Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cervical Spondylosis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Cervical Spondylosis

Comprehensive Orthopaedic exam guide to cervical spondylosis - degenerative disc disease, osteophyte formation, natural history, clinical presentation, imaging interpretation, and management strategies for age-related cervical spine degeneration.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

Degenerative Cascade | Radiculopathy | Myelopathy

95%Prevalence by age 65
C5-6Most commonly affected
25%Symptomatic cases
3-6mConservative trial

Clinical Syndromes

Axial Pain
PatternNeck pain, stiffness, no neuro deficit
TreatmentConservative
Radiculopathy
PatternArm pain greater than neck pain, dermatomal
TreatmentConservative initially
Myelopathy
PatternCord compression, gait disturbance, hand clumsiness
TreatmentSurgical

Critical Must-Knows

  • Degenerative cascade: Disc desiccation leads to Osteophytes leads to Facet hypertrophy leads to Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy
  • C5-6 level: Most mobile segment, thus most prone to degeneration
  • Radiculopathy vs Myelopathy: Differentiate clinically (LMN vs UMN signs)
  • Natural history: 75-80% improve without surgery; myelopathy tends to progress
  • Surgical indications: Progressive myelopathy, refractory radiculopathy

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Do not attribute all neck pain to radiographic spondylosis - it is ubiquitous in elderly
  • "
    T2 cord signal change (myelomalacia) is a poor prognostic factor for recovery
  • "
    Spurling test has high specificity (93%) for radiculopathy
  • "
    Uncovertebral joints (Luschka) are unique to cervical spine and cause foraminal stenosis

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Images of a 40-year-old male patient (a) T2 weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging shows degenerative spinal cord compression, more prominently at C5-6 and C6-7 levels (b) Computerized tomograph
Click to expand
Images of a 40-year-old male patient (a) T2 weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging shows degenerative spinal cord compression, more prominently Credit: Goel A et al. via J Craniovertebr Junction Spine via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
T1- and T2-weighted MRI and sagittal image in 2011 which had revealed cervical spondylosis with mild spinal cord compression.
Click to expand
T1- and T2-weighted MRI and sagittal image in 2011 which had revealed cervical spondylosis with mild spinal cord compression.Credit: Rahimizadeh A et al. via Case Rep Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
X-ray of cervical spine demonstrated marked kyphotic deformity and evidence of spondylosis.
Click to expand
X-ray of cervical spine demonstrated marked kyphotic deformity and evidence of spondylosis.Credit: Martin AR et al. via Evid Based Spine Care J via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Clinical Correlation is Critical

Prevalence Paradox

Nearly Universal: Spondylosis is ubiquitous in the elderly. Radiographic changes often exist WITHOUT symptoms.

The Evaluation Trap

Don't Treat the X-ray: Do not attribute neck pain to spondylosis without clinical correlation (dermatomal pain, neuro signs).

Spurling's Value

High Specificity (93%): Positive test strongly rules IN radiculopathy.

Myelopathy Flag

Cord Signal: T2 signal change (myelomalacia) = Poor prognostic factor.

At a Glance

AspectDetails
PathologyAge-related degeneration of disc, joints, ligaments
Common LevelsC5-6 (most common), C6-7
PresentationNeck pain, Radiculopathy (arm pain), Myelopathy (cord)
EvaluationX-ray first line. MRI for neuro symptoms.
ManagementConservative associated with good outcomes. Surgery for myelopathy.
Key SignSpurling Test (Radic), Hoffman (Myelo)
PrognosisAxial/Radic benign. Myelo progressive.

Key Mnemonics

Mnemonic

PINSRed Flags (PINS)

P
Progressive
Progressive neuro deficit
I
Infection
Fever, IVDU, immunosuppression
N
Neoplasia
History of cancer, weight loss, night pain
S
Systemic
Constitutional symptoms, inflammatory arthritis

Memory Hook:PINS requiring urgent MRI

Mnemonic

HAGSMyelopathy Signs

H
Hand
Clumsiness, wasting, grip weakness
A
Atrophy
Intrinsic muscle wasting (first web space)
G
Gait
Broad based, spastic, unsteadiness
S
Signs
Hoffman, Babinski, Hyperreflexia, Clonus

Memory Hook:Old HAGS have myelopathy

Overview and Epidemiology

Definition

Cervical spondylosis describes the age-related degenerative cascade affecting the cervical spine, involving intervertebral discs, vertebral bodies (osteophytes), facet joints, and ligaments. It represents a spectrum from asymptomatic radiographic findings to debilitating myelopathy.

Epidemiology

  • Prevalence: Increases linearly with age. 25% at age 40, over 85% at age 60.
  • Risk Factors:
    • Non-Modifiable: Age (primary), Genetics (family history of early degeneration).
    • Modifiable: Smoking (accelerates disc desiccation), Heavy labor (axial loading), Vibration exposure (jackhammering), Contact sports.
    • Trauma History: Previous whiplash or cervical injury often initiates the cascade early.
  • Natural History: Generally benign. Most symptomatic cases resolve or stabilize. Myelopathy is the exception (stepwise deterioration).

Pathophysiology

The process begins with disc desiccation (loss of water content). This leads to:

  1. Loss of disc height: Which reduces the tension on the annular fibers and ligaments.
  2. Segmental Instability: The vertebral bodies move more than normal ("wobble").
  3. Osteophyte Formation: The body responds to this instability by forming bony spurs (osteophytes) to increase surface area and restabilize the joint.
  4. Uncinate Hypertrophy: The Uncovertebral joints carry more load as the disc collapses, leading to osteophytes that project into the foramen (Radiculopathy).
  5. Facet Hypertrophy: Posterior joints degenerate, causing pain and encroaching on the canal.
  6. Ligamentum Flavum Buckling: With loss of height, the ligamentum flavum becomes redundant and buckles inward, compressing the cord from behind (Myelopathy).

OPLL (Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament):

  • A distinct but related pathology often co-existing, particularly in Asian populations (Japanese/Korean).
  • Causes severe, hard compression of the anterior cord.
  • Risk: Hard to remove anteriorly (dural tear risk is high as ossification can merge with dura).
  • Presence of OPLL often dictates a posterior approach (Laminoplasty) or corpectomy to avoid dural tear.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

The Degenerative Cascade (Kirkaldy-Willis)

1. Dysfunction

Age 15-45. Annular tears, endplate microfractures. Synovitis of facet joints. Disc herniation potential. Episode neck pain.

2. Instability

Age 35-70. Disc height loss, dark disc (desiccation). Laxity of facet capsules. Osteophyte formation begins. segmental instability.

3. Stabilization

Age over 60. Advanced osteophytes bridging levels. Facet hypertrophy. Stiff spine (restabilization). Stenosis is the main problem (foraminal/central).

Key Anatomy

Uncovertebral Joints (Luschka)

Unique to C3-C7: These uncinate processes form the anterior border of the neural foramen. Hypertrophy/osteophytes here cause foraminal stenosis and radiculopathy. This is distinct from lumbar spine where disc/facet pathology dominates (unlike lumbar spine where facets are posterior). They develop by age 10-14 and are considered adventitious joints resulting from fissuring of the annulus.

Ligamentous Structures:

  • Anterior Longitudinal Ligament (ALL): Strong broad band. Prevents hyperextension. Often site of large anterior osteophytes (DISH).
  • Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (PLL): Narrower band behind bodies. Prevents hyperflexion. Can ossify (OPLL) causing stenosis.
  • Ligamentum Flavum: Connects laminae. Elastic (yellow). Hypertrophy or buckling in extension causes posterior cord compression.

Neural Foramen Boundaries:

  • Anterior: Uncovertebral joint, disc, vertebral body (posterior aspect).
  • Posterior: Facet joint (Superior articular process of lower vertebra), ligamentum flavum.
  • Superior/Inferior: Pedicles of the levels above and below.
  • Contents: Exiting nerve root (Dorsal Root Ganglion is usually in the foramen), radicular artery, venous plexus.
  • Pathology: Osteophytes from the uncinate process compress the nerve root from the Anterior direction. Facet hypertrophy compresses from Posterior.

Spinal Canal Dimensions:

  • Normal: 17-18mm
  • Relative Stenosis: less than 13mm (watch for symptoms)
  • Absolute Stenosis: less than 10mm (high risk of cord injury)
  • Cord Compression: less than 8mm effective diameter. The ratio of canal diameter to vertebral body diameter (Torg Ratio) less than 0.8 suggests stenosis, but has high false positive rate; absolute measurement on MRI is preferred.

Blood Supply of the Cord:

  • Anterior Spinal Artery: Supplies anterior 2/3 of cord (motor tracks, spinothalamic). Prone to compression from anterior osteophytes or disc herniations.
  • Posterior Spinal Arteries: Supply posterior columns (proprioception). Paired vessels.
  • Watershed: The gray matter is highly vascular, but the watershed zone makes the anterior cord susceptible to ischemia from compression (osteophytes). This contributes to the pathophysiology of CSM (Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy).
  • Radicular Arteries: Enter via the foramen. The largest is the Artery of Adamkiewicz (usually T9-L1, but can be higher).

Vertebral Artery:

  • Ascends in the transverse foramen from C6 to C1.
  • Note: It usually skips C7 transverse foramen (enters at C6).
  • Segments: V1 (Pre-foraminal), V2 (Foraminal C6-C2), V3 (Extradural/Atlas loop), V4 (Intradural).
  • Vulnerable to injury during lateral dissection or screw insertion (lateral mass/pedicle).
  • Dominance: Left is often larger than Right. Occlusion of a dominant artery can be fatal (Wallenberg syndrome/Stroke).

Classification Systems

Based on the structure causing compression. The distinction between "Soft" and "Hard" disc pathology is critical for surgical planning.

TypeStructureSyndrome
DiscogenicSoft Disc ProtrusionRadiculopathy (Acute)
SpondyloticHard OsteophyteRadiculopathy (Chronic)
UncovertebralLuschka Joint SpurForaminal Stenosis
LigamentousBuckled Lig FlavumCentral Stenosis (Myelopathy)

Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Myelopathy.

ComponentScore RangeDescription
Upper Limb Motor0-5Unable to eat to Normal
Lower Limb Motor0-7Unable to walk to Normal
Sensory0-3Severe loss to Normal
Sphincter0-3Retention to Normal

Grading: Mild (15-17), Moderate (12-14), Severe (less than 12).

Relevance

mJOA is the key metric for tracking myelopathy progression and surgical outcomes in the literature (e.g. AOSpine studies).

This score drives the decision for surgery in mild cases. It serves as a baseline for improvement.

Clinical Assessment

History

Differentiate the three main syndromes:

Clinical Syndromes of Spondylosis

FeatureAxial PainRadiculopathyMyelopathy
Primary SymptomNeck/trapezius painArm pain greater than Neck painGait disturbance, hand clumsiness
Pain CharacterDeep ache, stiffnessShooting, electric, burningOften painless or vague ache
AggravatingUpright posture, extensionExtension, arm dependencyExtension (canal narrowing)
NeurologyIntactLMN signs (root level)UMN signs (long tract)

Differential Diagnosis

Must exclude mimics:

  1. Peripheral Entrapment: Carpal Tunnel (CTS), Cubital Tunnel. (Double Crush phenomenon: CTS + Cervical Radiculopathy).
  2. Shoulder Pathology: Rotator cuff tear, arthritis. Differentiate with shoulder exam (pain with active ROM, vs neck pain with passive ROM).
  3. MS / AS: Multiple Sclerosis (younger, vision issues), Ankylosing Spondylitis (stiffness).
  4. ALS (Motor Neurone Disease): Progressive weakness, fasciculations, without sensory loss. Painless.
  5. Tumor/Infection: Red flags (Night pain, fever, weight loss).
  6. Parsonage-Turner Syndrome: Acute brachial neuritis. Viral prodrome, severe pain followed by weakness.

Physical Examination

Provocative Tests:

  • Spurling Test: Extension + Lateral Rotation + Axial Load. Positive = Radicular pain. High specificity (93%).
  • Shoulder Abduction Test (Bakody): Relief of arm pain with hand on head = C5/C6 radiculopathy (relieves tension).
  • Lhermitte's Sign: Shock sensation down spine on flexion = Myelopathy/Cord compression.
  • Finger Escape Sign: Unable to hold fingers extended and adducted (Myelopathy, C8/T1 weakness).
  • Grip and Release Test: Normal is 20 times in 10 seconds. Slower in myelopathy.
  • Inverted Radial Reflex: Tapping supinator causes finger flexion instead of wrist/supinator reflex. Indicates C5/6 cord compression.
  • Valsalva Maneuver: Increases intrathecal pressure, aggravating radiculopathy.

Neurological Assessment:

  • C5: Deltoid (Motor), Lateral Arm (Sensory), Biceps (Reflex).
  • C6: Wrist Ext (Motor), Thumb index (Sensory), Brachioradialis (Reflex).
  • C7: Triceps (Motor), Middle finger (Sensory), Triceps (Reflex).
  • C8: Finger Flex (Motor), Little finger (Sensory).
  • T1: Interossei (Motor), Medial forearm (Sensory).

Investigations

Imaging Algorithm

Diagnostic Workup

Step 1X-Rays (First Line)

Views: AP, Lateral, Open-mouth peg, Obliques (foramina), Flexion/Extension (instability). Look for: Disc height loss, osteophytes, spondylolisthesis, sagittal alignment, OPLL signs. Instability Criteria: translation greater than 3.5mm or angulation greater than 11 degrees difference on Flex/Ext views.

Step 2MRI

Indication: Radiculopathy over 6 weeks, Progressive deficit, Myelopathy, Red flags. Look for: Disc hydration (T2 dark), Nerve root compression (foraminal), Cord compression (central), Cord signal change (myelomalacia). MRI is the gold standard for soft tissue and neural compression. T2 sagittal is best for screening; T2 axial for level-specific compression.

Step 3CT

Indication: Surgical planning, OPLL suspicion, MRI contraindicated. Value: Shows bony anatomy, osteophytes vs soft disc, ossification of PLL. High quality CT is crucial for preoperative planning to assess bone quality for fusion.

Step 4Nerve Conduction Studies / EMG

Indication: Equivocal diagnosis, Double crush suspicion (CTS vs Radiculopathy). Sensitivity: variable. Good for ruling out peripheral neuropathy.

T2 Signal Change

Myelomalacia: High T2 signal in the cord indicates edema/gliosis/ischemia. It is a predictor of poorer surgical recovery. Patients with T2 signal change are less likely to have complete resolution of symptoms. T1 hypointensity (dark cord) is even worse (cystic necrosis/atrophy) and indicates irreversible damage.

Multimodal Imaging Examples

Cervical spondylosis imaging - X-ray to MRI correlation
Click to expand
Two-panel imaging demonstrating cervical spondylosis workup. Panel A: Lateral cervical X-ray showing multilevel disc space narrowing and spondylotic changes at C5-C6 level. Panel B: Corresponding MRI evaluation with sagittal T2 reference image (top inset) and axial T2 MRI (main) showing spinal canal narrowing (white arrow) due to disc protrusion and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. MRI is essential to assess cord compression and signal change when myelopathy is suspected.Credit: Jung H et al., Korean J Anesthesiol - CC BY 4.0
Comprehensive multimodal imaging of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
Click to expand
Eight-panel comprehensive imaging of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in a 40-year-old male. Panels a-d: Sagittal views including T2 MRI (a) showing multilevel cord compression at C5-6 and C6-7 with high T2 signal change (myelomalacia), and sagittal CT reconstructions (b-d). Panels e-f: Axial CT images demonstrating foraminal stenosis. Panels g-h: Pre- and post-operative X-rays showing posterior instrumented fusion. This case demonstrates the complete workup from diagnosis through surgical treatment.Credit: Goel A et al., J Craniovertebr Junction Spine - CC BY 4.0

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management Algorithm for Cervical Spondylosis
Click to expand
Clinical decision flowchart for the management of Cervical SpondylosisCredit: OrthoVellum

Successful in 75-90% of radiculopathy/axial pain cases.

Pharmacology

  • NSAIDs: First line (short course)
  • Neuropathic: Gabapentin/Pregabalin for radicular pain
  • Muscle Relaxants: Only for acute spasm (less than 1 week)
  • Antidepressants: TCAs (Amitriptyline) can help chronic pain
  • Avoid: Opioids (poor efficacy, high risk)

Physiotherapy

  • Strengthening: Deep neck flexors, scapular stabilizers (trapezius, rhomboids)
  • Postur: Ergonomic assessment, monitor height
  • Manual: Mobilization (avoid high-velocity manipulation - risk of stroke/dissection)
  • Traction: Short term relief for radiculopathy. Home devices available.

Injections

Cervical ESI: Moderate evidence for short term relief of radiculopathy. Risk of catastrophic injury (cord infarct) with transforaminal approach. Interlaminar approach preferred and safer in cervical spine. Fluoroscopic guidance is mandatory.

1. Initial Presentation:

  • Red flags present leads to Urgent MRI leads to Specialist.
  • No Red Flags leads to X-rays + Conservative Rx (6 weeks).

2. Failure of Conservative Rx:

  • Persistent pain/disability leads to MRI.
  • Radiculopathy confirmed leads to ESI or Surgery.
  • Axial pain only leads to Review diagnosis, Physio, Pain management.

3. Myelopathy:

  • Mild (mJOA over 14) leads to Close observation vs Surgery (Trend is towards earlier surgery).
  • Moderate/Severe leads to Surgical Decompression recommended.

This algorithmic approach ensures no red flags are missed while avoiding over-treatment.

  • Myelopathy: Progressive or Moderate/Severe. Prevents quadriplegia.
  • Radiculopathy: Refractory to 6-12 weeks conservative, or significant/progressive motor deficit.
  • Fracture/Instability: Rarely in pure spondylosis, but possible.
  • Deformity: Severe Kyphosis hindering gaze/swallow.
  • Intractable Pain: Associated with concordant imaging findings.

Patient selection is critical. Surgery treats the compression (neurology), not always the axial pain.

Surgical Technique

Anterior vs Posterior

FactorAnterior (ACDF/Corpectomy)Posterior (Laminectomy/Fusion/Plasty)
Pathology LocationAnterior (Disc/Osteophyte)Posterior (Lig flavum/shingles)
AlignmentKyphosis or Straight (Need to restore lordosis)Maintained Lordosis (Required for drift)
Levels1-3 Levels3+ Levels (Multilevel)
Neck PainBetter relief (stabilizes segment)Can worsen (muscle stripping)
ComplicationsDysphagia, RLN palsy, HornersC5 palsy, wound healing, muscle atrophy

The choice depends heavily on ALIGNMENT. You cannot do posterior decompression on a kyphotic spine because the cord will bowstring forward against the osteophytes. Anterior approach allows for lordosis correction.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Gold Standard for 1-2 level disease.

  1. Positioning: Supine, neck extended (towel roll between scapulae), arms tucked (traction for C6/7 view).
  2. Incision: Transverse skin crease, typically right side (surgeon preference - RLN is more reliable on right but non-recurrent RLN risk exists).
  3. Approach: Smith-Robinson through platysma. Interval: Medial to Carotid sheath, Lateral to Trachea/Esophagus.
  4. Dissection: Blunt finger dissection to prevertebral space. Retractors (Caspar pins) placed.
  5. Level Check: Fluoroscopy needle marker is essential.
  6. Discectomy: Incise ALL. Remove annulus, nucleus, and cartilaginous endplates using curettes/pituitary.
  7. Decompression: This is the key step. Resect Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (PLL) and posterior osteophytes to see cord and roots. Use Kerrison rongeurs for foraminotomy.
  8. Preparation: Burring of endplates to bleeding bone (but preserve cortical rim for strength).
  9. Fusion: Insert interbody cage (PEEK or Titanium) filled with graft/substitute. Trial for size first.
  10. Plating: Anterior cervical plate spanning the segment. Screws into VBs.

The plate increases stability and fusion rates, especially for multi-level cases.

Corpectomy

  • Removal of entire vertebral body. Used for retro-vertebral compression or multi-level pathology.
  • Requires cage/strut graft + Plate.
  • Higher complication rate (construct failure, graft kick-out) than ACDF.

Corpectomy provides excellent decompression but is technically demanding.

Laminectomy + Fusion

  • Indication: Multilevel stenosis (more than 3), Kyphosis, Instability.
  • Technique: Midline approach. Subperiosteal dissection. Laminectomy (removal of spinous process/lamina). Lateral mass screws (Roy-Camille or Magerl technique) or Pedicle screws (C2/C7/T1).
  • Fusion: Decortication of lateral masses + Bone graft.

Laminoplasty

  • Indication: Multilevel stenosis, Preserved Lordosis, No instability.
  • Technique: "Open door" (hinge one side, open other - Hirabayashi) or "French door" (split midline - Kurokawa).
  • Benefit: Motion preservation, avoids fusion complications.
  • Risk: C5 palsy (tethering effect from cord drift).

Posterior instrumented fusion is more invasive but robust for instability.

Complications

Mnemonic

ACDFACDF Complications

A
Airway
Hematoma (emergency), edema
C
Cord/C5
Cord injury risk, C5 palsy, Carotid injury
D
Dysphagia
Common (20-30%), usually transient
F
Failure
Pseudarthrosis, ASD (Adjacent Segment Disease), Fusion malposition

Memory Hook:ACDF risks

Dysphagia:

  • Most common complaint (up to 70% transient).
  • Prevention: Minimize retractor pressure, intermittent relaxation of retractors, use endotracheal tube cuff deflation during retraction.
  • Management: Reassurance (most resolve), Speech pathology review, Nasogastric tube if severe aspiration risk, Steroids (dexamethasone) intra-op may help edema. chronic dysphagia is rare.

Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD):

  • Rate: ~2.9% per year (clinical), up to 92% radiographic at long term.
  • Cause: Increased existing stress at levels above/below fusion.
  • Management: Conservative initially, extension of fusion if symptomatic.

C5 Palsy:

  • Incidence: 5% in posterior decompression (Laminoplasty/Laminectomy), less common in ACDF.
  • Pathophysiology: Posterior drift of the cord tethers the C5 root (which has a shorter, more direct course) causing traction injury. Also reperfusion injury.
  • Prognosis: Good. Most resolve spontaneously over 6-12 months.

Other Major Risks:

  • Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve (RLN) Palsy: Hoarseness. 1-2%. More common on Right side (nerve is variable). ENT scope if persistent.
  • Esophageal Injury: Rare but catastrophic. Can lead to mediastinitis. Immediate repair vs flap. Early recognition is key.
  • Vertebral Artery Injury: Rare. Can occur during drilling or screw insertion. Tamponade vs sacrifice (if contralateral patent).
  • Horner's Syndrome: Sympathetic chain injury (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis).
  • Dural Tear: Risk of CSF leak. Repair primarily or use patch/sealant. Bed rest/Drain.

Postoperative Care

  • Collar: Usually NOT required (plate provides stability), soft collar for comfort 1-2 weeks.
  • Diet: Soft diet for 2 weeks (dysphagia management). Use steroids for edema if severe.
  • Imaging: Erect X-ray Day 1 to check hardware position and alignment.
  • Wounds: Absorbable sutures usually. Strip tapes/Glue. Keep dry for 10 days.
  • Observation: Closely monitor for hematoma (airway) for first 24 hours.
  • Return to work: Desk (2 weeks), Manual (3 months or after fusion confirmed).

Patients are often discharged Day 1 or 2. Educational advice regarding heavy lifting (avoid greater than 5kg) for 6 weeks.

  • Collar: Often rigid collar for 6 weeks depending on bone quality/fixation.
  • Mobilization: Early mobilization Day 1.
  • Wounds: Check for seroma/dehiscence (higher risk than anterior due to dead space). Drain often used for 24-48 hours.
  • Pain: Often more painful than anterior due to muscle stripping.

Rehabilitation focus is on neck extensor strengthening. Longer hospital stay (3-5 days).

Outcomes and Prognosis

Surgical Outcomes for CSM (AOSpine)

Level II
Fehlings et al. • JBJS 2013 (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study of 278 patients with CSM
  • Surgery significantly improves mJOA scores (mean +2.8 points)
  • 80% of patients improve
  • Earlier surgery (less than 6 months duration) associated with better outcomes
  • Anterior and Posterior approaches have similar efficacy if selected correctly
Clinical Implication: Surgery works for myelopathy and earlier intervention is better. Don't wait.

Natural History of Cervical Spondylosis

Level IV
Gore et al. • Spine (1987)
Key Findings:
  • Long term follow up of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients
  • 75-80% of radiculopathy improves with conservative care
  • Myelopathy is progressive and does not spontaneously resolve
  • Recurrence of neck pain is common
Clinical Implication: Reassure patients with radiculopathy. Counsel patients with myelopathy for surgery.

Incidental Findings on MRI

Level III
Boden et al. • JBJS Am (1990)
Key Findings:
  • MRI scans of 63 asymptomatic subjects
  • 19% of asymptomatic subjects had significant abnormalities
  • 14% of those less than 40 had disc herniation/stenosis
  • 28% of those over 40 had disc herniation/stenosis
Clinical Implication: Treat the patient, not the MRI. Findings are common in asymptomatic people.

Dysphagia after ACDF

Level III
Riew et al. • Spine (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Dysphagia is the most common postoperative complaint
  • Incidence up to 71% at 2 weeks
  • decreases to 8% at 1 year
  • Risk factors: Multilevel surgery, female gender, revision surgery
Clinical Implication: Warn patients about swallowing difficulty post-op.

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) vs ACDF

Level I
Mummaneni et al. • Spine (2007)
Key Findings:
  • CDA maintains motion at index level
  • Similar clinical outcomes (NDI, VAS) to ACDF
  • Lower rate of re-operation at adjacent levels in some studies
  • Contraindicated if facet arthritis present
Clinical Implication: CDA is an option for young patients with soft disc herniation and no arthritis.

Evidence Base

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Incidental Spondylosis

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old female presents with neck pain after a minor MVA. X-rays show moderate C5/6 spondylosis. Neurologically intact."

VIVA Q&A
Interpretation: Incidental findings common in this age group, likely pre-dated trauma. Management: Reassurance, NSAIDs, Physiotherapy, avoid collars over 1 week. MRI Indication: Neurological deficit, radicular pain not settling over 6 weeks, red flags, or myelopathy signs.
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Correlation of radiographic findings with clinic is key
Avoid over-investigation (MRI) for simple axial pain
Spondylosis is age-related and ubiquitous
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attributing all pain to X-ray findings
✗Ordering MRI immediately for axial pain
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Cervical Myelopathy

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old male presents with worsening balance and difficulty buttoning his shirts. He has hyperreflexia and a positive Hoffman's sign."

VIVA Q&A
Diagnosis: Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM). Pathophysiology: Cord compression from osteophytes/disc/ligamentum flavum causing ischemia and mechanical injury. Imaging: MRI Cervical Spine (look for compression and signal change). Natural History: Stepwise deterioration, rarely improves. Surgery: Recommended to halt progression. 80% improve, but main goal is creating stability.
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize clinical signs of myelopathy (hand, gait)
Understand natural history (progressive)
Urgency of surgical referral
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing UMN signs in a patient with 'clumsiness'
✗Prescribing chiropractic manipulation (risk of cord injury)
✗Delaying surgery in progressive myelopathy
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Radiculopathy vs Shoulder

EXAMINER

"A 50-year-old plasterer presents with right arm pain and weakness in shoulder abduction. He has a history of rotator cuff tendonitis."

VIVA Q&A
Differentiation: C5 radiculopathy causes pain at rest/night, relieved by abduction (Bakody's sign), and weakness in Deltoid (but also Biceps). Shoulder pathology causes pain with active movement, impingement signs, and normal sensation. Tests: Spurling Test (C5), Neer/Hawkins (Shoulder). Sensory loss: Lateral arm (Badge patch area).
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Overlap of symptoms is common (~15%)
Spurling's test is very specific for nerve root
Injection of subacromial space with local anaesthetic is a useful diagnostic test (Neer Test Relief)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming all shoulder pain is shoulder origin
✗Missing a C5 palsy
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

ACDF Complications

EXAMINER

"You have just performed a C5/6 ACDF. In the recovery room, the nurse calls you because the patient has stridor and neck swelling."

VIVA Q&A
Diagnosis: Post-operative hematoma causing airway compromise. Management: Sit patient up, remove collar, 100% oxygen, call for help (Anaesthetics/ENT). If deteriorating: Open the wound at bedside immediately. Remove sutures, evacuate clot to relieve pressure on trachea. Then return to theater for wash/hemostasis.
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Hematoma is a life-threatening airway emergency
Threshold to open wound should be low
Don't wait for intubation if airway is closing
COMMON TRAPS
✗Sending patient for CT scan (delays treatment)
✗Trying to intubate a compressed airway without releasing pressure

MCQ Practice Points

Level Identification

Q: Which nerve root is affected by a C5-6 posterolateral disc herniation? A: C6 nerve root. In the cervical spine, nerve roots exit ABOVE their corresponding pedicle (e.g., C6 nerve exits above C6 pedicle), so C5-6 disc affects the exiting C6 root. Note: A C4-5 disc affects C5.

Uncovertebral Joints

Q: What is the clinical significance of the Joints of Luschka (Uncovertebral joints)? A: Foraminal Stenosis. These joints form the anterior border of the neural foramen. Osteophytes here compress the nerve root, causing radiculopathy.

Spurling Test

Q: What is the mechanism and utility of the Spurling test? A: Foraminal Compression. Extension and rotation to the affected side narrows the foramen. Reproduction of radicular pain is positive. It has High Specificity (93%) but low sensitivity.

Myelopathy Signs

Q: Which of the following is an Upper Motor Neuron sign seen in cervical myelopathy? A: Hoffman's Sign. Also Babinski response, Hyperreflexia, and Clonus. Muscle atrophy in the hands is a Lower Motor Neuron sign (segmental cord damage) often seen at the level of compression.

T2 Signal Change

Q: What does high T2 signal in the spinal cord signify? A: Myelomalacia. It represents edema, gliosis, or ischemia. It is a predictor of poorer surgical recovery.

Australian Context

Medicare and Public System Public hospital waiting lists for elective spine surgery can be lengthy, often prioritizing progressive myelopathy over simple radiculopathy or axial pain. Specialists can access MRI rebates for specific indications such as radiculopathy or trauma.

Medication Regulations Access to certain neuropathic pain medications like Pregabalin and Gabapentin is restricted under the PBS Scheme, often requiring Authority approval for subsidized prescription in non-palliative settings. Opioids are tightly regulated for chronic non-cancer pain, emphasizing multidisciplinary management.

Driving Guidelines (Austroads) Patients must not drive in a rigid cervical collar. Return to driving is permitted when the patient can comfortably rotate the head to check blind spots and perform an emergency stop, usually 2-6 weeks post-operatively depending on surgery type.

WorkCover and Compensation Cervical spondylosis is a common source of workers' compensation claims. Establishing causation (acute injury aggravating pre-existing degeneration vs natural history) is often complex. The AMA Guides (GEPI) are used for impairment assessment in many jurisdictions.

Cervical Spondylosis Essentials

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definitions

  • •Spondylosis: Degenerative OA of spine (Disc + facets)
  • •Radiculopathy: Nerve root compression (LMN signs)
  • •Myelopathy: Cord compression (UMN signs)
  • •OPLL: Ossification of PLL (Asian population, hard compression)
  • •Disc Desiccation: Early fluid loss in nucleus

Key Anatomy

  • •C5-6: Most common level involved
  • •Uncovertebral Joints: unique to C-spine, cause foraminal stenosis
  • •Cord Signal (T2): Myelomalacia, poor prognosis
  • •Vertebral Artery: V2 segment in transverse foramen
  • •PLL: Behind body, can ossify (OPLL)

Management

  • •Axial/Radicular: 75% improve with conservative Rx
  • •Myelopathy: Surgery indicated (stop progression)
  • •ACDF: Anterior approach, 1-2 levels, restores lordosis
  • •Laminectomy: Posterior approach, more than 3 levels, requires lordosis
  • •CDR: Disc Replacement for soft disc in young

Complications

  • •Dysphagia (Anterior approach)
  • •C5 Palsy (Posterior decompression)
  • •Adjacent Segment Disease (2-3% per year)
  • •Vertebral Artery Injury: Rare but fatal
  • •Dural Tear: CSF leak risk
Quick Stats
Reading Time83 min
Related Topics

ACDF - Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Adjacent Segment Disease

Adult Spinal Deformity

Ankylosing Spondylitis