Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Distal Humerus Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Distal Humerus Fractures

Comprehensive guide to distal humerus fractures - AO/OTA classification, bicolumnar concept, surgical approaches, TEA indications, and decision-making for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

DISTAL HUMERUS FRACTURES - SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION

Bicolumnar Concept | Anatomic Reduction Essential | ORIF vs TEA

2-6%Of all fractures
30%Are intra-articular
BimodalYoung males, elderly females
90-95%Good outcomes with ORIF

AO/OTA CLASSIFICATION

Type A
PatternExtra-articular (supracondylar)
TreatmentPlate fixation
Type B
PatternPartial articular (unicondylar)
TreatmentScrew/plate fixation
Type C
PatternComplete articular (bicolumnar)
TreatmentDual plate fixation or TEA

Critical Must-Knows

  • Bicolumnar anatomy - triangular architecture must be reconstructed
  • Anatomic articular reduction is critical for good outcomes
  • Dual plate fixation (90-90 or parallel) is standard for Type C fractures
  • Olecranon osteotomy provides best articular visualization
  • Total elbow arthroplasty is an option in elderly, low-demand patients with comminution

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Columns form an inverted triangle - both must be stabilized
  • "
    Articular step more than 2mm increases arthritis risk significantly
  • "
    Ulnar nerve transposition is routine with medial plating
  • "
    TEA contraindicated in young active patients - reserved for elderly

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Pre/post-op X-rays showing dual plate fixation for distal humerus fracture
Click to expand
Pre/post-op X-rays showing dual plate fixation for distal humerus fractureCredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) - PMC (CC-BY)
6-panel cadaver specimens showing olecranon osteotomy cut techniques
Click to expand
6-panel cadaver specimens showing olecranon osteotomy cut techniquesCredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) - PMC (CC-BY)
4-panel showing failed radial head fixation converted to TEA
Click to expand
4-panel showing failed radial head fixation converted to TEACredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) - PMC (CC-BY)

Critical Distal Humerus Fracture Exam Points

Bicolumnar Concept

Distal humerus forms an inverted triangle with medial and lateral columns supporting the trochlea. Both columns must be stabilized to restore the triangular arch for stable elbow function.

Surgical Approaches

Olecranon osteotomy provides best visualization of articular surface. Alternatives: triceps-splitting, paratricipital (Bryan-Morrey), TRAP. Choice depends on fracture pattern and soft tissue.

Plate Configuration

90-90 plating (posterolateral and medial) or parallel plating (both posterior). Both biomechanically sound. 90-90 may reduce hardware conflict. Minimum 2 screws per column.

TEA Option

Total Elbow Arthroplasty indicated in elderly (age 65 plus), low-demand patients with significant comminution. Contraindicated in young, active patients. Lifetime lifting restriction 5kg.

Distal Humerus Fractures: Quick Reference

CategoryKey Points
2-6% of all fractures, 30% intra-articularBimodal: young males (high energy) and elderly females (low energy)
AO/OTA: Type A (extra-articular), Type B (partial articular), Type C (complete articular bicolumnar)C3 most challenging: comminuted articular and metaphyseal
Inverted triangular architecture with medial and lateral columnsBoth columns must be fixed to shaft for stability
Olecranon osteotomy: gold standard for articular visualizationAlternatives: triceps-splitting, paratricipital, TRAP
Dual plating: 90-90 (medial plus posterolateral) or parallel (both posterior)Minimum 2 screws per column into shaft, interdigitate distally
Age 65 plus, low demand, severe comminution (C3)Lifetime 5kg lifting restriction - contraindicated in young active patients
Stiffness (15-50%) most common - goal: 30-130 degrees functional arcUlnar neuropathy (10-15%), heterotopic ossification (5-15%), nonunion (2-10%)
ORIF: 90-95% good/excellent in young patientsTEA: similar outcomes to ORIF in elderly but with activity restrictions
Mnemonic

COLUMNS - Bicolumnar Fixation Principles

C
Capture articular block first
Reconstruct the trochlea
O
One screw per fragment minimum
Lag screws for articular pieces
L
Link columns to shaft
Plates bridge column to diaphysis
U
Ulnar nerve protection
Identify, protect, consider transposition
M
Medial and lateral plates
Dual plating for stability
N
No articular step-off
Anatomic reduction critical
S
Stiff fixation permits motion
Stable fixation enables early ROM

Memory Hook:COLUMNS reminds you to stabilize both columns for stable elbow reconstruction

Mnemonic

TRAP - Triceps-Reflecting Approach

T
Triceps elevated
Elevate triceps as continuous flap
R
Reflect with anconeus
Continuous extensor mechanism
A
Anconeus protects nerve
Maintains soft tissue coverage
P
Posterior structures preserved
Protects posterior capsule and stability

Memory Hook:TRAP approach reflects triceps with anconeus - continuous sleeve, avoids osteotomy

Mnemonic

13-ABCAO Distal Humerus Classification

A
Away from joint
Extra-articular (supracondylar)
B
Bit of joint involved
Partial articular (single column)
C
Complete articular
Bicolumnar separation

Memory Hook:13-ABC: A=Away, B=Bit, C=Complete - simple way to remember AO classification!

Mnemonic

TEA - Arthroplasty Indications

T
Ten years past 65
Elderly patient (age 75 plus ideal)
E
Extensive comminution
Cannot reconstruct articular surface
A
Activity level low
Sedentary, low-demand patient

Memory Hook:TEA for elderly patients, extensive damage, with low activity

Mnemonic

90-90 vs PARALLEL

90
90 degrees apart
Medial plate plus posterolateral plate
-
Versus
Alternative configuration
PAR
Parallel posterior
Both plates on posterior surface

Memory Hook:Both configurations work - 90-90 reduces hardware conflict, parallel may be stronger distally

Overview and Epidemiology

Distal humerus fractures are challenging injuries requiring meticulous surgical technique for optimal outcomes. They represent a significant proportion of elbow fractures and have complex anatomy requiring reconstruction.

Bimodal distribution:

  • Young males (20-40): High-energy trauma (MVA, falls from height, sports)
  • Elderly females (age 65 plus): Low-energy falls, osteoporotic bone

Mechanism of injury:

  • Fall directly onto elbow (most common)
  • Fall on outstretched hand with elbow flexed
  • High-energy direct trauma
  • Sports injuries (football, rugby)

Osteoporotic Considerations

In elderly patients with osteoporotic bone, achieving stable fixation is challenging. The "bag of bones" concept of conservative treatment has largely been replaced by ORIF or primary TEA for better functional outcomes.

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Bicolumnar anatomy:

The distal humerus forms an inverted triangle:

  • Medial column: Supports medial trochlear ridge
  • Lateral column: Supports capitellum and lateral trochlea
  • Apex: Confluence of columns at metaphysis
  • Base: Articular surface (trochlea plus capitellum)

Triangular Architecture

The medial and lateral columns form a triangular arch that supports the articular surface. Surgical reconstruction must restore this architecture. Both columns must be independently fixed to the shaft for stability.

Articular anatomy:

  • Trochlea: Articulates with ulna, spool-shaped
  • Capitellum: Articulates with radial head, hemispherical
  • Coronoid fossa: Accommodates coronoid in flexion
  • Olecranon fossa: Accommodates olecranon in extension
  • Thin central bone: Very thin bone between fossae

Normal angles:

  • Carrying angle: 10-15 degrees valgus (arm extended, palm forward)
  • Baumann angle: 70-80 degrees (angle of capitellum to humeral shaft)
  • Anterior humeral line: Passes through middle third of capitellum

Neurovascular considerations:

Ulnar Nerve

The ulnar nerve passes posterior to the medial epicondyle in the cubital tunnel. It is at risk during surgical exposure and with medial plate placement. Most surgeons perform anterior subcutaneous transposition as part of medial plating.

Other structures:

  • Radial nerve: Travels in spiral groove, passes anterior at lateral column level
  • Brachial artery: Anterior to joint, at risk with anterior approaches
  • Median nerve: Travels with brachial artery

Classification Systems

AO/OTA Classification (standard)

TypeDescriptionPattern
AExtra-articularSupracondylar
A1Apophyseal avulsionEpicondyle fracture
A2Simple metaphysealTransverse or oblique
A3Multifragmentary metaphysealComminuted supracondylar
BPartial articularUnicondylar
B1Lateral sagittalLateral condyle
B2Medial sagittalMedial condyle
B3Coronal (capitellar/trochlear)Shear fractures
CComplete articularBicolumnar
C1Simple articular, simple metaphysealT or Y pattern
C2Simple articular, comminuted metaphysealArticular simple, column comminution
C3Comminuted articular and metaphysealMost complex

C-Type Significance

Type C fractures are the most common pattern requiring surgical reconstruction. The articular block is separated from both columns, requiring reconstruction of the joint and stable fixation to the shaft.

Jupiter Classification (coronal shear fractures - Type B3)

TypeDescription
ICapitellum only
IICapitellum plus lateral trochlea (Hahn-Steinthal type)
IIICapitellum plus full trochlea
IVPlus posterior comminution

These coronal shear fractures require anterior approach for reduction and fixation. Key is to capture the articular fragment from anterior.

Milch Classification (lateral condyle fractures - historical)

TypeLateral trochlear ridge
IIntact - stable
IIFractured - unstable

Primarily used in pediatric lateral condyle fractures but concept applies to adult unicondylar patterns.

Riseborough and Radin Classification (supracondylar - historical)

TypeDescription
IUndisplaced
IIDisplaced, no rotation
IIIDisplaced with rotation
IVComminuted

Largely superseded by AO classification but may be referenced.

Three-dimensional heat maps of distal humerus fracture patterns by AO/OTA classification
Click to expand
3D fracture heat maps demonstrating fracture line distribution patterns according to AO/OTA classification. (a-e) Type A extra-articular fractures show transverse fracture lines concentrated in the trans-epicondylar region. (f-j) Type B partial articular fractures display fracture lines centred around the capitellum with vertical articular surface involvement. (k-o) Type C complete articular fractures demonstrate the highest fracture line density in the medial column with characteristic bicolumnar separation patterns. Red colour indicates higher fracture frequency, blue indicates lower frequency. The heat maps illustrate the relationship between fracture morphology and bone micro-architecture, with hot zones corresponding to areas of lower bone mineral density.Credit: Wang et al., Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism (fall, direct trauma, high vs low energy)
  • Age and activity level
  • Hand dominance
  • Pre-injury function and comorbidities
  • Occupation (implications for TEA consideration)

Physical examination:

Physical Examination Findings

FindingSignificanceAction
Gross swelling, deformityFracture confirmedSplint, ice, elevate
Skin compromise/tentingImpending open fractureUrgent reduction, consider early surgery
Open woundOpen fractureAntibiotics, debridement, staged treatment
Ulnar nerve dysfunctionNerve injury (15-20%)Document, monitor, consider early exploration
Absent pulseVascular injuryUrgent reduction, angiography
Compartment syndrome signsImpending compartment syndromeUrgent fasciotomies

Neurovascular examination:

  • Ulnar nerve: sensation little finger, FDI strength, Froment sign
  • Radial nerve: wrist/finger extension, sensation dorsal first web
  • Median nerve: sensation thumb/index, thenar strength
  • Brachial artery pulse, capillary refill

Ulnar Nerve Injury

Pre-operative ulnar nerve injury occurs in 15-20% of distal humerus fractures. Document carefully before surgery. Most are neurapraxia and recover. Persistent or worsening symptoms may require exploration.

Associated injuries:

  • Ipsilateral forearm fractures (floating elbow)
  • Olecranon fractures
  • Proximal ulna fractures

Investigations

Radiographic assessment:

Standard views:

  • AP elbow - Assess column involvement, carrying angle
  • Lateral elbow - Assess anterior/posterior displacement, articular involvement
  • Oblique views - May help delineate fracture pattern

Traction views:

  • AP and lateral with longitudinal traction
  • Reduces overlap, better defines fracture pattern
  • Useful for surgical planning

CT Imaging

CT with 3D reconstruction is essential for surgical planning in all Type C fractures. It defines articular involvement, identifies small fragments, and helps plan fixation strategy. Do not operate without adequate imaging.

CT indications:

  • All intra-articular fractures (Type B and C)
  • Surgical planning for ORIF
  • Coronal shear fractures (capitellar/trochlear)
  • Comminuted patterns
Three-dimensional preoperative planning and surgical simulation for distal humerus fracture fixation
Click to expand
3D preoperative planning workflow for distal humerus fracture osteosynthesis. (a) Virtual reduction and implant placement simulation showing segmented fracture fragments aligned with dual plating configuration. (b) Completed preoperative plan demonstrating plate positions and screw trajectories - note the interdigitating distal screws from medial and lateral plates. (c) Postoperative radiographs confirming execution of the surgical plan with anatomic reduction and stable dual plate fixation. This 3D planning approach allows surgeons to predict screw interference, optimise plate positioning, and achieve reproducible anatomic reduction.Credit: Yoshii et al., Tokyo Medical University

MRI:

  • Rarely indicated acutely
  • May be useful for soft tissue assessment in delayed presentations

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Distal humerus fracture treatment pathway
Click to expand
Alternative management pathway showing treatment decision tree based on fracture classification and patient age.Credit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Decision Guide

Fracture PatternPatient FactorsTreatment
Type A (extra-articular)Any agePosterior plating, no osteotomy needed
Type B (unicondylar)Any ageLag screws plus or minus buttress plate
Type C (bicolumnar)Young, active, good boneDual plate ORIF via olecranon osteotomy
Type C comminutedYoung patientDual plate ORIF - accept some complexity
Type C comminutedElderly (age 65 plus), low demandConsider primary TEA
Open fractureAny patientStaged: debridement, spanning ex-fix, then definitive

Conservative management:

Limited Role

Conservative management has a very limited role in displaced distal humerus fractures. Reserved for non-ambulatory patients, significant medical comorbidities precluding surgery, or truly non-displaced fractures.

If non-operative chosen:

  • Initial splinting at 90 degrees
  • Early gentle ROM if no surgery
  • Accept deformity and functional limitation
  • Often results in stiffness and malunion

Operative indications:

  • Virtually all displaced distal humerus fractures
  • Any articular involvement (Type B, C)
  • Open fractures
  • Associated vascular injury
  • Polytrauma with planned early mobilization

Most displaced distal humerus fractures benefit from surgical management to restore anatomy and enable early mobilization.

Timing of surgery:

  • Early surgery (24-48 hours) preferred to reduce swelling
  • Delay beyond 2-3 weeks increases difficulty significantly
  • Staged approach for open fractures or severe soft tissue injury

Timing

Operate within 24-48 hours if soft tissues permit. The elbow tolerates delay poorly - swelling, stiffness, and surgical difficulty all increase with time. Staged surgery with external fixation is appropriate for open or severely comminuted fractures.

Staged approach for:

  • Open fractures (Gustilo II, III)
  • Severe soft tissue injury
  • Contaminated wounds
  • Vascular injury requiring repair
  • Polytrauma requiring damage control

In staged management, temporary external fixation allows soft tissue recovery before definitive reconstruction.

Surgical Technique

Olecranon Osteotomy - gold standard for Type C fractures

Technique:

  • Posterior midline incision
  • Identify and protect ulnar nerve
  • Chevron or transverse osteotomy 2cm from tip
  • Predrill for later tension band or plate fixation
  • Reflect olecranon proximally with triceps attached
  • Provides excellent articular visualization

Alternative approaches:

Triceps-Splitting: Direct posterior split - adequate for Type A, limited articular view.

Bryan-Morrey (Paratricipital): Elevate triceps off columns - maintains continuity, limited articular view.

TRAP: Triceps-anconeus pedicle flap - maintains blood supply, avoids osteotomy.

Osteotomy Fixation

The osteotomy is typically fixed with tension band wire or plate fixation. Plate fixation may have lower hardware removal rates. Pre-drilling before osteotomy ensures accurate reduction.

Cadaveric specimens demonstrating olecranon osteotomy techniques
Click to expand
Six-panel (a-f) cadaveric ulna specimens demonstrating different olecranon osteotomy configurations for distal humerus fracture exposure. Black lines indicate osteotomy cut angles and patterns. (Top row, a-c) Three variations showing different apex-distal chevron angles. (Bottom row, d-f) Corresponding views demonstrating the opening achieved with each technique. The chevron osteotomy provides excellent articular visualization while maintaining triceps continuity for later repair with tension band or plate fixation.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0
Distal humerus fracture with dual plate fixation
Click to expand
Two-panel case demonstrating distal humerus fracture management (A, B). (A) Pre-operative AP and lateral X-rays showing comminuted intra-articular distal humerus fracture. (B) Post-operative X-rays showing anatomic reduction with dual plate fixation in parallel configuration - the standard bicolumnar fixation technique providing stable fixation for early mobilization.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Plate Configuration Options:

Plate Configuration Options

ConfigurationPlate PositionsAdvantages
90-90 platingMedial plus posterolateralLess hardware conflict, easier technically
Parallel platingBoth posterior surfaceMay be stronger distally, more screws into articular block
Medial onlyMedial plate aloneRarely adequate - reserved for simple patterns

Key fixation principles:

  1. Reconstruct articular surface first with lag screws
  2. Fix articular block to columns with plates
  3. Fix columns to shaft with adequate screw purchase
  4. Minimum 2 screws per column into the shaft
  5. Interdigitate distal screws in articular block

Screw Interdigitation

Interdigitating screws from medial and lateral plates into the articular block creates a fixed-angle construct, improving stability. This is particularly important in osteoporotic bone where single-column fixation may fail.

Total Elbow Arthroplasty:

Indications:

  • Age 65 plus (ideally age 75 plus)
  • Low-demand patient
  • Severe articular comminution (C3 pattern)
  • Pre-existing arthritis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis

Contraindications:

  • Young, active patient
  • High-demand occupation
  • Good bone stock amenable to ORIF

TEA Restrictions

Total elbow arthroplasty requires lifetime lifting restriction of approximately 5kg. Not appropriate for young or active patients. Revision rates are higher than hip/knee arthroplasty.

Complications

Complications of Distal Humerus Fracture Treatment

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Elbow stiffness15-50%Early motion, stable fixation, CPM
Ulnar neuropathy10-15%Anterior transposition, careful handling
Heterotopic ossification5-15%Prophylaxis (indomethacin or XRT), early motion
Nonunion2-10%Stable fixation, bone graft if needed
Hardware failure3-5%Adequate fixation, protected loading
Infection1-3%Prophylactic antibiotics, good soft tissue handling
Osteotomy nonunion5-10%Adequate fixation, consider plate over TBW
Post-traumatic arthritis10-20%Anatomic reduction, minimize step-off

Stiffness:

  • Most common complication
  • Goal: functional arc 30-130 degrees
  • Prevention: stable fixation allowing early motion
  • Treatment: physiotherapy, dynamic splinting, arthroscopic or open release

Functional Arc

The functional arc for most activities of daily living is 30-130 degrees flexion and 50 degrees pronation-supination. This is the minimum acceptable outcome. Patients should be counseled that some stiffness is expected.

Ulnar nerve complications:

  • Transposition is routine with medial plating
  • New symptoms may develop post-operatively
  • Most neurapraxias recover over 6-12 months
  • Persistent symptoms may require revision transposition

Heterotopic ossification:

  • More common with delayed surgery, head injury, severe trauma
  • Prophylaxis: indomethacin 75mg/day for 2 weeks or single-dose XRT
  • May require excision if limiting motion (wait 12 plus months)

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-ORIF protocol:

Day 0-3
  • Posterior splint at 90 degrees
  • Elevation, ice
  • Wound check at 48 hours
  • Gentle finger motion
Week 1-2
  • Remove splint for supervised motion
  • Begin active assisted ROM
  • Focus on flexion-extension first
  • Continue finger and wrist motion
Week 2-6
  • Progressive active ROM
  • Night splinting if developing flexion contracture
  • Dynamic splinting if significant stiffness
  • No resistive exercises
Week 6-12
  • Begin gentle strengthening
  • Progressive loading as tolerated
  • Continue ROM exercises
3-6 months
  • Full strengthening
  • Return to most activities
  • Heavy lifting/sport when healed

Key rehabilitation principles:

  • Stable fixation is essential for early motion
  • Continuous passive motion (CPM) may be helpful
  • Balance between motion and healing
  • Patient education about expected stiffness
  • Long-term therapy often required

Motion Priority

The goal is early motion to prevent stiffness. Stable fixation that allows early ROM produces better outcomes than rigid immobilization. If fixation is not stable enough for motion, it is not adequate.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Expected outcomes by treatment:

TreatmentGood/Excellent OutcomesKey Points
ORIF (young)90-95%Anatomic reduction, early motion
ORIF (elderly)75-85%More stiffness, higher complication rate
TEA85-90%Reliable pain relief, restrictions required
Conservative50-60%Stiffness, malunion, poor function

Prognostic factors:

  • Patient age and bone quality
  • Fracture complexity (C3 worse than C1)
  • Quality of reduction (articular step-off)
  • Adequacy of fixation
  • Associated injuries
  • Compliance with rehabilitation

ORIF vs TEA Outcomes

In comparable elderly populations, ORIF and TEA produce similar functional outcomes at 2 years. ORIF has higher re-operation rates for hardware issues. TEA has lifetime restrictions but reliable pain relief. Patient selection is key.

Evidence Base

Level I
📚 McKee et al. - ORIF vs TEA in Elderly
Key Findings:
  • RCT comparing ORIF to TEA in patients age 65 plus with AO Type C fractures
  • TEA had better MEPS scores at 2 years (86 vs 73)
  • TEA group had fewer re-operations compared to ORIF group
  • Both groups achieved similar functional outcomes overall
Clinical Implication: TEA is a reasonable option for elderly low-demand patients with comminuted fractures. Should be part of shared decision-making.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009

Level III
📚 O'Driscoll - Parallel vs Perpendicular Plating
Key Findings:
  • Biomechanical study showing parallel plating (both plates posterior) may provide stronger fixation than 90-90 configuration
  • Screws interdigitating in articular block create fixed-angle construct
  • Both configurations demonstrated adequate biomechanical stability
  • Key factor is adequate screw purchase in articular block
Clinical Implication: Both configurations are acceptable. Key is adequate screw purchase and interdigitation in articular block.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005

Level IV
📚 Sanchez-Sotelo - Olecranon Osteotomy
Key Findings:
  • Chevron osteotomy provides excellent articular visualization
  • Nonunion rate 5-10% with tension band wiring
  • Plate fixation may reduce hardware-related complications compared to tension band wiring
  • Pre-drilling before osteotomy improves reduction accuracy
Clinical Implication: Olecranon osteotomy remains gold standard for articular visualization. Consider plate fixation over TBW.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007

Level IV
📚 Athwal - Coronal Shear Fractures
Key Findings:
  • Coronal shear fractures (capitellar/trochlear) require anterior approach
  • Headless compression screws from anterior provide stable fixation
  • Countersunk screws avoid articular prominence
  • Important to recognize as distinct fracture pattern
Clinical Implication: Recognize coronal shear as distinct pattern requiring anterior approach. Headless screws or countersunk screws preferred.
Source: J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011

Level III
📚 Schemitsch - Outcomes Review
Key Findings:
  • Modern ORIF techniques produce 85-95% good/excellent outcomes in Type C fractures
  • Key factors: anatomic reduction, stable fixation, early motion
  • Quality of articular reduction is most critical determinant
  • Early motion protocol improves functional outcomes
Clinical Implication: ORIF remains gold standard for most distal humerus fractures. Technique and fixation quality are critical determinants of outcome.
Source: J Orthop Trauma 2013

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Bicolumnar Fracture Management

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old right-hand dominant carpenter falls from a ladder, landing on his elbow. X-rays show a Type C2 distal humerus fracture (simple articular, comminuted metaphysis). The ulnar nerve is intact. Describe your management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Thank you. This 45-year-old carpenter has an AO Type C2 distal humerus fracture - this is a bicolumnar intra-articular fracture with a simple articular split but comminuted metaphysis. Given his age, occupation, and the fracture pattern, ORIF is clearly indicated.

Initial Management: I would splint the elbow at 90 degrees, provide adequate analgesia, and document complete neurovascular status including the ulnar nerve. I would order a CT scan with 3D reconstruction for surgical planning to better define the articular and metaphyseal components.

Timing: I would aim for surgery within 24-48 hours before swelling peaks. Operating on a swollen elbow significantly increases complication risk.

Surgical Approach: Through a posterior skin incision, I would perform a chevron olecranon osteotomy - this provides the best visualization of the distal humeral articular surface. The ulnar nerve must be identified early and protected - I would perform anterior subcutaneous transposition to protect it from the medial plate.

Fixation Strategy:

  • First, reconstruct the articular block using small lag screws to convert C2 to a supracondylar pattern
  • Then apply dual plating - my preference is 90-90 configuration (medial plate plus posterolateral plate)
  • Minimum greater than 2 screws per plate into the shaft, with interdigitating screws in the articular block
  • Fix the olecranon osteotomy with a plate or tension band construct

Postoperatively: Early motion is essential - once the wound is stable at 7-10 days, begin active assisted ROM. The carpenter can expect return to work at 3-4 months.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Initial: splint, ice, elevation, analgesia, document neurovascular status
Imaging: CT with 3D reconstruction for surgical planning
Timing: surgery within 24-48 hours before swelling peaks
Approach: posterior incision, chevron olecranon osteotomy for articular visualization
Identify and protect ulnar nerve - plan anterior transposition
Fixation: reconstruct articular block with lag screws, then dual plating
Plate configuration: 90-90 (medial plus posterolateral) or parallel
Minimum 2 screws per column into shaft, interdigitate in articular block
Fix olecranon with plate or tension band
Postop: early motion when wound allows
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not getting CT scan for surgical planning
✗Choosing approach with inadequate articular visualization
✗Forgetting ulnar nerve transposition
✗Inadequate fixation (single plate, insufficient screws)
✗Recommending conservative treatment for this patient
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If the articular surface was comminuted (C3), how would this change your approach?"
"Would you consider TEA?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Elderly Patient with Comminuted Fracture

EXAMINER

"A 78-year-old woman with osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis falls at home. CT shows a Type C3 distal humerus fracture with severe articular comminution. She lives alone but is independent. What are your treatment options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Thank you. This is a challenging case requiring careful consideration of patient factors and fracture characteristics to determine optimal management.

Assessment of Key Factors:

  • Age 78 - life expectancy considerations
  • Osteoporosis - poor bone quality for fixation
  • Rheumatoid arthritis - pre-existing joint disease and ligamentous laxity
  • Type C3 - severe articular comminution making anatomic reconstruction difficult
  • Independent living - but activity demands need clarification

Options: The two main options are ORIF versus primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA).

Arguments Against ORIF:

  • Osteoporotic bone with poor screw purchase
  • Articular surface likely unreconstructable
  • High risk of fixation failure and nonunion
  • May end up requiring delayed TEA anyway (worse outcomes than primary TEA)

Arguments For Primary TEA:

  • Predictable pain relief (greater than 95% satisfaction)
  • No need to reconstruct comminuted articular surface
  • Early mobilization
  • Well-established outcomes in RA patients

TEA Considerations:

  • Lifetime 5kg lifting restriction - must counsel carefully
  • Would use a linked implant given RA and likely ligamentous insufficiency
  • Approach via posterior incision, paratricipital or triceps-reflecting approach

My Recommendation: Given the constellation of factors - age, osteoporosis, RA, and unreconstructable C3 pattern - I would recommend primary TEA after thorough counseling about activity restrictions. However, the final decision must involve the patient's informed choice regarding lifestyle implications.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
This patient has multiple factors favoring TEA: age, osteoporosis, RA, comminuted C3 pattern
However, she is independent - consider activity demands carefully
Options: ORIF vs primary TEA
ORIF challenges: poor bone quality, articular comminution, fixation likely to fail
TEA advantages: reliable pain relief, predictable outcome
TEA disadvantages: lifetime 5kg lifting restriction, revision surgery if needed
Discuss with patient: ORIF may not be reconstructable, TEA restrictions
Approach for TEA: posterior, paratricipital or TRAP
Linked or unlinked implant depending on bone/ligament quality
Post-op: early motion, long-term activity restrictions
COMMON TRAPS
✗Automatically choosing TEA without considering patient wishes
✗Attempting ORIF in unreconstructable fracture
✗Not counseling about TEA restrictions
✗Forgetting that RA may affect ligamentous stability (linked implant preferred)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the long-term complications of TEA?"
"What is the expected revision rate?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Open Fracture with Soft Tissue Compromise

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old male motorcyclist has a Type C3 distal humerus fracture with severe soft tissue injury and skin loss posteriorly. The wound is contaminated. The hand is well perfused but he has ulnar nerve palsy. How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Thank you. This is a complex open fracture requiring a staged approach. The priorities are soft tissue management first, then definitive fracture fixation.

Immediate Management:

  • ATLS assessment - ensure no life-threatening injuries
  • IV antibiotics - cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside for Gustilo III pattern
  • Tetanus prophylaxis
  • Thorough documentation of the ulnar nerve palsy - this is likely a primary injury at the time of trauma
  • Provisional splinting

Operative Stage 1 (within 6-12 hours):

  • Thorough irrigation and debridement of all contaminated and devitalized tissue
  • Explore the ulnar nerve - in an open fracture with palsy, the nerve must be visualized
  • Apply a spanning external fixator to stabilize the fracture and protect the soft tissues
  • Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for soft tissue management
  • Early plastic surgery consultation for soft tissue coverage planning

Staged Approach:

  • Serial debridements every 48-72 hours until wound is clean
  • Definitive soft tissue coverage required before or concurrent with ORIF - typically flap coverage
  • ORIF when soft tissues are stable, usually 7-14 days - dual plating through healthy tissue

Critical Points:

  • TEA is absolutely contraindicated in this 35-year-old active patient
  • The ulnar nerve should be protected and monitored - may need delayed grafting if transected
  • Free tissue transfer may be required if local flaps insufficient

Expected Outcome: With staged management, we can achieve fracture union and functional outcome. The ulnar nerve palsy will be monitored with EMG/NCS at 6 weeks.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
This is an open fracture with soft tissue compromise - life before limb
Initial management: antibiotics, tetanus, irrigation and debridement
Document ulnar nerve palsy carefully - likely pre-existing from injury
Staged approach required due to soft tissue injury
First stage: thorough debridement, spanning external fixator, wound management
Negative pressure wound therapy for soft tissue management
May need plastic surgery consultation for soft tissue coverage
Definitive fixation delayed until soft tissue stable (7-14 days typically)
When soft tissues allow: ORIF through recovered tissue
TEA contraindicated in young active patient
Ulnar nerve: explore at debridement, protect, monitor recovery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting primary ORIF in compromised soft tissues
✗Considering TEA in a young active patient
✗Not exploring ulnar nerve in open fracture with palsy
✗Inadequate debridement or soft tissue management
✗Delaying soft tissue coverage
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"If soft tissue coverage is not achievable with local flaps, what are your options?"
"When would you consider free flap coverage?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy Question

Q: What is the bicolumnar concept in distal humerus fractures? A: The distal humerus forms an inverted triangular architecture with medial and lateral columns that support the articular surface (trochlea and capitellum). Both columns must be reconstructed and fixed to the shaft for stable elbow function.

Approach Question

Q: Which surgical approach provides the best visualization of the distal humerus articular surface? A: Chevron olecranon osteotomy. This elevates the olecranon with the triceps attached, providing direct visualization of the entire articular surface. Alternative approaches (triceps-splitting, paratricipital) have limited articular visualization.

Fixation Question

Q: In 90-90 plating of the distal humerus, where are the plates positioned? A: Medial plate on the medial column and posterolateral plate on the lateral column, positioned approximately 90 degrees apart. Alternative is parallel plating with both plates on the posterior surface.

TEA Question

Q: What are the indications for primary TEA in distal humerus fractures? A: Age 65 plus years, low-demand patient, severe articular comminution (C3 pattern) that cannot be reconstructed, and pre-existing arthritis (especially rheumatoid). Contraindicated in young, active patients.

Complication Question

Q: What is the most common complication following distal humerus fracture fixation? A: Elbow stiffness (15-50%). The goal is to achieve a functional arc of 30-130 degrees. Prevention includes stable fixation allowing early motion and appropriate physiotherapy.

Australian Context

Epidemiology:

  • Bimodal distribution similar to worldwide data
  • Increasing elderly population equals more low-energy fractures
  • Sports injuries (AFL, rugby, cycling) in younger population

Management considerations:

  • Subspecialty referral often required for complex patterns
  • May require transfer to major trauma center

TEA considerations in Australia:

  • Limited centers performing high volumes
  • Implant availability may vary
  • Revision surgery capacity important consideration
  • National Joint Replacement Registry tracks outcomes

Exam Context

Be prepared to discuss both ORIF and TEA options with their indications, advantages, and disadvantages. Understand the Australian healthcare context including public/private systems and regional variation in expertise.

DISTAL HUMERUS FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

BICOLUMNAR CONCEPT

  • •Inverted triangular architecture
  • •Medial column plus lateral column support articular surface
  • •Both columns must be fixed to shaft for stability
  • •Interdigitating screws in articular block

CLASSIFICATION

  • •AO Type A: extra-articular (supracondylar)
  • •AO Type B: partial articular (unicondylar)
  • •AO Type C: complete articular (bicolumnar)
  • •C3 equals comminuted articular and metaphyseal equals most challenging

SURGICAL APPROACHES

  • •Olecranon osteotomy: best articular visualization (gold standard)
  • •Triceps-splitting: simple patterns, limited view
  • •Paratricipital: TEA, some ORIF, no osteotomy
  • •TRAP: TEA, preserves triceps blood supply

PLATE CONFIGURATION

  • •90-90: medial plus posterolateral plates (90 degrees apart)
  • •Parallel: both plates posterior surface
  • •Both configurations acceptable
  • •Minimum 2 screws per column into shaft

TEA INDICATIONS

  • •Age 65 plus (ideally age 75 plus)
  • •Low-demand patient
  • •Severe articular comminution (C3)
  • •Pre-existing arthritis (especially RA)
  • •Contraindicated in young, active patients

TRAPS AND PEARLS

  • •Always get CT for surgical planning
  • •Ulnar nerve transposition is routine with medial plating
  • •Early motion is essential to prevent stiffness
  • •Functional arc: 30-130 degrees flexion
  • •TEA requires lifetime 5kg lifting restriction
Quick Stats
Reading Time106 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures