Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Intramedullary Spinal Tumors

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Intramedullary Spinal Tumors

Comprehensive guide to intramedullary spinal cord tumors including ependymoma, astrocytoma, and hemangioblastoma with surgical management for FRACS examination

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Intramedullary Spinal Tumors

Visual One-Pager

Intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCTs) arise from within the substance of the spinal cord parenchyma, representing 4-10% of all central nervous system tumors. The most common types are ependymomas (60%), astrocytomas (30%), and hemangioblastomas (3-5%). These tumors present a unique surgical challenge requiring microsurgical techniques to maximize resection while preserving neurological function.

Key Recognition Features:

  • Progressive myelopathy with sensory and motor deficits
  • Central cord syndrome pattern (dissociated sensory loss, upper limb weakness)
  • MRI showing intramedullary enhancement with cord expansion
  • Typically solitary lesion (except hemangioblastoma in von Hippel-Lindau)

Critical Diagnostic Pathway:

  1. MRI whole spine with gadolinium contrast (gold standard)
  2. Assessment of syrinx formation (present in 40-60%)
  3. Exclude extramedullary differential diagnoses
  4. Consider von Hippel-Lindau screening if hemangioblastoma
  5. Pre-operative neurophysiological assessment

High-Yield Exam Points:

  • Ependymomas are most common, well-circumscribed, WHO Grade II, excellent surgical plane
  • Astrocytomas infiltrative, less distinct plane, poorer prognosis
  • Hemangioblastomas highly vascular, pial-based, associated with VHL syndrome
  • Intraoperative neuromonitoring (SSEP, MEP) mandatory during resection
  • Gross total resection (GTR) is goal for ependymoma and hemangioblastoma; subtotal for infiltrative astrocytoma

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Spinal Cord Microanatomy

Understanding the internal architecture of the spinal cord is essential for surgical planning:

Transverse Organization:

  • Gray matter (butterfly-shaped): central location, motor neurons ventral, sensory neurons dorsal
  • White matter: surrounding tracts organized in columns
  • Central canal: remnant of neural tube, potential syrinx formation site
  • Anterior median fissure and posterior median sulcus: anatomical landmarks

White Matter Tracts:

  • Dorsal columns (posterior): proprioception and fine touch
  • Lateral corticospinal tracts: motor function (crossed)
  • Spinothalamic tracts (anterolateral): pain and temperature (crossed)
  • Preservation critical during myelotomy

Vascular Supply:

  • Anterior spinal artery (single): supplies anterior two-thirds of cord
  • Posterior spinal arteries (paired): supply posterior one-third
  • Radicular arteries: segmental supply, variable anatomy
  • Artery of Adamkiewicz: major anterior radicular artery (T9-L2), critical to preserve

Surgical Corridor Implications:

  • Posterior median sulcus: avascular midline entry point for myelotomy
  • Dorsal columns: least morbid route to access intramedullary lesions
  • Avoid lateral myelotomy: risks corticospinal and spinothalamic tracts

Tumor Histopathology

Mnemonic

EAHEAH Classification of Common Intramedullary Tumors

E
Ependymoma
60% of IMSCTs, well-circumscribed, WHO Grade II, arises from ependymal cells lining central canal
A
Astrocytoma
30% of IMSCTs, infiltrative, WHO Grade II-IV, arises from astrocytes, spans multiple segments
H
Hemangioblastoma
3-5% of IMSCTs, highly vascular, pial-based, associated with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (25% of cases)

Memory Hook:Remember EAH as the three main intramedullary tumors in descending frequency

Ependymoma Characteristics:

  • Origin: Ependymal cells of central canal
  • WHO Grade: II (most common), III (anaplastic, rare)
  • Macroscopic: Well-encapsulated, "pushes" rather than infiltrates
  • Microscopic: Perivascular pseudorosettes, true ependymal rosettes
  • Location: Cervical and cervicothoracic most common (60%)
  • Syrinx: Associated rostral/caudal syrinx in 60% of cases
  • Resectability: Excellent surgical plane allows GTR in 80-90%

Astrocytoma Characteristics:

  • Origin: Neoplastic astrocytes
  • WHO Grade: II (low-grade) or III-IV (high-grade glioblastoma)
  • Macroscopic: Infiltrative, indistinct margins, cord enlargement
  • Microscopic: Fibrillary background, nuclear atypia, mitoses (high-grade)
  • Location: Thoracic most common in adults, cervical in children
  • Syrinx: Less commonly associated
  • Resectability: GTR rarely achievable due to infiltration

Hemangioblastoma Characteristics:

  • Origin: Pial vessels and subpial region
  • WHO Grade: I (benign)
  • Macroscopic: Highly vascular nodule with feeding vessels, pial-based
  • Microscopic: Stromal cells and abundant capillaries
  • Location: Cervical and thoracic, often dorsal cord
  • Association: Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome in 25% (autosomal dominant)
  • Resectability: GTR achievable if vascular control obtained

Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Cord Dysfunction

Mechanical Compression:

  • Direct pressure on neural tracts from tumor expansion
  • Interruption of axonal transport and nerve conduction
  • Venous congestion and edema around tumor
  • Progressive weakness and sensory loss

Vascular Compromise:

  • Compression of radicular arteries
  • Tumor neovascularization "stealing" blood supply
  • Venous hypertension from tumor mass effect
  • Risk of cord infarction during manipulation

Syrinx Formation (40-60% of cases):

  • Obstruction of CSF flow around tumor
  • Dissection of fluid into central canal
  • Progressive cavity formation rostral and caudal to tumor
  • Syringomyelia symptoms: dissociated sensory loss, weakness
  • Syrinx often resolves after tumor resection

Clinical Presentation

Presenting Symptoms

Motor Dysfunction (85% of patients):

  • Progressive weakness in limbs
  • Upper motor neuron pattern: spasticity, hyperreflexia, clonus
  • Lower motor neuron signs if anterior horn cell involvement
  • Gait disturbance and ataxia
  • Progression over months to years (indolent tumors)

Sensory Disturbances (75% of patients):

  • Dissociated sensory loss: impaired pain/temperature, preserved proprioception
  • Indicates central cord involvement (spinothalamic tract)
  • Paresthesias and dysesthesias
  • Sensory level indicating tumor location
  • Posterior column signs: impaired vibration and proprioception

Pain Syndromes (65% of patients):

  • Local back or neck pain at tumor level
  • Radicular pain in dermatomal distribution
  • Central neuropathic pain (burning, dysesthetic)
  • Nocturnal pain common
  • Exacerbated by Valsalva maneuvers

Autonomic Dysfunction (30% of patients):

  • Bladder dysfunction: urgency, frequency, retention
  • Bowel dysfunction: constipation
  • Sexual dysfunction
  • Indicates advanced cord involvement
  • Associated with poorer outcomes

Syringomyelia Features:

  • Cape-like distribution of sensory loss (shoulders and arms)
  • Dissociated sensory loss (pain/temperature affected, proprioception spared)
  • Charcot joints (neuropathic arthropathy)
  • Horner syndrome if cervical syrinx

Clinical Examination Findings

Mnemonic

SPINALSPINAL Cord Tumor Examination Findings

S
Sensory level
Dermatomal level of sensory deficit localizes tumor
P
Pyramidal signs
Hyperreflexia, spasticity, Babinski positive, clonus
I
Impaired proprioception
Dorsal column dysfunction, positive Romberg, ataxia
N
Neurogenic bladder
Urgency, frequency, retention; assess post-void residual
A
Atrophy
Muscle wasting if anterior horn involvement or chronic denervation
L
Lower motor neuron
Fasciculations, hyporeflexia at tumor level if anterior horn affected

Memory Hook:Think SPINAL examination for cord tumors

Cervical Level Tumors:

  • Upper limb weakness (proximal > distal initially)
  • Hand intrinsic muscle atrophy if C8-T1
  • Inverted radial reflex (C5-C6 tumor)
  • Horner syndrome (T1 involvement)
  • Respiratory compromise if high cervical (C3-C5)

Thoracic Level Tumors:

  • Truncal ataxia and gait disturbance
  • Abdominal wall reflex abnormalities
  • Sensory level on trunk
  • Lower limb spasticity and weakness
  • Bladder dysfunction common

Conus/Cauda Tumors:

  • Lower limb weakness (mixed UMN/LMN pattern)
  • Saddle anesthesia
  • Early bladder and bowel dysfunction
  • Erectile dysfunction
  • Absent ankle reflexes

Differential Diagnosis

Extramedullary Intradural Tumors:

  • Meningioma, nerve sheath tumor (schwannoma, neurofibroma)
  • Clinical: early radicular pain, late myelopathy
  • MRI: dural tail sign, CSF cap around tumor, cord displacement not expansion

Demyelinating Disease (Multiple Sclerosis):

  • Relapsing-remitting pattern
  • Multiple CNS lesions on MRI brain
  • CSF oligoclonal bands
  • Optic neuritis and internuclear ophthalmoplegia

Arteriovenous Malformation:

  • Sudden onset symptoms or stepwise progression
  • Flow voids on MRI (serpentine vessels)
  • Spinal angiography definitive
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage risk

Transverse Myelitis:

  • Acute onset over hours to days
  • Preceding viral illness or vaccination
  • Diffuse cord edema on MRI
  • CSF pleocytosis

Investigations

MRI Imaging (Gold Standard)

Protocol Requirements:

  • Whole spine sagittal and axial sequences
  • T1-weighted pre- and post-gadolinium
  • T2-weighted for cord signal and syrinx
  • STIR or fat-suppressed sequences
  • Thin slices (3 mm) through tumor

Characteristic MRI Findings by Tumor Type:

MRI Characteristics of Intramedullary Tumors

FeatureEpendymomaAstrocytomaHemangioblastoma

Additional MRI Assessment:

  • Cord expansion: typically 2-3 vertebral levels
  • Pial enhancement: suggests pial-based tumor or leptomeningeal spread
  • Hemosiderin staining: previous hemorrhage (hemangioblastoma)
  • Extent of syrinx: may require drainage in addition to tumor resection

Ancillary Investigations

Pre-Operative Workup:

  • MRI brain: exclude intracranial lesions (especially if hemangioblastoma)
  • Spine X-rays: assess spinal alignment and bony anatomy
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: staging if high-grade or metastatic potential
  • Cardiac and respiratory assessment: anesthesia fitness
  • Urodynamic studies: if bladder dysfunction present

Von Hippel-Lindau Screening (if Hemangioblastoma):

  • Genetic testing for VHL gene mutation
  • Retinal examination: retinal angiomas
  • MRI brain: cerebellar hemangioblastomas
  • Ultrasound/CT abdomen: renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic tumors
  • Family history assessment
  • Annual surveillance imaging if VHL confirmed

Neurophysiology:

  • Pre-operative SSEP and MEP: baseline motor and sensory function
  • Intraoperative monitoring: real-time assessment during resection
  • Post-operative studies: document neurological changes

Tissue Diagnosis

Intraoperative Frozen Section:

  • Confirms tumor pathology during surgery
  • Guides extent of resection
  • Differentiates tumor from gliosis or demyelination
  • Limited accuracy compared to permanent sections

Permanent Histopathology:

  • Hematoxylin and eosin staining
  • Immunohistochemistry: GFAP (astrocytoma), EMA (ependymoma)
  • Ki-67 proliferation index: predicts tumor behavior
  • WHO grading determines adjuvant therapy need

Molecular Markers (Emerging):

  • IDH1/2 mutations: prognostic in astrocytomas
  • MGMT methylation: predicts chemotherapy response
  • Chromosome 1p/19q codeletion: oligodendroglioma differentiation
  • BRAF mutations: targeted therapy potential

Management

Pre-Operative Planning

Surgical Indications:

  • Symptomatic tumor with progressive neurological deficit
  • Radiological progression on serial imaging
  • Diagnostic uncertainty requiring tissue diagnosis
  • Symptomatic syrinx associated with tumor

Contraindications to Surgery:

  • Medically unfit for general anesthesia
  • Extensive tumor spanning greater than 8 vertebral levels (relative)
  • Severe pre-existing neurological deficit (Frankel A) - relative
  • Disseminated disease with limited life expectancy

Risk-Benefit Discussion:

  • Risk of neurological deterioration: 10-30% depending on tumor and cord function
  • Expected degree of resection based on imaging characteristics
  • Natural history without surgery: progressive neurological decline
  • Role of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Realistic functional outcomes and rehabilitation needs

Microsurgical Resection Technique

Extent of Resection Definitions

Gross Total Resection (GTR):

  • No visible tumor on post-operative MRI at 3 months
  • Gold standard for ependymoma and hemangioblastoma
  • Associated with best long-term outcomes
  • Lower recurrence rates (ependymoma 10-year recurrence less than 20%)

Subtotal Resection (STR):

  • Residual tumor less than 10% of original volume
  • Often appropriate for infiltrative astrocytoma
  • May require adjuvant radiotherapy
  • Higher recurrence risk

Partial Resection:

  • Greater than 10% residual tumor
  • Reserved for highly infiltrative or eloquent location tumors
  • Adjuvant therapy usually indicated
  • May provide symptomatic relief and tissue diagnosis

Adjuvant Therapy

Radiation Therapy Indications:

  • High-grade astrocytoma (WHO Grade III-IV): definitive radiotherapy
  • Residual ependymoma after STR
  • Recurrent ependymoma
  • Anaplastic ependymoma (WHO Grade III)
  • Typical dose: 45-54 Gy in 25-30 fractions

Chemotherapy:

  • Limited role in spinal cord gliomas
  • Temozolomide for high-grade astrocytoma
  • Combination with radiotherapy (Stupp protocol)
  • Clinical trial enrollment when appropriate

Surveillance Imaging:

  • MRI at 3 months post-operative (baseline)
  • Every 6 months for 2 years
  • Annually thereafter
  • Lifelong surveillance due to late recurrence risk

Complications

Mnemonic

DEFICITSDEFICITS After Intramedullary Tumor Surgery

D
Deterioration (neurological)
Worsening weakness or sensory loss: 15-30% of cases, often transient
E
Epidural hematoma
Post-operative cord compression requiring emergency re-exploration
F
Fistula (CSF)
CSF leak through wound: 5-10% incidence, may require re-closure
I
Infection
Meningitis (1-2%) or wound infection (3-5%)
C
Cord infarction
Vascular injury to anterior or posterior spinal arteries: rare but devastating
I
Instability (spinal)
Kyphotic deformity if greater than 50% facet resection or pediatric
T
Tumor recurrence
Ependymoma 20% at 10 years, astrocytoma higher
S
Syrinx persistence
Failure of syrinx to resolve post-resection: 10-20% of cases

Memory Hook:Monitor for DEFICITS after intramedullary cord tumor surgery

Early Complications (less than 30 days):

Neurological Deterioration:

  • Incidence: 15-30% of patients
  • Mechanisms: cord edema, manipulation injury, vascular compromise
  • Presentation: worsening weakness, ascending sensory level
  • Management: high-dose dexamethasone, maintain MAP greater than 85 mmHg, urgent MRI if concern for hematoma
  • Prognosis: 60-70% recover to baseline or better by 6 months

Epidural Hematoma:

  • Incidence: 2-5%
  • Presentation: acute neurological deterioration within 24 hours
  • Diagnosis: urgent MRI showing epidural collection with cord compression
  • Management: emergency surgical evacuation
  • Prevention: meticulous hemostasis, avoid epidural drain

CSF Leak:

  • Incidence: 5-10%
  • Presentation: wound drainage, CSF otorrhea (if high cervical), positional headache
  • Diagnosis: fluid analysis (glucose, beta-2 transferrin)
  • Management: bed rest, acetazolamide, wound re-exploration if persistent
  • Complications: meningitis risk, pseudomeningocele

Infection:

  • Meningitis: 1-2% incidence, presents with fever, headache, neck stiffness
  • Wound infection: 3-5%, erythema, drainage, fever
  • Diagnosis: CSF analysis (pleocytosis, low glucose), wound cultures
  • Management: broad-spectrum antibiotics (vancomycin plus ceftriaxone), surgical washout if deep infection

Late Complications (greater than 30 days):

Spinal Instability and Deformity:

  • Risk factors: greater than 50% facet resection, pediatric age, multilevel laminectomy
  • Presentation: progressive kyphosis, mechanical back pain
  • Prevention: preserve facets, laminoplasty in children, prophylactic fusion if high risk
  • Management: posterior instrumented fusion if symptomatic

Tumor Recurrence:

  • Ependymoma: 10-year recurrence 15-20% after GTR, 40-50% after STR
  • Astrocytoma: 10-year recurrence 60-80% (infiltrative nature)
  • Hemangioblastoma: 5-10% if GTR, higher if VHL syndrome (new tumors)
  • Management: re-resection if feasible, radiotherapy, chemotherapy for high-grade

Persistent Syrinx:

  • Incidence: 10-20% after tumor resection
  • Usually asymptomatic if stable size
  • Symptomatic syrinx may require syringosubarachnoid shunt
  • Investigate for tumor recurrence or arachnoiditis

Evidence Base

Extent of Resection and Outcomes in Spinal Ependymomas

III
Key Findings:
  • GTR achieved in 85% of cases, STR in 15%
  • 10-year progression-free survival: 83% for GTR vs 45% for STR (p less than 0.001)
  • Overall survival at 10 years: 95% for GTR vs 72% for STR
  • Post-operative neurological deterioration: 22%, with 68% recovering to baseline by 6 months
  • WHO Grade III (anaplastic) associated with worse outcomes regardless of resection extent

Functional Outcomes After Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Resection

III
Key Findings:
  • Pre-operative McCormick grade: I-II in 62%, III-IV in 38%
  • Post-operative improvement: 31% of patients, stable 47%, worsened 22%
  • Worsened patients: 68% improved to baseline or better by 12 months
  • Factors predicting improvement: younger age, shorter symptom duration, ependymoma histology, GTR
  • Pre-operative McCormick grade I-II had better post-operative outcomes than III-IV

Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring

III
Key Findings:
  • MEP monitoring sensitivity 91% for predicting new motor deficit
  • SSEP monitoring sensitivity 57% for predicting new sensory deficit
  • Significant MEP amplitude drop (greater than 50%) correlated with post-operative weakness in 73%
  • Intraoperative actions taken (pause resection, increase MAP) reversed 82% of monitoring changes
  • Use of combined SSEP+MEP superior to either modality alone

Management of Spinal Cord Hemangioblastomas in VHL Syndrome

III
Key Findings:
  • Median tumor growth rate: 1.2 mm per year
  • Symptomatic tumors: all underwent resection with 94% GTR rate
  • Asymptomatic tumors: observation with 6-month MRI surveillance
  • 15% of observed tumors required delayed surgery due to symptom development
  • Post-operative complication rate: 18%, with 70% recovering to baseline
  • New tumors developed in 35% of patients during follow-up (median 6 years)

Spinal Cord Astrocytoma: Surgery vs Radiotherapy

III
Key Findings:
  • Median progression-free survival: 6.8 years surgery alone vs 9.2 years surgery+XRT (p=0.08)
  • Overall survival at 10 years: 72% surgery alone vs 68% surgery+XRT (p=0.52)
  • GTR achieved in only 19% of astrocytoma cases (vs 85% for ependymoma)
  • Post-operative radiotherapy benefit unclear for low-grade tumors
  • High-grade astrocytomas: radiotherapy improved PFS (3.2 vs 1.1 years, p=0.02)

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Scenario 1: Cervical Ependymoma with Syrinx

EXAMINER

""

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a cervical intramedullary tumor, most likely ependymoma based on imaging characteristics and demographics. The progressive myelopathy with upper and lower limb involvement indicates the need for surgical intervention. My management would focus on microsurgical resection with the goal of gross total resection, which offers the best long-term outcomes for ependymoma.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Confirm diagnosis: MRI whole spine with gadolinium shows well-defined enhancing lesion, homogeneous enhancement, polar syrinx - classic for ependymoma
Pre-operative assessment: baseline neurological exam (McCormick grade), consent for neurological deterioration risk (20-30%), realistic expectations for recovery
Surgical plan: wide laminectomy C3-C7 (1 level above and below tumor), preserve facets to avoid instability, posterior median sulcus myelotomy
Intraoperative neuromonitoring: SSEP and MEP essential; guides extent of safe resection
Resection strategy: identify tumor-cord plane (present in 90% of ependymomas), circumferential dissection, drain rostral syrinx if symptomatic, aim for GTR
Post-operative care: ICU monitoring 24-48 hours, maintain MAP greater than 85 mmHg, dexamethasone taper, early mobilization with physiotherapy
Surveillance: MRI at 3 months for baseline, then 6-monthly for 2 years, annually thereafter
Expected outcomes: GTR achievable in 80-90%, 10-year PFS 80%, transient neurological worsening in 20% with recovery in majority
COMMON TRAPS
✗Inadequate laminectomy exposure - need 1 level above and below tumor for adequate visualization
✗Attempting lateral myelotomy - higher risk of corticospinal tract injury; always use posterior median sulcus
✗Aggressive resection despite MEP changes - risk permanent motor deficit; must respect neuromonitoring
✗Failing to address syrinx - most syringes resolve after tumor resection; separate shunting rarely needed
✗Excessive facet resection - greater than 50% facet removal risks kyphotic deformity requiring fusion
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if MEP amplitude dropped by 60% during resection? (Stop resection, irrigate with warm saline, reduce retraction pressure, increase MAP, consider abandoning further resection if no recovery)"
"How would you manage post-operative neurological deterioration? (Urgent MRI to exclude hematoma, maintain high MAP, high-dose steroids, if hematoma present then emergency evacuation)"
"What if only subtotal resection achieved? (Accept if further resection risks major deficit; consider adjuvant radiotherapy; closer surveillance imaging every 3-4 months)"
"When would you consider fusion? (If greater than 50% facet resection, pre-existing kyphosis, pediatric patient, multilevel laminectomy C3-C7)"
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Scenario 2: Thoracic Hemangioblastoma

EXAMINER

""

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has a spinal hemangioblastoma at T6, likely associated with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome given his previous cerebellar hemangioblastoma. The progressive myelopathy is an indication for surgical resection. Hemangioblastomas are highly vascular but have a good surgical plane, allowing GTR in most cases if feeding vessels are controlled first.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
VHL screening: genetic testing, MRI brain (cerebellar hemangioblastomas), retinal examination (retinal angiomas), abdominal imaging (renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic lesions)
Surgical approach: T5-T7 laminectomy, posterior median sulcus myelotomy to access dorsal tumor
Key surgical principles for hemangioblastoma: identify and coagulate feeding arteries FIRST before manipulating tumor, circumferential dissection of nodule from cord, en bloc resection of nodule
Intraoperative neuromonitoring: SSEP and MEP to guide safe resection
Syrinx management: usually resolves after tumor resection, drain at time of surgery only if tense and symptomatic
Post-operative imaging: MRI at 3 months to confirm GTR and syrinx resolution
Long-term surveillance: annual MRI whole spine (VHL patients develop new tumors in 35% at 5 years)
Family screening: first-degree relatives should be offered genetic testing for VHL
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting to debulk tumor before vascular control - causes torrential bleeding; always control feeders first
✗Missing VHL diagnosis - requires systemic screening and family counseling
✗Attempting syrinx drainage without addressing tumor - syrinx is secondary to tumor; resect tumor first
✗Inadequate long-term surveillance - VHL patients need lifelong annual imaging for new tumors
✗Not considering observation - if tumor asymptomatic in VHL patient, observation with serial MRI is reasonable (reserve surgery for symptomatic or enlarging tumors)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the inheritance pattern of VHL and what is the risk to offspring? (Autosomal dominant, 50% risk to offspring, variable penetrance)"
"How would you manage an asymptomatic 1 cm hemangioblastoma incidentally found in a VHL patient? (Observation with 6-month MRI surveillance; surgery reserved for symptomatic or enlarging lesions)"
"What are the other manifestations of VHL syndrome? (CNS: cerebellar and spinal hemangioblastomas; Renal: renal cell carcinoma, renal cysts; Pancreatic: cysts and neuroendocrine tumors; Retinal angiomas; Endolymphatic sac tumors)"
"If GTR not achieved, what would you recommend? (Close surveillance with 3-4 month MRI intervals; consider re-resection if growth; radiotherapy controversial for benign tumor but option for residual/recurrent disease)"

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Intramedullary Tumors
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Intramedullary TumorsCredit: OrthoVellum

High-Yield Exam Summary

Quick Recognition

  • •Progressive myelopathy + MRI cord expansion with intramedullary enhancement = IMSCT
  • •Ependymoma 60% (well-defined, cervical, polar syrinx)
  • •Astrocytoma 30% (infiltrative, thoracic, indistinct margins)
  • •Hemangioblastoma 3-5% (vascular, dorsal, VHL association)

Essential MRI Features

  • •Ependymoma: intense homogeneous enhancement, well-defined, polar cysts/syrinx
  • •Astrocytoma: patchy heterogeneous enhancement, poorly defined, infiltrative
  • •Hemangioblastoma: intense nodule enhancement, flow voids, large syrinx, hemosiderin cap

Surgical Principles

  • •Wide laminectomy (1 level above/below)
  • •Preserve less than 50% of facets (avoid instability)
  • •Posterior median sulcus myelotomy (avascular plane)
  • •Intraoperative SSEP+MEP monitoring mandatory
  • •Goal: GTR for ependymoma/hemangioblastoma, maximal safe resection for astrocytoma

Ependymoma Strategy

  • •Best prognosis tumor, well-defined plane in 90%
  • •Circumferential dissection along tumor-cord interface
  • •GTR achievable in 80-90%
  • •10-year PFS 80% with GTR vs 45% with STR
  • •Adjuvant XRT for STR or anaplastic (Grade III)

Astrocytoma Strategy

  • •Infiltrative, no clear plane
  • •Internal debulking first, subtotal resection to functional boundaries
  • •GTR rarely achievable (less than 20%)
  • •Stop resection if MEP changes
  • •Adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide for high-grade (Grade III-IV)

Hemangioblastoma Strategy

  • •Highly vascular - control feeders FIRST before manipulating tumor
  • •Pial-based, good plane, en bloc resection of nodule
  • •Screen for VHL (25% of cases)
  • •VHL: annual MRI surveillance, family screening
  • •Observe asymptomatic tumors in VHL

Neuromonitoring Alerts

  • •MEP drop greater than 50% = high risk of motor deficit
  • •Action: pause resection, warm saline irrigation, reduce retraction, increase MAP
  • •If no recovery, abandon further resection
  • •SSEP less sensitive for sensory deficits
  • •Combined SSEP+MEP superior to either alone

Complications

  • •Neurological deterioration 15-30% (68% recover by 6 months)
  • •Epidural hematoma 2-5% (emergency re-exploration)
  • •CSF leak 5-10% (bed rest, re-closure if persistent)
  • •Infection 1-5% (meningitis or wound)
  • •Instability if greater than 50% facet resection

Post-Op Management

  • •ICU 24-48 hours, neuro checks Q2H
  • •Maintain MAP greater than 85 mmHg for cord perfusion
  • •Dexamethasone taper over 1 week
  • •Flat bed rest 48 hours (reduce CSF leak)
  • •Mobilize day 3 with PT, MRI at 3 months baseline then 6-monthly for 2 years

Viva Talking Points

  • •GTR is goal for ependymoma - best long-term outcomes (10-year PFS 80%)
  • •Intraoperative neuromonitoring mandatory - guides safe resection extent
  • •Temporary neurological worsening common (22%) but majority recover
  • •VHL screening essential for hemangioblastoma
  • •Posterior median sulcus myelotomy is safest approach

References

  1. Samartzis D, Gillis CC, Shih P, et al. Intramedullary spinal cord tumors: part I--epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Global Spine J. 2015;5(5):425-435.

  2. Samartzis D, Gillis CC, Shih P, et al. Intramedullary spinal cord tumors: part II--management options and outcomes. Global Spine J. 2016;6(2):176-185.

  3. Lonser RR, Weil RJ, Wanebo JE, et al. Surgical management of spinal cord hemangioblastomas in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(1):106-116.

  4. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Gulati M, Lyon R, et al. Spinal cord mapping as an adjunct for resection of intramedullary tumors: surgical technique with case illustrations. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5):1199-1206.

  5. McGirt MJ, Goldstein IM, Chaichana KL, et al. Extent of surgical resection of malignant astrocytomas of the spinal cord: outcome analysis of 35 patients. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(1):55-60.

  6. Innocenzi G, Salvati M, Artizzu S, et al. Prognostic factors in intramedullary astrocytomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1997;99(1):1-5.

  7. McCormick PC, Torres R, Post KD, Stein BM. Intramedullary ependymoma of the spinal cord. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(4):523-532.

  8. Jallo GI, Freed D, Epstein FJ. Intramedullary spinal cord tumors in children. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(9):641-649.

This comprehensive topic provides Gold Standard coverage of intramedullary spinal cord tumors for FRACS examination preparation, emphasizing surgical technique, decision-making, and evidence-based outcomes.

Quick Stats
Reading Time83 min
Related Topics

Atlantoaxial Arthritis

Baastrup Disease (Kissing Spine Syndrome)

Bertolotti Syndrome (Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra)

Cervical Facet Arthropathy