Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cartilage Healing and Repair

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Cartilage Healing and Repair

Comprehensive guide to articular cartilage healing biology, repair mechanisms, and surgical interventions including microfracture, osteochondral grafts, and cell-based therapies for FRCS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

CARTILAGE HEALING AND REPAIR

Avascular Tissue | Limited Intrinsic Healing | Repair Strategies

0%Blood supply (avascular)
2-4mmTypical articular cartilage thickness
Type IIPredominant collagen type
5%Chondrocyte cell volume

Cartilage Injury Depth Classification

Partial Thickness
PatternAbove tidemark, no bleeding
TreatmentVery limited healing potential
Full Thickness
PatternTo subchondral bone, marrow access
TreatmentFibrocartilage repair possible
Osteochondral
PatternInto subchondral bone
TreatmentRequires surgical intervention

Critical Must-Knows

  • Articular cartilage is avascular - no blood supply limits healing
  • Partial thickness injuries do not heal due to no marrow access
  • Full thickness defects heal with fibrocartilage (Type I collagen)
  • Fibrocartilage is biomechanically inferior to hyaline cartilage
  • Surgical strategies aim to restore hyaline-like tissue

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Type II collagen in hyaline vs Type I in fibrocartilage repair
  • "
    Chondrocytes have minimal mitotic activity in adults
  • "
    Synovial fluid provides nutrition via diffusion
  • "
    Subchondral bone breach necessary for any spontaneous repair

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

(A) Mechanical axis anteroposterior (AP) standing radiograph with valgus deformity of the right knee. The mechanical axis (from the center of the femoral head to the center of the talus) passes throug
Click to expand
(A) Mechanical axis anteroposterior (AP) standing radiograph with valgus deformity of the right knee. The mechanical axis (from the center of the femoCredit: Harris JD et al. via Orthop J Sports Med via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Histology of articular cartilage showing three distinct zones: superficial, middle, and deep
Click to expand
Histological sections (H&E stain) demonstrating the three zones of articular cartilage. Panel A (Superficial Zone): Flattened chondrocytes aligned parallel to the articular surface, high cell density, collagen fibers parallel to resist shear forces. Panel D (Middle Zone): Randomly oriented, rounded chondrocytes in a transitional arrangement. Panel G (Deep Zone): Large columnar chondrocytes arranged perpendicular to the subchondral bone interface, collagen fibers oriented vertically to absorb compressive loads. Understanding zonal organization is critical because injuries above the tidemark (superficial/middle zones) cannot heal due to lack of blood supply, while only full-thickness injuries penetrating to the deep zone and subchondral bone can access marrow elements for fibrocartilage repair.Credit: Bautista et al., PLOS ONE 2016 - CC0 Public Domain

Critical Cartilage Healing Exam Points

Why Cartilage Cannot Heal

Avascular, aneural, alymphatic tissue. No blood supply means no inflammatory response or marrow-derived stem cells. Chondrocytes have minimal mitotic activity. Nutrition via synovial fluid diffusion only. Matrix turnover extremely slow.

Partial vs Full Thickness

Partial thickness injuries (above tidemark) have zero healing potential - cells cannot migrate, no inflammatory response. Full thickness injuries penetrating subchondral bone access marrow elements and form fibrocartilage repair tissue.

Fibrocartilage vs Hyaline

Repair tissue is fibrocartilage (Type I collagen) not hyaline (Type II). Fibrocartilage has inferior mechanical properties: less compressive stiffness, poor wear resistance, deteriorates over time under load.

Surgical Goal

All surgical interventions aim to restore hyaline-like tissue. Microfracture creates fibrocartilage. Osteochondral grafts (OATS) transplant true hyaline. ACI/MACI aim for hyaline-like regeneration with variable success.

At a Glance

Articular cartilage has virtually no intrinsic healing capacity due to being avascular, aneural, alymphatic, and having chondrocytes with minimal mitotic activity. Partial thickness injuries (above tidemark) cannot heal—no blood supply means no inflammatory response or marrow-derived stem cells. Full thickness injuries penetrating subchondral bone access marrow elements and form fibrocartilage (Type I collagen), which is biomechanically inferior to native hyaline cartilage (Type II collagen). Surgical repair strategies aim to restore hyaline-like tissue: microfracture produces fibrocartilage, OATS transplants true hyaline, ACI/MACI aims for hyaline-like regeneration, and osteochondral allograft provides fresh hyaline cartilage for large defects. Cartilage is 65-80% water with chondrocytes comprising only 5% of tissue volume.

Mnemonic

AAAAWhy Cartilage Cannot Self-Repair

A
Avascular
No blood supply, no inflammatory response
A
Aneural
No nerve supply, delayed presentation
A
Alymphatic
No lymphatic drainage
A
Amitotic
Chondrocytes have minimal cell division

Memory Hook:Four As = Four reasons cartilage cannot heal!

Mnemonic

WATERCartilage Composition

W
Water 65-80%
High water content for load bearing
A
Aggrecan
Main proteoglycan, traps water
T
Type II collagen
Primary structural protein
E
ECM 95%
Extracellular matrix dominates volume
R
Rare cells 5%
Chondrocytes only 5% of volume

Memory Hook:WATER composition allows cartilage to bear load!

Mnemonic

MOCHACartilage Repair Options

M
Microfracture
Marrow stimulation, fibrocartilage result
O
OATS
Osteochondral autograft, true hyaline
C
Cell-based (ACI/MACI)
Cultured chondrocytes, hyaline-like
H
Hyaluronic scaffolds
Matrix-assisted techniques
A
Allograft (OCA)
Fresh osteochondral allograft

Memory Hook:MOCHA - order your cartilage repair like coffee, from simple to complex!

Overview

Articular cartilage is a specialized connective tissue with unique properties optimized for load bearing and joint articulation. Its composition and structure provide excellent mechanical function but severely limit intrinsic healing capacity.

Clinical Significance

Cartilage injuries are common, affecting up to 60% of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. The inability of cartilage to heal spontaneously leads to progressive joint degeneration and osteoarthritis. Understanding cartilage biology is essential for rational treatment selection.

Historical Perspective

Hunter's 1743 statement that "ulcerated cartilage is a troublesome thing, once destroyed it is not repaired" remains relevant. Modern surgical techniques attempt to overcome this biological limitation through various regenerative strategies.

Biology and Pathophysiology

Cartilage Structure and Composition

Articular cartilage consists of chondrocytes embedded in an extensive extracellular matrix (ECM). The ECM comprises approximately 95% of tissue volume and contains:

Collagen (10-20% wet weight): Predominantly Type II collagen arranged in zone-specific orientations. Provides tensile strength and tissue architecture. Type IX and XI collagens are also present in smaller amounts.

Proteoglycans (5-10% wet weight): Aggrecan is the major proteoglycan, bound to hyaluronic acid. Glycosaminoglycans (chondroitin sulfate, keratan sulfate) create negative charge attracting water.

Water (65-80% wet weight): Trapped by proteoglycan charge. Provides compressive stiffness through fluid pressurization.

Zonal Organization

Articular Cartilage Zones

ZoneDepth from SurfaceCollagen OrientationCell ShapeFunction
Superficial (Tangential)10-20%Parallel to surfaceFlat, elongatedShear resistance, joint lubrication
Transitional (Middle)40-60%Random/obliqueRoundedTransition zone, shock absorption
Deep (Radial)30%PerpendicularColumnarResist compression, anchor to bone
CalcifiedVariableInto subchondral boneHypertrophicTransition to subchondral bone

Why Partial Thickness Injuries Cannot Heal

Injuries confined to cartilage above the tidemark have no access to:

  • Blood supply (no inflammatory cells)
  • Bone marrow (no mesenchymal stem cells)
  • Clotting factors (no fibrin scaffold)

Chondrocytes adjacent to injury have limited mitotic capacity and cannot migrate to fill defects. Proteoglycan depletion around the lesion rim leads to progressive degeneration.

The Tidemark Is Critical

The tidemark separates calcified from non-calcified cartilage. Injuries above the tidemark (partial thickness) cannot heal. Only injuries penetrating through the calcified cartilage to subchondral bone can access marrow elements for any repair response.

Full Thickness Injury Response

When injury penetrates subchondral bone, the following sequence occurs:

  1. Hemorrhage and clot formation - fibrin scaffold forms
  2. Inflammatory response - macrophages and growth factors
  3. MSC migration - marrow-derived stem cells populate defect
  4. Fibrocartilage formation - cells differentiate into fibrochondrocytes
  5. Type I collagen production - inferior repair tissue forms

This repair tissue is biomechanically inferior: less stiff, poor wear resistance, and tends to degenerate over time.

Clinical Relevance and Repair Strategies

Microfracture

The most commonly performed cartilage repair procedure. Creates 3-4mm holes in subchondral bone at 3-4mm intervals to access marrow elements.

Mechanism: Bone marrow bleeding into defect provides MSCs, growth factors, and fibrin scaffold for repair tissue formation.

Repair tissue: Fibrocartilage (Type I collagen) with inferior biomechanical properties.

Indications:

  • Smaller defects (under 2-4 cm squared)
  • Contained lesions with stable shoulders
  • First-line treatment in many centers

Outcomes: Good short-term results but deterioration at 5-8 years as fibrocartilage degenerates under load.

This technique remains widely used due to simplicity and low cost.

OATS (Osteochondral Autograft Transfer)

Transfers cylindrical plugs of hyaline cartilage with underlying bone from non-weight-bearing areas to defect.

Mechanism: Transplants mature, functional hyaline cartilage rather than attempting regeneration.

Donor sites: Lateral trochlear ridge, intercondylar notch margins.

Advantages:

  • True hyaline cartilage
  • Immediate structural restoration
  • Single-stage procedure

Limitations:

  • Donor site morbidity
  • Limited graft availability (under 3-4 cm squared)
  • Difficulty matching convexity/concavity

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft (OCA)

Uses fresh donor cartilage (within 28 days) for larger defects.

Indications: Larger lesions (over 4 cm squared), salvage procedures, AVN.

Considerations: Chondrocyte viability decreases with storage time. Bone integrates, cartilage provides immediate function.

This approach enables treatment of larger defects.

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI)

Two-stage procedure: First, harvest cartilage, culture chondrocytes, then reimplant.

First generation: Cells injected under periosteal patch. Second generation: Collagen membrane cover. Third generation (MACI): Matrix-assisted, cells seeded on scaffold.

Mechanism: Cultured autologous chondrocytes produce hyaline-like matrix in defect.

Indications:

  • Larger defects (2-10 cm squared)
  • Young, active patients
  • Failed microfracture

Outcomes: Hyaline-like tissue in 70-80% of biopsies. Good medium-term clinical results.

Emerging Therapies

Stem cell approaches: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), adipose-derived stem cells. Scaffold technologies: Various synthetic and biologic matrices. Growth factors: BMP-7, TGF-beta, IGF-1 under investigation.

These technologies continue to evolve rapidly.

Comparison of Repair Techniques

Cartilage Repair Technique Comparison

TechniqueDefect SizeRepair TissueStagesDurability
MicrofractureUnder 2-4 cm squaredFibrocartilage (Type I)Single5-8 years good results
OATSUnder 3-4 cm squaredHyaline (transferred)SingleGood long-term if matched
OCA (Allograft)Over 4 cm squaredHyaline (donor)SingleVariable, depends on viability
ACI/MACI2-10 cm squaredHyaline-likeTwoGood 10-15 year data emerging

Selection Criteria

Microfracture: First-line for smaller defects, low cost, single stage.

OATS: Smaller defects where hyaline desired, single stage, limited by donor.

ACI/MACI: Larger defects, younger patients, willing to undergo two surgeries.

OCA: Large defects, salvage, AVN, requires fresh tissue availability.

Evidence Base

IV
📚 Steadman et al
Key Findings:
  • Microfracture provides good short-term results
  • Fibrocartilage fill demonstrated on MRI
  • Deterioration noted after 5-7 years
  • Best results in younger patients with smaller defects
Clinical Implication: Microfracture remains valuable first-line option for smaller defects but long-term durability limited.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2003

IV
📚 Hangody et al
Key Findings:
  • OATS 10-year follow-up data
  • Good-excellent results in 92% of femoral condyle lesions
  • Donor site morbidity in 3%
  • Technique successful for appropriate defect sizes
Clinical Implication: OATS provides durable results with true hyaline cartilage for appropriately sized defects.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2010

IV
📚 Peterson et al
Key Findings:
  • ACI 20-year follow-up results
  • 84% good-excellent results maintained
  • Hyaline-like tissue in majority of biopsies
  • Durability superior to microfracture for larger defects
Clinical Implication: ACI demonstrates excellent long-term durability, supporting its use for larger cartilage defects.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2010

I
📚 Saris et al (SUMMIT Trial)
Key Findings:
  • MACI vs microfracture RCT
  • MACI superior at 2-year follow-up
  • Better structural repair on MRI
  • Hyaline-like tissue more common with MACI
Clinical Implication: RCT evidence supports MACI over microfracture for larger defects when resources available.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2014

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Cartilage Healing Biology

EXAMINER

"Explain why articular cartilage has poor intrinsic healing capacity and how this influences treatment strategies."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Articular cartilage has limited healing capacity due to four key factors, remembered as AAAA: First, Avascular - no blood supply means no inflammatory response, no clot formation, and no delivery of marrow-derived stem cells or growth factors. Second, Aneural - lack of nerve supply means injuries are often asymptomatic initially, leading to delayed presentation. Third, Alymphatic - no lymphatic drainage. Fourth, Amitotic - adult chondrocytes have minimal mitotic activity and cannot proliferate to fill defects. Additionally, chondrocytes are trapped in lacunae within dense matrix and cannot migrate. The key clinical distinction is injury depth. Partial thickness injuries above the tidemark have zero healing potential as there is no access to marrow elements. Full thickness injuries penetrating subchondral bone can access marrow and mount a limited repair response, but this produces fibrocartilage with Type I collagen rather than hyaline cartilage with Type II collagen. This understanding drives treatment strategy: we must either access marrow (microfracture), transplant mature cartilage (OATS, OCA), or provide cells capable of producing hyaline-like tissue (ACI/MACI).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
AAAA - Avascular, Aneural, Alymphatic, Amitotic
Partial thickness cannot heal, full thickness forms fibrocartilage
Fibrocartilage is Type I collagen, biomechanically inferior
Treatment aims to restore hyaline-like tissue
COMMON TRAPS
✗Stating cartilage heals with fibrocartilage without specifying full thickness requirement
✗Forgetting the importance of the tidemark
✗Not distinguishing Type I vs Type II collagen
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the composition of articular cartilage?"
"Describe the zonal organization of cartilage"
"What are the treatment options for a 3cm squared femoral condyle defect?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Treatment Selection

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old footballer has a 2.5 cm squared full thickness cartilage defect on the medial femoral condyle. What are your treatment options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This young, active patient with a moderate-sized defect has several treatment options, which I will discuss in order of complexity. First, microfracture is the traditional first-line treatment. It is single-stage, arthroscopic, and cost-effective. The technique creates 3-4mm holes at 3-4mm intervals to access marrow. However, it produces fibrocartilage which deteriorates at 5-8 years. Given his young age and activity demands, long-term durability is a concern. Second, OATS (osteochondral autograft transfer) is an excellent option for this size defect. It transplants true hyaline cartilage from a non-weight-bearing donor site. Single-stage procedure with immediate structural restoration. Donor site morbidity is approximately 3%. This size (2.5 cm squared) is approaching the upper limit but achievable with mosaicplasty. Third, MACI (matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation) offers hyaline-like regeneration. It requires two procedures but provides durable repair tissue. Good evidence base with 10-15 year follow-up data. May be preferred for a professional athlete wanting optimal long-term outcome. My recommendation would be OATS as first-line for this patient given: single-stage procedure, true hyaline cartilage, appropriate defect size, and good long-term durability. I would discuss MACI if he prefers cell-based approach or if OATS fails. Microfracture is less ideal given young age and activity level.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Multiple options available for this size defect
Microfracture produces fibrocartilage, may deteriorate
OATS provides hyaline, single stage, but donor morbidity
MACI for hyaline-like regeneration, two stages
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending microfracture alone in young athlete
✗Not considering long-term durability
✗Forgetting to mention donor site morbidity with OATS
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the failure rate of microfracture?"
"What are the donor sites for OATS?"
"How does MACI work?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: Why does articular cartilage have limited intrinsic healing capacity?

A: Articular cartilage is avascular, aneural, and alymphatic with low cellularity (chondrocytes comprise only 1-5% of tissue volume). Without blood supply, there is no inflammatory response or access to mesenchymal stem cells. Chondrocytes have limited proliferative capacity and are trapped in the dense ECM, unable to migrate to injury sites. This contrasts with bone which heals through vascular-mediated inflammation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the mechanism of cartilage repair with microfracture, and what type of repair tissue forms?

A: Microfracture creates 3-4mm deep holes through subchondral bone, allowing bone marrow blood and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to access the chondral defect. A fibrin clot forms and MSCs differentiate into chondrocyte-like cells. However, the repair tissue is fibrocartilage (predominantly Type I collagen) rather than hyaline cartilage (Type II collagen), with inferior biomechanical properties and durability.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the indications for OATS vs ACI/MACI for cartilage defects?

A: OATS (osteochondral autograft): Small contained defects (1-4 cm²), single lesion, young active patients. ACI/MACI: Larger defects (2-10 cm²), failed prior treatment, young patients. OATS provides immediate mature hyaline cartilage but is limited by donor site morbidity and available graft. ACI/MACI generates hyaline-like cartilage but requires two surgeries (harvest then implantation) and specialized cell culture facilities.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the key differences between fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage repair tissue?

A: Hyaline cartilage: Type II collagen (90-95%), proteoglycan-rich with organized columnar structure, superior compressive stiffness and durability. Fibrocartilage: Type I collagen predominates, disorganized fibrous structure, lower proteoglycan content, inferior biomechanical properties, prone to degeneration under repetitive loading. Clinical significance: Fibrocartilage repair (from microfracture) deteriorates after 2-5 years, while hyaline-like repair (from ACI/MACI) has better long-term durability.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the "super clot" concept in cartilage repair?

A: The super clot involves augmenting the basic microfracture blood clot with biologics to improve repair tissue quality. Components may include: PRP (growth factors), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) for additional MSCs, hyaluronic acid scaffold for cell retention, and fibrin glue for clot stability. The goal is to create an enhanced biologic environment that promotes differentiation toward hyaline-like cartilage rather than fibrocartilage.

Australian Context

TGA Regulation: MACI products require TGA approval and specialized facility certification. ACI services available at select centers with appropriate tissue culture facilities.

Registry Data: Cartilage procedures not captured in AOANJRR but outcomes tracked through individual institution databases and research registries.

PBS Considerations: Hyaluronic acid injections have limited PBS coverage. MACI is high cost and typically out-of-pocket or private insurance.

Clinical Practice: Microfracture remains first-line in many centers due to cost and simplicity. MACI available at tertiary sports medicine centers. Fresh allograft availability limited compared to North America.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Cartilage Healing Repair
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Cartilage Healing RepairCredit: OrthoVellum

CARTILAGE HEALING AND REPAIR

High-Yield Exam Summary

Why Cartilage Cannot Heal (AAAA)

  • •Avascular - no blood supply
  • •Aneural - no nerve supply
  • •Alymphatic - no lymphatics
  • •Amitotic - minimal cell division

Composition (WATER)

  • •Water 65-80%
  • •Aggrecan (proteoglycan)
  • •Type II collagen
  • •ECM 95% of volume
  • •Rare cells (chondrocytes 5%)

Repair Tissue Comparison

  • •Hyaline = Type II collagen (native)
  • •Fibrocartilage = Type I collagen (repair)
  • •Fibrocartilage biomechanically inferior
  • •Deteriorates under load over time

Treatment Options (MOCHA)

  • •Microfracture - marrow stim, fibrocartilage
  • •OATS - autograft, hyaline, single stage
  • •Cell-based (ACI/MACI) - hyaline-like
  • •Hyaluronic scaffolds - matrix-assisted
  • •Allograft (OCA) - large defects
Quick Stats
Reading Time54 min
Related Topics

Abductor Digiti Minimi - Anatomy and Clinical Relevance

Bioabsorbable Materials

Bone Grafts

Calcium Phosphate Cements