Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems

Comprehensive review of local antibiotic delivery methods including PMMA beads, calcium sulfate, and bioabsorbable carriers for orthopaedic infection management

complete
Updated: 2025-01-15

Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems

High Yield Overview

Comprehensive overview of the topic.

Exam Warning

High-Yield Testing Areas:

  • PMMA elution kinetics and factors affecting release
  • Heat-stable antibiotics for cement mixing
  • Calcium sulfate resorption timeline and complications
  • Evidence for prophylactic antibiotic cement in arthroplasty
  • Contraindications and complications of local delivery systems
AP pelvis X-ray showing antibiotic cement spacer in hip arthroplasty revision
Click to expand
Antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer for two-stage hip revision. AP pelvis radiograph demonstrating left hip with circular antibiotic cement spacer (radiopaque disc) in the acetabulum and retained femoral stem during interval between stages. This construct provides local antibiotic delivery (typically gentamicin/vancomycin) while maintaining joint space and allowing limited mobilization. The cement spacer releases antibiotics via biphasic elution with high initial concentrations exceeding MIC by 10-100 fold. Spacer removal and reimplantation is performed after infection eradication confirmed by inflammatory markers and repeat aspiration.Credit: Jones TJ et al., Arthroplasty Today 2018 - CC BY
Antibiotic cement spacer case for forefoot osteomyelitis showing X-rays and complications
Click to expand
Antibiotic cement spacer (ACS) in forefoot osteomyelitis management. (A) Initial X-ray demonstrating ACS placement in first ray bone defect - the radiopaque cement fills the area of resected infected bone. (B) Post first-ray amputation following spacer failure. (C) Intraoperative image after spacer removal showing purulent material in the bone defect. While ACS can provide effective local antibiotic delivery with 60% survival rate in diabetic forefoot infections, significant failure rates necessitate close monitoring and potential for definitive amputation if infection persists.Credit: Lee YH et al., J Clin Med 2022 - CC BY

At a Glance

Local antibiotic delivery systems provide targeted antimicrobial therapy achieving concentrations 10-100× MIC while minimizing systemic toxicity. PMMA bone cement (non-absorbable gold standard) exhibits biphasic elution with 80% released in 24 hours but 90-95% permanently trapped in the matrix; only heat-stable antibiotics (gentamicin, tobramycin, vancomycin) survive polymerization. Calcium sulfate (absorbable, osteoconductive) resorbs in 6-12 weeks allowing bone replacement. Hand mixing increases cement porosity and elution versus vacuum mixing. Clinical applications include gentamicin-PMMA spacers for two-stage revision arthroplasty, antibiotic beads for open fractures, and prophylactic antibiotic cement in primary TJA which reduces infection rates (Norwegian Registry evidence).

Mnemonic

GENT-VTCHeat-Stable PMMA Antibiotics

G
Gentamicin (most common, stable to 110°C)
E
Erythromycin (moderately stable)
N
No cephalosporins (heat-labile, denature)
T
Tobramycin (stable, similar to gentamicin)
V
Vancomycin (stable to 100°C)
T
Thermostable agents only survive polymerization
C
Clindamycin (moderately stable)

Memory Hook:GENT-VTC for heat-stable antibiotic cement options

Mnemonic

COLDBONECalcium Sulfate Properties

C
Cold-mixed (any antibiotic OK - no exothermic heat)
O
Osteoconductive (scaffold for bone growth)
L
Liquid drainage common (serous discharge expected)
D
Dissolves completely in 4-8 weeks
B
Bone replacement allowed (unlike PMMA)
O
Osteointegration possible with healing
N
No removal surgery needed
E
Exothermic but low temperature

Memory Hook:COLD BONE for calcium sulfate properties vs PMMA


Overview

Local antibiotic delivery systems provide targeted antimicrobial therapy directly at the site of infection or contamination, achieving drug concentrations far exceeding those possible with systemic administration while minimizing systemic toxicity. These systems are fundamental to modern management of orthopaedic infections, particularly in the context of prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis, and open fracture contamination.

The principle relies on sustained release of antibiotics from carrier materials that can be either permanent (PMMA) or absorbable (calcium sulfate, bioabsorbable polymers). Local concentrations can reach 200-1000 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of susceptible organisms, providing potent antibacterial activity even in the relatively avascular environment of infected bone and soft tissue. Understanding the pharmacokinetics, carrier properties, and clinical evidence for these systems is essential for FRACS candidates.

Historical Development

  • 1970s: Introduction of gentamicin-loaded PMMA bone cement by Buchholz
  • 1980s: Development of antibiotic-impregnated beads for osteomyelitis
  • 1990s: Calcium sulfate pellets as absorbable antibiotic carriers
  • 2000s: Bioabsorbable polymer systems and commercial products
  • Current era: Combination carriers and growth factor-loaded systems

Mechanism and Properties

Polymerization Process

PMMA bone cement undergoes exothermic polymerization reaching temperatures of 80-110°C during the liquid-powder mixing phase. This heat generation limits the antibiotics that can be incorporated, as many are denatured at temperatures greater than 60°C. The curing process creates a dense polymer matrix with antibiotics distributed throughout.

Heat-Stable Antibiotics:

  • Gentamicin (most common, stable to 110°C)
  • Tobramycin (stable, similar profile to gentamicin)
  • Vancomycin (stable to 100°C)
  • Clindamycin (moderately stable)
  • Erythromycin (moderately stable)

Heat-Labile Antibiotics (NOT suitable):

  • Cephalosporins (denature above 60°C)
  • Penicillins (unstable)
  • Fluoroquinolones (variable stability)

Elution Kinetics

PMMA exhibits a biphasic release pattern:

  1. Initial burst phase (0-24 hours): Rapid release of surface antibiotics, achieving peak local concentrations
  2. Sustained low-level release (days to weeks): Slow diffusion from deeper layers through microporosity

The majority (90-95%) of incorporated antibiotic remains permanently bound within the cement matrix and never elutes. This has implications for potential antibiotic resistance development and long-term biofilm formation on cement surfaces.

Factors Affecting Elution

Increased Antibiotic Release:

  • Higher antibiotic loading (up to 10% by weight)
  • Hand-mixed cement (more porous than vacuum-mixed)
  • Addition of glycine or glucose (increases porosity)
  • Smaller bead surface area to volume ratio
  • Lower cement viscosity

Decreased Antibiotic Release:

  • Vacuum mixing (reduces porosity)
  • High-viscosity cement formulations
  • Thick cement mantles
  • Smooth cement surfaces

Overview

Key Concepts

Purpose of Local Delivery:

  • Achieve 100-1000× higher local concentrations than systemic
  • Minimize systemic toxicity
  • Penetrate avascular infected tissue

Main Carrier Categories:

  • Non-absorbable: PMMA cement
  • Absorbable: Calcium sulfate, polymers

Local vs Systemic Delivery

ParameterLocalSystemic
Concentration100-1000× MIC2-10× MIC
ToxicityMinimalDose-limiting
PenetrationDirectVascular dependent

Exam Viva Point

Remember the 3 Principles:

  1. Local concentration exceeds MIC 10-100 fold
  2. Zone of inhibition 2-5mm from carrier
  3. 90% of PMMA antibiotic never releases

Anatomy

Tissue Considerations

Bone Structure Relevance:

  • Cortical bone: Poor penetration (avascular)
  • Cancellous bone: Better drug distribution
  • Dead space: Primary target for local delivery

Infection Microenvironment:

  • Biofilm formation on implants
  • Sequestra create avascular zones
  • pH changes reduce antibiotic efficacy

Target Tissues

LocationChallengeSolution
Dead spaceAvascularDirect carrier placement
BiofilmProtected bacteriaHigh concentration
SequestrumNo blood supplyDebride + local delivery

Exam Viva Point

Biofilm Penetration:

  • Requires 100-1000× MIC to eradicate biofilm
  • Only achievable with local delivery
  • Systemic alone insufficient

Classification

Carrier Classification

By Resorption:

  • Non-absorbable: PMMA (permanent, removal needed)
  • Absorbable: Calcium sulfate, polymers (no removal)

By Mechanism:

  • Passive diffusion: PMMA, calcium sulfate
  • Controlled release: Bioabsorbable polymers

Carrier Types

TypeExampleResorption
Non-absorbablePMMA beads/spacersPermanent
AbsorbableCalcium sulfate4-8 weeks
PolymerPLGA/collagenWeeks-months

Exam Viva Point

Key Distinction:

  • PMMA: Only releases 5-10% of antibiotic
  • Calcium sulfate: Releases 90-100%
  • This affects antibiotic loading decisions

Clinical Applications of PMMA

Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty

The most established use of antibiotic-loaded PMMA is in articulating spacers for infected total joint arthroplasty:

Standard Protocol:

  1. Stage 1: Implant removal, debridement, placement of antibiotic spacer
  2. Interval period: 6-12 weeks of spacer in situ with systemic antibiotics
  3. Stage 2: Spacer removal, reimplantation of new prosthesis

Antibiotic Loading:

  • Standard: 1-2g vancomycin + 2.4-4.8g tobramycin per 40g cement
  • High-dose: Up to 10% antibiotic by weight of cement
  • Custom loading based on organism sensitivity

Biomechanical Considerations:

  • Antibiotic loading greater than 10% significantly reduces compressive strength
  • Vancomycin more than tobramycin reduces mechanical properties
  • Static spacers require less structural integrity than articulating spacers

Prophylactic Antibiotic Cement

Use of low-dose gentamicin cement (0.5-1g per 40g) in primary arthroplasty remains controversial:

Arguments FOR:

  • Reduced infection rates in large registry data (AOANJRR)
  • Cost-effective in high-risk populations
  • Minimal mechanical property compromise at low doses

Arguments AGAINST:

  • Concern for antibiotic resistance
  • Low absolute risk reduction in low-risk patients
  • Added cost without proven benefit in cemented fixation alone

Current Recommendations (Australian context):

  • Consider in high-risk patients (diabetes, immunosuppression, revision surgery)
  • Norwegian and Australian registries show reduced infection with routine use
  • AAOS guideline: Moderate recommendation for prophylactic use

Antibiotic Beads and Chains

Beads on surgical wire provide:

  • Dead space management in osteomyelitis
  • Local antibiotic delivery at fracture sites
  • Temporary wound coverage with antibiotic elution

Technique:

  • Standard: 4-6 beads per surgical wire
  • Removal required (second procedure) at 2-4 weeks
  • Can be used with negative pressure wound therapy

PMMA vs. Absorbable Carriers

PropertyPMMA CementCalcium SulfateBioabsorbable Polymer
ResorptionNon-absorbable (permanent)4-8 weeks completeVariable (weeks to months)
Removal RequiredYes (beads/spacers)NoNo
Antibiotic Release5-10% total content90-100% total content70-95% controlled release
Release DurationDays to weeks (low level)2-6 weeksWeeks to months (programmable)
Mechanical StrengthHigh (load-bearing)Low (dead space only)Variable
OsteoconductionNoneYes (resorbs to bone)Variable
Heat LimitationYes (80-110°C)No (cold-mixed)No (cold-mixed)
CostLow to moderateModerate to highHigh
FDA ApprovalYes (multiple products)Yes (Osteoset)Limited (investigational)

Material Properties

Calcium sulfate (medical-grade plaster of Paris) has been used in orthopaedics since the 1890s for bone defect filling. Modern formulations are specifically designed for antibiotic delivery with controlled resorption rates.

Composition and Setting

  • Chemical formula: CaSO₄·½Hâ‚‚O (hemihydrate) + Hâ‚‚O → CaSO₄·2Hâ‚‚O (dihydrate)
  • Setting reaction: Exothermic but low temperature (37-42°C)
  • Setting time: 5-15 minutes depending on formulation
  • Cold-setting: Allows use of heat-labile antibiotics

Biological Properties

Advantages:

  • Osteoconductive scaffold for bone ingrowth
  • Complete resorption with replacement by host bone
  • Provides calcium and sulfate ions (potential local acidosis)
  • No second surgery for removal

Disadvantages:

  • Rapid resorption can create transient dead space
  • Wound drainage common (up to 30% of patients)
  • Local acidosis may inhibit osteogenesis
  • Limited mechanical strength (non-load-bearing only)

Resorption Timeline

The rapid resorption provides near-complete antibiotic elution but can create temporary void space before new bone formation. This is particularly relevant in load-bearing areas where mechanical support is required during healing.

Clinical Applications

Osteomyelitis Management

Calcium sulfate beads or pellets are placed into debrided osteomyelitis cavities:

Advantages:

  • Single-stage procedure (no removal needed)
  • High local antibiotic concentrations
  • Osteoconductive scaffold for bone healing
  • Any antibiotic can be incorporated (cold-mixed)

Technique:

  • Thorough surgical debridement first
  • Mix antibiotic powder directly into calcium sulfate
  • Typical loading: 1-2g antibiotic per 10cc calcium sulfate
  • Pack into dead space, avoid overpacking
  • Consider closed suction drainage

Open Fracture Management

Use in contaminated open fractures remains controversial:

Potential Benefits:

  • Local antibiotic delivery at contaminated fracture site
  • Reduced infection rates in some studies
  • Dead space management

Concerns:

  • Wound drainage complications
  • Cost
  • Limited high-quality RCT evidence
  • May interfere with fracture healing in some cases

Complications

Wound Drainage (most common):

  • Incidence: 15-30% of cases
  • Usually sterile, culture-negative
  • Management: Local wound care, rarely requires reoperation
  • Prevention: Avoid overpacking, consider drain placement

Local Inflammatory Reaction:

  • Calcium sulfate resorption creates acidic pH
  • Can cause seroma formation
  • Usually self-limiting

Hypercalcemia:

  • Rare, reported with very large volumes (greater than 100cc)
  • Usually transient and asymptomatic
  • Monitor in patients with renal impairment

Polymer Types and Mechanisms

Polylactic and Polyglycolic Acid (PLA/PGA)

These synthetic polymers undergo hydrolytic degradation:

Chemical Properties:

  • PLLA (poly-L-lactic acid): Slow degradation (12-24 months)
  • PLGA (poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid): Faster degradation (6-12 months)
  • PGA (polyglycolic acid): Rapid degradation (1-3 months)
  • Degradation to lactic and glycolic acid (metabolized via Krebs cycle)

Antibiotic Release Kinetics:

  • Programmable release rates based on polymer composition
  • Controlled degradation allows sustained therapeutic levels
  • Can achieve weeks to months of antibiotic elution
  • Release kinetics follow polymer degradation profile

Collagen-Based Carriers

Resorbable collagen sponges or fleece impregnated with antibiotics:

Commercial Products:

  • Collatamp G (gentamicin-collagen sponge)
  • Septocoll (gentamicin-collagen fleece)

Properties:

  • Rapid resorption (4-12 weeks)
  • Hemostatic properties
  • Conformable to wound beds
  • Limited mechanical strength

Chitosan and Natural Polymers

Emerging carriers from natural sources:

  • Chitosan: Derived from crustacean shells, antimicrobial properties
  • Hyaluronic acid: Viscosupplement carrier for antibiotics
  • Fibrin glue: Carrier for antibiotics in wound beds

Clinical Applications and Evidence

Current Uses

Established Applications:

  • Gentamicin-collagen sponges in spine surgery (reduced wound infection)
  • Sternal wound infection prophylaxis (cardiac surgery)
  • High-risk orthopaedic wounds

Investigational Applications:

  • Fracture fixation with antibiotic-coated implants
  • Antibiotic-loaded bone graft substitutes
  • Combined growth factor and antibiotic delivery

Limitations

Technical Challenges:

  • Manufacturing complexity and cost
  • Regulatory approval barriers (limited FDA-approved products)
  • Variable release kinetics based on local environment
  • Potential for local inflammatory response to degradation products

Clinical Barriers:

  • High cost compared to PMMA or calcium sulfate
  • Limited long-term outcome data
  • Unclear advantage over established systems in most applications

Antibiotic Characteristics

Ideal Properties for Local Delivery

Essential Characteristics:

  • Broad-spectrum activity against common orthopaedic pathogens
  • Bactericidal (not just bacteriostatic)
  • Heat-stable (if using PMMA)
  • Powder formulation available
  • Minimal local tissue toxicity
  • Low systemic absorption (minimal toxicity)

Common Antibiotic Choices

Gentamicin (most common):

  • Broad gram-negative coverage
  • Good Staphylococcus activity
  • Heat-stable to 110°C
  • Well-studied elution profile
  • Powder formulation readily available
  • Minimal local tissue toxicity

Vancomycin:

  • Excellent MRSA coverage
  • Heat-stable to 100°C
  • Often combined with gentamicin (synergistic)
  • Higher cost than gentamicin
  • Can reduce cement mechanical properties more than gentamicin

Tobramycin:

  • Similar spectrum to gentamicin
  • Slightly better Pseudomonas coverage
  • Heat-stable
  • Used in commercial antibiotic cement products

Other Agents:

  • Clindamycin: Anaerobic coverage
  • Daptomycin: MRSA, VRE (heat-labile, calcium sulfate only)
  • Rifampin: Biofilm penetration (never alone, resistance)

Aminoglycosides

Gentamicin and tobramycin are first-line choices for PMMA cement due to heat stability, broad spectrum, and extensive clinical experience. Combine with vancomycin for MRSA coverage in infected arthroplasty.

Heat-Labile Agents

Cephalosporins and penicillins denature during PMMA polymerization. They can only be used with cold-setting carriers like calcium sulfate or bioabsorbable polymers.

Combination Therapy

Dual antibiotic loading (vancomycin + aminoglycoside) provides synergistic activity and broader spectrum. Loading up to 10% total antibiotic by weight of cement is safe for mechanical properties.

Loading Dose Considerations

Prophylactic Loading (Primary Arthroplasty)

Low-dose gentamicin:

  • Standard: 0.5-1g per 40g cement packet
  • Minimal mechanical property reduction
  • Registry evidence for infection reduction
  • Cost-effective in high-risk populations

Therapeutic Loading (Infected Arthroplasty)

High-dose combinations:

  • Vancomycin 1-2g + Tobramycin 2.4-4.8g per 40g cement
  • Can go up to 10% total antibiotic by weight
  • Used in articulating spacers for two-stage revision
  • Higher doses increase elution but reduce mechanical strength

Osteomyelitis Loading (Calcium Sulfate)

Concentrated local therapy:

  • Typical: 1-2g antibiotic per 10cc calcium sulfate
  • No mechanical property concerns (non-load-bearing use)
  • Culture-specific antibiotic selection when possible
  • Can use heat-labile agents (cold-mixed)

Evidence Base

Prophylactic Antibiotic Cement in Primary TKA

Moderate
Key Findings:
  • 0.5-1% absolute risk reduction in infection at 2 years
  • Greatest benefit in revision and high-risk patients
  • No increase in antibiotic resistance detected in registry data
  • Cost-effective when infection rate exceeds 1%
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Calcium Sulfate Beads in Osteomyelitis

Moderate
Key Findings:
  • Infection control rate 84% (range 75-92%)
  • Wound drainage in 25-30% of cases (usually sterile)
  • Complete resorption by 8-12 weeks in most cases
  • Bone healing observed in 80% of cavitary defects
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge in Spine Surgery

High
Key Findings:
  • Infection rate reduction from 8.3% to 2.6% (RCT)
  • Cost-effective in high-risk populations
  • No increase in wound complications
  • Effective in instrumented multi-level fusions
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Investigations

Pre-Treatment Assessment

Microbiological:

  • Culture and sensitivity (guides antibiotic choice)
  • Tissue biopsy preferred over swab
  • Extended cultures for slow-growing organisms

Laboratory:

  • CRP and ESR (baseline, monitor response)
  • Renal function (aminoglycoside toxicity risk)
  • WBC (often normal in chronic infection)

Investigation Priorities

TestPurposeTiming
Culture/sensitivityGuide antibiotic selectionBefore antibiotics
CRP/ESRMonitor responseBaseline and serial
Renal functionAminoglycoside safetyPre-op and during treatment

Exam Viva Point

Key Point:

  • Obtain cultures BEFORE starting antibiotics
  • Tissue specimens more accurate than swabs
  • Consider sonication of removed implants

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Local Antibiotic Delivery
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Local Antibiotic DeliveryCredit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Principles

Carrier Selection Factors:

  • Need for removal vs absorbable
  • Load-bearing requirements
  • Organism sensitivity (heat-stable antibiotic available?)

Clinical Scenarios:

  • PJI: High-dose PMMA spacer (two-stage)
  • Osteomyelitis: Calcium sulfate or PMMA beads
  • Prophylaxis: Low-dose PMMA in cement

Carrier Selection

ScenarioCarrierLoading
Two-stage revisionPMMA spacerVanc + gent high-dose
OsteomyelitisCalcium sulfateCulture-specific
Primary TJAAntibiotic cementLow-dose gent

Exam Viva Point

Critical Decision:

  • MRSA: Must include vancomycin
  • Pseudomonas: Tobramycin preferred
  • Heat-labile organism-specific: Use calcium sulfate

Surgical Technique

Cement Preparation

Hand-Mixing Technique:

  • Add antibiotic powder to polymer powder
  • Mix thoroughly before adding monomer
  • Hand-mix (more porous = better elution)

Bead Fabrication:

  • Roll cement during doughy phase
  • Thread beads on surgical wire
  • Standard: 4-6 beads per string

Spacer Construction:

  • Mould around femoral component
  • Articulating spacer preferred
  • Ensure adequate antibiotic distribution

Technique Tips

StepKey PointRationale
Powder mixingBefore monomerEven distribution
Hand vs vacuumHand preferredMore porous, better elution
Bead size6-8mm diameterOptimal surface area

Exam Viva Point

Elution Enhancement:

  • Hand mixing increases porosity
  • Add glycine or dextran to increase elution
  • Maximum loading 10% by weight

Complications

PMMA-Related

Mechanical Failure:

  • Spacer fracture (5-15% with high antibiotic loading)
  • Reduced compressive strength with greater than 10% loading
  • More common with vancomycin than gentamicin

Antibiotic Resistance:

  • Theoretical concern with prophylactic cement use
  • Sub-inhibitory levels after initial burst phase
  • Registry data has not shown increased resistance to date
  • Biofilm formation on retained cement surfaces

Systemic Toxicity:

  • Rare with standard loading
  • Reported cases of acute kidney injury with high-dose spacers
  • More common with renal impairment and multiple spacers

Calcium Sulfate-Related

Wound Drainage (most common):

  • Incidence 15-30%
  • Usually sterile, culture-negative
  • Can persist for 2-4 weeks
  • Rarely requires reoperation

Inflammatory Reaction:

  • Local acidosis from calcium sulfate breakdown
  • Seroma formation
  • Usually self-limiting

Rapid Resorption:

  • Can create transient dead space
  • May require bone grafting later if healing inadequate

Polymer-Related

Foreign Body Reaction:

  • Inflammatory response to degradation products
  • Sterile seroma or abscess formation
  • More common with rapid-degrading polymers (PGA)

Unpredictable Release:

  • Variable kinetics based on local pH, vascularity
  • Acidic degradation products may affect release rate

Renal Impairment: High-dose antibiotic spacers (particularly aminoglycosides) can cause systemic absorption and nephrotoxicity in patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction. Monitor renal function and antibiotic levels in high-risk patients with spacers in situ.

Contraindications

Absolute Contraindications

PMMA Beads/Spacers:

  • Known allergy to antibiotic being loaded
  • Inadequate soft tissue coverage (exposed cement)
  • Severe renal impairment with high-dose aminoglycoside loading

Calcium Sulfate:

  • Known hypersensitivity to calcium sulfate
  • Areas requiring immediate structural support (load-bearing)
  • Severe renal impairment (risk of hypercalcemia with large volumes)

Relative Contraindications

PMMA:

  • Organism resistant to available heat-stable antibiotics
  • Need for MRI imaging (metal beads on wire)
  • Patient unable to tolerate second surgery for removal

Calcium Sulfate:

  • High-risk wounds (poor soft tissue coverage, questionable healing)
  • Large cavitary defects requiring structural support
  • Concern for prolonged wound drainage (cosmetic areas)

Bioabsorbable Polymers:

  • Cost constraints (limited insurance coverage)
  • Uncertain local environment (ischemic tissue, poor vascularity)

Postoperative Care

Monitoring

PMMA Spacer/Beads:

  • Serial inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR)
  • Wound inspection (drainage, healing)
  • Renal function if aminoglycosides used
  • Plan for bead removal at 2-4 weeks

Calcium Sulfate:

  • Expect wound drainage (15-30%)
  • Usually sterile, self-limiting
  • Monitor for hypercalcemia (rare)

Postoperative Monitoring

ParameterFrequencyConcern
CRPWeeklyShould decrease
WoundDailyDrainage, healing
CreatinineWeekly if aminoglycosideNephrotoxicity

Exam Viva Point

Calcium Sulfate Drainage:

  • Drainage in 30% of cases
  • Usually sterile (culture negative)
  • Manage conservatively
  • Rarely needs reoperation

Outcomes

Success Rates

Two-Stage Revision:

  • Infection eradication: 85-95%
  • Functional success: 70-80%
  • Reinfection rate: 5-15%

Osteomyelitis:

  • Calcium sulfate: 75-90% eradication
  • PMMA beads: 80-90% eradication
  • Comparable outcomes, but calcium sulfate avoids removal surgery

Outcome Summary

IndicationSuccess RateNotes
PJI two-stage85-95%Gold standard
Osteomyelitis75-90%Debridement critical
Prophylaxis (primary TJA)0.5-1% ARRRegistry data

Exam Viva Point

Factors for Success:

  • Adequate debridement (most important)
  • Appropriate antibiotic selection
  • Sufficient local concentration
  • Concurrent systemic antibiotics

Evidence Base

Key Studies

Buchholz (1970s):

  • Introduced gentamicin-loaded PMMA cement
  • Reduced infection in revision arthroplasty

AOANJRR Registry:

  • Prophylactic antibiotic cement reduces PJI in primary TJA
  • Most significant in high-risk patients

McKee et al (2002):

  • Calcium sulfate beads: 84% infection control in osteomyelitis
  • Wound drainage in 25-30%

Evidence Summary

StudyFindingLevel
AOANJRRAntibiotic cement reduces PJILevel 2
McKee 2002CaSO4 84% successLevel 3
Godil 2013Gent-collagen reduces SSILevel 1

Exam Viva Point

Evidence Limitations:

  • Mostly observational/registry data
  • Few RCTs for antibiotic cement
  • Heterogeneous patient populations
  • Variable follow-up periods

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old woman with diabetes presents 14 months after primary total knee arthroplasty with chronic sinus drainage and pain. Aspiration grows MRSA. You plan a two-stage revision. Discuss your antibiotic spacer strategy."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would use a high-dose antibiotic-loaded articulating spacer with vancomycin 2g plus tobramycin 3.6g per 40g cement batch. MRSA requires vancomycin coverage, and the aminoglycoside provides synergistic activity and gram-negative coverage. This loading is within the safe range (less than 10% by weight) to maintain adequate mechanical properties for an articulating spacer. I would use hand-mixed or commercial spacer cement to maximize porosity and antibiotic elution.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
MRSA requires vancomycin coverage (heat-stable, effective in PMMA)
Dual antibiotic loading provides synergistic effect and broader spectrum
High-dose loading (up to 10% by weight) appropriate for therapeutic spacers
Articulating spacer requires adequate mechanical properties
Hand-mixing increases porosity and antibiotic release compared to vacuum mixing
COMMON TRAPS
✗Don't use cephalosporins or penicillins (heat-labile, denature during PMMA polymerization)
✗Don't exceed 10% total antibiotic by weight (significant mechanical property reduction)
✗Don't forget to mention organism-specific therapy (vancomycin for MRSA)
✗Don't use static spacer if patient needs mobility during interim period
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

EXAMINER

"You are managing chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia following an open fracture. After debridement, you have a 50cc bone defect. The organism is pan-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Discuss local antibiotic delivery options."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Both are viable options, but I would favor calcium sulfate beads for this case. PMMA beads would require a second surgery for removal in 4-6 weeks, while calcium sulfate completely resorbs in 6-8 weeks and provides an osteoconductive scaffold for bone healing. With calcium sulfate, I can load organism-specific antibiotics (such as cefazolin or flucloxacillin) that are heat-labile and cannot be used with PMMA. The main disadvantage is wound drainage in up to 30% of cases, which I would discuss with the patient. I would load approximately 5g of antibiotic (based on sensitivity) into 50cc of calcium sulfate, place it into the debrided cavity, and ensure adequate soft tissue coverage. A closed suction drain may help manage expected wound drainage.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Calcium sulfate avoids second surgery for removal (advantage over PMMA)
Osteoconductive properties support bone regeneration
Cold-mixing allows use of heat-labile antibiotics (cephalosporins, penicillins)
Higher total antibiotic release (90-100% vs 5-10% for PMMA)
Wound drainage is common but usually sterile and self-limiting
COMMON TRAPS
✗Don't forget to mention wound drainage as expected complication (prepare patient)
✗Don't use in load-bearing areas (calcium sulfate has poor mechanical strength)
✗Don't overpack (can worsen wound drainage and local inflammation)
✗Don't forget systemic antibiotics are still required (local delivery is adjunct)

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the most commonly used antibiotic in PMMA bone cement for arthroplasty infection prophylaxis?

A: Gentamicin (tobramycin in some regions). Commercial antibiotic-loaded cements contain 0.5-1g gentamicin per 40g cement. This provides local concentrations 100-1000x higher than MIC for staphylococci while maintaining low systemic levels. For treatment of established infection, higher doses (3-4g per 40g cement) are hand-mixed. Vancomycin 1-2g is added for MRSA coverage.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the advantages of local antibiotic delivery compared to systemic administration?

A: (1) Local concentrations 100-1000x higher than achievable systemically, (2) Minimal systemic absorption and toxicity, (3) Effective in avascular areas where systemic antibiotics cannot penetrate, (4) Sustained release over weeks. Limitations: only heat-stable antibiotics survive cement polymerization (gentamicin, vancomycin, tobramycin - NOT beta-lactams), requires surgical placement.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the recommended antibiotic-loaded cement spacer regimen for a two-stage revision of an infected total knee arthroplasty?

A: High-dose antibiotic cement: vancomycin 3-4g + gentamicin 3-4g per 40g PMMA cement. Articulating spacer preferred over static spacer (maintains soft tissue tension, easier revision). Cement spacer remains in situ for 6-12 weeks while systemic antibiotics administered. Consider antibiotic holiday (2-6 weeks) before reimplantation to confirm infection clearance.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the properties of an ideal local antibiotic delivery system?

A: (1) Heat-stable (survives cement polymerization at 70-100°C), (2) Water-soluble (for elution from cement), (3) Broad-spectrum coverage, (4) Bactericidal, (5) Low allergenicity, (6) Minimal systemic absorption, (7) Prolonged elution kinetics. Gentamicin, tobramycin, and vancomycin meet these criteria. Beta-lactams are heat-labile and not suitable.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the role of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads in osteomyelitis management?

A: Biodegradable alternative to PMMA beads that does not require removal surgery. Calcium sulfate resorbs over 4-12 weeks, releasing antibiotics and being replaced by bone. Can deliver vancomycin, gentamicin, or tobramycin. Useful for: dead space management, osteomyelitis debridement, open fracture void filling. Complication: transient hypercalcemia, prolonged wound drainage during resorption.

Australian Context

Practice in Australia

AOANJRR Evidence:

  • Supports prophylactic antibiotic cement in TJA
  • Reduced revision for infection in registry data
  • Most benefit in cemented TKA

Available Products:

  • Palacos R+G (gentamicin)
  • Simplex with Tobramycin
  • Calcium sulfate: Osteoset, Stimulan

PBS Considerations:

  • Vancomycin and gentamicin on PBS
  • Hospital supply for cement mixing
  • Cost-effectiveness in high-risk patients

Common Products

ProductTypeAntibiotic
Palacos R+GPMMAGentamicin 0.5g
Simplex PPMMATobramycin 1g
StimulanCaSO4Any antibiotic

Exam Viva Point

Australian Practice:

  • AOANJRR registry supports antibiotic cement
  • eTG recommends flucloxacillin + gentamicin for MSSA
  • Consider vancomycin for MRSA (eTG guidance)
  • Monitor aminoglycoside levels in renal impairment

High-Yield Exam Summary

PMMA Antibiotic Cement

    Calcium Sulfate Carriers

      Bioabsorbable Polymers

        Evidence-Based Practice

          Complications to Mention

            Exam Pearl

            Examiner Favorite: "What factors increase antibiotic elution from PMMA cement?" Answer systematically: Higher antibiotic loading, hand-mixing (vs vacuum), additives like glycine, smaller bead size (higher surface area), and lower cement viscosity. Then contrast with calcium sulfate which releases 90-100% regardless of these factors due to complete resorption.


            Cross-References

            Related Basic Science Topics:

            • PMMA Bone Cement (polymerization, mechanical properties, thermal effects)
            • Calcium Phosphate Cements (alternative osteoconductive carriers)
            • Bioabsorbable Materials (polymer degradation kinetics, tissue response)
            • Common Pathogens in Orthopaedics (organism-specific antibiotic selection)
            • Osteomyelitis Pathophysiology (infection biology, antibiotic penetration)

            Related Clinical Topics:

            • Periprosthetic Joint Infection (two-stage revision, spacer technique)
            • Pediatric Acute Osteomyelitis (dead space management, antibiotic delivery)
            • Open Fracture Management (local antibiotic prophylaxis)
            • Surgical Site Infection Prevention (prophylactic antibiotic strategies)

            Related Surgical Topics:

            • Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty (spacer fabrication and implantation)
            • Debridement Techniques for Osteomyelitis (preparation for antibiotic bead placement)

            This comprehensive understanding of local antibiotic delivery systems is essential for managing orthopaedic infections and is frequently tested in FRACS examinations across multiple stations.

            Quick Stats
            Reading Time97 min
            Related Topics

            Articular Cartilage Structure and Function

            Bending Moment Distribution in Fracture Fixation

            Biceps Femoris Short Head Anatomy

            Biofilm Formation in Orthopaedic Infections