Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cervical Instability

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Cervical Instability

Comprehensive guide to cervical instability including atlantoaxial instability, occipitoatlantal dislocation, subaxial instability, and surgical stabilization techniques.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

Cervical Instability

Craniocervical and Subaxial Instability

Most common causeTrauma
25-80% have AAIRA
15-20% AAIDown syndrome
70% fatalOC-C1 dislocation

Types of Cervical Instability

OC-C1
PatternOccipitoatlantal dislocation - often fatal
TreatmentOC-C2 fusion
C1-C2 (AAI)
PatternAtlantoaxial instability
TreatmentC1-C2 fusion (Harms)
Subaxial
PatternC3-C7 instability
TreatmentACDF or posterior fusion

Critical Must-Knows

  • ADI (Atlantodental Interval): Normal is less than 3mm adults, less than 5mm children.
  • PADI (Posterior ADI): Less than 14mm indicates cord compromise risk.
  • Powers Ratio: Ratio greater than 1 indicates anterior OC-C1 dislocation.
  • White-Panjabi Criteria: Score of 5 or greater indicates subaxial instability.
  • RA patients: Must screen for AAI before anesthesia/intubation.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    ADI greater than 3mm in adults is abnormal
  • "
    PADI less than 14mm predicts poor neurological outcome
  • "
    Powers ratio: BC/OA (greater than 1 = anterior dislocation)
  • "
    Always screen RA and Down syndrome patients
  • "
    Harms technique: C1 lateral mass + C2 pedicle screws

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Assessing cervical instability. Cervical flexion-extension lateral radiographs in (a) can be difficult to interpret. The pre-dental space is obscured by delayed ossification of the dens and superimpos
Click to expand
Assessing cervical instability. Cervical flexion-extension lateral radiographs in (a) can be difficult to interpret. The pre-dental space is obscured Credit: Solanki GA et al. via J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Postoperative lateral cervical spine x-rays showed absence of the osteophytes and normalization of the normal structure.
Click to expand
Postoperative lateral cervical spine x-rays showed absence of the osteophytes and normalization of the normal structure.Credit: Constantoyannis C et al. via Cases J via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Measurements

ADI Thresholds

Adult: less than 3mm is Normal. Child: less than 5mm is Normal. Reflects transverse ligament integrity.

Cord Risk (PADI)

less than 14mm: Critical threshold for cord compromise. PADI is more prognostic than ADI.

OC-C1 Dislocation

Powers Ratio > 1: Anterior dislocation. BDI > 12mm: Abnormal Basion-Dens Interval.

Subaxial Instability

Translation: greater than 3.5mm. Angulation: greater than 11 degrees. (White-Panjabi Criteria)

Craniocervical

Primary Stabilizer

RA AAI Prevalence

Down Syndrome AAI

At a Glance

Cervical instability refers to abnormal motion between vertebrae that may cause neurological compromise, occurring at the craniocervical junction (OC-C1-C2) or subaxially (C3-C7). Key measurements include the ADI (less than 3mm adults, less than 5mm children) reflecting transverse ligament integrity, PADI less than 14mm indicating cord compromise risk, and Powers ratio greater than 1 for anterior OC-C1 dislocation. Rheumatoid arthritis patients have 25-80% prevalence of atlantoaxial instability and require preoperative screening before anesthesia. White-Panjabi criteria (score ≥5) diagnose subaxial instability. Surgical stabilization (e.g., Harms technique C1 lateral mass + C2 pedicle screws) prevents neurological deterioration.

Mnemonic

ADI Values - AC/DC

A
Adult
Less than 3mm is normal
C
Child
Less than 5mm is normal
D
Danger
PADI less than 14mm = cord at risk
C
Cord
Measure space available for cord

Memory Hook:AC/DC - Adult 3, Child 5, Danger at 14 (Cord)

Mnemonic

White-Panjabi Criteria - PADS

P
Points
Sum clinical + radiographic criteria
A
Angulation
Greater than 11 degrees = 2 points
D
Displacement
Greater than 3.5mm translation = 2 points
S
Score 5
Score of 5 or greater = unstable

Memory Hook:PADS - 5 Points And you have instability (greater than 5 = unstable)

Mnemonic

OC-C1 Measurements - POB

P
Powers Ratio
BC/OA greater than 1 = anterior dislocation
O
Occipital Condyle-C1
Distance greater than 2mm = abnormal
B
Basion-Dens
BDI greater than 12mm = dissociation

Memory Hook:POB - Powers, Occipital, Basion: Key craniocervical measurements

Overview/Epidemiology

Cervical instability is defined as abnormal motion of the cervical spine that results in neurological compromise, incapacitating pain, or structural deformity under physiological loads.

Epidemiology:

  • Trauma: Most common cause overall - MVA, falls, sports
  • Rheumatoid arthritis: 25-80% develop AAI over disease course
  • Down syndrome: 15-20% have AAI on screening radiographs
  • Congenital: Os odontoideum, basilar invagination, occipitalization of C1
  • Tumors/Infections: Destabilize through bone destruction

Clinical Significance:

  • OC-C1 dislocation has 70% pre-hospital mortality
  • Untreated AAI can progress to myelopathy and quadriplegia
  • Early recognition and stabilization prevents neurological decline

Anatomy

Upper Cervical Anatomy (OC-C1-C2):

Bony Structures:

  • Occiput: Occipital condyles articulate with C1 lateral masses
  • Atlas (C1): Ring-shaped, no vertebral body, lateral mass articulations
  • Axis (C2): Odontoid process (dens) is the pivot for rotation
  • C1-C2 articulation: Allows 50% of cervical rotation

Ligamentous Stabilizers:

  • Transverse ligament: Primary restraint to anterior C1 translation
  • Alar ligaments: Limit rotation and lateral bending
  • Apical ligament: Connects dens tip to basion
  • Tectorial membrane: Extension of PLL, covers dens posteriorly
  • Cruciate ligament: Transverse + vertical bands

Subaxial Anatomy (C3-C7):

Stabilizing Structures:

  • Anterior: ALL, disc, vertebral body
  • Middle: PLL, posterior disc, posterior body
  • Posterior: Facet capsules, ligamentum flavum, interspinous ligaments

Denis Three-Column Model applies but White-Panjabi criteria more specific for cervical.

Pathophysiology

Mechanisms of Instability:

Traumatic Instability

Mechanism:

  • High-energy trauma causes ligamentous disruption or fracture
  • Flexion-distraction injuries disrupt posterior ligaments
  • Extension injuries disrupt anterior structures
  • Rotation and lateral bending cause facet injuries

Patterns:

  • OC-C1 dislocation: Usually fatal; survivors have tectorial membrane disruption
  • Odontoid fractures: Type II most common, highest nonunion rate
  • Hangman's fracture: Bilateral C2 pars fracture
  • Facet dislocations: Unilateral (25% subluxation) or bilateral (50% subluxation)

All traumatic cervical instability requires urgent assessment and immobilization.

Inflammatory Instability (RA)

Pathophysiology:

  1. Synovial pannus forms in atlantoaxial joint
  2. Pannus erodes transverse ligament
  3. Progressive C1 anterior translation on C2
  4. Vertical settling (cranial migration of dens)
  5. Cord compression and myelopathy

Three Patterns of RA Cervical Instability:

  • Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS): Most common (65%)
  • Subaxial subluxation (SAS): Second most common (20%)
  • Basilar invagination: Most dangerous (15%)

RA patients with cervical involvement need close monitoring and screening before any anesthesia.

Congenital Instability

Down Syndrome:

  • Ligamentous laxity (collagen abnormality)
  • Dens hypoplasia
  • 15-20% have AAI on X-ray
  • Most are asymptomatic
  • Screen before sports participation

Os Odontoideum:

  • Separate ossicle above shortened dens
  • Controversial etiology (congenital vs. post-traumatic)
  • Creates instability at C1-C2

Other:

  • Occipitalization of atlas
  • Klippel-Feil syndrome
  • Basilar invagination

These congenital conditions require lifelong monitoring for instability progression.

Neurological Compromise Mechanism:

The spinal cord at C1-C2 level is approximately 10mm in diameter. The canal normally provides approximately 20mm of space.

Steel's Rule of Thirds at C1:

  • 1/3 dens
  • 1/3 cord
  • 1/3 space (buffer)

When PADI (space available for cord) drops below 14mm, cord compression becomes likely. Myelopathy results from:

  • Direct mechanical compression
  • Vascular compromise (anterior spinal artery)
  • Dynamic cord impingement with flexion/extension

Classification

Upper Cervical Instability (OC-C1-C2)

Occipitoatlantal (OC-C1) Dislocation:

  • Type I: Anterior dislocation (most common in survivors)
  • Type II: Longitudinal distraction
  • Type III: Posterior dislocation

Atlantoaxial Instability (C1-C2):

  • Anterior subluxation: ADI greater than 3mm (most common)
  • Posterior subluxation: Rare, associated with dens fracture
  • Rotatory subluxation: Fielding-Hawkins Types I-IV
  • Lateral translation: Associated with Jefferson fracture

Fielding-Hawkins Rotatory Subluxation:

  • Type I: Rotatory fixation without anterior shift
  • Type II: Rotatory fixation with 3-5mm anterior shift
  • Type III: Rotatory fixation with greater than 5mm shift
  • Type IV: Rotatory fixation with posterior shift

Upper cervical instability patterns determine surgical approach and fusion levels.

Atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation CT imaging
Click to expand
CT imaging of atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation (Fielding type 1). Panel a: 3D CT reconstruction showing C1-C2 relationship. Panel b: Axial CT demonstrating unilateral facet subluxation with arrow indicating anterior displacement of C1 lateral mass relative to C2.Credit: Landi et al., Child's Nervous System (2020)

Subaxial Instability (C3-C7)

White-Panjabi Criteria for Clinical Instability:

ElementPoints
Anterior elements destroyed2
Posterior elements destroyed2
Relative sagittal translation greater than 3.5mm2
Relative sagittal angulation greater than 11 degrees2
Positive stretch test2
Spinal cord damage2
Nerve root damage1
Abnormal disc narrowing1
Dangerous loading anticipated1

Score of 5 or greater = Clinical Instability

SLIC Classification (Subaxial Injury Classification):

  • Morphology (0-4 points)
  • Disco-ligamentous complex (0-2 points)
  • Neurological status (0-3 points)
  • Score greater than 4 = surgical

Both White-Panjabi and SLIC help guide treatment decisions for subaxial injuries.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Cervical Patterns

Three Main Patterns:

  1. Atlantoaxial Subluxation (AAS) - 65%

    • ADI greater than 3mm
    • PADI less than 14mm is critical threshold
    • Transverse ligament erosion by pannus
  2. Subaxial Subluxation (SAS) - 20%

    • Staircase pattern on lateral X-ray
    • Facet erosion and instability
    • May be multilevel
  3. Basilar Invagination - 15%

    • Cranial settling/vertical migration
    • Dens migrates above McGregor's line
    • Most dangerous - brainstem compression

Ranawat Classification (Neurological):

  • Class I: No neurological deficit
  • Class II: Subjective weakness, hyperreflexia
  • Class IIIA: Objective weakness, ambulatory
  • Class IIIB: Non-ambulatory, quadriparetic

Ranawat classification guides surgical timing and helps predict outcomes.

Clinical Presentation

History:

  • Mechanism of injury (trauma)
  • Neck pain, especially with motion
  • Myelopathic symptoms: weakness, numbness, gait disturbance
  • Electric shock sensation with flexion (Lhermitte's sign)
  • History of RA, Down syndrome, or connective tissue disorder

Physical Examination:

Neurological Assessment

Upper Motor Neuron Signs (Myelopathy):

  • Hyperreflexia
  • Hoffmann sign positive
  • Ankle clonus
  • Babinski sign positive
  • Spastic gait
  • Inverted radial reflex

Motor Examination:

  • Test all myotomes C5-T1
  • Assess grip strength
  • Intrinsic hand muscle wasting

Sensory:

  • Dermatomal assessment
  • Proprioception (posterior columns)
  • Cape-like sensory loss (central cord)

Gait:

  • Spastic, wide-based
  • Difficulty with tandem walking

A thorough neurological assessment is essential before any manipulation or reduction.

Special Signs

Lhermitte's Sign:

  • Electric shock sensation down spine with neck flexion
  • Indicates dorsal column irritation
  • Common in RA with AAI

Sharp-Purser Test:

  • Patient seated, examiner stabilizes C2
  • Ask patient to flex neck
  • Palpate C1 sliding posteriorly on C2
  • Positive = clunk with reduction
  • Use with caution

Neck-Tongue Syndrome:

  • Neck rotation causes numbness in tongue
  • Associated with C2 root compression

Torticollis:

  • May indicate rotatory subluxation
  • Head tilted and rotated

These clinical signs help localize the level and severity of instability.

Investigations

Imaging Protocol:

Plain Radiographs

Standard Views:

  • AP, lateral, open mouth odontoid
  • Flexion-extension laterals (supervised, if neurologically intact)

Key Measurements:

MeasurementNormalAbnormal
ADI (adult)Less than 3mmGreater than 3mm
ADI (child)Less than 5mmGreater than 5mm
PADIGreater than 14mmLess than 14mm
Powers RatioLess than 1Greater than 1
BDILess than 12mmGreater than 12mm
BAILess than 12mmGreater than 12mm

Powers Ratio (BC/OA):

  • BC = basion to posterior C1 arch
  • OA = opisthion to anterior C1 arch
  • Greater than 1 = anterior OC-C1 dislocation
  • Less than 0.7 = posterior dislocation

Flexion-extension views are essential but should only be done with supervision if patient is neurologically intact.

C1-C2 lateral translation on X-ray
Click to expand
Open-mouth radiograph demonstrating pathological lateral translation at C1-C2. Arrows indicate asymmetric positioning of C1 lateral masses relative to C2, suggesting atlantoaxial instability.Credit: Landi et al., Child's Nervous System (2020)

CT Scan

Indications:

  • Trauma with suspected fracture
  • Bony detail of dens, C1-C2
  • Cannot clear on X-ray

Findings:

  • Fractures (odontoid, Jefferson, hangman's)
  • Facet subluxation/dislocation
  • Bony erosions in RA
  • Os odontoideum

3D Reconstructions:

  • Useful for surgical planning
  • Assess screw trajectories
  • Evaluate vertebral artery course

CT is the modality of choice for bony detail and fracture characterization.

MRI

Indications:

  • Neurological deficit
  • Assess ligamentous injury
  • Cord compression/edema
  • RA with myelopathic symptoms

Findings:

  • Cord signal change (T2 hyperintensity)
  • Ligamentous disruption
  • Pannus in RA
  • Disc herniation
  • Epidural hematoma

Flexion-Extension MRI:

  • Dynamic assessment of cord compression
  • Shows instability not visible on static imaging

MRI is essential for cord assessment and surgical planning in all symptomatic patients.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Cervical Instability Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for cervical instability, showing assessment pathway from clinical presentation through imaging and surgical decision-making.Credit: OrthoVellum

Pre-operative Planning:

  • RA patients need pre-op rheumatology optimization
  • Stop biologics/DMARDs as directed
  • Airway plan with anesthesia (awake fiberoptic if severe instability)
  • Prepare for prone vs lateral positioning
  • Have halo available if needed for intra-op traction

Non-operative Management

Indications:

  • Stable injuries (White-Panjabi less than 5)
  • Asymptomatic RA with minimal ADI increase
  • Asymptomatic Down syndrome with AAI on screening
  • Patient unfit for surgery

Treatment:

  • Rigid cervical collar (Miami J, Aspen)
  • Activity modification
  • Serial imaging to monitor progression
  • Neurological monitoring

Duration:

  • 6-12 weeks for stable injuries
  • Indefinite monitoring for RA/Down syndrome

Limitations:

  • True instability rarely heals without surgery
  • High failure rate for type II odontoid in elderly

Conservative management is rarely definitive for true cervical instability.

Occipitocervical Fusion

Indications:

  • OC-C1 dislocation (survivors)
  • Basilar invagination
  • Combined OC-C1 and C1-C2 instability
  • Failed C1-C2 fusion with extension

Technique:

  • Occipital plate with midline screws (thickest bone)
  • C2 pedicle or pars screws
  • May extend to C3 or lower

Key Points:

  • Significant loss of flexion/extension (20%) and rotation
  • Risk: Vertebral artery injury at C1-C2
  • Fusion rate greater than 95%

Complications:

  • Subaxial degeneration (adjacent segment disease)
  • Hardware failure
  • Wound complications

OC-C2 fusion sacrifices significant motion but provides reliable stabilization.

Atlantoaxial Fusion

Harms Technique (C1 Lateral Mass + C2 Pedicle/Pars):

  • C1: Lateral mass screws (3.5mm x 28-32mm)
  • C2: Pedicle screws or pars screws
  • Connect with rod, add bone graft
  • Fusion rate greater than 95%

Gallie Technique (Wire + Bone Graft):

  • Sublaminar wire under C1 arch
  • Tricortical iliac crest graft
  • Supplements screws or stand-alone
  • Higher pseudarthrosis rate alone

Brooks Technique:

  • Bilateral sublaminar wires at C1 and C2
  • Wedge grafts between C1-C2 arches
  • Rarely used alone now

Magerl Technique (Transarticular Screws):

  • C2 to C1 transarticular screw
  • High fusion rate
  • Risk: Vertebral artery injury (up to 4%)
  • Needs intact C1 posterior arch

Harms technique has become the standard due to its safety profile and high fusion rates.

Post-operative CT showing C1-C2 posterior fusion with Goel-Harms technique
Click to expand
Post-operative CT imaging following C1-C2 fusion using Goel-Harms technique. Panel a,b: Sagittal views showing screw trajectories. Panel c: Coronal view demonstrating bilateral screw-rod construct. Panel d: 3D reconstruction showing C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement with connecting rods.Credit: Landi et al., Child's Nervous System (2020)

Subaxial Fusion

Anterior Approach (ACDF):

  • Discectomy, interbody cage, anterior plate
  • Good for single-level disc injury
  • Restores lordosis

Posterior Approach:

  • Lateral mass screws (C3-C6)
  • Pedicle screws at C7, T1
  • Rod fixation
  • Used for posterior instability, facet injuries

Combined Anterior-Posterior:

  • Severe instability (3-column injury)
  • Circumferential stabilization

Lateral Mass Screw Technique (Magerl):

  • Entry: 1mm medial, 1mm cephalad to center of lateral mass
  • Direction: 25 degrees lateral, 45 degrees cephalad
  • Bicortical purchase

Pedicle Screw Technique (C7):

  • Medial angulation varies by level
  • Larger screws, stronger fixation

Choice of approach depends on the injury pattern and patient factors.

Complications

Perioperative Complications

Neurological:

  • Cord injury (rare, less than 1%)
  • Root injury (C2 - occipital numbness)
  • Worsening myelopathy

Vascular:

  • Vertebral artery injury (2-4% with C1-C2 screws)
  • May be asymptomatic if contralateral dominant
  • Cerebellar stroke if bilateral injury

Airway:

  • Post-op swelling and airway compromise
  • Delayed extubation often needed
  • Consider ICU monitoring

Positioning:

  • Pressure sores (prone positioning)
  • Brachial plexus injury
  • Peripheral nerve injury

Careful attention to positioning and monitoring minimizes perioperative complications.

Hardware Complications

Screw Malposition:

  • Vertebral artery in C1-C2 screws
  • Cord injury with medial breach
  • Nerve root injury with lateral breach

Pseudarthrosis:

  • 5-10% with modern techniques
  • Higher with wire-only constructs
  • May require revision with graft

Hardware Failure:

  • Screw pullout, rod fracture
  • More common in osteoporotic bone
  • May need extension of fusion

Adjacent Segment Disease:

  • Especially after OC-C2 fusion
  • Increased stress on subaxial spine
  • May need extension of fusion later

Modern screw techniques have significantly reduced hardware-related complications.

Disease-Specific Complications

Rheumatoid Arthritis:

  • Poor bone quality increases hardware failure
  • Immunosuppression increases infection risk
  • Subaxial disease may progress after AAI fusion
  • Wound healing issues

Down Syndrome:

  • Communication difficulties post-op
  • Atlantooccipital instability may coexist
  • Higher fusion rates in pediatrics
  • Cardiac comorbidities affect anesthesia risk

Trauma:

  • Associated injuries delay surgery
  • Halo vest for temporizing
  • Spinal cord injury recovery variable

Understanding disease-specific risks allows optimization and appropriate counseling.

Complication Prevention:

  • Pre-operative CT angiography for vertebral artery dominance
  • Neuromonitoring (SSEPs, MEPs) intraoperatively
  • Meticulous technique with anatomical landmarks
  • Appropriate collar immobilization post-op

Evidence Base

Landmark
📚 White and Panjabi Clinical Biomechanics
Key Findings:
  • Established subaxial instability criteria
  • Combined clinical and radiographic checklist
  • Score of 5 or greater indicates clinical instability
Clinical Implication: White-Panjabi criteria remain the gold standard for assessing subaxial cervical instability.
Source: Spine 1990

Level IV
📚 Harms and Melcher
Key Findings:
  • C1 lateral mass + C2 pedicle screw technique
  • Fusion rate greater than 95%
  • Safer than transarticular screws for vertebral artery
Clinical Implication: Harms technique is now the standard for atlantoaxial fusion due to safety and high fusion rates.
Source: Spine 2001

Level IV
📚 Casey ATH et al - PADI Study
Key Findings:
  • PADI less than 14mm predicts poor neurological outcome in RA
  • PADI more prognostically useful than ADI alone
  • Early surgery before neurological decline improves outcomes
Clinical Implication: Use PADI (not just ADI) to guide timing of surgery in RA patients - operate before PADI drops below 14mm.
Source: J Neurosurg Spine 1996

Level III
📚 Pueschel SM and Scola FH
Key Findings:
  • AAI prevalence 15-20% in Down syndrome on screening X-rays
  • Majority are asymptomatic
  • Recommend screening before high-risk sports
Clinical Implication: Screen Down syndrome patients for AAI, especially before contact sports or anesthesia.
Source: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1987

Level IV
📚 Goel and Harms Technique Evolution
Key Findings:
  • Goel-Harms technique widely adopted globally
  • Fusion rates exceed 95%
  • Lower vertebral artery injury than transarticular approach
Clinical Implication: Modern C1-C2 screw fixation provides reliable fusion with acceptable complication rates.
Source: J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2015

Level IV
📚 Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification (SLIC)
Key Findings:
  • Morphology, DLC, neurological status scoring
  • Score greater than 4 suggests surgical treatment
  • Score less than 4 suggests non-operative treatment
Clinical Implication: SLIC provides structured approach to subaxial cervical trauma management decisions.
Source: Spine 2007 - Vaccaro et al

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

RA Patient with Neck Pain and Myelopathy

EXAMINER

"55-year-old female with 20-year history of rheumatoid arthritis presents with progressive neck pain, electric shock sensation down her spine when flexing her neck, and difficulty with fine motor tasks in her hands. She is on methotrexate and a TNF-inhibitor. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This patient likely has **atlantoaxial instability (AAI)** from rheumatoid arthritis, given her Lhermitte's sign and hand dysfunction suggesting myelopathy.

Assessment:

  • Full neurological exam - document myelopathic signs (hyperreflexia, Hoffmann's, gait)
  • Lateral cervical flexion-extension X-rays - measure ADI (abnormal if greater than 3mm) and PADI (critical if less than 14mm)
  • CT cervical spine - bony detail, rule out vertical settling
  • MRI cervical spine - assess pannus, cord compression, cord signal change

Management:

  • If PADI less than 14mm or symptomatic myelopathy, surgical stabilization is indicated
  • Pre-op: Rheumatology consult to optimize disease control, stop biologics 2-4 weeks pre-op
  • Anesthesia consult - plan for awake fiberoptic intubation given cervical instability
  • Surgery: Posterior C1-C2 fusion using Harms technique (C1 lateral mass screws + C2 pedicle screws)
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
AAI is common in long-standing RA (25-80%)
PADI less than 14mm is the critical threshold - indicates cord at risk
Awake fiberoptic intubation for severe instability
Harms technique: C1 lateral mass + C2 pedicle screws
Stop biologics pre-operatively to reduce infection risk
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting to measure PADI (more important than ADI for prognosis)
✗Not coordinating with rheumatology regarding DMARDs
✗Missing subaxial disease (staircase subluxation)
✗Underestimating anesthetic risk - must plan intubation carefully
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the normal ADI in adults?"
"What are the three patterns of RA cervical instability?"
"How would you position this patient for surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Down Syndrome Pre-Sport Screening

EXAMINER

"Parents of a 12-year-old boy with Down syndrome bring him for clearance to participate in school gymnastics. They have heard about neck problems in Down syndrome. How do you approach this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a common clinical scenario. Children with Down syndrome have a 15-20% prevalence of atlantoaxial instability due to ligamentous laxity and dens hypoplasia.

Assessment:

  • History: Any neck pain, torticollis, neurological symptoms (weakness, gait changes)
  • Examination: Full neurological exam, check for myelopathic signs
  • Imaging: Lateral cervical X-ray with flexion-extension views - measure ADI
  • Normal ADI in children: less than 5mm

Management:

  • If asymptomatic and ADI less than 5mm: Can participate in sports with activity modification
  • Avoid high-risk activities: diving, gymnastics floor exercises, contact sports
  • If ADI greater than 5mm but asymptomatic: Restrict from high-risk activities, annual monitoring
  • If symptomatic or ADI greater than 10mm: Surgical stabilization indicated
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
15-20% of Down syndrome patients have AAI on screening
Most are asymptomatic and do not require surgery
ADI threshold in children: less than 5mm is normal
Restrict from contact sports and gymnastics if ADI borderline
Surgery only for symptomatic patients or gross instability
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending surgery for all patients with radiographic AAI
✗Using adult ADI cutoff (3mm) for children
✗Missing associated atlantooccipital instability
✗Ignoring cardiac comorbidities that affect surgical risk
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What causes AAI in Down syndrome?"
"When would you fuse this patient?"
"What other pre-operative considerations in Down syndrome?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Trauma - Suspected OC-C1 Dislocation

EXAMINER

"24-year-old restrained driver involved in high-speed head-on MVA. GCS 15, complaining of severe neck pain. Initial trauma CT shows 'possible craniocervical dissociation'. How do you assess and manage?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Occipitoatlantal (OC-C1) dislocation is often fatal at scene. Survivors need urgent stabilization to prevent catastrophic neurological deterioration.

Immediate Management:

  • Maintain cervical immobilization - rigid collar, sandbags
  • Do NOT apply traction - can cause distraction injury
  • Full ATLS assessment for associated injuries

Imaging Review - Key Measurements:

  • Powers Ratio (BC/OA): greater than 1 = anterior OC-C1 dislocation
  • Basion-Dens Interval (BDI): greater than 12mm = abnormal
  • Basion-Axis Interval (BAI): greater than 12mm = abnormal
  • Condyle-C1 Interval (CCI): greater than 2mm = abnormal

Management:

  • MRI: Assess ligamentous injury, cord status
  • If craniocervical dissociation confirmed: Surgical stabilization indicated
  • Technique: Occiput to C2 posterior fusion (may extend to C3 if needed)
  • Consider halo for temporary immobilization while optimizing patient
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
70% of OC-C1 dislocations are fatal pre-hospital
Do NOT apply traction - can worsen distraction injury
Powers Ratio greater than 1 indicates anterior dislocation
BDI and BAI greater than 12mm indicate dissociation
Treatment is occiput to C2 (or C3) posterior fusion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Applying cervical traction (contraindicated!)
✗Removing collar before adequate imaging
✗Missing associated injuries (vertebral artery, C-spine fractures)
✗Not checking for survival with intact neurology (good prognostic sign)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you calculate Powers Ratio?"
"What fusion levels would you include?"
"How would you assess vertebral artery injury?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Subaxial Instability - Facet Dislocation

EXAMINER

"32-year-old male dove into shallow water and now has severe neck pain and bilateral arm weakness. X-ray shows C6 anterolisthesis on C7. How do you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This patient has a likely bilateral facet dislocation at C6-C7 with incomplete spinal cord injury (arm weakness suggests central cord component).

Initial Management:

  • Immobilize in rigid collar
  • Complete neurological assessment and document (ASIA score)
  • CT cervical spine - confirm facet dislocation, assess for fractures
  • MRI - assess cord compression, disc herniation, cord signal change

Key Decision - MRI First:

  • Obtain MRI before reduction to rule out disc herniation
  • If large disc herniation, may need anterior discectomy before posterior reduction
  • If no significant disc, can proceed with closed or open reduction

Treatment:

  • Closed reduction with Gardner-Wells tongs and sequential weights (if awake, cooperative)
  • If closed reduction fails or disc herniation: Anterior discectomy and reduction, then anterior fusion
  • Alternatively: Posterior open reduction and lateral mass screw fixation
  • Consider combined approach for 3-column instability
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Bilateral facet dislocation causes approximately 50% anterolisthesis
MRI before reduction to assess for disc herniation
Closed reduction possible if awake and cooperative
Anterior approach for disc herniation, posterior for facet reduction
Document neurological status before and after reduction
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting closed reduction without MRI (risk of cord injury from disc)
✗Missing associated vertebral artery injury
✗Incomplete neurological documentation
✗Forgetting to check for associated injuries (head, chest)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the White-Panjabi score for this injury?"
"How much weight would you use for closed reduction?"
"What is your preferred approach - anterior or posterior?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the normal atlantodental interval (ADI) in adults? A: Less than 3mm. ADI 3-5mm indicates transverse ligament incompetence; greater than 5mm indicates both transverse and alar ligament failure. In children, normal ADI can be up to 5mm due to ligamentous laxity.

Exam Pearl

Q: What PADI measurement indicates the spinal cord is at risk? A: Posterior Atlantodental Interval (PADI) less than 14mm predicts neurological deficit. PADI represents the space available for the cord (SAC) at C1-2 and is more predictive of myelopathy than ADI.

Exam Pearl

Q: How is the Powers Ratio calculated and what does a ratio greater than 1 indicate? A: Powers Ratio = BC/OA where B = basion, C = posterior arch C1, O = opisthion, A = anterior arch C1. Ratio greater than 1 indicates anterior occipito-atlantal dislocation. Normal ratio is 0.77 (range 0.55-1.0).

Exam Pearl

Q: Which patient populations require routine screening for atlantoaxial instability? A: Down syndrome (trisomy 21) and rheumatoid arthritis patients require screening. Down syndrome patients have 15-20% incidence of atlantoaxial instability due to ligamentous laxity. RA patients develop pannus erosion of the transverse ligament.

Australian Context

Epidemiology: Cervical instability in Australia is most commonly caused by trauma (motor vehicle accidents, falls) and rheumatoid arthritis. Indigenous Australians have higher rates of rheumatoid-associated cervical instability.

Trauma Management: Major trauma centres across Australia follow established protocols for cervical spine clearance. Tertiary spinal units manage complex cervical instability requiring surgical stabilisation.

Rheumatoid Arthritis: RA patients on disease-modifying agents require coordinated perioperative management with rheumatology. PBS-subsidised biologics have reduced the incidence of severe cervical involvement.

Surgical Care: Complex craniocervical and cervical fusion performed at tertiary spine centres. Intraoperative neuromonitoring is standard practice for upper cervical procedures.

CERVICAL INSTABILITY

High-Yield Exam Summary

KEY MEASUREMENTS

  • •ADI: less than 3mm (adult), less than 5mm (child) = normal
  • •PADI: less than 14mm = cord at risk
  • •Powers Ratio: greater than 1 = anterior OC-C1 dislocation
  • •BDI/BAI: greater than 12mm = craniocervical dissociation
  • •Translation greater than 3.5mm = subaxial instability
  • •Angulation greater than 11 degrees = subaxial instability

WHITE-PANJABI CRITERIA

  • •Score 5 or greater = clinically unstable
  • •Anterior elements destroyed = 2 points
  • •Posterior elements destroyed = 2 points
  • •Translation greater than 3.5mm = 2 points
  • •Angulation greater than 11 degrees = 2 points
  • •Cord damage = 2 points

SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

  • •Harms: C1 lateral mass + C2 pedicle screws (standard for AAI)
  • •Magerl: Transarticular C1-C2 screws (higher VA risk)
  • •Gallie: Wire + graft (supplements screws)
  • •OC-C2 fusion: For OC-C1 instability
  • •ACDF: Subaxial anterior approach
  • •Lateral mass screws: C3-C6 posterior

RA CERVICAL DISEASE

  • •AAS (atlantoaxial subluxation) = 65%
  • •SAS (subaxial subluxation) = 20%
  • •Basilar invagination = 15% (most dangerous)
  • •PADI less than 14mm = operate before neuro decline
  • •Stop biologics 2-4 weeks pre-op
  • •Awake fiberoptic intubation if severe
Quick Stats
Reading Time85 min
Related Topics

Atlantoaxial Arthritis

Baastrup Disease (Kissing Spine Syndrome)

Bertolotti Syndrome (Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra)

Cervical Facet Arthropathy