Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Chance Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Chance Fractures

Comprehensive guide to Chance fractures - seatbelt injury pattern, flexion-distraction mechanism, classification, associated abdominal injuries, surgical management for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2025-12-16
High Yield Overview

CHANCE FRACTURES

Seatbelt Injury | Flexion-Distraction | High Association with Abdominal Injury

L1-L3Most common levels
50%Associated abdominal injury
BonyBetter healing than ligamentous
TLICS 4+Most require surgery

CHANCE FRACTURE TYPES

Bony (osseous)
PatternThrough bone only (classic)
TreatmentBrace if truly bony and minimal displacement
Ligamentous (soft tissue)
PatternThrough disc and ligaments
TreatmentSurgical - will not heal with bracing
Mixed
PatternCombination pattern
TreatmentUsually surgical

Critical Must-Knows

  • Classic seatbelt injury = flexion around lap belt fulcrum
  • 50% have intra-abdominal injury - always assess abdomen!
  • Bony Chance may be braced if no translation and intact anterior column
  • Ligamentous Chance requires surgery - soft tissue will not heal
  • Use compression not distraction during posterior fixation

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Horizontal fracture through ALL posterior elements is pathognomonic
  • "
    Seatbelt sign on abdomen = high suspicion for Chance AND visceral injury
  • "
    TLICS: Distraction=4, so most are surgical unless purely bony
  • "
    Posterior surgery uses COMPRESSION to close the distraction injury

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Comprehensive Chance fracture case showing CT diagnosis and surgical fixation
Click to expand
Comprehensive Chance fracture case (A-E). (A) Coronal CT showing vertebral fracture. (B) Sagittal CT with arrows indicating the classic horizontal flexion-distraction fracture pattern through the posterior elements. (C) Axial CT demonstrating fracture through the vertebral body and posterior structures. (D-E) Post-operative AP and lateral radiographs showing posterior pedicle screw instrumentation spanning the injury - note compression principle used to close the distraction injury.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

CT Findings

Sagittal CT showing Chance fracture at thoracolumbar junction
Click to expand
Sagittal CT reconstruction demonstrating Chance fracture at the thoracolumbar junction. The horizontal fracture line extends through the vertebral body - pathognomonic for flexion-distraction mechanism.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

MRI Assessment

Sagittal MRI showing Chance fracture with marrow edema
Click to expand
Sagittal T2-weighted MRI showing bone marrow edema (hyperintense signal) within the fractured vertebra. Note the paraspinal soft tissue injury posteriorly - MRI is essential for assessing ligamentous vs bony injury, which determines treatment.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Critical Chance Fracture Exam Points

Seatbelt Mechanism

Lap belt acts as fulcrum - patient flexes over belt in MVA. Creates flexion-distraction pattern. 50% have abdominal visceral injury - bowel, mesentery, pancreas.

Bony vs Ligamentous

Bony Chance (through vertebra) heals well - may brace. Ligamentous Chance (through disc) does NOT heal - requires surgical fusion. Critical distinction for treatment.

Associated Injuries

Always CT abdomen/pelvis. Look for: bowel injury, mesenteric tear, pancreatic injury, retroperitoneal hematoma. Seatbelt bruise on abdomen = high suspicion.

Surgical Principle

Use COMPRESSION during posterior fixation - this closes the distraction injury. Opposite of burst fractures where distraction is used. Key exam point!

Quick Decision Guide

TypeDisplacementTreatmentKey Pearl
Bony, minimal displacementLess than 5mm, no translationConsider hyperextension brace/castMust be purely osseous - check MRI
Bony, significant displacementMore than 5mm, kyphosisPosterior compression + fusionBony heals well with fixation
Ligamentous (through disc)Any amountPosterior fusion mandatorySoft tissue will NOT heal
Mixed (bone + ligament)VariablePosterior fusionTreat as ligamentous
Mnemonic

CHANCEChance Fracture Features

C
Compression not distraction
Surgical principle - close the gap
H
Horizontal fracture line
Pathognomonic imaging finding
A
Abdominal injury in 50%
Always CT abdomen!
N
No anterior column failure
Distinguishes from burst
C
Car collision (MVA)
Seatbelt mechanism
E
Extension brace if bony
Non-op option for pure bony

Memory Hook:CHANCE: Remember the 50% Abdominal injury rate - never miss it!

Mnemonic

SBISeatbelt Injury Triad

S
Seatbelt bruise on abdomen
Physical exam finding
B
Bowel injury (or mesenteric)
Most dangerous associated injury
I
Injury to spine (Chance)
Flexion-distraction fracture

Memory Hook:SBI Triad: Seatbelt sign + Bowel injury + spinal Injury (Chance) - always look for all three!

Mnemonic

BLBony vs Ligamentous Treatment

B
Bony heals - Brace ok
Osseous Chance can be braced if minimal displacement
L
Ligamentous - needs Lock (surgery)
Soft tissue doesn't heal - must fuse

Memory Hook:Bony = Brace possible, Ligamentous = needs Locking (surgery)!

Mnemonic

CDCCompression Principle

C
Chance = flexion-distraction
Injury opens posteriorly
D
Distraction is the injury
Posterior elements pulled apart
C
Compression is the cure
Close the gap surgically

Memory Hook:In Chance: Distraction is the Disease, Compression is the Cure - opposite of burst!

Overview and Epidemiology

Chance fractures are flexion-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine, classically occurring when a restrained passenger flexes over a lap seatbelt during a motor vehicle accident.

Historical context:

  • First described by G.Q. Chance in 1948
  • Originally called "seatbelt fracture"
  • Classic horizontal fracture line through posterior elements

Epidemiology:

  • Peak at L1-L3 (thoracolumbar junction)
  • MVA with lap belt restraint most common mechanism
  • Also occurs in falls with flexion
  • Pediatric patients at higher risk (lap belt rides higher)
  • Associated abdominal injury in approximately 50%

The Seatbelt Connection

The lap belt acts as a fulcrum - during rapid deceleration, the upper body flexes forward while the pelvis is restrained. This creates a flexion-distraction force that opens the posterior spine while the anterior column pivots over the belt.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Mechanism of injury:

The flexion-distraction mechanism creates a specific injury pattern:

StructureForce TypeResult
Posterior column (PLC, laminae, pedicles)Tension (distraction)Horizontal fracture or ligament rupture
Middle column (posterior body or disc)TensionFracture through body or disc rupture
Anterior column (anterior body)Compression or neutralUsually intact or minimal injury

Key anatomical concept:

  • Fulcrum at anterior column (lap belt level)
  • Posterior elements fail in tension
  • Unlike burst fractures where all columns fail in compression

Anterior Column is Intact

In a pure Chance fracture, the anterior column is intact or minimally injured. This distinguishes it from burst fractures. The injury is primarily a posterior tension failure with the anterior column acting as the fulcrum (pivot point).

Stability considerations:

  • The posterior ligamentous complex is always disrupted (by definition)
  • This is why most Chance fractures are considered unstable
  • TLICS assigns 4 points for distraction (highest morphology score)

Denis column application:

  • Anterior column: Fulcrum, usually intact
  • Middle column: Fails in tension (disc or posterior body)
  • Posterior column: Fails in tension (fracture or ligament)

Classification

The Critical Treatment-Guiding Classification

TypeDescriptionTreatment Implication
Bony (osseous) ChanceFracture through vertebral body, pedicles, laminae, spinous processBone heals - may brace if minimal displacement
Ligamentous (soft tissue) ChanceRupture through disc and posterior ligamentsSoft tissue does NOT heal - requires surgical fusion
Mixed (osteoligamentous)Combination of bone and soft tissue failureTreat as ligamentous - surgery required

The Bony vs Ligamentous Decision

Bony Chance may be managed non-operatively because bone heals. Ligamentous Chance MUST be surgically fused because the disc and ligaments will NOT heal and will result in chronic instability. MRI is essential to determine the type.

Denis Flexion-Distraction Subtypes

Type A: Through bone only (classic Chance)

  • Horizontal fracture line through spinous process, laminae, pedicles, vertebral body
  • Best prognosis
  • Most likely to heal non-operatively

Type B: Through ligaments and bone

  • Posterior ligament rupture + bone fracture through vertebral body
  • Mixed pattern
  • Usually requires surgery

Type C: Through disc (ligamentous)

  • Ligamentous failure posteriorly
  • Disc rupture through middle column
  • Always requires surgical fusion

Type D (through multiple levels): Multi-level involvement with more complex pattern. Surgical stabilization is always required.

TLICS Scoring for Chance Fractures

Chance fractures score high on TLICS:

  • Morphology: Distraction = 4 points (highest)
  • PLC: Disrupted = 3 points (by definition always injured)
  • Neurology: 0-3 (variable)

Typical scores:

  • Chance, neurologically intact: 4 + 3 + 0 = 7 (surgical)
  • Chance with incomplete deficit: 4 + 3 + 3 = 10 (urgent surgical)

TLICS and Chance

Even neurologically intact Chance fractures score TLICS 7 (distraction + disrupted PLC), indicating surgical treatment. The only exception is a purely bony Chance with minimal displacement where some surgeons accept non-operative management.

Associated Injuries - Always Look!

InjuryIncidenceClinical Significance
Bowel injury15-25%Can be delayed presentation - maintain high suspicion
Mesenteric tear10-20%Hemorrhage, ischemia risk
Pancreatic injury5-10%Part of seatbelt injury spectrum
Hollow viscus perforation10-15%Peritonitis risk
Retroperitoneal hematomaVariableMay be significant

50% Rule

50% of Chance fractures have associated intra-abdominal injury. This is one of the most important facts for the exam. ALWAYS get CT abdomen/pelvis with contrast when Chance fracture is identified. Look for the seatbelt sign (transverse abdominal bruising).

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • MVA details (especially restraint type - lap belt vs 3-point)
  • Mechanism of impact
  • Abdominal symptoms (pain, distension, vomiting)
  • Neurological symptoms

Physical examination:

Spine Examination

  • Palpable gap: Widened interspinous space is classic finding
  • Tenderness: Focal at fracture level
  • Kyphotic deformity: May be visible or palpable
  • Complete neuro exam: Lower extremities and perianal

Abdominal Examination

  • Seatbelt sign: Transverse bruising across abdomen
  • Tenderness: Generalized or focal
  • Distension: May indicate bleeding/ileus
  • Peritonitis signs: Guarding, rigidity

The Seatbelt Sign

Transverse abdominal wall bruising (seatbelt sign) should trigger:

  1. High suspicion for Chance fracture
  2. High suspicion for intra-abdominal injury
  3. CT thoracolumbar spine AND CT abdomen/pelvis

This is a two-cavity injury pattern - never assess just one!

Neurological examination:

  • Complete lower extremity motor and sensory
  • Perianal sensation (sacral sparing)
  • Rectal tone
  • Reflexes (may be hypo/hyperreflexic depending on level)

Investigations

Imaging Algorithm

ImmediateCT Thoracolumbar Spine

Shows osseous injury. Look for horizontal fracture line through posterior elements. Sagittal reconstructions best to appreciate flexion-distraction pattern.

With spine CTCT Abdomen/Pelvis with Contrast

Mandatory for Chance fractures. Look for bowel wall thickening, free fluid, mesenteric hematoma, pancreatic injury. Do NOT wait for symptoms - injury may be delayed.

Treatment planningMRI Thoracolumbar

Determines bony vs ligamentous. Essential for treatment decision. Shows disc status, PLC injury extent, cord/cauda status.

CT findings:

Classic Chance fracture on CT:

  • Horizontal fracture line through spinous process, laminae, transverse processes, pedicles, and vertebral body
  • Widened interspinous space at injury level
  • Empty facet sign if facets subluxed
  • Minimal anterior column compression (distinguishes from burst)

Chance vs Burst on CT

FeatureChance FractureBurst Fracture
Primary forceDistraction (flexion-distraction)Compression (axial)
Fracture orientationHorizontal through posterior elementsComminuted vertebral body
Posterior elementsFractured or widened spaceUsually intact
Canal compromiseMinimal (no retropulsion)Common (retropulsed fragment)
Associated injuryAbdominal in 50%Calcaneus, other spine levels

MRI for Treatment Decision

MRI distinguishes bony from ligamentous Chance:

  • Bony: Low signal fracture line through vertebral body, bone marrow edema
  • Ligamentous: High T2 signal in disc, disrupted PLC, no bone fracture through body
  • Mixed: Features of both

This distinction determines whether non-operative treatment is possible.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Chance Fracture Management Algorithm
Click to expand
Visual Sketchnote Management Algorithm: Emphasizing the diagnostic rule-out of abdominal injury (50% association) and the treatment bifurcation based on bony vs ligamentous injury. Key surgical principle is COMPRESSION to close the posterior distraction.Credit: OrthoVellum

Management of Osseous Chance Fractures

Non-operative candidates (rare):

  • Purely bony injury (no soft tissue component on MRI)
  • Minimal displacement (less than 5mm posterior distraction)
  • No translation
  • No kyphosis
  • Neurologically intact
  • Compliant patient

Non-operative protocol:

  • Hyperextension brace or cast (Jewett or CASH brace)
  • The extension posture closes the distraction injury
  • Duration: 12-16 weeks
  • Serial X-rays to monitor alignment
  • Convert to surgery if progression

Surgical indications for bony Chance:

  • Significant displacement (more than 5mm)
  • Kyphosis
  • Unable to achieve closed reduction
  • Neurological deficit
  • Associated injuries requiring surgery
  • Unable to brace (body habitus, compliance)

Hyperextension Logic

The hyperextension brace works because it closes the posterior distraction injury. By extending the spine, the posterior elements approximate. This is the opposite of bracing a compression fracture where you want extension to open the compressed segment.

Management of Ligamentous Chance Fractures

Surgical fusion is MANDATORY

Rationale:

  • Disc and ligaments do NOT heal
  • Will result in chronic instability
  • Progressive kyphosis inevitable
  • No role for non-operative management

Surgical approach:

  • Posterior approach with pedicle screw fixation
  • Short segment: one level above, one below
  • Key principle: Use COMPRESSION
  • This closes the distracted posterior elements

Compression Not Distraction

Unlike burst fractures where distraction is used, Chance fractures require COMPRESSION during fixation. This closes the posterior distraction gap and restores alignment. Distraction would worsen the injury!

Posterior Compression Fixation

Principles:

  • Short segment preferred (one above, one below)
  • Compression across the construct to close distraction
  • Fusion with bone graft
  • Avoid long constructs unless multilevel injury

Surgical Steps

Step 1Positioning

Prone on Jackson frame. May use some extension to help reduce. Neuromonitoring if neurological deficit.

Step 2Exposure

Midline incision. Subperiosteal dissection. Note widened interspinous space at injury level.

Step 3Pedicle Screws

Place screws one level above and one level below injury. Standard entry points and trajectories.

Step 4Reduction and Compression

Place rod. Apply COMPRESSION across the fracture - this is the key step. The distracted posterior elements will approximate.

Step 5Fusion

Decorticate facets and transverse processes. Apply bone graft. The compressed position promotes healing.

Short Segment Works

Unlike burst fractures where short segment may fail, Chance fractures do well with short segment fixation because the anterior column is intact. The compression fixation approximates the posterior elements and the anterior column provides the fulcrum for stability.

Multidisciplinary Approach

Abdominal injury takes priority:

  • If patient has peritonitis or hemodynamic instability, general surgery goes first
  • Spine can be stabilized after laparotomy if needed
  • Coordinate timing with trauma team

Sequence:

  1. Resuscitate and stabilize
  2. CT abdomen AND spine
  3. If laparotomy needed, perform first
  4. Spine surgery after patient stable (24-72 hours)
  5. May combine if patient stable and OR time available

Communication:

  • Trauma team leader coordinates
  • Clear documentation of plans
  • Consider damage control spine stabilization if severely injured

Don't Miss the Bowel

Bowel injury may present late - initial CT can be negative. Maintain high suspicion with:

  • Seatbelt sign
  • Rising inflammatory markers
  • Abdominal distension
  • Ileus beyond expected post-spine surgery

Repeat imaging if any concern.

Surgical Technique Details

Consent Points

  • Neurological injury: Less than 1% if intact pre-op
  • Infection: 1-3%
  • Hardware failure: Low with compression fixation
  • Non-union: Rare if adequately compressed
  • Adjacent segment disease: Long-term risk

Equipment

  • Pedicle screws: Polyaxial preferred
  • Compression device: In-line compressor on rod
  • Imaging: Fluoroscopy
  • Bone graft: Local + allograft
  • Neuromonitoring: If neurological deficit

Positioning pearl:

  • Slight extension on the table helps reduce the kyphotic deformity before screw placement
  • This gives a head start on closing the distraction

Compression technique:

  • After rod placement, use the rod compressor
  • Apply sequential compression - a little at a time
  • Check fluoroscopy to confirm closure of interspinous gap
  • Confirm restoration of lordosis or neutral alignment

Fusion:

  • Essential because PLC is definitionally destroyed
  • Decorticate facets extensively
  • Use local bone from any laminectomy plus allograft
  • Consider BMP in high-risk patients

Avoid Over-Compression

While compression is the goal, over-compression can cause:

  • Foraminal stenosis (nerve root compression)
  • Cord/cauda compression if fragments still in canal
  • Implant failure from excessive stress

Apply compression incrementally and check imaging and neuromonitoring.

Complications

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Missed abdominal injuryInitial 5-10%High suspicion, repeat imaging if concern
Hardware failureLess than 5%Adequate compression, avoid distraction
Non-union5%Bone graft, smoking cessation
Loss of reduction5-10%Adequate compression, short segment usually sufficient
Neurological injuryLess than 1%Careful technique, neuromonitoring
Chronic pain10-20%Patient education, rehabilitation

Key complications:

Missed abdominal injury:

  • Most dangerous early complication
  • Bowel injury can present 24-48 hours after initial CT
  • Maintain high suspicion
  • Low threshold for repeat imaging

Non-union in ligamentous injuries:

  • Rare if surgically fused with adequate compression
  • Higher risk if non-op attempted for ligamentous injury

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Timeline

ImmediateDay 0-2

Monitor for abdominal complications. DVT prophylaxis. Pain management. Mobilize when cleared by trauma team.

EarlyWeek 1-2

Progressive mobilization. Wound check. May use TLSO for additional support if desired.

IntermediateWeek 2-12

Continue brace if used. Serial X-rays. Core strengthening. Activity progression.

Late3-6 months

CT to confirm fusion. Wean brace. Return to normal activities.

Bracing post-surgery:

  • Variable practice
  • Some use TLSO 6-12 weeks for comfort/reminder
  • Others rely on instrumentation alone
  • Short segment fixation generally stable enough

Long-term follow-up:

  • Monitor for adjacent segment disease (less common than burst due to short segment)
  • Assess for chronic pain
  • Confirm fusion on CT

Outcomes and Prognosis

Surgical outcomes:

  • High fusion rates with adequate compression
  • Low hardware failure (anterior column intact)
  • Good restoration of alignment
  • Most return to normal function

Bony vs ligamentous prognosis:

  • Purely bony: Excellent healing with brace or surgery
  • Ligamentous: Excellent with surgical fusion
  • Ligamentous treated non-op: Poor (chronic instability)

Neurological outcomes:

  • Most Chance fractures are neurologically intact
  • If deficit present, prognosis depends on severity
  • Cauda equina level - generally good recovery

Abdominal injury impact:

  • Associated abdominal injury increases morbidity
  • May delay spine surgery
  • Coordinate with general surgery team

Evidence Base

Original Description

5
Chance GQ • Br J Radiol (1948)
Key Findings:
  • First description of horizontal fracture via flexion-distraction
  • Associated with lap seatbelt restraint
  • Anterior column acts as fulcrum
  • Classic imaging appearance established
Clinical Implication: Historical description that established the injury pattern we recognize today.
Limitation: Case description, no treatment data.

Seatbelt Syndrome

4
Denis F, Allard M, Atlas H, et al • J Trauma (1983)
Key Findings:
  • Documented high rate of associated visceral injury
  • Approximately 50% have intra-abdominal injury
  • Bowel and mesentery most commonly affected
  • Emphasized need for abdominal evaluation
Clinical Implication: Always CT abdomen with Chance fracture - 50% association with visceral injury.
Limitation: Retrospective analysis.

Seatbelt Sign & Bowel Injury

3
Chandler CF, Lane JS, Waxman KS • J Trauma (1997)
Key Findings:
  • Seatbelt sign associated with high risk of abdominal injury
  • Delayed presentation of bowel perforation common
  • Serial exams mandatory if initial CT negative
  • High index of suspicion required
Clinical Implication: Seatbelt sign is a red flag for occult bowel injury. Repeat imaging or admitting for observation is prudent.
Limitation: Retrospective review.

Classfication & Mechanism

4
Gertzbein SD, Court-Brown CM • Clin Orthop Relat Res (1988)
Key Findings:
  • Detailed classification of flexion-distraction injuries
  • Bony injuries heal predictably with extension bracing
  • Ligamentous injuries usually fail non-op management
  • MRI essential for distinguishing types
Clinical Implication: MRI is mandatory to guide treatment - bony may brace, ligamentous must fuse.
Limitation: Retrospective.

Surgical Treatment Review

1
Verlaan JJ, et al • Spine (2004)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of surgical treatments
  • Posterior short-segment compression is effective
  • Compression closes the distraction injury
  • High fusion rates and maintained alignment
  • Short segment adequate due to intact anterior column
Clinical Implication: Posterior compression fixation is the gold standard for unstable Chance fractures.
Limitation: Systematic review of mostly Level 4 studies.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Classic Seatbelt Injury

EXAMINER

"A 25-year-old restrained back-seat passenger is brought in after an MVA. She has transverse bruising across her abdomen and tenderness at the thoracolumbar junction. CT shows a horizontal fracture through L2 spinous process, laminae, pedicles, and superior vertebral body. She is neurologically intact. How do you manage her?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a classic **Chance fracture** at L2 with the pathognomonic seatbelt mechanism and clinical findings. **Immediate concerns:** 1. **Abdominal injury**: The seatbelt bruise puts her at approximately **50% risk of visceral injury** 2. **Spine fracture**: Needs classification and treatment planning **Initial management:** - Complete trauma assessment (ATLS principles) - **CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast** - mandatory - Keep spine precautions - Document complete neurological examination **Fracture assessment:** The CT shows fracture through bone at all levels (spinous process, laminae, pedicles, body). This suggests a **bony Chance fracture** rather than ligamentous. **Next step:** - **MRI thoracolumbar** to confirm purely bony injury and rule out disc/ligament involvement - This determines treatment options **If purely bony with minimal displacement:** - Non-operative management possible - **Hyperextension brace** (Jewett or CASH) for 12-16 weeks - Serial X-rays to monitor alignment - Close follow-up **If any ligamentous component, displacement, or kyphosis:** - Surgical stabilization with **posterior pedicle screw fixation** - Use **COMPRESSION** (not distraction) to close the posterior distraction - Short segment L1-L3 I would await the MRI and abdominal CT results before final treatment planning. The abdominal injury assessment takes priority if any positive findings.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Seatbelt sign = high risk for BOTH Chance fracture AND abdominal injury
Always CT abdomen with Chance fracture
MRI needed to distinguish bony from ligamentous
Bony may be braced, ligamentous needs surgery
If surgery: use COMPRESSION not distraction
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting to assess abdomen
✗Treating all Chance fractures surgically without MRI
✗Using distraction instead of compression for fixation
✗Not recognizing this as a two-cavity injury
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if MRI shows disc disruption?"
"What if CT abdomen shows free fluid but patient is stable?"
"What hyperextension brace would you use and why?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Ligamentous Chance with Neurological Deficit

EXAMINER

"A 40-year-old man has an L1-L2 Chance fracture. MRI shows the fracture goes through the L1-2 disc with complete disruption of the posterior ligaments. He has bilateral lower extremity weakness (4/5 throughout) and urinary retention. Describe your surgical approach."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **ligamentous Chance fracture** at L1-L2 with **cauda equina syndrome** (motor deficit and bladder dysfunction). This is a surgical emergency. **Key points:** - **Ligamentous** = surgical fusion mandatory (disc won't heal) - **Cauda equina syndrome** = urgent decompression - TLICS score: Distraction (4) + Disrupted PLC (3) + Incomplete neuro (3) = **10** **Pre-operative:** - Ensure abdominal CT done - 50% association with visceral injury - Coordinate with urology if bladder catheter needed - Consent for posterior decompression and fusion - Neuromonitoring **Surgical approach:** **Posterior pedicle screw fixation with decompression** **Steps:** 1. **Positioning**: Prone on Jackson frame. Slight extension to help reduce 2. **Exposure**: Midline, expose T12-L3 for full visualization 3. **Pedicle screws**: T12 and L3 (one above and one below injured segment) 4. **Decompression**: Laminectomy L1-L2 to decompress cauda equina - the distraction injury may have caused compression 5. **Reduction**: Rod placement with **COMPRESSION** across the injury. This closes the distracted posterior elements 6. **Fusion**: Decorticate facets, bone graft **Why compression?** The injury is flexion-distraction - the posterior elements are pulled apart. Compression closes this gap and restores alignment. This is the opposite of burst fractures. **Post-operative:** - Monitor neurological status closely - Bladder recovery may take weeks-months - Early rehabilitation - TLSO for 6-12 weeks
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Ligamentous Chance = surgical fusion mandatory
Cauda equina = surgical emergency
Use COMPRESSION to close distraction injury
May need decompression if cauda compressed
Short segment (one above, one below) is adequate
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using distraction (wrong direction!)
✗Non-operative for ligamentous injury
✗Forgetting abdominal assessment
✗Long segment fixation (unnecessary)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the prognosis for his bladder function?"
"Why is short segment sufficient here but may fail in burst fractures?"
"What if he also has a bowel injury requiring laparotomy?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Pediatric Chance Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 6-year-old restrained in a booster seat is involved in an MVA. She has a seatbelt mark on her abdomen and back pain. CT shows a horizontal fracture through L3. Her abdominal CT shows free fluid. How do you manage this case?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **pediatric Chance fracture** with **signs of abdominal injury**. This is a complex multi-system trauma requiring coordinated care. **Why pediatrics is different:** - Lap belt rides higher on small children (even in booster seat) - Higher risk of Chance fracture - Higher association with abdominal injury - Spine is more cartilaginous - may heal better **Immediate priorities:** **1. Abdominal injury takes priority:** The free fluid on CT is concerning. Pediatric surgery consultation is urgent. - If hemodynamically unstable: Immediate laparotomy - If stable: Close observation, serial exams, may need diagnostic laparoscopy **2. Spine management (after abdominal cleared/addressed):** **MRI spine:** - Determine bony vs ligamentous - Pediatric spine has more cartilage - healing potential may be better **Treatment options:** - **If purely bony with minimal displacement**: Hyperextension cast or brace for 8-12 weeks (children heal faster) - **If ligamentous or significant displacement**: Posterior fusion **Surgical considerations in children:** - Growth plate preservation if possible - May use shorter segment - Compression principle still applies - Consider growth arrest at fused levels **Coordination:** - Pediatric general surgery for abdominal injury - Pediatric orthopedics/spine for fracture - Pediatric intensivist for overall care - Family support and communication I would communicate closely with the trauma team and prioritize stabilizing the abdominal injury first, then definitively address the spine within 24-72 hours once she is stable.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Abdominal injury takes priority if hemorrhage
Pediatric Chance may have higher healing potential
Lap belt rides higher in children = higher fracture level
MRI essential for treatment planning
Multidisciplinary pediatric team approach
COMMON TRAPS
✗Delaying abdominal assessment to fix spine
✗Not recognizing pediatric-specific considerations
✗Treating spine before stabilizing abdominal injury
✗Not involving pediatric subspecialties
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you manage if she develops peritonitis at day 2?"
"What are the long-term considerations of spine fusion in a child?"
"How is booster seat positioning relevant to this injury?"

MCQ Practice Points

Associated Injury Question

Q: What percentage of Chance fractures have associated intra-abdominal injury? A: 50% - this is the most commonly tested association. Always CT abdomen with Chance fracture.

Mechanism Question

Q: What is the mechanism of a Chance fracture? A: Flexion-distraction - the patient flexes forward over the lap belt fulcrum, creating tension failure of the posterior and middle columns.

Surgical Principle Question

Q: When fixing a Chance fracture posteriorly, should you use compression or distraction? A: COMPRESSION - this closes the distraction injury. This is the opposite of burst fractures.

Bony vs Ligamentous Question

Q: Which type of Chance fracture can be managed non-operatively? A: Bony (osseous) Chance with minimal displacement - bone heals. Ligamentous Chance MUST be fused - disc and ligaments will not heal.

TLICS Score Question

Q: What is the TLICS morphology score for a Chance fracture? A: 4 points (distraction) - the highest morphology score. Combined with disrupted PLC (3), most Chance fractures score TLICS 7+.

Physical Exam Question

Q: What physical exam finding on the abdomen should raise suspicion for Chance fracture? A: Transverse abdominal bruising (seatbelt sign) - indicates lap belt mechanism and high risk for both Chance fracture AND visceral injury.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Trauma System

  • Major trauma centers manage polytrauma
  • Coordinated general surgery and spine surgery
  • Pediatric trauma centers for children
  • State-based trauma networks

Road Safety Context

  • 3-point seatbelt mandatory in Australia
  • Lap-only belts less common now
  • Child restraint laws well-enforced
  • Chance fractures still occur in back seats

Medicolegal Considerations

Documentation requirements:

  • Seatbelt use and type documented
  • Abdominal examination and CT results documented
  • MRI findings (bony vs ligamentous) recorded
  • Treatment rationale clearly explained
  • Communication with patient/family documented

Common issues:

  • Missed abdominal injury (delayed diagnosis)
  • Failure to obtain abdominal CT initially
  • Treating ligamentous Chance non-operatively
  • Not documenting restraint type for road trauma statistics

CHANCE FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition and Mechanism

  • •Flexion-distraction injury (seatbelt mechanism)
  • •Lap belt acts as fulcrum
  • •Posterior elements fail in tension
  • •Anterior column intact (pivot point)

50% Rule - CRITICAL

  • •50% have associated abdominal injury
  • •ALWAYS CT abdomen/pelvis
  • •Bowel, mesentery, pancreas most common
  • •Seatbelt sign = high suspicion for both

Bony vs Ligamentous

  • •Bony: Through vertebra, may brace if minimal displacement
  • •Ligamentous: Through disc/ligaments, MUST fuse
  • •MRI is essential to determine type
  • •Mixed = treat as ligamentous

Surgical Principle

  • •Use COMPRESSION not distraction
  • •This closes the posterior distraction injury
  • •Opposite of burst fracture management
  • •Short segment usually sufficient

TLICS Application

  • •Distraction = 4 points (highest morphology)
  • •PLC always disrupted = 3 points
  • •Most score TLICS 7+ = surgical
  • •Only purely bony minimal displacement may brace

Key Facts

  • •L1-L3 most common levels
  • •Horizontal fracture line is pathognomonic
  • •Compression during fixation closes injury
  • •Never miss the abdominal injury
Quick Stats
Reading Time90 min
Related Topics

Burst Fractures

Vertebral Compression Fractures

Cauda Equina Syndrome

Acetabular Fractures