Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Intraosseous Lipoma

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Intraosseous Lipoma

Rare benign intramedullary fat-containing tumor with classic central calcification

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

INTRAOSSEOUS LIPOMA

Rare Benign Fat-Containing Bone Tumor | Classic Central Calcification | Calcaneus Most Common Site

Under 0.1%of all bone tumors
40-60 yrspeak age incidence
60%occur in calcaneus
100%benign - no malignant potential

MILGRAM CLASSIFICATION

Stage 1
PatternViable fat without necrosis
TreatmentObservation or simple curettage
Stage 2
PatternFat necrosis with calcification
TreatmentCurettage with bone graft
Stage 3
PatternCalcification with cyst formation
TreatmentCurettage with graft, may mimic other lesions

Critical Must-Knows

  • Calcaneus is the most common site - accounts for 60% of all intraosseous lipomas
  • Central calcification on X-ray is pathognomonic - radiolucent lesion with dense central nidus
  • MRI shows fat signal on all sequences - diagnostic feature distinguishing from other lucent lesions
  • Completely benign - no malignant potential and excellent prognosis with simple curettage
  • Milgram staging based on degree of fat necrosis and calcification, not biological behavior

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Examiners love the central calcification pattern - it's pathognomonic for intraosseous lipoma
  • "
    Fat signal on MRI (high T1, low T2 with fat suppression) clinches the diagnosis
  • "
    Distinguish from bone infarct - infarcts have serpentine peripheral calcification, lipomas have central calcification
  • "
    Simple curettage is curative - no wide margins needed as this is completely benign

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Two-panel lateral calcaneus radiographs demonstrating well-defined radiolucent lesion with pathognomonic central dense calcific nidus - classic appearance of intraosseous lipoma
Click to expand
Two-panel lateral calcaneus radiographs demonstrating well-defined radiolucent lesion with pathognomonic central dense calcific nidus - classic appearCredit: Mhuircheartaigh JN et al. via Indian J Radiol Imaging via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Two-panel image showing lateral X-ray and sagittal CT of calcaneus with cystic lesion containing central calcification (Ward's triangle) and fat density on CT
Click to expand
Two-panel image showing lateral X-ray and sagittal CT of calcaneus with cystic lesion containing central calcification (Ward's triangle) and fat densiCredit: Palczewski P et al. via Pol J Radiol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Three-panel multimodality imaging (plain radiography, sagittal CT, T1-weighted sagittal MRI) showing calcaneal osteolytic lesion with central calcification and characteristic fat signal
Click to expand
Three-panel multimodality imaging (plain radiography, sagittal CT, T1-weighted sagittal MRI) showing calcaneal osteolytic lesion with central calcificCredit: Toepfer A et al. via Springerplus via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Two-panel knee radiographs (AP and lateral) demonstrating cystic lesion in lateral femoral condyle with sclerotic rim - illustrates second most common location for intraosseous lipoma
Click to expand
Two-panel knee radiographs (AP and lateral) demonstrating cystic lesion in lateral femoral condyle with sclerotic rim - illustrates second most commonCredit: Palczewski P et al. via Pol J Radiol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Intraosseous Lipoma Exam Points

Pathognomonic Imaging

Central calcification on X-ray - radiolucent lesion with dense central nidus of calcification. This is the classic radiographic appearance distinguishing lipoma from other lucent lesions.

MRI Fat Signal

High T1 signal that suppresses with fat saturation. This confirms fat content and distinguishes intraosseous lipoma from other radiolucent lesions like SBC or UBC.

Calcaneus Predilection

60% occur in calcaneus followed by proximal femur (20%). Rare in other sites. Think intraosseous lipoma for any lucent calcaneal lesion with central calcification.

Benign Biology

Completely benign with no malignant potential. Simple curettage is curative. Recurrence is rare (under 5%) and indicates incomplete excision.

Quick Decision Guide

PresentationImaging FeaturesManagementKey Pearl
Asymptomatic, incidental findingRadiolucent with central calcification, fat on MRIObservation - no treatment neededBenign, no growth potential
Mild pain, no fracture riskSmall lesion, intact cortexConservative - analgesia, activity modificationMost never become symptomatic
Persistent pain, large lesionCortical thinning, pathological fracture riskCurettage with bone graft or substituteSimple curettage is curative
Mnemonic

FAT CALCClassic Features of Intraosseous Lipoma

F
Fat signal on MRI
High T1, suppresses with fat saturation sequences
A
Asymptomatic usually
Most found incidentally, minority have pain
T
Trabeculated radiolucent lesion
Geographic lytic lesion with intact cortex
C
Calcaneus most common
60% occur in calcaneus, 20% proximal femur
A
Adult age 40-60 years
Peak incidence in middle age, rare in children
L
Lucent with central calcification
Pathognomonic - radiolucent lesion with dense central nidus
C
Curettage is curative
Simple treatment, no wide margins needed

Memory Hook:FAT CALC - the FAT shows CALCification! This describes the classic central calcification in a fat-containing lesion.

Mnemonic

STAGE 1-2-3Milgram Histological Staging

S
Stage 1 = Simple fat
Viable adipose tissue without necrosis or calcification
T
Two = Transitional necrosis
Stage 2: Fat necrosis with focal calcification
A
Advanced = Stage 3
Extensive calcification with cyst formation
G
Grading does not affect prognosis
All stages benign, staging reflects involution not malignancy
E
Evolution from fat to calcification
Natural progression from Stage 1 to Stage 3 over time

Memory Hook:Stages progress from Simple fat (Stage 1) to Transitional necrosis (Stage 2) to Advanced calcification (Stage 3). All are benign!

Mnemonic

SAULICDifferential Diagnosis of Radiolucent Calcaneal Lesions

S
Simple bone cyst
No central calcification, younger age
A
Aneurysmal bone cyst
Expansile, fluid-fluid levels on MRI
U
Unicameral bone cyst
Fallen fragment sign, no fat signal
L
Lipoma (intraosseous)
Central calcification, fat on MRI - the diagnosis!
I
Infarct (bone)
Serpentine peripheral calcification, different from central
C
Chondroblastoma
Rare in calcaneus, younger age, painful

Memory Hook:SAULIC covers the differential for lucent calcaneal lesions - Lipoma has central calcification and fat signal!

Overview and Epidemiology

Clinical Significance

Intraosseous lipoma is a rare benign tumor composed of mature adipose tissue within the medullary cavity of bone. Despite being uncommon (under 0.1% of all bone tumors), it has a characteristic imaging appearance that makes it an important diagnosis to recognize. The pathognomonic central calcification on radiographs and fat signal on MRI allow confident diagnosis without biopsy in most cases.

Demographics

  • Age: 40-60 years (middle-aged adults)
  • Gender: Equal distribution (no gender predilection)
  • Rare in children: Under 5% of cases
  • Usually solitary: Multiple lipomas exceptionally rare

Anatomical Distribution

  • Calcaneus: 60% (most common site by far)
  • Proximal femur: 20% (intertrochanteric region)
  • Tibia: 5% (proximal metaphysis)
  • Fibula, ribs, skull: Rare (under 5% each)
  • Never in spine: Unlike soft tissue lipomas

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Origin and Histogenesis

The exact origin of intraosseous lipoma is unknown. Several theories have been proposed:

Metaplasia Theory

Most accepted theory: Metaplastic transformation of bone marrow mesenchymal cells to adipocytes in response to:

  • Trauma or microtrauma
  • Ischemia or infarction
  • Unknown stimulus

Developmental Theory

Alternative theory: Congenital nidus of ectopic fat cells that slowly expands over time.

Less favored as most cases present in adulthood, not childhood.

Milgram Histological Classification

The Milgram staging system classifies intraosseous lipomas based on histological features reflecting the natural evolution from viable fat to necrosis and calcification.

StageHistologyRadiographic AppearanceClinical Significance
Stage 1Viable adipose tissue onlyRadiolucent, no calcificationEarly lesion, purely fatty
Stage 2Fat necrosis with focal calcificationRadiolucent with central calcificationClassic appearance - most common
Stage 3Extensive calcification and cyst formationHeavily calcified, may mimic bone infarctAdvanced involution, difficult to diagnose

Staging Does Not Indicate Malignancy

Important concept: The Milgram staging system reflects the natural involution of the lipoma from viable fat to necrotic calcified tissue. It does NOT indicate biological behavior or malignant potential. All stages are equally benign.

Why Central Calcification?

The characteristic central calcification occurs due to:

  1. Fat necrosis in the center of the lesion (ischemia or outgrowth of blood supply)
  2. Dystrophic calcification of necrotic fat cells
  3. Progressive calcification from center outward as lesion involutes

This contrasts with bone infarct, which shows peripheral serpentine calcification delineating the infarct margin.

Classification and Staging

Milgram Histological Classification (1988)

Gold standard for intraosseous lipoma classification based on histological appearance.

Stages and Natural History

Early LesionStage 1 - Viable Fat

Histology: Mature adipose tissue with intact cell membranes, normal nuclei, and viable fat cells.

Radiology: Purely radiolucent lesion, no calcification visible.

Prevalence: Uncommon (10-15% of cases) - most lesions progress to Stage 2 before clinical detection.

Classic LesionStage 2 - Necrosis and Calcification

Histology: Viable fat at periphery, central fat necrosis with dystrophic calcification.

Radiology: Radiolucent lesion with central calcification - pathognomonic appearance.

Prevalence: Most common (60-70% of cases) - this is the classic imaging appearance.

Involuted LesionStage 3 - Advanced Calcification

Histology: Extensive calcification, minimal residual fat, cyst formation, reactive bone.

Radiology: Heavily calcified lesion, may mimic bone infarct or enchondroma.

Prevalence: Less common (20-25%) - advanced involution, difficult diagnosis.

Stage 2 is Classic

Stage 2 lesions represent the classic intraosseous lipoma with pathognomonic central calcification on X-ray. This is the most commonly encountered stage and the easiest to diagnose radiographically. Stage 1 (no calcification) and Stage 3 (extensive calcification) can be more challenging to recognize.

Classification by Location

LocationFrequencyClinical FeaturesManagement Considerations
Calcaneus60% of casesUsually asymptomatic, found incidentally or with heel painObservation unless symptomatic; curettage if painful
Proximal femur20% of casesIntertrochanteric region, risk of pathological fracture if largeConsider prophylactic curettage if cortical thinning
Tibia (proximal)5% of casesMetaphyseal location, usually asymptomaticObservation unless symptomatic
Other sites15% of casesFibula, ribs, skull, ilium - very rareCase-by-case management

Why Calcaneus?

The calcaneus predilection (60% of cases) is unexplained but possibly related to:

  • High proportion of fatty marrow in calcaneus
  • Repetitive microtrauma from weight-bearing
  • Vascular anatomy predisposing to focal ischemia

Regardless of mechanism, calcaneus is the first site to consider when you see an intraosseous lipoma.

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

  • Asymptomatic: 50-70% (incidental finding on imaging)
  • Pain: 30-50% - dull, aching, activity-related
  • No systemic symptoms: Never presents with fever, weight loss, malaise
  • Pathological fracture: Rare (under 5%) but possible if large lesion with cortical thinning

Duration

  • Chronic pain: Months to years if symptomatic
  • Stable size: No progressive enlargement (unlike malignant lesions)
  • Incidental discovery: Often found during imaging for other reasons
  • Slow involution: May calcify and become more apparent over years

Physical Examination

Inspection and Palpation

  • No visible swelling: Intramedullary location prevents external mass
  • No skin changes: No erythema, warmth, or overlying soft tissue abnormality
  • Tenderness: May have mild focal tenderness over lesion site
  • Normal neurovascular exam: No nerve or vessel involvement

Functional Assessment

  • Full range of motion: Adjacent joints unaffected
  • Normal gait: If calcaneal, may have antalgic gait if painful
  • No deformity: Unless pathological fracture occurred
  • Weight-bearing: Tolerated unless fracture or severe pain

Red Flags Against Intraosseous Lipoma

These features suggest alternative diagnosis:

  • Rapid growth or increasing size (consider malignancy)
  • Soft tissue mass extending beyond bone (not characteristic of intraosseous lipoma)
  • Systemic symptoms (fever, weight loss - consider infection or malignancy)
  • Pathological fracture through aggressive-appearing lesion (reassess diagnosis)

Clinical Scenarios

Common Presentations

ScenarioTypical PatientImaging IndicationManagement
Incidental finding50-year-old, ankle X-ray for sprainX-ray shows lucent calcaneal lesion with central calcificationReassure patient, no treatment needed
Chronic heel pain45-year-old with 6 months heel pain, no traumaMRI confirms fat signal lesion in calcaneusTrial conservative management, consider curettage if persistent
Proximal femur lesion60-year-old with hip pain, large lesion with cortical thinningMRI shows fat signal, concern for fracture riskConsider prophylactic curettage with bone graft

Imaging and Diagnosis

Plain Radiographs

Classic appearance of calcaneal intraosseous lipoma with central calcification
Click to expand
Two-panel lateral calcaneus radiographs demonstrating the pathognomonic appearance of intraosseous lipoma. Panel A shows a well-defined radiolucent lesion in the calcaneus (arrows mark margins). Panel B reveals the diagnostic feature: a dense central calcific nidus (arrows and arrowhead) within the lucent lesion. This central calcification pattern distinguishes intraosseous lipoma from bone infarct (which has peripheral serpentine calcification).Credit: Mhuircheartaigh JN et al. via Indian J Radiol Imaging via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
X-ray and CT correlation of calcaneal intraosseous lipoma
Click to expand
Two-panel multimodality correlation of calcaneal intraosseous lipoma. Panel A shows lateral foot X-ray with radiolucent lesion and central calcification in Ward's triangle region of calcaneus. Panel B demonstrates sagittal CT confirming fat density (-40 to -120 HU) within the lesion and clearly delineating the central calcific nidus. CT is useful for surgical planning to assess cortical integrity.Credit: Palczewski P et al. via Pol J Radiol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Multimodality imaging demonstrating diagnostic features of calcaneal lipoma
Click to expand
Three-panel multimodality imaging of calcaneal intraosseous lipoma. Left panel: plain radiography shows osteolytic lesion with central calcification. Center panel: sagittal CT demonstrates fat density and well-defined margins. Right panel: T1-weighted sagittal MRI reveals high signal intensity matching subcutaneous fat - the gold standard diagnostic feature. The high T1 signal that suppresses with fat saturation sequences confirms fat content.Credit: Toepfer A et al. via Springerplus via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Distal femur intraosseous lipoma - second most common location
Click to expand
Two-panel knee radiographs (AP and lateral views) demonstrating intraosseous lipoma in the lateral femoral condyle. The cystic lesion shows characteristic central calcification and is surrounded by a sclerotic rim. This illustrates the second most common anatomic location for intraosseous lipoma (proximal femur 20%) after calcaneus (60%). The radiographic features are identical regardless of location.Credit: Palczewski P et al. via Pol J Radiol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Radiographic Features

Primary FeatureGeographic Lucent Lesion

Well-defined radiolucent lesion with narrow zone of transition. Geographic Type IA or IB (Lodwick classification).

Located in metaphysis or diaphysis of long bones, or within calcaneus body.

PathognomonicCentral Calcification

Dense central nidus of calcification within the lucent lesion. This is the PATHOGNOMONIC feature.

Calcification is typically round or oval, centrally located, distinct from peripheral rim calcification of bone infarct.

Benign FeatureIntact Cortex

Cortex is intact or mildly thinned but not destroyed. No periosteal reaction unless pathological fracture.

Sclerotic rim may be present at margin between lesion and normal bone.

Confined to BoneNo Soft Tissue Mass

No extension beyond bone cortex. Intraosseous lipomas are purely intramedullary.

Central vs Peripheral Calcification

Distinguish intraosseous lipoma from bone infarct:

  • Intraosseous lipoma: Central round/oval calcification (fat necrosis)
  • Bone infarct: Peripheral serpentine calcification (geographic map pattern outlining infarct)

This is a classic exam distinction!

MRI - Gold Standard for Diagnosis

Fat Signal Characteristics

Diagnostic feature: Signal identical to subcutaneous fat on all sequences.

  • T1-weighted: High signal (bright)
  • T2-weighted: Intermediate to high signal
  • STIR/Fat saturation: Signal SUPPRESSES completely
  • No enhancement: Fat does not enhance with gadolinium

Additional MRI Features

  • Central calcification: Low signal nidus on all sequences
  • Well-defined margins: Smooth interface with normal marrow
  • No soft tissue extension: Confined within bone cortex
  • No edema: Surrounding bone marrow normal (unless fracture)

Fat Suppression Confirms Diagnosis

The key to MRI diagnosis is demonstrating that the high T1 signal SUPPRESSES with fat saturation sequences (STIR or fat-sat T2). This proves the lesion contains fat, distinguishing it from other T1 hyperintense lesions like hemorrhage or proteinaceous cyst fluid.

CT Scan

CT is rarely needed but may show:

  • Fat density (-40 to -120 Hounsfield units)
  • Central calcification well-delineated
  • Cortical integrity assessment

CT is useful for surgical planning if curettage planned, to assess cortical thinning and structural integrity.

Differential Diagnosis

ConditionKey Distinguishing FeatureImaging Clue
Bone infarctPeripheral serpentine calcificationGeographic map pattern at periphery, NOT central
Simple bone cystNo central calcification, younger ageFallen fragment sign, fluid signal on MRI
Aneurysmal bone cystExpansile, fluid-fluid levelsBlow-out appearance, hemorrhagic fluid on MRI
EnchondromaChondroid matrix calcificationRings and arcs calcification, no fat signal
Fibrous dysplasiaGround-glass matrix, no fat signalExpansile, no central calcification pattern

When to Biopsy

Biopsy is RARELY needed if imaging is classic (central calcification on X-ray, fat signal on MRI).

Observation Without Biopsy

Classic imaging features allow confident diagnosis:

  • Radiolucent lesion with central calcification
  • Fat signal on MRI (high T1, suppresses with fat-sat)
  • Typical location (calcaneus, proximal femur)
  • Middle-aged patient

Consider Biopsy If

Atypical features raise diagnostic doubt:

  • No fat signal on MRI (not a lipoma)
  • Aggressive features (cortical destruction, soft tissue mass)
  • Rapid growth or change in appearance
  • Patient symptoms out of proportion to imaging

Pathology

Gross Pathology

Macroscopic appearance: Yellow, greasy, soft tissue indistinguishable from normal adipose tissue. May have areas of white chalky calcification (fat necrosis).

Size: Typically 2-5 cm diameter, rarely larger.

Histology

Microscopic Features

  • Mature adipocytes: Large cells with single lipid vacuole displacing nucleus to periphery
  • Minimal atypia: Cells look like normal fat
  • Fat necrosis (Stage 2-3): Ghost cells, loss of cell membranes
  • Dystrophic calcification: Calcium deposits in necrotic fat
  • Reactive bone: Woven bone at periphery in some cases

Differential Histology

Distinguish from:

  • Normal marrow fat: Lipoma is expansile mass, not just fatty marrow
  • Liposarcoma: Lipoblasts (cells with scalloped hyperchromatic nuclei), not present in benign lipoma
  • Bone infarct: Geographic necrosis of bone and marrow, calcification at periphery

Histology Pearl

Histologically, intraosseous lipoma is indistinguishable from soft tissue lipoma - both show mature adipose tissue. The key is the intramedullary location within bone and the central calcification pattern that is unique to intraosseous lipoma.

Management and Treatment

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Intraosseous Lipoma
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Intraosseous LipomaCredit: OrthoVellum

Observation Protocol

Indications for observation:

  • Asymptomatic lesion discovered incidentally
  • Classic imaging appearance (no diagnostic uncertainty)
  • Small size with no risk of pathological fracture
  • Patient preference to avoid surgery

Surveillance Schedule

6 monthsInitial Follow-up

Repeat X-ray at 6 months to confirm stability. Intraosseous lipomas do not grow.

12 monthsConfirm Stability

If stable at 6 months, repeat X-ray at 1 year. If still stable, discharge from follow-up.

OngoingPatient Education

Educate patient that this is benign. Advise to return if new pain or symptoms develop.

When to Observe

Most intraosseous lipomas can be observed without treatment. Surgery is only indicated for symptomatic lesions or those with fracture risk. Asymptomatic incidental lesions require only reassurance and brief radiographic follow-up to confirm stability.

Surgical Management

Indications for surgery:

  • Persistent pain unresponsive to conservative measures
  • Pathological fracture or imminent fracture risk
  • Large lesion with cortical thinning (prophylactic treatment)
  • Diagnostic uncertainty (biopsy and curettage)

Surgical Technique - Curettage

Step 1Approach

Direct approach to lesion through cortical window.

  • Small cortical window with curette or drill
  • Preserve structural integrity of bone
  • Avoid neurovascular structures
Step 2Curettage

Thorough curettage of lesion contents.

  • Remove all fatty tissue and calcification
  • Curette walls to ensure complete excision
  • Send specimen for histology (confirm diagnosis)
Step 3Bone Grafting

Fill cavity with bone graft if large defect.

  • Autograft: Iliac crest for structural defects
  • Allograft: Cancellous chips for small defects
  • Bone substitute: Calcium phosphate or sulfate
Step 4Closure

Irrigate wound, close soft tissues in layers. No drain usually needed for small defects.

Complete Curettage Important

Recurrence is rare (under 5%) but occurs when curettage is incomplete. Ensure thorough curettage of all walls. However, aggressive extended curettage (phenol, burr) is NOT needed as this is a benign lesion with no malignant potential.

Site-Specific Considerations

LocationSurgical ApproachGraft Needed?Special Considerations
CalcaneusLateral approach below peroneal tendonsUsually yes - to restore structural integrityProtect sural nerve; avoid plantar medial neurovascular bundle
Proximal femurLateral approach to intertrochanteric regionYes - autograft preferred for structural supportRisk of subtrochanteric fracture if large defect; may need prophylactic fixation
Tibia (proximal)Anteromedial or anterolateral approachDepends on size - small defects can heal without graftAvoid popliteal vessels posteriorly

Prophylactic Fixation

Consider prophylactic internal fixation if:

  • Large lesion (greater than 50% of bone diameter)
  • Significant cortical thinning after curettage
  • Weight-bearing bone (proximal femur, tibia)
  • High fracture risk location (femoral neck, subtrochanteric)

Fixation options: Intramedullary nail, plate and screws, or percutaneous screws depending on location.

Postoperative Care

Post-Curettage Rehabilitation Protocol

ImmediateWeek 0-2

Wound care and dressing changes. Weight-bearing status depends on site: calcaneus - partial weight-bearing in boot; proximal femur - protected weight-bearing with crutches.

EarlyWeek 2-6

Suture removal at 2 weeks. Progressive weight-bearing as tolerated. X-ray at 6 weeks to assess graft incorporation.

IntermediateWeek 6-12

Full weight-bearing for most patients. Transition to normal footwear (calcaneus). Resume light activities.

Late3-6 months

Return to full activity including sports. Final X-ray to confirm healing and no recurrence. Discharge if stable.

Follow-up Protocol

  • X-ray at 6 weeks and 3 months post-curettage
  • Annual follow-up not required for confirmed benign lipoma
  • Recurrence is rare (under 5%) - patient can be reassured

Outcomes and Prognosis

Surgical Outcomes

Curettage with or without bone graft is curative in over 95% of cases.

Expected Outcomes

  • Pain resolution: 95% of patients have complete pain relief
  • No recurrence: Under 5% recurrence rate with complete curettage
  • Bone healing: Grafted defects heal within 6-12 weeks
  • Return to activity: Full activity by 3-6 months post-op

Potential Complications

  • Recurrence: Under 5% (incomplete curettage)
  • Wound infection: Standard surgical site infection rates (2-3%)
  • Pathological fracture: Rare if prophylactic measures taken
  • Nerve injury: Site-specific (sural nerve in calcaneus)

Long-term Prognosis

Excellent. Intraosseous lipoma is completely benign with no malignant potential.

  • No malignant transformation: Never reported
  • No metastases: Does not metastasize
  • No growth: Stable size, does not enlarge
  • Natural involution: May calcify and involute (Stage 2 to Stage 3)

Prognosis Pearl

The prognosis is 100% excellent. This is a completely benign lesion with no malignant potential. Simple curettage is curative, and recurrence is rare. Patients can be confidently reassured that this is not cancer and will not become cancer.

Complications

Surgical Complications

ComplicationIncidencePreventionManagement
RecurrenceUnder 5%Complete curettage of all wallsRe-curettage if symptomatic recurrence
Pathological fractureRare (under 3%)Prophylactic fixation if large lesion with cortical thinningORIF with bone graft
Wound infection2-3%Standard sterile technique, prophylactic antibioticsAntibiotics, irrigation and debridement if deep infection
Nerve injuryUnder 2%Careful approach avoiding neurovascular structuresObservation for neuropraxia, exploration if transection suspected

Disease-Related Complications

Natural History Complications

  • Pathological fracture: Rare (under 5%), occurs with large lesions and cortical thinning
  • Chronic pain: Mechanism unclear, may be due to microfractures or pressure
  • No systemic complications: Does not affect other organs

No Long-term Risks

  • No malignant transformation: Never reported in literature
  • No recurrence after observation: Lesions do not grow
  • No metastases: Does not spread
  • No death: Never causes mortality

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Milgram Classification of Intraosseous Lipoma

4
Milgram JW • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1988)
Key Findings:
  • Landmark classification system based on 55 cases of intraosseous lipoma
  • Three stages based on histological appearance: viable fat (Stage 1), fat necrosis with calcification (Stage 2), extensive calcification (Stage 3)
  • Stage 2 most common (60-70%), representing the classic central calcification pattern
  • All stages are benign - staging reflects involution, not biological behavior
Clinical Implication: Established the Milgram classification still used today. Emphasized that all stages are benign and staging is descriptive, not prognostic.
Limitation: Case series from single institution; no long-term follow-up outcomes data.

Radiological Features of Intraosseous Lipoma

4
Campbell RS, Grainger AJ, Mangham DC • Clinical Radiology (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Review of imaging features in 21 cases of intraosseous lipoma
  • Central calcification present in 81% of cases on radiographs (pathognomonic when present)
  • MRI shows fat signal (high T1, suppresses with fat saturation) in 100% of cases
  • Calcaneus was most common site (62%), followed by proximal femur (24%)
Clinical Implication: MRI with fat saturation sequences is diagnostic - fat signal confirms diagnosis and biopsy can be avoided in classic cases.
Limitation: Retrospective review; small case series.

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Intraosseous Lipoma

4
Propeck T, Bullard MA, Lin J • American Journal of Roentgenology (2000)
Key Findings:
  • Case series of 16 intraosseous lipomas treated surgically
  • Simple curettage curative in all cases (100% success rate)
  • No recurrences with mean follow-up of 4.2 years
  • Bone grafting recommended for large defects to prevent pathological fracture
Clinical Implication: Simple curettage with bone graft is curative treatment. Extended curettage or wide resection not needed.
Limitation: Small series, retrospective; no comparison with observation alone.

Intraosseous Lipoma: Report of 35 Cases and Review

4
Murphey MD, Johnson DL, Bhatia PS • American Journal of Roentgenology (1993)
Key Findings:
  • Largest radiologic series analyzing 35 cases of intraosseous lipoma
  • Calcaneus most common location (60%), followed by proximal femur and tibia
  • Central calcification present in 81% of cases - pathognomonic when present
  • MRI diagnostic in all cases - fat signal (high T1, suppresses with fat saturation)
Clinical Implication: Established the imaging criteria that allow confident diagnosis without biopsy. MRI with fat saturation sequences is the gold standard.
Limitation: Retrospective imaging review; variable clinical follow-up.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Incidental Calcaneal Lesion

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old woman presents after ankle sprain. X-ray shows a well-defined radiolucent lesion in the calcaneus with a central dense calcification. She has no heel pain. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This imaging appearance is pathognomonic for intraosseous lipoma. The key features are: radiolucent lesion with central calcification in the calcaneus (most common site - 60% of intraosseous lipomas). The central calcification distinguishes this from other lucent lesions like simple bone cyst. I would confirm the diagnosis with MRI showing fat signal - high T1 signal that suppresses with fat saturation sequences. This would demonstrate fat content and avoid need for biopsy. Given the patient is asymptomatic and the diagnosis is clear, my management is observation with reassurance. I would explain this is a completely benign lesion with no malignant potential. I would obtain a follow-up X-ray at 6 months to confirm stability, then discharge if stable. No treatment is needed for asymptomatic lesions. I would counsel the patient to return if new pain develops, but this is unlikely as these lesions do not grow.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Identify pathognomonic central calcification pattern
State that calcaneus is the most common site (60%)
MRI shows fat signal - diagnostic and avoids biopsy
Asymptomatic lesions can be observed - no treatment needed
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending biopsy for classic imaging - unnecessary if MRI confirms fat signal
✗Recommending surgery for asymptomatic lesion - observation is appropriate
✗Confusing with bone infarct (peripheral calcification, not central)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Milgram classification and does it affect management?"
"How do you distinguish intraosseous lipoma from bone infarct on X-ray?"
"What are the indications for surgical treatment?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Proximal Femur Lesion with Fracture Risk

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old man presents with 6 months of hip pain. Imaging shows a 5cm radiolucent lesion in the intertrochanteric region of the proximal femur with central calcification and significant cortical thinning. MRI confirms fat signal. How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an intraosseous lipoma of the proximal femur - classic imaging with central calcification and fat signal on MRI. However, there are concerning features: large size (5cm), significant cortical thinning, and location in a weight-bearing area of the proximal femur. This creates risk of pathological fracture. My management approach: First, counsel patient about diagnosis - this is benign but requires treatment due to fracture risk. Second, surgical management is indicated - I would perform curettage and bone grafting to restore structural integrity. Approach would be lateral to the intertrochanteric region. Third, I would strongly consider prophylactic internal fixation given the large size and cortical thinning. Options include dynamic hip screw or intramedullary nail depending on exact extent. Fourth, bone graft: I would use structural autograft from iliac crest to fill the 5cm defect and provide immediate support. Fifth, postoperative protocol: protected weight-bearing for 6-12 weeks until graft incorporates, then gradual return to full activity. I would follow radiographically to ensure healing and no recurrence.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize fracture risk with large lesion and cortical thinning
Surgical treatment indicated even though lesion is benign
Consider prophylactic fixation in weight-bearing bones
Structural bone graft needed for large defects (5cm)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending observation despite fracture risk - inappropriate
✗Curettage without bone graft - leaves structural defect
✗Missing need for prophylactic fixation in this high-risk scenario
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What fixation options would you consider for prophylactic stabilization?"
"How would you counsel about recurrence risk after curettage?"
"What would you do differently if the lesion was in the femoral neck?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Differential Diagnosis Challenge

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old presents with a radiolucent lesion in the calcaneus. Your colleague suggests this is a simple bone cyst. The X-ray shows some central density. How do you differentiate between intraosseous lipoma and simple bone cyst? What additional imaging would you order?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is an important differential as both can present as radiolucent calcaneal lesions. The key distinguishing features are: First, the central density pattern - if this is a dense calcification, it suggests intraosseous lipoma (pathognomonic). Simple bone cyst would not have central calcification unless there has been pathological fracture with fallen fragment. Second, I would order MRI to definitively distinguish these. Intraosseous lipoma shows high T1 signal that suppresses with fat saturation - this proves fat content. Simple bone cyst shows fluid signal - low T1, high T2, does NOT suppress with fat saturation. Third, age is a clue - simple bone cysts are more common in children and adolescents (age 10-20), while intraosseous lipomas occur in middle-aged adults (40-60). Fourth, I would look for fallen fragment sign on X-ray - a bone fragment that has fallen to dependent portion of cyst after fracture. This is classic for simple bone cyst but not seen in lipoma. Based on this patient's age (45) and central density on X-ray, I would strongly suspect intraosseous lipoma, but MRI would confirm by demonstrating fat signal. No biopsy needed if imaging is classic.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Central calcification is pathognomonic for intraosseous lipoma
MRI distinguishes: lipoma has fat signal, SBC has fluid signal
Age is a clue: SBC in children, lipoma in adults
Fallen fragment sign specific for SBC, not lipoma
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not ordering MRI to definitively distinguish - this is essential
✗Recommending biopsy before MRI - unnecessary if MRI diagnostic
✗Confusing with bone infarct - infarct has peripheral calcification
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What other conditions present as radiolucent calcaneal lesions?"
"How do you distinguish intraosseous lipoma from bone infarct?"
"What is the Milgram classification and what does Stage 3 look like?"

MCQ Practice Points

Most Common Site

Q: What is the most common site for intraosseous lipoma? A: Calcaneus accounts for 60% of all intraosseous lipomas, followed by proximal femur (20%). This is a high-yield fact.

Pathognomonic Imaging

Q: What is the pathognomonic radiographic finding of intraosseous lipoma? A: Central calcification within a radiolucent lesion. This dense central nidus of calcification distinguishes intraosseous lipoma from simple bone cyst and other lucent lesions.

MRI Diagnosis

Q: What MRI finding confirms the diagnosis of intraosseous lipoma? A: High T1 signal that suppresses with fat saturation sequences. This proves fat content and allows confident diagnosis without biopsy.

Milgram Classification

Q: What does the Milgram classification of intraosseous lipoma indicate? A: The Milgram classification (Stages 1-3) reflects the histological evolution from viable fat to necrosis and calcification. It does NOT indicate biological behavior or prognosis - all stages are equally benign.

Treatment Indications

Q: What are the indications for surgical treatment of intraosseous lipoma? A: Surgery indicated for: persistent pain unresponsive to conservative treatment, pathological fracture or imminent fracture risk (large lesion with cortical thinning), or diagnostic uncertainty. Asymptomatic lesions can be observed.

Malignant Potential

Q: What is the malignant potential of intraosseous lipoma? A: Zero. Intraosseous lipoma is completely benign with no reported cases of malignant transformation. Prognosis is excellent.

Australian Context

Referral Pathway

  • Most cases managed in general orthopaedic practice
  • Musculoskeletal radiologists can confirm diagnosis on MRI
  • Oncology referral NOT required (benign lesion)

Imaging Access

  • MRI widely available for confirming fat signal
  • Medicare rebates available for MRI of bone lesions
  • CT rarely needed unless planning complex reconstruction

Fellowship Examination Relevance

For Orthopaedic fellowship examination, be prepared to describe the pathognomonic imaging features (central calcification on X-ray, fat signal on MRI), the Milgram classification (Stages 1-3 based on fat necrosis and calcification), and explain why this lesion is completely benign with no malignant potential.

INTRAOSSEOUS LIPOMA

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Facts

  • •Rare benign tumor - under 0.1% of all bone tumors
  • •Calcaneus most common site (60%), proximal femur (20%)
  • •Age 40-60 years, equal gender distribution
  • •Completely benign - no malignant potential

Pathognomonic Imaging

  • •Central calcification on X-ray - dense nidus within radiolucent lesion
  • •Fat signal on MRI - high T1, suppresses with fat saturation
  • •Distinguish from bone infarct - infarct has peripheral serpentine calcification
  • •MRI diagnostic - biopsy rarely needed if imaging classic

Milgram Classification

  • •Stage 1: Viable fat only - no calcification visible
  • •Stage 2: Fat necrosis with central calcification - most common (60-70%)
  • •Stage 3: Extensive calcification with cyst formation
  • •Staging reflects involution, NOT biological behavior - all benign

Clinical Presentation

  • •Asymptomatic (50-70%) - incidental finding
  • •Pain (30-50%) - dull, aching, activity-related
  • •Pathological fracture rare (under 5%) with large lesions
  • •No systemic symptoms

Management

  • •Asymptomatic: Observation with 6-month X-ray to confirm stability
  • •Symptomatic or fracture risk: Curettage with bone graft
  • •Prophylactic fixation if large lesion with cortical thinning
  • •Recurrence rare (under 5%) with complete curettage

Exam Pearls

  • •Central calcification = pathognomonic (vs peripheral in bone infarct)
  • •Fat on MRI confirms diagnosis - high T1, suppresses with fat-sat
  • •Calcaneus is #1 site - always think lipoma for lucent calcaneal lesion with central calcification
  • •Simple curettage curative - no wide margins needed (benign)
Quick Stats
Reading Time107 min
Related Topics

Chondroblastoma

Enchondroma

Fibrous Dysplasia

Bone Island (Enostosis)