Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis

A comprehensive guide to Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis (Age 4-10), emphasizing the high risk of progression, neural axis abnormalities, and management challenges.

complete
Updated: 2026-01-02
High Yield Overview

Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis

Age 4-10 Years

4 to 10 yearsAge
Greater than 70%Progression rate
20%Neural Axis Abnormalities
RareResolution

C-EOS Risk Stratification

Low Risk
PatternCobb less than 30 deg. Risser 0.
TreatmentBrace/Observe
High Risk
PatternCobb greater than 30 deg. Progression greater than 10 deg/year.
TreatmentSurgery (Growing Rods)

Critical Must-Knows

  • Malignant Progression: Very high risk of becoming severe before skeletal maturity.
  • MRI Mandatory: 20% have intraspinal pathology (Arnold-Chiari, Syrinx, Tethered Cord).
  • Lung Development: Alveolar multiplication continues until age 8 (avoid early fusion!).
  • Casting Limit: Rarely effective after age 4 due to stiffness.
  • Treatment Gap: Often requires 'Growth Friendly' surgery (growing rods).

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Full neurological exam is critical (Abdominal reflexes)
  • "
    Look for cafe-au-lait spots (NF1)
  • "
    Assess flexibility (Bending films)
  • "
    Check lung function (if cooperative)

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Five-panel image with PA/lateral radiographs and 3D CT reconstructions showing spinal deformity with vertebral rotation highlighted
Click to expand
Five-panel image with PA/lateral radiographs and 3D CT reconstructions showing spinal deformity with vertebral rotation highlightedCredit: Schlösser TP et al. via PLoS ONE via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Multi-panel EOS biplanar imaging showing full-body standing radiographs and 3D reconstructions of severe pediatric idiopathic scoliosis in 14-year-old
Click to expand
Multi-panel EOS biplanar imaging showing full-body standing radiographs and 3D reconstructions of severe pediatric idiopathic scoliosis in 14-year-oldCredit: Amzallag-Bellenger E et al. via Insights Imaging via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Eight-panel composite showing clinical photographs and radiographs of 18-year-old with severe rigid scoliosis (110° thoracolumbar curve)
Click to expand
Eight-panel composite showing clinical photographs and radiographs of 18-year-old with severe rigid scoliosis (110° thoracolumbar curve)Credit: Teixeira da Silva LE et al. via Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Full spine standing radiograph demonstrating scoliosis with vertebral body and intervertebral disc wedging
Click to expand
Full spine standing radiograph demonstrating scoliosis with vertebral body and intervertebral disc wedgingCredit: Modi HN et al. via Scoliosis via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

The MRI Rule

Juvenile Scoliosis = MRI Spine.

  • In Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), MRI is reserved for "Red Flags".
  • In Juvenile Scoliosis, the condition ITSELF is a red flag.
  • Approximately 20% of patients with "Idiopathic" Juvenile Scoliosis have a neural axis abnormality (Chiari 1 malformation, Syringomyelia). These require neurosurgical decompression before scoliosis correction.

Juvenile vs Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

FeatureJuvenile (4-10)Adolescent (10+)
High (20%)Low (2-4%)
Very High ('Malignant')Variable (Depends on Risser)
Female > MaleFemale >>> Male
Moderate (Age 4-8 critical)Low (Lungs developed)
Mnemonic

Red Flags in Juvenile Scoliosis

L
Left
Left thoracic curve (Check MRI)
P
Pain
Significant night pain (Tumor/Infection)
N
Neuro
Abnormal reflexes (Syrinx)
R
Rapid
Rapid progression (greater than 10 deg/6mo)

Memory Hook:LPN-R (Licensed Practical Nurse - Rapid response).

Mnemonic

Goals of Treatment

P
Prevent
Prevent severe deformity (greater than 90 deg)
P
Preserve
Preserve lung growth (TIS prevention)
P
Postpone
Postpone definitive fusion until age 10-12

Memory Hook:Triple P.

Mnemonic

Surgical Options

G
Growing Rods
Distraction based (MCGR/TGR)
S
Shilla
Growth guidance
V
VEPTR
Chest expansion
T
Tethering
VBT (Anterior Growth Modulation)

Memory Hook:GSVT (Great Spines Very Tall).

Overview/Epidemiology

Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis (JIS) occupies the age range of 4 to 10 years.

  • The "Grey Zone": It exists between the resolving potential of Infantile scoliosis and the predictable patterns of Adolescent scoliosis.
  • Epidemiology:
    • Accounts for approx 10-15% of all idiopathic scoliosis.
    • Female Predominance: Similar to AIS, females are more commonly affected.
    • Right Thoracic: The curve pattern begins to resemble AIS (Right sided).
  • Malignancy: It is often termed "malignant" because the child has a huge remaining growth potential (the pre-pubertal growth spurt lies ahead). A 30 degree curve at age 5 will almost certainly be greater than 100 degrees by maturity if untreated.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Lung Development

  • Alveolar Phase: From birth to age 8, alveoli multiply in number.
  • Hypertrophy Phase: After age 8, alveoli increase in size but not number.
  • Implication: Early fusion (or severe deformity) before age 8 results in a permanent reduction in alveolar number (True pulmonary hypoplasia). Fusion after age 10 typically has minimal impact on pulmonary function.

Neuroaxis Abnormalities

  • Chiari 1 Malformation: Herniation of cerebellar tonsils greater than 5mm.
  • Syringomyelia: Fluid filled cyst in the spinal cord.
  • Mechanism: The syrinx expands the cord preferentially on one side, damaging the anterior horn cells that innervate the paraspinal muscles. This creates a muscle imbalance that drives the scoliosis.

Classification Systems

Lenke Classification?

  • While the Lenke classification is designed for AIS, it is often applied to older juvenile patients (age 8-10) to describe the curve pattern.
  • Utility is limited because "Triple Major" patterns are less common than long neurological C-curves or simple Thoracic curves.

C-EOS Classification

More useful for Juvenile patients.

  • Etiology: I (Idiopathic).
  • Cobb: Angle magnitude.
  • Kyphosis: Greater than 50 = Bad.
  • Progression: P2 (Malignant greater than 20 deg/yr).

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Pain: Night pain, back pain. (Red flag for tumor/syrinx).
  • Neurology: Headaches? Change in bowel/bladder? (Chiari/Tethered cord).
  • Family Hx: Strong scoliosis history.

Physical Exam:

  1. Cutaneous Markers: Hairy patches, dimples, hemangiomas.
  2. Neurology:
    • Abdominal Reflexes: Stroking the abdomen should cause umbilicus to deviate towards the stimulus. Asymmetry = Syrinx until proven otherwise.
    • Lower Limb: Cavovarus feet (Charcot-Marie-Tooth or Dysraphism).
  3. Adams Forward Bend Test: Quantify the rib hump (Scoliometer).

Investigations

Primary Imaging:

  • PA and Lateral Whole Spine X-ray.
  • Supine/Bending Films: To assess flexibility. This determines if bracing is viable (flexible) or if release is needed (stiff).

Neuroimaging:

  • MRI Whole Spine: Mandatory for all Juvenile Scoliosis greater than 20 degrees.
  • Must image Brainstem to Sacrum.
EOS biplanar imaging demonstrating severe pediatric idiopathic scoliosis
Click to expand
Multi-panel EOS biplanar imaging of severe idiopathic scoliosis in a 14-year-old girl. Panels a, b, c show full-body standing radiographs (frontal and lateral views) demonstrating major right thoracic and left lumbar curves. Panels d, e show 3D reconstructions from EOS data. The EOS imaging system provides simultaneous frontal and lateral full-body radiographs with significantly reduced radiation exposure compared to conventional radiography - critical for pediatric patients requiring serial imaging to monitor curve progression.Credit: Amzallag-Bellenger E et al. via Insights Imaging via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Three-dimensional reconstruction demonstrating vertebral rotation in scoliosis
Click to expand
Five-panel image demonstrating 3D understanding of scoliosis deformity. Left panel shows conventional PA spine radiograph. Right four panels show 3D CT bone reconstructions from different viewing angles with yellow highlighting on rotated vertebrae. This illustrates the key concept that scoliosis is a THREE-DIMENSIONAL deformity involving lateral curvature (Cobb angle), vertebral rotation, and sagittal plane changes. The 3D models help surgeons plan correction strategies including derotation maneuvers.Credit: Schlösser TP et al. via PLoS ONE via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Full spine radiograph showing vertebral wedging in scoliosis
Click to expand
Weight-bearing full spine AP radiograph demonstrating scoliosis with vertebral body and intervertebral disc wedging. Note the asymmetric vertebral growth patterns contributing to curve progression - this is particularly relevant in juvenile scoliosis where substantial remaining growth potentiates rapid progression. The wedging occurs due to differential loading on the concave versus convex sides of the curve (Hueter-Volkmann law).Credit: Modi HN et al. via Scoliosis via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Clinical and radiographic presentation of severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis
Click to expand
Eight-panel clinical-radiographic correlation in an 18-year-old with severe rigid adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (110° main thoracolumbar curve). Panels a-d show clinical photographs from posterior and lateral views demonstrating severe trunk deformity and rib hump. Panels e-h show full spine radiographs with 45° curve marked on lateral view. This severity typically requires surgical intervention with growth-friendly techniques (growing rods/VBT) if diagnosed in juvenile years, or definitive fusion if skeletal maturity is approaching.Credit: Teixeira da Silva LE et al. via Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Management Algorithm

1. Bracing (TLSO)

  • Indication: Curves 25-45 degrees, Risser 0, Flexible.
  • Efficacy: Less effective than in AIS. "Part-time" bracing (night only) is useless. Requires 20-23 hours/day.
  • Goal: Delay surgery. Usually cannot prevent surgery eventually, but delays it until age 10-12 (lung maturity).

2. Casting

  • Indication: Rarely used after Age 5. Useful if failing brace to "buy time".

3. Growth Friendly Surgery

  • Indication: Curve greater than 50 degrees, Progression despite bracing.
  • Goal: Control curve + Allow growth.

4. Definitive Fusion

  • Indication: Age greater than 10-12, Risser 1+, Menarche.
  • Goal: One surgery, one recovery.
Clinical Algorithm
Loading flowchart...

Surgical Techniques

Growing Rods (MCGR)

  • Technique: Proximal anchors (T2/3 hooks/screws) and Distal anchors (L3/4 screws). Submuscular rods.
  • Magnet: External magnet lengthens the rod 3-5mm every 3 months in clinic.
  • Advantage: Avoids "Law of Diminishing Returns" (spontaneous autofusion from repeated open surgeries).
  • Disadvantage: Metal artifact on MRI (makes monitoring syrinx difficult). Cost.

Shilla Growth Guidance

  • Technique: Fusion at the apex only (e.g., T8-T10).
  • Sliding Screws: Proximal and distal screws are not locked to the rod. The rod slides through them as the child grows ("Like a trombone").
  • Advantage: "One and done" surgery (theoretically).
  • Disadvantage: Implant prominence, screw pull-out, breakage.

Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT)

  • Technique: Thoracoscopic placement of screws into vertebral bodies on the convex side. Connected by a flexible cord.
  • Principle: Hueter-Volkmann law. Compression slows growth on convexity, allowing concavity to catch up.
  • Role: Controversial but gaining popularity for flexible curves in age 8-12.

Deep Dive: The Crankshaft Phenomenon

Definition: Progressive rotational and angular deformity that occurs after posterior fusion in skeletal immature patients.

Mechanism:

  • Posterior elements are fused (tethered).
  • Anterior vertebral bodies (neurocentral synchondrosis) continue to grow.
  • Result: The spine bulges anteriorly and twists (rotates) around the posterior tether.

Prevention:

  • In Risser 0 patients with open triradiate cartilage (Age less than 10), posterior fusion ALONE is contraindicated.
  • Must perform Anterior and Posterior Fusion (circumferential) to stop all growth plates if definitive fusion is chosen.

The Law of Diminishing Returns With traditional distraction-based surgery (TGR):

  • Every time you operate to lengthen the rods, the spine scars and stiffens ("Auto-fusion").
  • The amount of length gained per surgery decreases over time.
  • By the 5th or 6th lengthening, the spine may be completely stiff, yielding zero length gain, but all the risks of surgery remain.
  • Solution: Minimise interventions (use MCGR) or delay initial implantation as long as possible.

Complications

ComplicationRatePrevention/Management
Implant FailureHighMCGR rods jam. Anchors pull out.
InfectionModerateIncreased with multiple surgeries (less with MCGR).
PJKCommonProximal Junctional Kyphosis. Avoid stopping at kyphotic apex.
metallosisUnknownTitanium debris from sliding rods (Shilla).
NeurologicalRareMonitor cord during lengthening.

Postoperative Care

  • Bracing: Most growing rod patients require a brace post-op to protect the proximal anchors.
  • Activity: Restricted contact sports.
  • Lengthening: Strict adherence to lengthening schedule (usually every 3 months for MCGR).

Outcomes/Prognosis

  • Untreated: Severe disability, restrictive lung disease, Cor Pulmonale.
  • Treated:
    • Most require definitive fusion at maturity.
    • Goal is a "straight-ish" spine with adequate lung strings.
    • Final height is usually short (short trunk), but functional.
  • Pain: Adults with treated JIS have higher rates of back pain than AIS patients.

Evidence Base

Classic
📚 Robinson and McMaster
Key Findings:
  • Natural history of Juvenile Scoliosis
  • High rates of progression in curves greater than 30 degrees
  • Progression continues even after skeletal maturity if severe
Clinical Implication: Aggressive treatment is warranted.
Source: JBJS Br 1996

Level IV
📚 Gupta and Lenke
Key Findings:
  • Neural axis abnormalities in Juvenile Scoliosis
  • Incidence 27%
  • Recommends MRI for all patients less than 10 years old
Clinical Implication: MRI is mandatory.
Source: Spine 2002

Level III
📚 Akbarnia et al
Key Findings:
  • Dual vs Single Growing Rods
  • Dual rods are stronger and provide better correction
  • Lower implant failure rate
Clinical Implication: Use dual rods.
Source: Spine 2008

Level III
📚 Cheung et al
Key Findings:
  • MCGR (Magnet) vs Conventional Growing Rods
  • Fewer planned surgeries
  • Similar complication profile (implant failure still common)
  • Better psychological scores
Clinical Implication: MCGR is preferred.
Source: Spine 2016

Level III
📚 Bess et al
Key Findings:
  • Complications of Growing Rod treatment
  • 58% complication rate per patient
  • Risk of complication increases with every surgery performed
Clinical Implication: Law of Diminishing Returns.
Source: JBJS Am 2010

Level III
📚 Karol et al
Key Findings:
  • Lung function after early fusion
  • Fusion of greater than 4 segments before age 8 leads to restrictive lung disease
  • Proximal thoracic fusion is worst
Clinical Implication: Delay fusion until age 10.
Source: JBJS Am 2008

Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Malignant Progression

EXAMINER

"6-year-old female. Right Thoracic curve 35 degrees. MRI is normal. Risser 0."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is a classic Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis. With a curve of 35 degrees at age 6, this is highly likely to progress (Malignant curve). Observation is not appropriate. **Bracing** (TLSO) is the first line treatment to delay progression, but parents must be warned of high failure rates. If it progresses despite bracing to greater than 50 degrees, **Growing Rods** (MCGR) would be the next step. Fusion should be avoided this young.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
High progression risk
Brace to buy time
Avoid early fusion
COMMON TRAPS
✗Observing a 35 deg curve
✗Fusing at age 6
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What specific bracing protocol would you prescribe?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

The Syrinx

EXAMINER

"8-year-old male. Left Thoracic curve. MRI shows a large thoracic syrinx."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

The syrinx is the likely cause of the scoliosis. I would refer to **Neurosurgery** for decompression (Foramen Magnum Decompression / Shunting). The scoliosis treatment should be paused (unless severe/threatening). In many cases (approx 30-50%), the scoliosis may improve or stabilize after the syrinx is decompressed. If it persists or progresses after neurosurgery, then treat the scoliosis (Brace/Surgery).

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Treat the cause first
Neurosurgery referral
Wait for resolution
COMMON TRAPS
✗Instrumenting the spine with a syrinx (Risk of paralysis)
✗Ignoring the Left curve red flag
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How long do you wait after neurosurgery to instrument?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Crankshaft in a 9-year-old

EXAMINER

"A 9-year-old underwent posterior fusion for severe scoliosis 2 years ago. Now the deformity is recurring and she is twisting."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

This is the **Crankshaft Phenomenon**. The posterior tether has stopped posterior growth, but anterior growth has continued, causing rotation. Radiographs will show the "Sunset sign" or "Double rib contour". Management requires **Anterior Fusion** (discectomies and fusion) to stop the anterior growth engine, and potentially osteotomies to correct the deformity if severe.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Continued anterior growth
Anterior fusion required
Prevention is key
COMMON TRAPS
✗Thinking it's just pseudarthrosis
✗Revising posteriorly only
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"At what Risser stage is Crankshaft no longer a risk?"

MCQ Practice Points

Pathomechanics MCQ

Q: At what age does the risk of true pulmonary hypoplasia (loss of alveolar number) significantly decrease? A: Age 8. Fusion after age 8 generally affects lung volume (size) but not alveolar count.

Complication MCQ

Q: What is the most common cause of growing rod failure? A: Anchor failure (Hook/Screw pullout) or Rod Fracture.

Diagnosis MCQ

Q: What clinical sign is most specific for a syrinx in a child with scoliosis? A: Absent abdominal reflexes. (Asymmetrical superficial abdominal reflex).

Treatment MCQ

Q: A 5-year-old has a 60 degree congenital scoliosis (Unilateral unsegmented bar with contralateral hemivertebra). Treatment? A: Fusion. Congenital curves DO NOT respond to bracing. A short fusion of the congenital anomaly is required to stop the "evil" growth mismatch. Growing rods are for long curves (idiopathic/NM).

Neural Axis

Q: What percentage of patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis have a neural axis abnormality (Chiari/Syrinx) on MRI? A: Approximately 20%. This is why MRI is mandatory for all juvenile scoliosis patients.

Australian Context

  • Funding: MCGR (Magnet rods) are funded by the Prostheses List but require specific indication codes.
  • Radiation: Frequent X-rays in juvenile patients raise concerns about breast cancer risk. Most Australian centres use EOS Imaging (Low dose bi-planar slot scanning) which reduces radiation dose by 90% compared to standard digital X-ray.
  • Transition: Dedicated transition clinics exist in major cities to hand over complex juvenile/infantile patients to adult spinal surgeons at age 16-18.

JUVENILE SCOLIOSIS

High-Yield Exam Summary

BASICS

  • •Age 4-10
  • •High Progression
  • •MRI Mandatory
  • •The Grey Zone

RED FLAGS

  • •Left curve
  • •Pain
  • •Neuro Signs
  • •Rapid Increase

THE LUNGS

  • •Alveoli Age 8
  • •TIS Risk
  • •Avoid Early Fusion
  • •Volume is Life

SURGERY

  • •Growing Rods
  • •Shilla
  • •Tethering (VBT)
  • •Delay Fusion

Deep Dive: Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT)

The New Kid on the Block VBT is a "growth modulation" technique (like 8-plates for knees).

  • Indication: Skeletally immature (Risser 0-2), Flexible curve, Age 8-12.
  • Mechanism: Screws placed laterally in vertebral bodies on the convex side. A flexible polyethylene cord connects them. Tension is applied.
  • Result: Compression of the convex growth plate slows growth. Concave side keeps growing. The spine straightens as the child grows.
  • Controversy: High revision rate (tether rupture, over-correction). Long term results unknown. FDA approved (HDE) but still considered "innovative" in many guidelines.

Self-Assessment Quiz

Quick Stats
Reading Time65 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease