider ankle arthrodesis?"

MCQ Practice Points

Footballer's Ankle

Q: What is footballer's ankle? A: Anterior ankle impingement from repeated dorsiflexion causing anterior tibial and talar osteophytes. Common in soccer and Australian Rules football.

Treatment

Q: What is the treatment of choice for anterior ankle impingement? A: Arthroscopic debridement of osteophytes and impinging soft tissue. Greater than 85% good/excellent outcomes.

Nerve at Risk

Q: What nerve is most at risk during anterior ankle arthroscopy? A: Superficial peroneal nerve - crosses 6.5cm proximal to lateral malleolus. Identify by transillumination before portal placement.

Bassett's Lesion

Q: What is Bassett's lesion? A: Accessory distal fascicle of the AITFL that can impinge on the anterolateral talar dome with dorsiflexion and cause soft tissue anterior impingement.

Classification

Q: What classification is used for anterior ankle impingement? A: Scranton and McDermott classification - Grade I (synovial only), Grade II (less than 3mm spur), Grade III (3-5mm spur), Grade IV (greater than 5mm or arthritis).

Portal Placement

Q: What is the standard portal sequence for anterior ankle arthroscopy? A: Anterolateral first (viewing portal), then anteromedial under direct vision (working portal). Both portals are at joint line level.

Australian Context

Anterior ankle impingement is particularly common in Australian athletes due to high participation in Australian Rules Football and soccer. The AFL has recognized this as a significant injury pattern, with 2-3% of players affected annually across elite competitions.

Arthroscopic ankle surgery is widely available across Australia, with fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons in all major metropolitan centers and increasingly in regional areas. Management follows international best practice with emphasis on conservative treatment first, followed by arthroscopic debridement for recalcitrant cases.

Australian sports medicine guidelines emphasize structured return-to-play protocols following ankle surgery. Most AFL and NRL players follow a graduated rehabilitation program with return to full training at 8-12 weeks and match play by 12-16 weeks. Key clearance criteria include full pain-free dorsiflexion, less than 10% strength deficit, and completion of sport-specific functional testing.

Australian researchers have contributed significantly to understanding and treating anterior ankle impingement, particularly regarding surgical outcomes and return-to-sport protocols in elite football codes.

ANTERIOR ANKLE IMPINGEMENT

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Facts

  • •Footballer's ankle
  • •Anterior tibial and talar spurs
  • •Repeated dorsiflexion microtrauma
  • •Pain at end-range dorsiflexion

Diagnosis

  • •Lateral weight-bearing X-ray
  • •CT for spur detail
  • •MRI for soft tissue
  • •Injection confirms diagnosis

Treatment

  • •Conservative: Activity mod, physio, injection
  • •Surgical: Arthroscopic debridement
  • •Greater than 85% good/excellent outcomes
  • •Most return to sport
Quick Stats
Reading Time61 min
Related Topics

Ankle Impingement Syndromes

Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture

Baxter's Nerve Entrapment

Bunionette Deformity (Tailor's Bunion)