Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Growth Factors in Bone Healing

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Growth Factors in Bone Healing

Comprehensive guide to growth factors regulating bone healing, BMP family, VEGF, TGF-β, PDGF, FGF, IGF roles, clinical applications, and therapeutic controversies for basic science viva preparation

complete
Updated: 2024-12-25
High Yield Overview

GROWTH FACTORS IN BONE HEALING

BMP Osteoinduction | VEGF Angiogenesis | TGF-β Regulation | Clinical rhBMP Applications

BMP-2/7Most potent osteoinductive factors
rhBMP-2FDA-approved for spinal fusion and tibia nonunion
VEGFEssential for vascular invasion and endochondral ossification
TGF-βMost abundant in bone matrix, regulates coupling

GROWTH FACTOR FAMILIES

BMP Family
PatternBone morphogenetic proteins
TreatmentOsteoinduction, Smad1/5/8 signaling
TGF-β Superfamily
PatternTransforming growth factors
TreatmentProliferation, coupling, Smad2/3
VEGF
PatternVascular endothelial growth factor
TreatmentAngiogenesis, Type H vessels
FGF Family
PatternFibroblast growth factors
TreatmentMesenchymal proliferation
PDGF
PatternPlatelet-derived growth factor
TreatmentChemotaxis, early healing
IGF Family
PatternInsulin-like growth factors
TreatmentOsteoblast proliferation, GH axis

Critical Must-Knows

  • BMPs are the only growth factors that induce ectopic bone (true osteoinduction)
  • BMP-2 and BMP-7 signal via Smad1/5/8 to activate Runx2, the master osteoblast regulator
  • VEGF couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis - no vessels means no bone formation
  • TGF-β is most abundant in bone matrix, released during resorption for coupling
  • rhBMP-2 FDA-approved for ALIF L4-S1 and open tibia, serious complications off-label

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    BMPs induce ectopic bone in muscle (Urist 1965 discovery)
  • "
    VEGF secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes initiates vascular invasion
  • "
    TGF-β biphasic: promotes proliferation, inhibits terminal differentiation
  • "
    Fracture hematoma platelets release PDGF and TGF-β (initiates cascade)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Local expression of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) duringfracture healing is shown in the control (A) and diabetes(B) groups after 1 week of healing, 2 weeks of healing(C) and (D), 3 weeks of
Click to expand
Local expression of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) duringfracture healing is shown in the control (A) and diabetes(B) groups after 1 week of hCredit: Xu MT et al. via Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Local expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) during fracturehealing is shown in the control (A) and diabetes(B) groups after 1 week of healing, 2 weeks of healing(C) and (D), 3 weeks of he
Click to expand
Local expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) during fracturehealing is shown in the control (A) and diabetes(B) groups after 1 week of heaCredit: Xu MT et al. via Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Three-dimensional micro-CT images of bone defect area where the scaffolds were implanted, showing improved regeneration when BMP2 was delivered from the scaffold (A–C). Long-term S. aureus growth inhi
Click to expand
Three-dimensional micro-CT images of bone defect area where the scaffolds were implanted, showing improved regeneration when BMP2 was delivered from tCredit: Abou Neel EA et al. via Int J Nanomedicine via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Tibial fracture production method. (A) Manual three-point bending fracture technique. (B) An incision (4 mm) and dissection of fracture site was performed, followed by (C) introduction of a hypodermic
Click to expand
Tibial fracture production method. (A) Manual three-point bending fracture technique. (B) An incision (4 mm) and dissection of fracture site was perfoCredit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Growth Factor Exam Points

BMP Osteoinduction

BMPs are unique - only growth factors that induce ectopic bone when implanted in muscle. BMP-2 and BMP-7 signal via Smad1/5/8 to activate Runx2. rhBMP-2 is FDA-approved for ALIF L4-S1 and open tibia fractures but has serious complications.

rhBMP-2 Complications

Recombinant BMP-2 has serious risks: ectopic bone, osteolysis, heterotopic ossification, inflammatory swelling. Off-label cervical spine use caused life-threatening airway compromise. FDA warning against cervical use.

VEGF and Angiogenesis

VEGF is essential for bone healing. Couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis via Type H vessels. Secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes to initiate vascular invasion. Without VEGF, cartilage callus cannot be replaced by bone.

TGF-β Paradox

TGF-β has biphasic effects: promotes MSC proliferation but inhibits terminal differentiation. Most abundant growth factor in bone matrix. Released during resorption to recruit osteoprogenitors for coupling.

At a Glance

Growth factors orchestrate bone healing through coordinated signaling cascades. BMPs (Bone Morphogenetic Proteins) are the only factors that induce ectopic bone in muscle—true osteoinduction. BMP-2/7 signal via Smad1/5/8 to activate Runx2, the master osteoblast transcription factor. rhBMP-2 is FDA-approved for ALIF L4-S1 and open tibia fractures but has serious complications (ectopic bone, osteolysis, airway swelling) especially off-label in cervical spine. VEGF couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis—secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes to initiate vascular invasion; no vessels means no bone. TGF-β is most abundant in bone matrix and released during resorption for coupling. PDGF and TGF-β from platelet-rich haematoma initiate the healing cascade.

Mnemonic

BMPBMP - Bone Morphogenetic Protein

B
Bone induction in ectopic sites
Only growth factor that induces bone in muscle
M
Most potent osteoinductive
BMP-2 and BMP-7 most potent clinically
P
Phosphorylates Smad1/5/8
Signaling pathway to activate Runx2

Memory Hook:BMP makes Bone in Muscle Pouches (ectopic bone formation)

Mnemonic

VEGFVEGF - Vascular Coupling

V
Vascular invasion essential
Initiates blood vessel growth into callus
E
Endochondral ossification
Secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes
G
Growth of Type H vessels
CD31-high Emcn-high vessels for osteogenesis
F
Fracture healing requires it
Without VEGF no bone formation possible

Memory Hook:VEGF = Vessels Enable Growth for Fracture healing

Mnemonic

GROWTHGROWTH - Key Growth Factors

G
GH/IGF axis for osteoblasts
Growth hormone stimulates IGF-1 production
R
Runx2 activated by BMPs
BMP → Smad1/5/8 → Runx2 pathway
O
Osteoinduction (BMPs only)
True ectopic bone formation unique to BMPs
W
Wnt synergy with BMPs
Synergistic for osteoblast differentiation
T
TGF-β abundant in matrix
Released during resorption for coupling
H
Hematoma has PDGF/TGF-β
Platelets initiate healing cascade

Memory Hook:GROWTH factors orchestrate bone healing in coordinated sequence

Mnemonic

SMADSMAD - BMP Signaling Pathway

S
Serine phosphorylation
BMPR phosphorylates Smad C-terminus
M
Mothers against decapentaplegic
Drosophila gene, origin of name
A
Activates Runx2 transcription
Smad complex activates osteoblast genes
D
Downstream of BMP receptor
Intracellular signaling molecules

Memory Hook:SMAD pathway: BMP receptor phosphorylates Smad1/5/8 which activates Runx2

Overview and Introduction

Growth factors are signaling proteins that regulate cellular proliferation, differentiation, migration, and matrix synthesis during bone healing. They orchestrate the complex cascade of fracture repair through sequential expression and coordinated cellular responses.

Why growth factors matter clinically:

Understanding growth factor biology is essential for:

  • Comprehending fracture healing mechanisms at molecular level
  • Using rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 safely and effectively
  • Developing novel bone healing therapies
  • Explaining why certain conditions impair healing (diabetes, smoking, NSAIDs)
  • Rational use of biologics (PRP, bone marrow aspirate, growth factor products)

Historical Context: Urist Discovery

Marshall Urist (1965) discovered bone morphogenetic proteins by demonstrating that demineralized bone matrix (DBM) implanted into muscle induced ectopic bone formation. This proved the existence of osteoinductive factors within bone matrix, leading to decades of work to isolate and clone BMPs. rhBMP-2 was FDA-approved in 2002 after extensive development.

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs)

BMP Family Overview

Bone morphogenetic proteins are members of the TGF-β superfamily and are the most potent osteoinductive growth factors known.

Key characteristics:

  • Over 20 BMP family members identified
  • BMP-2, BMP-4, BMP-6, BMP-7 have strong osteoinductive activity
  • BMP-2 and BMP-7 are most clinically relevant
  • Only growth factors that induce ectopic bone formation (true osteoinduction)
  • Signal via Smad1/5/8 pathway to activate Runx2

Sources in bone healing:

  • Produced by osteoblasts and osteoprogenitor cells
  • Stored in bone matrix (released during resorption)
  • Platelets contain small amounts
  • Peak expression at week 2-3 post-fracture (days 14-21)

Ectopic Bone Formation

BMPs are unique because they can induce bone formation in non-skeletal sites (muscle, subcutaneous tissue). This is true osteoinduction - other growth factors can enhance bone formation but cannot initiate it de novo in soft tissue. This property was the basis of Urist's original discovery.

BMPs are essential for both fracture healing and skeletal development.

BMP Signaling Pathway (Smad Pathway)

BMP signal transduction follows the canonical Smad pathway:

BMP Signaling Cascade

Receptor ActivationStep 1: Ligand Binding

BMP-2 or BMP-7 binds to type II BMP receptor (BMPR-II) on cell surface. Type II receptor is a constitutively active serine/threonine kinase.

Type I RecruitmentStep 2: Receptor Complex

BMPR-II recruits type I receptor (BMPR-IA or BMPR-IB, also called ALK-3 or ALK-6). Type II receptor phosphorylates and activates type I receptor.

R-Smad ActivationStep 3: Smad Phosphorylation

Activated BMPR-I phosphorylates Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 (R-Smads for receptor-regulated Smads) at C-terminal serine residues. This is specific to BMP pathway.

Nuclear TranslocationStep 4: Complex Formation

Phosphorylated Smad1/5/8 bind to Smad4 (Co-Smad or common Smad) forming heteromeric complex. Complex translocates to nucleus.

Gene ActivationStep 5: Transcription

Smad complex activates transcription of osteoblast genes including Runx2 (master regulator), osterix, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein.

Inhibitors of BMP signaling:

  • Noggin: Binds BMPs extracellularly, prevents receptor binding
  • Chordin: Similar to noggin, BMP antagonist, important in development
  • Smad6 and Smad7: Inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) that block R-Smad phosphorylation
  • Smurf1/2: E3 ubiquitin ligases that degrade Smads and receptors

Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)

FOP is caused by gain-of-function mutation in ACVR1 (ALK-2, a type I BMP receptor). Mutant receptor is constitutively active, causing progressive heterotopic ossification in muscle, tendons, and ligaments. Trauma or surgery triggers devastating flares of bone formation. No cure exists - surgical excision causes more heterotopic bone. Management is supportive only.

The Smad pathway is the canonical BMP signaling mechanism for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.

Clinical Use of Recombinant BMPs

FDA-approved indications:

ProductFDA IndicationsDelivery SystemTypical Dose
rhBMP-2 (Infuse)1. ALIF single level L4-S1; 2. Open tibia fractures (Gustilo IIIA/B)Absorbable collagen sponge (ACS)12 mg total for ALIF (1.5 mg/mL)
rhBMP-7 (OP-1)Recalcitrant long bone nonunions (Humanitarian Device Exemption)Bovine collagen putty3.5 mg per implant (limited availability)

Mechanism of action:

  • BMP bound to collagen carrier placed at fracture/fusion site
  • Local sustained release over weeks
  • Induces mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to osteoblasts
  • Stimulates bone formation without need for autograft
  • Overcomes poor osteogenic potential of graft site

Advantages over bone graft:

  • No donor site morbidity (iliac crest pain 10-20%, infection, hematoma)
  • Unlimited supply (not limited by patient bone stock)
  • Consistent osteoinductive potential (autograft quality variable by age, comorbidities)
  • Avoids second surgical site (reduces operative time, patient preference)

rhBMP-2 Serious Complications

Serious complications reported with rhBMP-2:

  • Ectopic bone formation (heterotopic ossification outside intended fusion site)
  • Retrograde ejaculation (2-5% in ALIF, from nerve plexus inflammation)
  • Osteolysis and radiolucencies around implant (paradoxical bone resorption)
  • Inflammatory complications (soft tissue swelling, seroma formation, wound issues)
  • Airway compromise in cervical spine (FDA warning 2008 against off-label cervical use)
  • Possible increased cancer risk (controversial, disputed by independent analyses)

Off-label use is controversial - particularly in cervical spine where life-threatening airway swelling has occurred from prevertebral soft tissue edema.

Evidence base:

  • BESTT trial (2002): rhBMP-2 superior to autograft for open tibia fractures, reduced infection
  • Spine trials: Non-inferior to autograft for ALIF with less donor site pain
  • Meta-analyses: Increased fusion rates (5-10% higher) but also increased complications
  • Dose-dependent effects: Higher doses increase both efficacy and complications

rhBMP-2 is highly effective but requires careful patient selection, dose consideration, and informed consent about risks.

Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β)

TGF-β Superfamily

TGF-β is the most abundant growth factor in bone matrix and a key regulator of bone remodeling and fracture healing.

Three isoforms in mammals:

  • TGF-β1 (most abundant in bone, main regulator)
  • TGF-β2 (development, wound healing)
  • TGF-β3 (anti-scarring properties)

Sources in bone:

  • Platelets (released during clotting in fracture hematoma, initiates healing)
  • Bone matrix (released during osteoclastic resorption, coupling mechanism)
  • Osteoblasts and inflammatory cells actively produce TGF-β
  • Most abundant growth factor stored in bone matrix

Secretion and activation:

  • Secreted as latent complex (inactive, bound to latency-associated peptide, LAP)
  • Activation by proteases (plasmin, matrix metalloproteinases), acidic pH, or mechanical stress
  • Active TGF-β binds type II TGF-β receptor (TβR-II)
  • Activation is tightly regulated to control local effects

TGF-β has complex, context-dependent effects on bone cells at different stages.

Effects on Bone Cells (Biphasic)

Biphasic effects on osteoblasts:

StageEffect on OsteoblastsMechanismBiological Outcome
Early (proliferation)Stimulates proliferationIncreases cell number via mitogenic signalsExpands osteoprogenitor pool before differentiation
Late (differentiation)Inhibits differentiationSuppresses Runx2 and osteocalcin expressionPrevents premature maturation, maintains progenitors

This biphasic pattern is critical: TGF-β first expands the progenitor pool (more cells available), then must be downregulated to allow terminal differentiation. Persistent high TGF-β blocks bone formation despite abundant progenitors.

Effects on other cell types:

  • Mesenchymal stem cells: Chemotactic (recruits cells to healing site via gradient)
  • Osteoclasts: Indirect effect via regulating osteoblast production of RANKL and OPG
  • Chondrocytes: Promotes proliferation and cartilage matrix synthesis (soft callus)
  • Fibroblasts: Stimulates collagen synthesis (can lead to fibrosis if excessive)

Coupling Mechanism

TGF-β mediates coupling of bone resorption to formation. During resorption, osteoclasts release TGF-β from bone matrix into the resorption lacuna. This TGF-β acts as a chemotactic signal, recruiting osteoprogenitors to the resorption site. These progenitors then differentiate into osteoblasts to refill the cavity. This is the molecular basis of the remodeling cycle - linking resorption spatially and temporally to formation.

TGF-β coordinates the transition from resorption to formation in coupled bone remodeling.

TGF-β Signaling Pathway (Smad2/3)

Smad2/3 pathway (differs from BMP Smad1/5/8):

  1. TGF-β binds type II receptor (TGFβR-II, constitutive serine/threonine kinase)
  2. Type II recruits and phosphorylates type I receptor (TGFβR-I, also called ALK-5)
  3. Activated type I receptor phosphorylates Smad2 and Smad3 (R-Smads specific to TGF-β)
  4. Smad2/3 bind Smad4 (Co-Smad, common to both TGF-β and BMP pathways)
  5. Complex translocates to nucleus and regulates gene transcription

Key difference from BMP pathway:

  • TGF-β uses Smad2/3 (via ALK-5)
  • BMPs use Smad1/5/8 (via ALK-2/3/6)
  • Both pathways share Smad4 as common mediator
  • This allows differential gene activation despite similar receptor mechanisms

Inhibitors:

  • Smad7: Inhibitory Smad (I-Smad) specific for TGF-β pathway
  • Decorin: Extracellular TGF-β antagonist, binds and sequesters TGF-β
  • Follistatin: Binds activins (TGF-β family), prevents receptor binding

Understanding TGF-β signaling explains its role in coordinating bone remodeling and coupling.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)

VEGF in Bone Healing

VEGF is absolutely essential for bone healing because angiogenesis (blood vessel formation) is coupled to osteogenesis. No vessels means no bone formation.

Key roles in fracture healing:

  • Vascular invasion of cartilage callus during endochondral ossification
  • Coupling angiogenesis to osteogenesis (spatially and temporally)
  • Osteoblast survival (anti-apoptotic effects, prevents cell death)
  • Osteoclast recruitment (via indirect RANKL regulation)
  • Delivery of osteoprogenitors via Type H vessels

Sources in fracture healing:

  • Hypertrophic chondrocytes (highest production, signals vascular invasion of soft callus)
  • Osteoblasts (maintain blood supply to forming bone)
  • Macrophages and inflammatory cells (early and throughout healing)
  • Platelets (released early in hematoma, first wave)

Endochondral Ossification and VEGF

VEGF secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes is the critical signal for vascular invasion during endochondral ossification. Capillaries invade from the periosteum and marrow cavity, bringing osteoprogenitors and osteoclasts. Without VEGF, cartilage callus persists and cannot be replaced by bone. This is why VEGF inhibitors (anti-cancer drugs like bevacizumab) significantly impair fracture healing.

VEGF is the critical molecular link between angiogenesis and osteogenesis in bone healing.

VEGF Receptors and Signaling

VEGF family members:

  • VEGF-A (most important for bone, multiple splice variants: VEGF121, VEGF165, VEGF189)
  • VEGF-B (limited role in bone)
  • VEGF-C, VEGF-D (primarily lymphangiogenesis)
  • PlGF (placental growth factor, synergizes with VEGF-A)

Receptors:

  • VEGFR-1 (Flt-1): Decoy receptor, low signaling activity, sequesters VEGF
  • VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk-1): Primary signaling receptor on endothelial cells, drives angiogenesis
  • VEGFR-3: Primarily lymphatic endothelium

Signaling cascade (VEGFR-2):

  1. VEGF-A binds VEGFR-2 on endothelial cells
  2. Receptor dimerization and autophosphorylation (tyrosine kinase activation)
  3. Activates multiple downstream pathways:
    • PI3K/Akt: Cell survival, migration
    • MAPK: Cell proliferation
    • PLCγ: Calcium signaling, permeability
  4. Results in endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation (angiogenesis)

Regulation of VEGF expression:

  • Hypoxia (low oxygen) is the major stimulus via HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor)
  • BMPs and TGF-β stimulate VEGF production in osteoblasts
  • Inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α) increase VEGF in macrophages
  • Mechanical stress upregulates VEGF in osteocytes

Anti-VEGF Drugs and Fracture Healing

Anti-VEGF cancer therapies (bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib) severely impair fracture healing and bone repair. These drugs block angiogenesis, preventing vascular invasion of the callus. Animal studies show 50% reduction in callus formation and delayed healing. Clinical implication: Consider delaying elective orthopaedic surgery in patients on anti-VEGF medications. Fractures in these patients may heal more slowly and have higher nonunion risk.

VEGF signaling through VEGFR-2 is essential for coupling blood vessel growth to bone formation.

Type H Vessels and Osteogenesis

Type H vessels are a specialized subset of capillaries that couple angiogenesis to osteogenesis.

Characteristics of Type H vessels:

  • High expression of CD31 (PECAM-1) and Endomucin (CD31-high, Emcn-high)
  • Located at metaphysis and in fracture callus
  • Strongly pro-osteogenic environment
  • Deliver osteoprogenitors from circulation and marrow
  • Support perivascular mesenchymal cell differentiation to osteoblasts

Type L vessels (comparison):

  • Low expression of CD31 and Endomucin (CD31-low, Emcn-low)
  • Located in diaphysis (cortical bone)
  • Less osteogenic, primarily nutrient delivery
  • Do not actively support bone formation

Mechanism of coupling:

  1. VEGF and other factors induce Type H vessel sprouting
  2. Type H vessels grow into callus along specific trajectories
  3. Perivascular mesenchymal cells associate with vessels
  4. Local BMP and Wnt signals drive osteoblast differentiation
  5. Bone formation follows vessel network - osteoblasts line up along vessels and deposit osteoid

Spatial Coupling

Bone formation literally follows the path of Type H vessels. Lineage tracing studies show that osteoblasts differentiate from perivascular cells adjacent to Type H vessels. This explains the spatial coupling of angiogenesis to osteogenesis - bone forms where vessels penetrate, not randomly throughout the callus.

Type H vessels are the cellular and molecular mechanism linking blood vessel growth to bone formation.

Other Growth Factors in Bone Healing

Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)

PDGF is the earliest growth factor at the fracture site, released immediately from platelet alpha granules when the fracture hematoma forms.

PDGF isoforms:

  • PDGF-AA: Two A chains, binds PDGFR-α
  • PDGF-BB: Two B chains, most potent, binds both receptors
  • PDGF-AB: Heterodimer
  • PDGF-CC, PDGF-DD: Newer isoforms, less studied

Functions in bone healing:

  • Chemotaxis: Recruits inflammatory cells (neutrophils, macrophages) to fracture
  • MSC recruitment: Attracts mesenchymal stem cells from periosteum, marrow, circulation
  • Mitogenic: Stimulates proliferation of fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, osteoblasts
  • Angiogenesis: Indirect effect via inducing VEGF expression in stromal cells
  • Matrix synthesis: Stimulates collagen and proteoglycan production

Temporal expression:

  • Immediate release from platelets upon fracture (minutes to hours)
  • Peak concentration at 24-48 hours in hematoma
  • Sustained production by macrophages and fibroblasts during inflammation (days 3-7)
  • Declines as inflammation resolves

Signaling pathways:

  • Binds PDGF receptor alpha or beta (receptor tyrosine kinases)
  • Activates Ras-MAPK pathway (cell proliferation)
  • Activates PI3K-Akt pathway (cell survival, migration)
  • Activates PLCγ pathway (calcium signaling, cytoskeletal reorganization for migration)

Fracture Hematoma Role

Fracture hematoma is not just a blood clot - it is a rich reservoir of growth factors. Platelets release PDGF and TGF-β immediately upon aggregation, initiating the inflammatory phase and recruiting the cellular players to the fracture site. This is why excessive irrigation and debridement of hematoma may impair healing - you wash away the growth factors that kick off the healing cascade.

PDGF initiates the early inflammatory and cellular recruitment phases of fracture healing.

Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs)

FGF family comprises over 20 members involved in skeletal development, fracture healing, and homeostasis.

Key FGFs in bone:

  • FGF-2 (basic FGF, bFGF): Most studied in bone healing
  • FGF-18: Cartilage development and homeostasis
  • FGF-23: Phosphate homeostasis (produced by osteocytes, regulates kidney phosphate handling)

FGF-2 (bFGF) effects:

  • Mitogen for osteoprogenitors, chondrocytes, endothelial cells (cell proliferation)
  • Stimulates alkaline phosphatase expression in osteoblasts
  • Enhances angiogenesis (synergizes with VEGF for vessel formation)
  • Modulates BMP signaling (can enhance or inhibit depending on concentration and context)
  • Maintains mesenchymal cell pool (prevents premature terminal differentiation)

Expression in fracture healing:

  • Produced by osteoblasts and chondrocytes during repair phases (weeks 2-8)
  • Sustained low-level expression during remodeling and homeostasis
  • Upregulated by mechanical loading

FGF-18 applications:

  • Critical for growth plate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation
  • Maintains articular cartilage (chondroprotective effects)
  • Sprifermin (recombinant FGF-18) in clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis

FGFR mutations and disease:

  • FGFR3 activating mutations cause achondroplasia (most common skeletal dysplasia, short stature)
  • Mechanism: Overactive FGFR3 inhibits chondrocyte proliferation in growth plate
  • FGFR1/2 mutations cause craniosynostosis syndromes (premature suture fusion)

Achondroplasia and FGFR3

FGFR3 gain-of-function mutations cause achondroplasia (G380R mutation most common). Overactive FGFR3 signaling inhibits chondrocyte proliferation in the growth plate, resulting in shortened long bones and short stature (average adult height 4 feet). This demonstrates the critical role of FGF signaling in skeletal development. Vosoritide (FGFR3 antagonist) is a new treatment to increase growth velocity in children.

FGFs regulate mesenchymal proliferation and maintain progenitor pools during bone healing and development.

Insulin-Like Growth Factors (IGFs) and Other Factors

IGF-1 and IGF-2:

IGF-1 is the primary systemic anabolic factor for bone and cartilage.

IGF-1 functions in bone:

  • Stimulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation
  • Increases type I collagen synthesis (matrix production)
  • Enhances mineralization of osteoid
  • Anti-apoptotic (prolongs osteoblast lifespan, prevents premature death)
  • Mediates many skeletal effects of growth hormone (GH)

Sources of IGF-1:

  • Endocrine: Liver produces IGF-1 in response to GH, circulates bound to IGFBPs
  • Autocrine/paracrine: Osteoblasts produce IGF-1 locally, stored in bone matrix
  • Released from bone matrix during osteoclastic resorption

Signaling pathway:

  • IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R, receptor tyrosine kinase, homologous to insulin receptor)
  • Activates PI3K-Akt pathway (cell survival, protein synthesis, glucose uptake)
  • Activates MAPK pathway (cell proliferation)

IGF Binding Proteins (IGFBPs):

  • IGFBP-1 through IGFBP-6 modulate IGF bioavailability
  • Sequester IGF in circulation and bone matrix
  • Proteolysis of IGFBPs releases active IGF at target sites
  • IGFBP-3 is most abundant in circulation

GH-IGF-1 Axis

Growth hormone (GH) does not act directly on bone. Instead, GH stimulates the liver to produce IGF-1 (endocrine effect) and stimulates osteoblasts to produce IGF-1 locally (autocrine/paracrine effect). IGF-1 mediates most of the bone growth effects of GH. This explains why GH-deficient children have short stature despite structurally normal bone - they lack IGF-1 to drive longitudinal growth.

Other growth factors:

Growth FactorSourceMain Effect in Bone
PTHrPChondrocytes, periosteum, osteoblastsRegulates chondrocyte differentiation in growth plate
IL-1, IL-6Macrophages, inflammatory cellsInitiates inflammatory phase, stimulates osteoclastogenesis
TNF-αMacrophages, T cellsPromotes osteoclast formation (RANKL pathway), early resorption
Wnt proteinsOsteoblasts, osteocytesPromote osteoblast differentiation (not typical growth factor, more of morphogen)

IGFs and other factors work synergistically with primary growth factors to regulate all phases of bone healing.

Temporal Sequence of Growth Factors in Fracture Healing

Growth factors are expressed in coordinated sequential waves corresponding to healing phases.

Growth Factor Expression During Fracture Healing

Hematoma FormationImmediate (Hours)

Dominant factors: PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF (first wave)

Platelets aggregate and release growth factors from alpha granules immediately upon vascular injury. PDGF and TGF-β initiate inflammatory response and recruit mesenchymal stem cells. VEGF secreted early due to acute hypoxia in hematoma. Chemotactic signals bring cells to fracture site.

InflammationDays 1-7

Dominant factors: TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, TGF-β, FGF-2, VEGF

Inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) from macrophages dominate. These stimulate resorption of necrotic bone and amplify inflammation. TGF-β promotes MSC chemotaxis and early matrix synthesis. FGF-2 and VEGF increase to support proliferation and angiogenesis. Mesenchymal proliferation begins. Soft callus formation initiates.

Soft Callus and TransitionDays 7-21

Dominant factors: TGF-β, BMP-2/4/7 (rising), VEGF (peak), FGF-2

TGF-β peaks driving chondrogenesis (cartilage soft callus formation). BMPs begin expression with mRNA detected by day 7 and peak around days 14-21. VEGF secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes signals vascular invasion. Endochondral ossification begins as blood vessels penetrate cartilage callus.

Hard Callus FormationWeeks 2-6

Dominant factors: BMPs (peak), VEGF, IGF-1, FGF-2

BMP-2 and BMP-7 peak providing strongest osteoinductive signal. Type H vessels invade callus, delivering osteoprogenitors from marrow and circulation. Cartilage progressively replaced by woven bone via endochondral ossification. IGF-1 promotes osteoblast proliferation and collagen synthesis. Mineralization of hard callus accelerates.

RemodelingMonths 3-12+

Dominant factors: TGF-β (coupling), IGF-1, FGFs, RANKL/OPG balance

Woven bone remodeled to organized lamellar bone. TGF-β released from resorbed matrix couples osteoclasts to osteoblasts (recruits MSCs to resorption sites). IGF-1 maintains osteoblast activity during formation phase. FGFs sustain osteoprogenitor pool. External callus gradually resorbed, medullary canal restored. Mechanical loading guides remodeling (Wolff law).

Sequential Not Simultaneous Expression

Growth factor expression is sequential and overlapping, not simultaneous. Early factors (PDGF, inflammatory cytokines) recruit cells. Mid factors (TGF-β, BMPs) drive differentiation and bone formation. Late factors (IGFs, FGFs) sustain remodeling. Therapeutic timing matters - BMP delivered too early during inflammatory phase may be degraded by proteases or cleared. Optimal BMP delivery is week 1-2 when osteoprogenitors are present and inflammatory phase is resolving.

Understanding the temporal cascade explains therapeutic strategies and identifies factors that disrupt normal healing.

Anatomy

BMP Structure and Signaling

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins:

Structure:

  • Dimeric proteins (linked by disulfide bonds)
  • Member of TGF-β superfamily
  • BMP-2 and BMP-7 most potent for bone

Signaling pathway (canonical):

  1. BMP binds to Type I and Type II receptors
  2. Type II receptor phosphorylates Type I
  3. Activated receptor phosphorylates Smad1/5/8
  4. Smad1/5/8 binds Smad4, enters nucleus
  5. Activates Runx2 (master osteoblast regulator)
  6. Osteoblast differentiation and bone formation

VEGF Structure and Signaling

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor:

Structure:

  • Homodimeric glycoprotein
  • Multiple isoforms (VEGF-A most important)
  • Heparin-binding domain for matrix retention

Signaling pathway:

  1. VEGF binds to VEGFR-2 (endothelial cells)
  2. Receptor tyrosine kinase activation
  3. Downstream: PI3K, MAPK, FAK pathways
  4. Endothelial cell proliferation and migration
  5. New blood vessel formation (angiogenesis)
  6. Couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis

Key Growth Factor Signaling Pathways

Growth FactorReceptorSignalingKey Effect
BMP-2/7BMPR-I/II (serine/threonine kinase)Smad1/5/8 → Runx2Osteoblast differentiation
TGF-βTβR-I/II (serine/threonine kinase)Smad2/3 → Smad4MSC proliferation, coupling
VEGFVEGFR-2 (tyrosine kinase)PI3K, MAPK, FAKAngiogenesis
PDGFPDGFR (tyrosine kinase)PI3K, PLCγ, MAPKChemotaxis, early healing
FGFFGFR (tyrosine kinase)RAS-MAPK, PI3KMesenchymal proliferation
IGFIGF-1R (tyrosine kinase)PI3K/AKT, MAPKOsteoblast survival, proliferation

BMP Smad Signaling

BMPs signal through Smad1/5/8 while TGF-β signals through Smad2/3. Both pathways converge on Smad4 to enter the nucleus. BMP-activated Smad1/5/8 directly activates Runx2 (also known as Cbfa1), the master transcription factor for osteoblast differentiation. This is why BMPs are uniquely osteoinductive.

Receptor Complex Architecture

BMP receptor complex:

Type I receptors (ALKs):

  • ALK2, ALK3 (BMPR-IA), ALK6 (BMPR-IB)
  • Serine/threonine kinase activity
  • Phosphorylates Smad1/5/8

Type II receptors:

  • BMPR-II, ActR-II, ActR-IIB
  • Constitutively active kinase
  • Phosphorylates and activates Type I

Signal specificity:

  • Receptor combination determines response
  • ALK3/BMPR-II: canonical BMP signaling
  • Non-Smad pathways also active (MAPK, PI3K)

TGF-β Superfamily Organization

Over 30 members, including:

BMP subfamily:

  • BMP-2, BMP-4 (most potent osteoinductive)
  • BMP-5, BMP-6, BMP-7 (OP-1)
  • GDFs (Growth Differentiation Factors)

TGF-β subfamily:

  • TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3
  • Signal via Smad2/3 (different from BMPs)
  • Proliferative, not differentiation-inducing

Other members:

  • Activins, Inhibins
  • Nodal, Lefty
  • Myostatin (GDF-8)

Runx2 - Master Osteoblast Regulator

Runx2 (Cbfa1) is the key transcription factor:

Activation:

  • BMP signaling via Smad1/5/8 activates Runx2
  • Also activated by Wnt/β-catenin pathway
  • Mechanical loading induces Runx2

Target genes:

  • Osteocalcin (OCN) - late osteoblast marker
  • Osteopontin (OPN) - bone matrix protein
  • Bone sialoprotein (BSP)
  • Type I collagen (COL1A1)
  • Alkaline phosphatase (ALP)

Clinical relevance:

  • Runx2 knockout: complete absence of bone formation
  • Cleidocranial dysplasia: Runx2 haploinsufficiency

Smad Signaling Specificity

The Smad you phosphorylate determines the outcome:

  • BMP → Smad1/5/8 → Runx2 → Osteoblast differentiation
  • TGF-β → Smad2/3 → Proliferation, not differentiation

This is why BMPs are osteoinductive (induce bone) while TGF-β is primarily proliferative. Both are in the same superfamily but have opposite downstream effects on differentiation.

Classification

Growth Factor Families in Bone Healing

FamilyKey MembersPrimary RolePhase of Healing
BMPBMP-2, BMP-4, BMP-7Osteoinduction (bone formation)All phases, especially repair
TGF-βTGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3MSC proliferation, couplingEarly inflammation, remodeling
VEGFVEGF-A (isoforms 121-206)Angiogenesis, couplingCartilage-to-bone transition
PDGFPDGF-AA, PDGF-BBChemotaxis, early healingImmediate (from platelets)
FGFFGF-1, FGF-2, FGF-18Mesenchymal proliferationEarly proliferative phase
IGFIGF-1, IGF-2Osteoblast proliferation/survivalMatrix synthesis phase

BMP Subfamily Classification

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (TGF-β superfamily):

Osteogenic BMPs (bone formation):

  • BMP-2: Most potent, FDA-approved
  • BMP-4: Similar to BMP-2
  • BMP-7 (OP-1): FDA-approved (now discontinued)
  • BMP-6: Osteogenic, research stage

Chondrogenic BMPs:

  • BMP-5: Cartilage development
  • GDF-5: Joint development (BMP-14)

Non-osteogenic BMPs:

  • BMP-3: Inhibits bone formation
  • BMP-15: Ovarian function

Classification by Clinical Use

Recombinant growth factors available:

FDA-approved:

  • rhBMP-2 (INFUSE): ALIF, tibia fractures
  • rhBMP-7 (OP-1): Tibia nonunion (discontinued)
  • rhPDGF-BB (Regranex): Wound healing

Autologous preparations:

  • PRP (platelet-rich plasma): TGF-β, PDGF, VEGF
  • BMC (bone marrow concentrate): MSCs + growth factors

Research stage:

  • rhVEGF, rhFGF, rhIGF-1
  • Combination therapies

Only BMPs are Osteoinductive

BMPs are the only growth factors that can induce ectopic bone formation - meaning they can form bone in non-osseous tissue like muscle. This is true osteoinduction. Other growth factors (VEGF, TGF-β, PDGF, FGF, IGF) are osteoconductive or supportive but cannot induce bone de novo. Urist's 1965 discovery of demineralized bone matrix inducing ectopic bone led to BMP identification.

Detailed BMP Classification

BMPAlternative NameFunctionClinical Status
BMP-2-Most potent osteoinductiveFDA-approved (INFUSE)
BMP-3OsteogeninINHIBITS bone formationNot therapeutic
BMP-4-Osteoinductive, similar to BMP-2Research
BMP-5-Skeletal developmentResearch
BMP-6-Osteogenic, iron metabolismClinical trials
BMP-7OP-1OsteoinductiveFDA-approved (discontinued)
GDF-5BMP-14, CDMP-1Joint and tendon developmentResearch
GDF-8MyostatinINHIBITS muscle growthResearch (muscle wasting)

TGF-β Classification

Transforming Growth Factor-Beta isoforms:

TGF-β1:

  • Most abundant in bone matrix
  • Released during resorption (coupling)
  • Promotes MSC chemotaxis and proliferation
  • INHIBITS terminal osteoblast differentiation

TGF-β2:

  • Similar functions to TGF-β1
  • Important in development

TGF-β3:

  • Scarless wound healing
  • Less fibrotic response

VEGF Isoform Classification

VEGF isoforms (alternative splicing):

VEGF-A isoforms:

  • VEGF121: Freely diffusible, no heparin binding
  • VEGF165: Most abundant, partially matrix-bound
  • VEGF189, VEGF206: Fully matrix-bound

Other VEGF family members:

  • VEGF-B: Cardiac angiogenesis
  • VEGF-C, VEGF-D: Lymphangiogenesis
  • PlGF: Placental, pathological angiogenesis

Clinical relevance:

  • VEGF165 is key isoform for bone angiogenesis
  • Balance of isoforms affects vessel stability

Phase-Dependent Growth Factor Expression

Temporal expression during fracture healing:

Inflammatory phase (Days 0-5):

  • PDGF, TGF-β from platelets (immediate)
  • IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α recruit inflammatory cells
  • FGF-2 peaks, promotes mesenchymal migration

Soft callus phase (Days 5-14):

  • VEGF peaks (angiogenesis)
  • TGF-β maintains proliferation
  • BMP expression begins

Hard callus phase (Weeks 2-6):

  • BMP-2, BMP-7 peak (osteoblast differentiation)
  • VEGF maintains for vascular invasion
  • IGF-1 promotes matrix synthesis

Remodeling phase (Weeks 6+):

  • TGF-β coupling (released from resorbed bone)
  • BMPs at lower levels for continued remodeling

VEGF from Hypertrophic Chondrocytes

During endochondral ossification (fracture healing), VEGF is secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes just before they undergo apoptosis. This VEGF signal recruits blood vessels (Type H endothelium) that bring osteoblast precursors. Without VEGF, the cartilage callus cannot be replaced by bone - VEGF couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis. This is a critical exam point.

Clinical Applications and Therapeutic Use

BMP-2 and BMP-7 Clinical Use

BMPs are the only growth factors with robust FDA approval and widespread clinical use in orthopaedics.

rhBMP-2 (InFuse, Medtronic):

  • FDA-approved indications:
    1. ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) single level L4-S1
    2. Open tibial shaft fractures (Gustilo type IIIA, IIIB, IIIC)
    3. Oral maxillofacial reconstructive surgery
  • Mechanism: Osteoinduction (induces bone formation in non-skeletal sites, true ectopic bone)
  • Delivery: Absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) carrier for sustained release
  • Typical dose: 12 mg total for ALIF (1.5 mg/mL concentration on sponge)
  • Efficacy: 94-100% fusion rate in ALIF vs 85-90% with autograft
  • Advantages: Avoids donor site morbidity (iliac crest pain 10-20%, infection risk)

Evidence:

  • BESTT trial (2002): Level I RCT, rhBMP-2 superior to autograft for open tibia fractures
  • Reduced infection risk, faster healing, fewer secondary procedures
  • Spine trials: Multiple RCTs showing non-inferiority to autograft for fusion
  • Industry-funded trials showed higher fusion rates with BMP

Off-label use (controversial, common in practice):

  • Posterolateral lumbar fusion
  • Cervical spine fusion (FDA warning - airway complications)
  • Revision spine surgery
  • Long bone nonunions
  • Pelvis and acetabular fractures

rhBMP-7 (OP-1, Olympus/Stryker):

  • Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) for recalcitrant long bone nonunions
  • Less availability (withdrawn from many markets)
  • Lower osteoinductive potency than BMP-2
  • Potentially fewer inflammatory complications
  • Requires IRB approval for use in United States

BMP products are highly effective but require careful risk-benefit assessment.

rhBMP-2 Complications and Controversies

Serious complications (rates vary by indication and dose):

ComplicationMechanismIncidenceClinical Impact
Ectopic bone formationBMP induces bone outside fusion site10-30% ALIFMay cause nerve compression, spinal stenosis
Retrograde ejaculationInflammatory nerve plexus injury2-5% ALIF (males)Permanent in some cases, quality of life impact
Osteolysis/radiolucencyParadoxical bone resorption10-20% spineMay require revision if symptomatic
Inflammatory swellingBMP-induced inflammationVariableSeroma, wound complications, airway risk cervical
Cancer riskControversial, conflicting dataUnknownIndependent analyses dispute initial concerns

Cervical spine complications (FDA Public Health Notification 2008):

  • Life-threatening prevertebral soft tissue swelling
  • Airway compromise requiring intubation
  • Dysphagia, hoarseness, wound complications
  • FDA warning against off-label use in anterior cervical spine

Dose-response relationship:

  • Higher doses increase fusion rates but also complications
  • Some spine surgeons use doses above FDA-approved levels
  • "More is not better" - optimal dosing still debated

Informed Consent Critical

Informed consent is critical for rhBMP-2 use. Patients must understand potential complications including ectopic bone, retrograde ejaculation (males), and osteolysis. Off-label use requires thorough discussion of risks and lack of FDA approval for that specific indication. Document shared decision-making process.

Understanding complications allows appropriate patient selection and risk mitigation strategies.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC)

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP):

Rationale: Concentrate platelets (and growth factors) from autologous blood to deliver supraphysiologic doses of PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF, FGF-2, IGF-1 to healing site.

Preparation methods:

  • Centrifuge whole blood to separate platelet-rich layer
  • Activate with thrombin, calcium chloride, or freeze-thaw to release granule contents
  • Concentration factor: 2-8x platelet baseline (typical target 1 million/μL)

Growth factor content (varies widely by preparation method):

  • PDGF-BB: 2-10x baseline concentration
  • TGF-β1: 2-5x baseline
  • VEGF: 2-10x baseline
  • IGF-1, FGF-2: Present in variable amounts

Clinical evidence:

IndicationEvidence QualityEffect SizeRecommendation
Bone healing (fractures, fusion)Low (heterogeneous studies)No significant benefit in meta-analysesNot recommended routinely
Tendon injuries (tennis elbow, patellar tendinopathy)ModerateSmall to moderate short-term pain reductionMay consider for refractory cases
Rotator cuff repair augmentationModerateNo benefit in healing or outcomesNot recommended
Knee osteoarthritisLow to moderateShort-term pain reduction (3-6 months), no structural benefitWeak evidence, patient preference

Limitations of PRP:

  • Variable preparation methods (no standardization across studies or clinics)
  • Platelet-poor plasma may work similarly (physiologic doses may be sufficient)
  • Activated platelets release pro-inflammatory mediators, not just growth factors
  • Placebo effect substantial (injection procedure, belief in treatment)
  • Cost not covered by insurance, patient pays out-of-pocket

PRP Evidence Quality

PRP evidence is low quality for most orthopaedic applications. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses conclude insufficient evidence to recommend routine use. Studies are heterogeneous with variable preparation methods, dosing, patient selection, and outcome measures. Large placebo effect makes interpretation difficult. May have limited role as adjunct in refractory tendinopathies. Not recommended for bone healing or OA based on current evidence.

Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC):

Rationale: Concentrate nucleated cells from bone marrow aspirate to deliver mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and endogenous growth factors.

Preparation:

  • Aspirate bone marrow (typically posterior iliac crest)
  • Centrifuge to concentrate nucleated cells (remove RBCs and plasma)
  • Inject concentrated cell fraction at treatment site

Contents of BMC:

  • MSCs: 0.001-0.01% of nucleated cells (very low concentration)
  • Hematopoietic progenitor cells (majority of nucleated cells)
  • Growth factors: Lower than PRP (fewer platelets in marrow aspirate)
  • Cytokines and chemokines

Clinical evidence:

  • Fracture nonunion: Case series show benefit, no high-quality RCTs vs autograft
  • Osteoarthritis: Minimal evidence, short-term pain reduction at best, no structural benefit
  • Cartilage defects: Limited benefit, inferior to established procedures (ACI, OATS)

Limitations:

  • MSC concentration very low (most cells are hematopoietic, not mesenchymal)
  • MSC potency declines dramatically with age (limited efficacy in elderly)
  • Variable aspiration technique and cell yield between operators
  • No FDA-approved indications (used off-label based on surgeon judgment)
  • No standardization of preparation or dosing

PRP and BMC are autologous, relatively low-risk adjuncts but lack robust evidence of efficacy for most applications.

Investigations

Assessment of Bone Healing

Radiographic Assessment:

  • Serial plain radiographs (most common)
  • CT scan for complex anatomy or suspected nonunion
  • MRI for soft tissue assessment

Healing Milestones:

  • Bridging callus visible: 6-12 weeks
  • Cortical bridging (3/4 cortices): union definition
  • Remodeling: 6 months to years

Laboratory Markers

Bone Formation Markers:

  • Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) - osteoblast activity
  • P1NP (procollagen type 1 N-propeptide)
  • Osteocalcin

Bone Resorption Markers:

  • CTX (C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen)
  • NTX (N-telopeptide)

Note: Growth factor levels (BMP, VEGF) not routinely measured clinically

Laboratory Markers Not Useful for Monitoring

Serum growth factor levels (BMP-2, VEGF, TGF-β) are NOT routinely measured clinically. Bone formation/resorption markers (ALP, P1NP, CTX) provide indirect evidence of healing activity but are not specific enough for routine fracture monitoring. Serial radiographs remain the standard for assessing bone healing.

Advanced Assessment Modalities

Imaging Modalities for Assessing Bone Healing

ModalityStrengthsLimitationsBest Use
Plain RadiographInexpensive, widely available, reproducible2D, limited sensitivity early healingStandard surveillance
CT Scan3D assessment, detects bridging callus, evaluates cortical continuityRadiation, cost, metal artifactSuspected nonunion, complex anatomy
MRISoft tissue, edema, vascular status, no radiationCost, limited for cortical boneAVN assessment, soft tissue complications
DEXAQuantitative bone densityLimited spatial resolutionOsteoporosis screening, not routine
PET-CT (18F-NaF)Metabolic activity, early detection of healing vs nonunionExpensive, radiation, limited availabilityResearch, complex cases

Research Tools for Growth Factor Assessment

In Research Settings (not clinical):

  • Immunohistochemistry for BMP-2, BMP-7, VEGF in callus tissue
  • ELISA for serum/tissue growth factor levels
  • qPCR for gene expression of growth factors
  • Micro-CT for quantitative callus analysis
  • Histomorphometry for BIC%, bone formation rate

Gene Expression Studies:

  • Temporal expression patterns documented in animal models
  • PDGF/TGF-β peak early (days 1-3)
  • VEGF peaks during soft callus phase (days 7-14)
  • BMP-2/7 peak during hard callus formation (days 14-21)

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Growth Factors Bone Healing
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Growth Factors Bone HealingCredit: OrthoVellum

FDA-Approved Indications for rhBMP-2

INFUSE Bone Graft (rhBMP-2):

Approved indications:

  1. ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion): L4-S1, single level, degenerative disc disease
  2. Open tibial shaft fractures: Gustilo type IIIA/IIIB, with IM nail fixation

Delivery vehicle: Absorbable collagen sponge (ACS)

Standard dosing:

  • ALIF: 12 mg (two 6 mg kits)
  • Open tibia: 12 mg applied at fracture site

Off-Label Uses (Surgeon Judgment)

Common off-label applications:

  • Posterior lumbar fusion (PLIF, TLIF)
  • Cervical fusion (with significant risks)
  • Long bone nonunions
  • Revision arthroplasty with bone loss
  • Spinal pseudarthrosis revision

Important: Off-label use based on surgeon judgment, patient counseling essential regarding risks

Cervical Spine Warning - FDA Black Box

rhBMP-2 should NOT be used in cervical spine. The FDA issued a 2008 Public Health Notification warning of life-threatening complications:

  • Severe airway swelling requiring intubation/tracheostomy
  • Dysphagia, dysphonia
  • Hematoma, seroma
  • Ectopic bone formation causing compression

These complications can occur 2-14 days postoperatively, even after initially uneventful surgery.

Know the Approved Indications

FDA-approved indications for rhBMP-2: (1) ALIF L4-S1 single level and (2) Open tibial shaft fractures Gustilo IIIA/IIIB. All other uses are OFF-LABEL. Cervical use is contraindicated due to airway complications.

Clinical Decision-Making for BMP Use

Growth Factor Products Available

ProductAgentDeliveryApproved IndicationStatus
INFUSE (Medtronic)rhBMP-2Collagen spongeALIF, open tibia fracturesFDA approved
OP-1 (Stryker)rhBMP-7Collagen carrierLong bone nonunion (HDE)Discontinued 2014
DBM ProductsNative BMPs (low dose)Matrix carrierBone graft extender510(k) cleared
PRP SystemsPDGF, TGF-β, VEGFPlatelet gelNo FDA bone indicationOff-label

Patient Selection for BMP Use

Consider BMP when:

  • High risk of nonunion (smoking, diabetes, open fractures)
  • Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis
  • Large bone defects requiring osteoinduction
  • Inadequate autograft availability

Relative contraindications:

  • History of malignancy (theoretical concern for tumor promotion)
  • Active infection
  • Known hypersensitivity to bovine collagen
  • Pregnancy (Category C)
  • Cervical spine use (absolute contraindication)

Counsel patients about:

  • Inflammatory response and swelling
  • Risk of ectopic bone formation
  • Potential need for additional procedures

Surgical Technique

rhBMP-2 Application Technique

INFUSE Preparation:

  1. Reconstitute rhBMP-2 with sterile water
  2. Allow 15 minutes for protein binding to collagen sponge
  3. Sponge should be evenly saturated

Application:

  • Apply sponge directly to bone surfaces
  • For ALIF: place within interbody cage
  • For open tibia fractures: apply at fracture site over fixation
  • Avoid direct contact with neural elements

Handling Precautions

Critical handling requirements:

  • Keep sponge moist during application
  • Do not fold, roll, or compress sponge (reduces surface area)
  • Use within 2 hours of reconstitution
  • Store at 2-8°C until use

Avoid contamination with:

  • Blood (dilutes growth factor concentration)
  • Irrigation fluids (same reason)
  • Direct suction on sponge

BMP Application Principles

Key technical points: Allow 15 minutes for rhBMP-2 to bind to collagen sponge after reconstitution. Apply sponge directly to bone surfaces without compressing or folding. Avoid contact with neural structures. Do not allow blood or irrigation to dilute the growth factor concentration before application.

Technical Considerations by Application

BMP Application by Procedure

ProcedureTechniquePrecautionsSpecific Risks
ALIFPlace BMP-soaked sponge inside interbody cageAvoid anterior extrusion, ensure contained spaceRetrograde ejaculation (2-5%), osteolysis
PLIF/TLIF (off-label)Apply in posterolateral gutters, within cageAvoid contact with dura, nerve rootsRadiculopathy, ectopic bone in canal
Open tibia fractureApply at fracture site after debridement and fixationAdequate soft tissue coverage requiredHeterotopic ossification, wound complications
Nonunion (off-label)Apply at nonunion site with bone graftEnsure adequate blood supply and stabilityInflammatory reaction may be prominent

Bone Graft Options and Growth Factor Synergy

Autograft (gold standard):

  • Contains osteogenic cells, osteoinductive factors, and osteoconductive scaffold
  • Iliac crest: 30-40 mL cancellous bone
  • Donor site morbidity: pain (10-30%), sensory changes, infection, fracture

Allograft:

  • Osteoconductive scaffold only
  • Combined with BMP provides osteoinduction
  • No donor site morbidity

Combination approach (common):

  • Allograft or synthetic scaffold (osteoconductive)
  • BMP or DBM (osteoinductive)
  • Local bone marrow aspirate (osteogenic cells)
  • Addresses diamond concept requirements

Complications

Local Complications of rhBMP-2

Ectopic Bone Formation (10-30%):

  • Bone forms outside intended fusion site
  • Risk: neural compression, functional limitation
  • Higher with supraphysiologic doses

Inflammatory Response:

  • Expected local swelling (2-14 days)
  • Seroma, hematoma
  • Wound drainage, delayed wound healing

Osteolysis:

  • Paradoxical early bone resorption
  • Typically resolves with fusion progression

Site-Specific Complications

Cervical spine (contraindicated):

  • Life-threatening airway swelling
  • Dysphagia, dysphonia
  • May require intubation/tracheostomy

Lumbar ALIF:

  • Retrograde ejaculation (2-5%)
  • Sympathetic plexus irritation
  • More common at L5-S1

Posterior spine:

  • Radiculopathy from ectopic bone in canal
  • CSF leak if dura exposed

Ectopic Bone Formation

Ectopic bone formation is the most common complication of BMP use, occurring in 10-30% of cases. It results from:

  • Supraphysiologic dosing (rhBMP-2 dose far exceeds normal physiologic levels)
  • Growth factor diffusion outside intended site
  • Potent osteoinductive capacity (only BMP can form bone ectopically)

Management: Prevention by containment (cages, barriers), surgical excision if symptomatic.

Complication Management and Prevention

rhBMP-2 Complications by Application

ApplicationComplicationIncidenceManagement
Cervical (contraindicated)Airway swellingUp to 40% in case seriesAvoid use, intubation if occurs
ALIF L5-S1Retrograde ejaculation2-5%Patient counseling, usually permanent
ALIFOsteolysisVariableUsually resolves, may require revision if cage subsidence
Posterior fusionRadiculopathyVariableMay require decompression, ectopic bone excision
Open tibia fractureHeterotopic ossification10-20%Excision if limiting ROM, typically 6+ months post-op

Risk Factors for Complications

Patient factors:

  • Smoking (higher complication rate, lower fusion rate)
  • Diabetes (impaired healing, higher infection risk)
  • Obesity (wound complications)

Technical factors:

  • High BMP dose (ectopic bone, osteolysis)
  • Poor containment (ectopic bone formation)
  • Contact with neural elements (radiculopathy)
  • Inadequate hemostasis (hematoma dilutes BMP)

Prevention strategies:

  • Use lowest effective dose
  • Ensure containment within fusion site
  • Avoid contact with neural structures
  • Consider barriers to limit diffusion

Postoperative Care

Monitoring After BMP Use

Expected findings:

  • Local swelling (peaks 2-7 days, resolves by 2-4 weeks)
  • Mild wound drainage common early
  • Seroma may develop (usually self-limiting)

Warning signs requiring attention:

  • Progressive swelling after day 7
  • Fever, erythema (infection vs expected inflammation)
  • New neurological symptoms
  • Airway compromise (cervical procedures)

Standard Postoperative Care

Activity:

  • Follow standard protocols for procedure performed
  • BMP does not change weight-bearing or mobilization
  • Brace use per surgeon preference

Medications:

  • Standard pain management
  • NSAIDs: Theoretical concern for bone healing inhibition
  • Antibiotics per surgical prophylaxis guidelines

Follow-up imaging:

  • Serial radiographs to assess fusion/healing
  • Timing per standard protocols (6 weeks, 3 months, etc.)

NSAIDs and Bone Healing

NSAIDs theoretically inhibit bone healing by blocking prostaglandin synthesis (COX-2 pathway). Prostaglandins are important in early inflammation and bone formation. However, clinical evidence is mixed, and short courses for acute pain are generally considered acceptable. Avoid prolonged NSAID use (especially in high-risk patients or spinal fusion).

Specific Considerations

Postoperative Monitoring by Procedure

ProcedureSpecific MonitoringExpected TimelineFusion Assessment
ALIF with BMPRetrograde ejaculation symptoms, neurological statusInflammation resolves 2-4 weeksCT at 6-12 months for fusion
Open tibia fractureWound healing, soft tissue coverageCallus visible 6-12 weeksBridging on X-ray = union
Posterolateral fusionRadicular symptoms, wound drainageSwelling 1-2 weeksCT or flexion-extension X-ray at 1 year
Nonunion treatmentPain resolution, mechanical stabilityVariable, often 4-6 monthsCT for bridging callus

Optimizing Healing Environment

Modifiable factors to address postoperatively:

  • Smoking cessation: Nicotine impairs angiogenesis and osteoblast function
  • Diabetes control: Target HbA1c less than 8%
  • Nutrition: Adequate protein, calcium, vitamin D
  • Weight-bearing: Per fixation stability and protocol

Medications affecting bone healing:

  • NSAIDs: May inhibit (avoid prolonged use)
  • Corticosteroids: Inhibitory, avoid if possible
  • Bisphosphonates: Can continue (may slightly delay remodeling but don't impair union)
  • Teriparatide: May enhance healing (off-label for fractures)

Outcomes

BMP-2 Efficacy in Spinal Fusion

ALIF (approved indication):

  • Fusion rates: 94-99% (comparable to autograft)
  • Eliminates iliac crest harvest morbidity
  • FDA approval based on non-inferiority to ICBG

Posterior fusion (off-label):

  • Meta-analyses show higher fusion rates vs autograft
  • Fusion rates: 90-95%
  • Higher complication rates than ALIF

BMP-2 in Open Tibia Fractures

BESTT Trial (Govender 2002):

  • 450 patients, Gustilo IIIA/IIIB fractures
  • rhBMP-2 vs standard care
  • Reduced secondary interventions
  • Faster healing, reduced infection in IIIA/IIIB

Clinical impact:

  • Particularly beneficial in high-grade open fractures
  • Cost-benefit favorable for IIIA/IIIB injuries

Controversy: Cost vs Benefit

rhBMP-2 is expensive (approximately $5,000-10,000 per kit). Meta-analyses show high fusion rates but also higher complication rates than initially reported by industry. Cost-benefit analysis favors use in: (1) high-risk patients for nonunion, (2) avoiding autograft morbidity, (3) revision surgery for pseudarthrosis. Not routinely used for all fusions due to cost and complications.

Evidence Summary and Meta-Analysis

Key Clinical Outcomes for rhBMP-2

ApplicationFusion/Healing RateComplication Ratevs Autograft
ALIF L4-S194-99%RE 2-5%, osteolysis variableNon-inferior (FDA approved)
Posterior lumbar (off-label)90-95%Radiculopathy, ectopic boneHigher fusion, higher complications
Open tibia IIIA/IIIBImproved union, fewer interventionsHO, wound issuesBeneficial (FDA approved)
Nonunion (off-label)Variable, 70-90%Inflammatory responseOften used with autograft

Controversy: Industry Bias in Original Trials

YODA Project Review (2013):

  • Independent review of Medtronic-sponsored BMP trials
  • Found underreporting of adverse events in original publications
  • Complication rates higher than initially reported
  • Conclusions: BMP effective for fusion but complications significant

Key findings:

  • Ectopic bone: underreported in original trials
  • Retrograde ejaculation: higher than initially stated
  • Cancer risk: initially raised concern, subsequent analysis shows no increased risk
  • Overall: efficacy confirmed but complication profile different than marketed

Evidence Base

Discovery of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins

5
Urist MR • Science (1965)
Key Findings:
  • Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) implanted into rabbit muscle induces ectopic bone formation
  • Proved existence of bone-inductive factors within bone matrix
  • Laid foundation for decades of research to isolate and clone BMPs
  • Demonstrated true osteoinduction - bone formation in non-skeletal site
  • Led directly to development of recombinant BMPs for clinical use
Clinical Implication: Urist's discovery established the concept of osteoinduction and initiated the search for BMPs. This work led to isolation of BMP-2 and BMP-7, development of recombinant proteins, and eventual FDA approval for clinical use in spinal fusion and fracture treatment.

Recombinant BMP-2 for Open Tibia Fractures (BESTT Trial)

1
Govender S, Csimma C, Genant HK, et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2002)
Key Findings:
  • RCT of 450 patients with open tibia fractures (Gustilo types II, IIIA, IIIB)
  • rhBMP-2 (1.5 mg/mL on collagen sponge) vs standard care
  • Significantly reduced infection risk in IIIA/B fractures (composite endpoint)
  • Faster time to union and reduced need for secondary interventions
  • Type IIIA and IIIB fractures showed greatest benefit from BMP-2
  • Adverse events similar between groups, no safety concerns identified
Clinical Implication: Level I evidence supporting FDA approval of rhBMP-2 for acute open tibia fractures. Demonstrated both safety and efficacy in high-risk fractures with significant soft tissue injury. BMP-2 reduces infection and accelerates healing when combined with standard fixation and soft tissue management.
Limitation: Industry-funded trial (Medtronic). Unclear whether benefit applies to other fracture types. Cost-effectiveness not addressed.

VEGF Essential for Fracture Healing

2
Street J, Bao M, deGuzman L, et al • J Bone Miner Res (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Conditional VEGF knockout mice show severely delayed fracture healing
  • VEGF inhibition (VEGF-Trap) in rat fracture model impairs callus formation
  • Anti-VEGF treated fractures show 50% reduction in callus mineralization
  • Reduced angiogenesis, fewer blood vessels in callus, delayed endochondral ossification
  • VEGF blockade prevents coupling of angiogenesis to osteogenesis
  • Exogenous VEGF enhances healing in critical-size defects in animal models
Clinical Implication: Proved VEGF is essential for coupling angiogenesis to osteogenesis during fracture healing. Explains why anti-VEGF cancer drugs (bevacizumab) impair bone repair in humans. Validates VEGF as potential therapeutic target for nonunions and critical defects, though clinical translation limited.
Limitation: Animal models, supraphysiologic VEGF inhibition. Clinical anti-VEGF doses may have less dramatic effects, though case reports suggest impaired healing in cancer patients on these drugs.

TGF-β and Bone Remodeling Coupling

2
Tang Y, Wu X, Lei W, et al • Nat Med (2009)
Key Findings:
  • TGF-β is most abundant growth factor in bone matrix (200 μg/kg bone)
  • Released from matrix during osteoclastic resorption into resorption lacuna
  • Recruits mesenchymal stem cells to resorption sites (chemotactic gradient)
  • Blocking TGF-β signaling (with neutralizing antibody) impairs coupling
  • Uncoupled remodeling leads to net bone loss (resorption without adequate formation)
  • TGF-β is key molecular mediator of coupling mechanism
Clinical Implication: TGF-β is the critical molecular mediator of coupling - the mechanism linking bone resorption to subsequent formation during remodeling. This explains the coordinated action of osteoclasts and osteoblasts in the remodeling cycle. Disruption of TGF-β signaling leads to uncoupled remodeling and bone loss.
Limitation: Primarily animal studies. TGF-β effects are complex and context-dependent, making therapeutic targeting challenging.

rhBMP-2 Complications in Cervical Spine - FDA Safety Review

4
Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK • Spine J (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of off-label rhBMP-2 use in anterior cervical fusion
  • Life-threatening prevertebral soft tissue swelling causing airway compromise reported
  • Dysphagia, hoarseness, wound complications significantly increased vs controls
  • Inflammatory swelling in confined anterior cervical space creates airway risk
  • FDA issued Public Health Notification in 2008 warning against cervical use
  • Industry-funded studies did not adequately report adverse events
Clinical Implication: High-dose rhBMP-2 in confined anterior cervical space causes dangerous prevertebral inflammation and swelling. Off-label cervical use should be avoided or approached with extreme caution. Stick to FDA-approved indications (lumbar spine ALIF, open tibia fractures). Highlights importance of independent safety analysis beyond industry-funded studies.
Limitation: Retrospective analysis and case series. Difficult to determine exact incidence of complications. Dose-response relationship for cervical complications not well characterized.

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the key growth factors involved in bone healing and their primary functions?

A: (1) BMPs (BMP-2, BMP-7): Osteoinductive - induce mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to osteoblasts. (2) TGF-β: Stimulates matrix synthesis, chondrocyte proliferation. (3) PDGF: Mitogenic for osteoblasts and mesenchymal cells, angiogenesis. (4) VEGF: Angiogenesis - essential for revascularization. (5) FGF: Mitogenic, angiogenic, stimulates chondrocyte proliferation.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the difference between osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and osteogenesis?

A: Osteoinduction: Stimulation of primitive cells to differentiate into bone-forming cells (BMPs). Osteoconduction: Scaffold that permits bone growth along its surface (HA, TCP, allograft). Osteogenesis: Living cells directly forming new bone (autograft with osteoblasts/progenitors). Autograft has all three properties. Allograft is osteoconductive only. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is osteoinductive and osteoconductive.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the clinical indications for BMP-2 (rhBMP-2/INFUSE) in orthopaedic surgery?

A: FDA-approved indications: (1) ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) - most common use. (2) Acute open tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nail fixation. (3) Sinus augmentation/alveolar ridge procedures (dental). Off-label uses (controversial): Posterolateral spine fusion, nonunion treatment. Complications: Heterotopic ossification, swelling (anterior cervical use - black box warning), possible cancer concern.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the "Diamond Concept" of bone healing?

A: Four essential elements for successful bone healing: (1) Osteogenic cells: Mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblast precursors. (2) Osteoconductive scaffold: Matrix for cell attachment and bone growth. (3) Osteoinductive growth factors: BMPs, TGF-β to stimulate differentiation. (4) Mechanical stability: Appropriate fixation for biological environment. Addressing all four elements optimizes healing, especially in nonunion management.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the advantages and disadvantages of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in orthopaedics?

A: Advantages: Autologous (no disease transmission), contains multiple growth factors (PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF, IGF), easy bedside preparation, relatively low cost. Disadvantages: Variable preparation methods affect concentration, inconsistent evidence for efficacy, no standardization of formulations. Best evidence: Lateral epicondylitis, rotator cuff repair augmentation, ACL surgery. Controversial in bone healing, tendinopathy.

Australian Context

TGA Approval Status

INFUSE Bone Graft (rhBMP-2):

  • TGA registered in Australia
  • Approved indications similar to FDA:
    • Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)
    • Open tibial shaft fractures

Prosthetic Devices Committee:

  • Listed for private health fund rebate
  • Specific criteria for reimbursement

Australian Practice Patterns

Usage trends:

  • BMP use varies by surgeon and center
  • More common in private practice than public hospitals
  • Cost considerations significant in public system

Off-label use:

  • Common for posterior lumbar fusion
  • Used in complex revision surgery
  • Surgeon discretion with patient counseling

Australian Regulatory Context

rhBMP-2 (INFUSE) is TGA-registered for ALIF and open tibia fractures, similar to FDA indications. Off-label use is common in Australian practice but requires appropriate patient counseling. Cost considerations affect availability in public hospitals. AOANJRR does not track biologics use in arthroplasty, so registry data on BMP in revision surgery is limited.

Australian Practice Considerations

Growth Factor Products in Australia

ProductTGA StatusPBS/Prostheses ListTypical Cost
INFUSE (rhBMP-2)RegisteredProstheses List with criteria$5,000-10,000 AUD
OP-1 (rhBMP-7)Discontinued globallyNot availableN/A
DBM ProductsVarious registeredNot on Prostheses List$500-2,000 AUD
PRP SystemsDevices registeredNot reimbursedVariable

Cost-Effectiveness in Australian Healthcare

Private sector:

  • BMP available with private health fund rebate
  • Prostheses List criteria must be met
  • Patient may have out-of-pocket costs

Public sector:

  • Cost often prohibitive for routine use
  • Reserved for high-risk cases, revision surgery
  • Hospital formulary approval may be required
  • Cost-benefit analysis increasingly important

eTG Guidance:

  • No specific Therapeutic Guidelines for BMP use
  • Surgeon discretion based on clinical evidence
  • Document rationale for off-label use

Australian Research and Training

Key Australian contributions:

  • Multiple Australian centers involved in BMP trials
  • AOA orthobiologics research initiatives
  • FRACS curriculum includes growth factors in basic science

Training requirements:

  • Understanding of bone biology and growth factors
  • Knowledge of approved indications and complications
  • Competence in discussing off-label use with patients

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Viva Scenario: BMP Signaling Pathway

EXAMINER

"An examiner asks you to describe the BMP signaling pathway that leads to osteoblast differentiation."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
BMP signaling proceeds through the canonical Smad pathway: (1) **BMP dimer** (e.g., BMP-2) binds to a receptor complex containing Type I (ALK2, ALK3, ALK6) and Type II (BMPR-II) serine/threonine kinase receptors; (2) Type II receptor phosphorylates and activates Type I receptor; (3) Activated Type I receptor phosphorylates **Smad1, Smad5, or Smad8** on C-terminal serine residues; (4) Phosphorylated Smad1/5/8 forms a complex with **Smad4** (common mediator); (5) This complex translocates to the nucleus; (6) Nuclear Smad complex binds DNA and activates transcription of **Runx2**, the master osteoblast transcription factor; (7) Runx2 then activates genes for osteoblast differentiation (osteocalcin, ALP, type I collagen).
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
BMP binds Type I + Type II receptor complex
Type II phosphorylates Type I receptor
Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation (distinct from TGF-β Smad2/3)
Smad4 is common mediator for nuclear translocation
Runx2 is the master osteoblast transcription factor
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing BMP signaling (Smad1/5/8) with TGF-β (Smad2/3)
✗Forgetting Smad4 as the common mediator
✗Not mentioning Runx2 as the key target
✗Describing tyrosine kinase instead of serine/threonine kinase
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Viva Scenario: Growth Factor Temporal Expression

EXAMINER

"Describe the temporal sequence of growth factor expression during fracture healing."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Growth factor expression follows a coordinated temporal pattern: **Immediate (0-24 hours):** Platelet degranulation releases **PDGF and TGF-β** from alpha granules, initiating the cascade. **Inflammatory phase (Days 1-5):** IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α recruit inflammatory cells; **FGF-2** peaks to stimulate mesenchymal proliferation and migration. **Soft callus (Days 5-14):** **VEGF** expression peaks, secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes to initiate vascular invasion; TGF-β maintains proliferative state. **Hard callus (Weeks 2-6):** **BMP-2 and BMP-7** peak, driving osteoblast differentiation and bone formation; VEGF continues for angiogenesis; **IGF-1** promotes matrix synthesis. **Remodeling (Weeks 6+):** **TGF-β** released from resorbed bone couples resorption to formation; BMP expression decreases to basal levels.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
PDGF and TGF-β from platelets initiate cascade (immediate)
FGF-2 peaks early for mesenchymal proliferation
VEGF peaks at soft-to-hard callus transition (angiogenesis)
BMP-2/7 peak during hard callus (osteoblast differentiation)
TGF-β released during remodeling (coupling)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Getting the temporal sequence wrong (PDGF first, then FGF, VEGF, BMP)
✗Saying BMPs peak during inflammation (they peak later)
✗Forgetting VEGF role in cartilage-to-bone transition
✗Not mentioning TGF-β biphasic role (early and remodeling)
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"How would you assess whether a patient's fracture is healing adequately?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would use clinical and radiographic assessment. Clinically, I would assess pain at the fracture site (decreasing with healing), functional use of the limb, and any point tenderness. Radiographically, I would look for bridging callus on serial radiographs - typically visible by 6-12 weeks. Union is defined by bridging of 3 out of 4 cortices on orthogonal views. If concerned about delayed union, CT provides 3D assessment of cortical bridging. Laboratory markers like alkaline phosphatase and P1NP reflect bone formation activity but are not specific for fracture healing and not routinely used for monitoring.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Clinical: decreasing pain, increasing function, no point tenderness
Radiographic: bridging callus, 3/4 cortices bridged = union
CT for suspected nonunion or complex anatomy
Laboratory markers not routinely used for fracture monitoring
COMMON TRAPS
✗Claiming you would measure serum BMP or VEGF levels
✗Relying solely on laboratory markers for healing assessment
✗Not recognizing that callus visible on radiograph takes 6-12 weeks
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old male with diabetes presents with a tibial shaft nonunion at 9 months post-injury. Would you use BMP-2? Discuss your management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a challenging case of tibial nonunion in a patient with diabetes, which is a risk factor for impaired healing. For a hypertrophic nonunion, I would first optimize mechanical stability - revision of fixation if needed. For atrophic nonunion, biological augmentation is indicated. rhBMP-2 is FDA-approved for open tibial fractures but off-label for nonunions. Given the high-risk biology (diabetes), I would consider BMP-2 as part of a comprehensive strategy including: (1) ruling out infection with inflammatory markers and possibly biopsy, (2) optimizing diabetes control (HbA1c under 8%), (3) smoking cessation if applicable, (4) revision fixation for mechanical stability, and (5) bone grafting with or without BMP augmentation. I would counsel the patient about off-label use and the inflammatory response expected with BMP.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Classify nonunion: hypertrophic (mechanical) vs atrophic (biological)
Rule out infection before using BMP
Optimize modifiable risk factors (diabetes, smoking)
BMP-2 off-label for nonunion but reasonable in high-risk cases
Counsel patient about off-label use and expected inflammation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using BMP without addressing mechanical stability
✗Not ruling out infection before growth factor use
✗Claiming BMP is approved for nonunion (it's off-label)
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"How do you apply rhBMP-2 during an ALIF procedure?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For an ALIF at L4-S1, after completing the discectomy and preparing the endplates, I would prepare the INFUSE bone graft. I reconstitute the rhBMP-2 powder with sterile water and apply it to the absorbable collagen sponge, allowing 15 minutes for binding. The standard kit provides 12 mg for single-level fusion. I apply the BMP-soaked sponge inside the interbody cage, ensuring it is contained within the disc space and does not extrude anteriorly. I then impact the cage into position. It's critical to avoid contact with neural structures posteriorly and to ensure the sponge is contained to minimize ectopic bone formation. I counsel patients preoperatively about the 2-5% risk of retrograde ejaculation, particularly at L5-S1.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Allow 15 minutes for rhBMP-2 binding to collagen sponge
Apply inside interbody cage to contain growth factor
Standard dose: 12 mg for single-level ALIF
Avoid anterior extrusion and posterior contact with neural elements
Counsel about retrograde ejaculation risk (2-5%)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not allowing adequate binding time (15 min)
✗Applying BMP directly to neural structures
✗Failing to counsel about retrograde ejaculation
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A patient develops severe swelling and dysphagia 48 hours after an ACDF where BMP was used. How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a BMP-related airway emergency. First, I would assess the airway immediately - if any stridor, desaturation, or respiratory distress, this is an emergency requiring urgent airway management, potentially including intubation or tracheostomy. If the airway is stable, I would admit for close observation with ICU/high dependency monitoring. I would not discharge until swelling is resolving. This complication is well-described with cervical BMP use, which is why the FDA issued a 2008 warning and BMP is contraindicated in the cervical spine. The inflammatory response can cause life-threatening swelling 2-14 days postoperatively. Treatment is supportive - steroids may help reduce swelling, but evidence is limited. If intubation is required, early tracheostomy may be needed if extubation is not possible within days.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Immediate airway assessment - emergency if stridor or respiratory distress
ICU admission for close monitoring if airway stable
BMP is contraindicated in cervical spine (FDA 2008 warning)
Swelling occurs 2-14 days postoperatively
Supportive treatment, consider steroids, may need tracheostomy
COMMON TRAPS
✗Discharging patient without adequate monitoring
✗Not recognizing this as a potential airway emergency
✗Not knowing that cervical BMP use is contraindicated
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"How do you assess fusion after a lumbar fusion with BMP?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Fusion assessment after lumbar fusion requires both clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clinically, I would assess for resolution of preoperative symptoms, absence of pain with provocative maneuvers, and functional improvement. Radiographically, I use serial imaging: plain radiographs can show evidence of bridging bone and absence of motion on flexion-extension views. However, CT scan is the gold standard for assessing solid fusion - I look for continuous trabecular bridging across the fusion site. With BMP, early postoperative radiographs may show osteolysis around the cage (paradoxical early resorption), which typically resolves as fusion progresses. I would obtain CT at 6-12 months postoperatively if there is clinical concern about pseudarthrosis or to confirm solid fusion before clearing the patient for unrestricted activity.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Clinical: symptom resolution, pain-free with motion
Radiographic: bridging bone, no motion on flexion-extension
CT scan is gold standard for confirming solid fusion
Early osteolysis with BMP typically resolves
CT at 6-12 months for definitive fusion assessment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Relying solely on plain radiographs for fusion assessment
✗Misinterpreting early BMP-related osteolysis as failure
✗Not obtaining CT when clinical suspicion of pseudarthrosis
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"What is the evidence for using BMP-2 in lumbar fusion?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The evidence for BMP-2 in lumbar fusion is nuanced. For ALIF at L4-S1, there is Level I evidence from the FDA approval trial showing non-inferiority to iliac crest autograft with fusion rates of 94-99%. This eliminates donor site morbidity. However, post-marketing surveillance and independent reviews, particularly the YODA Project in 2013, revealed that industry-sponsored trials underreported complications. Ectopic bone formation (10-30%), retrograde ejaculation (2-5% at L5-S1), and osteolysis are more common than initially reported. For posterior lumbar fusion, BMP is used off-label - meta-analyses suggest higher fusion rates than autograft but also higher complication rates. I use BMP selectively: in high-risk patients for nonunion, when avoiding autograft harvest is important, or for revision pseudarthrosis surgery. I always counsel patients about off-label use and complications.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
ALIF L4-S1: Level I evidence, FDA approved, 94-99% fusion
Posterior fusion: Off-label, higher fusion but higher complications
YODA Project: Independent review found underreported complications
Selective use: High-risk patients, avoiding autograft, revision surgery
Always counsel about off-label use and known complications
COMMON TRAPS
✗Claiming BMP has no complications or is universally beneficial
✗Not knowing about YODA Project and industry bias controversy
✗Using BMP routinely without considering cost-benefit
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"How would you justify the use of rhBMP-2 in a complex revision lumbar fusion in the Australian public health system?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
In the Australian public health system, I would need to justify BMP use based on clinical indication and cost-benefit. For a complex revision fusion, I would document: (1) failed previous fusion with pseudarthrosis confirmed on CT, (2) patient factors that increase nonunion risk (smoking history, diabetes, previous radiation), (3) inadequate local bone stock for autograft alone, and (4) discussion of alternatives and their limitations. I would seek hospital formulary approval, documenting the clinical rationale. The cost of BMP (approximately $5,000-10,000) must be weighed against the cost of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis, which can exceed $50,000 including hospital stay and rehabilitation. In appropriately selected high-risk revision cases, BMP use is cost-effective by improving first-time fusion rates. I would document informed consent including off-label status and known complications.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Document clinical justification: pseudarthrosis, risk factors, inadequate autograft
Seek hospital formulary approval with rationale
Cost-benefit: BMP cost vs revision surgery costs
Informed consent for off-label use and complications
Reserve for high-risk cases where benefit clear
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not understanding that public hospital use requires justification
✗Using BMP routinely without cost-benefit consideration
✗Not documenting informed consent for off-label use

GROWTH FACTORS IN BONE HEALING

High-Yield Exam Summary

BMP Family (Osteoinduction)

  • •BMP-2 and BMP-7 most potent osteoinductive factors (only induce ectopic bone)
  • •Urist 1965 discovery: DBM in muscle induces bone (true osteoinduction)
  • •Mechanism: BMP → BMPR-II → BMPR-I (ALK-2/3/6) → pSmad1/5/8 → Smad4 → Runx2
  • •rhBMP-2 FDA-approved: ALIF L4-S1 single level and open tibia fractures only
  • •Delivery: absorbable collagen sponge (ACS), typical dose 12mg for ALIF
  • •Serious complications: ectopic bone (10-30%), retrograde ejaculation (2-5%)
  • •Osteolysis, inflammatory swelling, wound complications
  • •OFF-LABEL CERVICAL USE: life-threatening airway swelling (FDA warning 2008)

TGF-β (Coupling and Proliferation)

  • •Most abundant growth factor in bone matrix (200 μg/kg bone)
  • •Biphasic: stimulates proliferation (early), inhibits differentiation (late)
  • •Key role in coupling: released during resorption, recruits MSCs to site
  • •Signals via Smad2/3 (vs BMP Smad1/5/8), both use Smad4 common mediator
  • •Platelets release TGF-β in fracture hematoma (initiates healing cascade)
  • •Secreted as latent complex (LAP), activated by proteases/pH/mechanical stress
  • •Without TGF-β coupling impaired: uncoupled remodeling leads to bone loss

VEGF (Angiogenesis-Osteogenesis Coupling)

  • •Essential for coupling angiogenesis to osteogenesis (no vessels = no bone)
  • •VEGF-A most important, binds VEGFR-2 on endothelial cells
  • •Secreted by hypertrophic chondrocytes to signal vascular invasion of soft callus
  • •Type H vessels (CD31-high, Emcn-high) at metaphysis and callus: pro-osteogenic
  • •Type H vessels deliver osteoprogenitors, support perivascular differentiation
  • •Bone forms where vessels penetrate (spatial-temporal coupling)
  • •Hypoxia → HIF-1α stabilization → VEGF transcription (100-fold increase)
  • •VEGF inhibition (anti-cancer drugs bevacizumab) impairs healing 50% in animals
  • •CLINICAL: Anti-VEGF therapy delays fracture healing in cancer patients

PDGF (Early Chemotaxis)

  • •Released from platelets immediately upon fracture (first growth factor)
  • •Peak concentration 24-48 hours in hematoma
  • •Chemotactic: recruits inflammatory cells and MSCs to fracture site
  • •Stimulates proliferation of osteoblasts, fibroblasts (mitogenic)
  • •Indirect angiogenesis (stimulates VEGF production by stromal cells)
  • •Dimeric protein (PDGF-AA, AB, BB), BB most potent
  • •Binds PDGFR-α/β → Ras-MAPK, PI3K-Akt signaling
  • •Clinical product: Augment Bone Graft (PDGF-BB + β-TCP) for foot/ankle fusion

FGF and IGF Families

  • •FGF-2 (bFGF): mesenchymal proliferation, angiogenesis, maintains progenitor pool
  • •FGF-18 (sprifermin): cartilage homeostasis, clinical trials for OA
  • •FGFR3 gain-of-function mutation: achondroplasia (inhibits chondrocyte proliferation)
  • •IGF-1: osteoblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, anti-apoptotic
  • •GH-IGF axis: GH stimulates liver and osteoblasts to produce IGF-1
  • •IGFBPs regulate bioavailability (IGFBP-3 most abundant)
  • •IGF-1 mediates most skeletal effects of growth hormone

Temporal Sequence

  • •Immediate (hours): Platelets release PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF from alpha granules
  • •24-48h: PDGF peak - recruits inflammatory cells and MSCs
  • •Days 1-7: TGF-β dominant, inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6)
  • •Days 7-21: BMP-2 peak (day 14-21), VEGF second peak, soft callus formation
  • •Weeks 2-6: BMPs and VEGF drive hard callus, Type H vessel invasion
  • •Months 2-12+: IGF-1, FGFs sustain remodeling, TGF-β couples resorption to formation
  • •Sequential overlapping waves, not discrete phases

Clinical Applications

  • •rhBMP-2 (Infuse): ALIF L4-S1, open tibia (FDA-approved), high efficacy but serious risks
  • •rhBMP-7 (OP-1): long bone nonunions (HDE), limited availability
  • •PDGF-BB: foot/ankle fusion (Augment), periodontal defects (GEM 21S)
  • •PRP: LOW EVIDENCE for bone healing, mixed for tendons, not recommended routinely
  • •BMC: very low MSC concentration (0.001-0.01%), limited evidence, no FDA approval
  • •Anti-VEGF drugs impair healing: avoid elective surgery in cancer patients on bevacizumab

Key Exam Points

  • •BMPs are ONLY growth factors that induce ectopic bone (true osteoinduction)
  • •TGF-β uses Smad2/3, BMPs use Smad1/5/8 (different R-Smads, share Smad4)
  • •VEGF coupling is essential: Type H vessels (not Type L) support osteogenesis
  • •Platelets are first source: fracture hematoma contains PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF
  • •Sequential expression: PDGF → TGF-β → BMPs → VEGF peak → IGFs/FGFs remodeling
  • •Hypoxia-HIF-1α-VEGF pathway drives angiogenesis in fracture healing
Quick Stats
Reading Time221 min
Related Topics

Articular Cartilage Structure and Function

Bending Moment Distribution in Fracture Fixation

Biceps Femoris Short Head Anatomy

Biofilm Formation in Orthopaedic Infections