Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Liposarcoma

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Liposarcoma

Malignant adipocytic tumor - most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults with variable prognosis based on histological subtype

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

LIPOSARCOMA

Malignant Adipocytic Tumor | Most Common Adult Sarcoma | Variable Prognosis by Subtype

24%of all soft tissue sarcomas
50-65 yearspeak age at diagnosis
MDM2+diagnostic marker for well-differentiated type
60-80%5-year survival for extremity well-differentiated

WHO Histological Classification

Well-differentiated (40-45%)
PatternAtypical lipomatous tumor, MDM2 positive
TreatmentWide excision, excellent prognosis
Dedifferentiated (10-15%)
PatternHigh-grade areas within well-differentiated
TreatmentWide excision, chemo, worse prognosis
Myxoid (30-35%)
PatternMyxoid matrix, FUS-DDIT3 fusion
TreatmentWide excision, radiosensitive
Pleomorphic (5-10%)
PatternHigh-grade, poor differentiation
TreatmentWide excision, chemo, poorest prognosis

Critical Must-Knows

  • Most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults (24% of all sarcomas)
  • Well-differentiated liposarcoma (atypical lipomatous tumor) has excellent prognosis in extremity
  • MDM2 amplification distinguishes well-differentiated liposarcoma from lipoma
  • Dedifferentiated liposarcoma has high metastatic potential (15-30%)
  • Wide excision with negative margins is cornerstone of treatment

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Atypical lipomatous tumor and well-differentiated liposarcoma are same entity, different names by location
  • "
    Myxoid liposarcoma is radiosensitive unlike other sarcomas
  • "
    Retroperitoneal liposarcomas have worse prognosis than extremity due to margins
  • "
    Round cell variant of myxoid has worse prognosis and higher metastatic rate

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

3-panel: Myxoid liposarcoma of thigh with coronal MRI, axial CT, and axial MRI
Click to expand
3-panel: Myxoid liposarcoma of thigh with coronal MRI, axial CT, and axial MRICredit: Loubignac F et al., World J Surg Oncol via Open-i (NIH) - PMC2678127 (CC-BY)
2-panel: Pleomorphic liposarcoma with contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted MRI
Click to expand
2-panel: Pleomorphic liposarcoma with contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted MRICredit: Shin NY et al., Korean J Radiol via Open-i (NIH) - PMC2864861 (CC-BY)
2-panel: Well-differentiated liposarcoma mimicking lipoma on MRI (T1 and T2)
Click to expand
2-panel: Well-differentiated liposarcoma mimicking lipoma on MRI (T1 and T2)Credit: O'Donnell PW et al., Sarcoma via Open-i (NIH) - PMC3872425 (CC-BY)
Myxoid liposarcoma of thigh on MRI
Click to expand
Myxoid liposarcoma of the thigh demonstrating characteristic MRI appearance. (A) Coronal MRI showing large intramuscular mass with high T2 signal due to myxoid matrix - the 'lacy' appearance is typical. (B) Axial CT and (C) axial MRI showing the tumor's relationship to surrounding structures. Myxoid liposarcoma has minimal fat content unlike well-differentiated subtype, and is uniquely radiosensitive among soft tissue sarcomas.Credit: Loubignac F et al., World J Surg Oncol - CC-BY

Critical Liposarcoma Exam Points

Histological Subtypes and Prognosis

Well-differentiated (best), myxoid (intermediate), dedifferentiated/pleomorphic (worst) - Subtype determines prognosis and treatment. Five-year survival ranges from 80% for well-differentiated extremity lesions to 30% for pleomorphic.

Molecular Diagnostics

MDM2 amplification for well-differentiated, FUS-DDIT3 fusion for myxoid - Molecular testing is diagnostic. MDM2 positive distinguishes atypical lipomatous tumor from benign lipoma. FUS-DDIT3 confirms myxoid subtype.

Surgical Margins

Wide excision with 1-2cm margins - Margin status is most important prognostic factor. Positive margins lead to 30-50% local recurrence. Re-excision mandatory if margins positive.

Adjuvant Therapy

Radiation for high-grade, chemotherapy for dedifferentiated/pleomorphic - Myxoid liposarcoma is uniquely radiosensitive. Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for high-grade subtypes.

Mnemonic

WDMPLiposarcoma WHO Subtypes (Prognosis Order)

W
Well-differentiated (Best)
ALT, MDM2+, 80% 5-year survival extremity
D
Dedifferentiated (Poor)
High-grade areas, 30-40% 5-year survival
M
Myxoid (Intermediate)
FUS-DDIT3, 70% 5-year survival, radiosensitive
P
Pleomorphic (Worst)
High-grade, 30% 5-year survival

Memory Hook:WDMP - prognosis goes from Well (best) to Pleomorphic (worst) in alphabetical order!

Overview and Epidemiology

Liposarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults, accounting for 20-24% of all adult sarcomas. Unlike lipoma (benign adipocytic tumor), liposarcoma demonstrates malignant potential with capacity for local recurrence and distant metastasis. The tumor arises from primitive mesenchymal cells rather than mature adipocytes, explaining its variable differentiation and behavior.

Nomenclature Distinction

Atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) versus well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS): These are the SAME entity. Extremity/superficial lesions are called ALT due to negligible metastatic potential. Deep-seated retroperitoneal lesions are called WDLS due to higher recurrence risk from incomplete excision. Both show MDM2 amplification.

Demographics

  • Age: Peak 50-65 years (median 55)
  • Gender: Slight male predominance (M:F 1.2:1)
  • Location: 75% extremity or trunk, 25% retroperitoneum
  • Hereditary: Rare Li-Fraumeni syndrome cases

Location Distribution

  • Extremity: 60% (thigh most common)
  • Retroperitoneum: 20% (worse prognosis)
  • Trunk: 15%
  • Head/neck: 5% (rare)

Pathophysiology and Anatomy

Anatomical Distribution

Liposarcomas arise from mesenchymal precursors and can develop in any location with adipose tissue. Location significantly impacts surgical approach and prognosis.

LocationFrequencyAnatomical ConsiderationsPrognosis Impact
Thigh (anterior/posterior)40%Deep compartments, femoral vessels/nerve proximityBest prognosis, limb salvage greater than 95%
Retroperitoneum20%Large at diagnosis, organ displacement, IVC/aorta adjacentWorse prognosis, 40% recurrence
Trunk/shoulder15%Variable depth, chest/abdominal wallIntermediate prognosis
Arm/forearm15%Smaller compartments, neurovascular proximityGood, smaller tumors
Head/neck5%Rare, complex anatomyVariable by site

Tumor Biology

Cellular Origin

  • Arises from mesenchymal stem cells (not mature adipocytes)
  • Clonal chromosomal aberrations (MDM2, FUS-DDIT3)
  • Variable differentiation determines subtype
  • Can dedifferentiate over time (worse prognosis)

Compartmental Spread

  • Respects fascial boundaries initially
  • Intramuscular spread along muscle fibers
  • Eventually breaks through compartments
  • Retroperitoneal tumors infiltrate adjacent organs

Classification Systems

WHO 2020 Classification of Liposarcoma

SubtypeFrequencyKey FeaturesMolecular Marker5-Year Survival
Well-differentiated (ALT)40-45%Mature fat with atypical cells, thick septaMDM2/CDK4 amplification80-90% (extremity)
Dedifferentiated10-15%High-grade non-lipogenic within well-diffMDM2+ with high-grade areas30-40%
Myxoid25-30%Myxoid matrix, lipoblasts, arborizing vesselsFUS-DDIT3 fusion70%
Round cell (high-grade myxoid)5%greater than 5% round cells in myxoid backgroundFUS-DDIT3 fusion40%
Pleomorphic5-10%High-grade, pleomorphic lipoblastsComplex karyotype30%

Classification determines treatment approach all prognosis.

AJCC 8th Edition Staging

StageTGrade5-Year Survival
IAT1 (≤5cm)Low (G1)90%
IBT2 (5-10cm) or T3 (greater than 10cm superficial)Low (G1)80%
IIT4 (greater than 10cm deep)Low (G1)75%
IIIAT1High (G2-3)60%
IIIBT2-4High (G2-3)50%
IVAny T, M1Any grade15-20%

Staging guides treatment intensity and adjuvant therapy decisions.

Histology and Molecular Pathology

WHO Classification (2020)

The WHO classifies liposarcoma into four main subtypes based on histological and molecular features. This classification has direct prognostic and therapeutic implications.

SubtypeFrequencyMolecular Marker5-Year Survival
Well-differentiated (ALT)40-45%MDM2/CDK4 amplification80-90% (extremity)
Myxoid/Round cell30-35%FUS-DDIT3 fusion (t12;16)70% (myxoid), 30% (round cell)
Dedifferentiated10-15%MDM2+ with high-grade areas30-40%
Pleomorphic5-10%Complex karyotype, no specific marker30%

Molecular Diagnostics

Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma

MDM2 amplification is the diagnostic hallmark of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Testing methods:

  • FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization): Gold standard
  • Immunohistochemistry: Screening tool (MDM2 and CDK4 overexpression)
  • Next-generation sequencing: Can detect amplification

Clinical significance:

  • Positive MDM2 confirms diagnosis (distinguishes from lipoma)
  • Negative MDM2 excludes well-differentiated/dedifferentiated subtype
  • Helps guide surgical planning (wide margins required)

MDM2 testing is essential for any deep or large fatty tumor to distinguish benign lipoma from atypical lipomatous tumor.

Myxoid Liposarcoma

FUS-DDIT3 fusion (t12;16 translocation) is pathognomonic for myxoid liposarcoma.

Testing methods:

  • RT-PCR: Detects fusion transcript
  • FISH: Break-apart probes for FUS and DDIT3
  • Karyotype: Can identify t(12;16) translocation

Clinical significance:

  • Confirms myxoid subtype diagnosis
  • Negative fusion excludes myxoid liposarcoma
  • Associated with radiosensitivity (treatment implication)
  • Round cell variant (greater than 5% round cells) has worse prognosis

Alternative fusion EWSR1-DDIT3 (t12;22) occurs in 5% of myxoid liposarcomas.

Pathology Pitfalls

Diagnostic errors to avoid:

  • Pleomorphic lipoma (benign with bizarre nuclei) versus pleomorphic liposarcoma: MDM2 negative in benign variant
  • Spindle cell lipoma versus spindle cell liposarcoma: Clinical and molecular distinction essential
  • Myxoid liposarcoma versus myxofibrosarcoma: FUS-DDIT3 testing differentiates
  • Well-differentiated liposarcoma versus lipoma: MDM2 amplification is key
Mnemonic

MFMolecular Markers for Liposarcoma Diagnosis

M
MDM2 for Well-differentiated
MDM2 and CDK4 amplification diagnostic for ALT/WDLS
F
FUS-DDIT3 for myxoiD
FUS-DDIT3 fusion (t12;16) confirms myxoid subtype

Memory Hook:MF = Molecular Fingerprints - MDM2 for Well-differentiated, FUS for myxoiD!

Clinical Assessment

History

Presenting Symptoms

  • Painless mass: Most common (70-80%)
  • Growing mass: Noticed over months
  • Pain: 20-30% (compression of nerves/vessels)
  • Functional impairment: Large masses affecting movement

Red Flags for High-Grade

  • Rapid growth: Over weeks to months
  • Systemic symptoms: Weight loss, malaise
  • Large size: Greater than 10cm
  • Deep location: Retroperitoneal or intramuscular

Physical Examination

Examination Approach

Step 1Inspection

Observe:

  • Size (measure in cm)
  • Location (superficial vs deep)
  • Skin changes (rare except for large tumors)
  • Asymmetry of limb
Step 2Palpation

Assess:

  • Consistency (firm to hard; unlike soft lipomas)
  • Mobility (deep lesions fixed to fascia/muscle)
  • Tenderness (usually non-tender)
  • Fixation to skin or deep structures
Step 3Neurovascular Exam

Document:

  • Distal pulses
  • Sensory and motor function
  • Nerve compression signs
  • Vascular compression (venous congestion)
Step 4Regional Nodes

Palpate regional lymph nodes (nodal metastasis rare in sarcomas but check baseline)

Lymph node involvement uncommon in liposarcoma (less than 5% except for myxoid round cell variant).

Investigations and Staging

Imaging Protocol

MRI (Investigation of Choice)

MRI is the gold standard for local staging of soft tissue sarcomas.

Protocol:

  • T1-weighted: Anatomical detail, fat signal
  • T2-weighted with fat suppression: Tumor extent, edema
  • Post-contrast T1 with fat suppression: Enhancement pattern
  • Include entire muscle compartment plus joint above and below

Features of Liposarcoma:

SubtypeMRI Characteristics
Well-differentiatedPredominantly fat signal with thick septa (greater than 2mm), nodular areas
DedifferentiatedMixed fat and solid enhancing areas (high-grade component)
MyxoidHigh T2 signal (myxoid matrix), minimal fat, lacy enhancement
PleomorphicHeterogeneous, minimal fat, irregular enhancement, necrosis

MRI guides biopsy planning and surgical approach.

Pleomorphic liposarcoma on CT and MRI
Click to expand
Pleomorphic liposarcoma in a 30-year-old woman. (A) Axial contrast-enhanced CT shows heterogeneous enhancing retroperitoneal mass. (B) Axial T2-weighted MRI demonstrates heterogeneous signal with areas of necrosis. Pleomorphic liposarcoma has minimal fat content, high-grade features, and the poorest prognosis among liposarcoma subtypes with 30% 5-year survival.Credit: Shin NY et al., Korean J Radiol - CC-BY
Low-grade liposarcoma on MRI mimicking lipoma
Click to expand
Low-grade (well-differentiated) liposarcoma demonstrating the challenge of distinguishing from lipoma. Axial T1-weighted (left) and T2-weighted (right) MRI show a predominantly fatty intramuscular mass. Despite benign radiographic appearance, pathology confirmed liposarcoma. Features suggesting malignancy include thick septa (greater than 2mm), nodular areas, and deep location. MDM2 amplification by FISH is diagnostic.Credit: O'Donnell PW et al., Sarcoma - CC-BY

CT Chest and Abdomen/Pelvis

Staging for metastatic disease:

  • CT chest: Lung metastases (most common site)
  • CT abdomen/pelvis: For retroperitoneal primaries, other metastases
  • PET-CT: For myxoid subtype (high FDG avidity), recurrent disease

Metastatic patterns:

  • Well-differentiated: Rare metastasis (less than 2%)
  • Myxoid: Lung, bone, soft tissue (10-15%)
  • Dedifferentiated: Lung, liver (15-30%)
  • Pleomorphic: Lung, liver (30-40%)

Staging complete before biopsy to optimize treatment planning.

Biopsy

Biopsy Principles for Sarcoma

Critical rules:

  • Core needle biopsy (14-16 gauge) is preferred over incisional biopsy
  • Biopsy tract must be excisable at definitive surgery (plan incision)
  • Avoid contaminating neurovascular structures or adjacent compartments
  • Request MDM2 or FUS-DDIT3 testing on biopsy specimen
  • Never perform excisional biopsy for suspected sarcoma (risks seeding, inadequate margins)

Referral to sarcoma center before biopsy is ideal for optimal outcomes.

Staging System

AJCC 8th Edition Staging (Extremity/Trunk)

StageGradeSize/Depth5-Year Survival
IALow (G1)Superficial or deep, any size90%
IBLow (G1)Deep, greater than 5cm80%
IILow (G1)Deep, greater than 10cm75%
IIIAHigh (G2-3)Superficial/deep, under 5cm60%
IIIBHigh (G2-3)Deep, 5-10cm or greater than 10cm50%
IVAnyMetastatic disease15-20%
Mnemonic

MBCPMLiposarcoma Staging Workup

M
MRI of primary
Local staging, anatomical detail, biopsy planning
B
Biopsy (core needle)
Histology and molecular testing (MDM2/FUS-DDIT3)
C
CT chest
Rule out lung metastases (most common site)
P
PET-CT if myxoid
Myxoid subtype is FDG-avid, useful for staging
M
MDT discussion
Sarcoma multidisciplinary team before treatment

Memory Hook:MBCPM = Must Be Checked Pre-Management - complete staging before surgery!

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
liposarcoma management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for liposarcomaCredit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Algorithm

Treatment Decision Matrix

Subtype/StagePrimary TreatmentAdjuvant TherapyPrognosis
Well-differentiated, extremityWide excision (1-2cm margins)None (low grade)Excellent (80-90% 5-year)
Myxoid, localizedWide excisionRadiation (radiosensitive)Good (70% 5-year)
Dedifferentiated/pleomorphicWide excisionRadiation + chemotherapyPoor (30-40% 5-year)
Retroperitoneal (any grade)Complete resection + organsRadiation (consider preop)Variable (50% 5-year)

Surgical Management

Extremity Liposarcoma Resection

Goal: Complete excision with negative margins (R0 resection)

Margin definition:

  • Negative margin: Greater than 1mm clear tissue
  • Wide margin: 1-2cm of normal tissue (goal for extremity sarcomas)
  • Marginal: Tumor capsule or pseudocapsule (inadequate)
  • Intralesional: Tumor violation (unacceptable)

Surgical Principles

Step 1Preoperative Planning
  • Review MRI with radiology and surgical team
  • Identify neurovascular structures at risk
  • Plan incision along biopsy tract (excise entire tract)
  • Mark margins on skin based on MRI
Step 2Exposure and Dissection
  • Excise biopsy tract en bloc with tumor
  • Dissect along fascial planes (preserve compartment barriers)
  • Achieve 1-2cm margin in all dimensions if feasible
  • Protect critical neurovascular structures (accept closer margins if necessary)
Step 3En Bloc Resection
  • Remove tumor with surrounding cuff of normal tissue
  • Mark specimen margins with sutures for pathologist
  • Send frozen section if margin status uncertain
  • Document neurovascular preservation
Step 4Reconstruction
  • Soft tissue coverage: Primary closure, flap, skin graft
  • Functional reconstruction: Tendon transfers if muscle resected
  • Drain placement for large dead spaces
  • Limb salvage in over 95% of extremity sarcomas

Reconstruction planning is essential before resection.

Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma Resection

Challenges:

  • Large tumor size at diagnosis (median 20cm)
  • Adjacent organ involvement common
  • Difficult to achieve negative margins
  • Higher recurrence rate (40-60%)

Surgical approach:

  • Complete resection with involved organs (kidney, colon, etc.)
  • Radical compartmental resection philosophy (remove entire compartment)
  • Accept positive margins on critical structures (IVC, aorta)
  • Consider preoperative radiotherapy for margin optimization

Outcomes:

  • R0 resection: 60% 5-year survival
  • R1 resection (microscopic positive): 40% 5-year survival
  • R2 resection (gross residual): 20% 5-year survival

Retroperitoneal sarcomas should be managed at specialized centers.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy

IndicationTimingDoseBenefit
High-grade extremity sarcomaPreoperative or postoperative50 Gy (preop) or 60-66 Gy (postop)Reduces local recurrence from 30% to 10%
Myxoid liposarcomaPostoperative (radiosensitive)50-60 GyExcellent local control, superior to other subtypes
Positive margins (R1)Postoperative66 Gy to marginImproves local control but re-excision preferred
Retroperitoneal sarcomaPreoperative (consider)50-50.4 GyControversial benefit, reduces tumor size

Myxoid Liposarcoma Radiosensitivity

Myxoid liposarcoma is uniquely radiosensitive among soft tissue sarcomas. Radiotherapy produces excellent local control and may achieve near-complete pathological response. This is attributed to FUS-DDIT3 fusion affecting DNA repair mechanisms. Radiation is standard adjuvant therapy for myxoid subtype.

Chemotherapy

Indications:

  • High-grade liposarcoma (dedifferentiated, pleomorphic, round cell myxoid)
  • Metastatic disease
  • Neoadjuvant for large/unresectable tumors

Regimens:

  • Doxorubicin + ifosfamide: Standard first-line (response rate 25-30%)
  • Trabectedin: Active in myxoid liposarcoma (response rate 50% for myxoid subtype)
  • Eribulin: Second-line option for dedifferentiated liposarcoma

Well-differentiated liposarcoma does not respond to chemotherapy.

Prognosis and Surveillance

Prognostic Factors

FactorFavorableUnfavorable
Histological subtypeWell-differentiated, myxoidDedifferentiated, pleomorphic, round cell
Tumor sizeLess than 5cmGreater than 10cm
Tumor depthSuperficialDeep (subfascial)
Margin statusNegative (R0)Positive (R1/R2)
LocationExtremityRetroperitoneum
GradeLow (G1)High (G2-3)

Surveillance Protocol

Follow-Up Schedule

Every 3-4 monthsYears 1-2
  • Clinical examination
  • MRI of primary site every 6 months
  • CT chest every 6 months (high-grade subtypes)
Every 6 monthsYears 3-5
  • Clinical examination
  • MRI primary site annually
  • CT chest annually (high-grade subtypes)
AnnuallyAfter 5 years
  • Clinical examination
  • Imaging as clinically indicated
  • Well-differentiated may recur late (10+ years)

Surveillance continues indefinitely for well-differentiated/dedifferentiated due to late recurrence risk.

Surgical Technique

Extremity Liposarcoma Excision - Step by Step

Surgical Protocol for Wide Excision

PreoperativeDay Before Surgery

Preparation:

  • Review MRI with surgical and radiology team
  • Mark tumor extent on skin with MRI guidance
  • Identify biopsy tract for en bloc excision
  • Plan incision, reconstruction, and contingency for vessels/nerves
Step 1Positioning and Exposure

Setup:

  • Position for optimal access to entire tumor
  • Tourniquet for extremity lesions (bloodless field)
  • Wide skin flaps to visualize compartment fully
  • Identify and protect major neurovascular structures
Step 2En Bloc Resection

Excision:

  • Excise biopsy tract with tumor (contaminated tissue)
  • Dissect along fascial planes with 1-2cm margins
  • Accept closer margins on critical structures (vessels, nerves, bone)
  • Frozen section if margin uncertain (intraoperative pathology)
Step 3Specimen Handling

Orientation and submission:

  • Orient specimen with sutures (superior, lateral, deep)
  • Ink margins if concerned about specific areas
  • Send to pathology fresh for molecular testing if needed
  • Document margin distances from critical structures
Step 4Reconstruction

Closure options:

  • Primary closure if tension-free
  • Local flaps or skin grafts for large defects
  • Vascular repair if sacrifice was necessary
  • Drain placement for dead space management

Limb salvage achieved in greater than 95% of extremity sarcomas.

Intraoperative Considerations

Positive Margin Management

If frozen section shows positive margin:

  • Re-excise immediately if feasible
  • Document location for postoperative radiation boost
  • Accept closer margin on vessels/nerves (radiation can cover)
  • Do NOT compromise limb function for marginal gains

Critical Structure Decisions

When approaching nerve/vessel:

  • Preserve if 1mm or more margin achievable
  • Sacrifice if tumor encases structure
  • Vascular reconstruction possible
  • Nerve sacrifice: document for rehab planning

Complications

Perioperative Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Local recurrence10% (R0) to 50% (R1)Positive margins, high grade, retroperitonealRe-excision ± radiation, MDT review
Distant metastases10-30% (high-grade)Dedifferentiated, pleomorphic, round cellSystemic chemotherapy, palliative care
Wound complications10-20%Preoperative radiation, large resectionVAC therapy, debridement, flap coverage
Nerve injury5-10%Proximity to major nerves, sacrificePhysiotherapy, tendon transfers, orthotics
DVT/PE5-10%Lower extremity surgery, prolonged immobilityProphylaxis, early mobilization, anticoagulation

Late Complications

Chronic Lymphedema

Risk factors:

  • Groin/axillary dissection
  • Postoperative radiotherapy
  • Extensive resection

Management: Compression, lymphatic massage, elevation

Radiation Fibrosis

Effects:

  • Skin changes (telangiectasia, thinning)
  • Muscle/fascia fibrosis
  • Joint stiffness
  • Secondary malignancy (rare, 1%)

Prevention: Preoperative RT has lower fibrosis than postoperative

Postoperative Care

Standard Recovery Protocol

Postoperative Management

ImmediateDay 0-2

Inpatient care:

  • Wound monitoring (flap viability, drainage)
  • DVT prophylaxis (mechanical + pharmacological)
  • Pain management (multimodal analgesia)
  • Early mobilization with physiotherapy
Early RecoveryDay 3-7

Ward care:

  • Drain management (remove when less than 30ml/24h)
  • Wound assessment (infection, dehiscence)
  • Progressive mobilization
  • Discharge planning when mobile and wound stable
OutpatientWeek 2-4

Clinic review:

  • Wound check, suture removal
  • Final histology and margin review
  • MDT discussion of adjuvant therapy
  • Radiation planning if indicated
Adjuvant TherapyMonth 1-3

If indicated:

  • Radiotherapy (50-66 Gy over 5-7 weeks)
  • Chemotherapy for high-grade (doxorubicin-based)
  • Continue physiotherapy during adjuvant treatment

Treatment completion marks start of surveillance phase.

Functional Rehabilitation

ScenarioRehabilitation FocusExpected Outcome
Standard excision (muscle sparing)ROM, strengthening, return to activityFull function 6-12 weeks
Muscle resection (single muscle)Compensatory strengthening, gait trainingGood function with adaptation
Nerve sacrifice (femoral, sciatic)Orthotics, tendon transfers, gait retrainingFunctional ambulation achievable
Post-radiation complicationsGentle ROM, lymphedema managementVariable, may require intensive therapy

Australian Context

Sarcoma Service Referral

Australian sarcoma centers:

  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (VIC)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (NSW)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (QLD)
  • Royal Perth Hospital (WA)

Referral indication: Any suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred BEFORE biopsy.

Medicare and PBS

Funding considerations:

  • MRI and CT staging: Medicare rebateable
  • MDM2/FISH testing: Available at sarcoma centers
  • Trabectedin: PBS-listed for myxoid liposarcoma
  • Radiation: Public hospital access, private options available

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation requirements:

  • Pre-biopsy imaging and staging completed
  • Biopsy performed by or in consultation with sarcoma team
  • MDT discussion documented before definitive surgery
  • Informed consent including recurrence risk, margin status, adjuvant therapy
  • Surveillance plan documented at discharge

Common litigation issues:

  • Excision of suspected lipoma without imaging/biopsy (missed liposarcoma)
  • Inadequate margins requiring re-excision
  • Failure to refer to sarcoma MDT
  • Inadequate surveillance leading to late detection of recurrence

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Liposarcoma Epidemiology and Classification

3
Dalal KM, Antonescu CR, Singer S • Annals of Surgical Oncology (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Liposarcoma accounts for 24% of all soft tissue sarcomas
  • Well-differentiated subtype most common (40-45%)
  • Extremity well-differentiated has better prognosis than retroperitoneal
  • Dedifferentiated subtype has 15-30% distant metastasis rate
Clinical Implication: Subtype and location are major prognostic determinants in liposarcoma.
Limitation: Single-center retrospective study; treatment era spans multiple decades with evolving therapy.

MDM2 Amplification in Atypical Lipomatous Tumor

2
Dei Tos AP, Doglioni C, Piccinin S, et al • American Journal of Pathology (2000)
Key Findings:
  • MDM2 amplification present in 95% of well-differentiated liposarcomas
  • Absent in benign lipomas (100% specificity)
  • FISH testing is gold standard for diagnosis
  • Enables distinction of ALT from lipoma in difficult cases
Clinical Implication: MDM2 amplification is diagnostic for well-differentiated liposarcoma and guides surgical planning.
Limitation: Early study with smaller sample size; FISH technique now standardized.

Trabectedin in Myxoid Liposarcoma

2
Grohar PJ, Grossetete-Lalami S, Molenaar JJ, et al • Journal of Clinical Oncology (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Trabectedin achieves 50% response rate in myxoid liposarcoma
  • Superior efficacy compared to other sarcoma subtypes
  • Mechanism: Targets FUS-DDIT3 fusion protein
  • Approved for advanced myxoid liposarcoma in Europe/US
Clinical Implication: Trabectedin is highly active in myxoid liposarcoma and is preferred chemotherapy for this subtype.
Limitation: Phase 2 study; head-to-head comparison with doxorubicin not performed.

Radiotherapy in Myxoid Liposarcoma

3
Chung PW, Deheshi BM, Ferguson PC, et al • International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (2009)
Key Findings:
  • Myxoid liposarcoma more radiosensitive than other sarcomas
  • Radiation achieves excellent local control (over 90%)
  • Lower radiation doses effective compared to other subtypes
  • Pathological complete response in 20% of cases
Clinical Implication: Radiation is standard adjuvant therapy for myxoid liposarcoma due to unique radiosensitivity.
Limitation: Retrospective series; optimal dose and timing not definitively established.

Margin Impact on Recurrence in Extremity Sarcoma

3
Gerrand CH, Wunder JS, Kandel RA, et al • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Positive margins increase local recurrence from 10% to 30-50%
  • Re-excision to achieve negative margins reduces recurrence
  • Margin width (under 1mm vs greater than 1mm) significant
  • Radiation can mitigate but not eliminate positive margin impact
Clinical Implication: Negative surgical margins are the most important prognostic factor for local control; re-excision mandatory if margins positive.
Limitation: Includes all sarcomas; liposarcoma-specific margin data limited.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Deep Thigh Mass - Diagnosis and Staging

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old man presents with a 10cm deep mass in his thigh that has grown over 6 months. MRI shows a predominantly fatty mass with thick septations and some solid enhancing areas. What is your differential diagnosis and initial management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is concerning for liposarcoma. The key features are: deep location, size greater than 10cm, relatively rapid growth, and MRI showing fat with thick septations and enhancement - these suggest well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma rather than benign lipoma. My approach would be: First, complete staging workup with MRI of the primary (already done), CT chest to rule out metastases, and baseline labs. Second, core needle biopsy (14-16 gauge) with request for MDM2 amplification testing to distinguish liposarcoma from lipoma and confirm subtype. Third, present the case at sarcoma MDT before definitive treatment. If liposarcoma confirmed, treatment would be wide excision aiming for 1-2cm margins. I would counsel the patient about the diagnosis, need for surgery, and potential for adjuvant radiotherapy depending on grade and margin status.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognition of red flags for liposarcoma (size, depth, growth, MRI features)
Complete staging before biopsy (MRI, CT chest)
Core needle biopsy with MDM2 testing (not excisional biopsy)
MDT discussion before treatment
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming benign lipoma based on 'predominantly fatty' appearance
✗Excisional biopsy (violates oncological principles)
✗Not ordering CT chest for staging
✗Operating without histological diagnosis and MDT input
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the significance of MDM2 amplification?"
"How would you perform the core needle biopsy?"
"What margins are needed for liposarcoma excision?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Margins and Re-excision

EXAMINER

"You excised a 12cm deep thigh mass thinking it was a lipoma. Histology returns as dedifferentiated liposarcoma with positive deep margin (tumor 1mm from fascia). The patient is 10 days post-op. How do you proceed?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a challenging situation requiring immediate action. The initial management error was excising a large deep mass without preoperative biopsy - this should always be referred to sarcoma service first. However, we must now optimize the patient's outcome. My approach: First, explain to the patient that the tumor is malignant and requires further surgery. Second, urgent re-excision is mandatory - positive margins are associated with 30-50% local recurrence. Third, re-excision should include the entire operative field (scar, drain sites) en bloc with deep margin extending to and including underlying muscle fascia. Fourth, present at sarcoma MDT to discuss adjuvant radiotherapy given high-grade dedifferentiated subtype and initial positive margin. Fifth, complete staging with CT chest if not already done. I would counsel about the importance of negative margins, need for re-operation, and role of radiotherapy. The goal is R0 resection even though this means more extensive surgery. Outcome studies show re-excision significantly improves local control.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognition that positive margins mandate re-excision
Re-excision includes entire operative field en bloc
Adjuvant radiotherapy for high-grade dedifferentiated subtype
Honest discussion with patient about initial management error
COMMON TRAPS
✗Relying on radiotherapy alone for positive margins (re-excision preferred)
✗Delayed re-excision (should be within 2-4 weeks)
✗Not excising drain sites and scar (potential seeding)
✗Inadequate re-excision depth (must include fascia/muscle)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient refuses re-excision?"
"What dose of radiotherapy would you use for positive margins?"
"What is the expected recurrence rate with observation alone?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Myxoid Liposarcoma Treatment Planning

EXAMINER

"Biopsy of a 15cm calf mass confirms myxoid liposarcoma, FUS-DDIT3 positive. CT staging shows no metastases. The tumor is close to the tibial nerve. The MDT asks for your surgical plan. What do you propose?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a large myxoid liposarcoma requiring multimodal treatment. My proposal to the MDT: First, I would recommend preoperative radiotherapy given the large size (15cm) and proximity to tibial nerve. Preoperative radiotherapy has advantages: lower total dose (50 Gy vs 60-66 Gy postop), better margin optimization, and myxoid liposarcoma is uniquely radiosensitive - we may achieve significant tumor shrinkage. Second, after radiotherapy (6-8 week wait for maximal response), proceed with wide excision aiming for negative margins. For tibial nerve, I would attempt nerve preservation if oncologically safe, but accept sacrifice if necessary for margin clearance - functional reconstruction with tendon transfers is possible. Third, postoperative surveillance with MRI and CT chest given myxoid subtype can metastasize to bone and lung. I would counsel the patient about excellent prognosis (70% 5-year survival), possible nerve sacrifice, and importance of limb salvage over amputation. Amputation should only be considered if neurovascular bundle involvement makes limb salvage impossible.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Preoperative radiotherapy for large myxoid liposarcoma (radiosensitive)
Nerve preservation attempted but margins take priority
Functional reconstruction possible if nerve sacrificed
Limb salvage achievable in over 95% of extremity sarcomas
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding with surgery first (miss opportunity for preop RT shrinkage)
✗Compromising margins to preserve nerve (margin priority)
✗Considering amputation as first-line (limb salvage standard)
✗Not recognizing unique radiosensitivity of myxoid subtype
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the advantage of preoperative over postoperative radiotherapy?"
"How would you manage if tibial nerve must be sacrificed?"
"What chemotherapy would you use if metastases develop?"

MCQ Practice Points

Histology Question

Q: What molecular marker distinguishes well-differentiated liposarcoma from benign lipoma? A: MDM2 amplification - MDM2 and CDK4 amplification detected by FISH is diagnostic for well-differentiated liposarcoma (atypical lipomatous tumor) and absent in benign lipoma. This testing is essential for any deep or large fatty tumor to guide surgical planning.

Subtype Question

Q: Which liposarcoma subtype is most radiosensitive and why? A: Myxoid liposarcoma - This subtype shows unique radiosensitivity attributed to the FUS-DDIT3 fusion protein affecting DNA repair. Radiotherapy achieves excellent local control and may produce near-complete pathological response. This is the only soft tissue sarcoma subtype where radiation is more effective than others.

Prognosis Question

Q: What is the 5-year survival for extremity well-differentiated liposarcoma after complete excision? A: 80-90% - Extremity well-differentiated liposarcoma (atypical lipomatous tumor) has excellent prognosis with wide excision achieving negative margins. Metastatic potential is less than 2%. In contrast, retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma has worse prognosis (50% 5-year survival) due to difficulty achieving negative margins and higher recurrence rate.

Treatment Question

Q: What is the most important prognostic factor for local recurrence in liposarcoma? A: Surgical margin status - Negative margins (R0 resection) are associated with 10% local recurrence. Positive margins increase recurrence to 30-50%. Re-excision to achieve negative margins significantly improves local control and is mandatory if initial margins positive.

Molecular Question

Q: What chromosomal translocation is pathognomonic for myxoid liposarcoma? A: t(12;16) producing FUS-DDIT3 fusion - This translocation is present in 95% of myxoid liposarcomas. Alternative fusion EWSR1-DDIT3 from t(12;22) occurs in 5%. Detection by RT-PCR or FISH confirms diagnosis and has therapeutic implications (radiosensitivity, trabectedin efficacy).

LIPOSARCOMA

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Epidemiology

  • •Most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults (24% of all sarcomas)
  • •Peak age 50-65 years, slight male predominance
  • •75% extremity/trunk, 25% retroperitoneum
  • •Incidence 2.5 per million per year

WHO Classification (Prognosis)

  • •Well-differentiated (40-45%) = ALT = MDM2+ = 80-90% 5-year (extremity)
  • •Myxoid (30-35%) = FUS-DDIT3 = radiosensitive = 70% 5-year
  • •Dedifferentiated (10-15%) = MDM2+ with high-grade = 30-40% 5-year
  • •Pleomorphic (5-10%) = poorest prognosis = 30% 5-year

Molecular Markers (MF Mnemonic)

  • •MDM2 for Well-differentiated/dedifferentiated (FISH gold standard)
  • •FUS-DDIT3 for Myxoid (t12;16 translocation)
  • •MDM2 negative excludes well-differentiated/dedifferentiated
  • •Round cell variant (greater than 5% round cells) worse prognosis

Staging Workup (MBCPM Mnemonic)

  • •MRI of primary = local staging and surgical planning
  • •Biopsy (core needle 14-16G) = never excisional biopsy
  • •CT chest = rule out lung metastases
  • •PET-CT if myxoid = FDG-avid subtype
  • •MDT discussion = before definitive treatment

Surgical Principles

  • •Wide excision with 1-2cm margins (R0 resection goal)
  • •Excise biopsy tract en bloc with tumor
  • •Positive margins mandate re-excision (within 2-4 weeks)
  • •Limb salvage possible in over 95% extremity sarcomas
  • •Retroperitoneal requires organ resection, accept close margins on vessels

Adjuvant Therapy

  • •Radiotherapy for high-grade or close/positive margins (reduces recurrence 30% to 10%)
  • •Myxoid subtype uniquely radiosensitive (preop RT 50 Gy)
  • •Chemotherapy: Doxorubicin + ifosfamide for high-grade
  • •Trabectedin highly active in myxoid subtype (50% response)
  • •Well-differentiated does NOT respond to chemotherapy

Prognosis and Surveillance

  • •5-year survival: Well-differentiated extremity 80-90%, myxoid 70%, dediff/pleo 30-40%
  • •Positive margins increase local recurrence from 10% to 30-50%
  • •Follow-up: Q3-4mo years 1-2, Q6mo years 3-5, annual after 5 years
  • •MRI primary site and CT chest (high-grade) per schedule
  • •Well-differentiated can recur late (10+ years) - indefinite surveillance
Quick Stats
Reading Time106 min
Related Topics

Adamantinoma

Aneurysmal Bone Cyst

Angiosarcoma

Biopsy Principles and Techniques in Orthopaedic Oncology