Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Fatigue Failure in Biomaterials

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Fatigue Failure in Biomaterials

Mechanisms of cyclic loading failure, S-N curves, and endurance limits in orthopaedic implants

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

FATIGUE FAILURE IN BIOMATERIALS

Cyclic Loading | S-N Curves | Crack Propagation | Endurance Limit

10^6cycles - typical endurance limit definition
3-10xfatigue strength vs ultimate tensile strength reduction
10^7walking cycles per year
30%UTS for fatigue limit in steel

Three Stages of Fatigue Failure

Stage I: Crack Initiation
PatternMicrostructural damage accumulation
TreatmentSurface or notch
Stage II: Crack Propagation
PatternStable crack growth per cycle
TreatmentParis law region
Stage III: Final Fracture
PatternUnstable rapid failure
TreatmentCritical crack length reached

Critical Must-Knows

  • Fatigue failure occurs at stresses well below ultimate tensile strength due to cyclic loading
  • S-N curve plots stress amplitude vs cycles to failure - fundamental fatigue characterization
  • Endurance limit: stress below which infinite cycles can be sustained (ferrous metals)
  • Paris law: da/dN = C(ΔK)^m describes stable crack propagation
  • Implant design must consider 10^7-10^8 cycles for 10-20 year lifespan

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Hip replacement sees 1-2 million cycles per year of walking
  • "
    Notches and surface defects are stress concentration sites for crack initiation
  • "
    Titanium has no true endurance limit (fatigue limit at 10^7 cycles)
  • "
    Corrosion accelerates fatigue (fretting, crevice corrosion)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Critical Fatigue Failure Exam Points

Cyclic Loading Failure

Failure under repeated loads below yield strength. Single load may be safe but 10^6 cycles cause accumulating damage. Explains plate/screw fractures, stem fractures in THA.

S-N Curve Interpretation

Stress (S) vs Number of cycles (N) to failure. High stress = few cycles. Low stress = many cycles. Horizontal asymptote = endurance limit (if it exists for that material).

Design for Millions of Cycles

Implants must survive 10^7-10^8 cycles for 10-20 year lifespan. Walking generates 1-2 million cycles/year. Design stress must be well below fatigue limit.

Crack Propagation

Paris law: da/dN = C(ΔK)^m. Crack growth rate per cycle depends on stress intensity range. Small cracks grow slowly, then accelerate to final fracture when critical size reached.

At a Glance

Fatigue failure occurs when materials fail under cyclic loading at stresses well below their ultimate tensile strength, explaining plate/screw fractures and implant failures in orthopaedics. The process involves three stages: crack initiation (at stress concentration sites like notches), stable crack propagation (described by Paris law: da/dN = C(ΔK)^m), and final fracture (when critical crack length is reached). The S-N curve characterizes fatigue behavior by plotting stress amplitude vs cycles to failure; ferrous metals exhibit an endurance limit below which infinite cycles can be sustained (titanium does not). Hip replacements experience 10^7 cycles per year of walking, requiring implant design stresses well below the fatigue limit. Corrosion accelerates fatigue through fretting and crevice mechanisms.

Mnemonic

SCRAMSFactors Affecting Fatigue Life

S
Stress amplitude
Higher stress = fewer cycles to failure
C
Corrosion
Accelerates crack initiation and propagation
R
Roughness (surface)
Smooth finish increases fatigue life
A
Alloy composition
Microstructure affects crack resistance
M
Mean stress
Higher mean stress reduces cycles to failure
S
Stress concentrations
Notches, holes, scratches initiate cracks

Memory Hook:Fatigue SCRAMS your implant over time!

Mnemonic

IPFThree Stages of Fatigue Failure

I
Initiation
Crack nucleates at defect, notch, or surface (10-90% of life)
P
Propagation
Stable crack growth - Paris law region (beach marks visible)
F
Final fracture
Rapid unstable failure when crack reaches critical size

Memory Hook:IPF - Initiation, Propagation, Final failure stages of fatigue!

Overview and Mechanisms

Fatigue failure is the progressive structural damage that occurs when a material is subjected to repeated cyclic loading at stresses below its ultimate tensile strength. This phenomenon is responsible for the majority of mechanical failures in orthopaedic implants including plate fractures, screw breakage, and prosthesis stem fractures.

The fatigue process involves three stages: crack initiation at stress concentrations, stable crack propagation governed by Paris law, and final catastrophic fracture when the crack reaches critical size. Understanding fatigue is essential for implant design, as devices must survive millions of loading cycles over decades.

Why Fatigue Failure Matters Clinically

Fatigue explains clinical failures including: plate fractures in delayed/non-unions (ongoing cyclical loading), screw breakage in spinal instrumentation, modular taper fractures in hip stems, tibial baseplate failures in TKA. Prevention requires proper implant design, stress shielding avoidance, and early bone healing before fatigue damage accumulates.

Fatigue vs Static Failure

Static: Single load exceeds material strength

  • Predictable by ultimate tensile strength
  • Ductile: yields before fracture
  • Brittle: sudden fracture

Fatigue: Cyclic loads accumulate damage

  • Occurs below yield strength
  • Progressive crack growth
  • Sudden final fracture (appears brittle)

Clinical Loading Scenarios

  • Walking: 2 million cycles/year
  • Hip stem: 2-5 MPa cyclic stress
  • Plate in nonunion: Repeated bending 100,000s cycles
  • Screw: Cyclic shear and tension
  • Implant lifespan goal: 10-20 years = 20-40M cycles

Imaging and Analysis

Imaging and Analysis

Principles of S-N Curves and Endurance Limit

S-N Curve Fundamentals

The S-N curve (Wöhler curve) is the fundamental relationship between cyclic stress amplitude (S) and number of cycles to failure (N). It is generated by testing specimens at various stress levels and recording cycles to failure.

Material TypeEndurance LimitFatigue Strength at 10^6 cyclesClinical Example
Stainless Steel 316LYes (~200 MPa)~40% UTSPlates, screws
Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4VNo true limit~60% UTS at 10^7Stems, cages
Cobalt-ChromeNo true limit~40-50% UTS at 10^7Femoral heads, stems
PMMA cementNoLow fatigue resistanceCement mantle

Key Features:

  • High cycle fatigue: Low stress, many cycles (greater than 10^5)
  • Low cycle fatigue: High stress, fewer cycles (less than 10^5)
  • Endurance limit: Stress below which infinite cycles possible (ferrous metals only)
  • Fatigue limit: Practical limit at 10^6 or 10^7 cycles

Ferrous vs Non-Ferrous:

  • Ferrous metals (steel): True horizontal asymptote = endurance limit
  • Non-ferrous metals (titanium, aluminum): S-N curve continues to decline
  • For Ti alloys, "fatigue limit" defined at 10^7 cycles (~60% UTS)

Design Implications

Titanium has no true endurance limit - S-N curve continues downward even beyond 10^7 cycles. For long-term implants (20+ years), design stress must account for 10^8+ cycles. Factor of safety of 2-3 typically applied to fatigue limit.

Stress Parameters

Fatigue life depends not just on stress amplitude but also mean stress and stress ratio.

Definitions:

  • Stress amplitude (σ_a) = (σ_max - σ_min) / 2
  • Mean stress (σ_m) = (σ_max + σ_min) / 2
  • Stress ratio (R) = σ_min / σ_max

Goodman Relationship: Higher mean stress reduces fatigue life. Goodman diagram plots allowable stress amplitude vs mean stress, with safe region below the line.

Crack Propagation and Paris Law

Paris Law

The rate of crack growth per cycle (da/dN) in the stable propagation region (Stage II) follows Paris law:

da/dN = C (ΔK)^m

Where:

  • da/dN = crack growth rate (meters per cycle)
  • ΔK = stress intensity factor range = K_max - K_min
  • C, m = material constants (m typically 2-4)

Stress Intensity Factor (K): K = Y × σ × sqrt(π × a)

  • Y = geometry factor
  • σ = applied stress
  • a = crack length

As crack grows, K increases (since a increases), so crack growth rate accelerates until critical K_IC (fracture toughness) is reached and final fracture occurs.

Implications:

  • Small cracks grow very slowly (low ΔK)
  • Crack growth is exponential (m power relationship)
  • Lifespan depends heavily on initial defect size
  • Inspection can detect cracks before critical size

Factors Affecting Crack Propagation

FactorEffect on PropagationMechanismPrevention Strategy
Corrosive environmentAccelerates growthCorrosion fatigue, stress corrosion crackingPassivation, coatings
Surface roughnessFaster initiationStress risers at surfacePolishing, shot peening
Residual tensionAcceleratesAdds to applied stressCompressive residual stress
Grain boundariesCan slow or accelerateDepends on orientationOptimize microstructure

Clinical Relevance

Implant Fatigue Failures

Common Scenarios:

  • Plate fracture: Delayed union or nonunion - plate bears cyclic bending for months
  • Screw breakage: Stress concentration at threads, especially if overtightened
  • Hip stem fracture: Rare with modern designs, seen with undersized stems
  • Tibial baseplate: Unsupported overhang creates cantilever bending
  • Modular junction: Taper fractures from fretting and corrosion

Prevention Strategies:

  • Proper implant sizing (avoid undersizing)
  • Minimize stress concentrations (avoid sharp corners, notches)
  • Surface treatments (polishing, passivation)
  • Achieve early bony union (reduce loading cycles on implant)
  • Follow manufacturer guidelines (don't modify implants)

Corrosion-Fatigue Interaction

Corrosion dramatically reduces fatigue life through:

  • Fretting corrosion: Micro-motion creates wear particles and crevices
  • Crevice corrosion: Oxygen depletion in gaps accelerates oxidation
  • Pitting corrosion: Creates stress concentration sites for crack initiation
  • Stress corrosion cracking: Tensile stress + corrosive environment

Clinical Example: Modular taper junctions in THA subject to fretting corrosion. Micro-motion between head and stem creates debris, crevice environment, and potential for catastrophic taper fracture. Proper assembly (clean, dry, impaction) critical.

Evidence Base

Fatigue Properties of Titanium Alloy Implants

3
Niinomi M • Mater Sci Eng C (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Ti-6Al-4V fatigue strength approximately 550-600 MPa at 10^7 cycles
  • No true endurance limit - S-N curve continues to decline beyond 10^7
  • Surface treatments (shot peening, polishing) increase fatigue life 20-30%
  • Notch sensitivity high - stress concentrations dramatically reduce life
Clinical Implication: Titanium implant design must account for 10^8+ cycles with appropriate safety factor (2-3x) below fatigue limit.
Limitation: Laboratory testing may not fully replicate in vivo corrosive environment.

Plate Fracture in Delayed Union

3
Perren SM • Injury (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Plate fractures occur almost exclusively in delayed or nonunion cases
  • Cyclic loading accumulates fatigue damage when bone doesn't heal
  • Fracture typically occurs at screw holes (stress concentration)
  • Time to plate fracture: typically 6-12 months of nonunion
Clinical Implication: Plate fracture is sign of biological failure (nonunion), not implant failure. Treatment requires addressing healing, not just implant exchange.
Limitation: Exact fatigue life depends on patient activity level and implant loading.

Corrosion-Fatigue Interaction in Modular Hip Prostheses

3
Gilbert JL et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Fretting corrosion at modular tapers accelerates fatigue crack initiation
  • Mechanically-assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) is key mechanism
  • Mixed metal couples (CoCr/Ti) at greater risk than matched materials
  • Proper assembly technique (clean, dry, single impaction) reduces risk
Clinical Implication: Modular taper assembly technique is critical to reduce fretting corrosion and associated fatigue crack initiation. Clean, dry surfaces with single impaction recommended.
Limitation: In vitro and retrieval studies - cannot definitively predict in vivo failure patterns.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: S-N Curve and Endurance Limit

EXAMINER

"Examiner shows S-N curve and asks: Explain what this curve represents and the concept of endurance limit."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an S-N curve, which plots the stress amplitude (S) versus the number of cycles to failure (N) for a material under cyclic loading. It is the fundamental characterization of fatigue behavior. The curve shows that at high stress amplitudes, the material fails after relatively few cycles - this is low cycle fatigue. As stress amplitude decreases, the number of cycles to failure increases exponentially. For ferrous metals like stainless steel, the curve eventually becomes horizontal at a stress level called the endurance limit, typically around 30-40% of ultimate tensile strength. Below this endurance limit, the material can theoretically sustain infinite cycles without failure. For non-ferrous metals like titanium alloys used in orthopaedic implants, there is no true endurance limit - the S-N curve continues to decline even beyond 10^7 cycles. Therefore, for titanium implants we define a fatigue limit at 10^7 cycles, which is approximately 60% of ultimate tensile strength. For implant design, we must consider that walking generates about 2 million cycles per year, so a 20-year implant must survive 40 million cycles. Design stresses must be well below the fatigue limit with safety factors of 2-3 to ensure longevity.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
S-N curve: stress amplitude vs cycles to failure
High stress = few cycles (low cycle fatigue)
Endurance limit: stress below which infinite cycles possible (ferrous metals)
Titanium has no true endurance limit - fatigue limit at 10^7 cycles
Implant design: 2M cycles/year × 20 years = 40M cycles required
COMMON TRAPS
✗Saying all materials have an endurance limit (titanium doesn't)
✗Not relating to clinical loading (walking cycles)
✗Missing the safety factor requirement for design
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What factors affect fatigue life?"
"What is Paris law?"
"Why do plates fracture in nonunions?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Plate Fracture in Delayed Union

EXAMINER

"A patient with tibial shaft fracture has plate fixation. At 9 months, the fracture has not healed and you notice a crack in the plate on radiographs. Explain the fatigue failure mechanism and management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This represents fatigue failure of the plate due to delayed union. The mechanism is as follows: when the fracture doesn't heal, the plate continues to bear cyclic bending loads with each step. These loads are below the plate's ultimate strength so a single load would not cause failure, but repeated cycling accumulates microscopic damage through fatigue. Fatigue failure has three stages: first, crack initiation at a stress concentration point, typically at a screw hole where stress is concentrated. Second, stable crack propagation where the crack grows slowly with each loading cycle according to Paris law - the growth rate depends on the stress intensity factor range. Third, final rapid fracture when the crack reaches critical size. In this case, at 9 months the patient has likely subjected the plate to over 1 million walking cycles, sufficient to propagate a crack to visible size. The crack on X-ray indicates we are in late Stage II propagation, approaching catastrophic Stage III failure. Management requires addressing the biological problem, not just the implant. The fracture nonunion is the underlying issue. I would first assess why the fracture hasn't healed - possible infection, inadequate stability, impaired biology. Treatment options include exchange nailing with bone grafting, dynamization if appropriate, or revising to a different fixation method. Simply replacing the plate without addressing the nonunion will result in fracture of the new plate as well.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Fatigue failure from cyclic loading below ultimate strength
Three stages: initiation (screw hole), propagation (Paris law), final fracture
Over 1 million cycles in 9 months of walking
Crack visible on X-ray = late stage propagation
Treat nonunion, not just plate (biological failure)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Suggesting plate was defective or too weak
✗Not explaining the three stages of fatigue
✗Planning to just exchange the plate without addressing nonunion
✗Missing the cyclic loading mechanism (over 1M cycles)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you investigate the cause of nonunion?"
"What if there is infection?"
"Would a stronger plate prevent this?"

MCQ Practice Points

S-N Curve Question

Q: What does the S-N curve represent in fatigue testing? A: Stress amplitude (S) versus number of cycles to failure (N). Fundamental relationship showing that higher stress leads to fewer cycles before fatigue failure.

Endurance Limit Question

Q: Do titanium alloys have a true endurance limit? A: No - Unlike ferrous metals, titanium alloys have no true endurance limit. The S-N curve continues to decline beyond 10^7 cycles. A fatigue limit is defined at 10^7 cycles (~60% UTS) for design purposes.

Paris Law Question

Q: What does Paris law describe? A: Crack growth rate per cycle in Stage II fatigue: da/dN = C(ΔK)^m, where ΔK is stress intensity factor range. Describes stable crack propagation before final fracture.

Plate Fracture Question

Q: Why do plates fracture in delayed unions but not in normally healing fractures? A: Cyclic loading accumulates fatigue damage when bone doesn't heal. Normal healing occurs in 3-6 months (less than 1 million cycles), insufficient for fatigue failure. Delayed union subjects plate to millions of cycles, causing fatigue crack initiation and propagation.

Design Cycles Question

Q: How many loading cycles must a hip replacement survive for 20-year lifespan? A: 40 million cycles - Walking generates approximately 2 million cycles per year. Design must account for 20 years × 2M cycles/year = 40M cycles with safety factor.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology and Practice

Fatigue Failure in Australian Orthopaedic Practice:

  • Implant fatigue is an important consideration given Australia's active population and high arthroplasty rates
  • The AOANJRR tracks implant failures including those attributable to fatigue mechanisms
  • Understanding fatigue principles is fundamental FRACS Basic Science examination content

RACS Orthopaedic Training Relevance:

  • S-N curves, endurance limits, and Paris law are core biomechanics concepts examined in the FRACS Part I
  • Understanding why plates fracture in delayed unions demonstrates integration of basic science and clinical knowledge
  • Material selection (titanium vs stainless steel vs CoCr) and fatigue properties frequently examined

Clinical Practice in Australia:

  • High activity levels in Australian patients increase implant loading cycles
  • Prevention of fatigue failure requires achieving early bony union to reduce implant loading
  • AOANJRR data on implant revision provides indirect evidence of fatigue-related failures

PBS Considerations:

  • Bone stimulators for delayed union may be PBS-subsidised in specific circumstances
  • Medications for bone healing support (calcium, vitamin D) available through PBS

eTG Recommendations:

  • Management of delayed and nonunion follows established principles to reduce implant fatigue loading
  • Early intervention for nonunion prevents progression to implant fatigue failure

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Fatigue Failure
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Fatigue FailureCredit: OrthoVellum

FATIGUE FAILURE IN BIOMATERIALS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Fatigue Fundamentals

  • •Failure from cyclic loading BELOW ultimate tensile strength
  • •S-N curve: stress (S) vs cycles to failure (N)
  • •High stress = low cycle fatigue; low stress = high cycle
  • •Walking: 2 million cycles/year; implant needs 40M+ for 20 years

Endurance Limit

  • •Ferrous metals (steel): TRUE endurance limit at ~30-40% UTS
  • •Titanium: NO true limit, fatigue limit at 10^7 cycles (~60% UTS)
  • •Cobalt-chrome: NO true limit, fatigue limit at 10^7 cycles
  • •Design must include safety factor 2-3x below fatigue limit

Three Stages of Fatigue

  • •Stage I: Crack initiation (surface defect, notch, stress concentration)
  • •Stage II: Stable propagation (Paris law: da/dN = C(ΔK)^m)
  • •Stage III: Final fracture (crack reaches critical size K_IC)
  • •Most of life spent in Stage I (initiation)

Factors Reducing Fatigue Life

  • •Higher stress amplitude or mean stress
  • •Corrosion (fretting, crevice, pitting) - accelerates significantly
  • •Surface roughness and notches (stress concentration)
  • •Tensile residual stresses (add to applied stress)

Clinical Failures

  • •Plate fracture: Delayed/nonunion (1M+ cycles over 6-12 months)
  • •Screw breakage: Stress concentration at threads
  • •Modular taper fracture: Fretting corrosion + cyclic loading
  • •Prevention: Achieve bony union early (reduce load cycles)
Quick Stats
Reading Time51 min
Related Topics

Abductor Digiti Minimi - Anatomy and Clinical Relevance

Bioabsorbable Materials

Bone Grafts

Calcium Phosphate Cements