Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Clinodactyly

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Clinodactyly

Comprehensive guide to clinodactyly including delta phalanx, bracket epiphysis, associated syndromes, indications for surgery, and corrective osteotomy techniques for Orthopaedic examination.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

Clinodactyly

Angular Deviation in Coronal Plane

1-10% general populationIncidence
Over 50% affectedDown syndrome
Over 30 degreesSurgery threshold
4-6 years for surgeryOptimal age

Clinodactyly Classification

Mild (under 10 degrees)
PatternAngular deviation under 10 degrees.
TreatmentObservation only
Moderate (10-30 degrees)
PatternAngular deviation 10-30 degrees.
TreatmentObservation unless progressive
Severe (over 30 degrees)
PatternAngular deviation over 30 degrees.
TreatmentSurgical correction indicated
Progressive
PatternIncreasing deformity with growth.
TreatmentPhysiolysis or osteotomy

Critical Must-Knows

  • Delta phalanx: Triangular bone with C-shaped bracket epiphysis that spans two sides causing angular growth.
  • Most Common: Small finger (radial deviation) - middle phalanx.
  • Down syndrome: Over 50% have clinodactyly.
  • Surgical indications: Over 30 degrees, progressive deformity, functional impairment.
  • Procedures: Opening wedge osteotomy (most common) or physiolysis for younger children.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Delta phalanx = C-shaped bracket epiphysis
  • "
    Over 30 degrees = surgical threshold
  • "
    Small finger most commonly affected
  • "
    Down syndrome strong association
  • "
    Opening wedge needs bone graft

Delta Phalanx - KEY CONCEPT

The Pathoanatomy

Delta Phalanx: Triangular/wedge-shaped bone (not rectangular).

Bracket Epiphysis

C-Shaped Physis: Spans TWO sides of the bone (normal spans one).

Growth Mechanism

Asymmetric Growth: Bracket tethers one side → Progressive angular deformity.

Imaging

Best View: AP Radiograph. Look for the "C" shape.

Delta Phalanx

Pathognomonic Feature

  • Triangular/wedge-shaped bone
  • C-shaped bracket epiphysis
  • Spans two sides of bone
  • Causes progressive deformity

Normal Physis

Comparison

  • Rectangular phalanx shape
  • Straight linear physis
  • Spans ONE side only
  • Symmetric longitudinal growth

Clinical Impact

Functional Effects

  • Usually cosmetic concern
  • Overlapping digits (severe cases)
  • Grip interference (rare)
  • Keyboard/fine motor (severe)
Mnemonic

DELTA Phalanx Features

D
Deviation
Angular deviation in coronal plane
E
Epiphysis
C-shaped bracket physis
L
Longitudinal
Bracket spans two sides (not one)
T
Triangular
Wedge-shaped bone (not rectangular)
A
Asymmetric
Asymmetric growth causes angulation

Memory Hook:DELTA phalanx: triangular bone with C-shaped bracket Epiphysis that spans Longitudinally causing Asymmetric growth and angular Deviation

Mnemonic

SMALL Finger Clinodactyly

S
Small finger
Most commonly affected digit
M
Middle phalanx
Most common location
A
Angular
Deviation in coronal plane
L
Longitudinal
Bracket physis problem
L
Longitudinal
Growth causes progression

Memory Hook:SMALL finger clinodactyly: most common digit (Small), Middle phalanx location, Angular deviation from bracket physis

Mnemonic

THIRTY Degrees - Surgery Indication

T
Thirty
Over 30 degrees = threshold
H
Hand function
Functional impairment
I
Increasing
Progressive deformity
R
Request
Patient/parent concern
T
Timing
Age 4-6 years optimal
Y
Years
Young enough for remodeling

Memory Hook:THIRTY degrees: Surgery indicated if over 30 degrees, progressive, functionally limiting, or severe cosmetic concern at age 4-6 years

Overview and Epidemiology

Clinodactyly is defined as angular deviation of a digit in the coronal (radioulnar) plane, most commonly affecting the small finger with radial deviation.

Definition and Terminology

  • Clinodactyly: From Greek "klinein" (to bend) and "daktylos" (finger)
  • Coronal plane deviation: Angular deviation in radioulnar direction
  • Distinguish from: Camptodactyly (flexion deformity in sagittal plane)
  • Kirner deformity: Specific form affecting small finger distal phalanx with volar-radial curvature

Epidemiology

  • General Population: 1-10% incidence (variable based on diagnostic threshold)
  • Down Syndrome: Over 50% affected (strongest association)
  • Gender: Equal distribution male to female
  • Bilaterality: Often bilateral (60-70% of cases)
  • Inheritance: Often autosomal dominant with variable penetrance

Associated Conditions

Conditions Associated with Clinodactyly

ConditionIncidenceOther Hand Features
Over 50%Single palmar crease, short 5th finger
CommonComplex syndactyly, broad thumb
CommonSmall hands, asymmetry
VariableSymbrachydactyly, absent pectoralis
Most commonNo other anomalies

Embryology

  • Digital formation occurs at weeks 4-8 of gestation
  • Phalangeal development involves chondrification (week 5-6)
  • Normal physes form as straight transverse plates
  • Delta phalanx results from abnormal chondrification
  • Bracket epiphysis develops instead of normal linear physis

Pathoanatomy and Biomechanics

Normal Phalangeal Anatomy

  • Rectangular bone: Tubular shape with parallel sides
  • Linear physis: Straight transverse growth plate on ONE end
  • Symmetric growth: Equal growth on radial and ulnar sides
  • Normal alignment: Straight digital cascade in coronal plane

Delta Phalanx Pathoanatomy

Key Features:

  1. Triangular/wedge shape: Instead of rectangular phalanx
  2. C-shaped bracket epiphysis: Curves around and spans TWO sides of bone
  3. Asymmetric growth: Shorter side (usually radial) grows less
  4. Progressive deformity: Angular deviation increases with skeletal growth

Radiographic Appearance:

  • AP view (best): Triangular bone outline, C-shaped physis visible
  • Lateral view: May appear relatively normal
  • Physeal shape: C or bracket configuration pathognomonic
  • Adjacent bones: Usually normal morphology

Biomechanics of Deformity

  • Hueter-Volkmann principle: Compression inhibits growth, tension stimulates
  • Bracket physis: Tethers one side while allowing growth on other
  • Progressive nature: Deformity worsens during growth spurts
  • Growth cessation: Deformity stabilizes after skeletal maturity
  • Remodeling potential: Limited in coronal plane deformities

Location Distribution

Most Common: Small Finger (5th Digit)

  • Middle phalanx involvement (most frequent)
  • Radial deviation typical
  • Often bilateral
  • Associated with Down syndrome

Less Common: Other Digits

  • Index finger (2nd most common)
  • Thumb (rare, when present often syndromic)
  • Multiple digits (syndromic associations)

Clinical Assessment

History

Key Questions:

  • Age when deformity first noticed
  • Progressive vs stable deformity
  • Family history (autosomal dominant pattern)
  • Functional limitations (overlapping, grip problems)
  • Syndromic features (developmental delay, cardiac issues)
  • Cosmetic concerns (patient/parent perspective)

Physical Examination

Inspection

Overall Assessment:

  • Angular deviation measurement (degrees)
  • Affected digit(s) and direction of deviation
  • Bilaterality
  • Associated deformities (syndactyly, polydactyly)

Specific Features:

  • Radial vs ulnar deviation
  • Rotational component
  • Nail alignment
  • Skin creases

Syndromic Features:

  • Down syndrome: Flat facial profile, single palmar crease
  • Apert: Craniosynostosis, mitten hand
  • Russell-Silver: Growth retardation, asymmetry

A thorough inspection provides the foundation for clinical assessment.

Palpation

Bony Assessment:

  • Palpate apex of angular deformity
  • Assess bone quality and size
  • Identify abnormal prominences
  • Check joint stability

Soft Tissue:

  • Skin quality and elasticity
  • Absence of contractures
  • Neurovascular status

Palpation helps differentiate bony from soft tissue deformities.

Functional Assessment

Range of Motion:

  • PIPJ and DIPJ active and passive ROM
  • Compare to contralateral side
  • Document any stiffness

Functional Impact:

  • Grip strength (usually normal)
  • Pinch strength
  • Fine motor tasks (writing, keyboard)
  • Overlapping with adjacent digits
  • Patient-reported functional limitations

Outcome Measures:

  • QuickDASH score
  • Patient satisfaction with appearance
  • Functional limitations questionnaire

Most clinodactyly cases have minimal functional impairment.

Measurement of Deformity

Clinical Measurement:

  • Use goniometer with digit in extension
  • Measure angle of deviation from longitudinal axis
  • Document in degrees
  • Compare with contralateral side if bilateral

Radiographic Measurement:

  • More accurate than clinical measurement
  • Measure angle between proximal and distal phalanx longitudinal axes
  • Use AP radiograph with hand flat
  • Document progression over time if serial films

Severity Classification:

  • Mild: Under 10 degrees (observation)
  • Moderate: 10-30 degrees (observation vs surgery)
  • Severe: Over 30 degrees (surgery usually indicated)

Over 30 Degrees = Surgical Consideration

The threshold of 30 degrees is widely accepted as the point where surgical correction should be considered. Below 30 degrees, most clinodactyly is cosmetic with minimal functional impact and observation is appropriate. Over 30 degrees, there is increased risk of progressive deformity, overlapping digits, and functional impairment warranting surgical intervention.

Investigations

Radiographic Imaging

Standard Views:

  • AP hand: Essential - shows angular deformity and delta phalanx
  • Lateral hand: Supplementary - may miss deformity in coronal plane
  • Oblique: Sometimes helpful for bracket epiphysis visualization

Key Radiographic Features:

  1. Delta phalanx identification

    • Triangular or wedge-shaped bone
    • C-shaped or bracket epiphysis
    • Best seen on AP view
  2. Angular measurement

    • Measure angle between adjacent phalanges
    • Document severity
    • Serial films to assess progression
  3. Growth plate assessment

    • Open vs closing physis (affects surgical options)
    • Bracket configuration
    • Physeal asymmetry
  4. Adjacent structures

    • Joint congruity
    • Collateral ligament stress
    • Rotation component

Additional Imaging

  • Advanced imaging rarely needed: Plain radiographs sufficient in most cases
  • CT scan: Reserved for complex deformities or preoperative planning
  • MRI: Not routinely indicated

Other Investigations

If Syndromic Features Present:

  • Genetic testing: Karyotype for Down syndrome
  • Cardiac echo: Congenital heart disease in syndromes
  • Developmental assessment: Global development evaluation
  • Genetic counseling: Familial cases

Isolated Clinodactyly:

  • No additional testing required
  • X-rays confirm diagnosis
  • Monitor for progression

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
clinodactyly management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for clinodactylyCredit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Decision Algorithm

Step 1: Measure Deformity

  • Clinical and radiographic measurement
  • Document degrees of angulation
  • Assess functional impact

Step 2: Classify Severity

  • Mild (under 10 degrees): Observation
  • Moderate (10-30 degrees): Observation unless progressive or functional issues
  • Severe (over 30 degrees): Consider surgery

Step 3: Assess Progression

  • Compare serial radiographs if available
  • If progressive (increasing deformity), lower threshold for surgery
  • Stable deformity can be observed

Step 4: Evaluate Functional Impact

  • Overlapping digits
  • Grip interference
  • Fine motor limitations
  • Patient/parent cosmetic concerns

Step 5: Consider Age and Growth

  • Under 4 years: Usually observe unless severe
  • 4-6 years: Optimal surgical age if indicated
  • Over 10 years: Still can operate, less remodeling potential
  • Skeletal maturity: Closing wedge osteotomy preferred

Step 6: Surgical Decision

  • Indications: Over 30 degrees OR progressive OR functional impairment
  • Procedure: Opening wedge (young with open physis) vs physiolysis (very young)
  • Timing: Age 4-6 years optimal

This algorithm guides individualized treatment decisions.

Non-operative Management

Indications for Observation:

  • Angular deviation under 30 degrees
  • Stable, non-progressive deformity
  • No functional impairment
  • Minimal cosmetic concern
  • Patient/family decline surgery

Observation Protocol:

  • Annual clinical and radiographic assessment
  • Monitor for progression during growth
  • Document any functional changes
  • Reassess surgical indications at each visit

Family Education:

  • Natural history: Most stable, some progress with growth
  • Functional impact: Usually minimal
  • Surgical option: Available if progression or concern develops
  • Prognosis: Good outcomes with or without surgery for mild cases

When to Reconsider Surgery:

  • Documented progression (increasing angulation)
  • Development of functional limitations
  • Increasing cosmetic concern
  • Patient request

The majority of clinodactyly cases can be managed non-operatively.

Surgical Management

Indications:

  • Angular deformity over 30 degrees
  • Progressive deformity (increasing with growth)
  • Functional impairment (overlapping, grip issues)
  • Significant cosmetic concern (patient/family request)

Surgical Options:

1. Physiolysis (Growth Modulation)

  • Indication: Young children (under 6 years) with open physis
  • Technique: Excise bracket epiphysis, interpose fat graft
  • Goal: Allow normal symmetric growth to correct deformity
  • Advantage: Gradual correction, no bone graft needed
  • Disadvantage: Requires remaining growth, unpredictable

2. Opening Wedge Osteotomy

  • Indication: Most common procedure, ages 4-6 years
  • Technique: Osteotomy at apex, open wedge, bone graft, K-wire fixation
  • Goal: Immediate angular correction
  • Advantage: Predictable correction, single stage
  • Disadvantage: Requires bone graft, K-wire removal

3. Closing Wedge Osteotomy

  • Indication: Older children, near skeletal maturity
  • Technique: Remove wedge, close, fix with K-wires
  • Advantage: No bone graft needed, stable fixation
  • Disadvantage: Shortens digit

Timing of Surgery:

  • Optimal age: 4-6 years
  • Rationale: Adequate bone size, remaining growth for remodeling
  • Too early (under 4): Small structures, technically difficult
  • Too late (over 10): Less remodeling, closing wedge may be better

Surgical intervention achieves reliable correction in appropriate cases.

Physiolysis vs Osteotomy Decision

Physiolysis is reserved for YOUNG children (under 6 years) with substantial remaining growth. It works by excising the bracket epiphysis and allowing normal symmetric physeal growth to gradually correct the deformity. Opening wedge osteotomy is the most common procedure for ages 4-6 years, providing immediate predictable correction with bone grafting.

Surgical Technique

Opening Wedge Osteotomy Technique

Indications:

  • Age 4-6 years (most common)
  • Angular deformity over 30 degrees
  • Open growth plates with limited remaining growth
  • Desire for immediate correction

Preoperative Planning:

  • AP radiograph to measure deformity
  • Calculate wedge angle needed
  • Template correction
  • Plan bone graft harvest site (iliac crest or olecranon)

Surgical Steps:

  1. Exposure

    • Dorsal longitudinal incision over affected phalanx
    • Identify and protect digital nerves (radial and ulnar)
    • Incise periosteum longitudinally
    • Elevate periosteum from bone
  2. Osteotomy

    • Create osteotomy at apex of deformity (usually mid-shaft)
    • Use small sagittal saw or osteotome
    • Create transverse cut perpendicular to long axis
    • Incomplete osteotomy - leave hinge on concave (shorter) side
  3. Opening Wedge

    • Gently open osteotomy on long (convex) side
    • Use small lamina spreader or osteotomes
    • Open to templated angle
    • Check alignment clinically and with fluoroscopy
  4. Bone Grafting

    • Harvest autograft (iliac crest or olecranon) OR use allograft
    • Insert graft into wedge defect
    • Ensure stable graft position
    • Goal: Maintain correction and achieve union
  5. Fixation

    • Insert smooth K-wires (usually 2)
    • Cross configuration for rotational stability
    • Wires across osteotomy site
    • Leave wires out through skin for later removal
    • Alternative: Absorbable pins in young children
  6. Closure

    • Close periosteum over bone and graft
    • Subcutaneous and skin closure
    • Apply dorsal splint

Technical Pearls:

  • Maintain hinge on concave side for stability
  • Avoid neurovascular injury - stay dorsal
  • Adequate bone graft to fill defect
  • Crossed K-wires prevent rotation
  • Slight overcorrection acceptable (5-10 degrees)

Opening wedge provides immediate, predictable correction.

Physiolysis (Bracket Epiphysis Excision)

Indications:

  • Young children (under 6 years)
  • Substantial remaining growth
  • Progressive deformity
  • Desire to avoid osteotomy

Principle:

  • Excise abnormal bracket epiphysis
  • Interpose fat graft to prevent recurrence
  • Allow normal symmetric physeal growth
  • Deformity corrects gradually over 2-3 years

Surgical Steps:

  1. Exposure

    • Longitudinal dorsal incision
    • Protect digital nerves
    • Expose affected phalanx
  2. Physeal Excision

    • Identify C-shaped bracket epiphysis
    • Use small curette and rongeur
    • Excise entire bracket epiphysis
    • Remove all abnormal physeal tissue
    • Create trough where bracket was
  3. Fat Interposition

    • Harvest fat graft (usually from incision site)
    • Place fat in trough
    • Goal: Prevent physeal tethering recurrence
    • Allows normal growth resumption
  4. Closure

    • Standard closure
    • Splint for comfort

Expected Outcome:

  • Gradual correction over months to years
  • Continued monitoring needed
  • May need secondary osteotomy if inadequate correction
  • Unpredictable compared to osteotomy

Physiolysis relies on growth for correction - only suitable for young children.

Closing Wedge Osteotomy

Indications:

  • Older children approaching skeletal maturity
  • Closed or closing growth plates
  • Desire to avoid bone graft
  • Acceptable to shorten digit slightly

Technique:

  1. Exposure

    • Standard dorsal approach
    • Protect neurovascular structures
  2. Wedge Resection

    • Mark wedge based on templating
    • Base on convex (long) side
    • Remove wedge of bone with saw
    • Aim for slight overcorrection
  3. Closure

    • Bring ends together
    • Fix with crossed K-wires
    • Check alignment
  4. Fixation and Closure

    • K-wires provide stable fixation
    • Standard wound closure
    • Splinting

Advantages:

  • No bone graft needed
  • Stable construct
  • Predictable correction

Disadvantage:

  • Shortens digit (usually 2-3mm, minimal functional impact)

Closing wedge is ideal for older children with limited growth remaining.

Hinge on Concave Side

When performing opening wedge osteotomy, create an INCOMPLETE cut leaving a hinge on the concave (shorter) side. This provides stability and prevents overcorrection while allowing controlled opening of the wedge on the convex side.

Complications

Intraoperative Complications

  • Neurovascular injury: Digital nerves at risk - stay dorsal, identify and protect
  • Complete osteotomy: Loss of hinge - leads to instability
  • Inadequate correction: Undercorrection - may need revision
  • Overcorrection: Usually minor, can remodel
  • Bone graft dislodgment: Ensure stable graft position

Early Postoperative Complications (under 6 weeks)

Wound Problems

Infection/Dehiscence

  • Wound infection: 1-2% incidence
  • Dehiscence over K-wires
  • Pin site infection
  • Treatment: Local wound care, antibiotics

Fixation Issues

Loss of Fixation

  • K-wire migration or breakage
  • Loss of correction
  • Rare with proper technique
  • May require revision fixation

Vascular

Rare but Serious

  • Digital artery injury
  • Compromise of digit perfusion
  • Immediate recognition critical
  • Urgent exploration if suspected

Late Complications (over 6 weeks)

Recurrent Deformity:

  • Incidence: 10-20% after physiolysis (higher than osteotomy)
  • Causes: Incomplete physeal excision, growth recurrence
  • Management: Observation vs revision osteotomy

Nonunion:

  • Rare: under 5% with adequate bone graft
  • Risk factors: Inadequate graft, excessive motion
  • Management: Revision grafting if symptomatic

Angular Deformity:

  • Undercorrection: Most common issue (10-15%)
  • Overcorrection: Less common, usually minor
  • Management: Revision osteotomy if severe, observe if mild

Stiffness:

  • PIPJ stiffness: 10-20% have some stiffness
  • Usually mild: 10-20 degree loss
  • Prevention: Early ROM after K-wire removal
  • Management: Hand therapy, rare need for manipulation

Growth Disturbance:

  • Physeal damage: Rare with careful technique
  • Shortening: Expected with closing wedge (2-3mm)
  • Angular deformity: From asymmetric growth arrest

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Immediate Postoperative (0-4 weeks)

Immobilization:

  • Dorsal blocking splint
  • Include MCPJ, PIPJ, and DIPJ of affected digit
  • Buddy tape to adjacent digit for stability
  • Elevate hand for first 48-72 hours

Wound Care:

  • K-wires left protruding through skin
  • Pin site care: Clean with saline daily
  • Monitor for infection signs
  • Keep splint clean and dry

Pain Management:

  • Usually minimal pain after first 2-3 days
  • Paracetamol or ibuprofen sufficient
  • Ice therapy for swelling

Intermediate Phase (4-6 weeks)

Radiographic Assessment:

  • X-ray at 4 weeks to assess healing
  • Check alignment maintenance
  • Assess bone graft incorporation

K-wire Removal:

  • Usually 4-6 weeks postoperatively
  • Once radiographic union evident
  • Can remove in clinic (no anesthesia usually needed in cooperative child)
  • Continue splinting part-time after removal

Late Phase (6 weeks to 3 months)

Splint Weaning:

  • Gradual weaning after K-wire removal
  • Night splinting for additional 2-4 weeks
  • Progressive return to activities

Range of Motion:

  • Begin gentle active ROM after K-wire removal
  • Focus on PIPJ and DIPJ motion
  • Buddy tape during activities
  • Hand therapy if significant stiffness

Strengthening:

  • Progressive strengthening at 8-10 weeks
  • Age-appropriate activities
  • Return to unrestricted activity at 12 weeks

Long-term Follow-up

  • 3 months: Clinical and radiographic assessment
  • 6 months: Assess final alignment and function
  • Annual: Monitor through skeletal maturity for recurrence
  • Skeletal maturity: Final assessment, discharge if stable

Outcomes and Prognosis

Expected Outcomes

Opening Wedge Osteotomy:

  • Correction: Excellent angular correction in over 90%
  • Recurrence: Low (under 5%) with adequate technique
  • Function: Minimal impact, good ROM
  • Satisfaction: High patient/parent satisfaction

Physiolysis:

  • Correction: Variable, 60-80% achieve satisfactory correction
  • Recurrence: Higher (10-20%) than osteotomy
  • Gradual: Correction occurs over 2-3 years
  • May need secondary procedure: 15-20% require later osteotomy

Non-operative (Observation):

  • Mild deformity (under 30 degrees): Usually stable, good function
  • Progression: 10-20% progress during growth spurts
  • Functional impact: Minimal in most cases
  • Satisfaction: Good for mild deformities

Prognostic Factors

Factors Affecting Surgical Outcome

FactorGood OutcomePoorer Outcome
Moderate deformity (30-45 degrees)Severe deformity (over 60 degrees)
4-6 yearsVery young (under 3) or late (over 10)
Opening wedge osteotomyPhysiolysis (unpredictable)
Autograft iliac crestNo graft or inadequate graft
Isolated clinodactylySyndromic (may have other issues)

Functional Outcomes

  • Range of Motion: Usually normal or near-normal (within 10 degrees of contralateral)
  • Grip Strength: Not affected by surgery
  • Fine Motor: Returns to baseline
  • Cosmesis: Significant improvement, scar usually inconspicuous
  • Patient Satisfaction: High (over 85% satisfied or very satisfied)

Long-term Prognosis

  • Excellent prognosis for isolated clinodactyly with surgery
  • Low risk of recurrence with opening wedge technique
  • Normal hand function expected
  • No increased risk of arthritis from surgery
  • Psychosocial impact: Improved confidence with correction

Evidence Base

Level IV
📚 Caouette-Laberge L et al
Key Findings:
  • Opening wedge osteotomy outcomes in 35 patients
  • Mean correction of 25 degrees achieved
  • Low complication rate (under 10%)
  • High satisfaction with cosmetic result
Clinical Implication: Opening wedge osteotomy is effective for moderate to severe clinodactyly with predictable correction and low complication rates.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1994

Landmark
📚 Wood VE
Key Findings:
  • Described pathoanatomy of delta phalanx
  • C-shaped bracket epiphysis is hallmark
  • Classification based on physeal morphology
  • Surgical principles for correction
Clinical Implication: Delta phalanx with bracket epiphysis is the pathoanatomic basis of clinodactyly - understanding this guides surgical treatment.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1984

Level IV
📚 Ogino T
Key Findings:
  • Physiolysis outcomes in young children
  • Gradual correction over 2-3 years
  • Recurrence rate 15-20%
  • Best results in children under 6 years
Clinical Implication: Physiolysis can achieve gradual correction in young children but has higher recurrence than osteotomy and unpredictable results.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 1990

Level III
📚 Kato H et al
Key Findings:
  • Comparison of surgical techniques
  • Opening wedge superior to closing wedge for correction
  • Bone graft incorporation rate over 95%
  • Minimal functional deficit long-term
Clinical Implication: Opening wedge osteotomy with bone grafting achieves excellent correction without significant digit shortening.
Source: J Hand Surg Am 2002

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Classic Small Finger Clinodactyly

EXAMINER

"A 5-year-old child with Down syndrome presents with bilateral small finger radial deviation. Radiographs show delta phalanx of middle phalanx with 35 degrees angulation. Parents are concerned about appearance. What is your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is clinodactyly of the small finger - angular deviation in the coronal plane - with the pathoanatomic finding of a delta phalanx with C-shaped bracket epiphysis. The association with Down syndrome is classic as over 50% of children with trisomy 21 have clinodactyly. With 35 degrees of angulation, this exceeds the 30 degree threshold where surgery is typically indicated. I would take a systematic approach. First, I would assess functional impact - check for overlapping digits, grip interference, and fine motor limitations. Second, I would evaluate cosmetic concerns and family expectations. My recommendation would be surgical correction with opening wedge osteotomy, as the child is age 5 which is optimal timing (4-6 years). The procedure involves creating an osteotomy at the apex of deformity, opening the wedge on the long side, bone grafting with iliac crest or olecranon autograft, and fixation with crossed K-wires. I would counsel parents about expected excellent correction (over 90%), low recurrence (under 5%), and 4-6 weeks in splint with K-wire removal at that time.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Delta phalanx = C-shaped bracket epiphysis
Over 30 degrees = surgical threshold
Down syndrome in over 50%
Opening wedge osteotomy standard
Age 4-6 years optimal timing
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing delta phalanx as key finding
✗Recommending observation despite over 30 degrees
✗Choosing physiolysis in older child (age 5)
✗Forgetting bone graft requirement
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is a delta phalanx?"
"What is the difference between physiolysis and osteotomy?"
"When would you use closing wedge instead?"
"What are complications of opening wedge osteotomy?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Progressive Clinodactyly - Timing Decision

EXAMINER

"A 3-year-old child presents with small finger clinodactyly. Current deformity is 20 degrees on radiograph, but parent brings old X-ray from age 1 showing only 10 degrees. The deformity is clearly progressive. What is your recommendation?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is progressive clinodactyly - the deformity has doubled from 10 to 20 degrees over 2 years, which is concerning as it suggests continued progression with growth. While the current 20 degrees is below the typical 30 degree surgical threshold, the progressive nature changes my management. I have two options. First, I could perform physiolysis now - the child is young (age 3) with substantial remaining growth, making this technically feasible. Physiolysis involves excising the bracket epiphysis and interposing fat graft, allowing normal symmetric growth to correct deformity over 2-3 years. However, it has higher recurrence (10-20%) and unpredictable results. Second, and what I would prefer, is close observation with serial radiographs every 6 months, planning opening wedge osteotomy if it reaches 30 degrees or when child reaches optimal age of 4-6 years - which is only 1-3 years away. Opening wedge provides more predictable correction. I would counsel parents about both options, emphasizing that progression is an indication for earlier intervention, but waiting until age 4 for osteotomy may provide best outcome.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Progressive deformity lowers surgical threshold
Physiolysis option if very young
Opening wedge preferred at age 4-6
Serial X-rays to monitor progression
Shared decision-making with family
COMMON TRAPS
✗Ignoring progression and just observing
✗Operating too early (age 3) with osteotomy
✗Not offering any intervention despite progression
✗Not discussing unpredictability of physiolysis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How does physiolysis work?"
"What is the recurrence rate of physiolysis?"
"At what age would you definitively recommend surgery?"
"What if parents refuse all surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Opening Wedge Osteotomy Technique

EXAMINER

"You are performing opening wedge osteotomy for 40 degrees clinodactyly in a 5-year-old. After making the osteotomy, you open the wedge but the correction seems unstable. What are the potential issues and how do you manage?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Instability after opening the wedge suggests I may have created a complete osteotomy instead of maintaining a hinge on the concave side. Let me systematically address this. The key technical principle is to create an INCOMPLETE osteotomy leaving an intact hinge on the concave (short, radial) side while opening the convex (long, ulnar) side. If I have inadvertently created a complete cut, I have lost that inherent stability. My management would be: First, assess the situation - is there any periosteal hinge remaining? Second, proceed with bone grafting - insert autograft from iliac crest to fill the wedge defect and provide structural support. Third, use stable fixation - I would use TWO crossed K-wires in this scenario rather than parallel wires, as the crossed configuration provides better rotational stability when the hinge is lost. Fourth, ensure the wires span the osteotomy site and engage good bone proximally and distally. Fifth, check alignment with fluoroscopy - confirm correction is maintained. Going forward, I would emphasize careful technique to preserve the hinge, using gentle saw cuts and checking depth frequently to avoid complete transection.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Incomplete osteotomy - hinge on concave side
Complete cut = loss of stability
Crossed K-wires for rotational control
Bone graft provides structural support
Fluoroscopy confirms alignment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing the technical error
✗Inadequate fixation with single K-wire
✗Not using bone graft
✗Accepting the instability and hoping it heals
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why leave a hinge on the concave side?"
"What type of bone graft do you use?"
"How long do you leave K-wires in?"
"What if the K-wire breaks before union?"

Australian Context

Clinodactyly management in Australia follows international best practice guidelines. Pediatric hand surgery services are available through major metropolitan children's hospitals in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth. Regional centers may have visiting pediatric hand surgeons or utilize telehealth for initial consultation.

The association between Down syndrome and clinodactyly is well-recognized in Australian practice, with screening and developmental follow-up provided through specialized Down syndrome clinics in public hospital systems. Early genetic diagnosis and multidisciplinary care facilitate appropriate referral for hand surgery assessment when clinodactyly is functionally or cosmetically significant.

Surgical correction with opening wedge osteotomy is typically performed as a day surgery procedure under general anesthesia. Bone graft harvest from iliac crest is standard practice in Australian centers. Postoperative hand therapy services are available through public hospital occupational therapy departments and private hand therapy clinics for cases requiring ROM rehabilitation.

Public hospital waiting lists for elective pediatric hand surgery may be 3-6 months depending on location and urgency. Private sector option provides earlier access. Medicare coverage applies for functionally indicated surgery (over 30 degrees or progressive deformity), while purely cosmetic cases may have limited rebates.

Long-term follow-up through skeletal maturity is standard practice to monitor for recurrence or growth-related issues. Telehealth has improved access for regional families requiring serial radiographic and clinical monitoring.

CLINODACTYLY

High-Yield Exam Summary

DEFINITION & PATHOANATOMY

  • •Angular deviation in CORONAL plane
  • •Delta phalanx = triangular bone
  • •C-shaped BRACKET epiphysis (2 sides)
  • •Normal physis = straight (1 side only)
  • •Asymmetric growth = progressive deformity

EPIDEMIOLOGY

  • •Incidence: 1-10% general population
  • •Down syndrome: Over 50%
  • •Small finger most common (radial deviation)
  • •Middle phalanx typical location
  • •Often bilateral (60-70%)

SURGICAL INDICATIONS

  • •Over 30 degrees angulation
  • •Progressive deformity (documented on X-rays)
  • •Functional impairment (overlap, grip)
  • •Significant cosmetic concern
  • •Age 4-6 years optimal for surgery

SURGICAL OPTIONS

  • •Opening wedge: Age 4-6, needs bone graft
  • •Physiolysis: Age under 6, unpredictable
  • •Closing wedge: Older child, no graft
  • •Bone graft: Iliac crest or olecranon
  • •Fixation: Crossed K-wires x 4-6 weeks

OPENING WEDGE TECHNIQUE

  • •Osteotomy at apex of deformity
  • •INCOMPLETE cut - hinge on concave side
  • •Open wedge on convex (long) side
  • •Bone graft to fill defect
  • •Crossed K-wires for stability

COMPLICATIONS

  • •Recurrence: 10-20% (physiolysis higher)
  • •Undercorrection: Most common issue
  • •Stiffness: 10-20% (usually mild)
  • •Nonunion: Under 5% with graft
  • •Neurovascular injury: Rare with technique
Quick Stats
Reading Time86 min
Related Topics

Animal Bites

Anterior Interosseous Nerve Anatomy

Blood Supply of the Forearm

Boutonniere Deformity