Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Carpal Instability - DISI/VISI

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Carpal Instability - DISI/VISI

Comprehensive guide to dorsal and volar intercalated segment instability patterns - classification, diagnosis, and management for orthopaedic exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-16
High Yield Overview

CARPAL INSTABILITY - DISI and VISI PATTERNS

Intercalated Segment Concept | SL vs LT Injury | Static vs Dynamic | SLAC Progression

30-60°Normal SL angle (average 47°)
Over 70°DISI pattern - SL injury
Under 30°VISI pattern - LT injury
10:1DISI:VISI frequency ratio

MAYFIELD CLASSIFICATION (PERILUNATE INSTABILITY)

Stage I
PatternScapholunate ligament disruption
TreatmentSL repair/reconstruction
Stage II
Pattern+ Capitolunate dislocation
TreatmentOpen reduction, ligament repair
Stage III
Pattern+ Lunotriquetral ligament
TreatmentComplete carpal repair
Stage IV
Pattern+ Lunate dislocation into carpal tunnel
TreatmentUrgent reduction, repair

Critical Must-Knows

  • Intercalated segment = proximal carpal row (no tendon attachments), controlled by ligaments
  • DISI = SL tear, lunate follows triquetrum dorsally (extended), SL angle over 70°
  • VISI = LT tear, lunate follows scaphoid palmarly (flexed), SL angle under 30°
  • Watson scaphoid shift test pathognomonic for SL instability (compare to contralateral)
  • Static vs dynamic - static shows on plain films, dynamic needs stress views

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    True lateral X-ray essential - measure SL angle from scaphoid axis to lunate perpendicular
  • "
    SL gap over 3mm on PA = Terry Thomas sign (compare to other side)
  • "
    Capitolunate angle over 15 degrees confirms carpal malalignment
  • "
    DISI progresses to SLAC wrist, VISI to ulnocarpal/midcarpal arthritis

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Carpal alignment and angle measurements on lateral wrist radiograph
Click to expand
Carpal angle measurements: Normal carpal alignment on lateral wrist radiograph showing scapholunate (SL) angle measurement technique. The SL angle is measured between the scaphoid axis and perpendicular to the lunate. Normal range is 30-60 degrees (average 47 degrees). The capitolunate angle should be less than 15 degrees.Credit: Life (MDPI) 2023 - PMC10381215 (CC-BY 4.0)
DISI deformity showing dorsal lunate tilt and increased SL angle
Click to expand
DISI (Dorsal Intercalated Segment Instability): Associated with scapholunate ligament injury. The lunate tilts dorsally (extended position) while the scaphoid rotates palmarly. SL angle exceeds 70 degrees. This is 10x more common than VISI and progresses to SLAC wrist arthritis if untreated.Credit: Life (MDPI) 2023 - PMC10381215 (CC-BY 4.0)
VISI deformity showing volar lunate tilt and decreased SL angle
Click to expand
VISI (Volar Intercalated Segment Instability): Associated with lunotriquetral ligament injury. The lunate tilts palmarly (flexed position) following the scaphoid. SL angle is less than 30 degrees. Less common than DISI and leads to ulnocarpal/midcarpal arthritis.Credit: Life (MDPI) 2023 - PMC10381215 (CC-BY 4.0)

Critical Carpal Instability Exam Points

DISI Pattern

SL ligament injury causes dorsal lunate tilt. SL angle over 70 degrees. Watson scaphoid shift test positive. Leads to SLAC wrist if untreated. 10x more common than VISI.

VISI Pattern

LT ligament injury causes volar lunate tilt. SL angle under 30 degrees. Reagan's LT ballottement test positive. Leads to ulnocarpal/midcarpal arthritis. Less common.

Static vs Dynamic

Dynamic = normal standard X-rays, abnormal stress views (partial tear). Static = abnormal resting X-rays (complete tear). Static has worse prognosis.

Key X-ray Findings

Terry Thomas sign = SL gap over 3mm on PA view. Scaphoid ring sign = rotatory subluxation. Gilula's arcs disrupted. Compare to contralateral wrist.

Quick Decision Guide - DISI vs VISI

FeatureDISIVISINormal
SL AngleOver 70°Under 30°30-60° (avg 47°)
Lunate PositionExtended (dorsal tilt)Flexed (volar tilt)Neutral
Ligament InjuredScapholunateLunotriquetralIntact
Clinical TestWatson scaphoid shiftReagan LT ballottementNegative
Arthritis PatternSLAC wristUlnocarpal/midcarpalNone
FrequencyCommon (90%)Rare (10%)N/A
Mnemonic

DISIDISI vs VISI Pattern

D
Dorsal
Lunate tilts dorsally (extended)
I
Intercalated
Proximal row = intercalated segment
S
Scapholunate
SL ligament is injured
I
Instability
SL angle greater than 70 degrees

Memory Hook:D for Dorsal, D for DISI - the lunate tilts Dorsally because SL ligament has strongest Dorsal component

Mnemonic

VISIVISI Pattern

V
Volar
Lunate tilts volarly (flexed)
I
Intercalated
Proximal row affected
S
Scapholunate angle
SL angle less than 30 degrees
I
Instability
LT ligament injured

Memory Hook:V for Volar, V for VISI - lunate follows scaphoid into Volar (palmar) flexion when LT torn

Mnemonic

SCLLMayfield Stages

S
Scapholunate
Stage I - SL ligament rupture
C
Capitolunate
Stage II - Perilunate dislocation
L
Lunotriquetral
Stage III - LT ligament rupture
L
Lunate
Stage IV - Lunate dislocates into carpal tunnel

Memory Hook:SCLL like SKULL - injury progresses around the lunate like drawing a skull, ending with lunate dislocation

Mnemonic

DPPSL Ligament Strength

D
Dorsal
Strongest portion (2-3mm thick)
P
Proximal
Membranous, weakest
P
Palmar
Intermediate strength

Memory Hook:DPP like Department of Public Prosecutions - Dorsal is the chief prosecutor, hardest to defeat

Overview

Understanding Carpal Instability

Carpal instability represents a spectrum of wrist pathology where normal carpal kinematics are disrupted due to ligamentous injury. The intercalated segment concept is central to understanding DISI and VISI patterns.

The Intercalated Segment Concept

The proximal carpal row (scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum) is termed the "intercalated segment" because it has:

  • No direct tendon attachments - movement is passive, controlled by ligaments
  • Positioned between the radius and distal carpal row
  • Acts as a link transmitting forces across the wrist

The proximal row naturally wants to:

  • Flex under axial load (due to scaphoid geometry)
  • Extend under compression (due to capitate articulation)

These opposing forces are balanced by the intrinsic intercarpal ligaments (SL and LT).

Why DISI and VISI Occur

DISI (Scapholunate Disruption):

  1. SL ligament torn leads to scaphoid no longer tethered to lunate
  2. Scaphoid flexes palmarly under load (natural tendency)
  3. Lunate, now attached only to triquetrum, extends dorsally
  4. Result: Lunate tilts dorsally = Dorsal Intercalated Segment Instability

VISI (Lunotriquetral Disruption):

  1. LT ligament torn leads to triquetrum no longer tethered to lunate
  2. Lunate loses stabilising effect of helicoid triquetrum
  3. Lunate follows scaphoid into flexion
  4. Result: Lunate tilts palmarly = Volar Intercalated Segment Instability

Exam Pearl

Key Biomechanical Principles:

  • Scaphoid naturally flexes; triquetrum naturally extends
  • Lunate follows whichever bone it remains attached to
  • SL injury leads to lunate following triquetrum into dorsal tilt (DISI)
  • LT injury leads to lunate following scaphoid into volar tilt (VISI)

Static vs Dynamic Instability

Dynamic Instability:

  • Radiographs appear normal at rest
  • Abnormal alignment only with stress views
  • Partial ligament injury
  • Better prognosis with early treatment

Static Instability:

  • Abnormal alignment on standard radiographs
  • Complete ligament disruption
  • Often requires surgical reconstruction
  • Higher risk of secondary arthritis

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Functional Anatomy of Carpal Ligaments

Understanding carpal instability requires detailed knowledge of the intrinsic and extrinsic carpal ligaments.

Intrinsic Ligaments (Intercarpal)

Scapholunate Ligament (SL):

  • Dorsal portion - thickest and strongest (2-3mm)
  • Palmar portion - intermediate strength
  • Proximal (membranous) portion - weakest, no structural role
  • Dorsal SL is the primary restraint to scaphoid flexion/pronation
  • Rupture sequence: palmar leads to proximal leads to dorsal

Lunotriquetral Ligament (LT):

  • Palmar portion - strongest component
  • Dorsal portion - intermediate
  • Proximal portion - membranous
  • Palmar LT is primary restraint to triquetral extension
  • Less commonly injured than SL

Extrinsic Ligaments

Palmar Extrinsic Ligaments (more important):

  • Radioscaphocapitate (RSC) - primary palmar stabiliser
  • Long radiolunate (LRL) - lunate stabilisation
  • Short radiolunate (SRL) - palmar constraint
  • Radioscapholunate (RSL) - neurovascular conduit, minimal structural role

Dorsal Extrinsic Ligaments:

  • Dorsal radiocarpal (DRC) - dorsal constraint
  • Dorsal intercarpal (DIC) - scaphoid-triquetrum link

Carpal Rows and Motion

Proximal Row (Intercalated Segment):

  • Scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum
  • No direct tendon attachments
  • Motion controlled by adjacent bones and ligaments
  • Moves as a unit when ligaments intact

Distal Row:

  • Trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, hamate
  • Rigidly interconnected
  • Minimal intercarpal motion
  • Fixed relationship with metacarpals

Dart Thrower's Motion:

  • Radial deviation + extension to ulnar deviation + flexion
  • Predominantly midcarpal motion
  • Least stress on intercarpal ligaments
  • Explains why this motion is preserved after some injuries

Blood Supply

Scapholunate Ligament:

  • Dorsal branch of radial artery
  • Anterior interosseous artery
  • Limited vascularity in central portion

Lunotriquetral Ligament:

  • Ulnar artery branches
  • Anterior interosseous artery
  • Slightly better vascularity than SL

Neural Innervation

  • Posterior interosseous nerve - dorsal ligaments
  • Anterior interosseous nerve - palmar ligaments
  • Proprioceptive function important for carpal kinematics
  • Denervation procedures may address pain but sacrifice proprioception

Classification Systems

Progressive Perilunar Instability

Sequential ligament disruption pattern in hyperextension injuries:

Stage I: Scapholunate ligament rupture resulting in SL dissociation.

Stage II: Plus capitolunate dislocation resulting in perilunate dislocation.

Stage III: Plus lunotriquetral ligament rupture causing LT disruption.

Stage IV: Plus dorsal radiocarpal ligament rupture causing lunate dislocation into carpal tunnel.

Each stage includes all previous stages - Stage IV has complete ligamentous disruption around the lunate.

Six-Stage Classification for SL Instability

Stage 1: Partial SL tear, no DISI - treat with arthroscopic debridement.

Stage 2: Complete SL tear, repairable, no DISI - treat with direct repair plus K-wires.

Stage 3: Complete tear, irreparable, no DISI - treat with dorsal capsulodesis.

Stage 4: Complete tear, DISI, reducible, no arthritis - treat with tendon reconstruction (RASL, modified Brunelli).

Stage 5: DISI, reducible, with arthritis - treat with limited fusion (STT, SC).

Stage 6: Irreducible DISI, severe arthritis - treat with salvage procedures (PRC, wrist fusion).

Instability Pattern Progression

Pre-dynamic: Pain and tenderness only. Normal radiographs including stress views. Partial ligament injury. Best prognosis with conservative treatment.

Dynamic: Normal standard radiographs. Abnormal stress views or fluoroscopy. Complete ligament tear with secondary restraints intact. May benefit from early surgical intervention.

Static Reducible: Abnormal standard radiographs. Malalignment correctable passively. Secondary restraints incompetent. Requires surgical stabilisation.

Static Irreducible: Fixed malalignment. Cannot be corrected without surgery. Often associated with arthritis. May require salvage procedures.

Lunotriquetral Instability Grading

Grade I: Partial tear with no instability. May be managed non-operatively with splinting. Good prognosis.

Grade II: Dynamic instability with positive provocative tests. Normal resting radiographs. Consider ligament repair or reconstruction.

Grade III: Static VISI deformity on standard radiographs. Complete ligament disruption. LT arthrodesis often preferred treatment (90% union rate).

Clinical Assessment

History and Examination

History

Mechanism of Injury:

  • Fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH) - most common
  • Hyperextension with ulnar deviation leads to SL injury
  • Extension with radial deviation leads to LT injury
  • High-energy trauma: perilunate dislocations

Symptoms:

  • Wrist pain (dorsal for SL, ulnar for LT)
  • Weakness of grip
  • "Clunking" or "clicking" with movement
  • Pain with weight-bearing activities
  • Swelling (often minimal in chronic cases)

Red Flags:

  • Acute severe deformity leads to perilunate dislocation
  • Median nerve symptoms leads to acute carpal tunnel from dislocation
  • Associated fractures (scaphoid, radial styloid)

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Swelling (dorsal = SL, ulnar = LT)
  • Prominence of ulnar head (LT injury)
  • Carpal height loss (chronic instability)

Palpation:

  • SL interval tenderness (1cm distal to Lister's tubercle)
  • LT interval tenderness (ulnar to lunate)
  • Scaphoid tubercle tenderness (SL injury)

Special Tests for Scapholunate Instability

Watson Scaphoid Shift Test:

  1. Patient's forearm in neutral rotation
  2. Examiner's thumb on scaphoid tubercle, fingers dorsally
  3. Apply pressure while moving wrist from ulnar to radial deviation
  4. Positive: Painful clunk as scaphoid subluxes dorsally
  5. Compare to contralateral side - may be positive bilaterally in lax individuals

Scaphoid Compression Test:

  • Axial load to thumb metacarpal
  • Positive: Pain at SL interval
  • Tests SL ligament integrity under compression

Finger Extension Test:

  • Resist active finger extension
  • Positive: Increased dorsal wrist pain
  • Indicates SL pathology

Special Tests for Lunotriquetral Instability

LT Ballottement Test (Reagan's Test):

  1. Stabilise lunate with one hand
  2. Translate triquetrum dorsally and palmarly
  3. Positive: Pain, crepitus, or increased motion
  4. Compare to contralateral side

LT Compression Test:

  1. Ulnar deviation of wrist
  2. Apply axial load through ring/small finger metacarpals
  3. Positive: Pain at LT interval

Shuck Test:

  • Pisiform used as lever to load LT joint
  • Positive: Pain, clicking

Carpal Instability Patterns

Carpal Instability Dissociative (CID):

  • Disruption within a carpal row
  • SL dissociation leads to DISI
  • LT dissociation leads to VISI
  • Most common pattern

Carpal Instability Non-Dissociative (CIND):

  • Disruption between carpal rows
  • Radiocarpal or midcarpal instability
  • Often involves extrinsic ligament injury
  • Catch-up clunk with ulnar to radial deviation

Carpal Instability Combined (CIC):

  • Both dissociative and non-dissociative
  • Perilunate injuries
  • Severe trauma

Carpal Instability Adaptive (CIA):

  • Secondary to malunited distal radius fracture
  • Dorsal malunion leads to compensatory VISI
  • Palmar malunion leads to compensatory DISI
  • Treat the radius, not the carpal malalignment

Investigations

Imaging Studies

Plain Radiographs

Standard Views:

  • PA view - carpal spacing, arcs of Gilula
  • True lateral - carpal angles (most important for DISI/VISI)
  • Scaphoid view - scaphoid pathology
  • Contralateral comparison - essential for borderline cases

Key Measurements on Lateral View:

Scapholunate Angle:

  • Line along long axis of scaphoid
  • Line perpendicular to lunate distal articular surface
  • Normal: 30-60 degrees (average 47 degrees)
  • DISI: greater than 70 degrees
  • VISI: less than 30 degrees

Capitolunate Angle:

  • Line along long axis of capitate
  • Line perpendicular to lunate
  • Normal: less than 15 degrees
  • Greater than 15 degrees = instability

Radiolunate Angle:

  • Long axis of radius to lunate
  • Normal: neutral (0 degrees ± 10)
  • Abnormal in DISI/VISI patterns

PA View Findings:

SL Gap (Terry Thomas Sign):

  • Normal SL interval: less than 3mm
  • Greater than 3mm suggests SL injury
  • Greater than 5mm = complete SL tear
  • Compare to contralateral side

Gilula's Arcs:

  • Arc I: Proximal carpal row proximal surfaces
  • Arc II: Proximal carpal row distal surfaces
  • Arc III: Capitate-hamate proximal surfaces
  • Disruption indicates intercarpal pathology

Scaphoid Ring Sign:

  • Cortical ring appearance of scaphoid
  • Indicates scaphoid flexion (rotatory subluxation)
  • Seen in SL dissociation/DISI

Stress Radiographs

Clenched Fist View:

  • AP view with tight fist
  • Loads scapholunate interval
  • May reveal dynamic widening

Radial/Ulnar Deviation Views:

  • Maximum radial and ulnar deviation
  • Assess scaphoid motion
  • Dynamic DISI may only appear in radial deviation

Fluoroscopy:

  • Real-time assessment of carpal motion
  • Dart thrower's arc evaluation
  • Provocative manoeuvres under imaging

Advanced Imaging

MRI:

  • Soft tissue ligament visualisation
  • SL and LT ligament integrity
  • Associated TFCC pathology
  • Bone marrow oedema pattern

MR Arthrography:

  • Gold standard for ligament tears
  • 90% sensitivity/specificity for SL tears
  • Contrast leak patterns:
    • Radiocarpal space leads to midcarpal = SL tear
    • Midcarpal leads to radiocarpal = LT tear

CT:

  • Bone detail
  • Fracture identification
  • 3D reconstructions for surgical planning

Arthroscopy:

  • Definitive diagnostic tool
  • Allows dynamic assessment
  • Grading of ligament tears (Geissler classification)
  • Therapeutic intervention possible

Geissler Arthroscopic Classification

Grade I:

  • Attenuation/haemorrhage of interosseous ligament
  • No instability with probing

Grade II:

  • Ligament attenuation with incongruity
  • Step-off visible between carpal bones
  • Probe cannot be passed between bones

Grade III:

  • Incongruity and step-off
  • Probe can pass between bones (from midcarpal side)
  • Volar ligament intact

Grade IV:

  • Complete ligament disruption
  • 2.7mm arthroscope passes through gap
  • Gross instability

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Carpal Instability Disi Visi
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Carpal Instability Disi VisiCredit: OrthoVellum

Indications:

Pre-dynamic instability with partial ligament tears and no instability on examination. Patient factors precluding surgery. Temporary stabilisation before definitive surgery.

Treatment Protocol:

Immobilisation in slight flexion and ulnar deviation for 4-6 weeks with cast or splint. Physiotherapy for proprioception and grip strengthening. Activity modification to avoid provocative movements. Serial examinations to monitor for progression.

Acute SL Injury (under 6 weeks):

Geissler I-II: Arthroscopic debridement for partial tears without instability. Thermal shrinkage controversial with limited long-term evidence.

Geissler III-IV: Open dorsal approach with direct ligament repair using suture anchors. K-wire fixation of SL and SC joints. 8-12 weeks immobilisation. Best results with acute intervention.

Chronic SL Injury (over 6 weeks, no arthritis):

Dorsal Capsulodesis (Blatt Procedure): Capsular flap attached to scaphoid to limit flexion. Reasonable short-term results but may stretch over time.

Tendon Reconstruction: RASL, Brunelli, modified Brunelli techniques. Bone-retinaculum-bone graft or internal brace augmentation options available.

With Arthritis:

Limited Fusions: STT or scaphocapitate fusion preserves some motion. Salvage Procedures: PRC, four-corner fusion, or total wrist fusion for severe cases.

Acute LT Injury:

Direct repair via palmar or dorsal approach with suture anchor fixation and K-wire stabilisation. Better outcomes than chronic repair.

Chronic LT Injury:

LT Arthrodesis: Most reliable option with high union rate using compression fixation. Minimal motion loss as LT contributes little to wrist motion. May address VISI deformity.

Ligament Reconstruction: Tendon graft techniques less predictable. Reserve for young, high-demand patients.

With Arthritis:

LT fusion addresses instability and pain with limited motion sacrifice. Salvage procedures (PRC, wrist fusion) for severe cases.

SL Instability Algorithm:

Dynamic instability with no DISI: Capsulodesis or ligament repair.

Static DISI, reducible, no arthritis: Tendon reconstruction (modified Brunelli, RASL).

Static DISI with arthritis: Limited fusion (STT, scaphocapitate) or salvage (PRC, four-corner fusion).

LT Instability Algorithm:

Dynamic VISI: Direct repair if acute, reconstruction if chronic.

Static VISI, no arthritis: LT arthrodesis (preferred) or reconstruction.

Static VISI with arthritis: LT fusion or salvage procedures.

Surgical Technique

Setup and Approach:

Supine position with arm table, tourniquet applied to upper arm. Dorsal longitudinal incision centred over Lister's tubercle extending 4-5cm. Develop interval between 3rd and 4th extensor compartments. Protect extensor tendons and create dorsal capsulotomy (ligament-sparing or traditional).

Direct Repair Technique:

Identify torn SL ligament remnants. Debride non-viable tissue. Place suture anchors in scaphoid and lunate. Repair dorsal SL ligament with non-absorbable sutures. May augment with dorsal capsulodesis.

Reconstruction (Modified Brunelli):

Harvest FCR tendon strip (10cm length, 1/2 width). Drill 3.2mm tunnel through scaphoid from distal pole to SL interval. Pass tendon graft through scaphoid tunnel. Anchor to lunate with suture anchor or bone tunnel. Tensioned with wrist in neutral or slight extension.

K-wire Fixation:

Place 1.1-1.4mm K-wires across SL joint (2 wires) and scaphocapitate joint (1-2 wires). Check reduction fluoroscopically. Wires remain 8-10 weeks.

Approach:

Dorsal ulnar incision between 4th and 5th extensor compartments. Identify and protect DRUJ and ECU tendon. Expose LT joint through dorsal capsulotomy.

Preparation:

Remove articular cartilage from lunate and triquetrum using curettes or burr. Preserve subchondral bone plate. Create bleeding cancellous surfaces.

Fixation:

Reduce VISI deformity, confirm with lateral fluoroscopy. Place compression screw (headless cannulated) or plate/screws. Add autograft or allograft bone graft. Consider K-wire augmentation. Assess reduction and hardware position fluoroscopically.

Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC):

Remove scaphoid, lunate, and triquetrum. Capitate articulates directly with lunate fossa of radius. Preserves approximately 50% wrist motion. Contraindicated if capitate head cartilage damage.

Four-Corner Fusion (Scaphoid Excision):

Remove scaphoid. Fuse lunate, capitate, triquetrum, hamate. Preserve approximately 50% wrist motion. Better for heavy manual labourers than PRC.

Total Wrist Fusion:

Ultimate salvage for failed reconstruction or severe pancarpal arthritis. Fuse radius to metacarpals via dorsal plate. Eliminates wrist motion but provides reliable pain relief and stability.

Reduction Assessment:

True lateral radiograph essential. Confirm SL angle correction (target 47 degrees). Check scaphoid ring sign resolved on PA view. Verify Gilula's arcs restored.

Common Pitfalls:

Inadequate ligament repair tension. Failure to address secondary restraints. K-wire migration or breakage. Overtensioning reconstruction causing stiffness.

Postoperative Protocol:

Long-arm cast/splint for 2-4 weeks then short-arm for 4-6 weeks. K-wire removal at 8-10 weeks. Protected motion in thermoplastic splint. Full rehabilitation over 3-6 months.

Complications

Complications of Carpal Instability

Natural History (Untreated)

DISI/Scapholunate Dissociation:

  • Progressive radioscaphoid arthritis
  • SLAC wrist pattern (Stages I to II to III)
  • Similar to SNAC wrist progression
  • 30-50% develop arthritis within 10 years

VISI/Lunotriquetral Dissociation:

  • Less predictable progression
  • Ulnocarpal impaction may develop
  • Midcarpal arthritis possible
  • Generally slower progression than DISI

Complications of Surgery

Early Complications:

Infection:

  • Superficial: 2-5%
  • Deep: less than 1%
  • Treatment: antibiotics, debridement if needed

Nerve Injury:

  • Superficial radial nerve (dorsal approach)
  • DBRCU (dorsal approach)
  • Posterior interosseous nerve
  • Usually neuropraxia, resolves

Hardware Problems:

  • K-wire migration/breakage
  • Screw prominence
  • Removal often required

Late Complications:

Persistent Instability:

  • Incomplete ligament healing
  • Stretched repair
  • May require revision or salvage

Stiffness:

  • Common after prolonged immobilisation
  • Intensive physiotherapy required
  • May require tenolysis/capsular release

Recurrent DISI/VISI:

  • Progressive stretching of reconstruction
  • Revision surgery options limited
  • May progress to salvage

Secondary Arthritis:

  • Altered joint loading
  • Progressive cartilage degeneration
  • Ultimate outcome similar to untreated instability
  • Salvage fusion may be required

Procedure-Specific Complications:

Limited Fusions (STT, SC):

  • Non-union: 5-15%
  • Hardware prominence
  • Adjacent joint arthritis
  • Residual instability

Proximal Row Carpectomy:

  • Radiocapitate arthritis
  • Progressive pain
  • May require total wrist fusion

Total Wrist Fusion:

  • Loss of all wrist motion
  • Hardware failure
  • Non-union: less than 5%
  • Adjacent joint stress

Managing Failed Surgery

Workup:

  • Detailed history: what was done, when, outcomes
  • Physical examination
  • CT for fusion assessment
  • MRI for soft tissue evaluation
  • Diagnostic arthroscopy if needed

Revision Options:

  • Re-repair/reconstruction (early failure)
  • Conversion to limited fusion
  • Salvage procedures

Patient Counselling:

  • Progressive procedures available
  • Each surgery reduces options
  • Ultimate salvage is wrist fusion
  • Realistic expectations essential

Postoperative Care

Immobilisation:

Long-arm cast or splint for first 2-4 weeks to control forearm rotation. Transition to short-arm cast/splint for remaining 4-6 weeks. Wrist positioned in slight extension and ulnar deviation.

Monitoring:

Wound check at 10-14 days. Suture/staple removal at 2 weeks. Monitor for infection, neurovascular compromise. X-rays at 2 and 6 weeks to assess hardware and reduction.

Early Exercises:

Active finger ROM from day one to prevent stiffness. Shoulder and elbow ROM exercises. Oedema control with elevation and compression.

K-wire Removal:

Typically at 8-10 weeks under local anaesthesia. Confirm radiographic healing before removal. May delay if healing concerns.

Protected Motion:

Custom thermoplastic splint for protection. Begin active-assisted wrist ROM exercises. Avoid resisted gripping and loading. Continue finger and forearm ROM.

Therapy Initiation:

Formal hand therapy begins. Scar management and desensitisation. Progressive wrist flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation.

Progressive Strengthening:

Gradual introduction of grip strengthening. Theraband exercises for wrist strengthening. Proprioceptive training with unstable surfaces. Functional activity training.

Return to Activity:

Light desk work at 8-12 weeks. Light manual work at 3-4 months. Heavy manual work at 6-12 months. Contact sports at 6-12 months with protective splinting initially.

Ongoing Assessment:

Serial radiographs to monitor alignment. Clinical assessment of stability. Functional outcome measures (DASH, PRWHE).

Outcomes and Prognosis

Long-Term Outcomes

SL Instability Treatment Outcomes:

Direct repair (acute): 80-90% good/excellent results when performed within 3 weeks of injury. Results deteriorate significantly after 6 weeks.

Capsulodesis: 70% satisfaction at 5 years, but 30% recurrent DISI. Better for dynamic instability as bridge procedure.

Tendon reconstruction (modified Brunelli): 78% good/excellent at 3 years declining to 56% at 10 years. Progressive stretching of reconstruction is a concern.

Limited fusions (STT, scaphocapitate): 75-85% pain relief. Approximately 50% motion preservation. 5-15% non-union rate.

LT Instability Treatment Outcomes:

Direct repair (acute): Better outcomes than chronic repair. 80% good results when performed acutely.

LT arthrodesis: 90% union rate. Minimal motion loss. Most predictable outcome for chronic LT instability.

Salvage Procedure Outcomes:

PRC: 80% good/excellent at 5-10 years. Preserves functional ROM. May deteriorate over time with radiocapitate arthritis.

Four-corner fusion: Similar outcomes to PRC. May be preferred for heavy manual labourers.

Total wrist fusion: Reliable pain relief. Complete loss of wrist motion. Last resort option.

Prognostic Factors:

Favourable: Acute injury (under 6 weeks), dynamic instability, young age, no arthritis, good compliance.

Unfavourable: Chronic injury, static instability, arthritis present, heavy manual occupation, bilateral disease.

Evidence Base

Current Evidence

SL Reconstruction Outcomes

III
Key Findings:
  • Long-term follow-up of modified Brunelli tenodesis for chronic SL dissociation showed 78% good/excellent results at 3 years, but only 56% at 10 years. Progressive stretching of tendon reconstruction is a concern.
Clinical Implication: SL reconstructions may deteriorate over time - patients should be counselled about potential need for salvage procedures in the future.

Arthroscopic Grading Correlates with Outcomes

IV
Key Findings:
  • Original description of arthroscopic classification for intercarpal ligament injuries. Higher grades (III-IV) associated with worse outcomes from non-operative treatment and better correlation with need for surgical intervention.
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic assessment provides prognostic information and guides treatment decisions for carpal ligament injuries.

Dorsal Capsulodesis Results

IV
Key Findings:
  • Modified dorsal capsulodesis for dynamic SL instability showed 70% patient satisfaction at 5 years. DISI recurred in 30% of patients. Results deteriorated over time.
Clinical Implication: Capsulodesis provides reasonable short-term results but long-term durability is limited. Consider for dynamic instability as bridge to reconstruction.

LT Arthrodesis vs Reconstruction

IV
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review comparing LT arthrodesis to ligament reconstruction. Arthrodesis showed higher union rates (90% vs 75%) and more predictable outcomes. Motion loss minimal due to limited LT contribution to wrist motion.
Clinical Implication: LT arthrodesis is the preferred treatment for chronic LT instability given reliable union rates and minimal functional impact.

SLAC Wrist Development After SL Injury

IV
Key Findings:
  • Classic paper describing SLAC wrist pattern following untreated SL dissociation. Predictable progression from radial styloid to scaphoid fossa to capitolunate joint. Radiolunate joint typically spared.
Clinical Implication: Natural history of untreated SL dissociation is progressive arthritis following SLAC pattern - supports early treatment of SL injuries.

Australian Guidelines

RACS Position:

  • Carpal instability management should be performed by trained hand surgeons
  • Early referral for suspected ligament injuries
  • MRI or arthroscopy for definitive diagnosis

PBS Considerations:

  • Postoperative analgesia: paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids as needed
  • No specific PBS listings for hand surgery procedures

Public System Coverage:

  • Ligament reconstruction procedures covered under public hospital system
  • Carpal arthrodesis and wrist arthroscopy fully funded

Viva Scenarios

Examination Practice

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Chronic Scapholunate Instability Assessment

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old man presents 3 months after a fall on his outstretched hand. He has persistent dorsal wrist pain and weakness. X-rays show widened SL interval and increased SL angle. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is consistent with **chronic scapholunate dissociation** with a DISI pattern. The 3-month delay is critical - this is beyond the acute window where direct repair is possible. **My Assessment:** 1. **History**: Mechanism (FOOSH with hyperextension), initial treatment, current symptoms (pain, clicking, weakness), functional impact, hand dominance, and occupation 2. **Examination**: SL interval tenderness (1cm distal to Lister's tubercle), Watson scaphoid shift test (expect positive with painful clunk), grip strength measurement, compare to contralateral side 3. **Investigations**: PA and lateral X-rays to confirm DISI (SL angle greater than 70°), clenched fist view for dynamic widening, MRI arthrography to assess ligament integrity, consider diagnostic arthroscopy **Management:** At 3 months, this is chronic. Direct repair is unlikely to succeed as ligament ends will have retracted and scarred. - **If no arthritis**: Ligament reconstruction (modified Brunelli, RASL, or internal brace augmentation) - **If mild arthritis**: Consider limited fusion (STT or scaphocapitate) - **If significant arthritis**: Salvage procedure (PRC or four-corner fusion) I would counsel that even with reconstruction, 70-80% achieve good outcomes, but there is a risk of progressive stretching and eventual need for salvage.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
3 months = chronic injury, beyond acute repair window
Watson scaphoid shift test is key clinical examination
DISI pattern confirmed by SL angle greater than 70 degrees
Chronic SL requires reconstruction, not direct repair
Treatment choice depends on presence/absence of arthritis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting direct repair at 3 months post-injury
✗Not checking for arthritis before recommending reconstruction
✗Forgetting to compare Watson test to contralateral side
✗Not counselling about progressive nature even with treatment
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the modified Brunelli technique?"
"What is the SLAC wrist progression pattern?"
"How long should you immobilise after SL reconstruction?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

VISI Pattern Interpretation

EXAMINER

"You are shown a lateral wrist X-ray with SL angle of 25 degrees and capitolunate angle of 20 degrees. What is the diagnosis and how does this differ from DISI?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This radiograph demonstrates a **VISI pattern (Volar Intercalated Segment Instability)**. **X-ray Interpretation:** - SL angle 25° is less than the normal range (30-60°), indicating volar lunate tilt - CL angle 20° exceeds normal (less than 15°), confirming carpal malalignment - The lunate appears flexed (tilted palmarly) **VISI vs DISI Comparison:** | Feature | DISI | VISI | |---------|------|------| | SL Angle | Greater than 70° | Less than 30° | | Lunate Tilt | Dorsal (extended) | Volar (flexed) | | Ligament Injured | Scapholunate | Lunotriquetral | | Frequency | 10× more common | Rare | | Arthritis Pattern | SLAC wrist | Ulnocarpal/midcarpal | **Biomechanical Explanation:** With LT ligament injury, the triquetrum no longer constrains the lunate. Since the scaphoid naturally tends to flex, and the lunate is still connected to the scaphoid via the SL ligament, the lunate follows the scaphoid into flexion - hence VISI pattern with decreased SL angle. **Clinical Assessment** would include LT ballottement test (Reagan's test), LT compression test, and shuck test - all causing ulnar-sided wrist pain. **Treatment**: Acute injuries benefit from direct repair. For chronic LT instability, **LT arthrodesis** is preferred as it provides 90% union rate with minimal motion loss.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
VISI = SL angle less than 30 degrees (lunate flexed)
DISI = SL angle greater than 70 degrees (lunate extended)
VISI results from LT ligament injury
DISI 10 times more common than VISI
LT arthrodesis is preferred treatment for chronic VISI
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing DISI and VISI patterns
✗Forgetting the biomechanics - lunate follows attached bone
✗Not knowing the different arthritis patterns
✗Missing that VISI is much rarer than DISI
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why is LT arthrodesis acceptable when SL arthrodesis is avoided?"
"What clinical tests specifically assess LT integrity?"
"What is the natural history of untreated LT dissociation?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Mayfield Classification of Perilunate Instability

EXAMINER

"Describe the Mayfield classification of perilunate instability and explain the anatomical basis for this progression."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The **Mayfield classification** describes **progressive perilunar instability** - sequential ligamentous failure around the lunate following wrist hyperextension, ulnar deviation, and intercarpal supination. **Stage I - Scapholunate Disruption:** - Force begins at the radial side of the carpus - Scapholunate ligament ruptures, scaphoid separates from lunate - Results in SL dissociation with DISI pattern - X-rays show widened SL gap and increased SL angle **Stage II - Capitolunate Disruption:** - Space of Poirier (weak palmar area) fails - Capitate dislocates dorsally around the lunate - This is the **perilunate dislocation** - lunate remains in lunate fossa, capitate posterior to it **Stage III - Lunotriquetral Disruption:** - Force propagates to the ulnar side - LT ligament ruptures, lunate now completely isolated from other carpals - Still located in lunate fossa **Stage IV - Lunate Dislocation:** - Dorsal radiocarpal ligament fails - Lunate rotates and dislocates volarly into carpal tunnel - Classic **"spilled teacup"** appearance on lateral X-ray - Risk of **acute carpal tunnel syndrome** - surgical emergency **Key Clinical Points:** - Each stage includes all previous stages - May occur with transscaphoid fracture (greater arc injury) or purely ligamentous (lesser arc) - Treatment is urgent reduction and ligament repair - Poor outcomes if missed beyond 2 weeks
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Stage I: SL ligament disruption (DISI)
Stage II: + Capitolunate (perilunate dislocation)
Stage III: + LT ligament disruption
Stage IV: + Lunate dislocation into carpal tunnel
Space of Poirier is the weak spot in palmar capsule
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not knowing all four Mayfield stages in order
✗Confusing perilunate (Stage II) with lunate (Stage IV) dislocation
✗Forgetting carpal tunnel syndrome risk with Stage IV
✗Not mentioning greater arc vs lesser arc injuries
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Space of Poirier?"
"How do you differentiate perilunate from lunate dislocation on X-ray?"
"What is the outcome if perilunate dislocation is missed for 3 weeks?"

MCQ Practice Points

SL Angle Question

Q: What SL angle confirms DISI pattern on lateral wrist radiograph?

A: Greater than 70 degrees confirms DISI pattern. Normal SL angle is 30-60 degrees (average 47 degrees). VISI pattern shows SL angle less than 30 degrees.

Mayfield Stage Question

Q: A patient with perilunate dislocation has disruption of SL and LT ligaments with the lunate still in the lunate fossa. What Mayfield stage is this?

A: Stage III - includes SL disruption (Stage I), capitolunate disruption (Stage II), and LT disruption (Stage III). Stage IV would show lunate dislocation into carpal tunnel.

Clinical Test Question

Q: Which clinical test is most specific for scapholunate ligament injury?

A: Watson scaphoid shift test - pressure on scaphoid tubercle while moving wrist from ulnar to radial deviation produces painful dorsal subluxation clunk. Must compare to contralateral side as may be positive bilaterally in lax individuals.

LT Treatment Question

Q: What is the preferred treatment for chronic LT instability with static VISI deformity?

A: LT arthrodesis - provides 90% union rate with minimal motion loss since LT joint contributes little to overall wrist motion. More predictable than ligament reconstruction.

Natural History Question

Q: What is the natural history of untreated chronic SL dissociation?

A: SLAC wrist (scapholunate advanced collapse) - predictable arthritis pattern progressing from radial styloid to scaphoid fossa to capitolunate joint. Radiolunate joint typically spared. 30-50% develop arthritis within 10 years.

Australian Context

Australian Context

Carpal instability management in Australia follows international best practice with several local considerations.

Referral Pathways:

Most carpal ligament injuries are initially managed by emergency departments or general practitioners. Early referral to hand surgeons is recommended for suspected SL or LT injuries, particularly with positive clinical tests or radiographic abnormalities. Major metropolitan centres have dedicated hand units at tertiary hospitals.

Imaging Access:

MRI and MR arthrography are widely available in metropolitan areas. Wait times for public MRI may be 4-8 weeks, potentially delaying diagnosis of acute injuries. Private imaging is recommended for suspected acute ligament injuries to expedite surgical planning.

Surgical Considerations:

Hand surgery is performed in both public and private settings. Complex reconstructions and salvage procedures typically require fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Arthroscopic facilities and expertise are available at major centres.

Rehabilitation Services:

Hand therapy is well-established in Australia with AHTA-accredited hand therapists available in metropolitan and regional areas. Custom splinting and specialised hand therapy protocols are standard of care.

PBS Considerations:

Standard analgesics (paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids) available on PBS for postoperative pain management. No specific PBS listings for hand surgery procedures.

Carpal Instability DISI/VISI

High-Yield Exam Summary

Radiographic Criteria

  • •Normal SL angle: 30-60° (average 47°)
  • •DISI: SL angle over 70°, lunate extended dorsally
  • •VISI: SL angle under 30°, lunate flexed palmarly
  • •Normal CL angle: under 15°
  • •SL gap over 3mm = Terry Thomas sign
  • •Scaphoid ring sign = rotatory subluxation

Clinical Tests

  • •Watson scaphoid shift: SL instability (DISI)
  • •LT ballottement (Reagan's): LT instability (VISI)
  • •Compare all tests to contralateral side
  • •Dynamic instability = positive stress tests only
  • •Static instability = abnormal standard X-rays

Mayfield Stages

  • •Stage I: SL ligament
  • •Stage II: + Capitolunate (perilunate dislocation)
  • •Stage III: + LT ligament
  • •Stage IV: + Dorsal radiocarpal (lunate dislocation)

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Acute SL (under 6 weeks): Direct repair + K-wires
  • •Chronic SL (no arthritis): Tendon reconstruction
  • •SL + arthritis: Limited fusion or salvage
  • •LT instability: Arthrodesis preferred (90% union)
  • •Salvage: PRC, 4-corner fusion, wrist fusion

Key Biomechanics

  • •Scaphoid flexes; triquetrum extends
  • •Lunate follows attached bone
  • •SL tear leads to lunate follows triquetrum leads to DISI
  • •LT tear leads to lunate follows scaphoid leads to VISI
  • •DISI 10× more common than VISI

Exam Tips

  • •Always compare to contralateral wrist
  • •Explain intercalated segment concept
  • •Know Mayfield stages for viva
  • •Understand why reconstructions fail over time
  • •Be able to interpret lateral wrist X-rays
Quick Stats
Reading Time102 min
Related Topics

Scapholunate Dissociation

Animal Bites

Anterior Interosseous Nerve Anatomy

Blood Supply of the Forearm