Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Greater Tuberosity Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Greater Tuberosity Fractures

Comprehensive guide to greater tuberosity fractures including classification, management algorithms, and rotator cuff considerations for Orthopaedic examination

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

GREATER TUBEROSITY FRACTURES

Rotator Cuff Attachment Site | Displacement Threshold 5mm | Posterior Displacement Worst

5mmDisplacement threshold for surgery
15-20%Of proximal humerus fractures
15-30%Associated with anterior dislocations
3mmThreshold for overhead athletes

NEER CLASSIFICATION

Type I
PatternDisplacement under 5mm
TreatmentNon-operative
Type II
PatternDisplacement over 5mm
TreatmentSurgical fixation
Type III
PatternWith anterior dislocation
TreatmentReduce, then reassess

Critical Must-Knows

  • Three cuff attachments: Supraspinatus (superior), Infraspinatus (middle), Teres minor (inferior)
  • 5mm displacement is surgical threshold (3mm for overhead athletes)
  • Posterior displacement worst - limits external rotation function
  • Axillary view essential - shows posterior displacement (crescent sign)
  • Deltoid split must stay within 5cm of acromion to protect axillary nerve

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    GT fracture with dislocation often reduces after glenohumeral reduction
  • "
    Superior malunion causes impingement, posterior causes rotation loss
  • "
    Screw fixation for good bone, suture anchors for osteoporotic bone
  • "
    External rotation strength testing is key clinical assessment

Clinical Imaging

Greater Tuberosity Fracture Imaging

Greater tuberosity fracture with CT and surgical fixation
Click to expand
Three-panel imaging series demonstrating greater tuberosity fracture management. Panel (a): AP shoulder radiograph showing displaced greater tuberosity fragment (superolateral displacement) - note the separation from the proximal humerus. Panel (b): Axial CT scan showing glenohumeral joint relationship and fragment position. Panel (c): Post-operative AP radiograph showing anatomic reduction with screw fixation through a deltoid-splitting approach. Displacement greater than 5mm (or 3mm in overhead athletes) requires surgical fixation to restore rotator cuff function.Credit: PMC Open Access - CC BY 4.0
Multi-view radiographic assessment of GT fracture
Click to expand
Two-panel demonstrating the CRITICAL IMPORTANCE OF MULTI-VIEW RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT for greater tuberosity fractures. Left: AP shoulder view with white arrow pointing to displaced greater tuberosity fragment showing superior displacement. Right: Axillary or scapular-Y view with white arrow pointing to the same fracture, showing the fragment position relative to the glenoid. Key teaching points: (1) AP VIEW ALONE IS INSUFFICIENT - may miss significant posterior displacement which is functionally most important (limits external rotation), (2) AXILLARY VIEW IS ESSENTIAL - shows posterior displacement (most common direction due to pull of infraspinatus and teres minor), the 'crescent sign' (radiolucent fracture line), and rules out concurrent glenohumeral dislocation (15-30% of GT fractures occur with anterior dislocation), (3) Displacement must be measured on BOTH views - maximum displacement in any direction determines treatment (greater than 5mm or 3mm for overhead athletes indicates surgery). **Common clinical error**: treating based on AP view alone and missing posterior displacement shown only on axillary/lateral view. **Exam pearl**: 'The axillary view is the money shot for GT fractures' - it shows the posterior displacement that determines treatment decisions.Credit: Mattyasovszky SG et al. via Acta Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Complete diagnostic and surgical workflow for GT fracture
Click to expand
Multi-panel composite (5-6 panels) demonstrating the COMPLETE MANAGEMENT WORKFLOW for displaced greater tuberosity fracture from diagnosis through surgical treatment. Top row: Two AP shoulder radiographs with white arrows clearly pointing to displaced greater tuberosity fragment showing superior and lateral displacement characteristic of rotator cuff pull (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor). Small MRI panel shows the fracture and assesses rotator cuff integrity (20-30% have coexisting full-thickness tears). Bottom row: Two post-operative radiographs demonstrating anatomic reduction with multiple cannulated screws fixing the greater tuberosity fragment back to the proximal humerus. This workflow illustrates: (1) RADIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS with arrows marking classic displacement pattern, (2) MRI EVALUATION to assess fracture fragment size, displacement degree, and critical rotator cuff status, (3) SURGICAL INDICATION confirmed by displacement greater than 5mm (3mm threshold for overhead athletes), (4) SCREW FIXATION TECHNIQUE which is preferred for good bone quality (versus suture anchors for osteoporotic bone). The surgical goal is anatomic reduction to restore: rotator cuff length-tension relationship (prevents weakness), subacromial space (prevents impingement), and external rotation function (posterior displacement particularly limits this).Credit: Mattyasovszky SG et al. via Acta Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Screw fixation technique for GT fracture
Click to expand
Four-panel X-ray series demonstrating SCREW FIXATION TECHNIQUE - the gold standard for displaced GT fractures in good bone quality. Left two panels: Pre-operative AP and axillary shoulder views with white arrows clearly marking the displaced GT fragment showing both superior and posterior displacement. Right two panels: Post-operative AP and axillary views showing anatomic reduction maintained with multiple (typically 2-4) cannulated screws traversing from the greater tuberosity into the humeral head. Key technical principles illustrated: (1) MULTIPLE SCREWS REQUIRED - typically 2-4 screws to provide rotational stability and prevent fragment migration (single screw risks rotation and loss of reduction), (2) SCREW TRAJECTORY - directed from greater tuberosity into humeral head (not shaft) to provide purchase in cancellous bone, (3) ANATOMIC REDUCTION ESSENTIAL - post-operative images show restoration of normal GT position; superior malunion causes subacromial impingement, posterior malunion limits external rotation, (4) TWO-VIEW POST-OP ASSESSMENT - axillary view confirms no posterior displacement remains. Surgical approach is typically deltoid-splitting (must stay within 5cm of acromion to protect axillary nerve at 5-7cm distal) or anterolateral. Post-operative protocol: sling 4-6 weeks, progressive passive ROM, active ROM at 6 weeks, strengthening at 12 weeks.Credit: Mattyasovszky SG et al. via Acta Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Plate fixation alternative for GT fracture
Click to expand
Four-panel X-ray series demonstrating PLATE FIXATION as an alternative technique for greater tuberosity fractures. Left two panels: Pre-operative radiographs with white arrows marking the GT fracture. Right two panels: Post-operative images showing proximal humerus locking plate with multiple screws stabilizing the fracture. While isolated GT fractures are typically fixed with screws alone, plate fixation may be indicated when: (1) LARGE FRAGMENT with extension into surgical neck (fracture pattern approaching 2-part or 3-part proximal humerus fracture), (2) COMMINUTION of the GT fragment requiring buttressing support, (3) POOR BONE QUALITY where screws alone may not provide adequate purchase (osteoporotic patients), (4) REVISION SURGERY after failed screw fixation. The plate shown is a proximal humerus locking plate applied laterally. Key technical considerations: (a) Plate position must not protrude superiorly to avoid subacromial impingement, (b) Screws into GT fragment must capture rotator cuff tendons through bone (may use suture augmentation), (c) More extensive soft tissue dissection required compared to percutaneous screw technique. This image teaches that fixation strategy must be individualized - for PURE GT FRACTURES IN GOOD BONE, screws alone are preferred (less soft tissue stripping, smaller incision, fewer complications), while COMPLEX PATTERNS OR OSTEOPOROTIC BONE may necessitate plates or suture anchor techniques.Credit: Mattyasovszky SG et al. via Acta Orthop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Greater Tuberosity Exam Points

Displacement Threshold

5mm displacement is the standard surgical threshold. Use 3mm threshold for overhead athletes and laborers requiring full shoulder function. Posterior displacement is more functionally significant.

Rotator Cuff Anatomy

Three tendons attach to GT: Supraspinatus (superior facet), Infraspinatus (middle facet), Teres minor (inferior facet). The subscapularis attaches to lesser tuberosity.

Axillary Nerve Safety

Deltoid split approach must stay within 5cm of acromion. The axillary nerve courses 5-7cm distal to the lateral acromion. Document nerve function before and after any manipulation.

Post-Dislocation Assessment

15-30% of anterior dislocations have associated GT fracture. Often reduces with glenohumeral reduction. Repeat imaging (especially axillary view) after reduction.

At a Glance - Management Decision

PatternDisplacementPatient FactorsTreatment
Minimally displacedUnder 5mmAny patientNon-operative (sling, early ROM)
Borderline displacement3-5mmOverhead athlete/laborerConsider surgical fixation
Displaced fractureOver 5mmActive patientSurgical fixation (screw/anchor)
With anterior dislocationVariableAny patientReduce first, reassess displacement
Posterior displacementAnyActive patientStrong surgical indication
Mnemonic

SITSRotator Cuff Attachments to GT

S
Supraspinatus
Superior facet - most anterior attachment
I
Infraspinatus
Middle facet - largest footprint
T
Teres minor
Inferior facet - posterior attachment
S
Subscapularis
Attaches to LESSER tuberosity (not GT)

Memory Hook:SITS muscles but only first three attach to Greater Tuberosity - subscapularis sits on lesser!

Mnemonic

TUBERGT Fracture Assessment

T
Tendons
Three rotator cuff tendons attach (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor)
U
Upward
Superior displacement causes subacromial impingement
B
Behind
Posterior displacement worst - limits external rotation
E
External rotation
Key clinical test - compare to contralateral side
R
Reduce
GT often reduces after glenohumeral dislocation reduction

Memory Hook:The TUBER(osity) tells you what tendons attach and what displacement direction matters most!

Mnemonic

FIX GTSurgical Decision Making

F
Five mm
Standard displacement threshold for surgery
I
Impingement
Superior malunion causes painful impingement
X
X-ray views
AP, scapular Y, and axillary views essential
G
Good bone
Use screws for good bone, anchors for osteoporotic
T
Three mm
Lower threshold for overhead athletes/laborers

Memory Hook:FIX the GT when it meets surgical criteria!

Overview

Greater tuberosity fractures represent a clinically important subset of proximal humerus fractures due to their intimate relationship with rotator cuff function. The greater tuberosity serves as the attachment point for three of the four rotator cuff tendons - supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor.

Epidemiology

Incidence:

  • 15-20% of all proximal humerus fractures
  • Bimodal distribution: young males (high energy), elderly females (low energy)
  • 15-30% associated with anterior shoulder dislocations
  • Higher rate in contact sports and falls

Risk Factors:

  • Osteoporosis (elderly)
  • Contact sports participation
  • Seizure disorders
  • Alcohol intoxication

Mechanism of Injury

Direct Mechanism:

  • Fall onto lateral shoulder
  • Direct blow to shoulder

Indirect Mechanism:

  • Forceful abduction with external rotation
  • Avulsion by rotator cuff during dislocation
  • Hyperabduction injury

Associated Injuries:

  • Anterior shoulder dislocation (15-30%)
  • Rotator cuff tears
  • Hill-Sachs lesion
  • Bankart lesion

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

Anatomical Considerations

The greater tuberosity is a critical anatomic landmark that determines rotator cuff function and shoulder biomechanics.

Greater Tuberosity Structure:

  • Superior facet: Supraspinatus insertion
  • Middle facet: Infraspinatus insertion
  • Inferior facet: Teres minor insertion
  • Located lateral to the articular surface
  • Forms the lateral margin of the bicipital groove

Relationships:

  • Lesser tuberosity: Medial, subscapularis insertion
  • Bicipital groove: Between tuberosities
  • Anatomical neck: Between tuberosities and head
  • Surgical neck: Below tuberosities

Blood Supply:

  • Anterior humeral circumflex artery (ascending branch)
  • Posterior humeral circumflex artery
  • Rotator cuff tendon vessels

The greater tuberosity anatomy is crucial for understanding displacement patterns.

Supraspinatus:

  • Attaches to superior facet (most anterior portion of GT)
  • Primary abductor and external rotator
  • Most commonly injured rotator cuff tendon

Infraspinatus:

  • Attaches to middle facet (central portion of GT)
  • Primary external rotator
  • Largest footprint on greater tuberosity

Teres Minor:

  • Attaches to inferior facet (posterior portion of GT)
  • External rotation and adduction
  • Often intact in cuff tears

Combined Footprint:

  • Total footprint area: Approximately 6cm²
  • Important for surgical reconstruction

Understanding the rotator cuff footprint is essential for repair techniques.

Deforming Forces:

  • Supraspinatus pulls superiorly
  • Infraspinatus and teres minor pull posteriorly
  • Combined vector: Posterior and superior displacement

Clinical Significance:

  • Superior displacement causes subacromial impingement
  • Posterior displacement limits external rotation
  • Malunion leads to functional deficit and pain

Factors Affecting Displacement:

  • Fragment size
  • Bone quality
  • Associated injuries
  • Degree of rotator cuff involvement

Posterior-superior displacement is the most common and problematic pattern.

Exam Pearl

The "crescent sign" on axillary radiograph shows the displaced greater tuberosity fragment posterior to the humeral head, indicating significant displacement that typically requires surgical intervention.

Classification

Classification

Based on Displacement:

Type I - Minimally Displaced:

  • Fragment displaced less than 5mm
  • Often associated with undisplaced surgical neck fracture
  • Treated non-operatively in most patients

Type II - Displaced:

  • Fragment displaced more than 5mm or angulated over 45°
  • Significant functional deficit expected if not reduced
  • Surgical indication in active patients

Type III - Associated with Dislocation:

  • Greater tuberosity fracture with anterior shoulder dislocation
  • Fragment often reduces with glenohumeral reduction
  • Re-evaluate displacement after reduction

Neer classification remains primary for clinical decision-making.

Based on Fracture Pattern:

Avulsion Type:

  • Small cortical fragment
  • Strong cuff attachment pulls fragment
  • Often seen with dislocations

Depression Type:

  • Impaction of tuberosity
  • Associated with direct trauma
  • Less common pattern

Split Type:

  • Larger fragment involving more of tuberosity
  • Better bone stock for fixation
  • Often associated with surgical neck extension

Morphology influences surgical technique selection.

Superior Displacement:

  • Most common direction
  • Supraspinatus pull dominant
  • Causes subacromial impingement
  • Limits abduction

Posterior Displacement:

  • Combined cuff muscle pull
  • Limits external rotation
  • "Crescent sign" on axillary view
  • Worse functional outcome

Combined Superior-Posterior:

  • Most problematic pattern
  • Both impingement and rotation loss
  • Strong surgical indication

Posterior displacement carries worst prognosis for shoulder function.

Classification Summary

TypeDisplacementKey FeaturesTreatment
Neer Type IUnder 5mmMinimal displacement, stableNon-operative
Neer Type IIOver 5mmSignificant displacementSurgical fixation
Neer Type IIIVariableAssociated dislocationReduce first, reassess
AvulsionVariableSmall cortical fragmentSuture anchor fixation
SplitVariableLarger fragmentScrew or plate fixation

Clinical Assessment

History and Physical Examination

History

Mechanism:

  • Fall onto outstretched hand or shoulder
  • Direct blow to lateral shoulder
  • Dislocation event (ask about reduction)
  • Seizure activity
  • Motor vehicle accident

Symptoms:

  • Shoulder pain (lateral predominant)
  • Inability to lift arm
  • Weakness with external rotation
  • History of dislocation

Red Flags:

  • Numbness over deltoid (axillary nerve)
  • Severe weakness (complete cuff avulsion)
  • Vascular compromise

Thorough mechanism history helps predict associated injuries.

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Swelling over lateral shoulder
  • Ecchymosis (may extend to arm)
  • Arm held in adduction and internal rotation
  • Loss of normal shoulder contour

Palpation:

  • Point tenderness over greater tuberosity
  • Crepitus with gentle rotation
  • Assess for associated injuries

Range of Motion:

  • Active abduction limited and painful
  • External rotation weak and painful
  • Passive ROM may be preserved

Key Tests:

  • External rotation lag sign (indicates cuff avulsion)
  • Hornblower's sign (teres minor function)
  • Resisted external rotation strength

External rotation strength testing is critical and must be compared to contralateral side.

Neurovascular Assessment

Axillary Nerve:

  • Most commonly injured nerve
  • Test deltoid motor function
  • Test sensation over "regimental badge" area
  • Document before and after any manipulation

Brachial Plexus:

  • Complete motor examination
  • Sensory examination of upper limb
  • May be injured with high-energy mechanism

Vascular:

  • Axillary artery at risk with dislocation
  • Check distal pulses
  • Assess capillary refill
  • Consider angiography if concern

Document complete neurovascular examination before any reduction attempts.

ALWAYS document axillary nerve function before and after shoulder reduction. The nerve courses around the surgical neck and is vulnerable during both injury and reduction maneuvers.

Investigations

Imaging Studies

Trauma Series (3 Views Essential):

True AP (Grashey View):

  • Perpendicular to scapular plane
  • Shows glenohumeral joint space
  • Identifies fracture and displacement

Scapular Y View:

  • Lateral scapula projection
  • Confirms reduction status
  • Shows anterior/posterior displacement

Axillary View:

  • Shows posterior displacement ("crescent sign")
  • Identifies Hill-Sachs lesion
  • Confirms glenohumeral reduction
  • Most important view for displacement assessment

Velpeau Axillary:

  • Alternative if cannot abduct arm
  • Patient leans back over cassette
  • Useful in emergency setting

The axillary view is most important for assessing GT displacement.

Indications:

  • Surgical planning for displaced fractures
  • Assessment of fragment size and comminution
  • Evaluation of associated glenoid injury
  • Failed closed reduction assessment

Key Information:

  • Exact displacement measurement

  • Fragment size for fixation planning

  • Bone quality assessment

  • Associated Bankart or bony Bankart lesion

  • Hill-Sachs lesion size

    3D Reconstruction:

  • Excellent for surgical planning

  • Shows fracture geometry

  • Helps plan surgical approach

  • Useful for patient education

CT with 3D reconstruction is standard for surgical planning.

Indications:

  • Suspected rotator cuff pathology
  • Chronic or delayed presentation
  • Persistent weakness despite healed fracture
  • Pre-operative assessment of cuff quality

Key Findings:

  • Rotator cuff tear (partial or complete)
  • Muscle quality and atrophy
  • Associated labral pathology
  • Cartilage injury

Timing:

  • Not usually needed acutely
  • Consider if non-operative treatment fails
  • Useful at 6-8 weeks if persistent symptoms

MRI is reserved for suspected cuff pathology or delayed presentation.

Exam Pearl

The "crescent sign" on axillary radiograph indicates posterior displacement of the greater tuberosity fragment. This finding often indicates need for surgical intervention.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
greater tuberosity fractures management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for greater tuberosity fracturesCredit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Decision Making

Indications:

  • Displacement under 5mm (or under 3mm in athletes)
  • Elderly, low-demand patients with larger displacement
  • Significant medical comorbidities
  • Minimally displaced fracture-dislocation after reduction

Protocol:

Week 0-2:

  • Sling immobilization
  • Ice, analgesia
  • Gentle pendulum exercises

Week 2-6:

  • Progressive passive ROM
  • Active-assisted exercises
  • Avoid active abduction

Week 6-12:

  • Active ROM when healed
  • Strengthening exercises
  • Rotator cuff rehabilitation

After 12 weeks:

  • Full activities as tolerated
  • Sport-specific training
  • Return to work/sport based on function

Non-operative treatment yields excellent results in minimally displaced fractures.

Absolute Indications:

  • Displacement over 5mm in active patients
  • Posterior displacement with external rotation block
  • Failed closed reduction of fracture-dislocation
  • Open fracture

Relative Indications:

  • Displacement 3-5mm in overhead athletes or laborers
  • Associated surgical neck fracture requiring fixation
  • Young, active patient with any displacement

Factors Favoring Surgery:

  • Younger age
  • Higher activity demands
  • Overhead work or sport
  • Posterior displacement pattern
  • Larger fragment size

Lower threshold for surgery in young active patients and overhead athletes.

Screw Fixation:

  • Best for large fragments with good bone quality
  • 4.0mm cannulated screws common
  • Washer may help prevent pull-through
  • Can be done open or arthroscopic-assisted

Suture Anchor Fixation:

  • Ideal for osteoporotic bone
  • Good for smaller or comminuted fragments
  • Uses rotator cuff tissue for fixation
  • Often combined with cuff repair

Tension Band Technique:

  • Uses suture through rotator cuff
  • Passed through bone tunnels
  • Converts tension to compression
  • Good for avulsion-type fractures

Plate Fixation:

  • Reserved for larger fragments
  • Used when combined with surgical neck fracture
  • Low-profile locking plates available

Fixation method should match fragment size, bone quality, and fracture pattern.

Displacement Thresholds

Standard Patient:

  • Under 5mm: Non-operative
  • Over 5mm: Surgical fixation

Overhead Athlete/Laborer:

  • Under 3mm: Non-operative
  • Over 3mm: Consider surgery

Elderly/Low Demand:

  • May accept greater displacement
  • Consider comorbidities
  • Functional goals important

Post-Dislocation Protocol

After Glenohumeral Reduction:

  • Repeat imaging (AP, axillary essential)
  • Measure persistent displacement
  • Fragment often reduces with head

If Fragment Reduces:

  • Non-operative treatment
  • Early motion important
  • Watch for instability

If Fragment Remains Displaced:

  • Apply standard criteria
  • Surgical fixation likely needed
  • Consider associated instability repair

Surgical Technique

Operative Approaches

Indications:

  • Isolated greater tuberosity fracture
  • Most common approach used

Technique:

  • Beach chair or lateral decubitus position
  • Incision from anterolateral acromion edge
  • Split deltoid in line with fibers
  • Stay within 5cm of acromion (axillary nerve)
  • Identify fracture fragment and cuff

Advantages:

  • Direct access to fragment
  • Minimizes soft tissue stripping
  • Can extend if needed

Risks:

  • Axillary nerve injury (stay proximal)
  • Deltoid origin damage

Deltoid-splitting provides excellent access while protecting axillary nerve.

Indications:

  • Combined with surgical neck fracture
  • Associated instability repair needed
  • Extensile exposure required

Technique:

  • Beach chair position
  • Incision from coracoid to deltoid insertion
  • Internervous plane (deltoid/pectoralis)
  • Identify cephalic vein (retract laterally)
  • Develop interval to expose fracture

Advantages:

  • Familiar approach
  • Extensile
  • Can address multiple pathology

Considerations:

  • More lateral retraction needed for GT
  • May need partial subscapularis release

Deltopectoral preferred when extensile exposure or instability repair needed.

Indications:

  • Selected cases with adequate fragment
  • Surgeon experience with technique
  • Combined with labral repair

Technique:

  • Beach chair or lateral position
  • Standard posterior and anterior portals
  • Lateral portal for instrumentation
  • Reduce fragment under visualization
  • Percutaneous screw or anchor fixation

Advantages:

  • Minimally invasive
  • Allows diagnostic arthroscopy
  • Can address associated pathology

Limitations:

  • Technically demanding
  • Fragment manipulation difficult
  • Learning curve significant

Arthroscopic fixation requires advanced skills but treats intra-articular pathology.

Exam Pearl

The axillary nerve emerges approximately 5-7cm distal to the lateral edge of the acromion. The deltoid-splitting approach must stay within 5cm of the acromion to avoid nerve injury.

Fixation Techniques

Technique:

  • Reduce fragment anatomically
  • Provisional K-wire fixation
  • Cannulated screw over wire
  • Washer if poor bone quality
  • Typically 2 screws for rotation control

Pearls:

  • Aim screws toward medial calcar
  • Lag technique if bone allows
  • Avoid proud screw head (impingement)
  • Bury head below cortical surface

Two screws provide rotational stability and prevent toggle.

Technique:

  • Place anchors in anatomic footprint
  • Pass sutures through rotator cuff
  • Reduce fragment with traction
  • Tie sutures over fragment
  • Mattress or simple configuration

Pearls:

  • Anchor placement in medial cortex
  • Use cuff tissue for purchase
  • Consider augmentation with trans-osseous sutures
  • Multiple anchors improve fixation

Suture anchor fixation is ideal for osteoporotic bone and smaller fragments.

Technique:

  • Heavy non-absorbable suture
  • Pass through rotator cuff tendons
  • Create bone tunnels in shaft
  • Tie over bridge of bone
  • Converts distraction to compression

Advantages:

  • Good for avulsion-type fractures
  • Works with osteoporotic bone
  • Low implant profile
  • Cost effective

Tension band provides stable fixation through biomechanical advantage.

Complications

Potential Complications

Incidence: Most common complication of non-operative treatment with displacement

Types:

  • Superior malunion: Subacromial impingement
  • Posterior malunion: External rotation block
  • Combined: Both impingement and rotation loss

Symptoms:

  • Pain with overhead activities
  • Weakness of external rotation
  • Catching and clicking
  • Night pain

Management:

  • Osteotomy and repositioning
  • Arthroscopic subacromial decompression (mild cases)
  • May require reverse shoulder arthroplasty in severe cases

Malunion is the primary reason to treat displaced fractures surgically.

Risk Factors:

  • Large fragment displacement
  • Poor blood supply
  • Osteoporosis
  • Inadequate immobilization

Incidence: Rare with appropriate treatment

Presentation:

  • Persistent pain
  • Weakness
  • Motion at fracture site

Treatment:

  • Revision fixation with bone graft
  • Rotator cuff repair if needed
  • Consider arthroplasty if severe

Non-union is uncommon but may require revision fixation with bone grafting.

Stiffness:

  • Most common complication overall
  • Risk increased with prolonged immobilization
  • Aggressive early motion prevents
  • May require manipulation or release

Avascular Necrosis:

  • Rare with isolated GT fractures
  • Risk increases with combined patterns
  • Monitor with serial radiographs

Hardware Prominence:

  • Screw heads may cause impingement
  • May require removal after healing
  • Avoid proud hardware at surgery

Rotator Cuff Failure:

  • May occur with anchor fixation
  • Related to poor cuff tissue quality
  • May require revision repair

Early motion protocols help prevent stiffness while protecting repair.

Malunion of greater tuberosity fractures with superior displacement causes painful subacromial impingement that may require osteotomy to correct. This reinforces the importance of achieving anatomic reduction in displaced fractures.

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation Protocol

Goals:

  • Protect fixation
  • Control pain and swelling
  • Maintain passive ROM

Week 0-2:

  • Sling immobilization
  • Pendulum exercises only
  • Ice and analgesia
  • Elbow/wrist/hand motion

Week 2-6:

  • Passive forward flexion
  • Passive external rotation (to neutral)
  • No active abduction
  • No active external rotation

Precautions:

  • No lifting
  • Sleep in sling or recliner
  • Avoid reaching behind back

Protection phase focuses on healing while maintaining passive mobility.

Goals:

  • Restore full passive ROM
  • Begin active-assisted motion
  • Progress to active ROM

Week 6-8:

  • Active-assisted forward flexion
  • Active-assisted external rotation
  • Isometric rotator cuff exercises
  • Scapular stabilization exercises

Week 8-12:

  • Active ROM all planes
  • Light resistance exercises
  • Proprioceptive training
  • Discontinue sling (if healing confirmed)

Milestones:

  • Full passive ROM by week 8
  • Active elevation to 140° by week 12

Motion phase progressively restores active shoulder function.

Goals:

  • Restore strength
  • Return to activities
  • Sport-specific training

Week 12-16:

  • Progressive resistance exercises
  • Rotator cuff strengthening
  • Closed chain exercises
  • Swimming (if ROM adequate)

Week 16-24:

  • Sport-specific training
  • Overhead activities (if applicable)
  • Return to work progression
  • Impact activities (based on healing)

Return to Sport:

  • Full ROM and symmetric strength
  • Pain-free function
  • Sport-specific assessment
  • Typically 4-6 months post-operative

Strengthening phase restores full function and prepares for activity return.

Outcomes

Expected Results

Minimally Displaced Fractures:

  • Union rate over 95%
  • Good to excellent outcomes: 85-90%
  • Return to pre-injury function: 80-85%

Functional Outcomes:

  • Mean Constant score: 85-90
  • Mean ASES score: 85-90
  • Return to sport: 85%

Time to Recovery:

  • Pain resolution: 6-8 weeks
  • ROM recovery: 8-12 weeks
  • Strength recovery: 12-16 weeks
  • Full activity: 3-4 months

Non-operative treatment yields excellent results in appropriately selected patients.

Displaced Fractures:

  • Union rate over 95% with adequate fixation
  • Good to excellent outcomes: 85-95%
  • Return to pre-injury function: 80-90%

Functional Outcomes:

  • Mean Constant score: 80-90
  • Mean ASES score: 85-92
  • Return to sport: 80-85%

Complications:

  • Stiffness: 5-10%
  • Hardware removal: 10-15%
  • Revision surgery under 5%

Time to Recovery:

  • Union: 8-12 weeks
  • Full ROM: 12-16 weeks
  • Full activity: 4-6 months

Surgical fixation reliably restores anatomy and function in displaced fractures.

Favorable Factors:

  • Younger age
  • Good bone quality
  • Anatomic reduction achieved
  • Early surgery (within 2 weeks)
  • Compliant with rehabilitation

Unfavorable Factors:

  • Older age
  • Osteoporosis
  • Delay in treatment over 3 weeks
  • Associated rotator cuff tear
  • Comminuted fracture pattern
  • Posterior displacement

Patient factors and fracture characteristics both influence final outcome.

Evidence Base

Key Studies

Platzer et al. - Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fractures

III
Platzer P, et al. • Journal of Trauma (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 135 patients with GT fractures
  • Displacement over 5mm associated with worse outcomes
  • Non-operative treatment with over 5mm: 40% unsatisfactory results
Clinical Implication: Establishes the widely accepted 5mm displacement threshold for surgical intervention vs non-operative management.

Park et al. - Arthroscopic vs Open Fixation

III
Park TS, et al. • Arthroscopy (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Compared arthroscopic and open fixation techniques
  • Similar functional outcomes between groups
  • Arthroscopic group had less blood loss and shorter incision
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic treatment is a valid option with comparable outcomes to open surgery in experienced hands, offering cosmetic and soft tissue advantages.

George et al. - Fracture-Dislocations

IV
George MS • JSES (2007)
Key Findings:
  • Review of GT fractures associated with anterior dislocations
  • 15-30% of anterior dislocations have associated GT fracture
  • Most fractures reduce with glenohumeral reduction
Clinical Implication: GT fractures with dislocation often reduce; surgery is only indicated if displacement persists greater than 5mm post-reduction.

Bono et al. - Surgical Treatment Review

V
Bono CM, et al. • JBJS Am (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Comprehensive review of surgical techniques
  • Screw fixation preferred for large fragments with good bone
  • Suture anchor fixation for osteoporotic bone or comminution
Clinical Implication: Choose fixation based on bone quality: Screws for good bone/large fragments, Suture Anchors for osteoporotic bone/comminution.

Green and Izzi - Classification and Treatment

V
Green A, Izzi J • JAAOS (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Proposed treatment algorithm based on displacement
  • Recommended 3mm threshold for high-demand patients
  • Emphasized posterior displacement as surgical indication
Clinical Implication: Consider a lower threshold (3mm) for surgery in high-demand overhead athletes or laborers.

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old rugby player sustains an anterior shoulder dislocation during a tackle. After closed reduction, X-rays show a greater tuberosity fracture with 8mm of superior displacement. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Initial Assessment:** - Confirm reduction on post-reduction films (AP, axillary views essential) - Document neurovascular status, specifically axillary nerve function - Assess for associated injuries: Bankart lesion, Hill-Sachs defect, rotator cuff - CT scan for surgical planning - assess fragment size and displacement **Management Decision:** This patient requires surgical fixation based on: - Displacement exceeds 5mm (8mm present) - Young, active patient (rugby player) - High functional demands requiring full shoulder function - Some advocate 3mm threshold for overhead athletes **Surgical Plan:** - Timing: Within 2 weeks ideally - Approach: Deltoid-splitting (direct access to GT) - Fixation: Screw fixation (likely good bone quality at this age) - Alternative: Consider deltopectoral if instability repair needed **Rehabilitation:** - Sling for 6 weeks with passive ROM from week 2 - Active motion from 6 weeks when healing confirmed - Strengthening from 12 weeks - Return to contact sport: 4-6 months minimum **Outcome:** With appropriate surgical treatment, expect 85-90% good to excellent outcomes. Main risks include stiffness and potential instability. May require later instability surgery if recurrent dislocations.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
8mm displacement greater than 5mm threshold = Surgery
Young athlete demands better anatomic reduction
CT helpful for planning fixation type
Monitor axillary nerve pre/post reduction
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting displacement greater than 5mm in young athlete
✗Missing associated Bankart lesion
✗Ignoring nerve status
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if displacement was 3mm?"
"How does deltoid split affect rehab?"
"Risks of non-op treatment here?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"An 82-year-old woman with osteoporosis falls and sustains a greater tuberosity fracture with 7mm of posterior displacement. Her pre-injury Constant score was 70 and she lives independently. What is your approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Assessment Considerations:** - Pre-injury function: Constant score 70 suggests moderate baseline - Independent living indicates need for functional upper limb - Osteoporosis affects fixation options and healing - Need full medical assessment including cardiac, respiratory status **Management Options:** **Option 1 - Non-Operative:** - Sling immobilization with early passive ROM - Accept some malunion in low-demand elderly patient - Avoid surgical risks in osteoporotic elderly patient **Option 2 - Surgical Fixation:** - Indicated given posterior displacement (limits ER function) - Use suture anchor fixation (better in osteoporotic bone) - Consider augmentation with heavy sutures through cuff **My Recommendation:** Given the posterior displacement (functionally significant) and her independence, I would lean toward surgical fixation with suture anchors if medically fit. However, non-operative treatment is reasonable if she accepts potential functional limitation. This requires shared decision-making with the patient.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Posterior displacement blocks external rotation
Osteoporosis makes screw fixation difficult
Non-op is valid if comorbidities high
Suture anchors better for osteoporotic bone
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using screws in osteoporotic bone (pullout)
✗Forcing surgery in medically unwell patient
✗Ignoring functional baseline
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Technique for osteoporotic bone?"
"Rehab differences in elderly?"
"When to use reverse shoulder arthroplasty?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"At 3 months post-operative following screw fixation of a displaced greater tuberosity fracture, your patient has persistent pain and inability to elevate the arm above 90 degrees. The fracture is united on X-ray. What is your differential and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Differential Diagnosis:** 1. **Malunion with impingement:** Fragment healed non-anatomically 2. **Stiffness/Adhesive capsulitis:** Most common complication 3. **Hardware prominence:** Proud screw causing impingement 4. **Rotator cuff failure:** Secondary tear or suture failure 5. **Associated undiagnosed pathology:** Labral tear, biceps pathology **Investigation:** - Clinical examination: ROM (passive vs active), strength testing, impingement signs - X-rays: AP, axillary, scapular Y - assess position and hardware - CT: If concerned about malunion - MRI: Evaluate rotator cuff integrity - Diagnostic injection: Subacromial lidocaine for impingement **Management by Diagnosis:** - **Stiffness:** Intensive physiotherapy, manipulation under anesthesia, arthroscopic release - **Hardware prominence:** Hardware removal, subacromial decompression - **Malunion:** Osteotomy and refixation or decompression - **Cuff failure:** Revision cuff repair if repairable
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Stiffness is most common complication
Malunion causes impingement/block
Hardware can be symptomatic
Workup: Xray to CT to MRI to Injection
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming it's just 'frozen shoulder'
✗Ignoring malunion possibility
✗Not checking cuff integrity
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How to treat malunion?"
"When to remove hardware?"
"Role of arthroscopy?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Describe the surgical approach and fixation technique you would use for a displaced greater tuberosity fracture in a 45-year-old patient with good bone quality."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
**Pre-operative Planning:** - Review CT scan for fragment size and displacement direction - Assess bone quality (good in this case) - Plan fixation: Screw fixation preferred for large fragment with good bone - Consent: Risk of axillary nerve injury, stiffness, hardware removal **Positioning and Setup:** - Beach chair position - Arm draped free for manipulation - Fluoroscopy available - Have suture anchors available as backup **Surgical Approach - Deltoid-Splitting:** - Incision from anterolateral acromion, extending 5cm distally - Split deltoid in line with fibers - CRITICAL: Stay within 5cm of acromion to protect axillary nerve - Place stay sutures in deltoid split to prevent propagation - Identify subacromial bursa and rotator cuff **Fracture Reduction and Fixation:** - Identify fracture fragment attached to rotator cuff - Remove hematoma and debris from fracture bed - Reduce fragment anatomically using traction on cuff tendons - Provisional K-wire fixation (check reduction with fluoroscopy) - Place 2x 4.0mm cannulated partially threaded screws - Aim screws toward medial calcar for best purchase - Ensure screw heads below cortical surface (avoid impingement) **Closure and Post-operative:** - Repair deltoid split with absorbable sutures - Layered closure, sling application - Check X-rays day 1 - Passive ROM from week 2
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Deltoid splitting approach less than 5cm
Screw fixation for good bone
Medial calcar aim
Bury screw heads
COMMON TRAPS
✗Extending split greater than 5cm (Axillary nerve)
✗Poor reduction leading to impingement
✗Proud screw heads
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if bone is poor?"
"What if you can't reduce it?"
"Post-op rehab timeline?"

MCQ Practice

Self-Assessment Questions

Q1: Surgical Decision Making

Q: A 35-year-old tennis player sustains a greater tuberosity fracture with 4mm of superior displacement. Which factor would most influence your decision toward surgical management?

  • A) Patient age
  • B) Occupation as an overhead athlete
  • C) Superior direction of displacement
  • D) Fragment size
  • E) Time from injury

A: B - The patient's occupation as an overhead athlete with high functional demands is the key factor. While the standard threshold is 5mm, many surgeons advocate 3mm threshold for overhead athletes requiring full shoulder function.

Q2: Anatomy

Q: Which rotator cuff tendon does NOT attach to the greater tuberosity?

  • A) Supraspinatus
  • B) Infraspinatus
  • C) Teres minor
  • D) Subscapularis
  • E) All attach to the greater tuberosity

A: D - The subscapularis attaches to the lesser tuberosity, not the greater tuberosity. The three rotator cuff tendons that attach to GT are supraspinatus (superior), infraspinatus (middle), and teres minor (inferior facet).

Q3: Imaging

Q: What is the most important radiographic view for assessing displacement of a greater tuberosity fracture?

  • A) True AP (Grashey) view
  • B) Scapular Y view
  • C) Axillary view
  • D) Internal rotation AP view
  • E) External rotation AP view

A: C - The axillary view best shows posterior displacement of the GT fragment (the "crescent sign"). Posterior displacement is often the most functionally significant and may be missed on AP views.

Q4: Surgical Approach

Q: When performing a deltoid-splitting approach, how far distal to the acromion must the surgeon stay to avoid axillary nerve injury?

  • A) 2cm
  • B) 3cm
  • C) 5cm
  • D) 7cm
  • E) 10cm

A: C - The deltoid split must stay within 5cm of the acromion to avoid injury to the axillary nerve, which courses around the surgical neck 5-7cm distal to the lateral acromion.

Q5: Complications

Q: What is the most common complication following treatment of greater tuberosity fractures?

  • A) Non-union
  • B) Avascular necrosis
  • C) Stiffness
  • D) Infection
  • E) Hardware failure

A: C - Stiffness is the most common complication following both operative and non-operative treatment of GT fractures. This emphasizes the importance of early motion protocols.

Australian Context

Australian Context

Greater tuberosity fractures in Australian practice follow international evidence-based guidelines with specific local considerations for patient populations and healthcare delivery.

The Australian population presents with greater tuberosity fractures in the typical bimodal distribution - young males with high-energy sporting or workplace injuries, and elderly females with low-energy falls often associated with osteoporosis. The significant participation in contact sports such as rugby league, rugby union, and Australian rules football contributes to the younger cohort. Falls prevention programs supported by Australian health departments are important for reducing the elderly fracture burden.

Australian orthopaedic training through the AOA provides comprehensive exposure to shoulder trauma management. The public hospital system allows timely surgical intervention for displaced fractures, while private practice provides additional options for early surgery in appropriate cases. Both settings achieve outcomes comparable to international standards when appropriate indications and techniques are followed.

Rehabilitation services through the public hospital physiotherapy departments and private practitioners support structured post-operative recovery. WorkCover and third-party insurers provide coverage for work-related and motor vehicle accident injuries respectively, facilitating comprehensive rehabilitation programs. Return to work assessments and graduated return to activity programs are well-established within the Australian compensation framework.

Imaging services including plain radiography and CT scanning are widely available throughout metropolitan and regional Australia. MRI access may be more limited in some regional areas, though this is rarely urgently required for acute greater tuberosity fractures. Telehealth and image transfer capabilities support regional management with metropolitan specialist input when needed.

Greater Tuberosity Fractures - Exam Quick Reference

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Facts

  • •Displacement threshold: 5mm standard, 3mm for overhead athletes
  • •Three cuff attachments: Supraspinatus (superior), Infraspinatus (middle), Teres minor (inferior)
  • •Posterior displacement worst - limits external rotation
  • •Superior displacement causes impingement
  • •15-30% of anterior dislocations have associated GT fracture
  • •Axillary view shows posterior displacement (crescent sign)
  • •Deltoid split must stay within 5cm of acromion (axillary nerve)
  • •Screw fixation for large fragments with good bone
  • •Suture anchors for osteoporotic bone or comminution

Surgical Steps

  • •Beach chair position, arm draped free
  • •Deltoid-splitting approach from anterolateral acromion
  • •Split deltoid in line with fibers, stay within 5cm of acromion
  • •Identify fracture and rotator cuff attachment
  • •Reduce fragment anatomically
  • •Provisional K-wire fixation
  • •Place 2 cannulated screws toward medial calcar
  • •Bury screw heads below cortical surface
  • •Check fixation with fluoroscopy

Common Pitfalls

  • •Missing posterior displacement on AP views alone
  • •Treating displaced fractures non-operatively in active patients
  • •Extending deltoid split beyond 5cm (axillary nerve)
  • •Proud hardware causing impingement
  • •Prolonged immobilization causing stiffness
  • •Missing associated instability in fracture-dislocations
  • •Using screw fixation in osteoporotic bone

Examiner Favorites

  • •Describe rotator cuff attachments to greater tuberosity
  • •What is the surgical threshold for displacement?
  • •Why is posterior displacement worse than superior?
  • •What approach would you use and why?
  • •How do you protect the axillary nerve?
  • •How would you fix a GT fracture in osteoporotic bone?
  • •Management of GT fracture with anterior dislocation
Quick Stats
Reading Time112 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures