Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Maisonneuve Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Maisonneuve Fractures

Comprehensive guide to Maisonneuve fractures - proximal fibula fracture with syndesmotic disruption, deltoid ligament injury, recognition and surgical management for orthopaedic exam

complete
Updated: 2024-12-18
High Yield Overview

MAISONNEUVE FRACTURES - THE MISSED INJURY

Proximal Fibula | Syndesmotic Disruption | Deltoid Injury | Unstable Ankle

5%Of all ankle fractures
100%Syndesmotic disruption
Weber CEquivalent injury pattern
4.5mmDiastasis threshold for surgery

KEY INJURY COMPONENTS

Proximal Fibula
PatternFracture in proximal third
TreatmentDoes NOT need fixation
Syndesmosis
PatternComplete disruption
TreatmentSyndesmotic fixation essential
Deltoid/Medial Malleolus
PatternMedial injury required
TreatmentFix medial malleolus, explore deltoid if open

Critical Must-Knows

  • Proximal fibula fracture = must assess entire syndesmosis (membrane torn)
  • Syndesmotic fixation is mandatory - unstable ankle mortise
  • Weber C equivalent - proximal to syndesmosis
  • Do NOT fix the fibula - it is proximal and stable, syndesmosis is the issue
  • Always check full leg films if medial ankle injury with no lateral malleolus fracture

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    If medial malleolus fracture or deltoid tenderness with no fibula fracture seen - get full leg films
  • "
    Syndesmosis must be fixed, fibula fracture does not need surgery
  • "
    External rotation mechanism with forced pronation creates the pattern
  • "
    Cotton test under fluoroscopy confirms syndesmotic instability

Critical Maisonneuve Exam Points

The Missed Diagnosis

Classic exam scenario: patient with isolated medial malleolus fracture or medial tenderness. Examiner asks about further imaging. Answer: full-length tibia/fibula to exclude Maisonneuve. This injury is easily missed if you only X-ray the ankle.

Syndesmotic Fixation

The fibula does NOT need fixation - it is proximal and the bone heals well. The problem is the complete syndesmotic disruption. Must fix with syndesmotic screws or suture button across tibiofibular joint.

Medial Side Injury

Medial injury is mandatory for ankle instability. Either medial malleolus fracture or deltoid ligament rupture. If deltoid torn, MRI may show but clinical exam (medial tenderness, stress views) usually sufficient.

Stability Assessment

Stress testing essential. Cotton test (lateral translation under fluoro) and external rotation stress test. Greater than 4-5mm diastasis or any lateral translation = unstable syndesmosis.

Quick Decision Guide - Maisonneuve Management

ComponentAssessmentTreatment
Proximal fibula fractureUsually stable, no displacementNO SURGERY - heals with rest
SyndesmosisAlways completely disruptedSYNDESMOTIC FIXATION (screws or suture button)
Medial malleolusIf fractured - assess displacementORIF if displaced
Deltoid ligamentIf intact medial malleolus - deltoid tornMay heal with syndesmotic stabilization, or direct repair if open
Mortise congruityPost-reduction films criticalMust be anatomic - any talar shift unacceptable
Mnemonic

MAISON - Maisonneuve Key Points

M
Medial injury (malleolus or deltoid)
Always present - check medial side
A
Above ankle fibula fracture
Proximal third of fibula
I
Interosseous membrane torn
Complete syndesmotic disruption
S
Syndesmotic fixation needed
Main surgical priority
O
Omit fibula fixation
Fibula heals without surgery
N
Not stable - must operate
Unstable ankle mortise

Memory Hook:MAISON (French for house) - the injury is named after French surgeon Jules Maisonneuve

Mnemonic

SYNDESMOSIS - Fixation Principles

S
Screws or suture button
Two common fixation methods
Y
Your position: supine with bump
Patient positioning for surgery
N
Neutral or slight dorsiflexion
Foot position during fixation
D
Direct reduction of fibula
Reduce fibula in incisura
E
Engage both cortices
Tricortical or quadricortical
S
Stress test after fixation
Confirm stability achieved
M
Multiple screws if severe
Consider 2 screws if very unstable
O
Often remove screws
If using screws, often remove at 3-4 months
S
Suture button - no removal needed
Alternative to screws
I
Intact mortise on final films
Confirm mortise reduction
S
Six weeks non-weightbearing
Standard postoperative protocol

Memory Hook:SYNDESMOSIS guides your surgical fixation approach

Mnemonic

FIBULA - Why NOT to Fix Proximal Fracture

F
Far from ankle joint
Proximal location, not intra-articular
I
Interosseous membrane is issue
Membrane disruption is the problem
B
Bone heals well
Proximal fibula has good blood supply
U
Unnecessary surgery
Adding morbidity without benefit
L
Low complication risk if left
Nonunion rare at this level
A
Ankle syndesmosis is priority
Fix syndesmosis, not fibula

Memory Hook:FIBULA reminds you the fibula fracture itself doesn't need fixation

Mnemonic

COTTON - Syndesmotic Stress Test

C
Cotton test under fluoro
Dynamic test for syndesmotic stability
O
Outward force on talus
Apply lateral translation stress
T
Translation of fibula
Look for widening of syndesmosis
T
Three to five mm threshold
Greater than 4.5mm = unstable
O
Obvious widening = surgery
Clear instability mandates fixation
N
Normal is no translation
Stable syndesmosis has no movement

Memory Hook:COTTON test (after Frederick Cotton) confirms syndesmotic instability

Overview and Epidemiology

Maisonneuve fracture is a fracture of the proximal third of the fibula associated with disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and injury to the medial ankle structures (medial malleolus fracture or deltoid ligament rupture).

Named after: Jules Germain François Maisonneuve (1809-1897), French surgeon who described this injury pattern in 1840.

Key concept: The energy of the external rotation injury is transmitted through the interosseous membrane, causing the fibula to fracture proximally rather than at the ankle level. This creates a Weber C equivalent injury with complete syndesmotic disruption.

Epidemiology:

  • 5% of all ankle fractures
  • Often missed initially (up to 20% in some series)
  • Peak incidence 20-50 years
  • Equal male-female distribution
  • Associated with sports injuries and falls

The Missed Maisonneuve

The classic exam scenario presents a patient with an isolated medial malleolus fracture or medial ankle tenderness without fibula fracture. You MUST order full-length tibia/fibula films to exclude Maisonneuve fracture. Missing this diagnosis leads to chronic ankle instability.

Clinical significance:

  • Represents complete syndesmotic disruption
  • Ankle mortise is unstable
  • Requires surgical stabilization
  • The proximal fibula fracture itself does NOT require fixation

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis:

The syndesmosis is a complex of ligaments that stabilize the distal tibiofibular joint:

  1. Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL)

    • Runs obliquely from anterolateral tibia to anterior fibula
    • First structure injured in external rotation
    • Prevents anterior fibular translation
  2. Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL)

    • Strongest syndesmotic ligament
    • Runs from posterolateral tibia to posterior fibula
    • Includes the posterior malleolus component
  3. Interosseous ligament

    • Thickened distal portion of interosseous membrane
    • Primary restraint to syndesmotic widening
    • Disrupted along entire length in Maisonneuve
  4. Transverse tibiofibular ligament

    • Deep component of PITFL
    • Inferior continuation of posterior ligament

Interosseous membrane:

  • Connects tibia and fibula along their entire length
  • Transfers load from tibia to fibula (10-15% of axial load)
  • In Maisonneuve, membrane torn from ankle to level of fibula fracture
  • Allows proximal migration of injury energy

Complete Syndesmotic Disruption

In Maisonneuve fracture, the interosseous membrane is torn from the ankle to the level of the fibula fracture. This represents complete syndesmotic disruption - the most severe form of syndesmotic injury.

Medial structures:

For ankle instability, medial injury is required:

Medial InjuryCharacteristicsTreatment
Medial malleolus fractureVisible on X-ray, transverse patternORIF if displaced
Deltoid ligament ruptureTenderness, no fracture visibleMay not need repair if syndesmosis stabilized

Mechanism of injury:

Stage 1: External Rotation

Foot is planted, body rotates externally. This is the same mechanism as Weber C fractures. The talus rotates externally in the mortise.

Stage 2: AITFL Rupture

The anterior syndesmotic ligament tears first. This allows lateral shift of fibula.

Stage 3: Membrane Propagation

Instead of fibula fracturing at ankle level, the energy propagates up through the interosseous membrane. The membrane tears sequentially.

Stage 4: Proximal Fibula Fracture

The membrane injury stops when fibula fractures proximally. Fracture usually at junction of proximal and middle thirds.

Stage 5: Medial Injury

For the ankle to dislocate/sublux, medial structures must fail. Either medial malleolus fractures or deltoid ligament ruptures.

Why Proximal?

The fibula fractures proximally because the interosseous membrane is more easily torn than the fibula. The energy travels up the leg through membrane disruption until it finds a weak point in the bone - typically the proximal third where the fibula is thinnest.

Classification Systems

Weber Classification Context

Maisonneuve fractures are classified as Weber C equivalent:

Weber TypeFibula Fracture LevelSyndesmotic Injury
Type ABelow syndesmosisIntact
Type BAt syndesmosis levelPartial/Variable
Type CAbove syndesmosisComplete disruption
MaisonneuveProximal third (far above)Complete disruption

The key point is that Maisonneuve fractures have the same syndesmotic implications as Weber C - complete disruption requiring fixation.

Weber C Equivalent

Although the fibula fracture is very proximal, Maisonneuve is treated as a Weber C equivalent because syndesmotic disruption is complete. The treatment is syndesmotic fixation, not fibula fixation.

Lauge-Hansen Classification

Maisonneuve represents the Pronation-External Rotation (PER) mechanism:

StageStructure InjuredMaisonneuve Equivalent
PER-1Medial malleolus or deltoidMedial injury component
PER-2AITFLAnterior syndesmosis torn
PER-3Interosseous membraneMembrane torn to proximal level
PER-4Fibula fracture (or PITFL)Proximal fibula fracture

The Maisonneuve pattern represents PER Stage 4 with propagation through the entire interosseous membrane.

The pronation component (foot everted) combined with external rotation creates maximum stress on the medial structures first, then the injury spirals around to the lateral side.

Classification by Medial Injury:

Medial InjuryFrequencyImplications
Medial malleolus fracture60-70%Visible on X-ray, ORIF if displaced
Deltoid ligament rupture30-40%Not visible on X-ray, clinical diagnosis
BothRareComplete medial disruption

The medial injury pattern affects surgical planning. Medial malleolus fracture usually requires ORIF through separate incision. Deltoid rupture may not need repair if syndesmosis stabilized. Some surgeons explore deltoid through medial approach if clinically indicated.

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History:

  • Mechanism: fall, twisting injury, sports injury
  • External rotation force on planted foot
  • May describe "pop" or "snap" at time of injury
  • Pain at ankle AND may have calf/proximal leg pain
  • Unable to weight bear

Physical examination:

Clinical Examination Findings

LocationFindingSignificance
Medial ankleTenderness over medial malleolus or deltoidConfirms medial injury - essential component
Lateral ankleMay have minimal tendernessNo fibula fracture at ankle level
Proximal fibulaTenderness at fibula head/neckKey clinical finding - palpate entire fibula!
Interosseous membraneTenderness along length of legIndicates membrane disruption
Ankle swellingMarked swelling and ecchymosisEnergy of injury
Squeeze testPain at ankle with calf squeezePositive indicates syndesmotic injury

Always Palpate Proximal Fibula

In ANY patient with medial ankle injury without lateral malleolus fracture, you MUST palpate the entire fibula from ankle to knee. Tenderness at proximal fibula = Maisonneuve fracture until proven otherwise.

Special tests:

  1. Squeeze test (Hopkinson test)

    • Compress tibia and fibula at mid-calf level
    • Positive: pain at ankle (indicates syndesmotic injury)
    • Highly sensitive but not specific
  2. External rotation stress test

    • Stabilize tibia, externally rotate foot
    • Pain at syndesmosis = positive
    • May show widening on stress fluoroscopy
  3. Cotton test (under fluoroscopy)

    • Apply lateral translation force to talus
    • Positive: visible lateral shift of fibula from tibia
    • Definitive test for syndesmotic instability

Clinical suspicion algorithm:

  1. Isolated medial malleolus fracture seen on ankle films
  2. OR medial tenderness without lateral fracture
  3. → Palpate proximal fibula
  4. → If tender, order full-length tibia/fibula films
  5. → If proximal fibula fracture seen = Maisonneuve fracture

Investigations

Imaging is essential for:

  • Confirming Maisonneuve pattern
  • Assessing medial malleolus fracture
  • Evaluating syndesmotic widening
  • Surgical planning

Ankle series (AP, lateral, mortise):

ViewKey Findings
AP ankleMedial malleolus fracture, clear space widening
Mortise viewTibiofibular overlap (normally greater than 1mm), clear space (normally under 4mm)
Lateral anklePosterior malleolus involvement, talar subluxation

Full-length tibia/fibula films:

Essential for diagnosis! Shows:

  • Proximal fibula fracture (usually spiral pattern)
  • Location of fracture (typically junction of proximal and middle thirds)
  • Extent of interosseous membrane disruption inferred

Radiographic Red Flags

Order full-length films if: (1) Isolated medial malleolus fracture, (2) Tibiofibular clear space widened greater than 5mm, (3) Tibiofibular overlap under 1mm on mortise view, (4) Medial clear space greater than 4mm.

Radiographic parameters for syndesmotic injury: Tibiofibular clear space greater than 5mm (AP view), tibiofibular overlap less than 1mm (mortise view), and medial clear space greater than 4mm (mortise view).

Ankle radiograph series showing syndesmotic widening in Maisonneuve fracture
Click to expand
Ankle radiograph series through a plaster cast demonstrating the classic syndesmotic findings in Maisonneuve fracture: (Left) AP view showing widening of the tibiotalar joint, (Middle) lateral view showing ankle mortise, (Right) mortise view demonstrating clear widening of the medial clear space and tibiofibular diastasis. These ankle-level findings - particularly the widened medial clear space without visible lateral malleolus fracture - should prompt full-length tibia/fibula radiographs to exclude proximal fibula fracture.Credit: Stauch CS et al., MedPix - CC BY 4.0
Maisonneuve fracture radiographs showing proximal fibula fracture and ankle syndesmotic injury
Click to expand
Classic Maisonneuve fracture pattern: (A) AP tibia/fibula radiograph demonstrating minimally displaced spiral fracture of the proximal fibular shaft (arrow). (B) AP ankle radiograph in the same patient showing soft tissue swelling and syndesmotic widening (arrow). Note the medial clear space widening indicating complete syndesmotic disruption - this combination mandates full-length tibia/fibula films whenever isolated medial ankle injury is identified.Credit: Wong PK et al., Int J Emerg Med - CC BY 4.0
Full-length tibiofibular radiograph showing proximal spiral fibula fracture in Maisonneuve injury
Click to expand
Full-length AP radiograph of the right lower leg demonstrating the classic spiral fracture pattern in the proximal third of the fibular diaphysis. The full-length view is essential for diagnosis - this fracture would be missed on standard ankle radiographs alone. The spiral fracture morphology reflects the external rotation mechanism that propagates through the interosseous membrane.Credit: Stauch CS et al., MedPix - CC BY 4.0
Lateral radiograph showing proximal fibula spiral fracture in Maisonneuve injury
Click to expand
Lateral radiograph of the right lower leg (same patient as AP view) demonstrating the spiral fracture of the proximal fibular diaphysis. The lateral view is helpful for assessing fracture displacement and confirming the spiral pattern characteristic of the external rotation injury mechanism. Note the patient is immobilized in a plaster cast. This proximal fibula fracture does NOT require surgical fixation - treatment focuses on syndesmotic stabilization at the ankle level.Credit: Stauch CS et al., MedPix - CC BY 4.0

CT indications:

  • Assess posterior malleolus involvement (size, fragment pattern)
  • Complex fracture patterns
  • Subtle syndesmotic widening on plain films
  • Post-reduction assessment of mortise congruity

CT findings:

  • Can measure tibiofibular distance precisely
  • Shows fibular rotation (malreduction)
  • Identifies osteochondral lesions of talus (associated injury)

CT is often obtained but may not change management if plain films clearly show Maisonneuve pattern with widened syndesmosis.

MRI indications:

  • Confirm deltoid ligament rupture (if equivocal clinically)
  • Assess syndesmotic ligaments in detail
  • Rule out occult injury patterns
  • Research purposes (mapping injury extent)

MRI not routinely needed - clinical and plain film diagnosis usually sufficient. MRI may be useful if:

  • Medial malleolus intact but questioning deltoid injury
  • Planning deltoid ligament repair
  • Medicolegal documentation

MRI adds cost and rarely changes surgical plan if syndesmotic instability is confirmed clinically/radiographically.

Intraoperative stress testing:

Before and after fixation to confirm stability:

Cotton test (external rotation stress):

  • Apply lateral translation to talus under fluoro
  • Positive: greater than 3-4mm lateral shift compared to contralateral side
  • Repeat after syndesmotic fixation to confirm stability

Gravity stress test:

  • Lateral view with stress applied by gravity
  • Assess talar tilt and anterior drawer

Stress testing under anesthesia is more reliable than awake examination due to patient guarding.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
maisonneuve fractures management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for maisonneuve fracturesCredit: OrthoVellum

Key principles:

  1. The fibula fracture does NOT need fixation

    • Proximal fibula heals well without surgery
    • No mechanical advantage to fixing it
    • Would require additional proximal incision with peroneal nerve risk
  2. Syndesmotic fixation is mandatory

    • Complete disruption = unstable ankle mortise
    • Without fixation, chronic instability and arthritis develop
    • Syndesmotic screws or suture button
  3. Medial malleolus fixation if displaced

    • Standard ORIF with screws/plate
    • Separate medial incision
  4. Deltoid ligament may not need repair

    • If syndesmosis stabilized and mortise congruent
    • Some surgeons explore and repair
    • Evidence unclear on benefit of routine repair

Do NOT Fix the Fibula

The proximal fibula fracture is NOT fixed surgically. It heals without intervention. Attempting to fix it risks peroneal nerve injury and adds no benefit. The problem is the syndesmosis, not the fibula.

Nonoperative management is NOT appropriate for Maisonneuve fractures.

The complete syndesmotic disruption creates an unstable ankle mortise. Without fixation:

  • Chronic lateral talar shift
  • Post-traumatic arthritis
  • Chronic instability
  • Poor functional outcomes

The only exception would be a non-ambulatory patient or severe medical comorbidities precluding surgery - this is rare.

All patients with Maisonneuve fracture should be counseled for surgical stabilization of the syndesmosis.

Surgical goals:

  1. Restore anatomic ankle mortise
  2. Stabilize distal tibiofibular syndesmosis
  3. Fix medial malleolus if fractured and displaced
  4. Allow healing of interosseous membrane

Surgical timing:

  • Ideally within 1-2 weeks of injury
  • May need to stage if severe swelling (wrinkle test)
  • Delay increases difficulty due to early callus/scarring

Fixation options for syndesmosis:

MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages
Syndesmotic screwsWell-established, strong fixationMay need removal at 3-4 months
Suture buttonDynamic fixation, no removal neededHigher cost, learning curve

Most surgeons use syndesmotic screws (1-2 screws) or suture button devices. Both produce good outcomes when properly positioned.

Surgical Technique

Patient positioning:

  • Supine on radiolucent table
  • Bump under ipsilateral hip (10-15 degree internal rotation of leg)
  • Tourniquet on thigh (optional)
  • Fluoroscopy accessible for AP, lateral, and mortise views

Equipment:

  • Standard fracture set
  • Reduction clamps
  • 3.5mm or 4.5mm cortical screws for syndesmosis
  • OR suture button device (TightRope, etc.)
  • Small fragment set if medial malleolus ORIF needed

Incisions: Lateral approach over distal fibula for syndesmotic fixation. Medial approach if medial malleolus ORIF required. The proximal fibula is NOT approached surgically.

Reduction technique:

Step 1: Expose Distal Fibula

Make lateral incision over distal fibula. Identify syndesmosis and fibular notch (incisura fibularis) of tibia. Clean out hematoma and debris.

Step 2: Reduce Fibula

The fibula must be anatomically reduced into the incisura. Use pointed reduction clamp from posterolateral fibula to anteromedial tibia. Confirm reduction under fluoro on mortise and lateral views.

Step 3: Position Foot

Ensure foot is in neutral dorsiflexion or slight dorsiflexion. Fixing in plantarflexion will limit dorsiflexion postoperatively (talus widest anteriorly).

Step 4: Confirm Reduction

Check tibiofibular overlap (greater than 1mm on mortise), clear space (under 5mm on AP), and medial clear space (under 4mm). Compare to contralateral ankle films if available.

Avoid Malreduction

Syndesmotic malreduction is common and leads to poor outcomes. The fibula must sit correctly in the incisura - not externally rotated or posteriorly translated. Use direct visualization and multiple fluoroscopic views.

Screw fixation technique:

  1. Position

    • Insert 2cm proximal to ankle joint
    • Aim 25-30 degrees anterior to coronal plane (parallels syndesmosis)
    • Perpendicular to long axis of tibia
  2. Drill and insert

    • 3.5mm or 4.5mm cortical screw
    • Tricortical (lateral fibular cortex, medial fibular cortex, lateral tibial cortex) OR
    • Quadricortical (through medial tibial cortex as well)
    • Tricortical generally sufficient, quadricortical may be stronger
  3. Number of screws

    • Single screw usually adequate
    • Consider 2 screws if very unstable or large patient
    • Second screw placed 1-2cm proximal to first
  4. Confirm fixation

    • Repeat Cotton test under fluoro - should be stable
    • Check all views for maintained reduction

Suture button technique:

  • Similar positioning as screws
  • Drill hole through 4 cortices
  • Pass suture device and tension appropriately
  • Advantage: no removal surgery needed

Tricortical vs Quadricortical

Tricortical screws (engaging 3 cortices) are generally sufficient. Quadricortical screws are stronger but may be more likely to break and are not clearly superior in outcomes. Surgeon preference guides choice.

If medial malleolus fractured and displaced:

Approach:

  • Medial longitudinal incision over medial malleolus
  • Protect saphenous nerve and vein
  • Expose fracture and joint

Fixation options:

  • Two partially threaded cancellous screws (4.0mm)
  • Lag technique with washer
  • Antiglide plate if large fragment
  • Tension band wire if small fragment

Key points:

  • Anatomic reduction of articular surface
  • Must not leave medial joint incongruity
  • Check mortise view for symmetric medial clear space

If medial malleolus intact (deltoid rupture), some surgeons explore and repair deltoid. Evidence for deltoid repair is limited - most important is syndesmotic stability.

Intraoperative checklist:

ParameterAcceptableUnacceptable
Tibiofibular overlap (mortise)Greater than 1mmUnder 1mm
Tibiofibular clear space (AP)Under 5mmGreater than 5mm
Medial clear spaceEqual to superior clear spaceWider than superior
Cotton testNo lateral translationPositive translation
Talar tiltNoneAny tilt

All parameters must be within acceptable limits before leaving the OR. Any residual widening or talar shift will result in poor outcomes.

Final films: Obtain AP, mortise, and lateral views. Compare to preoperative films and document anatomic mortise restoration.

Complications

Complications of Maisonneuve Fracture Treatment

ComplicationIncidencePrevention/Management
Syndesmotic malreduction10-20%Careful intraoperative reduction, multiple views, compare to contralateral
Screw breakage5-15%Consider early removal (3-4 months), or use suture button
Post-traumatic arthritis10-30%Anatomic reduction of mortise, address all injuries
Chronic instability5-10%Adequate syndesmotic fixation, treat all components
Heterotopic ossification5-10%Occurs in interosseous membrane, rarely symptomatic
Stiffness10-20%Early motion when stable, aggressive physiotherapy
Wound complications5%Standard wound care, wait for wrinkle test if swollen

Syndesmotic malreduction:

The most important complication to avoid. Malreduction occurs when:

  • Fibula is externally rotated in the incisura
  • Fibula is posteriorly translated
  • Fibula is overcompressed or undercompressed

Even 1-2mm of malreduction increases contact pressures and leads to arthritis. Intraoperative CT may detect subtle malreduction not seen on fluoroscopy.

Malreduction Rate

Studies show syndesmotic malreduction rates of 15-25% even among experienced surgeons. This emphasizes the importance of careful reduction technique and multiple imaging views.

Screw management:

  • Many surgeons remove syndesmotic screws at 3-4 months
  • Allows return to full activity without screw breakage
  • If screw breaks after union, fragments can be left
  • Suture button devices avoid this issue (no removal needed)

Proximal fibula concerns:

The proximal fibula fracture typically heals without intervention. Rarely:

  • Delayed union (very rare)
  • Painful hardware if inadvertently fixed
  • Peroneal nerve injury if surgical approach attempted

Leave the proximal fibula alone - it will heal.

Postoperative Care

Rehabilitation protocol:

Weeks 0-2: Protection
  • Posterior splint or cast
  • Non-weightbearing with crutches/walker
  • Elevation to control swelling
  • Wound checks at 2 weeks
  • Active toe movement encouraged
Weeks 2-6: Early Motion
  • Convert to removable boot
  • Begin ROM exercises out of boot
  • Dorsiflexion/plantarflexion exercises
  • Continue non-weightbearing
  • Physiotherapy referral
Weeks 6-12: Progressive Loading
  • Begin weight-bearing as tolerated in boot
  • Progress to regular shoes with support
  • Strengthening exercises (theraband, calf raises)
  • Balance and proprioception work
  • Radiographic check at 6-8 weeks
Months 3-6: Return to Activity
  • Full weight-bearing in regular shoes
  • Progressive activity increase
  • If screws in place, consider removal at 3-4 months before full activity
  • Sport-specific training
  • Full recovery expected by 6 months

Screw removal:

ApproachWhenConsiderations
Routine removal3-4 monthsAllows full activity without risk of breakage
Symptomatic removalIf painful/stiffSome screws become prominent
Leave in placeIf asymptomaticMay break with full activity but often tolerated
Suture buttonNo removal neededDynamic fixation, no hardware removal surgery

Return to work/sport:

  • Sedentary work: 2-4 weeks (with limitations)
  • Manual labor: 3-6 months
  • Running/jogging: 4-6 months
  • Contact sports: 6 months minimum
  • Full recovery: 6-12 months

Weightbearing Protocol

Most protocols keep patients non-weightbearing for 6 weeks after syndesmotic fixation. This allows membrane healing. Some surgeons allow earlier weightbearing with suture button devices due to dynamic fixation properties.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic factors:

Favorable:

  • Accurate syndesmotic reduction
  • Early surgical treatment
  • Anatomic medial malleolus fixation
  • Compliant patient with rehabilitation

Unfavorable:

  • Syndesmotic malreduction
  • Delayed diagnosis/treatment
  • Associated cartilage damage
  • Persistent mortise widening
  • Older age, obesity, smoking

Outcome measures:

OutcomeResult
Return to pre-injury activity85-90%
AOFAS score85-95 points (good to excellent)
Post-traumatic arthritis10-30% radiographic changes, fewer symptomatic
Return to sport80-90% at same level

Long-term outcomes:

With proper treatment:

  • Most patients achieve good functional outcomes
  • Some degree of stiffness may persist (especially dorsiflexion)
  • Radiographic arthritis may develop but often asymptomatic
  • Chronic instability rare with adequate fixation

Keys to Good Outcomes

Anatomic reduction of the mortise is the single most important factor for good outcomes. Even mild malreduction (2-3mm) significantly increases rates of arthritis and chronic pain. Intraoperative vigilance is critical.

Evidence Base

Level III
📚 Stufkens et al. Systematic Review of Syndesmotic Injuries
Key Findings:
  • Syndesmotic malreduction occurs in 15-25% of cases despite surgical fixation. Malreduction is the strongest predictor of poor outcome. Recommend careful intraoperative assessment and consider CT for complex cases.
Clinical Implication: Emphasizes the importance of accurate reduction over fixation method. Multiple imaging modalities should be used to confirm reduction.
Source: Foot Ankle Int 2012

Level IV
📚 Naqvi et al. Maisonneuve Fractures: A Missed Injury
Key Findings:
  • 20% of Maisonneuve fractures missed on initial presentation. Missed injuries lead to chronic instability and arthritis. Recommend full-length films for any isolated medial ankle injury.
Clinical Implication: Always palpate proximal fibula and obtain full-length films if medial injury without lateral malleolus fracture.
Source: Injury 2012

Level I
📚 Sagi et al. Syndesmotic Screw vs Suture Button
Key Findings:
  • Randomized trial comparing syndesmotic screws to suture button (TightRope). Functional outcomes equivalent at 1 year. Suture button avoided screw removal surgery. No difference in malreduction rate.
Clinical Implication: Both fixation methods produce good outcomes. Suture button may avoid second surgery for screw removal.
Source: J Orthop Trauma 2012

Level III
📚 Gardner et al. Tricortical vs Quadricortical Syndesmotic Screws
Key Findings:
  • No significant difference in stability or outcomes between tricortical and quadricortical syndesmotic screws. Quadricortical screws may be slightly stronger but not clinically significant. Either technique acceptable.
Clinical Implication: Tricortical fixation is generally sufficient. Quadricortical may be considered for very unstable injuries or larger patients.
Source: Foot Ankle Int 2006

Level II
📚 Andersen et al. Deltoid Ligament Repair in Ankle Fractures
Key Findings:
  • No benefit shown for routine deltoid ligament repair in ankle fractures with syndesmotic fixation. Outcomes equivalent with or without deltoid repair. Syndesmotic stability is the key determinant.
Clinical Implication: Deltoid repair is not mandatory if syndesmosis is adequately stabilized. Focus on syndesmotic reduction and fixation.
Source: JBJS Am 2018

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: The Classic Missed Maisonneuve

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents to ED after twisting his ankle playing soccer. Ankle X-rays show an isolated medial malleolus fracture with no fibula fracture visible. There is 6mm medial clear space widening. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This clinical picture is highly suspicious for a **Maisonneuve fracture** - the isolated medial malleolus fracture with widened medial clear space indicates complete syndesmotic disruption. **Immediate assessment:** I would palpate the **entire length of the fibula** from ankle to fibular head. Tenderness at the proximal fibula would confirm my suspicion. I would also examine the syndesmosis - squeeze test and external rotation stress test would likely be positive. **Investigations:** I would order **full-length tibia/fibula radiographs** to visualize the proximal fibula. This will show the characteristic spiral fracture in the proximal third. The 6mm medial clear space widening already indicates complete syndesmotic disruption. **Diagnosis:** This is a Maisonneuve fracture - a Weber C equivalent with: - Proximal fibula fracture - Complete syndesmotic disruption - Medial malleolus fracture **Management plan:** This requires surgical stabilization: 1. **Syndesmotic fixation** - either with 1-2 syndesmotic screws or suture button device 2. **Medial malleolus ORIF** - if displaced (which it likely is given the clear space widening) 3. **Do NOT fix the proximal fibula** - it will heal without intervention I would counsel the patient about 6 weeks non-weightbearing, likely screw removal at 3-4 months, and 6-month recovery timeline. The key teaching point here is to **always consider Maisonneuve when you see isolated medial ankle injury** - it is a commonly missed diagnosis with significant consequences if untreated.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Isolated medial malleolus fracture = suspect Maisonneuve
Widened medial clear space (greater than 4mm) indicates syndesmotic disruption
Always palpate the entire fibula
Order full-length tibia/fibula films
Syndesmotic fixation is mandatory
Do NOT fix the proximal fibula
Medial malleolus ORIF if displaced
Screw removal typically at 3-4 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing the diagnosis by not examining proximal fibula
✗Not ordering full-length films
✗Attempting to fix the proximal fibula
✗Treating as simple medial malleolus fracture without syndesmotic fixation
✗Recommending nonoperative management
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How would you fix the syndesmosis?"
"When would you remove the syndesmotic screws?"
"What if the proximal fibula was at the neck - any special considerations?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Syndesmotic Fixation Technique

EXAMINER

"You are in theatre fixing a Maisonneuve fracture. The medial malleolus has been fixed. You are now addressing the syndesmosis. Describe your technique for syndesmotic reduction and fixation. How do you confirm adequate reduction?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Syndesmotic fixation is the critical step in Maisonneuve fracture management. Let me describe my technique. **Positioning and exposure:** The patient is supine with a bump under the ipsilateral hip. I make a lateral incision over the distal fibula and expose the syndesmosis. I clear out hematoma and identify the fibular notch (incisura) on the tibia. **Reduction:** I reduce the fibula anatomically into the incisura using a pointed reduction clamp. The clamp is placed from posterolateral fibula to anteromedial tibia. The foot must be in **neutral or slight dorsiflexion** to prevent over-narrowing (talus is wider anteriorly). **Confirming reduction:** I use fluoroscopy to check: - **Mortise view**: tibiofibular overlap should be greater than 1mm - **AP view**: tibiofibular clear space should be under 5mm - **Lateral view**: fibula should be correctly positioned (not posteriorly translated) - I compare to preoperative films of the contralateral ankle if available **Fixation:** With the clamp holding reduction, I place a **syndesmotic screw**: - 2cm proximal to the joint line - Directed 25-30 degrees anterior to coronal plane (parallel to joint) - I use a 3.5mm or 4.5mm cortical screw - **Tricortical fixation** (through lateral fibular cortex, medial fibular cortex, lateral tibial cortex) - I may add a second screw 1-2cm proximal if the injury is particularly unstable **Final confirmation:** I perform a **Cotton test** - applying lateral translation to the talus. There should be no movement with adequate fixation. I obtain final AP, mortise, and lateral views documenting anatomic mortise. **Alternative - suture button:** I could use a suture button device (TightRope) instead of screws. This provides dynamic fixation and avoids the need for screw removal, though it is more expensive. The most critical point is achieving **anatomic reduction** - even 1-2mm of malreduction leads to poor outcomes.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Foot in neutral or slight dorsiflexion during fixation
Use reduction clamp from posterolateral fibula to anteromedial tibia
Screw 2cm proximal to joint, angled 25-30 degrees anteriorly
Tricortical fixation is standard (may use quadricortical)
Confirm reduction with fluoroscopy: overlap greater than 1mm, clear space under 5mm
Cotton test should be negative after fixation
Malreduction rate is 15-25% even in experienced hands
Suture button is alternative to screws, avoids removal surgery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Fixing with foot in plantarflexion (limits dorsiflexion)
✗Not checking multiple fluoroscopy views
✗Over- or under-compression of syndesmosis
✗Missing fibular rotation in the incisura
✗Not performing Cotton test after fixation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the Cotton test is still positive after one screw?"
"Tricortical or quadricortical - which do you prefer and why?"
"When would you consider suture button over screws?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 3: Postoperative Management Decision

EXAMINER

"You have fixed a Maisonneuve fracture 3 months ago. The patient is doing well, walking in a boot, but is keen to return to running. The syndesmotic screws are intact on X-ray. What are your recommendations?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a common scenario - a patient with good recovery at 3 months wanting to return to activity with syndesmotic screws still in place. **Assessment at 3 months:** I would: - Clinically examine the patient - check ROM, swelling, tenderness - Confirm syndesmosis healing - no widening on stress or comparison films - Assess functional status - can they walk without pain or limp **Screw management options:** **Option 1: Remove screws before full activity (my preference)** - Syndesmotic screws are designed to hold reduction during healing - Full activity with screws in place risks **screw breakage** - Broken screws can be symptomatic and are harder to remove - Removal is a minor day procedure, low morbidity - After removal, 2-4 weeks of progressive activity, then running **Option 2: Leave screws and proceed with activity** - Some patients and surgeons accept the risk of breakage - If screw breaks after healing, can often be left - Avoids second surgery - Risk: symptomatic hardware, stiffness **My recommendation:** I would recommend **screw removal** at this 3-month point before returning to running. The procedure is low-risk, avoids screw breakage, and allows full unrestricted activity. I would bring him back for a minor procedure, then start a graduated return to running program at 4 weeks post-removal. If he strongly declines removal, I would counsel about the risk of screw breakage and accept his preference. However, I believe removal at 3-4 months is the optimal approach for active patients. **Timeline after removal:** - Week 1-2: Protected weight-bearing, begin jogging - Week 2-4: Progressive running - Week 4+: Full activity, sport-specific training
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
3-4 months is typical timing for syndesmotic screw removal
Screws at risk of breakage with full activity
Broken screws can be symptomatic or difficult to remove
Removal is low-risk day procedure
Alternative: leave screws if patient declines removal
Suture button devices avoid this issue entirely
2-4 weeks after removal before high-impact activity
Full recovery expected by 6 months from original injury
COMMON TRAPS
✗Allowing full activity with screws still in place without counseling
✗Not discussing the option of removal
✗Removing screws too early (before 3 months)
✗Not having a plan for graduated return to activity
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if you had used a suture button instead?"
"What if the patient is a professional athlete wanting faster return?"
"What if the screw had already broken?"

MCQ Practice Points

Mechanism Question

Q: What is the mechanism of Maisonneuve fracture? A: External rotation with pronation (PER mechanism). The foot is everted, and external rotation force on the planted foot causes sequential failure of medial structures, syndesmosis, and proximal fibula.

Imaging Question

Q: What imaging should be ordered for a patient with isolated medial malleolus fracture? A: Full-length tibia/fibula radiographs to exclude Maisonneuve fracture. The medial injury without lateral ankle fracture should prompt assessment for proximal fibula fracture.

Fibula Fixation Question

Q: Should the proximal fibula fracture in Maisonneuve be surgically fixed? A: No. The proximal fibula heals well without intervention. The problem is the syndesmosis, which must be fixed. Attempting to fix the proximal fibula risks peroneal nerve injury without benefit.

Syndesmotic Fixation Question

Q: What is the optimal position for syndesmotic screw placement? A: 2cm proximal to the ankle joint, angled 25-30 degrees anterior to the coronal plane (parallel to the syndesmosis). The foot should be in neutral or slight dorsiflexion during fixation.

Weber Classification Question

Q: How is Maisonneuve fracture classified in the Weber system? A: Weber C equivalent. Although the fibula fracture is proximal, the complete syndesmotic disruption makes it functionally equivalent to a Weber C injury requiring syndesmotic fixation.

Screw Removal Question

Q: When should syndesmotic screws be removed? A: Typically 3-4 months post-fixation, before return to full activity. This prevents screw breakage. Alternatively, suture button devices provide dynamic fixation and do not require removal.

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia:

  • Common in sporting population, especially AFL, rugby, soccer
  • Missed diagnosis remains an issue in emergency departments
  • Full-length films now more routinely ordered

Management pathway:

  • Emergency department: ankle X-rays → if suspicious, full-length films
  • Orthopaedic referral for all confirmed cases
  • Surgery typically within 1-2 weeks at metropolitan trauma centres
  • Regional centres may transfer complex cases

Implant availability:

  • Syndesmotic screws widely available (3.5mm and 4.5mm)
  • Suture button devices (TightRope, etc.) available but more costly
  • Choice often influenced by surgeon preference and hospital stock

Rehabilitation:

  • Private physiotherapy widely available
  • Public hospital physiotherapy may have waiting times
  • Return to work considerations for manual workers (6+ months)
  • Sports medicine physicians involved for return to sport in athletes

Orthopaedic Exam Focus

The Maisonneuve fracture is an exam favourite because it tests:

  1. Recognition of the injury pattern (missed diagnosis scenario)
  2. Understanding of syndesmotic anatomy
  3. Knowledge that fibula doesn't need fixation
  4. Syndesmotic screw technique and alternatives
  5. Postoperative management including screw removal

Expect a scenario with isolated medial ankle injury where you must recognize the need for full-length films.

MAISONNEUVE FRACTURES

High-Yield Exam Summary

DIAGNOSIS

  • •Proximal fibula fracture + syndesmotic disruption + medial injury
  • •Weber C equivalent - complete syndesmosis tear
  • •MISSED INJURY - always palpate entire fibula
  • •Order full-length films if isolated medial injury

MECHANISM

  • •External rotation with pronation (PER)
  • •Energy propagates through interosseous membrane
  • •Fibula fractures proximally where it's thinnest
  • •Medial malleolus or deltoid must fail for instability

SURGICAL PRINCIPLES

  • •DO NOT FIX the proximal fibula
  • •MUST FIX the syndesmosis (screws or suture button)
  • •ORIF medial malleolus if displaced
  • •Deltoid repair not mandatory if syndesmosis stable

SYNDESMOTIC FIXATION

  • •2cm proximal to joint, angle 25-30 degrees anterior
  • •Tricortical or quadricortical (either acceptable)
  • •Foot in neutral/dorsiflexion during fixation
  • •Cotton test to confirm stability

RADIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS

  • •Tibiofibular overlap greater than 1mm (mortise view)
  • •Tibiofibular clear space under 5mm (AP view)
  • •Medial clear space equal to superior clear space
  • •Any diastasis or talar shift = unacceptable

POSTOPERATIVE

  • •Non-weightbearing 6 weeks
  • •Protected weightbearing weeks 6-12
  • •Screw removal at 3-4 months if used
  • •Suture button: no removal needed

OUTCOMES

  • •90%+ good/excellent outcomes
  • •Malreduction rate 15-25%
  • •Malreduction = strongest predictor of poor outcome
  • •Full recovery 6 months

EXAM TRAPS

  • •Missing the diagnosis (not palpating proximal fibula)
  • •Recommending fibula fixation
  • •Not understanding syndesmosis is the key issue
  • •Allowing full activity with screws in place
Quick Stats
Reading Time114 min
Related Topics

Acetabular Fractures

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Acute Compartment Syndrome

Ankle Fractures