Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Forequarter Amputation

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Forequarter Amputation

Comprehensive guide to forequarter amputation - indications (tumour, trauma, infection), anterior vs posterior approach, vascular control, brachial plexus management, flap options, prosthetic rehabilitation, psychological support for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2025-01-08
High Yield Overview

FOREQUARTER AMPUTATION

Shoulder Girdle Ablation | Subclavian Vessel Control | Brachial Plexus Division | Oncological Margins

90%Oncological indication
SubclavianFirst vessel to control
AnteriorPreferred approach for tumours
MDTEssential multidisciplinary care

INDICATIONS FOR FOREQUARTER AMPUTATION

Malignancy (90%)
PatternProximal sarcoma, brachial plexus invasion, failed limb salvage
TreatmentWide margins, oncological principles, MDT decision
Trauma
PatternBrachial plexus avulsion, unreconstructible vascular injury
TreatmentLife before limb, staged approach if unstable
Infection
PatternNecrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene, uncontrolled sepsis
TreatmentEmergent ablation, staged closure
Palliative
PatternFungating tumour, intractable pain, non-functional limb
TreatmentQuality of life focused, symptom control

Critical Must-Knows

  • Subclavian vessels are controlled first - either from anterior (infraclavicular) or posterior (supraclavicular) approach
  • Brachial plexus is divided sharply under tension, allowing retraction to reduce neuroma formation
  • Anterior approach preferred for oncological cases - better visualization of neurovascular structures
  • Posterior approach used when tumour involves anterior chest wall or for massive posterior tumours
  • Clavicle division at junction of middle and lateral thirds; scapula removed en bloc with specimen

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Control subclavian artery BEFORE vein to prevent venous engorgement and bleeding
  • "
    Preserve pectoralis major if oncologically safe - provides soft tissue coverage
  • "
    Divide brachial plexus roots proximally if tumour involves cords or divisions
  • "
    Staged reconstruction with latissimus flap if primary closure not possible

Critical Forequarter Amputation Exam Points

Vascular Control Sequence

Control subclavian artery FIRST, then vein. Arterial control before venous control prevents limb engorgement and reduces blood loss. Access via infraclavicular approach (anterior) or supraclavicular approach. Know the relationship to scalenus anterior - subclavian artery is posterior, vein is anterior. Thoracic duct on LEFT side must be identified and ligated.

Oncological Margins

Wide surgical margins are non-negotiable. For sarcomas, aim for at least 2cm soft tissue margin or fascial plane. Biopsy track must be excised en bloc. Do NOT enter the tumour - contamination significantly worsens prognosis. Frozen section margins if needed. Plan incision to allow limb salvage conversion if margins positive.

Brachial Plexus Division

Level of division depends on tumour extent. For tumours not involving the plexus, divide at the level of cords or divisions. For plexus invasion, divide at root level (requires supraclavicular dissection). Traction neurectomy technique - sharp division under tension, allow proximal retraction. Phantom limb pain occurs in 60-80%.

Psychological Impact

Upper limb loss causes profound psychological impact. Body image disturbance, loss of independence, occupational implications are significant. Involve psychology/psychiatry EARLY. Prosthetic options are limited but provide cosmesis. Realistic expectation setting is crucial - discuss inability to replicate hand function.

Anterior vs Posterior Approach Selection

FactorAnterior ApproachPosterior ApproachRecommendation
Standard oncological resectionPreferred - direct access to vesselsAlternative if anterior chest involvedDefault to anterior approach
Tumour involving anterior chest wallMay require chest wall resectionPreferred - avoids tumour manipulationPosterior approach safer
Tumour involving posterior scapulaPreferred - vessels controlled earlyRisk of tumour spillageAnterior approach preferred
Brachial plexus invasion at rootsRequires supraclavicular extensionBetter access to proximal rootsCombine approaches as needed
Trauma or infectionRapid vascular controlMay be faster for debridementDepends on injury pattern
Previous surgery or radiationMay have scarring in vesselsAlternative if anterior scarredPlan based on imaging and history
Mnemonic

CLAVICLE SCAPULAForequarter Amputation - Anterior Approach Steps

C
Clavicle incision
Start incision along clavicle, extend inferiorly
L
Ligate vessels
Control subclavian artery then vein infraclavicularly
A
Anterior muscles
Divide pectoralis major and minor from chest wall
V
Vessels and nerves
Divide brachial plexus, remaining vessels
I
Incise clavicle
Osteotomy at junction of middle and lateral thirds
C
Circumferential dissection
Free scapula from chest wall
L
Latissimus and posterior muscles
Divide trapezius, rhomboids, latissimus, serratus
E
En bloc removal
Remove entire specimen as single unit

Memory Hook:Follow the CLAVICLE first, then sweep around to the SCAPULA - the two bones you're removing

Mnemonic

SAVBNStructures to Control

S
Subclavian artery
Control FIRST - posterior to scalenus anterior
A
Axillary vessels
Continuation of subclavian - may ligate here if easier
V
Vein (subclavian)
Control AFTER artery - anterior to scalenus anterior
B
Brachial plexus
Divide sharply under tension at appropriate level
N
Nerve (thoracic duct)
LEFT side only - ligate to prevent chylothorax

Memory Hook:SAVBN - Save the patient by controlling vessels in order: S-Artery, V-Vein, B-Plexus, N-thoracic duct

Mnemonic

TIPSForequarter Amputation Indications

T
Tumour
Primary sarcoma, metastatic disease, failed limb salvage (90%)
I
Infection
Necrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene, uncontrolled sepsis
P
Plexus injury
Brachial plexus avulsion with useless painful limb
S
Salvage not possible
Massive trauma, radiation necrosis, vascular catastrophe

Memory Hook:TIPS for when the limb must go - Tumour leads the way

Overview and Epidemiology

Forequarter amputation (interscapulothoracic amputation) is the ablation of the entire upper extremity including the scapula and lateral clavicle. First described by Ralph Cuming in 1808 and refined by Paul Berger in 1887, it represents the most radical amputation of the upper limb.

Epidemiology:

  • Rare procedure - most major centres perform fewer than 5 per year
  • Approximately 90% of cases are for oncological indications
  • Malignant tumours: soft tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas, metastatic disease
  • Peak age: Bimodal - young adults (primary sarcomas) and elderly (metastatic disease)
  • Male slight predominance (1.5:1)

Forequarter vs Shoulder Disarticulation

Forequarter amputation removes the entire shoulder girdle (scapula, lateral clavicle, humerus, and all soft tissues) leaving a smooth chest wall. Shoulder disarticulation preserves the scapula and clavicle, disarticulating at the glenohumeral joint. Forequarter is required when tumour involves the scapula, proximal humerus with soft tissue extension, or brachial plexus invasion.

Indications:

Malignancy (90%)

  • Soft tissue sarcomas: MFH, synovial sarcoma, liposarcoma with proximal extension
  • Bone sarcomas: Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma when limb salvage not possible
  • Metastatic disease: Renal cell carcinoma, melanoma with local invasion
  • Failed limb salvage: Local recurrence after previous surgery
  • Brachial plexus invasion: Pancoast tumour extension

Non-Oncological (10%)

  • Trauma: Brachial plexus avulsion with flail anaesthetic limb
  • Vascular catastrophe: Unreconstructible axillary/subclavian injury
  • Infection: Necrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene, severe sepsis
  • Radiation necrosis: Brachial plexopathy with non-functional painful limb
  • Palliative: Fungating tumour causing suffering

Contraindications (Relative):

  • Distant metastatic disease (relative - may still be palliative indication)
  • Poor general health precluding major surgery
  • Chest wall invasion requiring pneumonectomy (very high mortality)
  • Patient refusal after informed consent
  • Inadequate soft tissue for closure

Anatomy

Key Anatomical Structures

Understanding the anatomy is critical for safe forequarter amputation. The procedure involves controlling major neurovascular structures and dividing muscular attachments systematically.

Arterial Anatomy

Subclavian Artery:

  • Becomes axillary artery at lateral border of first rib
  • Relationship to scalenus anterior muscle is critical:
    • First part: Medial to scalenus anterior (3 branches)
    • Second part: Behind scalenus anterior (1 branch - costocervical trunk)
    • Third part: Lateral to scalenus anterior (1 branch - dorsal scapular sometimes)
  • Control is achieved infraclavicularly or supraclavicularly

Venous Anatomy:

  • Subclavian vein is ANTERIOR to scalenus anterior
  • More superficial than artery - encountered first in dissection
  • Fragile wall - handle carefully
  • Left side: Thoracic duct enters at junction with internal jugular vein

Thoracic Duct (Left Side)

On the LEFT side, the thoracic duct must be identified and ligated. It enters the venous system at the junction of the left subclavian and internal jugular veins. Injury causes chylothorax - persistent lymphatic leak into the chest. If damaged, ligate proximally and distally.

Brachial Plexus Anatomy

Structure:

  • Roots: C5, C6, C7, C8, T1 (between scalenus anterior and medius)
  • Trunks: Upper (C5,6), Middle (C7), Lower (C8, T1)
  • Divisions: Anterior and posterior
  • Cords: Lateral, posterior, medial (named by relation to axillary artery)

Surgical Significance:

  • Level of division depends on tumour extent
  • Standard: Divide at cord level in axilla
  • Tumour involving cords: Divide at trunk/division level
  • Plexus invasion: Divide at root level (supraclavicular dissection)

Traction Neurectomy:

  1. Identify nerves proximally
  2. Apply gentle longitudinal traction
  3. Sharp transection with fresh blade
  4. Allow retraction into proximal tissues

Phantom Limb Considerations:

  • Phantom sensations occur in nearly 100% of patients
  • Phantom limb pain in 60-80%
  • Preoperative pain is strongest predictor
  • Perioperative regional anesthesia may reduce incidence

Muscles Requiring Division

Anterior Muscles (Chest to Upper Limb):

  • Pectoralis major: Clavicular and sternal heads from humerus
  • Pectoralis minor: From coracoid process
  • Subclavius: Deep to clavicle

Posterior Muscles (Scapula to Spine):

  • Trapezius: Along medial scapular border
  • Rhomboid major and minor: Medial scapula to spine
  • Levator scapulae: Superior angle of scapula
  • Latissimus dorsi: May be preserved for flap if oncologically safe
  • Serratus anterior: Along medial scapular border

Upper Arm Muscles:

  • All arm muscles divided distally with specimen

Muscle Preservation Strategy

Preserve pectoralis major if oncologically safe - provides vital soft tissue coverage over the chest wall. If tumour is posterior and pectoralis not involved, preserve its sternal head for closure. Latissimus dorsi can be preserved and rotated as a flap if large skin defect anticipated.

Bone Management

Clavicle Division:

  • Standard level: Junction of middle and lateral thirds
  • Allows adequate margin from medial tumours
  • Preserves sternoclavicular joint for stability
  • Use oscillating saw or Gigli saw
  • Smooth sharp edges to prevent skin breakdown

Scapula:

  • Removed en bloc with specimen
  • All muscular attachments divided circumferentially
  • If tumour involves only lateral scapula, partial scapulectomy may be possible (not forequarter)

Chest Wall Considerations:

  • If tumour invades chest wall, en bloc rib resection required
  • May need thoracic surgery involvement
  • Reconstruction with mesh and/or flap

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

Presentation by Aetiology

Oncological Presentation

Typical Presentation:

  • Progressively enlarging mass in proximal upper limb or shoulder girdle
  • Pain - present in 50-70% of sarcomas at presentation
  • Neurological symptoms if brachial plexus involved
  • Vascular symptoms if axillary vessels compressed/invaded

Red Flags for Malignancy:

  • Mass greater than 5 cm
  • Deep to fascia
  • Increasing in size
  • Painful
  • Recurrence after previous excision

Indications for Forequarter (Rather than Limb Salvage):

  • Tumour involving neurovascular bundle that cannot be reconstructed
  • Brachial plexus invasion by tumour
  • Massive soft tissue involvement precluding functional limb
  • Pathological fracture with extensive contamination
  • Failed previous limb salvage with local recurrence
  • Patient preference after informed discussion

Limb Salvage vs Amputation Decision

Limb salvage is preferred when oncologically equivalent. Forequarter amputation is indicated when: (1) Neurovascular bundle involved and unreconstructible, (2) Brachial plexus invaded by tumour, (3) Massive soft tissue involvement, (4) Local recurrence after previous limb salvage. The decision is made by the MDT including orthopaedic oncologist, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and radiologist.

Traumatic Indications

Brachial Plexus Avulsion:

  • High-energy motorcycle injuries most common
  • Complete avulsion (C5-T1) results in flail, anaesthetic arm
  • Chronic pain syndromes common
  • If reconstruction not possible, forequarter may improve quality of life

Massive Trauma:

  • Unreconstructible vascular injury with prolonged ischaemia
  • Extensive soft tissue loss precluding reconstruction
  • Combined bone, nerve, and vessel injury

Assessment:

  • Detailed neurological examination
  • Vascular status (angiography)
  • MRI for plexus integrity
  • Psychological assessment before elective amputation
  • Trial period of observation (may adapt to non-functional limb)

Infection Indications

Life-Threatening Sepsis:

  • Necrotizing fasciitis with proximal spread
  • Gas gangrene (Clostridial myonecrosis)
  • Uncontrolled sepsis despite debridement
  • Source control required for survival

Principles:

  • Life before limb - do not delay for definitive closure
  • Guillotine amputation may be required initially
  • Staged definitive closure when sepsis controlled
  • ICU support typically required

Palliative Indications

Quality of Life Focused:

  • Fungating, malodorous tumour causing suffering
  • Intractable pain not controlled by other means
  • Non-functional limb with chronic complications
  • Radiation necrosis with non-healing wounds

Considerations:

  • Life expectancy and goals of care
  • Symptom burden vs surgical risk
  • Patient autonomy and informed consent
  • Alternative palliative measures exhausted
  • Psychological preparedness

Preoperative Workup

Preoperative Assessment Protocol

OncologicalTumour Staging and Planning

Essential for malignancy:

  • MRI of entire limb (local staging, skip lesions)
  • CT chest (pulmonary metastases)
  • PET-CT if indicated (distant staging)
  • Biopsy confirmation (prior to any surgery)
  • Review biopsy track for excision planning
  • MDT discussion and consensus
VascularVascular Assessment

All cases:

  • Clinical pulse examination
  • Doppler assessment
  • CT angiography (vessel involvement by tumour, anatomy)
  • Plan for vessel ligation level
  • Cardiac risk assessment
FunctionalFunctional and Psychological

Critical for outcomes:

  • Dominant hand assessment
  • Occupational therapy input (ADL assessment)
  • Psychological assessment (mandatory before elective amputation)
  • Realistic expectations discussion
  • Prosthetic options counselling
  • Social work input (financial, vocational)
MedicalMedical Optimization

Preoperative checklist:

  • Full blood count, coagulation, group and screen (crossmatch 4 units)
  • Renal and liver function
  • Cardiac assessment (echo if indicated)
  • Nutritional status (albumin greater than 30 g/L)
  • Smoking cessation
  • Anaesthetic review

Surgical Technique

Anterior (Berger) Approach

Indications:

  • Standard approach for most oncological cases
  • Preferred when tumour is posterior
  • Provides early vascular control
  • Better visualization of neurovascular structures

Positioning:

  • Semi-lateral decubitus or supine with sandbag
  • Arm free-draped
  • Access to both anterior and posterior chest

Incision:

  • Start at sternoclavicular joint
  • Along clavicle to acromioclavicular joint
  • Curve inferolaterally around deltoid
  • Continue down medial arm to axilla
  • Return across chest wall below pectoralis

Anterior Approach Operative Steps

Step 1Skin and Superficial Dissection

Incise skin along marked line.

Raise skin flaps anteriorly and posteriorly.

Preserve pectoralis major if oncologically safe.

Identify clavicle and prepare for osteotomy site.

Step 2Infraclavicular Vascular Control

Critical step - control vessels BEFORE mobilization.

Incise clavipectoral fascia below clavicle.

Identify subclavian/axillary artery - control with vessel loops.

Identify subclavian/axillary vein - control with vessel loops.

Ligate and divide artery FIRST, then vein.

On LEFT side, identify and ligate thoracic duct.

Step 3Clavicle Division

Divide clavicle at junction of middle and lateral thirds.

Use oscillating saw or Gigli saw.

Clear periosteum to prevent bone regrowth.

Smooth cut edges with rasp.

Lateral fragment stays with specimen.

Step 4Brachial Plexus Division

Level of division depends on tumour extent.

Standard: Divide cords in axilla.

If plexus involved: Divide at trunk level or root level.

Apply gentle traction to each cord/trunk.

Sharp transection with fresh blade.

Allow proximal retraction.

Step 5Anterior Muscle Division

Divide pectoralis major (or reflect if preserving).

Divide pectoralis minor from coracoid.

Divide subclavius muscle.

Release all anterior attachments of specimen.

Step 6Circumferential Scapula Release

Turn patient or work posteriorly.

Divide trapezius along medial scapular border.

Divide rhomboid major and minor.

Divide levator scapulae.

Divide serratus anterior from chest wall.

Divide latissimus dorsi (or preserve for flap).

Step 7Final Checks and Closure

Remove specimen en bloc.

Confirm haemostasis - inspect chest wall carefully.

Check for pleural injury.

Myoplasty: Approximate residual muscles over chest wall.

Closed suction drains.

Skin closure - consider flap if defect large.

Posterior (Littlewood) Approach

Indications:

  • Tumour involving anterior chest wall
  • Massive posterior tumour where anterior manipulation risky
  • Previous anterior surgery with scarring
  • Surgeon preference

Positioning:

  • Lateral decubitus position
  • Arm draped free
  • Posterior access primary

Incision:

  • Start at acromioclavicular joint
  • Along spine of scapula to medial border
  • Continue inferiorly along medial scapular border
  • Curve anteriorly below scapular tip
  • Continue to axilla

Posterior Approach Operative Steps

Step 1Posterior Dissection

Begin with posterior muscle division.

Incise trapezius along medial scapular border.

Divide rhomboid major and minor.

Divide levator scapulae at superior angle.

Release medial scapular attachments.

Step 2Serratus and Chest Wall

Free scapula from chest wall.

Divide serratus anterior slips systematically.

Identify long thoracic nerve (preserve if oncologically safe).

Work around inferior angle of scapula.

Step 3Axillary Approach to Vessels

Approach vessels from axilla or supraclavicular.

May need to turn patient or use combined approach.

Identify axillary artery and vein.

Control with vessel loops.

Ligate and divide.

Step 4Brachial Plexus and Clavicle

Divide brachial plexus as per anterior approach.

Divide clavicle at appropriate level.

Complete anterior muscle release.

Remove specimen en bloc.

Step 5Closure

Haemostasis and chest wall inspection.

Myoplasty with remaining muscles.

Drains as needed.

Skin closure or flap.

Soft Tissue Coverage Options

Primary Closure:

  • Possible in most cases if skin flaps planned well
  • Preserve pectoralis major for coverage
  • Avoid tension - leads to wound breakdown

Local Flaps:

Flap Options for Forequarter Amputation

FlapPedicleAdvantagesDisadvantages
Pectoralis majorThoracoacromial arteryAlready in field, robustMay be involved by tumour
Latissimus dorsiThoracodorsal arteryLarge, reliable, can reachMay be resected with tumour
Trapezius flapTransverse cervical arteryGood for posterior defectsLimited reach anteriorly
Free flapVarious (ALT, rectus)Large defects, irradiated fieldRequires microsurgery, longer surgery

Flap Selection Principles:

  • Assess which muscles are preserved after resection
  • Latissimus dorsi is most versatile if available
  • Free flap for large defects or radiated tissue
  • Involve plastic surgery early in planning

Intraoperative Complications

Haemorrhage:

  • Meticulous vessel control is key
  • Have vascular surgery available for complex cases
  • Cell saver useful for blood conservation
  • Proximal control before tumour manipulation

Pleural Injury:

  • Chest wall dissection may breach pleura
  • If small: Primary repair, chest drain
  • If large: Formal chest drain, post-op CXR
  • Tension pneumothorax - immediate decompression

Brachial Plexus Issues:

  • Inadequate proximal control - need supraclavicular extension
  • Frozen tumour involving roots - may need spine surgery input

Inadequate Margins:

  • Frozen section for bone and soft tissue margins
  • If positive, extend resection if possible
  • Discuss with oncology if positive margins unavoidable

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Immediate Postoperative Care

Day 0-1:

  • ICU or high-dependency monitoring
  • Monitor for haemorrhage (drain output, haemoglobin)
  • Chest X-ray to exclude pneumothorax
  • DVT prophylaxis (mechanical and pharmacological)
  • Analgesia: Multimodal approach (regional block if possible)
  • Psychological support initiated

Day 1-5:

  • Mobilization with physiotherapy
  • Wound inspection at 48 hours
  • Drain removal when output less than 30 ml/24 hours
  • Respiratory physiotherapy
  • Psychology review

Discharge Planning:

  • Wound care instructions
  • Physiotherapy exercises
  • Outpatient psychology follow-up
  • Prosthetic referral when wound healed
  • Oncology follow-up for adjuvant therapy

Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Prosthetic Options

Cosmetic Prosthesis:

  • Lightweight, realistic appearance
  • No active function
  • Improves body image and clothing fit
  • Most commonly chosen option

Functional Prosthesis:

  • Body-powered or myoelectric
  • Limited function compared to lower limb prosthetics
  • Requires significant training
  • Heavy, often abandoned

Realistic Expectations

Upper limb prosthetics cannot replicate hand function. Unlike lower limb prosthetics which can restore walking, upper limb prosthetics provide limited functional restoration. Many patients adapt to one-handed function rather than using prosthesis. Cosmetic benefit is primary value for most.

Psychological Support

Impact of Upper Limb Loss:

  • Body image disturbance is profound
  • Loss of independence for bilateral activities
  • Occupational implications (may not return to previous work)
  • Social and intimacy concerns
  • Phantom limb sensations and pain

Mandatory Psychological Input:

  • Preoperative counselling and assessment
  • Postoperative support and monitoring
  • Peer support groups
  • Long-term psychological follow-up
  • Treatment for depression, PTSD if needed

Suicide Risk

Patients undergoing major upper limb amputation are at increased risk of depression and suicide. This is particularly true for traumatic amputations in young patients. Early psychological intervention, ongoing monitoring, and appropriate psychiatric referral are essential components of care.

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Forequarter Amputation for Sarcoma Outcomes

4
Bhagia SM, Elek EM, Grimer RJ, et al. • J Bone Joint Surg Br (1997)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 51 forequarter amputations for malignancy
  • 5-year survival: 34% (varying by tumour grade and stage)
  • Local recurrence rate: 16%
  • Major complications: 25% (wound problems, haemorrhage)
  • Most patients (70%) returned to modified employment
Clinical Implication: Forequarter amputation provides acceptable local control and survival in selected patients with proximal upper limb sarcomas not amenable to limb salvage.
Limitation: Retrospective, single centre, heterogeneous tumour types.

Quality of Life After Forequarter Amputation

4
Wittig JC, Bickels J, Kollender Y, et al. • Clin Orthop Relat Res (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective quality of life assessment in forequarter amputees
  • Physical function scores lower than general population
  • Mental health and social function comparable to population norms
  • Patients adapted well psychologically over time
  • Cosmetic prosthesis improved body image satisfaction
Clinical Implication: Despite significant physical limitation, most patients achieve acceptable quality of life and psychological adjustment after forequarter amputation with appropriate support.
Limitation: Small sample size, selection bias, single-centre study.

Phantom Limb Pain After Upper Limb Amputation

3
Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, et al. • Arch Phys Med Rehabil (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study of phantom phenomena after upper limb amputation
  • Phantom limb pain occurred in 51% of patients
  • Phantom sensations (non-painful) in 80%
  • Preoperative pain was significant risk factor
  • Pain decreased over time but persisted in many
Clinical Implication: Phantom limb pain is common after upper limb amputation. Preoperative pain is a risk factor, supporting aggressive perioperative pain management.
Limitation: Mixed amputation levels, no control group for intervention.

Brachial Plexus Avulsion - Outcomes of Amputation

4
Birch R, Bonney G, Wynn Parry CB • In: Surgical Disorders of Peripheral Nerves (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Experience with brachial plexus injuries and management
  • Amputation indicated for complete avulsion with intractable pain
  • Majority of patients reported pain improvement after amputation
  • Psychological adjustment variable
  • Careful patient selection essential
Clinical Implication: Forequarter amputation can improve quality of life in selected patients with complete brachial plexus avulsion and intractable pain, but psychological assessment and realistic expectations are essential.
Limitation: Expert opinion and case series level evidence.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old woman presents with a large high-grade soft tissue sarcoma involving the proximal humerus, deltoid, and extending to the brachial plexus on MRI. CT chest shows no pulmonary metastases. The MDT has recommended forequarter amputation. How would you counsel this patient and describe your surgical approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a challenging situation requiring careful counselling and systematic surgical planning. For preoperative counselling, I would explain that limb salvage is not possible due to brachial plexus involvement. I would discuss the extent of surgery - removal of the entire arm, scapula, and part of the clavicle. I would address the psychological impact with formal psychology assessment, explain prosthetic options (mainly cosmetic), and discuss expected functional outcome with one-handed adaptation. I would emphasize that the goal is cure and quality of life, and ensure she has time to process and access support services. For surgical planning, I would use an anterior (Berger) approach for this case as it provides early vascular control and the tumour is involving the lateral structures. I would position her semi-lateral with the arm free. The key steps are: First, make the incision along the clavicle, around the deltoid, down the arm, and across the chest. Second, achieve early infraclavicular vascular control - I would identify and control the subclavian/axillary artery FIRST, then the vein. Third, divide the clavicle at the junction of middle and lateral thirds. Fourth, since the brachial plexus is involved by tumour, I would divide the plexus at the level of trunks or roots via supraclavicular extension, ensuring adequate margin. Fifth, release all anterior muscles (pectoralis major if involved, otherwise preserve for coverage). Sixth, work posteriorly to release trapezius, rhomboids, serratus anterior, and latissimus. Finally, remove the specimen en bloc, achieve haemostasis, and close with myoplasty of remaining muscles. I would ensure drains are placed and arrange ICU monitoring postoperatively.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Multidisciplinary decision - this is not a solo surgeon decision
Psychology assessment mandatory before amputation
Anterior approach preferred - early vascular control
Control artery BEFORE vein to prevent engorgement
Plexus division at trunk/root level if involved by tumour
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not involving psychology preoperatively
✗Attempting limb salvage when margins will be compromised
✗Controlling vein before artery (causes bleeding)
✗Cutting through tumour - must be en bloc resection
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if frozen section shows positive margin at the clavicle?"
"How would you manage a chest wall defect if the tumour involved ribs?"
"What prosthetic options would you discuss with the patient?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old motorcyclist sustained a complete brachial plexus avulsion (C5-T1) 18 months ago. His arm is flail and anaesthetic. He has severe chronic neuropathic pain despite maximal medical therapy and has requested amputation. How would you approach this case?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a complex case requiring careful assessment before proceeding with elective amputation. My approach would involve several phases. For assessment, I would first confirm the diagnosis with nerve conduction studies, EMG, and MRI confirming complete avulsion. I would review all pain management trials - medications (gabapentinoids, antidepressants, opioids), interventional procedures (nerve blocks, spinal cord stimulation), and rehabilitation approaches. I would assess his functional status and how he has adapted. Most critically, I would ensure comprehensive psychological assessment - confirming realistic expectations, no active psychiatric illness that would worsen with amputation, and genuine motivation. For counselling, I would explain that amputation may reduce pain but is not guaranteed - phantom limb pain occurs in 50-60% of patients. I would discuss that he is trading a non-functional limb for no limb, and prosthetic function for upper limb is limited. I would emphasize this is an irreversible decision. I would require a cooling-off period and multiple consultations. If proceeding, for surgical planning I would use an anterior approach as there is no tumour concern. I would provide meticulous nerve handling - traction neurectomy with sharp division at root level, allowing maximal retraction. I would preserve pectoralis major for coverage. The focus would be on creating a smooth, well-padded chest wall contour. Postoperatively, I would arrange psychological follow-up, phantom pain prophylaxis and management, and prosthetic referral when ready.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Complete psychological assessment mandatory before elective amputation
Confirm all pain management options exhausted
Realistic expectations - phantom pain may still occur
Cooling-off period between decision and surgery
This is quality of life surgery - patient must be well-informed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to surgery without proper psychological assessment
✗Promising pain relief - phantom pain is common
✗Not exploring all non-surgical pain options first
✗Ignoring signs of psychiatric illness or unrealistic expectations
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient develops severe phantom limb pain after amputation?"
"What is the evidence for amputation in brachial plexus avulsion?"
"How would you manage the chronic pain preoperatively?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"During a forequarter amputation for a proximal sarcoma, you encounter brisk bleeding when dividing tissues in the infraclavicular region. Describe your management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Intraoperative haemorrhage during forequarter amputation is a serious situation requiring calm, systematic management. My immediate actions would be to apply direct digital pressure to the bleeding point and call for additional suction and assistance. I would ensure adequate IV access and alert the anaesthetist to potential significant blood loss. I would request blood products be prepared. For assessment while maintaining pressure, I would identify the source - most likely subclavian or axillary vessels or a major branch. I would assess whether this is arterial or venous bleeding. For definitive control, if proximal control is needed, I would extend the incision supraclavicularly to gain control of the subclavian artery proximal to the bleeding point. I would consider clavicle division early if it would improve access. I would use vessel loops for proximal and distal control before attempting repair or ligation. For repair or ligation, given this is an amputation, vessel ligation rather than repair is the goal. I would apply vascular clamps once proximal control achieved. I would ligate with non-absorbable suture - doubly ligate for major vessels. If vessel is damaged but not transected, I would consider suture repair only if it would facilitate safer subsequent ligation. My prevention strategy for the remainder of the procedure would be systematic approach - always identify and control vessels before dividing. I would use vessel loops on all major structures before cutting and ensure good visualization with adequate retraction and lighting.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Direct pressure while gaining proximal control
Supraclavicular extension for proximal subclavian control
Vessel ligation is the goal - this is an amputation
Call for help early - vascular surgery if needed
Prevention - control vessels before cutting
COMMON TRAPS
✗Panicking and blind clamping (can damage other structures)
✗Not having adequate blood products available
✗Failing to get proximal control before attempting repair
✗Not extending incision when better access is needed
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the relationship of the subclavian artery to scalenus anterior?"
"How would you manage a thoracic duct injury?"
"What are the indications for cell saver in this surgery?"

Australian Context

Epidemiology and Referral Patterns

Forequarter amputation is a rare procedure in Australia, with major sarcoma centres performing fewer than 5 cases annually. Primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas requiring this level of amputation are typically managed at designated sarcoma services, most commonly located in major metropolitan tertiary centres. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) does not track amputations, but state cancer registries monitor sarcoma outcomes.

Treatment Pathways

Patients with suspected sarcomas requiring forequarter amputation should be referred to a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team (MDT) prior to any surgical intervention, including biopsy. The MDT typically includes orthopaedic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, specialist radiologists, pathologists, and allied health professionals. Treatment decisions, particularly the choice between limb salvage and amputation, are made collectively by the MDT with patient input.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments including chemotherapy and radiation therapy are provided through public hospital oncology departments or private oncology services. PBS-listed medications for sarcoma treatment are available, and TGA-approved prosthetic devices can be accessed through state-based artificial limb schemes.

Rehabilitation and Support Services

Prosthetic services in Australia are provided through state-funded artificial limb schemes and private providers. Upper limb prosthetics are less developed than lower limb, reflecting the limited functional restoration possible. Cosmetic prostheses are commonly chosen for improved body image. Psychological support services are available through hospital psychology departments, private practitioners, and organisations such as Limbs 4 Life which provides peer support for amputees. Access to occupational therapy for adaptation to one-handed living, vocational rehabilitation, and disability employment services are important components of the recovery pathway.

Forequarter Amputation

High-Yield Exam Summary

Indications

  • •Tumour (90%): Proximal sarcoma, plexus invasion, failed limb salvage
  • •Trauma: Brachial plexus avulsion with useless painful limb
  • •Infection: Necrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene (life before limb)
  • •Palliative: Fungating tumour, intractable pain

Approach Selection

  • •Anterior (Berger): Standard for oncology, early vessel control
  • •Posterior (Littlewood): Anterior chest wall involvement
  • •Combined: Large tumours, plexus invasion at roots

Critical Surgical Steps

  • •Control subclavian ARTERY first, then VEIN (prevents engorgement)
  • •Left side: Identify and ligate thoracic duct (prevents chylothorax)
  • •Clavicle division: Junction of middle and lateral thirds
  • •Brachial plexus: Divide at cords (standard) or roots (if invaded)
  • •Preserve pectoralis major if oncologically safe for coverage

Vascular Relations

  • •Subclavian artery: POSTERIOR to scalenus anterior
  • •Subclavian vein: ANTERIOR to scalenus anterior
  • •Thoracic duct: Left side only, enters at subclavian-IJV junction

Flap Options

  • •Pectoralis major: First choice if preserved
  • •Latissimus dorsi: Versatile if available
  • •Free flap: Large defects, irradiated field

Complications

  • •Haemorrhage: Meticulous vessel control, have blood ready
  • •Chylothorax: Left side thoracic duct injury - ligate
  • •Pneumothorax: Chest wall dissection - CXR post-op
  • •Phantom limb pain: 60-80%, multimodal treatment
  • •Psychological: Depression, body image - mandatory psychology

Prosthetics

  • •Cosmetic: Most common choice, lightweight, improves body image
  • •Functional: Limited utility, heavy, often abandoned
  • •Key message: Cannot replicate hand function

Key Numbers

  • •Phantom limb pain: 60-80%
  • •5-year survival (sarcoma): 30-40%
  • •Local recurrence: 15-20%
  • •Return to employment: 70%

References

  1. Bhagia SM, Elek EM, Grimer RJ, et al. Forequarter amputation for high-grade malignant tumours of the shoulder girdle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(6):924-926.

  2. Wittig JC, Bickels J, Kollender Y, et al. Palliative forequarter amputation for metastatic carcinoma to the shoulder girdle region: indications, preoperative evaluation, surgical technique, and results. J Surg Oncol. 2001;77(2):105-113.

  3. Malawer MM, Sugarbaker PH. Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery: Treatment of Sarcomas and Allied Diseases. Springer; 2001.

  4. Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, et al. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. 2000;87(1):33-41.

  5. Birch R, Bonney G, Wynn Parry CB. Surgical Disorders of Peripheral Nerves. Churchill Livingstone; 1998.

  6. Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Pynsent PB. The cost-effectiveness of limb salvage for bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(4):558-561.

  7. Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 12th ed. Elsevier; 2013.

  8. Damron TA, Sim FH. Forequarter amputation. In: Simon MA, Springfield D, eds. Surgery for Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors. Lippincott-Raven; 1998.

  9. Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, et al. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2206-2207.

  10. Flor H. Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1(3):182-189.

Quick Stats
Reading Time96 min
Related Topics

Synovial Cyst (Ganglion and Joint-Based Cysts)

Adamantinoma

Aneurysmal Bone Cyst

Angiosarcoma