Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Humeral Shaft Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Humeral Shaft Fractures

Comprehensive guide to humeral shaft fractures - AO/OTA classification, radial nerve palsy assessment, Holstein-Lewis fracture, and operative vs non-operative management for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES

Non-Operative Success Rate High | Radial Nerve at Risk | Functional Bracing Gold Standard

3-5%Of all fractures
12-18%Radial nerve palsy rate
90%+Non-operative union rate
20°/30°Acceptable angulation/shortening

AO/OTA CLASSIFICATION (12-A/B/C)

12-A
PatternSimple (spiral, oblique, transverse)
TreatmentFunctional bracing usually
12-B
PatternWedge (spiral, bending, comminuted)
TreatmentBracing or ORIF
12-C
PatternComplex/Comminuted
TreatmentOften surgical

Critical Must-Knows

  • Functional bracing achieves over 90% union with acceptable alignment in most cases
  • Radial nerve spirals around posterior humerus - vulnerable at junction of middle and distal thirds
  • Holstein-Lewis fracture: Distal third spiral fracture with high radial nerve palsy risk
  • Acceptable alignment: under 20° anterior angulation, under 30° varus/valgus, less than 3cm shortening, under 15° rotation
  • Primary radial nerve palsy (at injury): observe 3-4 months before exploration

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    70% of radial nerve palsies recover spontaneously without exploration
  • "
    Secondary palsy after manipulation = urgent exploration
  • "
    Pendulum exercises begin immediately with functional brace
  • "
    Antegrade IMN avoids radial nerve but risks rotator cuff injury

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

a) Patient with osseous metastases from lung carcinoma. Pathological fracture of proximal humerus diaphysis. Expected survival < 6 months. Plate fixation with cement. b) Patient with osseous metast
Click to expand
a) Patient with osseous metastases from lung carcinoma. Pathological fracture of proximal humerus diaphysis. Expected survival < 6 months. Plate fiCredit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
a) – Initial radiograph showing transverse fracture of mid diaphysis of left humerus.b) – Immediate postoperative radiograph AP & lateral views – showing six holed LCP and three screws on either s
Click to expand
a) – Initial radiograph showing transverse fracture of mid diaphysis of left humerus.b) – Immediate postoperative radiograph AP & lateral views – Credit: Metikala S et al. via J Orthop Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Clinical example of humerus fracture healing.
Click to expand
Clinical example of humerus fracture healing.Credit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Initial immobilisation with the splint.
Click to expand
Initial immobilisation with the splint.Credit: Matsunaga FT et al. via Trials via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Humeral shaft fracture case series with intramedullary nailing
Click to expand
Comprehensive case series demonstrating various humeral shaft fracture patterns treated with intramedullary nailing. Multiple fracture configurations shown including spiral, transverse, and comminuted patterns with pre-operative and post-operative radiographs demonstrating successful union.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Critical Humeral Shaft Fracture Exam Points

Radial Nerve Assessment

Document wrist/finger extension and sensation before any manipulation. Primary palsy = observe, Secondary palsy post-manipulation = explore. Nerve crosses posterior humerus at spiral groove.

Functional Bracing

Gold standard non-operative management. Humeral brace with adjustable straps. Allows elbow and shoulder motion. Gravity alignment maintains reduction.

Surgical Indications

Polytrauma, open fractures, vascular injury, floating elbow, bilateral fractures, pathological fractures. Also consider for unacceptable alignment and patient factors (obesity).

Operative Options

ORIF with plate vs IMN. Plates preferred for distal fractures (avoid rotator cuff). IMN for proximal/middle shaft. MIPO technique reduces iatrogenic nerve injury.

At a Glance Treatment Decision Guide

Quick Decision Guide

Fracture PatternNerve StatusKey FactorTreatment
Simple, acceptable alignmentIntactCompliant patientFunctional brace - gold standard
Simple fracturePrimary radial palsyClosed injuryFunctional brace + observe nerve 3-4 months
Any patternSecondary palsy post-manipulationNew deficit after reductionUrgent ORIF + nerve exploration
Holstein-Lewis (distal spiral)With or without palsyHigh nerve risk locationStrong consideration for ORIF
Open/Polytrauma/Floating elbowAny statusAssociated injuriesORIF or IMN mandatory

Key Mnemonics

Mnemonic

WESTRadial Nerve Motor Testing

W
Wrist extension
ECRL, ECRB - radial nerve proper
E
Elbow extension (triceps)
May be spared if injury distal to branches
S
Supination (of forearm)
Supinator muscle - posterior interosseous nerve
T
Thumb and finger extension
EPL, EDC - posterior interosseous nerve

Memory Hook:WEST - Wrist drop is the classic finding! Test wrist extension against gravity, if absent = radial nerve palsy.

Mnemonic

STOP BRACESurgical Indications for Humeral Shaft

S
Segmental fractures
Multiple fracture levels = poor bracing
T
Transverse pattern at isthmus
Narrow canal, poor contact
O
Open fractures
Require debridement and stable fixation
P
Polytrauma/Pathological
Need early mobilization, impending fractures
B
Bilateral fractures
Cannot use crutches with both arms braced
R
Radial nerve secondary palsy
After manipulation = nerve exploration
A
Arterial injury (vascular)
Brachial artery injury requires fixation
C
Cannot tolerate brace
Obesity, skin issues, non-compliance
E
Extended joints (floating elbow)
Ipsilateral forearm fracture

Memory Hook:STOP the BRACE when surgery is needed - these are your absolute and relative surgical indications!

Mnemonic

20-30-3-15Acceptable Angulation (Rule of 20-30-3-15)

20
20 degrees sagittal angulation
Anterior/posterior bowing acceptable
30
30 degrees coronal angulation
Varus/valgus acceptable (hidden by shoulder)
3
3cm shortening
Well tolerated functionally
15
15 degrees rotation
Acceptable rotational malunion

Memory Hook:20-30-3-15: The shoulder hides angulation well, making humeral shaft fractures forgiving for non-operative management!

Mnemonic

HoLLyHolstein-Lewis Fracture Features

Ho
Holstein-Lewis
Named after Holstein and Lewis (1963)
L
Lateral spiral distal third
Distal third spiral oblique fracture
L
Lateral intermuscular septum
Nerve tethered here at spiral groove
y
High radial palsy risk
22-32% nerve palsy rate at this level

Memory Hook:HoLLy Hurts the Radial nerve! Distal third spiral = high risk for nerve injury = consider ORIF.

Overview and Epidemiology

Clinical Significance

Humeral shaft fractures are unique in that non-operative management achieves excellent outcomes in the majority of cases. The shoulder and elbow joints compensate well for residual angulation and shortening, making functional bracing the gold standard treatment.

Demographics

  • Bimodal distribution: Young males (high-energy), elderly females (low-energy falls)
  • Male predominance in working age (sports, MVA)
  • Female predominance in elderly (osteoporotic)
  • Mean age: 45-55 years

Mechanism

  • Direct blow: Transverse fractures (50%)
  • Indirect/Torsion: Spiral/oblique fractures (50%)
  • Falls (most common overall)
  • Motor vehicle accidents
  • Sports (throwing, arm wrestling)

Fracture Distribution by Location

LocationFrequencyCommon PatternNerve at Risk
Proximal third30%Spiral/ObliqueAxillary nerve (rare)
Middle third60%Transverse/SpiralRadial nerve (spiral groove)
Distal third10%Spiral (Holstein-Lewis)Radial nerve (highest risk)

Anatomy and Pathophysiology

The Radial Nerve Course

The radial nerve is the most commonly injured nerve in humeral shaft fractures. It enters the posterior compartment from medial to lateral, wrapping around the posterior humerus in the spiral groove at the junction of the middle and distal thirds. Here it is tethered by the lateral intermuscular septum.

Intraoperative view of radial nerve during humeral shaft surgery
Click to expand
Intraoperative photograph demonstrating the radial nerve (indicated by arrows) during surgical approach to a humeral shaft fracture. The nerve must be identified and protected throughout the procedure to prevent iatrogenic injury.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Muscular Deforming Forces by Fracture Level

Fracture LevelProximal FragmentDistal FragmentResulting Deformity
Above pectoralis major insertionAbduction, ER (rotator cuff)Adduction (pec major, deltoid)Apex lateral angulation
Between pec major and deltoidAdduction (pec major)Abduction (deltoid)Apex medial angulation
Below deltoid insertionAbduction (deltoid)Proximal pull (biceps, triceps)Shortening, variable angulation

Key Anatomical Landmarks

  • Surgical neck: Transition to shaft (axillary nerve)
  • Deltoid insertion: V-shaped, mid-shaft lateral
  • Spiral groove: Posterior, middle-distal junction
  • Supracondylar ridge: Transition to distal humerus

Radial Nerve Anatomy

  • Enters arm in axilla (posterior cord)
  • Supplies triceps proximally
  • Spiral groove: 14-20cm from lateral epicondyle
  • Pierces lateral intermuscular septum at distal third
  • Divides into PIN and superficial radial at elbow

Exam Trap: Radial Nerve Branches

The radial nerve supplies the triceps before entering the spiral groove. Therefore, triceps function may be preserved despite radial nerve injury at the spiral groove level. Always test wrist and finger extension - these are the key clinical findings for radial nerve palsy.

Classification Systems

AO/OTA Classification (12-A/B/C)

TypeDescriptionSubgroupsTreatment Tendency
12-A (Simple)Two fragments, over 90% cortical contactA1: Spiral, A2: Oblique (over 30°), A3: Transverse (under 30°)Functional bracing
12-B (Wedge)Three fragments, contact between main fragments possibleB1: Spiral wedge, B2: Bending wedge, B3: Fragmentary wedgeBracing or surgery
12-C (Complex)Multiple fragments, no contact between main fragmentsC1: Spiral, C2: Segmental, C3: Irregular comminutedUsually surgical

Key Point

AO/OTA classification determines complexity and comminution. Simple fractures (A) have excellent outcomes with functional bracing. Complex fractures (C) often require surgical stabilization.

Descriptive Classification

PatternMechanismStabilityNerve Risk
TransverseDirect blowUnstable in braceModerate
ObliqueBending/torsionVariableModerate
SpiralTorsionMore stableHigher (distal)
ComminutedHigh energyUnstableVariable
SegmentalHigh energyVery unstableHigh

Holstein-Lewis Pattern

Distal third spiral oblique fracture pattern. Named pattern due to high radial nerve palsy rate (22-32%). The sharp proximal spike can lacerate or entrap the radial nerve as it passes through the lateral intermuscular septum.

Location-Based Classification

LocationBoundariesClinical Relevance
Proximal thirdSurgical neck to deltoid insertionMuscular forces cause abduction/ER of proximal fragment
Middle thirdDeltoid insertion to supracondylar regionMost common site, radial nerve at risk posteriorly
Distal thirdSupracondylar regionHolstein-Lewis pattern, highest nerve risk, consider ORIF

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Mechanism: Direct blow vs torsion vs fall
  • Hand dominance: Functional implications
  • Occupation: Manual vs sedentary work
  • Comorbidities: Diabetes, smoking, osteoporosis
  • Previous injury: Pathological fracture concern

Examination

  • Look: Deformity, swelling, bruising, skin condition
  • Feel: Point tenderness, crepitus, neurovascular status
  • Move: Limited by pain, test shoulder and elbow
  • Neurovascular: Radial nerve critical, brachial artery

Radial Nerve Examination is MANDATORY

Document radial nerve function before and after any intervention. Test: wrist extension against gravity, finger MCP extension, thumb extension (hitchhiker), sensation first dorsal web space. Record in notes clearly.

Radial Nerve Assessment

TestTechniqueFindingInterpretation
Wrist extensionExtend wrist against resistanceWrist drop if absentRadial nerve palsy - most reliable sign
Finger MCP extensionExtend fingers at MCP against resistanceCannot extend MCPsPIN involvement
Thumb extensionExtend thumb (hitchhiker sign)Cannot extend thumbEPL - PIN involvement
Sensation first web spaceLight touch dorsal first webNumbness/decreasedSuperficial radial nerve
Triceps functionExtend elbow against resistanceUsually preservedBranches given before spiral groove

Primary vs Secondary Palsy

Primary palsy (present at injury): Usually neurapraxia from stretch/contusion. Observe for 3-4 months - 70% recover spontaneously. Secondary palsy (develops after manipulation/reduction): Suggests nerve entrapment in fracture site - warrants urgent exploration.

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

EssentialPlain Radiographs

AP and lateral of entire humerus. Must include shoulder and elbow joints. Assess fracture pattern, displacement, angulation, and any articular involvement.

ConsiderFull-Length Views

Include shoulder and elbow joints on separate views if not fully visualized. Rule out associated injuries (floating elbow, shoulder dislocation).

Complex CasesCT Scan

Indicated for: articular extension, preoperative planning for comminuted fractures, pathological fracture workup.

Special SituationsAdditional Imaging

MRI: pathological fracture evaluation, soft tissue injury. Angiography: if vascular injury suspected (rare).

Radiographic Assessment

ParameterWhat to AssessNormal/AcceptableAction if Abnormal
Fracture patternSimple vs comminutedSimple preferred for bracingComminuted may need surgery
Sagittal angulationAP viewless than 20 degreesReduction needed if over 20°
Coronal angulationLateral viewless than 30 degreesReduction needed if over 30°
ShorteningCompare with normalless than 3cmUsually acceptable
Joint involvementShoulder and elbowNoneCT if suspected

Holstein-Lewis Recognition

Look specifically for distal third spiral oblique fracture pattern on radiographs. This is the Holstein-Lewis fracture with high radial nerve palsy risk. Even with intact nerve function, consider lower threshold for surgical intervention.

Humeral shaft fracture lateral radiograph showing spiral oblique pattern
Click to expand
Lateral radiograph demonstrating spiral oblique humeral shaft fracture (arrows indicate fracture lines). This distal third pattern is consistent with Holstein-Lewis fracture configuration, which carries high risk (22-32%) of radial nerve palsy.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for humeral shaft fractures
Click to expand
Management algorithm for humeral shaft fractures. Primary decision points are alignment and neurovascular status. Most closed fractures are managed with functional bracing.Credit: OrthoVellum

Non-Operative Management - Functional Bracing

Gold standard for most humeral shaft fractures. Pioneered by Sarmiento, achieves over 90% union rate.

Functional Bracing Protocol

0-1 weekAcute Phase

Coaptation splint (sugar tong) or U-slab. Sling for comfort. Ice, elevation. Begin pendulum exercises immediately if pain allows.

1-2 weeksBrace Application

Convert to prefabricated humeral brace once swelling subsides. Circumferential compression with adjustable straps. Allows elbow and shoulder motion.

2+ weeksActive Mobilization

Active shoulder and elbow ROM. Pendulum exercises 4-6 times daily. Gravity alignment maintains reduction. Wean sling.

Weekly x 2-3Radiographic Follow-up

Weekly X-rays initially to ensure maintained alignment. Then every 2-4 weeks until union (usually 8-12 weeks).

8-12 weeksBrace Weaning

Wean brace once clinical and radiographic union. Progressive strengthening. Full activity by 4-6 months.

Functional Bracing Mechanism

The brace provides hydraulic compression via soft tissue containment. This, combined with gravity, aligns the fracture. The key is early motion - muscle contraction maintains alignment and promotes healing.

Success Factors

  • Compliant patient
  • Simple fracture pattern
  • Acceptable initial alignment
  • Early active motion
  • Weekly X-ray follow-up initially

Poor Brace Candidates

  • Obesity (poor soft tissue compression)
  • Skin problems (burns, dermatitis)
  • Non-compliance
  • Transverse fractures at narrow isthmus
  • Segmental fractures

Indications for Surgery

IndicationRationaleUrgency
Open fractureContamination, soft tissue injuryEmergency
Vascular injuryLimb threateningEmergency
Secondary radial nerve palsyNerve entrapment in fractureUrgent
Floating elbowIpsilateral forearm fractureSemi-urgent
PolytraumaEarly mobilization requiredSemi-urgent
Bilateral fracturesCannot use bilateral bracesSemi-urgent
Pathological fractureImpending fracture or stabilizationElective-urgent
Unacceptable alignmentover 20° sagittal, over 30° coronal, greater than 3cm shortElective
Patient factorsObesity, skin issues, non-complianceElective

Holstein-Lewis Consideration

Distal third spiral fractures with or without radial nerve palsy warrant strong consideration for ORIF. The nerve is at high risk, and surgical fixation allows direct visualization and protection of the radial nerve.

Surgical Technique

Open Reduction Internal Fixation - Plating

Humeral shaft fracture plate fixation AP and lateral views
Click to expand
AP and lateral radiographs demonstrating humeral shaft fracture fixation with compression plating. The plate is applied to the lateral/anterolateral surface with adequate screw purchase above and below the fracture (minimum 6 cortices each side).Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine with arm on arm board (anterolateral approach)
  • Lateral decubitus or prone for posterior approach
  • Beach chair for proximal fractures

Anterolateral Approach:

  • Incision along lateral border of biceps
  • Develop interval between brachialis (musculocutaneous) and brachioradialis (radial)
  • Radial nerve runs between these muscles - identify and protect
  • Plate applied anterolaterally on flat humerus

Posterior Approach:

  • Midline posterior incision
  • Split triceps in midline or elevate medial and lateral heads
  • Radial nerve identified in spiral groove, protected
  • Plate applied to flat posterior surface

Plate Choice:

  • 4.5mm narrow LCP or broad LCP
  • Minimum 3-4 screws (6-8 cortices) each side of fracture
  • Compression plate for simple patterns
  • Bridge plating for comminution

MIPO Technique

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis uses small incisions proximally and distally with submuscular plate passage. Reduces soft tissue stripping and theoretical nerve injury risk. Requires fluoroscopy.

Intramedullary Nailing

Humeral shaft fracture with intramedullary nail fixation
Click to expand
AP and lateral radiographs showing humeral shaft fracture treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing. Note the proximal interlocking screws through the greater tuberosity and distal interlocking maintaining rotational stability.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Entry Point Options:

  • Antegrade (proximal): Greater tuberosity lateral entry
  • Retrograde (distal): Olecranon fossa entry (rare)

Antegrade Technique:

  • Beach chair or lateral position
  • Entry at greater tuberosity, slightly lateral to articular surface
  • Guide wire across fracture
  • Ream to appropriate size
  • Insert nail with rotational alignment maintained
  • Proximal and distal interlocking

Fracture Reduction:

  • May require open reduction of fracture
  • Mini-open approach to pass guide wire
  • Blocking screws for angular correction

Avoiding Cuff Damage:

  • Entry lateral to articular margin
  • Bury nail below bone surface
  • Some surgeons repair cuff over entry point

Antegrade Entry Point

The entry point is critical. Too medial damages supraspinatus and cuff. Use lateral greater tuberosity entry or a medial entry (through tendon with repair). Shoulder pain remains problematic.

Avoiding Complications

Radial Nerve Protection:

  • Always identify nerve before plating mid-shaft fractures
  • Nerve crosses posterior to anterior at junction of middle and distal thirds
  • Mark its position and protect throughout
  • Consider preoperative EMG if neurological deficit present

Malreduction:

  • Verify rotation clinically (compare to other side)
  • Check alignment with fluoroscopy in two planes
  • Varus malreduction is common - plate applied too anteriorly

Hardware Failure:

  • Use adequate plate length (minimum 6 cortices each side)
  • Consider locking screws in osteoporotic bone
  • Bridge don't compress comminuted segments

Infection Prevention:

  • Perioperative antibiotics
  • Minimize soft tissue stripping
  • Careful hemostasis

Entry Point Problems (IMN):

  • Too medial entry damages cuff
  • Bury nail to reduce impingement
  • Consider plating if poor nail trajectory

Complication avoidance requires careful surgical planning and meticulous technique.

Complications

Complications and Management

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Radial nerve palsy12-18% (primary)Distal third, spiral, Holstein-LewisObserve primary, explore secondary
Nonunion2-10%Transverse pattern, distraction, non-complianceORIF + bone graft
MalunionVariableNon-operative with poor follow-upUsually well tolerated, osteotomy if symptomatic
Shoulder stiffnessCommon initiallyProlonged immobilization, poor complianceEarly motion, physiotherapy
Infection (surgical)1-3%Open fractures, poor soft tissuesDebridement, antibiotics, revision
Hardware failure2-5%Early loading, inadequate fixationRevision fixation
Iatrogenic nerve injury2-5% (surgical)Posterior approach, ORIFCareful dissection, MIPO technique

Radial Nerve Palsy Management

Management Algorithm

Primary palsy (at injury): 70% recover spontaneously. Observe for 3-4 months with clinical and EMG monitoring. If no recovery by 4 months, explore. Secondary palsy (post-manipulation): Urgent exploration - nerve likely trapped in fracture site.

Primary vs Secondary Radial Nerve Palsy

FeaturePrimary PalsySecondary Palsy
TimingPresent at injuryDevelops after manipulation/surgery
MechanismStretch/contusion (neurapraxia)Entrapment in fracture site
Spontaneous recovery70% within 3-4 monthsUnlikely without exploration
ManagementObserve, wrist splint, EMG at 3-4 weeksUrgent surgical exploration

Management of Primary Radial Nerve Palsy

Day 0Immediate

Document findings clearly. Wrist cock-up splint to maintain function. Proceed with non-operative management if otherwise indicated.

3-4 weeksEarly

Baseline EMG/NCS to confirm nerve injury type and level. Monitor clinically for Tinel sign progression (sign of regeneration).

6-8 weeksIntermediate

Repeat EMG if no clinical recovery. Look for reinnervation potentials. Continue monitoring.

3-4 monthsDecision Point

If no clinical or EMG recovery, plan surgical exploration. Nerve grafting may be required if gap identified.

12-18 monthsLate

If nerve recovery incomplete, consider tendon transfers (PT to ECRB, FCR to EDC, PL to EPL).

Tendon Transfer Options

If radial nerve does not recover: PT to ECRB (wrist extension), FCR to EDC (finger extension), PL to EPL (thumb extension). These restore functional wrist and finger extension.

Nonunion Risk Factors

Transverse fracture pattern has higher nonunion risk with functional bracing (2-10% vs 5% or less for oblique/spiral). The narrow isthmus and transverse orientation provide poor cortical contact. Consider primary ORIF for transverse fractures at the narrow diaphyseal portion.

Humeral shaft nonunion treated with orthogonal double plating
Click to expand
Humeral shaft fracture nonunion case series: (a) persistent nonunion with plate failure, (b) revision with orthogonal double plating technique (90-90 plating), (c) subsequent union achieved. Double plating provides enhanced stability for challenging nonunions.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Shoulder Stiffness Prevention

Pendulum exercises from day one are critical. The key to successful functional bracing is EARLY MOTION. Shoulder stiffness is a preventable complication with appropriate rehabilitation.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-ORIF Rehabilitation

ProtectionWeek 0-2

Sling for comfort. Wound care. Gentle pendulum exercises. No active shoulder elevation against gravity.

Early MotionWeek 2-6

Active-assisted shoulder ROM. Active elbow ROM. Gentle strengthening begins at 4 weeks if stable fixation.

Progressive LoadingWeek 6-12

Progressive resistive exercises. Wean sling. Radiographic union usually evident by 8-12 weeks.

Return to Activity3-6 months

Full activity when clinically and radiographically healed. Sport-specific training as appropriate.

Post-IMN Rehabilitation

ProtectionWeek 0-2

Sling. May have more shoulder pain with antegrade nailing. Gentle pendulum exercises.

Progressive MotionWeek 2-6

Active ROM as tolerated. May have slower shoulder recovery due to entry point issues.

StrengtheningWeek 6-12

Progressive resistance training. Address any shoulder symptoms from entry point.

Hardware Considerations3+ months

Proximal locking screws may require removal if prominent/symptomatic. Usually wait for union before any hardware removal.

Shoulder Pain After Antegrade Nailing

15-30% report persistent shoulder symptoms after antegrade humeral nailing. Caused by rotator cuff injury from entry point, prominent proximal hardware, or adhesive capsulitis. Consider nail removal after union if symptomatic.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic Factors

FactorImpactNotes
Fracture patternSignificantSimple patterns do well with bracing; transverse at risk
Patient complianceCritical for bracingNon-compliance leads to malunion/nonunion
Radial nerve statusImportantPrimary palsy usually recovers; secondary needs surgery
Associated injuriesVariablePolytrauma patients may need surgical fixation
SmokingNegativeHigher nonunion rates
DiabetesNegativeDelayed healing, higher complications

Plate vs Nail Outcomes

Meta-analyses show similar union rates for plate vs nail (both over 95%). However, plating has lower reoperation rates and less shoulder problems. Nailing is faster but associated with more shoulder pain (antegrade) or elbow issues (retrograde).

Evidence Base

Sarmiento Functional Bracing Study

III
📚 Sarmiento et al.
Key Findings:
  • 922 humeral shaft fractures treated with functional bracing
  • 98% union rate achieved
  • Mean time to union 10 weeks
  • Acceptable outcomes with up to 20° sagittal and 30° coronal angulation
Clinical Implication: Functional bracing is effective for most humeral shaft fractures. Sets acceptable alignment parameters that are now standard of care.
Source: JBJS Am. 2000;82(4):478-486

Plate vs Nail Meta-Analysis

I
📚 Heineman et al.
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs comparing plate and nail fixation
  • Similar union rates for plate (94%) vs nail (92%)
  • Plating had lower reoperation rate (7% vs 22%)
  • Fewer shoulder problems with plating
Clinical Implication: Plate fixation preferred over nailing for most cases due to lower complication profile. Nail reserved for specific indications.
Source: Injury. 2010;41(12):1168-1178

Radial Nerve Palsy Natural History

III
📚 Shao et al.
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 4517 fractures
  • Primary radial nerve palsy in 11.8%
  • Spontaneous recovery in 70.7%
  • No significant difference between exploration and observation for closed fractures
Clinical Implication: Primary radial nerve palsy should be observed initially. Exploration reserved for open fractures and secondary palsy.
Source: J Trauma. 2005;58(5):1021-1025

Holstein-Lewis Fracture Nerve Injury

IV
📚 Holstein A, Lewis GB
Key Findings:
  • Original description of distal third spiral oblique fracture
  • High radial nerve palsy rate (22-32%)
  • Nerve trapped between proximal spike and lateral intermuscular septum
Clinical Implication: Holstein-Lewis pattern requires high index of suspicion for nerve injury. Lower threshold for surgical exploration/fixation.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:1382-1388

ORIF vs Functional Bracing RCT

I
📚 Matsunaga et al.
Key Findings:
  • RCT of 110 patients
  • ORIF showed faster union (3 vs 5 months) and earlier return to work
  • No difference in final outcomes
  • Higher cost with surgery
Clinical Implication: Surgery provides faster recovery but similar final outcomes. Consider patient factors (occupation, preference) in decision-making.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(18):1510-1517

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Initial Assessment and Classification

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents after falling off a ladder onto his outstretched arm. He has obvious deformity of his right upper arm and cannot extend his wrist or fingers. X-rays show a spiral fracture of the distal third of the humerus. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This patient has a **distal third spiral humeral shaft fracture** - the classic **Holstein-Lewis fracture** pattern - with an associated **radial nerve palsy**. **Assessment:** I would perform a thorough neurovascular examination and document the radial nerve deficit including wrist extension, finger MCP extension, thumb extension, and sensation in the first dorsal web space. I would also document ulnar and median nerve function as baseline. **Classification:** This is a distal third spiral fracture - the Holstein-Lewis pattern - which has the highest rate of radial nerve palsy among humeral shaft fractures at 22-32%. The distal fragment typically displaces proximally and medially, and the nerve can be injured by the sharp proximal fracture spike. **Management:** The key question is whether to explore the radial nerve. This is a **primary nerve palsy** occurring at the time of injury. The evidence supports **initial observation** for primary palsies in closed fractures, with 70-90% recovering spontaneously within 3-4 months. My management would be: - **Closed treatment** with functional bracing if acceptable alignment can be achieved - **Serial EMG/NCS** starting at 6 weeks to monitor for reinnervation - If no recovery by **4 months**, proceed to nerve exploration - **If surgical fixation is indicated for other reasons** (e.g., failure of closed reduction, polytrauma), I would explore the nerve at the same time
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Document radial nerve palsy (wrist drop, finger extension, sensation dorsal first web)
Recognize Holstein-Lewis fracture pattern (distal third spiral)
Primary palsy at injury = observe initially unless open or other surgical indications
This pattern has high radial nerve palsy rate (22-32%)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to explore the nerve for primary palsy in closed fracture
✗Not recognizing Holstein-Lewis pattern and its significance
✗Forgetting to document nerve status before manipulation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Would you treat this non-operatively or surgically? Why?"
"If you choose surgery, how would you approach this fracture?"
"When would you explore the radial nerve?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Decision-Making

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old woman sustains a closed transverse humeral shaft fracture at the mid-diaphysis in a motorcycle accident. She also has a closed tibial shaft fracture. Her radial nerve is intact. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is a **polytrauma patient** with multiple long bone fractures requiring a coordinated management approach. **Key Considerations:** The combination of humeral shaft and tibial shaft fractures provides a clear **relative indication for surgical fixation** of the humerus. Several factors support operative treatment: - **Polytrauma** requiring early mobilization - **Transverse fracture pattern** at the mid-diaphysis (isthmus) which has higher nonunion rates with bracing - Intact radial nerve status documented - Need for upper limb function to assist with mobility given the lower limb injury **Surgical Planning:** I would favour **plate fixation** over intramedullary nailing for this mid-shaft location. My approach would be the **anterolateral approach**: - Patient positioned supine on a radiolucent table - Interval between biceps and brachialis developed - The radial nerve identified and protected where it crosses from posterior to anterior through the lateral intermuscular septum - Broad 4.5mm DCP or anatomic LCP applied **Sequencing:** I would coordinate with the trauma team. Typically, I would address the humeral shaft fixation first (if stable patient) as it can be performed supine and facilitates upper limb function for subsequent mobilization. The tibia would then be nailed in the same sitting or staged based on patient condition. **Nerve Protection:** I would identify the radial nerve throughout the approach and protect it with vessel loops, ensuring direct visualization during drilling and screw placement.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Polytrauma = relative indication for fixation of humeral shaft
Transverse pattern at isthmus has higher nonunion risk with bracing
Early stabilization allows mobilization (damage control orthopaedics)
Plate fixation preferred (anterolateral approach) vs IMN
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not considering polytrauma as indication for fixation
✗Ignoring tibial fracture in management plan
✗Choosing retrograde nail which requires positioning issues
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What approach would you use for plating?"
"How would you identify and protect the radial nerve?"
"Would you prefer antegrade nail in this situation? Why or why not?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complication Management

EXAMINER

"You are called to see a 40-year-old man in ED who had a closed humeral shaft fracture reduced in a backslab by the junior doctor. He now cannot extend his wrist or fingers - he had normal function before the reduction. What is your management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Thank you. This is an **urgent situation**. The key finding is that this patient had **normal radial nerve function before reduction** and now has a complete palsy. This is a **secondary radial nerve palsy** and my management differs completely from primary palsies. **Critical Distinction:** Unlike primary palsy (present at time of injury) which can be observed, **secondary palsy occurring after manipulation requires urgent surgical exploration**. The nerve is almost certainly entrapped in the fracture site or has been lacerated by the fracture fragments during the reduction maneuver. **Immediate Management:** 1. Document the neurological examination including complete motor and sensory testing 2. Inform the patient and family of the complication and the need for urgent surgery 3. Consent for **urgent open reduction, internal fixation, and radial nerve exploration** 4. Book emergency theatre **Intraoperative Expectations:** I would use an **anterolateral approach** providing excellent exposure of both the fracture and the radial nerve. Likely findings include: - Nerve entrapped in fracture site - Nerve compressed under or between bone fragments - Less commonly, laceration by sharp fracture spike **If nerve is in continuity** but contused, I would release it from entrapment, fix the fracture with plate fixation, and observe for recovery. **If there is a nerve transection**, I would perform primary repair if possible or mark the nerve ends for delayed nerve grafting (sural nerve graft typically) at 3-4 weeks when inflammation settles. **Key Point:** I would **not wait for EMG/NCS** - this is a clinical diagnosis requiring immediate intervention.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
This is SECONDARY radial nerve palsy - urgent exploration required
Nerve likely entrapped in fracture site during reduction
Cannot observe - high likelihood of nerve damage without intervention
Proceed to urgent ORIF with nerve exploration
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating as primary palsy and observing
✗Waiting for EMG/NCS before acting
✗Not examining for secondary palsy before patient leaves ED
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you find intraoperatively?"
"If the nerve is in continuity but contused, what would you do?"
"If there is a nerve gap requiring grafting, what are your options?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy Question

Q: At what level does the radial nerve cross the posterior humerus in the spiral groove? A: The junction of the middle and distal thirds, approximately 14-20cm from the lateral epicondyle. Here it is tethered by the lateral intermuscular septum.

Classification Question

Q: What is a Holstein-Lewis fracture? A: A distal third spiral oblique fracture of the humerus with high radial nerve palsy rate (22-32%). The sharp proximal spike can trap or lacerate the radial nerve at the lateral intermuscular septum.

Management Question

Q: What are the acceptable angulation limits for humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively? A: Less than 20° sagittal (AP) angulation, less than 30° coronal (varus/valgus), less than 3cm shortening, less than 15° rotation. The shoulder compensates well for these deformities.

Nerve Question

Q: A patient develops wrist drop after manipulation of a humeral shaft fracture. What is your management? A: This is secondary radial nerve palsy - the nerve is likely trapped in the fracture. Urgent exploration is required. Do not observe as you would for primary palsy.

Treatment Question

Q: What is the expected spontaneous recovery rate for primary radial nerve palsy in closed humeral shaft fractures? A: 70% recover spontaneously within 3-4 months. Observe with wrist splint and EMG monitoring. Explore if no recovery by 4 months.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Australian Data

  • Common ED presentation (21/100,000)
  • Bimodal: young males, elderly females
  • Functional bracing mainstay of treatment
  • Plating preferred over nailing when surgery indicated

RACS/AOA Guidelines

  • Competency expected in non-operative and operative management
  • Clear documentation of radial nerve status mandatory
  • Informed consent must include nerve injury discussion
  • Orthopaedic exam commonly tests radial nerve assessment and management

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation requirements:

  • Document radial nerve function before AND after any manipulation
  • Record complete motor (wrist, finger, thumb extension) and sensory (dorsal first web) exam
  • Document discussion of treatment options including functional bracing vs surgery
  • Informed consent for surgery must include: infection, nonunion, nerve injury (especially iatrogenic), shoulder stiffness (IMN), need for hardware removal
  • If radial palsy present: document as primary vs secondary and management plan

Consent for Humeral Shaft ORIF

Specific risks to discuss: Radial nerve injury (iatrogenic 2-5%), infection, nonunion, hardware failure/irritation, need for bone grafting, shoulder stiffness. For IMN: add rotator cuff injury and shoulder pain (15-30%).

HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Radial nerve in spiral groove at middle-distal third junction
  • •Nerve tethered by lateral intermuscular septum
  • •Triceps branches given BEFORE spiral groove (usually spared)
  • •Muscular deforming forces vary by fracture level

Classification

  • •AO/OTA: 12-A (simple), B (wedge), C (complex)
  • •Holstein-Lewis: distal third spiral = high radial palsy risk
  • •Location: proximal (30%), middle (60%), distal (10%)
  • •Pattern: transverse (direct blow), spiral (torsion)

Acceptable Alignment (20-30-3-15)

  • •under 20° sagittal (AP) angulation
  • •under 30° coronal (varus/valgus) angulation
  • •less than 3cm shortening
  • •under 15° rotation

Treatment Algorithm

  • •Most fractures: Functional bracing (over 90% union)
  • •STOP BRACE indications: Segmental, Transverse isthmus, Open, Polytrauma, Bilateral, Radial 2° palsy, Arterial injury, Cannot tolerate, Extended joints (floating elbow)
  • •Plate preferred over nail (less shoulder pain, lower reop rate)
  • •MIPO technique reduces iatrogenic nerve injury

Radial Nerve Palsy

  • •Primary palsy: observe 3-4 months, 70% recover
  • •Secondary palsy (post-manipulation): URGENT exploration
  • •Test: wrist extension, finger MCP extension, thumb extension
  • •Tendon transfers if no recovery: PT-ECRB, FCR-EDC, PL-EPL
Quick Stats
Reading Time115 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures