Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) Injuries

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) Injuries

Comprehensive guide to LCL injuries - anatomy, Fanelli classification, varus stress testing, isolated vs combined injuries, and evidence-based surgical vs conservative management for orthopaedic exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2024-12-17
High Yield Overview

LCL INJURIES - LATERAL KNEE STABILISER

Sports Medicine | Isolated Usually Non-Operative | Combined Injuries Need Surgery | PLC Assessment Critical

30°Optimal angle for varus stress testing
5mmGrade II opening (5-10mm)
10mm+Grade III opening (surgical)
75%Combined with other ligament injuries

LCL INJURY GRADING

Grade I
PatternMild sprain, under 5mm varus opening
TreatmentFunctional brace, early ROM
Grade II
PatternPartial tear, 5-10mm opening, firm endpoint
TreatmentHinged brace 4-6 weeks
Grade III
PatternComplete tear, over 10mm opening, no endpoint
TreatmentSurgical reconstruction if combined injury

Critical Must-Knows

  • LCL is primary varus stabilizer - especially at 30° flexion when cruciate contribution minimal
  • Isolated LCL injuries are RARE - always assess for PLC injury (popliteus, popliteofibular ligament)
  • Varus stress test at 0° and 30° - opening at 0° indicates combined cruciate injury
  • Peroneal nerve at risk - courses around fibular neck, assess with every lateral knee injury
  • Combined injuries require surgery - isolated Grade III may heal non-operatively, combined do not

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    LCL injury with varus opening at 0° = combined PCL/ACL injury until proven otherwise
  • "
    Always document peroneal nerve function BEFORE any intervention
  • "
    MRI essential to assess PLC structures - isolated LCL rare, combined common
  • "
    Fibular head avulsion is pathognomonic of LCL injury - check X-ray carefully

Critical LCL Injury Exam Points

Isolated LCL is RARE

Only 2% of knee ligament injuries are isolated LCL. When you see lateral instability, always examine for posterolateral corner (PLC) injury. The triad of LCL + popliteus + popliteofibular ligament = complete PLC injury requiring reconstruction.

Peroneal Nerve Risk

Common peroneal nerve wraps around fibular neck - directly adjacent to LCL insertion. Document motor (ankle dorsiflexion, toe extension) and sensory (first web space) function. Nerve injury occurs in 15-20% of Grade III injuries.

Varus at 0° = Combined Injury

At full extension, cruciates provide secondary varus restraint. If varus opens at 0°, you have combined LCL + cruciate injury (usually PCL). This CANNOT be managed non-operatively - needs surgical reconstruction.

Surgery vs Conservative

Isolated Grade I-II: Conservative (hinged brace, PT). Isolated Grade III: May heal non-operatively with bracing. Combined LCL + PLC or cruciate: Surgical reconstruction required for functional stability.

At a Glance - LCL Injury Management

GradeClinical FindingStability TestingTreatment
Grade I (Sprain)Lateral tenderness, no laxityUnder 5mm varus opening at 30°, firm endpointFunctional brace 1-2 weeks, early ROM, PRICE
Grade II (Partial)Moderate pain, mild laxity5-10mm varus opening at 30°, endpoint presentHinged brace 4-6 weeks, protected WB, PT
Grade III IsolatedSevere pain, significant laxityOver 10mm opening at 30° only, no endpointBracing 6-8 weeks may suffice - assess healing at 6 weeks
Grade III + PLCPosterolateral rotatory instabilityVarus + external rotation asymmetry, + dial testSurgical reconstruction (LCL + PLC)
Combined + CruciateMulti-ligament knee injuryVarus opening at 0° AND 30°Staged or simultaneous multi-ligament reconstruction
Mnemonic

FIBLCL Anatomy - 'FIB'

F
From lateral epicondyle
Origin at lateral femoral epicondyle, anterior and distal to popliteus
I
Inserts on fibular head
Attaches to lateral aspect of fibular head (arcuate sign on X-ray)
B
Biceps femoris conjoint
Shares insertion area with biceps femoris tendon

Memory Hook:FIB = Fibula is where LCL ends. Think of a fib (lie) - isolated LCL injury is a 'fib', usually combined!

Mnemonic

LPPPLC Structures - 'LPP'

L
LCL
Primary static varus stabilizer, taut at 30° flexion
P
Popliteus
Dynamic stabilizer, resists external rotation, posterolateral corner anchor
P
Popliteofibular ligament
Connects popliteus to fibular styloid, critical for PLC stability

Memory Hook:LPP = All three make up the posterolateral corner. Like saying 'LP' (long play) Plus - you need all three!

Mnemonic

ZERO-THIRTYVarus Stress Test - 'ZERO THIRTY'

Z
Zero degrees
Tests LCL + cruciates combined - opening = combined injury
E
Extension locks cruciates
At 0°, cruciates provide secondary varus restraint
R
Record opening
Compare to opposite side - under 5mm/5-10mm/over 10mm
O
Open at 0° = combined
Cannot isolate LCL injury if opens at extension
T
Thirty degrees flexion
Isolates LCL (cruciates relax), most sensitive test
H
Hold thigh stable
Stabilize femur, apply varus force to ankle
I
Interpret opening
Grade based on mm: I under 5, II 5-10, III over 10
R
Record endpoint
Firm = partial, soft/absent = complete tear
T
Test both sides
Always compare to contralateral knee
Y
Yes to combined if 0° opens
Cruciate injury confirmed if varus at extension

Memory Hook:Remember: TEST AT 30° to isolate LCL, TEST AT 0° to detect combined injuries

Mnemonic

DANCEPeroneal Nerve Exam - 'DANCE'

D
Dorsiflex ankle
Test tibialis anterior - deep peroneal nerve motor
A
Assess eversion
Test peroneus longus/brevis - superficial peroneal motor
N
Numbness first web space
Deep peroneal sensory territory
C
Check dorsolateral foot
Superficial peroneal sensory territory
E
Extend toes (EHL)
Test extensor hallucis longus - deep peroneal

Memory Hook:Do the DANCE exam - if patient can't dance (foot drop), peroneal nerve is injured!

Overview and Epidemiology

Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) injuries are uncommon in isolation but frequently occur as part of complex multi-ligament knee injuries. The LCL is the primary static stabilizer against varus stress at the knee, working in concert with the posterolateral corner structures.

Key epidemiological points:

  • Isolated LCL injuries are rare (2% of knee ligament injuries) - most occur with PLC/cruciate damage
  • Sports-related: Contact sports (rugby, AFL, American football), skiing
  • Mechanism: Varus force to weight-bearing knee, often with rotation
  • Peak incidence: Males aged 20-40 years in contact sports
  • Australian context: Common in Australian Rules Football due to tackle mechanisms

Clinical significance: The LCL cannot be considered in isolation. Injury to the lateral structures almost always involves the posterolateral corner, and recognition of this combined injury pattern is critical for appropriate management. Failure to identify and treat PLC injuries leads to residual instability and reconstruction failure.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

LCL Structure:

  • Origin: Lateral femoral epicondyle, anterior and distal to popliteus origin
  • Insertion: Lateral aspect of fibular head, conjoint with biceps femoris
  • Length: Approximately 60mm
  • Width: 5-8mm (round, cord-like structure)
  • Course: Extra-articular (unlike MCL, not attached to capsule or meniscus)

Key anatomical relationships: The LCL is separated from the joint by the popliteus tendon. The common peroneal nerve passes 10mm posterior to biceps tendon insertion. The lateral inferior genicular artery runs beneath the LCL. Unlike the MCL, the LCL is not attached to the lateral meniscus (the meniscus has popliteomeniscal fascicles instead).

PLC Components (3 layers):

Layer 1 (Superficial):

  • Iliotibial band (ITB)
  • Biceps femoris tendon

Layer 2 (Middle):

  • Lateral retinaculum
  • Patellofemoral ligaments

Layer 3 (Deep):

  • LCL (fibular collateral ligament)
  • Popliteus muscle and tendon
  • Popliteofibular ligament
  • Arcuate ligament complex
  • Fabellofibular ligament (when fabella present)
  • Lateral capsule

Critical PLC structures: The triad of LCL + popliteus + popliteofibular ligament represents the core PLC. Injury to all three produces significant posterolateral rotatory instability.

Intraoperative photograph showing LCL and lateral knee anatomy
Click to expand
Intraoperative view of lateral knee anatomy during ligament reconstruction demonstrating LCL relationship to adjacent structures - LFC (lateral femoral condyle), ALL (anterolateral ligament), LCL (lateral collateral ligament). Shows surgical anatomy relevant to LCL and posterolateral corner reconstruction.Credit: Via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Coronal MRI showing normal LCL anatomy
Click to expand
Coronal MRI demonstrating normal LCL anatomy - LFE (lateral femoral epicondyle), ALL (anterolateral ligament), LCL (lateral collateral ligament) coursing from lateral femoral epicondyle to FH (fibular head), LTP (lateral tibial plateau). Essential imaging for diagnosing LCL tears.Credit: Via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

LCL Function:

  • Primary varus stabilizer at all flexion angles
  • Maximum constraint at 30° flexion (where cruciates relax)
  • Provides 55% of varus restraint at 5° flexion
  • Provides 69% of varus restraint at 25° flexion

Secondary stabilizers:

  • Cruciates (especially PCL) at 0° extension
  • Popliteus complex
  • ITB
  • Biceps femoris

Varus stress testing biomechanics: At 0° extension, the ACL and PCL are taut and provide secondary varus restraint. At 30° flexion, the cruciates relax and the LCL becomes the isolated primary restraint. Opening at 0° indicates combined LCL plus cruciate injury, while opening only at 30° suggests isolated LCL injury.

Exam Pearl

The LCL is extra-articular and not attached to the lateral meniscus - this is why isolated LCL injuries don't cause meniscal damage. Compare to MCL which is intimately related to the medial meniscus.

Classification Systems

LCL Injury Classification

LCL Injury Classification

GradePathologyVarus Stress at 30°Clinical Features
Grade IMicroscopic fiber damage, ligament intactUnder 5mm opening, firm endpointTenderness, no instability, full ROM
Grade IIPartial macroscopic tear, some fibers intact5-10mm opening, endpoint presentPain with varus stress, mild laxity
Grade IIIComplete tear (midsubstance or avulsion)Over 10mm opening, no endpointGross laxity, may be painless (complete disruption)

Grading is based on varus stress testing at 30° flexion to isolate the LCL.

Fanelli Classification (Combined PLC Injuries)

TypeStructures InvolvedClinical Finding
ALCL isolatedVarus laxity only
BLCL + popliteusVarus + external rotation laxity
CLCL + popliteus + popliteofibularComplete PLC - significant rotatory instability
DPLC + cruciate(s)Multi-ligament knee injury

Combined injury patterns:

  • LCL + PLC: Most common combined pattern (assess with dial test)
  • LCL + PCL: Posterolateral knee dislocation variant
  • LCL + ACL: Less common, high-energy injury
  • Multi-ligament (3+): Knee dislocation spectrum, vascular assessment mandatory

Exam Pearl

Isolated LCL injuries (Fanelli A) can often be managed non-operatively. Combined injuries (Fanelli B, C, D) require surgical reconstruction for functional stability.

History

Mechanism of injury:

  • Varus force to weight-bearing knee (tackle from medial side)
  • Non-contact hyperextension with varus moment
  • Dashboard injury with knee flexed and externally rotated
  • Twisting injury with foot planted

Symptoms:

  • Lateral knee pain (worse with varus stress)
  • Feeling of instability, especially pivoting/cutting
  • "Knee giving way" with combined injuries
  • Pop or snap at time of injury (less common than ACL)

Key questions to ask: Was it contact or non-contact mechanism? What was the direction of force? Was there immediate swelling (suggests cruciate involvement)? Was the patient able to weight-bear after injury? Any previous knee injuries? What are the sport and activity demands?

Examination

Inspection:

  • Lateral ecchymosis (posterolateral suggests PLC)
  • Effusion (intra-articular = cruciate involvement)
  • Gait assessment (varus thrust in chronic injuries)

Palpation:

  • LCL along its course (epicondyle to fibular head)
  • Fibular head (avulsion tenderness)
  • Lateral joint line
  • Peroneal nerve at fibular neck
  • Popliteal fossa (popliteus)

Special tests for LCL/PLC injury:

1. Varus stress test (most important) - Test at 0° extension AND 30° flexion. Grade opening as: I (under 5mm), II (5-10mm), III (over 10mm). Note endpoint quality (firm vs soft).

2. Dial test (external rotation) - Test at 30° and 90° flexion, compare ER asymmetry to contralateral side. Over 10° asymmetry at 30° only indicates isolated PLC injury. Over 10° at both 30° and 90° indicates combined PLC plus PCL injury.

3. Posterolateral drawer - At 90° flexion, apply posterior force with external rotation. Positive test indicates PLC injury.

4. Reverse pivot shift - Extend knee from flexion with valgus and external rotation. A reduction clunk indicates PLC laxity and posterolateral rotatory instability.

Peroneal nerve assessment (MANDATORY):

Motor:

  • Ankle dorsiflexion (tibialis anterior - deep peroneal)
  • Great toe extension (EHL - deep peroneal)
  • Ankle eversion (peronei - superficial peroneal)

Sensory:

  • First web space (deep peroneal)
  • Dorsolateral foot (superficial peroneal)

Vascular:

  • Dorsalis pedis pulse
  • Posterior tibial pulse
  • Cap refill
  • Consider ABI if concern for vascular injury

Document clearly: 16% of Grade III LCL injuries have associated peroneal nerve injury. This must be documented BEFORE any intervention. Always assess vascular status with dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses, capillary refill, and consider ABI if concern for vascular injury.

Peroneal Nerve Documentation

Always document peroneal nerve function (dorsiflexion power, first web space sensation) BEFORE any intervention including bracing, examination under anaesthesia, or surgery. Medicolegal significance is high.

Investigations

Standard views:

  • AP, lateral, skyline views
  • Bilateral weight-bearing if chronic
  • Stress views if diagnosis uncertain

Findings:

  • Arcuate sign: Fibular styloid avulsion (pathognomonic of PLC injury)
  • Segond fracture: Lateral tibial avulsion (anterolateral capsule - suggests ACL injury)
  • Lateral capsular avulsion
  • Fibular head fracture
  • Varus alignment (chronic deficiency)

Stress X-rays: Varus stress at 20° flexion with side-to-side comparison. A difference over 4mm is significant. Useful for pre-operative planning and documenting degree of instability.

Fibular head avulsion fracture (arcuate sign) on X-ray and MRI
Click to expand
Three-panel imaging demonstrating fibular head avulsion fracture (arcuate sign) - (a) AP knee X-ray, (b) sagittal MRI showing knee structures, (c) lateral X-ray clearly showing displaced fibular head fragment. Arcuate sign is pathognomonic for LCL/posterolateral corner injury.Credit: Via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Gold standard for soft tissue assessment

LCL findings:

  • Increased T2 signal (edema/tear)
  • Discontinuity (complete tear)
  • Bony avulsion at fibula/epicondyle
  • "Wavy" appearance (chronic elongation)

PLC structures to assess:

  • Popliteus tendon/muscle
  • Popliteofibular ligament
  • Arcuate ligament
  • Lateral capsule
  • Bone bruise pattern (lateral femoral condyle, medial tibial plateau = PLC mechanism)

Associated injuries:

  • PCL/ACL status
  • Menisci
  • Cartilage
  • Peroneal nerve (signal change)

MRI sensitivity: 90-95% for complete LCL tears, somewhat lower for partial tears.

Vascular assessment (if concern):

  • ABI (Ankle-Brachial Index): Under 0.9 abnormal
  • CT angiography if suspicion of vascular injury
  • Duplex ultrasound

Nerve studies:

  • EMG/NCS if peroneal nerve injury suspected
  • Timing: 3 weeks post-injury for wallerian degeneration

EUA (Examination Under Anaesthesia): Indicated if pain precludes adequate examination. Often combined with arthroscopy for intra-articular assessment. Document all stability testing findings carefully during EUA.

Exam Pearl

The "arcuate sign" (avulsion of fibular styloid process) on X-ray is pathognomonic of PLC injury. Don't miss this - look carefully at the fibular head on every lateral knee X-ray!

Non-Operative Management

Indications for conservative management:

  • Grade I injuries (all)
  • Grade II injuries (most)
  • Isolated Grade III injuries (selected cases)
  • Elderly/low-demand patients
  • Significant medical comorbidities

Acute phase (Week 0-1):

  • PRICE protocol (Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation)
  • Functional hinged brace (optional)
  • Weight-bearing as tolerated
  • NSAIDs for pain/inflammation

Recovery phase (Week 1-3):

  • ROM exercises (aim full ROM by 2 weeks)
  • Quadriceps and hamstring strengthening
  • Proprioception exercises
  • Stationary cycling

Return to sport (Week 3-6):

  • Sport-specific drills
  • Functional brace for contact sports initially
  • Full return when strength 90% and no pain with stress

Expected outcome: Full recovery, 2-4 weeks typical

Acute phase (Week 0-2):

  • Hinged knee brace locked 0-90° initially
  • Protected weight-bearing with crutches
  • Ice, compression, elevation
  • Gentle ROM within brace limits

Progressive phase (Week 2-6):

  • Increase brace ROM weekly
  • Progress to full weight-bearing
  • Quadriceps/hamstring strengthening
  • Pool exercises when wound healed
  • Proprioception training

Functional phase (Week 6-12):

  • Wean from brace
  • Sport-specific rehabilitation
  • Agility and plyometric progression
  • Functional testing before return

Expected outcome: Return to sport 6-12 weeks, excellent prognosis

Bracing protocol:

  • Hinged brace locked in extension initially
  • Progress ROM weekly based on healing
  • 6-8 weeks in brace minimum

Rehabilitation:

  • Protected weight-bearing 2-4 weeks
  • Early ROM to prevent stiffness
  • Progressive strengthening
  • Assess stability at 6 weeks

If healed (stable at 6 weeks):

  • Continue rehabilitation
  • Return to sport 3-4 months
  • May have mild residual laxity but functional stability

If unstable at 6 weeks:

  • Consider delayed reconstruction
  • Especially if symptomatic instability
  • Combined with any cruciate reconstruction

Key: Close follow-up essential, as some will need surgery

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
lcl injuries management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for lcl injuriesCredit: OrthoVellum

LCL Injury Management Decision Tree

Injury PatternInitial AssessmentManagementTimeline
Grade I IsolatedUnder 5mm varus, firm endpointFunctional treatment, early ROMReturn 2-4 weeks
Grade II Isolated5-10mm varus, endpoint presentHinged brace 4-6 weeks, PTReturn 6-12 weeks
Grade III IsolatedOver 10mm varus at 30° onlyTrial bracing 6-8 weeks, reassessSurgery if persistent laxity
Grade III + PLCVarus + external rotation asymmetrySurgical reconstruction (LCL + PLC)Surgery within 2-3 weeks ideal
Combined + CruciateVarus at 0° AND 30°, + cruciate testsMulti-ligament reconstructionStaged or single-stage, surgeon preference

Treatment decisions are based on injury severity, associated structures, and patient demands.

Multiligament knee injury with surgical reconstruction
Click to expand
Three-panel imaging showing multiligament knee injury management - (a) AP X-ray showing initial injury, (b) sagittal MRI demonstrating ligamentous disruption, (c) post-operative lateral X-ray with surgical hardware for fracture fixation. Demonstrates the reality that most LCL injuries are part of complex multiligament knee injuries requiring surgical reconstruction.Credit: Via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Surgical Timing Guidelines

Acute Phase (under 3 weeks):

  • Best window for primary repair
  • Tissue quality allows direct suturing
  • Consider augmentation with internal brace

Subacute Phase (3-6 weeks):

  • Repair possible if tissue quality adequate
  • Increased risk of scarring affecting reduction
  • Assessment of tissue viability critical

Chronic Phase (over 6 weeks):

  • Primary repair not possible
  • Reconstruction with graft required
  • May need staged approach if multiple ligaments

Exam Pearl

Timing of surgery matters: Acute repair/reconstruction within 2-3 weeks has better outcomes than delayed surgery. Chronic cases often require more complex reconstruction with grafts.

Surgical Management

Absolute surgical indications:

  • Combined LCL + PLC injury (Fanelli B/C)
  • Combined LCL + cruciate injury
  • Multi-ligament knee injury
  • Bony avulsion with displacement (repair/fixation)
  • Peroneal nerve injury requiring exploration
  • Failed non-operative treatment of isolated Grade III

Relative surgical indications:

  • High-demand athlete with isolated Grade III
  • Persistent symptomatic instability
  • Varus thrust gait in chronic injury

Timing: Acute injuries (under 3 weeks) allow primary repair or augmented repair. Subacute injuries (3-6 weeks) can be repaired if tissue quality is adequate. Chronic injuries (over 6 weeks) require reconstruction as tissue is not repairable.

Acute repair:

  • Direct suture repair of torn ligament
  • Anchor fixation if bony avulsion
  • May augment with internal brace

LCL reconstruction (chronic):

  • Graft options: Hamstring autograft, allograft (Achilles, tibialis anterior)
  • Technique: Anatomic tunnels at femoral epicondyle and fibular head
  • Fixation: Interference screws, suspensory fixation

PLC reconstruction (Larson technique):

  • Figure-of-eight graft reconstruction
  • Recreates LCL and popliteofibular ligament
  • Single graft through fibular tunnel, two femoral tunnels

LaPrade anatomic reconstruction:

  • Two separate grafts: LCL and popliteofibular
  • Most anatomic reconstruction
  • Technically demanding but excellent outcomes

Combined procedures: LCL/PLC can be combined with PCL reconstruction or ACL reconstruction (less common). May stage or perform simultaneously depending on tissue quality and surgeon preference.

Approach:

  • Lateral or posterolateral incision
  • Identify and protect peroneal nerve FIRST
  • Full exposure of fibular head

Graft passage:

  • Fibular tunnel: Anterior to posterior
  • Protect neurovascular structures
  • Graft fixed in 30° flexion, neutral rotation

Tension:

  • LCL tensioned at 30° flexion
  • PLC structures tensioned at 30° flexion, neutral rotation
  • Avoid over-constraint

Common errors to avoid: Non-anatomic tunnel placement, over-tensioning which restricts motion, failure to address all injured structures, and missing concomitant cruciate injury are the most frequent technical errors leading to suboptimal outcomes.

Complications

Complications of LCL Injuries and Treatment

ComplicationRisk FactorsPrevention/Management
Peroneal nerve injuryGrade III injury, posterolateral trauma, fibular fractureDocument pre-op function, careful dissection, explore if no recovery by 3 months
Residual instabilityMissed PLC injury, inadequate reconstruction, non-anatomic repairComplete assessment pre-op, anatomic reconstruction technique
StiffnessProlonged immobilization, associated intra-articular injuryEarly ROM, avoid over-tensioning graft
Varus thrust gaitChronic instability, failed treatmentCorrect with reconstruction, may need HTO for varus malalignment
Cruciate reconstruction failureUntreated posterolateral instabilityAlways address PLC with cruciate reconstruction

Critical point: Untreated posterolateral corner injury is the most common cause of ACL and PCL reconstruction failure. The lateral structures must be addressed to protect cruciate grafts.

Postoperative Care

Protection Phase

Hinged brace locked at 0°, toe-touch weight-bearing, ice and elevation, gentle quad sets, ankle pumps. No active hamstring exercises (protects PLC repair).

Early Motion Phase

Progress ROM in brace (0-90° by week 4, full by week 6), progress to 50% weight-bearing by week 4, stationary cycling, pool exercises, continue quad strengthening.

Strengthening Phase

Full weight-bearing, wean from brace by week 8, closed chain exercises, proprioception training, progress strengthening, avoid pivoting/cutting.

Functional Phase

Sport-specific training progression, agility drills (straight-line first, then cutting), plyometrics, functional testing at 6 months.

Return to Sport

Full return when passing functional tests (hop tests over 90%, isokinetic strength over 85%), sport-specific brace recommended for first season, ongoing maintenance program.

Exam Pearl

Avoid active hamstring exercises in early postoperative period - the biceps femoris inserts with the LCL and can stress the reconstruction. Quad-dominant rehabilitation initially.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Non-operative outcomes:

  • Grade I: 100% return to sport, no residual laxity
  • Grade II: 95%+ return to sport, minimal residual laxity
  • Isolated Grade III: 70-80% satisfactory with bracing, 20-30% need delayed surgery

Surgical outcomes:

ProcedureReturn to SportStability RestorationComplications
Acute LCL repair85-90%90%+Under 5%
Chronic LCL reconstruction75-85%80-90%5-10%
Combined LCL/PLC reconstruction70-80%75-85%10-15%
Multi-ligament reconstruction60-75%70-85%15-20%

Factors affecting outcome:

  • Positive: Acute surgery, isolated injury, young patient, anatomic technique
  • Negative: Chronic injury, multi-ligament, varus alignment, nerve injury

Australian context:

  • Private health insurance generally covers reconstruction
  • Public wait times may delay optimal surgical timing
  • Medicare rebates available for reconstruction procedures

Evidence Base

LaPrade Anatomic PLC Reconstruction

IV
LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, et al. • Arthroscopy (2004)
Key Findings:
  • Anatomic two-graft reconstruction restores varus and rotational stability
  • Superior biomechanical restoration compared to single-graft techniques
  • Technique recreates LCL and popliteofibular ligament separately
  • Now considered gold standard for PLC reconstruction
Clinical Implication: Anatomic reconstruction with separate grafts for LCL and popliteofibular ligament provides best restoration of lateral stability.

Isolated vs Combined LCL Injuries

III
Stannard JP, Brown SL, Robinson JT, et al. • J Orthop Trauma (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Isolated LCL injuries can heal with non-operative treatment
  • Combined LCL/PLC injuries require surgical reconstruction
  • Failure to address PLC leads to chronic instability
  • Acute repair has better outcomes than delayed reconstruction
Clinical Implication: Combined injuries require surgery; isolated injuries may heal conservatively but need close follow-up.

PLC Injury Recognition

IV
Pacheco RJ, Ayre CA, Bollen SR • Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2011)
Key Findings:
  • PLC injuries frequently missed on initial assessment
  • Dial test at 30° most sensitive for isolated PLC
  • Combined PCL/PLC shows asymmetry at 30° and 90°
  • MRI sensitivity improved with specific protocols
Clinical Implication: Always perform dial test at 30° AND 90° to differentiate isolated PLC from combined PCL/PLC injuries.

Effect of Untreated PLC on Cruciate Reconstruction

II
LaPrade RF, Resig S, Wentorf FA, et al. • Am J Sports Med (1999)
Key Findings:
  • Untreated Grade III PLC injury increases ACL graft forces by 4x
  • PCL graft forces increased 2-3x with PLC deficiency
  • Most common cause of cruciate reconstruction failure is untreated PLC
  • PLC must be addressed at time of cruciate reconstruction
Clinical Implication: CRITICAL: Always reconstruct PLC when performing cruciate reconstruction to prevent graft failure.

Peroneal Nerve Injury in Lateral Knee Trauma

IV
Niall DM, Nutton RW, Keating JF • Injury (2005)
Key Findings:
  • 16% incidence of peroneal nerve injury with Grade III LCL
  • 85% of neurapraxias recover spontaneously
  • Axonotmesis may require up to 18 months for recovery
  • Early exploration if no recovery by 3 months
Clinical Implication: Document peroneal nerve function before any intervention; most recover but need monitoring.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Acute Grade III LCL with Peroneal Nerve Palsy

EXAMINER

"25-year-old rugby player presents after a tackle from the medial side. Has lateral knee pain and weakness of ankle dorsiflexion. X-ray shows fibular styloid avulsion (arcuate sign). Varus stress at 30° shows over 10mm opening. Varus at 0° is normal."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Structured approach:

  1. Immediate assessment: Document complete neurological exam - motor (dorsiflexion MRC grade), sensory (first web space), vascular status
  2. Diagnosis: Grade III LCL injury with fibular avulsion (arcuate sign) and peroneal nerve neuropraxia. Likely isolated LCL (varus stable at 0°) but need MRI to assess PLC
  3. Investigations: MRI to assess PLC structures, confirm isolated vs combined injury
  4. Management:
    • If isolated LCL with bony avulsion: ORIF of fibular avulsion fragment (restores LCL tension)
    • Explore peroneal nerve intraoperatively - decompress if in continuity
    • Hinged brace postoperatively, early ROM
  5. Nerve management: If neurapraxia - expect recovery, monitor clinically. If no recovery by 3 months, nerve conduction studies and consider exploration
  6. Follow-up: Clinical review at 2, 6, 12 weeks. Assess stability and nerve recovery
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Document peroneal nerve BEFORE any intervention
Arcuate sign = PLC injury
Varus stable at 0° = isolated LCL likely
Bony avulsion allows direct repair/ORIF
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not documenting nerve status pre-op
✗Missing PLC component
✗Delaying surgical management
✗Not exploring nerve if palsy present
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if nerve doesn't recover by 3 months?"
"How do you interpret the dial test here?"
"What are the recovery expectations for neurapraxia?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Combined LCL/PLC Injury

EXAMINER

"30-year-old AFL player has lateral knee injury. Varus stress positive at 30° (Grade III). Dial test shows 15° external rotation asymmetry at 30° but not at 90°. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Analysis:

  • Dial test interpretation: Asymmetry at 30° but NOT at 90° indicates isolated PLC injury (PCL intact). Asymmetry at both 30° and 90° would indicate combined PCL/PLC
  • Diagnosis: Grade III LCL injury with posterolateral corner (PLC) injury - Fanelli Type C (complete PLC)

Management:

  1. MRI: Confirm PLC structures involved (popliteus, popliteofibular ligament)
  2. Surgical reconstruction: This CANNOT be managed non-operatively. Combined PLC injuries do not heal and lead to chronic instability
  3. Timing: Ideally within 2-3 weeks for best outcomes
  4. Technique: LaPrade anatomic reconstruction - two grafts (LCL + popliteofibular ligament) or Larson technique (single graft)
  5. Rehabilitation: Protected weight-bearing 4-6 weeks, brace for 8 weeks, avoid hamstring exercises early, return to sport 6-9 months
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Dial test at 30° only = isolated PLC
Dial at 30° AND 90° = PLC plus PCL
Combined PLC requires surgery
LaPrade technique is gold standard
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting non-operative for combined injury
✗Confusing dial test interpretation
✗Delaying beyond 2-3 weeks
✗Single-graft vs two-graft confusion
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How does dial test differ from varus stress?"
"What is the Larson technique?"
"Why avoid hamstrings early post-op?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Failed ACL Reconstruction with Lateral Laxity

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old presents 18 months after ACL reconstruction with recurrent instability. Original MRI showed isolated ACL tear. Examination shows 2+ Lachman and Grade II varus laxity. What happened?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Analysis:

  • Key point: Untreated posterolateral corner deficiency is the most common cause of ACL reconstruction failure
  • What happened: PLC injury was missed at initial presentation. The lateral laxity stressed the ACL graft, leading to stretching/failure
  • Why missed: PLC injuries can be subtle on MRI and examination when patient is guarding

Management now:

  1. Investigations: New MRI to assess ACL graft (stretched vs ruptured), PLC structures, alignment
  2. Standing alignment X-rays: Check for varus malalignment (may need HTO)
  3. Surgical plan:
    • Revision ACL reconstruction (new tunnels if needed)
    • Concurrent PLC reconstruction (LaPrade technique)
    • If varus alignment over 3°: Staged or concurrent HTO
  4. Key learning: ALWAYS examine for PLC injury with ACL tears - dial test, varus stress at 30°. Address lateral corner at time of ACL reconstruction
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Untreated PLC is #1 cause of ACL graft failure
Always assess PLC with ACL injuries
Requires revision ACL plus PLC reconstruction
May need HTO if varus alignment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Revising ACL without addressing PLC
✗Missing varus malalignment
✗Not checking alignment films
✗Single-stage vs staged approach confusion
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you counsel this patient?"
"What is the role of HTO here?"
"How do you assess ACL graft integrity on MRI?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Chronic Varus Thrust Gait

EXAMINER

"45-year-old presents with lateral knee pain and 'knee bowing outward' when walking. History of knee injury 5 years ago, managed conservatively. Standing alignment shows 8° varus. Stress testing shows Grade II varus laxity."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Diagnosis: Chronic PLC/LCL deficiency with secondary varus malalignment and early lateral compartment OA

Assessment:

  • Weight-bearing long leg alignment films
  • MRI: Assess LCL/PLC, lateral compartment cartilage, meniscus
  • Stress X-rays to quantify laxity

Management considerations:

  1. If minimal OA, symptomatic instability:
    • High tibial osteotomy (HTO) to correct alignment first
    • Staged or concurrent PLC reconstruction
    • HTO unloads lateral compartment and reduces stress on reconstruction
  2. If significant lateral OA:
    • May need to consider arthroplasty in future
    • Instability reconstruction less likely to succeed with OA
  3. Rehabilitation:
    • Quadriceps strengthening (reduces varus thrust)
    • Lateral heel wedge insoles (temporizing measure)
    • Unloader brace

Key point: Chronic cases need alignment correction before or with ligament reconstruction.

KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Chronic cases need HTO for alignment correction
Assess OA status before planning surgery
Varus thrust indicates functional instability
May need staged approach
COMMON TRAPS
✗Reconstructing ligaments without correcting alignment
✗Missing lateral OA
✗Ignoring conservative options in older patient
✗Not obtaining weight-bearing films
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the role of unloader bracing?"
"How does HTO protect a reconstruction?"
"What are contraindications to ligament reconstruction?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the primary restraint to varus stress at 30 degrees knee flexion? A: The lateral collateral ligament (LCL) is the primary varus stabilizer, providing 69% of varus restraint at 25-30 degrees flexion. At this angle, the cruciates relax making the LCL the isolated primary restraint.

Exam Pearl

Q: What does varus opening at both 0 and 30 degrees indicate? A: Combined injury to both the LCL AND the cruciate ligaments (particularly PCL). Opening only at 30 degrees suggests isolated LCL injury since the cruciates are taut at 0 degrees and contribute to varus restraint.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the dial test and what does asymmetry at 30 degrees only indicate? A: The dial test assesses external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. Asymmetry greater than 10 degrees at 30 degrees ONLY indicates isolated PLC injury. Asymmetry at BOTH 30 and 90 degrees indicates combined PLC plus PCL injury.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the arcuate sign? A: A small avulsion fracture of the fibular styloid on AP knee radiograph. It is pathognomonic of posterolateral corner (PLC) injury and indicates avulsion of the conjoint tendon insertion (LCL plus biceps femoris).

Exam Pearl

Q: Why is untreated PLC injury important in ACL reconstruction? A: Untreated posterolateral corner instability is the NUMBER ONE cause of ACL graft failure. The abnormal tibial external rotation places excessive stress on the ACL graft, leading to elongation or rupture.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the relationship between the common peroneal nerve and the LCL? A: The common peroneal nerve passes approximately 10mm posterior to the biceps femoris tendon at the fibular head level. Up to 16% of Grade III LCL injuries have associated peroneal nerve injury.

Australian Context

LCL and posterolateral corner injuries are commonly seen in Australian contact sports including Australian Rules Football (AFL), Rugby League, and Rugby Union. The mechanism of a tackle from the medial side producing varus force is typical in these sports.

Most complex PLC reconstructions are performed in the private sector at major sports medicine centres in Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane. Public hospital wait times may delay optimal surgical timing, which ideally should be within 2-3 weeks for acute injuries. Regional patients often require transfer to metropolitan centres for complex multi-ligament reconstruction.

Sports Medicine Australia provides position statements on return to play criteria. Most Australian surgeons follow international guidelines from ESSKA and AOSSM for management algorithms. Rehabilitation typically involves sports physiotherapists experienced in post-ligament reconstruction protocols.

LCL INJURIES

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Numbers

  • •30° flexion - optimal angle for varus stress testing (isolates LCL)
  • •Under 5mm opening = Grade I, 5-10mm = Grade II, over 10mm = Grade III
  • •Dial test: over 10° asymmetry at 30° = PLC injury; both 30° and 90° = PLC + PCL
  • •2% of knee ligament injuries are isolated LCL (most are combined)
  • •16% peroneal nerve injury rate with Grade III LCL injuries

Critical Concepts

  • •Isolated LCL injury is RARE - always assess PLC
  • •Varus opening at 0° = combined LCL + cruciate injury
  • •Peroneal nerve documentation BEFORE any intervention is mandatory
  • •Untreated PLC is #1 cause of ACL/PCL reconstruction failure
  • •Acute repair/reconstruction (under 3 weeks) has better outcomes

Must-Know Anatomy

  • •LCL: Lateral epicondyle to fibular head (extra-articular)
  • •PLC triad: LCL + popliteus + popliteofibular ligament
  • •Peroneal nerve: 10mm posterior to biceps tendon at fibular neck
  • •Arcuate sign: Fibular styloid avulsion = PLC injury

Management Principles

  • •Grade I-II isolated: Non-operative (brace, PT)
  • •Grade III isolated: Trial bracing, surgery if fails
  • •Combined LCL + PLC: Surgical reconstruction required
  • •Combined + cruciate: Address all structures, PLC protects graft
  • •Chronic instability + varus: HTO before or with reconstruction

Viva Pearls

  • •Always examine BOTH 0° and 30° for varus stress
  • •Dial test at 30° AND 90° differentiates PLC vs PLC+PCL
  • •Check peroneal nerve before doing ANYTHING
  • •Failed cruciate reconstruction - think missed PLC injury
  • •Chronic varus thrust needs alignment correction first
Quick Stats
Reading Time102 min
Related Topics

AC Joint Injuries in Athletes

Achilles Tendinopathy

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Anterior Shoulder Instability