Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

Β© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Intervertebral Disc Biology

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Intervertebral Disc Biology

Comprehensive overview of intervertebral disc anatomy, biomechanics, nutrition, and degeneration for Orthopaedic examination

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

INTERVERTEBRAL DISC BIOLOGY

Nucleus Pulposus | Annulus Fibrosus | Endplates | Nutrition | Degeneration

80%water in nucleus pulposus
15-20concentric lamellae in annulus
30Β°fiber angle alternates
Noblood supply after age 20

PFIRRMANN CLASSIFICATION OF DISC DEGENERATION

Grade I
PatternHomogeneous bright white nucleus
TreatmentNormal disc
Grade II
PatternInhomogeneous with horizontal band
TreatmentEarly degeneration
Grade III
PatternInhomogeneous gray nucleus
TreatmentModerate degeneration
Grade IV
PatternInhomogeneous dark gray, decreased height
TreatmentAdvanced degeneration
Grade V
PatternInhomogeneous black, collapsed disc
TreatmentSevere degeneration

Critical Must-Knows

  • Nucleus pulposus: 80% water, Type II collagen, gelatinous, resists compression
  • Annulus fibrosus: 15-20 lamellae, Type I collagen at Β±30Β°, resists tension and torsion
  • Avascular after age 20 - nutrients diffuse through endplates (major limitation to healing)
  • Disc height loss with degeneration β†’ facet joint overload β†’ osteoarthritis cascade
  • Endplate injury disrupts nutrition β†’ accelerates degeneration (Modic changes)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Viva opener: 'Draw the intervertebral disc showing annular fiber orientation'
  • "
    Key biomechanical function: Compression resistance (nucleus) + tensile/torsional resistance (annulus)
  • "
    Disc degeneration is biochemical before structural - proteoglycan loss β†’ water loss β†’ height loss
  • "
    Pfirrmann grading (MRI T2): Grade I (white) β†’ Grade V (black, collapsed)

Critical Disc Biology Exam Points

Nucleus Pulposus Structure

80% water, Type II collagen, aggrecan proteoglycans. Gelatinous consistency provides hydrostatic compression resistance. Water content decreases with age (80% at birth β†’ 70% by age 60).

Annulus Fibrosus Architecture

15-20 concentric lamellae of Type I collagen oriented at Β±30Β° alternating layers. This crossed-fiber arrangement resists tensile and torsional loads.

Nutrition Pathway

Avascular after age 20 - largest avascular structure in body. Nutrients (oxygen, glucose) diffuse through vertebral endplates. Diffusion pathway is 8mm β†’ cells furthest from blood supply.

Degeneration Cascade

Biochemical β†’ Structural β†’ Biomechanical failure. Proteoglycan loss β†’ water loss β†’ height loss β†’ facet overload β†’ OA. Endplate injury accelerates process.

Mnemonic

NAEDisc Components and Functions

N
Nucleus pulposus
Central gelatinous core - resists compression (80% water, Type II collagen)
A
Annulus fibrosus
Outer fibrous ring - resists tension and torsion (Type I collagen, Β±30Β° orientation)
E
Endplates (cartilaginous)
Superior and inferior boundaries - nutrition pathway (diffusion only route)

Memory Hook:NAE the disc! Nucleus for compression, Annulus for tension, Endplates for nutrition.

Mnemonic

PANDADisc Degeneration Cascade

P
Proteoglycan loss
Aggrecan degradation by MMPs
A
Apoptosis of cells
Nutrient deprivation β†’ cell death
N
Nucleus dehydration
Water content drops from 80% to under 60%
D
Disc height loss
Structural collapse, decreased T2 signal
A
Adjacent facet arthritis
Load transfer to facets β†’ OA

Memory Hook:Disc degeneration follows the PANDA pathway from biochemical to structural failure.

Overview and Introduction

Gross Anatomy

The intervertebral disc comprises three distinct components:

1. Nucleus Pulposus (Central):

  • Gelatinous, hydrated core
  • 80% water at birth, decreasing to 70% by age 60
  • Type II collagen (random orientation) and aggrecan
  • Resists compressive loads through hydrostatic pressure
  • Located slightly posterior to anatomical center (important for herniation pathomechanics)

2. Annulus Fibrosus (Peripheral):

  • 15-20 concentric lamellae of Type I collagen
  • Fibers oriented at Β±30Β° from horizontal in alternating layers
  • Outer annulus contains pain fibers (recurrent meningeal nerve of Luschka)
  • Inner annulus blends with nucleus (no clear boundary)
  • Anterior annulus thicker than posterior (posterior more prone to tear)

3. Cartilaginous Endplates (Superior/Inferior):

  • Thin layer of hyaline cartilage (0.6-1.0 mm thick)
  • Covers vertebral body endplate
  • Primary route for disc nutrition (diffusion pathway)
  • Weakest structural component (vulnerable to trauma)

Microstructure and Composition

Nucleus Pulposus Composition

  • Water: 70-80% (age-dependent)
  • Proteoglycans: 50-65% dry weight (mainly aggrecan)
  • Collagen: 15-20% dry weight (Type II, random orientation)
  • Cells: Notochordal cells (young), chondrocyte-like cells (adult)

Annulus Fibrosus Composition

  • Water: 60-70%
  • Collagen: 50-60% dry weight (Type I)
  • Proteoglycans: 10-20% dry weight
  • Cells: Fibrochondrocytes

The crossed-fiber arrangement of the annulus (alternating Β±30Β° layers) creates a structure that:

  • Resists tensile loads in any direction
  • Resists torsional (rotational) loads
  • Confines the nucleus centrally under compression
  • Prevents nuclear herniation (when intact)

Concepts and Molecular Biology

Core Biochemical Concepts

Extracellular Matrix Composition:

The disc matrix determines function and undergoes significant changes with age and degeneration:

  • Nucleus pulposus: Aggrecan proteoglycan (water retention), Type II collagen (scaffold)
  • Annulus fibrosus: Type I collagen (tensile strength), elastin (elasticity)
  • Endplate: Hyaline cartilage, collagen, proteoglycans (nutrient passage)

Cellular Biology:

  • Notochordal cells (embryonic) β†’ replaced by chondrocyte-like cells by adulthood
  • Cell density very low (sparse population)
  • Cells rely entirely on diffusion for oxygen and glucose (8mm diffusion distance)
  • Hypoxic environment with anaerobic metabolism

Molecular Degeneration Pathway:

  1. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and ADAMTS degrade proteoglycans
  2. Aggrecan loss β†’ decreased water retention (80% β†’ under 60%)
  3. Type II collagen replaced by Type I collagen
  4. Disc height decreases β†’ altered load distribution
  5. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, TNF-alpha) perpetuate cycle

Biomechanical Function

Load Distribution

The disc functions as a load-bearing hydraulic system:

Under Compression:

  1. Nucleus pulposus subjected to hydrostatic pressure
  2. Nucleus attempts to expand radially
  3. Annulus fibrosus resists radial expansion (hoop stress in fibers)
  4. Load distributed evenly across vertebral endplate

Under Flexion/Extension:

  • Anterior annulus compressed, posterior annulus tensioned (flexion)
  • Posterior annulus compressed, anterior annulus tensioned (extension)
  • Nucleus shifts posteriorly (flexion) or anteriorly (extension)

Under Lateral Bending and Rotation:

  • Asymmetric loading of annular lamellae
  • Crossed-fiber orientation resists torsion
  • Rotation is the most damaging motion (shear forces on annulus)

Disc Response to Loading

Load TypeNucleus ResponseAnnulus ResponseClinical Significance
CompressionHydrostatic pressure increasesHoop stress in fibersNormal weight-bearing
FlexionShifts posteriorlyAnterior compressed, posterior tensionedPosterior annular stress
RotationMinimal responseShear stress on lamellaeMost damaging motion

Viscoelastic Properties

The disc demonstrates time-dependent behavior:

  • Creep: Under constant load, disc height decreases over time (fluid exudation)
  • Stress relaxation: Under constant deformation, internal stress decreases over time
  • Diurnal variation: Disc height decreases 20mm during day (fluid loss), recovers overnight
  • Age-related changes: Decreased water content β†’ decreased viscoelasticity

This viscoelastic behavior explains why back pain is often worse in the morning (disc fully hydrated, maximum intradiscal pressure) and why prolonged standing/sitting causes symptoms (creep deformation).

Nutrition and Metabolism

Avascular Nature

The adult intervertebral disc is the largest avascular structure in the human body:

  • Vascularized in childhood: Blood vessels penetrate endplates
  • Avascular by age 20: Vessels regress, diffusion becomes only nutrition route
  • Longest diffusion pathway: Up to 8mm from endplate to central nucleus
  • Metabolic challenge: Cells in center of disc furthest from blood supply in body

Nutritional Limitation to Healing

The avascular nature of the disc is the primary reason discs do not heal once injured:

  • No blood supply β†’ no inflammatory cells β†’ no repair cascade
  • Cells rely on diffusion for oxygen and glucose
  • Cells furthest from blood supply are most vulnerable to nutrient deprivation
  • Endplate injury or sclerosis β†’ disrupts already tenuous nutrition β†’ accelerated degeneration

This is fundamentally different from other musculoskeletal tissues (bone, tendon, ligament) which have robust healing capacity due to vascularity.

Nutrient Transport

Diffusion Pathway for Disc Nutrition

Step 1Source

Nutrients (oxygen, glucose) in vertebral body capillaries adjacent to endplate.

Step 2Endplate Diffusion

Nutrients diffuse through porous cartilaginous endplate (0.6-1.0mm thick).

Step 3Matrix Diffusion

Nutrients diffuse through disc matrix (up to 8mm to reach central nucleus cells).

Step 4Cellular Uptake

Nucleus pulposus cells metabolize nutrients anaerobically (low oxygen environment).

Factors Affecting Disc Nutrition:

  • Endplate permeability: Sclerosis or calcification β†’ decreased diffusion β†’ cell death
  • Disc height: Thicker discs β†’ longer diffusion pathway β†’ poorer nutrition
  • Loading: Cyclic loading enhances diffusion (pumping action), static loading impairs it
  • Smoking: Decreases endplate blood supply β†’ accelerates degeneration

Disc Degeneration

Degeneration Cascade

Disc degeneration follows a predictable biochemical β†’ structural β†’ biomechanical pathway:

Early Degeneration (Pfirrmann I-II)

Proteoglycan Loss:

  • Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade aggrecan
  • Loss of aggrecan β†’ decreased osmotic pressure
  • Decreased water-binding capacity

Cellular Changes:

  • Nutrient deprivation β†’ increased apoptosis
  • Decreased cell density
  • Shift from anabolic to catabolic metabolism
  • Inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF-Ξ±) upregulated

Biochemical markers:

  • Decreased proteoglycan content (MRI: decreased T2 signal)
  • Increased collagen cross-linking
  • pH decreases (lactate accumulation from anaerobic metabolism)

Early changes are reversible with improved nutrition (theoretical).

Progressive Degeneration (Pfirrmann III-IV)

Nucleus Changes:

  • Water content decreases (80% β†’ 60%)
  • Nucleus becomes fibrous (Type I collagen replaces Type II)
  • Loss of gel-like consistency β†’ decreased hydrostatic function

Annular Changes:

  • Radial tears develop (inside-out propagation)
  • Lamellae separation and delamination
  • Decreased tensile strength

Structural changes:

  • Disc height loss (decreased osmotic pressure)
  • Bulging annulus (loss of nuclear turgor)
  • Endplate irregularity and sclerosis

Structural phase changes are irreversible.

Advanced Degeneration (Pfirrmann V)

Segmental Instability:

  • Loss of disc height β†’ facet joint overload
  • Abnormal motion patterns
  • Facet joint osteoarthritis

Compensatory Changes:

  • Osteophyte formation (attempting to stabilize segment)
  • Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy
  • Facet hypertrophy

Clinical Sequelae:

  • Spinal stenosis (from compensatory hypertrophy)
  • Spondylolisthesis (from facet arthritis and instability)
  • Chronic axial back pain

End-stage degeneration may paradoxically stabilize through autofusion.

Pfirrmann Classification (MRI Grading)

Pfirrmann MRI Classification of Disc Degeneration

GradeStructureSignal (T2)Disc HeightInterpretation
IHomogeneous bright whiteHyperintenseNormalNormal disc
IIInhomogeneous with horizontal bandHyperintenseNormalEarly degeneration
IIIInhomogeneous grayIntermediateNormal/decreasedModerate degeneration
IVInhomogeneous dark grayHypointenseDecreasedAdvanced degeneration
VInhomogeneous blackHypointenseCollapsedSevere degeneration
MRI T2-weighted and quantitative mapping images showing Pfirrmann grades I-IV
Click to expand
Quantitative MRI assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration across Pfirrmann grades I-IV (ovine lumbar model). Top row: T2-weighted sagittal images showing progressive signal loss from Grade I (bright, healthy) to Grade IV (dark, degenerated). Corresponding T1, T2, and T2* relaxation maps below demonstrate decreasing relaxation times (red→blue) correlating with proteoglycan and water content loss. Grade I shows high nucleus pulposus signal with distinct NP-AF differentiation; Grade IV shows homogeneous low signal with loss of structural organization.Credit: Deml C et al., Sci Rep 2022 - CC BY 4.0
Clinical MRI cases showing disc and facet joint degeneration with T2* mapping
Click to expand
Clinical application of T2* mapping in lumbar spine degeneration. Four cases (A-D) showing axial MRI with corresponding T2* color maps. Each panel shows anatomical image (left) with paired T2* map (right). Cases demonstrate varying degrees of intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration, with blue indicating low T2* values (degenerated tissue) and warmer colors indicating higher T2* values (healthier tissue). This quantitative technique allows objective assessment of disc biochemical composition beyond morphological grading.Credit: Jiang Y et al., BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024 - CC BY 4.0

Modic Endplate Changes

Modic changes represent endplate and adjacent bone marrow pathology associated with disc degeneration:

  • Type I (T1 low, T2 high): Edema and inflammation β†’ acute/active degeneration
  • Type II (T1 high, T2 high): Fatty replacement β†’ chronic degeneration
  • Type III (T1 low, T2 low): Sclerosis β†’ end-stage degeneration

Modic Type I changes are associated with discogenic back pain and may represent an inflammatory phenotype amenable to treatment.

Clinical Relevance and Applications

Understanding Disc Biology Informs Clinical Practice

Why Discs Don't Heal:

  • Avascular after age 20 β†’ no inflammatory healing response
  • Low cell density β†’ insufficient regenerative capacity
  • Hostile biochemical environment with catabolic cytokines
  • This explains why conservative treatment focuses on symptom management

Surgical Implications:

  • Discectomy removes herniating nucleus but accelerates degeneration
  • Fusion eliminates motion segment but increases adjacent level stress
  • Disc replacement aims to preserve motion but long-term outcomes variable
  • Biologic therapies (stem cells, growth factors) target regeneration

Prevention and Modification:

  • Smoking cessation (nicotine impairs already limited nutrition)
  • Weight management (reduces compressive load)
  • Avoid repetitive flexion-rotation (most damaging motion)
  • Core strengthening (dynamic stabilization)

Evidence Base

Disc Nutrition and Degeneration: Foundational Study

4
Urban JP, Roberts S β€’ J Bone Joint Surg Br (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Adult disc is largest avascular structure - nutrition by diffusion only
  • Diffusion pathway up to 8mm from endplate to central nucleus
  • Cells in disc center have lowest oxygen and glucose levels in body
  • Endplate calcification or sclerosis disrupts already tenuous nutrition
  • Smoking decreases endplate blood supply, accelerating degeneration
Clinical Implication: Disc's avascular nature explains why it cannot heal once injured and why endplate injury accelerates degeneration.
Limitation: Review article synthesizing existing literature - not original research.

Pfirrmann Classification of Disc Degeneration

3
Pfirrmann CW et al β€’ Spine (2001)
Key Findings:
  • MRI-based classification: Grades I-V based on T2 signal and structure
  • Grade I: Bright homogeneous (normal)
  • Grade V: Black heterogeneous with collapse (severe degeneration)
  • Good inter-observer reliability (kappa 0.84)
  • Correlates with histological and biochemical degeneration
Clinical Implication: Standardized MRI grading system for disc degeneration - widely used in research and clinical practice.
Limitation: Classification is descriptive, not prognostic - does not predict clinical symptoms or outcomes.

Modic Endplate Changes and Clinical Correlation

3
Modic MT et al β€’ Radiology (1988)
Key Findings:
  • Described three types of vertebral endplate marrow changes
  • Type I: Edema/inflammation (active process)
  • Type II: Fatty replacement (chronic stable)
  • Type III: Sclerosis (end-stage)
  • Type I associated with discogenic pain
Clinical Implication: Modic Type I changes may identify patients with inflammatory discogenic pain who could benefit from targeted therapies.
Limitation: Observational imaging study - causation vs correlation with pain not established.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Basic Disc Structure and Function

EXAMINER

"The examiner shows you a sagittal MRI of the lumbar spine and asks: 'Describe the structure and biomechanical function of the intervertebral disc.'"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The intervertebral disc consists of three components: the nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and cartilaginous endplates. The nucleus pulposus is a gelatinous core composed of 70-80% water, Type II collagen in random orientation, and aggrecan proteoglycans. It resists compressive loads through hydrostatic pressure. The annulus fibrosus surrounds the nucleus and consists of 15-20 concentric lamellae of Type I collagen oriented at plus or minus 30 degrees in alternating layers. This crossed-fiber arrangement resists tensile and torsional loads and confines the nucleus. The cartilaginous endplates cover the superior and inferior vertebral bodies and serve as the primary nutrition pathway, as the disc is avascular after age 20. Under compression, the nucleus generates hydrostatic pressure which is resisted by hoop stress in the annular fibers, distributing load evenly across the endplate. The disc also demonstrates viscoelastic behavior with creep and stress relaxation, explaining diurnal height variation of up to 20mm.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Three components: Nucleus (Type II, 80% water), Annulus (Type I, Β±30Β° lamellae), Endplates (nutrition)
Biomechanics: Nucleus resists compression (hydrostatic), Annulus resists tension and torsion (hoop stress)
Avascular after age 20 - nutrition by diffusion through endplates only
Viscoelastic properties: Creep, stress relaxation, diurnal height variation
COMMON TRAPS
βœ—Confusing Type I and Type II collagen locations (Annulus = Type I, Nucleus = Type II)
βœ—Not mentioning the crossed-fiber orientation of annular lamellae (Β±30Β°)
βœ—Forgetting that the disc is avascular - critical for understanding healing limitations
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why is the annular fiber orientation important biomechanically?"
"How does the disc receive nutrition if it's avascular?"
"What happens to intradiscal pressure during the day?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Disc Degeneration Cascade

EXAMINER

"The examiner shows you sequential MRI scans showing progressive disc degeneration and asks: 'Describe the pathophysiology of disc degeneration and the Pfirrmann classification.'"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Disc degeneration follows a predictable cascade from biochemical to structural to biomechanical failure. Initially, there is proteoglycan loss due to matrix metalloproteinase activity, leading to decreased osmotic pressure and water content. This is coupled with cellular apoptosis from nutrient deprivation, as the disc relies on diffusion through endplates for nutrition. Biochemical changes progress to structural changes: the nucleus becomes fibrous as Type I collagen replaces Type II, disc height decreases, and radial annular tears develop. This culminates in biomechanical failure with segmental instability, facet joint overload, and osteoarthritis. The Pfirrmann classification grades degeneration on MRI T2-weighted images: Grade I shows a bright homogeneous nucleus (normal), Grade II shows inhomogeneity with a horizontal band (early degeneration), Grade III shows a gray inhomogeneous nucleus (moderate), Grade IV shows dark gray signal with decreased height (advanced), and Grade V shows black signal with collapse (severe). Modic changes in the adjacent vertebral endplates indicate active inflammation (Type I), chronic fatty replacement (Type II), or end-stage sclerosis (Type III). Type I Modic changes correlate with discogenic pain.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Cascade: Biochemical (proteoglycan loss) β†’ Structural (nucleus fibrosis, height loss) β†’ Biomechanical (instability, facet OA)
Pfirrmann I-V: White (normal) β†’ Black with collapse (severe degeneration)
Modic changes: Type I = inflammation, Type II = fat, Type III = sclerosis
Avascular disc cannot heal - degeneration is progressive and irreversible
COMMON TRAPS
βœ—Not explaining the biochemical basis first (proteoglycan loss β†’ water loss)
βœ—Confusing Pfirrmann grades (memorize I = white/normal, V = black/collapsed)
βœ—Forgetting Modic changes and their clinical correlation with pain
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why doesn't the disc heal once degeneration starts?"
"What accelerates disc degeneration?"
"How would you differentiate Modic Type I from Type II on MRI?"

MCQ Practice Points

Collagen Type Question

Q: What is the predominant collagen type in the nucleus pulposus versus the annulus fibrosus?

A: Nucleus pulposus: Type II collagen (random orientation). Annulus fibrosus: Type I collagen (organized in Β±30Β° alternating lamellae). This reflects their different biomechanical roles: nucleus resists compression, annulus resists tension and torsion.

Nutrition Question

Q: How does the adult intervertebral disc receive nutrition, and what is the significance?

A: Diffusion through cartilaginous endplates - the disc is avascular after age 20. This is the longest diffusion pathway in the body (up to 8mm). The avascular nature explains why discs cannot heal once injured and why endplate injury accelerates degeneration by disrupting the already tenuous nutrition supply.

Pfirrmann Classification Question

Q: Describe the Pfirrmann Grade I and Grade V disc on MRI.

A: Grade I: Bright white (hyperintense) homogeneous nucleus on T2, normal disc height - represents a normal disc. Grade V: Black (hypointense) heterogeneous signal on T2, collapsed disc height - represents severe degeneration. The classification progresses from I to V based on decreasing T2 signal (water content) and disc height.

Modic Changes Question

Q: What is a Modic Type I change and its clinical significance?

A: Modic Type I: T1 low signal, T2 high signal - represents edema and inflammation in the vertebral endplate and adjacent bone marrow. This indicates active/acute degeneration and correlates with discogenic back pain. It may represent an inflammatory phenotype amenable to targeted treatment.

Biomechanics Question

Q: Why is the annular fiber orientation at Β±30Β° biomechanically important?

A: The alternating Β±30Β° crossed-fiber arrangement allows the annulus to resist loads in multiple directions: tensile forces in any direction, torsional (rotational) forces, and radial expansion of the nucleus under compression. This creates hoop stress that confines the nucleus and distributes load evenly.

Management Algorithm

πŸ“Š Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Intervertebral Disc Biology
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Intervertebral Disc BiologyCredit: OrthoVellum

INTERVERTEBRAL DISC BIOLOGY

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Structures

  • β€’Nucleus pulposus: 80% water, Type II collagen, aggrecan, resists compression
  • β€’Annulus fibrosus: 15-20 lamellae, Type I collagen at Β±30Β°, resists tension/torsion
  • β€’Cartilaginous endplates: 0.6-1.0mm thick, nutrition pathway
  • β€’Avascular after age 20 - largest avascular structure in body

Biomechanical Functions

  • β€’Nucleus: Hydrostatic compression resistance
  • β€’Annulus: Tensile and torsional resistance via hoop stress
  • β€’Crossed fibers (Β±30Β°): Resist multi-directional loads
  • β€’Viscoelastic: Creep, stress relaxation, 20mm diurnal variation

Nutrition Pathway

  • β€’Diffusion only route (no blood supply)
  • β€’Pathway: Vertebral capillaries β†’ Endplate β†’ Disc matrix (up to 8mm)
  • β€’Endplate injury/sclerosis β†’ disrupts nutrition β†’ accelerates degeneration
  • β€’Smoking decreases endplate blood supply

Degeneration Cascade

  • β€’Biochemical: Proteoglycan loss β†’ water loss
  • β€’Structural: Nucleus fibrosis, height loss, annular tears
  • β€’Biomechanical: Instability β†’ facet overload β†’ OA
  • β€’Irreversible once structural changes occur

Pfirrmann Classification

  • β€’Grade I: Bright white homogeneous (normal)
  • β€’Grade II: Inhomogeneous with band (early degeneration)
  • β€’Grade III: Gray inhomogeneous (moderate)
  • β€’Grade IV: Dark gray, decreased height (advanced)
  • β€’Grade V: Black, collapsed (severe)

Modic Changes

  • β€’Type I: T1 low, T2 high = edema/inflammation (active, painful)
  • β€’Type II: T1 high, T2 high = fatty replacement (chronic stable)
  • β€’Type III: T1 low, T2 low = sclerosis (end-stage)
Quick Stats
Reading Time61 min
Related Topics

Meniscus Structure and Function

Articular Cartilage Structure and Function

Bioabsorbable Materials

Calcium Phosphate Cements