Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Spinal Biomechanics

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Spinal Biomechanics

Fundamental biomechanical principles of the spine including motion segments, load distribution, and clinical implications for surgical practice

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

SPINAL BIOMECHANICS

Motion Segments | Load Distribution | Three-Column Theory

3columns (Denis)
6degrees of freedom per segment
70%load through anterior column
80%disc water content (young)

Spinal Motion Patterns

Cervical
PatternHigh mobility, flexion-extension dominant
TreatmentC5-C6 most mobile
Thoracic
PatternReduced mobility, rotation limited by ribs
TreatmentKyphotic posture
Lumbar
PatternFlexion-extension, limited rotation
TreatmentL4-L5 most mobile

Critical Must-Knows

  • Functional spinal unit = two adjacent vertebrae plus intervening disc and ligaments
  • Denis three-column theory: Anterior (ALL + anterior 50% body), Middle (posterior 50% body + PLL), Posterior (pedicles to spinous processes)
  • Instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) varies with spinal level and loading
  • Nucleus pulposus behaves as incompressible fluid under axial load
  • Facet joints resist shear and guide motion in sagittal or coronal plane

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    White and Panjabi criteria for clinical instability
  • "
    Intradiscal pressure highest in sitting flexion position
  • "
    Cervical lordosis averages 40 degrees, lumbar lordosis 60 degrees
  • "
    Coup and contrecoup injury patterns in spinal trauma

Critical Spinal Biomechanics Exam Points

Functional Spinal Unit

Two adjacent vertebrae plus intervening structures. Includes disc, facet joints, ligaments. Smallest functional unit of spine motion.

Denis Three-Column Theory

Instability if 2 or more columns disrupted. Anterior = ALL + anterior 50% body. Middle = PLL + posterior 50% body. Posterior = neural arch.

Instantaneous Axis of Rotation

IAR location determines motion pattern. Normal IAR in disc space. Abnormal IAR indicates instability or degeneration.

Load Distribution

70% load through anterior column. Disc bears majority of axial load. Facets bear 10-30% depending on posture.

Finite element model of cervical spine showing motion directions and intervertebral disc components
Click to expand
Cervical spine (C0-C7) finite element model for biomechanical analysis. Top row: Four views demonstrating the six degrees of freedom - flexion/extension (lateral view), right/left lateral bending (posterior view), and axial rotation (superior view). A follower load (blue arrow) simulates muscle forces along the curved spinal axis. Bottom row: Decomposition of intervertebral disc showing anatomical components - disc with end plates, nucleus pulposus (orange core), annulus fibrosus with concentric fiber layers (red/blue rings), and cartilaginous end plates. This functional spinal unit representation is fundamental to understanding spinal load distribution.Credit: Wang H et al., Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022 - CC BY
Cervical range of motion comparison between intact spine and post-ACDF fusion
Click to expand
Cervical spine range of motion (ROM) analysis comparing intact (blue) vs post-ACDF fusion at C5/6 (orange). Panels A-C: Total ROM for C0-C7 segments showing 4-7% decrease in all motions post-fusion. Panels D-I: Segmental ROM per level for flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation. Note the -100% change at C5/6 (fusion site) and compensatory increase at adjacent segments (C4/5 and C6/7), demonstrating the biomechanical basis of adjacent segment disease. Red line indicates percentage change from intact values.Credit: Wang H et al., Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022 - CC BY

At a Glance

Spinal biomechanics centers on the functional spinal unit—two adjacent vertebrae plus intervening disc, facet joints, and ligaments—representing the smallest functional motion unit with 6 degrees of freedom. The Denis three-column theory defines spinal stability: Anterior column (ALL + anterior 50% of vertebral body), Middle column (PLL + posterior 50% of body), Posterior column (neural arch structures)—disruption of 2 or more columns indicates instability. The anterior column bears approximately 70% of axial load, with the nucleus pulposus behaving as an incompressible fluid distributing forces, while facet joints bear 10-30% depending on posture and guide motion patterns (sagittal in lumbar, coronal in thoracic). The instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) normally lies within the disc space; abnormal IAR migration indicates degeneration or instability. White and Panjabi criteria quantify clinical instability: greater than 3.5mm translation or greater than 11° angulation in the cervical spine, greater than 4.5mm or greater than 20° in the thoracolumbar spine.

Mnemonic

AMPDenis Three-Column Spine Stability

A
Anterior
ALL + anterior 50% of vertebral body and disc
M
Middle
PLL + posterior 50% of vertebral body and disc
P
Posterior
Pedicles, facets, laminae, spinous processes, interspinous ligaments

Memory Hook:AMP up stability: 2 or more columns disrupted = unstable spine!

Mnemonic

TRANSLATIONWhite and Panjabi Clinical Instability Criteria

T
Translation
Greater than 3.5mm horizontal displacement (cervical) or 4.5mm (thoracolumbar)
R
Rotation
Greater than 11 degrees angulation (cervical) or 20 degrees (thoracolumbar)
A
Anterior/Posterior column
Disruption of two or more columns
N
Neurological deficit
Progressive or significant neural compromise

Memory Hook:TRANSLATION measurements define clinical instability in spinal imaging!

Mnemonic

SAFERSpinal Load Distribution by Position

S
Supine
Lowest pressure - 25% of standing (best for disc health)
A
Axial loading
70% through anterior column, 10-30% through facets
F
Flexion sitting
Highest pressure - 275% of standing (worst position)
E
Extension standing
Reduced pressure - 75% of standing
R
Rotation limited
Lumbar spine resists rotation due to sagittal facets

Memory Hook:SAFER positions = lower intradiscal pressure (supine best, flexion worst)!

Overview and Introduction

What is Spinal Biomechanics?

Spinal biomechanics is the study of mechanical principles governing spinal motion, load distribution, and stability. Understanding these principles is essential for interpreting spinal pathology, assessing instability, and planning surgical interventions. The spine functions as a flexible column that must balance competing demands: mobility for daily activities and stability to protect neural elements.

The Functional Spinal Unit

The functional spinal unit (FSU), also called a motion segment, is the smallest physiological unit of the spine capable of exhibiting biomechanical characteristics similar to the entire spine. It consists of two adjacent vertebrae, the intervening intervertebral disc, all adjoining ligaments, and the paired facet joints.

Components

  • Anterior elements: Vertebral bodies, intervertebral disc, anterior/posterior longitudinal ligaments
  • Posterior elements: Pedicles, facet joints, laminae, spinous process, ligamentum flavum, interspinous/supraspinous ligaments
  • Neurovascular: Nerve roots, spinal cord (if present), blood supply

Biomechanical Role

  • Load bearing: Anterior column (70%), posterior column (10-30%)
  • Motion control: Six degrees of freedom (3 translations, 3 rotations)
  • Stability: Resists excessive displacement under physiological loads
  • Protection: Neural elements housed within spinal canal

Degrees of Freedom

Each spinal motion segment has six degrees of freedom: three translations (anterior-posterior, lateral, vertical) and three rotations (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation). The range of motion varies by spinal region.

Understanding degrees of freedom is critical for analyzing instability.

Concepts in Spinal Biomechanics

Load Transmission Through the Spine

The spine transmits load through two parallel systems: the anterior column (vertebral bodies and discs) and the posterior column (facet joints and neural arch). In neutral standing, approximately 70% of axial load passes through the anterior column, while the posterior elements bear 10-30%. This distribution changes with posture, increasing posterior load in extension and anterior load in flexion.

Three-Column Stability Model

Denis proposed a conceptual framework dividing the spine into three structural columns to assess stability. This model recognizes that the middle column is the critical determinant of spinal stability.

Motion Control and the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation

During spinal motion, each vertebra rotates about a point called the instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR). In a healthy spine, the IAR is located within the disc space or adjacent vertebral body. Abnormal IAR location outside these boundaries indicates instability or degeneration. Understanding IAR is crucial for evaluating pathological motion patterns.

Denis Three-Column Theory

Denis proposed a three-column model in 1983 to classify thoracolumbar fractures and predict stability. Disruption of two or more columns indicates spinal instability.

Three-Column Anatomy and Function

ColumnAnatomical StructuresPrimary FunctionFailure Mode
AnteriorALL, anterior 50% vertebral body, anterior annulusResists extension and axial loadCompression fracture
MiddlePLL, posterior 50% vertebral body, posterior annulusResists flexion, critical for stabilityBurst fracture with canal compromise
PosteriorPedicles, facets, laminae, spinous processes, ligamentsResists flexion and rotation, tension bandDistraction injury (Chance fracture)

Middle Column Is Key

Middle column integrity determines spinal stability. Isolated anterior or posterior column injury is often stable. Middle column failure with one other column = unstable. This guides surgical decision-making for thoracolumbar fractures.

Load Distribution and Disc Mechanics

Axial Load Sharing

The anterior column (vertebral body and disc) bears approximately 70% of axial load in neutral standing. The posterior elements (facet joints) bear 10-30%, increasing with extension.

Disc Biomechanics

  • Nucleus pulposus: 80% water (young), behaves as incompressible fluid
  • Annulus fibrosus: Concentric lamellae of type I collagen
  • Hydrostatic pressure: Distributes load, increases with axial compression
  • Degeneration: Water loss reduces shock absorption

Facet Joint Function

  • Orientation: Sagittal (cervical/lumbar) allows flexion-extension
  • Orientation: Coronal (thoracic) allows lateral bending
  • Load bearing: Increases with extension and disc degeneration
  • Shear resistance: Prevents anterior translation

Intradiscal Pressure

Nachemson demonstrated that intradiscal pressure is highest in sitting flexion (275% of standing), intermediate in standing (100%), and lowest in supine (25%). This has implications for patient positioning and rehabilitation.

Instantaneous Axis of Rotation

The instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) is the point about which a vertebra rotates during motion. In a healthy spine, the IAR is located within the disc space or adjacent vertebral body. Abnormal IAR location indicates instability or degeneration.

Clinical Significance

  • Normal IAR: Within disc space, consistent motion pattern
  • Abnormal IAR: Outside disc space, indicative of instability
  • Degenerative changes: IAR shifts posteriorly with disc height loss
  • Fusion effect: Eliminates motion at that segment, IAR moves to adjacent levels

IAR in Cervical Spine

Q: Where is the normal IAR in the cervical spine? A: In the posteroinferior quadrant of the lower vertebral body. Abnormal IAR location outside the vertebral body suggests instability or pathology.

Regional Spinal Biomechanics

Cervical Spine Biomechanics

The cervical spine exhibits the highest mobility of all spinal regions. C5-C6 is the most mobile segment.

FeatureCharacteristicClinical Implication
Lordosis40 degrees averageMaintains horizontal gaze
Facet orientation45 degrees to horizontalAllows flexion-extension and rotation
IAR locationPosteroinferior bodyAbnormal IAR = instability
C1-C2 motion50% cervical rotationAt risk in RA, Down syndrome

Atlanto-axial joint allows approximately 50% of total cervical rotation. The odontoid peg is the pivot point.

Thoracic Spine Biomechanics

The thoracic spine has limited motion due to rib cage articulation and coronal facet orientation.

FeatureCharacteristicClinical Implication
Kyphosis20-40 degreesProtective alignment for cord
Facet orientationCoronal (60 degrees)Limits flexion-extension, allows rotation
Rib cageProvides lateral stabilityThoracic fractures less unstable than lumbar
Spinal canalNarrow canal to cord ratioLess tolerance for canal compromise

Thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2) is a transition zone with higher injury risk due to change from rigid thoracic to mobile lumbar spine.

Lumbar Spine Biomechanics

The lumbar spine bears the highest axial loads and exhibits significant flexion-extension motion.

FeatureCharacteristicClinical Implication
Lordosis60 degrees averageBalances thoracic kyphosis
Facet orientationSagittal (parallel to midline)Allows flexion-extension, limits rotation
L4-L5 motionGreatest flexion-extensionHighest degeneration rate
L5-S1 shearHigh anterior shear stressProne to spondylolisthesis

Pars interarticularis at L5 is at high risk of stress fracture due to repetitive extension loading in young athletes.

Clinical Applications and Relevance

Application to Spinal Trauma

Understanding spinal biomechanics is essential for interpreting fracture patterns and assessing stability. The Denis three-column theory guides surgical decision-making: isolated anterior column fractures (simple compression) are often stable, while burst fractures involving anterior and middle columns require careful evaluation. Two-column disruption is the threshold for surgical stabilization in most cases.

Application to Degenerative Disease

Biomechanical principles explain the natural history of spinal degeneration. Disc degeneration leads to loss of disc height, which shifts the IAR posteriorly and increases facet loading. This creates a degenerative cascade: increased facet stress accelerates facet arthropathy, which further alters load distribution. Understanding this cascade informs treatment decisions, including motion preservation versus fusion.

Trauma Applications

  • Fracture classification: Apply Denis three-column theory
  • Instability assessment: Use White-Panjabi criteria
  • Surgical planning: Two-column disruption guides fixation
  • Neurological risk: Middle column compromise threatens canal

Degenerative Applications

  • Disc pathology: Intradiscal pressure guides activity modification
  • Spondylolisthesis: Understand shear forces at L5-S1
  • Stenosis: Facet hypertrophy from altered load distribution
  • Adjacent segment disease: IAR changes after fusion

Surgical Decision-Making

Biomechanical understanding informs surgical approach selection. For example, posterior fixation addresses the tension band but may not adequately restore anterior column height in burst fractures. Combined anterior-posterior approaches restore both columns. In cervical spine, understanding that C1-C2 provides 50% of rotation helps explain why C1-C2 fusion significantly limits neck rotation.

Patient Education and Rehabilitation

Nachemson's intradiscal pressure measurements provide evidence-based guidance for activity modification. Patients with disc pathology benefit from understanding that sitting flexion creates the highest disc pressure (275% of standing), while supine positioning is lowest (25%). This informs posture recommendations and lifting technique education.

Evidence Base and Key Studies

White and Panjabi Clinical Instability Criteria

4
White AA, Panjabi MM • Spine (1990)
Key Findings:
  • Defined clinical instability as loss of spinal ability to maintain patterns of displacement under physiological loads
  • Cervical instability: greater than 3.5mm translation or greater than 11 degrees angulation
  • Thoracolumbar instability: greater than 4.5mm translation or greater than 20 degrees angulation
  • Two-column disruption correlates with clinical instability
Clinical Implication: White-Panjabi criteria remain gold standard for defining radiographic instability in trauma and degenerative conditions.
Limitation: Based on cadaveric studies; in vivo validation limited.

Denis Three-Column Theory

4
Denis F • Spine (1983)
Key Findings:
  • Proposed three-column model: anterior (ALL + anterior 50% body), middle (PLL + posterior 50% body), posterior (neural arch)
  • Instability defined as disruption of two or more columns
  • Middle column integrity is key determinant of stability
  • Classification guides surgical decision-making in thoracolumbar fractures
Clinical Implication: Three-column theory underpins thoracolumbar fracture classification and surgical indications.
Limitation: Does not account for ligamentous injury patterns or dynamic instability.

Intradiscal Pressure Measurements

3
Nachemson A, Elfström G • Acta Orthop Scand Suppl (1970)
Key Findings:
  • In vivo intradiscal pressure highest in sitting flexion (275% of standing)
  • Standing neutral = 100%, standing extension = 75%, supine = 25%
  • Lifting with flexed spine increases pressure significantly
  • Coughing and Valsalva increase intradiscal pressure
Clinical Implication: Informs patient education on posture, lifting technique, and activity modification for disc pathology.
Limitation: Measured in healthy discs; degenerative discs may behave differently.

Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Fusion

3
Hilibrand AS, Robbins M • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2004)
Key Findings:
  • 25% symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration at 10 years after cervical fusion
  • 2.9% per year incidence of adjacent segment pathology
  • Biomechanical alteration of IAR at adjacent levels contributes to degeneration
  • No difference between anterior vs posterior approach
Clinical Implication: Inform patients of long-term risk of adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion. Consider motion preservation in select cases.
Limitation: Unclear if natural history or fusion-related; no randomized controlled trials.

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score

4
Vaccaro AR, et al • Spine (2013)
Key Findings:
  • TLICS score incorporates Denis three-column theory with neurological status and posterior ligamentous complex
  • Score 1-3 = non-operative, 4 = surgeon discretion, 5+ = operative
  • Validates importance of middle column and PLC in stability
  • High interobserver reliability for surgical decision-making
Clinical Implication: Modern classification system builds on Denis three-column biomechanical principles. TLICS guides operative vs non-operative treatment.
Limitation: Does not account for patient-specific factors like bone quality or comorbidities.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Three-Column Theory (~2 min)

EXAMINER

"The examiner shows a thoracolumbar burst fracture on CT. Describe the Denis three-column theory and how it guides your assessment of stability."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The Denis three-column theory divides the spine into anterior, middle, and posterior columns. The anterior column comprises the ALL and anterior 50% of the vertebral body and disc. The middle column includes the PLL and posterior 50% of the vertebral body and disc. The posterior column consists of the pedicles, facet joints, laminae, and all posterior ligamentous structures. Denis proposed that disruption of two or more columns indicates spinal instability. In this burst fracture, I can see involvement of the anterior and middle columns with retropulsion of the posterior vertebral body wall. I would assess for middle column integrity on CT and evaluate for posterior ligamentous injury on MRI. If two or more columns are disrupted, surgical stabilization is typically indicated.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Accurately define all three columns with anatomical boundaries
Explain that 2 or more column disruption = instability
Apply theory to the specific fracture pattern shown
Link biomechanical instability to surgical decision-making
COMMON TRAPS
âś—Confusing anterior vs middle column boundary (50% vertebral body is dividing line)
âś—Forgetting to mention middle column as key determinant
âś—Not applying theory to clinical decision about surgery
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if only the anterior column is fractured?"
"How does MRI change your assessment?"
"What defines instability in the cervical spine?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Load Distribution and IAR (~3 min)

EXAMINER

"Explain the concept of instantaneous axis of rotation and how it changes in degenerative disc disease. What are the implications for adjacent segment degeneration after fusion?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The instantaneous axis of rotation is the point about which a vertebra rotates during motion. In a healthy spine, the IAR is located within the disc space or adjacent vertebral body. Normal IAR location ensures physiological motion patterns. In degenerative disc disease, disc height loss and facet arthropathy shift the IAR posteriorly, often outside the disc space. This abnormal IAR indicates altered mechanics and potential instability. When we perform a spinal fusion, we eliminate motion at that segment. The IAR at adjacent levels must compensate, leading to increased motion and stress. Studies show 2-3% per year incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after fusion. Motion preservation technologies like disc arthroplasty aim to maintain normal IAR and reduce adjacent segment stress.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Define IAR as rotational center during motion
Normal IAR location is within disc space
Degenerative changes shift IAR posteriorly
Fusion eliminates IAR, transfers stress to adjacent levels
COMMON TRAPS
âś—Confusing IAR with center of mass
âś—Not linking IAR changes to clinical instability
âś—Missing the adjacent segment degeneration connection
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you measure IAR on dynamic radiographs?"
"What is the rate of adjacent segment degeneration?"
"How does disc arthroplasty affect IAR?"

MCQ Practice Points

Denis Middle Column Question

Q: Which structure is considered part of the middle column in the Denis three-column theory? A: Posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) and posterior 50% of the vertebral body and disc. The middle column is critical for stability determination.

Intradiscal Pressure Question

Q: In which position is intradiscal pressure highest according to Nachemson? A: Sitting with forward flexion (275% of standing). This informs patient education on posture and lifting technique.

Cervical Instability Criteria Question

Q: What is the White-Panjabi threshold for cervical instability in terms of translation? A: Greater than 3.5mm horizontal displacement. This criterion guides surgical decision-making in trauma and degenerative disease.

Functional Spinal Unit Question

Q: What defines a functional spinal unit? A: Two adjacent vertebrae plus the intervening disc, facet joints, and all associated ligaments. It is the smallest biomechanical unit of the spine.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology and Practice

Spinal Biomechanics in Australian Practice:

  • Spinal biomechanics forms a core component of FRACS Basic Science examination
  • Understanding Denis three-column theory, White-Panjabi criteria, and IAR concepts is essential for Australian orthopaedic training
  • Major spinal centres (Austin Hospital, Royal North Shore, Princess Alexandra Hospital) manage complex spinal trauma and degenerative conditions

RACS Orthopaedic Training Relevance:

  • Spinal biomechanics is heavily tested in both written and viva examinations
  • Candidates must understand load distribution, instability criteria, and regional biomechanical differences
  • Denis three-column theory and TLICS scoring are commonly examined topics
  • Viva scenarios frequently test application of biomechanical principles to clinical decision-making

Australian Spinal Trauma Management:

  • Major trauma centres follow standardised spinal clearance protocols incorporating biomechanical principles
  • Victorian State Trauma System and NSW Trauma Networks coordinate complex spinal injury management
  • Pre-hospital spinal immobilisation protocols based on mechanism and biomechanical injury patterns
  • Aeromedical retrieval services (CareFlight, RACQ LifeFlight) follow evidence-based spinal handling protocols

PBS (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Considerations:

  • Bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion have variable PBS coverage
  • rhBMP-2 available through Special Access Scheme for specific spinal fusion indications
  • Analgesic medications for spinal conditions follow PBS prescribing guidelines

eTG (Therapeutic Guidelines) Recommendations:

  • Pain management guidelines for acute and chronic spinal conditions
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations for spinal surgery
  • VTE prophylaxis protocols for spinal surgery patients

Australian Research Contributions:

  • Australian spinal surgeons contribute to international biomechanics research
  • Collaboration with AO Spine for education and research initiatives
  • Cadaveric and biomechanical testing facilities at major Australian universities

SPINAL BIOMECHANICS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Concepts

  • •Functional spinal unit = 2 vertebrae + disc + ligaments + facets
  • •6 degrees of freedom: 3 translations + 3 rotations
  • •IAR = instantaneous axis of rotation (normally in disc space)
  • •Load distribution: 70% anterior column, 10-30% facets

Denis Three-Column Theory

  • •Anterior = ALL + anterior 50% body + disc
  • •Middle = PLL + posterior 50% body + disc (KEY for stability)
  • •Posterior = pedicles, facets, laminae, spinous processes
  • •2 or more columns disrupted = unstable

Clinical Instability Criteria

  • •Cervical: greater than 3.5mm translation or greater than 11 degrees angulation
  • •Thoracolumbar: greater than 4.5mm translation or greater than 20 degrees
  • •White-Panjabi criteria = gold standard
  • •Two-column disruption on Denis = surgical consideration

Regional Biomechanics

  • •Cervical: Highest mobility, C5-C6 most mobile, IAR posteroinferior body
  • •Thoracic: Limited motion, coronal facets, rib cage stability
  • •Lumbar: Highest load, sagittal facets, L4-L5 most mobile
  • •C1-C2: 50% cervical rotation at atlanto-axial joint

Disc Mechanics

  • •Nucleus pulposus: 80% water (young), incompressible fluid
  • •Intradiscal pressure: 275% sitting flexion, 100% standing, 25% supine
  • •Annulus fibrosus: Concentric lamellae, type I collagen
  • •Degeneration: Water loss, IAR shift, reduced shock absorption
Quick Stats
Reading Time65 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • NHMRC Guidelines
  • MBS Spine Items
Related Topics

Articular Cartilage Structure and Function

Bending Moment Distribution in Fracture Fixation

Biceps Femoris Short Head Anatomy

Biofilm Formation in Orthopaedic Infections