Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Comprehensive guide to anterior interosseous syndrome including OK sign weakness, isolated motor palsy, and surgical treatment options.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

ANTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS SYNDROME

Pure Motor Branch of Median Nerve | No Sensory Loss | OK Sign Weakness

Pure MotorNo sensory symptoms
3-6 monthsObservation period
60-70%Spontaneous recovery rate
OK SignDiagnostic test

Clinical Severity

Mild
PatternWeakness without atrophy
TreatmentObservation for 3-6 months
Moderate
PatternProgressive weakness
TreatmentConsider EMG/NCS, continue observation
Severe
PatternMuscle atrophy or no recovery at 6 months
TreatmentSurgical exploration

Critical Must-Knows

  • Pure Motor Palsy: NO sensory loss distinguishes AIS from median nerve compression
  • OK Sign Test: Cannot make circle with thumb IP and index DIP - both remain extended
  • Muscles Affected: FPL, FDP to index (and middle), pronator quadratus only
  • Natural History: 60-70% recover spontaneously within 6 months - observe first
  • Compression Site: Usually between two heads of pronator teres or fibrous bands

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    No sensory loss = AIN syndrome not median nerve
  • "
    OK sign weakness = FPL + FDP index involvement
  • "
    Pronator quadratus weakness hard to detect clinically
  • "
    Observe 3-6 months before surgery - high spontaneous recovery

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Critical AIS Exam Points

Pure Motor Palsy

Zero sensory loss. If there is ANY sensory involvement, it is NOT isolated AIN syndrome - consider median nerve or pronator syndrome.

OK Sign Test

Cannot pinch with thumb tip and index tip. Both IP joints remain extended forming a pinch pulp-to-pulp instead of tip-to-tip.

Natural History

60-70% recover spontaneously. Observation for 3-6 months is first-line treatment. Do not rush to surgery.

Differential Diagnosis

FPL tendon rupture, FDP rupture, pronator syndrome. Check for sensory loss and palpate tendons to differentiate.

Quick Decision Guide

PresentationLikely DiagnosisTreatmentKey Pearl
Weak OK sign, no sensory loss, recent traumaAcute AIS (traumatic)Observation 3-6 months, EMG at 6 weeks70% recover spontaneously
Weak OK sign, no sensory loss, gradual onsetIdiopathic AISObservation 3-6 months, consider imagingMost common presentation
Weak OK sign with sensory loss palmarPronator syndromeDifferent treatment - may need earlier surgerySensory loss rules out pure AIN
Mnemonic

FPL FDP PQAIN Motor Innervation

F
FPL
Flexor pollicis longus - thumb IP flexion
F
FDP (radial)
FDP to index and middle fingers
P
PQ
Pronator quadratus - forearm pronation

Memory Hook:FPL FDP PQ - The three muscles that make the OK sign work! All motor, zero sensory!

Mnemonic

SENSORYAIS vs Pronator Syndrome Differentiation

S
Sensory ABSENT
AIS has no sensory loss
E
EMG findings
Denervation in FPL, FDP, PQ only
N
No palmar cutaneous
Palmar cutaneous branch normal
S
Separate from median
Branches off median nerve
O
OK sign weak
Cannot pinch tip-to-tip
R
Recovery spontaneous
60-70% resolve without surgery
Y
Years of observation OK
Can observe for up to 12 months

Memory Hook:SENSORY tells you what's missing in AIS - no sensory loss!

Mnemonic

FIBROMACauses of AIS

F
Fracture
Forearm fractures, especially proximal radius
I
Idiopathic
Most common - no identifiable cause
B
Bands/Anomalies
Fibrous bands, accessory muscles (Gantzer)
R
Radial head dislocation
Monteggia fracture-dislocation
O
Overuse/Parsonage-Turner
Neuralgic amyotrophy
M
Mass lesions
Lipoma, ganglion, thrombosed vessels
A
Anomalous muscles
Gantzer's muscle (accessory FPL head)

Memory Hook:FIBROMA - Think of anatomical causes from fractures to masses to anomalies!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why AIS Matters

AIS is the classic pure motor median nerve palsy. Understanding that it has ZERO sensory loss and high spontaneous recovery rate is critical for exam scenarios and preventing unnecessary surgery.

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome is isolated compression or injury of the anterior interosseous nerve, a pure motor branch of the median nerve.

Demographics

  • Age: Any age, peak 30-50 years
  • Sex: No clear gender predilection
  • Bilateral: Rare (suggests systemic cause)
  • Occupational: Can occur with repetitive pronation

Much less common than carpal tunnel syndrome.

Clinical Significance

  • Diagnosis often delayed: Mistaken for tendon rupture
  • High spontaneous recovery: 60-70% within 6 months
  • Pure motor palsy: No sensory loss key to diagnosis
  • Surgical outcomes: Good if selected appropriately

Observation is first-line treatment in most cases.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

AIN Anatomy

The anterior interosseous nerve branches from the median nerve 4-6cm distal to the lateral epicondyle, just AFTER the nerve passes between the two heads of pronator teres. It is a PURE MOTOR branch with zero cutaneous sensory distribution.

Anatomical Course:

  • Origin: Median nerve, 4-6cm distal to lateral epicondyle
  • Course: Descends on anterior surface of interosseous membrane
  • Termination: Pronator quadratus and wrist joint capsule (sensory only to joint)

Motor Innervation (3 muscles only):

  1. Flexor pollicis longus (FPL): Thumb IP flexion
  2. Flexor digitorum profundus to index (and middle): Index and middle DIP flexion
  3. Pronator quadratus (PQ): Forearm pronation (weak clinically)

Common Compression Sites:

  • Between two heads of pronator teres
  • Fibrous bands from deep head of pronator teres
  • Accessory muscles (Gantzer's muscle)
  • Lacertus fibrosus (bicipital aponeurosis)
  • Thrombosed vessels or aberrant radial arteries

Classification Systems

Clinical Severity Classification

GradeClinical FindingsEMG FindingsTreatment
MildWeakness only, no atrophyDenervation in affected musclesObservation 3-6 months
ModerateProgressive weakness, no recovery at 3 monthsOngoing denervationContinue observation to 6 months
SevereMuscle atrophy or no recovery at 6 monthsNo reinnervation potentialsSurgical exploration

Severity guides timing of intervention.

Classification by Cause

TypeExamplesTreatment Approach
TraumaticPost-fracture, dislocationObservation, high recovery rate
CompressiveFibrous bands, massesImaging, consider earlier surgery if mass
Neuralgic AmyotrophyParsonage-Turner syndromeObservation, physical therapy
IdiopathicNo clear cause (most common)Observation 3-6 months

Understanding etiology helps predict recovery.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Onset: Acute (post-trauma) or gradual (idiopathic)
  • Pain: May have initial forearm pain (Parsonage-Turner)
  • Weakness: Difficulty pinching, writing, turning keys
  • No numbness: Critical negative finding
  • Red flags: Sensory loss (not pure AIN), progressive atrophy

Ask specifically about numbness to rule out pronator syndrome.

Examination

  • OK sign test: Cannot make tip-to-tip circle
  • Pinch pattern: Pulp-to-pulp instead of tip-to-tip
  • FPL testing: Isolate thumb IP flexion
  • FDP index testing: Isolate index DIP flexion
  • Sensory exam: MUST be completely normal
  • Tinel's: May be positive over AIN course

Always test sensation to confirm pure motor palsy.

Key Clinical Tests

TestTechniquePositive FindingIndicates
OK SignAsk patient to make circle with thumb and indexExtended IP joints, pulp-to-pulp pinchFPL and FDP index weakness
Isolated FPLStabilize thumb MCP, ask to flex IPWeak or absent IP flexionFPL denervation
Isolated FDP IndexStabilize PIP, ask to flex DIPWeak or absent DIP flexionFDP denervation
Pronator QuadratusResist pronation with elbow flexed 90°Subtle weakness (hard to detect)PQ denervation

Differential Diagnosis

Key differentials: FPL tendon rupture, FDP rupture, pronator syndrome (has sensory loss), high median nerve palsy, neuralgic amyotrophy. Palpate tendons and check sensation carefully.

Investigations

Investigation Protocol

ClinicalFirst Line

Clinical diagnosis based on pure motor palsy affecting FPL, FDP index, and PQ with ZERO sensory loss. OK sign weakness is diagnostic.

BaselineElectrodiagnostics at 6 Weeks

EMG/NCS at 6 weeks post-onset. Denervation potentials in FPL, FDP (radial), and PQ. Normal sensory studies. Helps confirm diagnosis and establish baseline.

ImagingMRI if Indicated

MRI forearm if mass lesion suspected, trauma history, or no recovery at 3 months. May show space-occupying lesion, hematoma, or nerve changes.

Follow-upRepeat EMG at 3-6 Months

Repeat EMG to assess for reinnervation potentials. If no recovery, consider surgical exploration.

Electrodiagnostic Findings:

  • Motor NCS: May be normal (nerve supplies only 3 muscles deep in forearm)
  • Sensory NCS: NORMAL (critical finding)
  • EMG: Denervation potentials (fibrillations, positive sharp waves) in FPL, FDP index/middle, and PQ
  • Follow-up EMG: Reinnervation potentials indicate recovery

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
anterior interosseous syndrome management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for anterior interosseous syndromeCredit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management (First-Line)

Observation Protocol

0-6 WeeksInitial Phase

Observation and activity modification. Avoid heavy gripping and pinching. Baseline EMG at 6 weeks to confirm diagnosis. Hand therapy for ROM.

6 Weeks - 3 MonthsEarly Recovery Phase

Continue observation. Clinical reassessment monthly. Most spontaneous recoveries begin in this period. Maintain ROM exercises.

3-6 MonthsDecision Point

Repeat EMG at 3-4 months. If no clinical or electrical recovery, consider imaging and surgical exploration. If improving, continue observation.

6-12 MonthsLate Recovery Phase

Surgery if no recovery by 6 months. Some advocate waiting up to 12 months if showing gradual improvement. Balance against muscle atrophy risk.

Observation for 3-6 months is standard as most cases recover spontaneously.

Indications for Surgery

Absolute Indications:

  • Mass lesion compressing nerve (ganglion, lipoma)
  • Fracture fragment or bone callus compression
  • No recovery at 6 months observation
  • Progressive muscle atrophy

Relative Indications:

  • Persistent symptoms at 3-6 months with no EMG improvement
  • Patient preference after informed discussion
  • High functional demands requiring earlier intervention

Contraindications to Surgery:

  • Improving clinical function
  • Reinnervation potentials on EMG
  • Systemic neurological disease

Do not rush to surgery given high spontaneous recovery rate.

Surgical Technique

Anterior Interosseous Nerve Exploration

Surgical Steps

1Positioning and Incision

Supine, arm on table, tourniquet. Volar approach, curvilinear incision from 2cm distal to elbow flexion crease extending 10-12cm distally along ulnar border of mobile wad.

2Superficial Dissection

Identify and protect lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Divide lacertus fibrosus. Retract brachioradialis laterally.

3Median Nerve Exposure

Identify median nerve between FDS and FCR. Trace distally to identify pronator teres. Release nerve from between two heads of pronator teres.

4AIN Identification

Identify AIN branching from median nerve 4-6cm distal to epicondyle. Follow nerve distally along interosseous membrane. Release all fibrous bands, anomalous muscles (Gantzer's), or compressing structures.

5Complete Decompression

Release nerve throughout course. Excise any mass lesions. Ensure nerve glides freely. Inspect FPL, FDP, and PQ muscle bellies for atrophy.

6Closure

Layered closure. No drain typically needed. Bulky dressing and forearm splint in neutral position.

Complete decompression from origin to pronator quadratus is essential.

Structures at Risk During Surgery

StructureLocationHow to Protect
Lateral antebrachial cutaneousSuperficial, lateral aspectIdentify and retract carefully
Median nerve properBetween FDS and FCRGentle handling, avoid excessive traction
Radial arteryUnder brachioradialisRetract laterally with mobile wad
AIN itselfSmall caliber nerveAvoid excessive dissection around nerve

The AIN is a small nerve easily injured during dissection.

Common Intraoperative Findings

FindingManagement
Fibrous bands from pronator teresRelease completely
Gantzer's muscle (accessory FPL head)Divide if compressing
Thrombosed aberrant radial arteryLigate and divide
Ganglion or lipomaExcise completely
Normal anatomyNeurolysis only

In idiopathic cases, may find no obvious pathology - neurolysis still beneficial.

Complications

Complications of AIS Surgery

ComplicationIncidenceManagement
Incomplete recovery20-40%Counsel pre-operatively, therapy
Cutaneous nerve injury5-10%Careful dissection, neurolysis if symptomatic
Median nerve injuryRare (under 2%)Prevent with gentle handling
Recurrent compressionRare (under 5%)Ensure complete release
CRPSRareEarly therapy, multidisciplinary care

Incomplete recovery is the most common outcome issue. Counsel patients that surgery aims to prevent further deterioration and allow recovery, but full strength may not return, especially if atrophy is present.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Week 0-2Protection Phase

Forearm splint in neutral position. Wound care. Finger and elbow ROM out of splint. Suture removal at 10-14 days.

Week 2-6Early Mobilization

Discontinue splint. Begin gentle active ROM all joints. Scar massage. No strengthening yet.

Week 6-12Strengthening Phase

Progressive strengthening. Pinch and grip strengthening exercises. Functional activities.

Month 3-12Recovery Assessment

Monitor for nerve recovery. Repeat EMG at 6 months post-op to assess reinnervation. Recovery may take up to 12-18 months.

Return to work: Light duty at 2-4 weeks. Full duty at 8-12 weeks depending on demands and recovery.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Non-Operative Outcomes:

  • Spontaneous recovery: 60-70% within 6 months
  • Time to recovery: Most within 3-6 months, can take up to 12 months
  • Complete recovery: Common in idiopathic and post-traumatic cases
  • Neuralgic amyotrophy: Recovery in 80-90% but may take 18-24 months

Surgical Outcomes:

  • Overall improvement: 70-80% good to excellent results
  • Complete recovery: 50-60% (lower than spontaneous)
  • Partial recovery: 20-30%
  • No improvement: 10-20%

Prognostic Factors:

FactorBetter OutcomeWorse Outcome
CauseTraumatic, mass lesionIdiopathic, neuralgic amyotrophy
DurationShort (under 6 months)Long (over 12 months)
AtrophyAbsentPresent pre-operatively
AgeYoungerElderly

Early surgical decompression for compressive masses has excellent outcomes. Prolonged observation (over 12 months) may lead to irreversible muscle atrophy.

Evidence Base

Case Series
📚 Nagano
Key Findings:
  • 23 patients with AIN syndrome
  • 74% spontaneous recovery
  • Average recovery time 9.3 months
  • Observation first-line for idiopathic cases
Clinical Implication: High spontaneous recovery supports observation as first-line treatment.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1996

Prospective Study
📚 Seror
Key Findings:
  • 17 patients with AIN palsy
  • EMG findings correlate with recovery
  • Reinnervation potentials predict good outcome
  • Serial EMG useful for monitoring
Clinical Implication: EMG is valuable for prognostication and surgical timing.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996

Case Series (Classic)
📚 Spinner and Schreiber
Key Findings:
  • First comprehensive description of AIS
  • Emphasized pure motor nature
  • Described anatomical compression sites
  • Established OK sign as diagnostic test
Clinical Implication: Classic paper establishing AIS as distinct clinical entity.
Source: Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1969

Case Series
📚 Proudman and Menz
Key Findings:
  • 10 patients with surgical decompression
  • 70% good to excellent results
  • Best results with identifiable compressive lesion
  • Idiopathic cases had variable outcomes
Clinical Implication: Surgery effective when specific lesion identified.
Source: J Hand Surg Br 1992

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classic Presentation

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents with 2 months of difficulty pinching objects. He cannot make an 'OK' sign properly. His thumb and index finger IPs remain extended when he tries. Sensation in the hand is completely normal. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a classic presentation of anterior interosseous syndrome - isolated compression of the AIN, a pure motor branch of the median nerve. The inability to make an OK sign indicates weakness of FPL and FDP to the index finger. The critical finding is completely normal sensation, which confirms this is a pure motor palsy, not median nerve or pronator syndrome. My initial management would be observation with activity modification, as 60-70% of AIN palsies recover spontaneously within 3-6 months. I would obtain baseline EMG at 6 weeks to confirm denervation in FPL, FDP index, and pronator quadratus with normal sensory studies. I would follow clinically every 4-6 weeks and repeat EMG at 3-4 months. If no recovery by 6 months, I would obtain MRI and consider surgical exploration.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize OK sign weakness as pathognomonic for AIS
Normal sensation critical to diagnosis
Observation first-line given 60-70% spontaneous recovery
EMG at 6 weeks confirms diagnosis and establishes baseline
COMMON TRAPS
✗Operating immediately without observation period
✗Missing that normal sensation excludes median nerve or pronator syndrome
✗Confusing with FPL tendon rupture - palpate tendon
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What muscles are affected in AIS?"
"At what level does the AIN branch from the median nerve?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Post-Traumatic AIS

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old woman sustained a proximal radius fracture treated non-operatively 8 weeks ago. She now presents with difficulty writing and pinching. Examination shows weak OK sign but normal sensation. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is post-traumatic anterior interosseous syndrome, likely related to the proximal radius fracture - either from initial injury, fracture hematoma, or developing callus. Post-traumatic AIS has a high spontaneous recovery rate, so my approach would still favor observation initially. I would obtain plain radiographs to assess fracture healing and callus formation, and MRI if there is concern for ongoing compression from hematoma or excessive callus. I would obtain EMG at 6 weeks post-injury to confirm AIS and establish baseline. Given the clear traumatic etiology, I would observe for 3-6 months as the fracture consolidates and any hematoma resorbs. If there is a clear compressive lesion on MRI or no recovery by 6 months, I would consider surgical exploration and decompression. I would counsel that recovery may take 6-12 months.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Post-traumatic AIS has high spontaneous recovery rate
Image to identify compressive pathology (hematoma, callus)
Still favor observation unless clear surgical lesion
Fracture healing and hematoma resolution may decompress nerve
COMMON TRAPS
✗Immediate surgery without allowing time for recovery
✗Not imaging to identify treatable compressive lesion
✗Confusing with compartment syndrome - sensation is normal in AIS
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if MRI showed a large ganglion compressing the AIN?"
"How do you differentiate AIS from pronator syndrome?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Persistent AIS at 6 Months

EXAMINER

"A patient with idiopathic AIS has been observed for 6 months with no clinical improvement. Repeat EMG shows persistent denervation with no reinnervation potentials. MRI shows no mass lesion. The patient has visible atrophy of the thenar eminence. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is persistent AIS at 6 months without EMG evidence of recovery, which is an indication for surgical exploration. However, I am concerned about the description of thenar atrophy - this would be unusual in isolated AIS as the thenar muscles (APB, opponens, superficial FPB) are supplied by the recurrent motor branch of the median nerve, not the AIN. I would first clarify the examination - is there true thenar atrophy or is this FPL atrophy which can appear as thenar wasting? If there is true thenar atrophy with APB weakness, this suggests median nerve involvement not isolated AIS, and I would obtain more proximal imaging. Assuming this is FPL atrophy only and confirmed AIS, I would offer surgical exploration and decompression. At surgery, I would expose the median nerve and trace the AIN from its origin through the pronator teres, releasing all fibrous bands and anomalous structures. I would counsel that recovery after 6 months of denervation may be incomplete.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
No recovery at 6 months = surgical indication
Thenar atrophy unusual in AIS - suggests broader median nerve issue
FPL atrophy can mimic thenar wasting - clarify exam
Complete decompression from origin to pronator quadratus
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing thenar atrophy indicates broader problem
✗Incomplete surgical exploration missing proximal compression
✗Promising complete recovery with 6 months of denervation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are common intraoperative findings in idiopathic AIS?"
"What is Gantzer's muscle and why does it matter?"

MCQ Practice Points

Pure Motor Nature

Q: What distinguishes anterior interosseous syndrome from pronator syndrome? A: Zero sensory loss. AIS is a pure motor palsy (AIN has no cutaneous sensory distribution). Pronator syndrome has sensory loss in median nerve distribution because the nerve is compressed proximal to the AIN branching.

OK Sign Test

Q: What does the OK sign test? A: FPL and FDP to index. Inability to make tip-to-tip pinch (thumb IP and index DIP extended) indicates weakness of FPL and FDP index, pathognomonic for AIN palsy.

Spontaneous Recovery Rate

Q: What percentage of AIS cases recover spontaneously? A: 60-70% within 6 months. This high spontaneous recovery rate justifies observation as first-line treatment before considering surgical exploration.

Three Muscles Only

Q: What muscles are innervated by the anterior interosseous nerve? A: FPL, FDP to index (and middle), and pronator quadratus. Only these three muscles - no cutaneous sensation.

Branching Point

Q: Where does the AIN branch from the median nerve? A: 4-6cm distal to the lateral epicondyle. This is just distal to the pronator teres, which is why pronator teres compression can affect AIN.

Gantzer's Muscle

Q: What is Gantzer's muscle? A: Accessory head of FPL. Anatomical variant present in 45-65% of people. Arises from medial epicondyle and can compress the AIN.

Australian Context

Australian Guidelines:

  • EMG/NCS recommended for confirmation before surgical intervention
  • Medicare rebates available for electrodiagnostic studies and surgical decompression
  • Most AIS exploration performed as inpatient procedure

Medicolegal Considerations:

  • Document pure motor nature (zero sensory loss) to confirm diagnosis
  • Obtain informed consent including risk of incomplete recovery
  • Document observation period and rationale for surgery if performed
  • Warn of nerve injury, wound complications, persistent weakness

Workcover/Insurance:

  • May be work-related if associated with forearm trauma or repetitive activities
  • Document occupational history and mechanism
  • Prolonged time off work may be required for recovery (6-12 months)

Australian surgeons should follow RACS guidelines and document consent thoroughly, especially regarding the high spontaneous recovery rate and observation period.

ANTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS SYNDROME

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •AIN = pure motor branch of median nerve
  • •Branches 4-6cm distal to lateral epicondyle
  • •Innervates only 3 muscles: FPL, FDP (index/middle), PQ
  • •Zero cutaneous sensory distribution

Clinical Diagnosis

  • •OK sign weakness = cannot pinch tip-to-tip
  • •Normal sensation = key to diagnosis
  • •FPL and FDP index weakness, PQ weak (hard to test)
  • •EMG: denervation in 3 muscles, normal sensory studies

Differential Diagnosis

  • •Pronator syndrome = has sensory loss (palmar)
  • •FPL tendon rupture = palpable tendon gap
  • •High median nerve palsy = thenar weakness + sensory
  • •Neuralgic amyotrophy = painful onset, shoulder involvement

Natural History

  • •60-70% recover spontaneously within 6 months
  • •Observation first-line treatment
  • •EMG at 6 weeks to confirm diagnosis
  • •Surgery if no recovery by 6 months

Surgical Technique

  • •Volar approach, expose median nerve proximally
  • •Trace AIN from origin distally
  • •Release all fibrous bands and anomalous muscles
  • •Gantzer's muscle common compression site

Outcomes

  • •Non-op: 60-70% full recovery
  • •Post-op: 70-80% good-excellent
  • •Recovery takes 6-12 months
  • •Atrophy portends incomplete recovery
Quick Stats
Reading Time67 min
Related Topics

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome