Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Nerve Injury and Regeneration

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Nerve Injury and Regeneration

Comprehensive guide to peripheral nerve injury classification, Wallerian degeneration, chromatolysis, Schwann cell biology, axonal regeneration and factors affecting nerve repair for basic science viva preparation

complete
Updated: 2024-12-25
High Yield Overview

NERVE INJURY AND REGENERATION

Seddon and Sunderland Classifications | Wallerian Degeneration | Schwann Cell Bands of Büngner | 1mm/day Growth

1mm/dayAxonal regeneration rate
24-48hrWallerian degeneration onset
7-14 daysPeak chromatolysis in cell body
3 monthsOptimal repair window

SEDDON CLASSIFICATION

Neurapraxia
PatternConduction block, myelin injury only
TreatmentFull recovery in weeks-months
Axonotmesis
PatternAxon disrupted, endoneurium intact
TreatmentRegeneration possible, good prognosis
Neurotmesis
PatternComplete nerve disruption
TreatmentRequires surgical repair

Critical Must-Knows

  • Wallerian degeneration occurs distal to injury site within 24-48 hours
  • Chromatolysis is the proximal cell body response preparing for regeneration
  • Schwann cells form bands of Büngner guiding axonal regrowth
  • Growth cone at axon tip extends 1mm per day in peripheral nerves
  • Sunderland classification has 5 degrees based on which structures are injured

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Seddon: neurapraxia, axonotmesis, neurotmesis (increasing severity)
  • "
    Sunderland adds detail: degrees I-V (I = neurapraxia, V = neurotmesis)
  • "
    Tinel sign progression indicates axonal regeneration front
  • "
    Primary repair within 3 months has better outcomes than delayed repair

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Enhanced expression of claudin 14 promoted Schwann cell proliferation (2 days).(A) Over-expression of claudin 14 for 2 days promoted Schwann cell (Red) proliferation in pCMV6-claudin 14 plasmid transf
Click to expand
Enhanced expression of claudin 14 promoted Schwann cell proliferation (2 days).(A) Over-expression of claudin 14 for 2 days promoted Schwann cell (RedCredit: Gong L et al. via Neural Regen Res via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Visualization of breakdown of the blood nerve barrier (BNB) (A,B) and inflammation in experimental nerve crush (C–F). Coronal images depict the pelvis and both thighs of a rat lying in prone position
Click to expand
Visualization of breakdown of the blood nerve barrier (BNB) (A,B) and inflammation in experimental nerve crush (C–F). Coronal images depict the pelvisCredit: Weise G et al. via Front Neurol via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
ATF3 immunoreactivity in the proximal and distal stumps of severed sciatic nerves in adult rats at 4, 8, 16 and 30 dpo. Figs. 1A,1C,1E and 1G show proximal stumps and Figs. 1B,1D,1F and 1H show distal
Click to expand
ATF3 immunoreactivity in the proximal and distal stumps of severed sciatic nerves in adult rats at 4, 8, 16 and 30 dpo. Figs. 1A,1C,1E and 1G show proCredit: Hunt D et al. via BMC Neurosci via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Critical Nerve Injury Exam Points

Wallerian Degeneration

Axon and myelin distal to injury degenerate within 24-48 hours. Schwann cells phagocytose debris and proliferate to form bands of Büngner. This is essential to clear path for regenerating axon.

Chromatolysis

Cell body response to axonal injury. Nissl substance disperses, nucleus becomes eccentric, cell body swells. Peaks at 7-14 days. Cell shifts from neurotransmission to regeneration mode.

Schwann Cell Role

Schwann cells are critical for regeneration. They form bands of Büngner (tubular scaffolds), secrete growth factors (NGF, BDNF, GDNF), and guide axons to targets. Without endoneurial tubes, misdirection occurs.

Growth Cone

Growth cone at axon tip extends filopodia sensing chemical gradients. Responds to neurotrophic factors and extracellular matrix cues. Rate of 1mm per day limits functional recovery in proximal injuries.

At a Glance

Peripheral nerve injuries are classified by Seddon (neurapraxia/axonotmesis/neurotmesis) and Sunderland (Grades I-V). Wallerian degeneration begins within 24-48 hours distal to injury—axon and myelin fragment while Schwann cells phagocytose debris and proliferate to form bands of Büngner (tubular scaffolds). Chromatolysis is the proximal cell body response (Nissl dispersion, nuclear eccentricity) peaking at 7-14 days as the neuron shifts from transmission to regeneration mode. The growth cone at the axon tip extends filopodia sensing neurotrophic gradients (NGF, BDNF), regenerating at 1mm/day (1 inch/month). Neurapraxia (myelin only) recovers spontaneously; axonotmesis (axon disrupted, endoneurium intact) can regenerate; neurotmesis (complete transection) requires surgical repair within 3 months for optimal outcomes.

Mnemonic

SEDDONSEDDON - Nerve Injury Classification

S
Stretch injuries common
Neurapraxia from traction/compression
E
Endoneurium intact in axonotmesis
Axon disrupted but tubes remain
D
Degeneration (Wallerian) in axonotmesis/neurotmesis
Distal axon degenerates
D
Division complete in neurotmesis
All structures transected
O
Only myelin in neurapraxia
Axon continuity preserved
N
No surgery needed for neurapraxia
Spontaneous recovery expected

Memory Hook:SEDDON classification goes from minor (neurapraxia) to severe (neurotmesis)

Mnemonic

WALLERIANWALLERIAN - Degeneration Process

W
Within 24-48 hours starts
Rapid onset after axonal injury
A
Axon fragments distally
Distal to injury site
L
Loss of myelin sheath
Myelin breaks down into lipid droplets
L
Leukocytes invade (macrophages)
Phagocytose debris with Schwann cells
E
Endoneurial tubes remain
If endoneurium intact (axonotmesis)
R
Regeneration can occur through tubes
Bands of Büngner guide regrowth
I
Intact proximal stump
Must survive to regenerate
A
Anterograde degeneration only
Distal to injury, not proximal
N
Neuroma forms if misdirected
Without proper guidance

Memory Hook:WALLERIAN degeneration clears the distal stump to allow regeneration

Mnemonic

BUNGNERBÜNGNER - Schwann Cell Bands

B
Bands formed by Schwann cells
Tubular scaffolds for axons
U
Useful for guiding regeneration
Direct axons to original targets
N
NGF and neurotrophins secreted
Nerve growth factor supports regrowth
G
Growth cone follows chemical signals
Chemotaxis toward target
N
Need intact endoneurium
Tubes collapse in neurotmesis
E
Encourage axonal extension
Provide permissive environment
R
Remyelinate regenerated axons
Schwann cells wrap new myelin

Memory Hook:BUNGNER bands are Schwann cell tubes that guide and support regenerating axons

Overview and Classification

Peripheral nerve injury is common in trauma and surgical complications. Understanding the biological response to nerve injury is fundamental to predicting recovery and determining surgical indications. The nerve's capacity for regeneration depends on injury severity, timing of repair, and preservation of endoneurial architecture.

Why nerve injury biology matters clinically:

Prognosis Prediction

Seddon/Sunderland classification determines expected recovery. Neurapraxia recovers fully, axonotmesis recovers well if endoneurium intact, neurotmesis requires surgical repair. Electrodiagnostics differentiate types.

Timing of Surgery

Primary repair within 3 months optimal. Delayed repair allows fibrosis of endoneurial tubes and target muscle atrophy. After 18-24 months motor recovery unlikely even with perfect repair.

Seddon vs Sunderland

Seddon (1943) has 3 types based on functional outcomes. Sunderland (1951) has 5 degrees based on anatomical structures injured. Seddon is simpler for clinical use. Sunderland adds detail: degree I equals neurapraxia, degrees II-IV are types of axonotmesis with increasing structural damage, degree V equals neurotmesis.

Concepts and Mechanisms

Peripheral nerve regeneration depends on three fundamental biological processes working in concert:

1. Wallerian Degeneration (Distal Stump)

The distal nerve segment undergoes active degeneration starting 24-48 hours after injury. This is not passive decay but a coordinated cellular response:

  • Axon fragments into ellipsoids
  • Myelin breaks down into lipid droplets
  • Schwann cells phagocytose debris (40-50%)
  • Macrophages recruited to clear remaining debris
  • c-Jun activation drives Schwann cell transformation

Purpose: Clear inhibitory molecules (MAG, Nogo) and create permissive environment.

2. Chromatolysis (Proximal Cell Body)

The neuronal cell body in dorsal root ganglion (sensory) or anterior horn (motor) undergoes metabolic reprogramming:

  • Nissl substance disperses (rough ER moves to periphery)
  • Nucleus becomes eccentric
  • Cell body swells 30-50%
  • Gene expression shifts from neurotransmission to growth
  • Upregulate GAP-43, tubulin, actin

Purpose: Prepare neuron for axonal regeneration by producing growth-associated proteins.

3. Axonal Regeneration (Growth Cone)

The proximal axon stump forms a growth cone that navigates toward the target:

  • Multiple sprouts emerge (20-50 initially)
  • Growth cone extends filopodia sensing chemical gradients
  • Follows bands of Büngner in endoneurial tubes
  • Advances 1-3mm per day
  • Forms synapse when target contacted

Purpose: Re-establish neuronal connection to target organ (muscle, skin receptor).

The Three-Part Process

All three processes must succeed for functional recovery. Wallerian degeneration without regeneration leaves denervated targets. Chromatolysis without successful reinnervation leads to neuronal death. Growth cone navigation without intact endoneurial tubes causes neuroma formation.

Key Biological Principles

Endoneurial Tubes Critical

Intact endoneurial tubes (axonotmesis) allow bands of Büngner to guide regenerating axons to correct targets. Disrupted tubes (neurotmesis) cause misdirection and poor outcomes even with surgical repair.

Time-Dependent Success

Schwann cell bands persist 3-4 months then deteriorate. Muscle endplates survive 18-24 months then degenerate. These biological clocks determine surgical timing windows.

Distance Limitation

1mm per day regeneration limits functional recovery in proximal injuries. A 30cm injury requires 300 days (10 months) for axons to reach distal muscles - often exceeding viable reinnervation window.

Schwann Cell Dominance

Schwann cells orchestrate regeneration by clearing debris, forming guidance tubes, secreting neurotrophins (NGF, BDNF, GDNF), and remyelinating. Without Schwann cell response, regeneration fails.

Clinical Relevance

Understanding nerve injury biology directly informs clinical decision-making in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Diagnosis and Classification

Clinical Differentiation of Nerve Injuries

FeatureNeurapraxiaAxonotmesisNeurotmesis
Clinical presentationWeakness without atrophyWeakness with progressive atrophyComplete paralysis with rapid atrophy
Sensory lossPatchy, incompleteComplete in distributionComplete in distribution
EMG findings (3 weeks)No denervation potentialsDenervation potentialsDenervation potentials
Nerve conductionConduction block at injury siteAbsent distal to injuryAbsent distal to injury
Tinel signStationary at injury siteAdvancing 1mm per dayStationary (neuroma) without repair

Electrodiagnostic testing at 3-4 weeks distinguishes neurapraxia (no denervation, conduction block) from axonotmesis/neurotmesis (denervation potentials, absent conduction). Serial testing shows recovery in neurapraxia, advancing Tinel in axonotmesis, or no recovery in neurotmesis.

Prognosis Estimation

Calculate expected recovery time based on injury level and regeneration rate:

Example: Median nerve laceration at wrist (12cm to thenar muscles):

  • Time to reinnervation: 12cm ÷ 1mm/day equals 120 days (4 months)
  • Add chromatolysis time (2-3 weeks) equals 5 months to first motor recovery
  • Muscle strength improvement continues 12-18 months

Example: Brachial plexus injury at Erb point (35cm to hand intrinsics):

  • Time to reinnervation: 35cm ÷ 1mm/day equals 350 days (11.5 months)
  • Add chromatolysis time equals 12-13 months to first motor recovery
  • Exceeds 18-24 month motor endplate viability - poor prognosis

Surgical Decision-Making

Surgical Timing Based on Biology

0-7 days

Immediate/delayed primary repair for clean sharp lacerations. Wound not contaminated, nerve ends fresh, minimal fibrosis. Best outcomes.

2-12 weeks

Secondary repair after wound healing in contaminated injuries. Nerve ends may need debridement. Schwann cell bands still intact and active.

3-6 months

Late repair still possible but outcomes declining. Schwann cell bands deteriorating. Muscle atrophy beginning. Consider nerve grafting if gap present.

Over 6 months

Very late repair has poor motor outcomes. Schwann cells atrophied, endoneurial tubes fibrosed. Sensory recovery may still occur. Consider reconstruction (tendon transfers) instead.

Surgical technique modifications based on biology:

  • Tension-free repair: Tension over 10% gap strain causes ischemia, fibrosis, failure - use nerve grafting
  • Fascicular matching: Align motor and sensory fascicles to prevent misdirection in mixed nerves
  • Minimal debridement: Preserve maximal endoneurial tubes for bands of Büngner guidance
  • Primary neurorrhaphy vs grafting: Direct repair if gap under 3cm, grafting if larger (sural nerve donor)

Patient Counseling

Realistic expectations based on injury biology:

Good prognosis (likely functional recovery):

  • Young patient (faster regeneration)
  • Distal injury (short distance)
  • Sharp laceration (minimal zone of injury)
  • Early repair (within 3 months)
  • Pure motor or sensory nerve (less misdirection)

Poor prognosis (limited functional recovery):

  • Elderly patient (slower regeneration)
  • Proximal injury (long distance, time exceeds endplate viability)
  • Crush or avulsion (wide zone of injury)
  • Late presentation (beyond 6 months)
  • Mixed nerve (misdirection risk)

Set realistic expectations with patients. A brachial plexus injury in a 65-year-old at 9 months post-injury will not regain meaningful motor function even with perfect surgical repair. Offer reconstruction (tendon transfers, arthrodesis) instead of creating false hope.

Anatomy

Peripheral Nerve Structure

Nerve Connective Tissue Layers (Inside to Out)

LayerSurroundsFunctionClinical Significance
EndoneuriumIndividual axonsCollagen tubes for Schwann cellsPreservation critical for regeneration guidance
PerineuriumFascicles (groups of axons)Blood-nerve barrier, tensile strengthDisruption causes axonal misdirection
EpineuriumEntire nerve trunkExternal protective layer, blood supply entrySurgical plane for nerve repair

Schwann Cell Arrangement

Myelinated fibers:

  • One Schwann cell per internode (1-2mm)
  • Nodes of Ranvier between internodes
  • Saltatory conduction (fast)

Unmyelinated fibers:

  • One Schwann cell wraps multiple axons
  • Slower conduction velocity

Vascular Supply

Extrinsic supply:

  • Segmental vessels from adjacent arteries
  • Enter through epineurium

Intrinsic supply:

  • Longitudinal network in epineurium
  • Critical for survival during mobilization

Exam Viva Point: Why Endoneurial Tubes Matter

The endoneurial tube is the key to successful regeneration.

  • If endoneurium intact (axonotmesis): Regenerating axon follows the tube to its original target
  • If endoneurium disrupted (neurotmesis): Axons enter wrong tubes → misdirection → poor functional recovery

Bands of Büngner form within endoneurial tubes, providing guidance scaffolds.

Detailed Nerve Microanatomy

Axon Types and Characteristics

Fiber TypeMyelinationDiameterConduction VelocityFunction
AαThick myelin12-20 μm70-120 m/sMotor, proprioception
AβMyelin5-12 μm30-70 m/sTouch, pressure
AδThin myelin2-5 μm12-30 m/sPain, temperature
CUnmyelinated0.5-2 μm0.5-2 m/sPain, autonomic

Fascicular Organization

Fascicular Patterns

Monofascicular:

  • Single fascicle (small nerves)
  • Digital nerves

Oligofascicular:

  • 2-5 fascicles
  • Most peripheral nerves

Polyfascicular:

  • Many fascicles with plexiform connections
  • Major nerve trunks (median, ulnar at wrist)

Motor-Sensory Organization

Proximal nerve:

  • Motor and sensory fascicles intermixed
  • Difficult fascicular matching

Distal nerve:

  • Motor and sensory fascicles separated
  • Easier identification for repair

Clinical: Distal repairs have better outcomes partly due to better fascicular matching.

Exam Viva Point: Blood Supply Considerations

Why tension-free repair is critical:

  • Nerve blood supply enters segmentally through epineurium
  • Longitudinal vessels provide redundancy
  • Tension greater than 10% gap strain causes ischemia at repair site
  • Mobilization safe for several cm but excessive stretch disrupts intrinsic supply
  • If tension unavoidable: use nerve graft rather than tensioned repair

Classification Systems

Seddon Classification (1943)

Three types based on severity and prognosis:

Seddon Classification

FeatureNeurapraxiaAxonotmesisNeurotmesis
Axon continuityIntactDisruptedDisrupted
EndoneuriumIntactIntactDisrupted
Wallerian degenerationNoYes (distal)Yes (distal)
ConductionBlocked locallyLost distalLost distal
PrognosisExcellent (weeks-months)Good (months)Poor without surgery
Recovery rateDemyelination recovery1mm per day regrowthDepends on repair quality

Neurapraxia is a local conduction block from myelin injury (compression, traction, ischemia). The axon remains in continuity. No Wallerian degeneration occurs. Recovery is complete within weeks to months as myelin regenerates. Most common in Saturday night palsy (radial nerve compression), prolonged tourniquet use.

Axonotmesis involves axonal disruption but preservation of endoneurial tubes (and perineurium, epineurium). Wallerian degeneration occurs distal to injury. Proximal axon regenerates through intact endoneurial tubes at 1mm per day. Prognosis is good because bands of Büngner guide axons to original targets. May occur with severe traction, crush, or ischemia.

Neurotmesis is complete nerve transection with disruption of all structures including endoneurium. Wallerian degeneration occurs but regenerating axons have no guidance channels. Neuroma forms at injury site. Surgical repair is required for any recovery. Even with repair, outcomes are limited by misdirection and target muscle atrophy.

This classification is most useful clinically.

Sunderland Classification (1951)

Five degrees based on anatomical structures:

Sunderland Classification

DegreeStructure InjuredSeddon EquivalentRecovery
IMyelin onlyNeurapraxiaComplete, rapid
IIAxon (endoneurium intact)AxonotmesisGood regeneration
IIIAxon plus endoneurium (perineurium intact)AxonotmesisVariable, may need surgery
IVAxon plus endo plus perineurium (epineurium intact)AxonotmesisPoor without surgery
VComplete transectionNeurotmesisRequires surgical repair

Degree I is equivalent to neurapraxia. Local myelin injury causes conduction block. Axon and all connective tissue sheaths intact. Complete recovery in days to weeks.

Degree II is axonal disruption with intact endoneurial tubes. This is classic axonotmesis. Wallerian degeneration occurs but bands of Büngner guide regeneration. Good functional recovery expected.

Degree III involves endoneurial disruption but intact perineurium (fascicle sheath). Regenerating axons may enter wrong endoneurial tubes within the fascicle, causing misdirection. Internal neurolysis may help but outcomes variable.

Degree IV disrupts perineurium but epineurium (nerve sheath) intact. Axons may regenerate into wrong fascicles entirely. External neurolysis or interfascicular grafting may be needed. Poor recovery without surgery.

Degree V is complete transection equivalent to neurotmesis. Requires surgical repair (primary neurorrhaphy or nerve grafting). Even with optimal repair, outcomes limited by misdirection and chronicity.

Mackinnon added degree VI (mixed injury) where different fascicles have different Sunderland degrees. Common in stretch injuries. Requires careful assessment and selective fascicular repair.

The Sunderland classification is more detailed but Seddon remains most practical.

Nerve Anatomy Layers

From inside out: endoneurium (surrounds individual axons), perineurium (surrounds fascicles), epineurium (surrounds entire nerve). Blood supply enters through epineurium. Injury to deeper layers causes more misdirection during regeneration.

Wallerian Degeneration

Wallerian degeneration is the process of axonal and myelin breakdown distal to a nerve injury site. Named after Augustus Waller (1850) who first described it. This is an active process, not passive decay, requiring Schwann cells and macrophages.

Wallerian Degeneration Timeline

0-24 hours

Immediate response: Axon transport interrupted, distal axon swells due to calcium influx, cytoskeleton breaks down.

24-48 hours

Axonal fragmentation: Distal axon breaks into fragments (ellipsoids). Myelin sheath begins to fragment. Schwann cells detect injury signals.

2-3 days

Schwann cell activation: Schwann cells dedifferentiate, proliferate, and begin phagocytosing myelin debris. Macrophages recruited from blood.

1-2 weeks

Debris clearance: Macrophages and Schwann cells clear myelin and axonal debris. Schwann cells form columns (bands of Büngner) within endoneurial tubes.

3-4 weeks

Ready for regeneration: Endoneurial tubes clear, bands of Büngner secreting neurotrophic factors (NGF, BDNF, GDNF), awaiting regenerating axon.

Key molecular events:

  • Calcium influx triggers axonal breakdown via calpain-mediated cytoskeletal degradation
  • Ubiquitin-proteasome system degrades axonal proteins
  • Schwann cells express c-Jun transcription factor driving dedifferentiation and pro-regenerative phenotype
  • Macrophages recruited by CCL2 and MCP-1 chemokines secreted by Schwann cells
  • Endoneurial fibroblasts proliferate if denervation prolonged, causing fibrosis

Why Wallerian Degeneration is Necessary

Wallerian degeneration is essential for regeneration. Myelin debris contains inhibitory molecules (MAG - myelin-associated glycoprotein) that block axonal growth. Clearing debris and converting Schwann cells to pro-regenerative state creates permissive environment. Without this, regeneration fails.

Proximal (retrograde) degeneration also occurs but is limited. Extends 3-5mm proximal to injury site (one or two nodes of Ranvier). If severe injury causes cell body death (chromatolysis failure), entire neuron dies.

Chromatolysis - Cell Body Response

Chromatolysis is the morphological and metabolic response of the neuronal cell body to axonal injury. The neuron switches from neurotransmission mode to regeneration mode. Occurs in dorsal root ganglion (sensory) and anterior horn (motor) cell bodies.

Histological features (visible on Nissl staining):

  1. Nissl substance dispersal - ribosomes and rough endoplasmic reticulum move from center to periphery (chromatolysis means dissolution of color on Nissl stain)
  2. Nuclear eccentricity - nucleus moves to cell periphery
  3. Cell body swelling - volume increases 30-50%
  4. Nucleolar enlargement - increased protein synthesis

Molecular changes:

  • Downregulation of neurotransmitter genes (acetylcholine, neurotransmitter receptors)
  • Upregulation of growth-associated genes - GAP-43, tubulin, actin, cytoskeletal proteins
  • Increased protein synthesis - ribosomal RNA production, rough ER expansion
  • Activation of transcription factors - ATF3, c-Jun, STAT3 drive regeneration program
  • Enhanced axonal transport - kinesin and dynein motors upregulated

Cell Body Response to Injury

FeatureNormal NeuronChromatolysisFailed Regeneration
Nissl substanceCentral distributionDispersed to peripheryAbsent (atrophy)
Nucleus positionCentralEccentric (peripheral)Pyknotic (condensed)
Cell volumeBaselineIncreased 30-50%Decreased (shrinkage)
Gene expressionNeurotransmissionGrowth and regenerationApoptotic markers
OutcomeNormal functionRegeneration if successfulCell death

Critical concept: Chromatolysis is a positive response indicating cell survival and regeneration attempt. Absence of chromatolysis after nerve injury suggests cell death. Prolonged chromatolysis beyond 3-4 weeks without successful regeneration leads to neuronal atrophy and eventual apoptosis.

Clinical Correlation

Muscle atrophy parallels chromatolysis. Motor neurons that fail to reinnervate muscle within 12-18 months undergo apoptosis. Muscle fibers denervated beyond 18-24 months undergo irreversible fibrofatty degeneration. This is why timing of nerve repair is critical - delay beyond 6-12 months severely compromises motor recovery.

Schwann Cell Biology in Regeneration

Schwann cells are the glial cells of the peripheral nervous system. In myelinated fibers, one Schwann cell wraps one internode of myelin. After nerve injury, Schwann cells undergo dramatic phenotypic transformation to support regeneration.

Schwann cell functions in nerve regeneration:

Debris Clearance

Phagocytose myelin and axonal debris with macrophages. Schwann cells express phagocytic receptors and clear 40-50% of debris themselves. Secrete chemokines (CCL2, MCP-1) recruiting macrophages for remaining debris.

Bands of Büngner Formation

Form tubular scaffolds by aligning in columns within endoneurial tubes. Create physical guidance channels directing regenerating axons toward original targets. Without endoneurial tubes (neurotmesis), bands collapse and neuroma forms.

Neurotrophic Support

Secrete growth factors: NGF (nerve growth factor), BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), GDNF (glial-derived neurotrophic factor), CNTF (ciliary neurotrophic factor), and FGF (fibroblast growth factor). Create chemical gradient guiding growth cone.

Remyelination

Remyelinate regenerated axons once contact re-established. Transition back to myelinating phenotype. Remyelinated internodes are shorter and myelin thinner than original, explaining slower conduction velocity after regeneration.

Molecular regulation of Schwann cell response:

The transcription factor c-Jun is master regulator of Schwann cell dedifferentiation and pro-regenerative phenotype. c-Jun knockout mice show failed Wallerian degeneration and poor nerve regeneration.

  • c-Jun upregulation drives dedifferentiation, proliferation, and growth factor secretion
  • Sox2 expression maintains dedifferentiated state
  • Neuregulin-1 signaling from regenerating axon promotes remyelination
  • Laminin and fibronectin in Schwann cell basal lamina provide extracellular matrix cues for axonal growth

Schwann Cell Response After Nerve Injury

0-24 hours

Detection of injury: Loss of axonal contact signals detected. Schwann cells sense absence of neuregulin-1 and other axonal signals.

1-3 days

Dedifferentiation: Schwann cells downregulate myelin genes (P0, MBP, PMP22), upregulate c-Jun and growth factor genes. Begin to proliferate.

3-7 days

Proliferation and alignment: Schwann cells divide and align into columns (bands of Büngner) within endoneurial tubes. Begin secreting neurotrophic factors.

1-4 weeks

Pro-regenerative state: Schwann cells maintain bands, secrete growth factors, clear debris with macrophages. Create permissive environment for axonal regrowth.

Months

Remyelination or atrophy: If regenerating axon arrives, Schwann cells remyelinate. If no axon contact by 3-4 months, bands gradually deteriorate and endoneurial tubes fibrose.

Denervated Schwann Cell Lifespan

Schwann cells maintain bands of Büngner for 3-4 months awaiting regenerating axon. After this, bands gradually deteriorate, endoneurial tubes collapse and fibrose. This is why nerve repair beyond 6-12 months has poor outcomes - loss of Schwann cell guidance and endoneurial tube integrity.

Axonal Regeneration and Growth Cone

Axonal regeneration begins within days of injury. The proximal axon stump forms a growth cone at its tip, which extends processes (filopodia and lamellipodia) sensing the local environment and navigating toward the target.

Growth cone structure and function:

The growth cone is a specialized structure at the regenerating axon tip containing:

  • Filopodia - thin finger-like projections extending 10-50 micrometers, sensing chemical and physical cues
  • Lamellipodia - sheet-like membrane expansions between filopodia, providing surface for advancement
  • Growth cone receptors - Trk receptors for neurotrophins (NGF, BDNF, GDNF), integrins for extracellular matrix, semaphorin receptors, ephrin receptors
  • Cytoskeletal machinery - actin filaments in filopodia, microtubules in central domain, motor proteins (myosin, kinesin) for advancement

Guidance mechanisms:

Axonal Guidance Mechanisms

MechanismMoleculesEffectSource
ChemoattractionNGF, BDNF, GDNF, CNTFGrowth cone advances toward gradientSchwann cells, target organ
Contact attractionLaminin, fibronectin, N-CAMGrowth cone adheres and advancesSchwann cell basal lamina, ECM
ChemorepulsionSemaphorins, SlitsGrowth cone retracts from inappropriate pathsNon-target tissue
Contact inhibitionMAG, Nogo, OMgp (myelin proteins)Growth cone stallsMyelin debris (if not cleared)

Regeneration process:

  1. Proximal stump sealing (0-24 hours) - calcium influx triggers membrane sealing at injury site
  2. Growth cone formation (24-72 hours) - multiple sprouts emerge from proximal stump (up to 20-50 initially)
  3. Endoneurial tube entry (3-7 days) - sprouts that successfully enter endoneurial tubes advance, others retract
  4. Elongation (weeks to months) - growth cone extends at 1-3mm per day along band of Büngner guidance
  5. Target contact (months) - growth cone reaches target (muscle, skin receptor), forms synapse
  6. Maturation (months to years) - axon diameter increases, Schwann cells remyelinate, conduction velocity improves

Rate-limiting factors:

  • Distance - proximal injuries (brachial plexus, sciatic nerve) require months-years for growth cone to reach distal targets
  • Age - regeneration rate declines with age (1-3mm/day in youth, slower in elderly)
  • Gap distance - gaps greater than 3-5mm require nerve grafting; tension-free repair critical
  • Denervation time - muscle fibers and Schwann cells atrophy if denervation exceeds 12-18 months

Tinel Sign

Advancing Tinel sign indicates regeneration front. Percussion over the nerve produces tingling distal to percussion site. The point of maximal Tinel advances 1mm per day distally, indicating growth cone progression. Stationary Tinel suggests neuroma (failed regeneration).

Factors Affecting Nerve Regeneration

Success of nerve regeneration depends on patient, injury, and surgical factors. Understanding these allows surgeons to optimize repair technique and set realistic expectations.

Patient Factors

Patient Factors

FactorEffect on RegenerationMechanism
AgeYounger better than olderDecreased growth factor expression, slower Schwann cell response with age
DiabetesImpaired regenerationMicroangiopathy, neuropathy, decreased neurotrophic support
SmokingDelayed regenerationVasoconstriction, tissue hypoxia, impaired Schwann cell function
Nutritional statusProtein and B vitamins essentialAxonal protein synthesis requires amino acids, B vitamins for myelin
Systemic diseaseCancer, renal failure, immunosuppressionImpaired cellular metabolism, healing, growth factor signaling

Age is the most important patient factor. Children regenerate faster and achieve better functional outcomes than adults. Elderly patients have slower regeneration and poorer outcomes even with optimal repair.

These patient factors are mostly non-modifiable, emphasizing importance of technique.

Injury Factors

Injury Characteristics

FactorBetter PrognosisWorse Prognosis
MechanismSharp laceration (clean)Crush, avulsion, ischemia (zone of injury)
LevelDistal injury (shorter distance)Proximal injury (longer distance, more time)
Nerve typePure motor or sensoryMixed nerve (misdirection risk)
Sunderland degreeI-II (endoneurium intact)III-V (structural disruption)
Associated injuriesIsolated nerve injuryVascular injury, soft tissue loss, fracture

Sharp lacerations (glass, knife) have best outcomes because zone of injury is minimal and primary repair can be performed immediately. Crush and avulsion injuries have zone of ischemia and structural damage extending beyond visible injury, requiring debridement and often grafting.

Proximal injuries (brachial plexus, high median nerve) have poor outcomes because regeneration distance is long. Even at 1mm per day, reaching hand muscles takes 1-2 years, by which time muscle atrophy is irreversible.

Injury factors guide surgical decision-making about repair versus reconstruction.

Surgical Factors

Surgical Technique Factors

FactorOptimal TechniqueResult if Suboptimal
TimingPrimary repair within 3 monthsDelayed beyond 6 months: poor motor recovery
TensionTension-free repairGap strain over 10%: failure, neuroma
AlignmentFascicular matching (epineurial or group)Mismatch: misdirection, poor recovery
Gap managementDirect repair if gap under 3cm, graft if largerExcessive tension or large gap without graft: neuroma
DebridementMinimal healthy nerve resectionInadequate debridement: neuroma from scarred nerve ends
Suture techniqueEpineurial or grouped fascicularExcessive sutures, tension, trauma: scar formation

Timing of repair:

  • Immediate primary repair (0-24 hours) for clean sharp lacerations only
  • Delayed primary repair (2-7 days) for most injuries after swelling resolves
  • Secondary repair (weeks to 3 months) after wound healing in contaminated or severe injuries
  • Late repair (beyond 3 months) has progressively worse outcomes; motor recovery unlikely beyond 12-18 months

Tension-free repair is critical. Tension over 10% gap strain causes ischemia at repair site, fibrosis, and failure. Nerve grafting (sural nerve autograft or allograft) required for gaps over 3-5cm or when mobilization insufficient.

Fascicular alignment improves outcomes in mixed nerves. Motor and sensory fascicles should be matched when possible using anatomical landmarks, nerve stimulation, or nerve action potentials. Mismatch causes motor axons growing to sensory targets (useless).

These surgical factors are modifiable and determine success or failure.

Critical surgical windows: Motor reinnervation must occur within 18-24 months or motor endplates degenerate. Sensory recovery can occur even after years but is less functional. This is why proximal nerve injuries in adults have poor prognosis - regeneration distance too great to reach muscle in time.

Investigations

Electrodiagnostic Studies

Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) Findings

ParameterNeurapraxiaAxonotmesis/NeurotmesisTiming
Motor amplitude distal to injuryNormalReduced or absentWait 7-10 days for Wallerian degeneration
Sensory amplitude distal to injuryNormalReduced or absentWait 10-14 days for sensory axon degeneration
Conduction block at injury sitePresentMay be present earlyPerform across lesion stimulation
Conduction velocityMay be slowed at injury siteCannot measure if absent responseFocal slowing suggests demyelination

EMG Findings

Timing: Wait 3-4 weeks post-injury

Denervation potentials:

  • Fibrillation potentials (spontaneous)
  • Positive sharp waves
  • Present in axonotmesis/neurotmesis
  • Absent in neurapraxia

Motor unit changes:

  • Reduced recruitment initially
  • Large polyphasic units with reinnervation

Clinical Purpose

Differentiate injury types:

  • Neurapraxia: Normal NCS distal, conduction block at lesion
  • Axonal injury: Absent/reduced distal responses

Prognosis and timing:

  • Baseline at 3-4 weeks
  • Follow-up at 3-month intervals
  • Nascent units indicate reinnervation

Exam Viva Point: Why Wait 3 Weeks for EMG?

Wallerian degeneration takes 7-14 days to complete.

  • Before this, NCS may still show normal distal responses even with complete transection
  • Denervation potentials (fibrillations) appear at 2-3 weeks as muscle becomes hypersensitive
  • Early EMG may miss axonal injury and lead to incorrect neurapraxia diagnosis
  • Exception: Intraoperative nerve action potential (NAP) testing during surgery

Advanced Investigations

Imaging Modalities for Nerve Injury

ModalityIndicationsFindingsLimitations
High-resolution ultrasoundAccessible nerves, identify continuityNeuroma-in-continuity, nerve swelling, gapsOperator dependent, limited in deep nerves
MRI neurographyBrachial plexus, deep nervesT2 hyperintensity (denervation), nerve discontinuityExpensive, less available, motion artifact
CT myelographyRoot avulsions (brachial plexus)Pseudomeningoceles indicate avulsionInvasive, radiation exposure

Intraoperative Nerve Assessment

Nerve Action Potentials (NAP)

Intraoperative recording across lesion:

  • NAP present: Axons conducting, observe
  • NAP absent: No conduction, requires repair/grafting

Technique:

  • Stimulate proximal to lesion
  • Record distal to lesion
  • Requires 5000+ conducting axons for signal

Nerve Stimulation

Motor stimulation distal to injury:

  • Response present: Some axons intact distally
  • Valid only within 72 hours (before Wallerian degeneration)

Proximal stimulation with distal recording:

  • Confirms lesion level
  • Guides surgical exploration extent

Electrodiagnostic Timeline

Serial EMG/NCS Interpretation

TimingExpected FindingsClinical Significance
0-7 daysNormal distal NCS even in complete lesionWallerian degeneration incomplete, do not rely on results
3-4 weeksDenervation potentials appear, reduced distal amplitudesBaseline assessment, confirms axonal injury if abnormal
3 monthsNascent motor unit potentials if reinnervatingSigns of recovery, continue observation if improving
6 monthsIncreased recruitment if recovering, persistent denervation if notDecision point for late surgical exploration

Exam Viva Point: Electrodiagnostic Decision-Making

When EMG/NCS guides surgery:

  • No clinical or electrical recovery by 3-4 months: Explore and repair
  • Nascent units at 3 months: Continue observation
  • Progressive Tinel sign: Regeneration occurring
  • Stationary Tinel: Neuroma-in-continuity, likely needs resection and grafting

Intraoperative NAP determines whether to resect neuroma-in-continuity or perform external neurolysis only.

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Nerve Injury Regeneration
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Nerve Injury RegenerationCredit: OrthoVellum

Management Overview

Management by Injury Type

Injury TypeInitial ManagementSurgical IndicationExpected Outcome
NeurapraxiaObserve, splinting, physiotherapyNone (spontaneous recovery)Complete recovery in weeks to months
Axonotmesis (closed)Observe 3 months, serial EMGSurgery if no recovery by 3-4 monthsGood recovery if endoneurium intact
Sharp transectionUrgent exploration and primary repairImmediate surgical repairVariable, depends on level and timing
Crush/avulsionDelayed exploration after wound healingSecondary repair 2-6 weeksWorse than sharp injury

Non-Operative Management

Neurapraxia and closed axonotmesis:

  • Splinting to prevent contractures
  • Physiotherapy for joint mobility
  • Serial clinical examination (Tinel sign)
  • EMG at 3-4 weeks baseline, 3 months follow-up

Observation period:

  • Advancing Tinel sign indicates recovery
  • Nascent motor unit potentials on EMG
  • Clinical recovery appropriate for regeneration distance

Indications for Surgery

Absolute indications:

  • Open injury with nerve discontinuity
  • Progressive neurological deficit
  • Associated vascular injury requiring exploration

Relative indications:

  • No clinical/EMG recovery by 3-4 months
  • Stationary Tinel sign
  • Neuroma-in-continuity on imaging

Exam Viva Point: The 3-Month Rule

Why wait 3 months for closed nerve injuries?

  • Allows time for neurapraxia to recover (demyelination resolves)
  • Allows axonotmesis to show regeneration signs (advancing Tinel)
  • EMG can document nascent units indicating reinnervation
  • Beyond 3 months, delays compromise outcomes due to Schwann cell band deterioration
  • Exception: Open injuries with known transection - repair immediately

Surgical Options

Nerve Repair Techniques

TechniqueIndicationAdvantagesDisadvantages
Primary neurorrhaphyClean transection, gap less than 3cmDirect coaptation, no graft morbidityRisk of tension, limited gap management
Nerve grafting (autograft)Gap greater than 3cm, tension with direct repairGold standard, vascularized living tissueDonor site morbidity, graft survival concerns
Nerve allograftGap greater than 3cm, avoid donor morbidityNo donor morbidity, off-the-shelfRequires immunosuppression or decellularized
Nerve conduitSmall gaps less than 3cm, sensory nervesNo donor morbidity, simplePoor for motor or long gaps
Nerve transferProximal lesion, long regeneration distanceBypasses long regeneration, faster reinnervationSacrifices donor nerve function

Timing of Surgical Intervention

Surgical Timing Algorithm

0-72 hours

Immediate primary repair for clean sharp lacerations with visible nerve transection. Best outcomes. Minimal debridement needed.

1-2 weeks

Delayed primary repair after wound stabilization for contaminated or complex wounds. Zone of injury still identifiable.

3-12 weeks

Secondary repair after wound healing. May need nerve grafting if contraction causes gap. Schwann cells still viable.

3-6 months

Late repair has declining outcomes. Consider nerve transfer for proximal injuries to shorten regeneration distance.

Over 6 months

Very late repair - motor recovery unlikely. Sensory recovery may occur. Consider reconstruction (tendon transfers) instead.

Nerve Transfer Principles

When to consider nerve transfer:

  • Proximal nerve injury (brachial plexus, high sciatic)
  • Time to target exceeds 18 months
  • Root avulsion (no proximal stump)

Examples:

  • Oberlin transfer: Ulnar fascicle to biceps motor branch
  • Spinal accessory to suprascapular
  • Radial nerve branches to axillary

Reconstruction Options

When nerve repair not viable:

  • Tendon transfers for motor function
  • Arthrodesis for joint stability
  • Free functioning muscle transfer
  • Sensory substitution procedures

Timing: Can be performed late, not time-dependent like nerve regeneration

Exam Viva Point: Tension-Free Repair

Why tension matters:

  • Tension greater than 10% gap strain causes ischemia at repair site
  • Leads to fibrosis and repair failure
  • Blood supply enters nerve segmentally - tension disrupts intrinsic circulation

Rule: If cannot achieve tension-free repair, use nerve graft. Never compromise repair with tension.

Surgical Technique

Primary Nerve Repair (Neurorrhaphy)

Repair Techniques

TechniqueDescriptionIndicationsAdvantages
Epineurial repairSutures through epineurium onlyMost common, mixed nervesSimple, minimal intraneural trauma
Group fascicular repairSutures through perineurium of fascicle groupsLarge nerves with distinct groupsBetter alignment, more precise
Fascicular repairIndividual fascicle coaptationPure motor/sensory nervesMost precise but most trauma

Surgical Principles

Key steps:

  1. Adequate exposure with proximal and distal mobilization
  2. Identify healthy nerve tissue (bulb resection)
  3. Align fascicular patterns (vessels, epineurial landmarks)
  4. Tension-free coaptation
  5. Minimal sutures (4-6 for digital, 8-12 for major nerve)

Instruments: Operating microscope or loupes, microsurgical instruments, 8-0 to 10-0 nylon

Technical Tips

Ensure success:

  • Rotate nerve to inspect entire circumference
  • Match surface blood vessels for orientation
  • Place sutures 1-2mm apart
  • Avoid crushing nerve with forceps
  • Fibrin glue can supplement suture repair

Positioning: 90 degrees coaptation, slight flexion of adjacent joints if needed

Exam Viva Point: Epineurial vs Fascicular Repair

Epineurial repair is preferred for most injuries:

  • Less intraneural dissection trauma
  • Faster surgery
  • Similar outcomes in mixed nerves

Fascicular repair reserved for:

  • Pure motor nerves (anterior interosseous)
  • Large nerves with distinct motor/sensory groups (median at wrist)
  • Need to match specific fascicles

Nerve Grafting Technique

Nerve Graft Options

Graft TypeSourceMax LengthAdvantagesDisadvantages
Sural nerve autograftPosterior leg30-40 cmGold standard, living tissue, vascularizedSensory loss lateral foot, donor scar
Medial antebrachial cutaneousMedial forearm15-20 cmSame field surgery for upper limbSensory loss medial forearm
Lateral antebrachial cutaneousLateral forearm8-10 cmSmall caliber for digital nervesLimited length
Processed nerve allograftCadavericVariableNo donor morbidity, off-the-shelfCost, immunogenicity concerns

Grafting Principles

Cable Grafting

For large nerves requiring graft:

  • Multiple sural nerve cables placed in parallel
  • Match cross-sectional area of recipient nerve
  • Each cable 3-4mm diameter (sural)
  • Coaptation at each end with 9-0 or 10-0 sutures

Rule: Graft diameter should not exceed recipient fascicle/nerve diameter

Graft Revascularization

Graft survival depends on:

  • Vascularized bed (not over bare tendon/bone)
  • Graft diameter (thin better than thick)
  • Graft length (shorter better)

Timeline: Central necrosis if graft greater than 5mm diameter. Revascularization from periphery takes 3-7 days.

Nerve Transfer Techniques

Common Nerve Transfers

Recipient (Target)Donor NerveFunction RestoredDonor Deficit
Musculocutaneous (biceps)Ulnar fascicle (Oberlin)Elbow flexionMinimal FCU weakness
Suprascapular nerveSpinal accessory nerveShoulder abduction/ERPossible trapezius weakness
Axillary nerveRadial nerve branches (triceps)Shoulder abductionMinimal triceps weakness
Anterior interosseous (pronator quadratus)Brachialis branchThumb/index FDPNo deficit (expendable)

Nerve transfer timing: Should be performed within 6 months for optimal outcomes. Unlike nerve grafting which depends on regeneration distance, transfers are placed close to target muscle - faster reinnervation.

Intraoperative Assessment

Neuroma-in-Continuity

Decision-making:

  1. Expose neuroma completely
  2. Perform intraoperative NAP across lesion
  3. NAP present: External neurolysis only
  4. NAP absent: Resect and graft

Do not resect conducting neuroma - will worsen outcome

Fascicular Identification

For mixed nerve repair:

  • Awake nerve stimulation (preoperative)
  • Intraoperative stimulation with direct muscle observation
  • Histochemical staining (choline acetyltransferase for motor)
  • Anatomical landmarks (internal topography maps)

Exam Viva Point: When to Graft vs Transfer

Choose grafting when:

  • Distal injury (short regeneration distance)
  • Clean transection with defined gap
  • Young patient with time for regeneration

Choose transfer when:

  • Proximal injury (long regeneration distance)
  • Root avulsion (no proximal stump for grafting)
  • Late presentation where regeneration time exceeded
  • Priority function restoration (elbow flexion, shoulder stability)

Complications

Complications of Nerve Injury

Complications by Category

ComplicationCausePreventionTreatment
Neuroma formationMisdirected axonal sproutingTension-free repair, good fascicular alignmentNeuroma resection and grafting
Failed regenerationLate repair, poor technique, elderlyEarly repair, microsurgical techniqueNerve transfer, tendon transfer
Motor misdirectionMotor axons entering sensory fasciclesFascicular matching, intraoperative NAPOften irreversible, consider tendon transfer
Joint contractureProlonged immobilization, muscle imbalanceSplinting, physiotherapy during recoveryTendon lengthening, capsular release

Neuroma

Painful neuroma:

  • Disordered axonal sprouting at injury site
  • Tapping causes severe lancinating pain
  • Forms at amputation stumps, failed repairs

Prevention:

  • Tension-free repair
  • Cover nerve ends in vascularized tissue
  • Buried relocation for amputation neuromas

Neuropathic Pain

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS):

  • Can follow any nerve injury
  • Burning pain, allodynia, autonomic changes

Management:

  • Early mobilization and desensitization
  • Mirror therapy, TENS
  • Medications: gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine
  • Multidisciplinary pain management

Exam Viva Point: Neuroma-in-Continuity

Key concept: A neuroma-in-continuity may conduct or not conduct.

  • Conducting neuroma: Some axons passing through, NAP positive. External neurolysis only.
  • Non-conducting neuroma: Complete block, NAP absent. Resect and graft.

Never resect a conducting neuroma - will worsen outcome by destroying regenerating axons.

Complications of Nerve Repair

Surgical Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Repair site failure5-15%Tension, infection, poor vascularityRevision with nerve graft
Graft failure10-20%Large diameter, avascular bed, long graftRevision with vascularized graft or transfer
Donor site morbidityVariableSural: sensory loss, painful neuromaAccept sensory loss, treat neuroma if symptomatic
InfectionRareContaminated wound, foreign bodyDebridement, antibiotics, delayed repair

Long-Term Sequelae

Incomplete Motor Recovery

Expected even with optimal repair:

  • Proximal injuries: M3-M4 typically (useful function)
  • Distal injuries: M4-M5 achievable
  • Intrinsic muscle recovery rare after high injuries

Factors:

  • Age (children better)
  • Level (distal better)
  • Timing (early better)

Sensory Dysfunction

Common sensory outcomes:

  • Protective sensation usually recovers
  • Fine discriminative sensation often impaired
  • Cold intolerance common

Two-point discrimination:

  • Normal: less than 6mm
  • Functional: 6-12mm
  • Protective: greater than 12mm

Muscle and Joint Complications

Secondary Musculoskeletal Problems

ProblemMechanismPreventionTreatment
Muscle atrophyDenervation fibrofatty change after 18-24 monthsEarly repair, physiotherapyIrreversible if prolonged denervation
Joint contractureMuscle imbalance, immobilizationSplinting, passive ROMSerial casting, surgical release
Tendon adhesionsScarring around tendons in zone of injuryEarly protected motionTenolysis if necessary
OsteoporosisDisuse from weaknessEncourage weight bearingUsually improves with function

Irreversible complications: Motor endplates degenerate after 18-24 months of denervation. Even perfect nerve regeneration cannot restore muscle function if endplates are gone. This biological clock drives urgency for nerve repair.

Exam Viva Point: Managing Failed Nerve Repair

Options when nerve repair fails:

  1. Revision nerve surgery: If early (under 6 months), may revise with graft
  2. Nerve transfer: If motor endplates still viable
  3. Tendon transfer: Time-independent, reliable
  4. Arthrodesis: For joint stability (wrist, shoulder)
  5. Free functioning muscle transfer: If no local motors available

Key: Always have a reconstruction plan if nerve regeneration fails.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Rehabilitation Timeline After Nerve Repair

0-3 weeks

Protection phase: Splint in position of repair (slight flexion to reduce tension). No active motion across repair. Wound care and edema control.

3-6 weeks

Gentle mobilization: Gradual increase in ROM. Wean from splint during day. Continue night splint. Begin scar management.

6-12 weeks

Progressive motion: Full ROM as tolerated. Strengthening begins when reinnervation evident. Sensory re-education starts when protective sensation returns.

3-12 months

Reinnervation and strengthening: Motor recovery progresses. Strengthening intensifies. Functional training for activities of daily living.

Splinting

Purpose:

  • Protect repair from tension
  • Prevent joint contracture
  • Position hand of function

Duration:

  • Rigid splint: 3 weeks
  • Removable splint: 3-6 weeks
  • Night splint: Until reinnervation

Therapy Goals

Early phase (0-6 weeks):

  • Edema control
  • Scar management
  • Passive ROM of uninvolved joints
  • Desensitization if hypersensitive

Later phase (6+ weeks):

  • Active ROM
  • Strengthening when motor returns
  • Sensory re-education

Exam Viva Point: Sensory Re-education

Why sensory re-education is necessary:

  • Regenerating axons may reach different receptors than original
  • Cortical representation must reorganize
  • Begin when protective sensation returns (4.31 monofilament)
  • Techniques: texture identification, localization training

Without re-education, sensory recovery is suboptimal even with good regeneration.

Monitoring Recovery

Clinical Assessment During Recovery

AssessmentTimingSignificanceExpected Findings
Tinel sign progressionMonthlyIndicates regeneration front locationShould advance 1mm per day (1 inch per month)
Motor examinationMonthlyEarliest sign of reinnervationFlicker, then grade 2-3, then strengthens
Sensory testingMonthlyRecovery proximal to distalProtective first, then discriminative
EMG/NCS3-6 monthsNascent units confirm reinnervationPolyphasic potentials with reduced recruitment

Therapy Techniques

Motor Re-education

Biofeedback techniques:

  • EMG biofeedback for weak muscles
  • Mirror therapy for cortical reorganization
  • Electrical stimulation (controversial efficacy)

Strengthening progression:

  • Isometric when flicker present
  • Isotonic against gravity when M3
  • Resistance training when M4

Sensory Re-education

Early phase (when protective sensation returns):

  • Constant touch localization
  • Moving touch identification
  • Texture grading exercises

Late phase (when discriminative sensation improving):

  • Object recognition
  • Functional activity training
  • Adaptive techniques if incomplete recovery

Managing Complications During Recovery

Common Issues and Management

IssueRecognitionManagement
Cold intolerancePainful sensitivity to coldProtective gloves, gradual desensitization
HypersensitivityPainful response to light touchDesensitization: textures, vibration, graded stimuli
Joint stiffnessReduced passive ROMIntensive stretching, serial casting, consider release
Neuropathic painBurning, lancinating painGabapentin/pregabalin, TENS, pain clinic referral

Realistic expectations: Full recovery is uncommon after nerve repair. Counsel patients that:

  • Motor recovery typically M3-M4 (useful but not normal)
  • Sensory recovery often protective only
  • Cold intolerance is permanent in many patients
  • Recovery takes 12-24 months and requires consistent therapy participation

Exam Viva Point: When Recovery Stalls

If no clinical improvement by 3-4 months post-repair:

  1. Repeat EMG looking for nascent units
  2. If no electrical evidence of reinnervation, consider revision exploration
  3. Intraoperative NAP testing to assess repair integrity
  4. If repair failed, revise with nerve graft or consider nerve transfer

Don't wait too long - motor endplate viability is time-limited.

Outcomes

Motor Recovery Grading

Medical Research Council (MRC) Motor Grading After Nerve Repair

GradeDescriptionClinical Significance
M0No contractionComplete denervation
M1Flicker of contractionEarly reinnervation beginning
M2Contraction with gravity eliminatedReinnervation progressing
M3Contraction against gravityUseful recovery achieved
M4Contraction against resistanceGood recovery
M5Normal powerExcellent recovery (uncommon after repair)

Sensory Recovery Grading

MRC Sensory Grading

GradeDescriptionFunctional Implication
S0No sensationComplete sensory loss
S1Deep pain onlyMinimal protective sensation
S2Some superficial pain and touchProtective sensation developing
S3Touch and pain, no overreactionFunctional protective sensation
S3+Good localization, some 2PDUseful discriminative function
S4Normal two-point discriminationRare after repair

Expected Outcomes by Level

Distal injuries (wrist, hand):

  • Motor: M4-M5 achievable
  • Sensory: S3+ common

Proximal injuries (arm, plexus):

  • Motor: M3-M4 typical
  • Sensory: S3 often best achieved
  • Intrinsic muscle recovery rare

Prognostic Factors

Better outcomes:

  • Young age (children best)
  • Distal injury level
  • Sharp mechanism
  • Early repair (under 3 months)
  • Pure sensory or motor nerve

Worse outcomes:

  • Elderly
  • Proximal injury
  • Crush/avulsion
  • Delayed repair
  • Mixed nerve (misdirection)

Exam Viva Point: Realistic Outcome Expectations

What to tell patients:

  • Motor recovery: Expect M3-M4 (useful but not normal strength)
  • Sensory recovery: Expect protective sensation, discriminative function limited
  • Cold intolerance: Common and often permanent
  • Time to recovery: 12-24 months depending on level
  • Full normal function: Uncommon after nerve repair

Outcome Data by Nerve

Expected Outcomes After Primary Repair

NerveLevelMotor Recovery (M3+)Sensory Recovery (S3+)
Digital nerveFingerN/A (pure sensory)70-90%
Median nerveWrist70-80%60-70%
Median nerveElbow50-60%50-60%
Ulnar nerveWrist60-70%60-70%
Ulnar nerveElbow40-50%50-60%
Radial nerveArm60-70%70-80%
Brachial plexusTrunk level30-50%50-60%

Timing Impact on Outcomes

Nerve Graft Outcomes

Compared to primary repair:

  • Generally 10-20% lower success rates
  • Depends on graft length (shorter better)
  • Cable grafts for larger nerves

Autograft vs allograft:

  • Autograft: Gold standard, 60-70% good outcome
  • Processed allograft: Similar for gaps under 3cm
  • Longer gaps: Autograft preferred

Nerve Transfer Outcomes

Advantages over graft for proximal injuries:

  • Faster reinnervation (close to target)
  • Bypasses damaged proximal pathway
  • Works even for root avulsion

Success rates:

  • Oberlin (elbow flexion): 80-90% M4+
  • Spinal accessory to suprascapular: 70-80%
  • Requires intact donor nerve

Long-Term Functional Outcomes

Patient-Reported Outcomes

DomainFindingClinical Implication
Return to work60-80% return to same jobLighter duties may be needed initially
Activities of daily livingMost achieve independenceMay need adaptive techniques
Pain30-40% have chronic discomfortCold intolerance most common
Quality of lifeModerate improvement with recoveryCorrelation with sensory and motor outcomes

Evidence limitations: Most nerve repair outcome studies are retrospective case series with variable follow-up. High-quality RCTs are lacking. Outcomes vary significantly based on surgeon experience and patient selection.

Exam Viva Point: Outcome Measurement

Standardized outcome measures:

  • Motor: MRC grading (M0-M5)
  • Sensory: MRC sensory grading, Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, two-point discrimination
  • Functional: DASH (upper limb), SF-36 (general quality of life)
  • Return to work: Days until return, type of work

Know the MRC grading system - examiners commonly test this.

Evidence Base

Wallerian Degeneration Molecular Mechanisms

Basic Science Review
Vargas ME, Barres BA • Neuroscientist (2007)
Key Findings:
  • c-Jun in Schwann cells is essential for Wallerian degeneration and subsequent nerve regeneration
  • Knockout models fail to clear debris and regenerate poorly
  • Calcium-mediated calpain activation drives axonal breakdown
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Schwann Cell Dedifferentiation and Bands of Büngner

Basic Science Review
Jessen KR, Mirsky R • Glia (2016)
Key Findings:
  • Denervated Schwann cells maintain bands of Büngner for several months
  • Gradually lose pro-regenerative phenotype if no axon contact
  • Underlies time-dependent success of nerve repair
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Nerve Injury Classification Outcomes

Historical Landmark
Seddon HJ • Brain (1943)
Key Findings:
  • Classification based on functional prognosis rather than anatomical detail
  • Neurapraxia recovers completely, axonotmesis recovers well
  • Neurotmesis requires surgery with poor outcomes even with repair
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Timing of Nerve Repair - Clinical Outcomes

Cohort Study
Rosberg HE, Carlsson KS, Dahlin LB • J Hand Surg Eur (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Primary repair within 3 months superior to delayed repair
  • Motor recovery unlikely if reinnervation not achieved within 18 months
  • Distal injuries have better outcomes than proximal injuries
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Growth Cone Guidance Mechanisms

Basic Science Review
Gordon T, Tyreman N, Raji MA • Exp Neurol (2011)
Key Findings:
  • Balance of attractive (NGF, BDNF, laminin) and repulsive (semaphorins, MAG) cues determines regeneration success
  • Clearance of myelin debris essential to remove inhibitory signals
  • Growth cone receptors respond to multiple guidance molecules
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Basic Science Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Scenario 1: Wallerian Degeneration Process

EXAMINER

"The examiner asks: Describe the process of Wallerian degeneration. What is its purpose and what is the timeline?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Wallerian degeneration is the active breakdown of axon and myelin distal to a nerve injury site. It was described by Augustus Waller in 1850. The process begins within 24-48 hours of injury. The distal axon fragments into ellipsoids, myelin breaks down, and Schwann cells dedifferentiate and proliferate. Schwann cells and recruited macrophages phagocytose the debris over 1-2 weeks. The purpose is to clear myelin debris which contains growth-inhibitory molecules like MAG, and to convert Schwann cells into a pro-regenerative state. Schwann cells then form bands of Büngner within the endoneurial tubes, secreting neurotrophic factors and creating a permissive scaffold for axonal regeneration. Without Wallerian degeneration, regeneration cannot occur.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Define Wallerian degeneration as distal axon and myelin breakdown
Timeline: starts 24-48 hours, debris cleared by 1-2 weeks
Purpose: remove inhibitory myelin, create pro-regenerative Schwann cells
Schwann cells form bands of Büngner guiding regeneration
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting it is an active process requiring Schwann cells and macrophages (not passive decay)
✗Not mentioning bands of Büngner formation
✗Confusing with retrograde degeneration (which is limited, 3-5mm proximal)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the role of c-Jun in Schwann cells? (Master regulator of dedifferentiation and pro-regenerative phenotype)"
"What happens if myelin debris is not cleared? (Inhibitory molecules MAG, Nogo block regeneration)"
"How long can Schwann cell bands persist without axonal contact? (3-4 months before deterioration)"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Seddon and Sunderland Classifications

EXAMINER

"The examiner shows you a diagram and asks: Compare the Seddon and Sunderland nerve injury classifications. Which do you prefer clinically and why?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Seddon described three types in 1943 based on functional prognosis: neurapraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis. Neurapraxia is a local conduction block with intact axon, recovers completely in weeks to months. Axonotmesis is axonal disruption with intact endoneurial tubes, undergoes Wallerian degeneration but regenerates well at 1mm per day. Neurotmesis is complete transection requiring surgical repair. Sunderland in 1951 described five degrees based on anatomical structures: degree I is neurapraxia, degree II is axonotmesis with intact endoneurium, degrees III and IV are progressive disruption of endoneurium and perineurium, degree V is neurotmesis. I prefer Seddon clinically because it directly predicts prognosis and guides management. Sunderland adds anatomical detail useful for research but the distinction between degrees III and IV is difficult to make clinically. Both classifications emphasize that preservation of endoneurial tubes is critical for good regeneration outcomes.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Seddon: neurapraxia, axonotmesis, neurotmesis (functional classification)
Sunderland: degrees I-V (anatomical detail based on structures injured)
Seddon preferred clinically for simplicity and direct prognostic value
Key concept: endoneurial tube integrity determines regeneration quality
COMMON TRAPS
✗Getting confused about which Sunderland degrees equal which Seddon types
✗Not explaining why endoneurial tubes matter (bands of Büngner guidance)
✗Failing to state a clinical preference (examiners want decision-making)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you differentiate neurapraxia from axonotmesis clinically? (Electrodiagnostics: conduction block vs Wallerian changes)"
"What is Mackinnon grade VI? (Mixed injury with different fascicles at different Sunderland degrees)"
"What determines whether an axonotmesis injury needs surgery? (If Sunderland III-IV with endoneurial disruption causing misdirection)"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Timing and Outcomes of Nerve Repair

EXAMINER

"A patient presents with a radial nerve laceration at the spiral groove from a humeral fracture 8 months ago. The nerve was not repaired. What are the chances of motor recovery if you repair it now? What biological factors limit recovery?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a difficult scenario. The injury occurred 8 months ago at the spiral groove, which is approximately 20-25cm proximal to the wrist extensors and 30-35cm to the intrinsic hand muscles. At a regeneration rate of 1mm per day, it would take an additional 8-12 months for axons to reach the wrist extensors and even longer for hand muscles. This means total denervation time would be 16-20 months for wrist extensors and over 24 months for intrinsic muscles. Motor endplates degenerate after 18-24 months of denervation, after which muscle reinnervation is not possible even if axons arrive. Additionally, the denervated Schwann cells will have lost their bands of Büngner structure after 3-4 months, reducing guidance quality. Therefore, the chance of meaningful motor recovery is very low. I would counsel the patient that surgery may restore some sensation (which can recover even late) but motor function is unlikely. Tendon transfers would be more reliable for restoring wrist and finger extension. The biological factors limiting recovery are: irreversible muscle atrophy after 18-24 months denervation, loss of Schwann cell bands after 3-4 months, and the long regeneration distance exceeding the viable reinnervation window.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Calculate regeneration distance and time: 20-35cm at 1mm/day equals 8-12 months additional
Total denervation time would exceed 18-24 month motor endplate viability
Schwann cell bands deteriorate after 3-4 months denervation
Recommend tendon transfers over late nerve repair for motor function
COMMON TRAPS
✗Being overly optimistic about late nerve repair outcomes
✗Not calculating the regeneration distance and timeline
✗Forgetting that sensory recovery can occur even late (different from motor)
✗Not offering alternative reconstruction (tendon transfers)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Would nerve grafting help in this case? (No, the limiting factor is time/distance, not gap)"
"What if this was a digital nerve laceration at the same 8-month timeframe? (Much better prognosis, shorter distance)"
"What are the options for restoring wrist extension? (Tendon transfer: pronator teres to ECRB, FCR to EDC)"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Seddon classification of nerve injuries?

A: Three grades of increasing severity: (1) Neurapraxia: Conduction block without axonal damage, focal demyelination, complete recovery in weeks to months. (2) Axonotmesis: Axon disrupted but endoneurial tubes intact, Wallerian degeneration occurs, regeneration along intact tubes, good recovery. (3) Neurotmesis: Complete nerve transection including endoneurium, no spontaneous recovery, requires surgical repair.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Sunderland classification and how does it relate to Seddon?

A: Five grades: Grade I = Neurapraxia (conduction block). Grade II = Axonotmesis (axon damage, endoneurium intact). Grade III = Endoneurium damaged, perineurium intact. Grade IV = Only epineurium intact. Grade V = Neurotmesis (complete transection). Grades III-V require surgical intervention. Sunderland provides more granular prognosis than Seddon.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the rate of nerve regeneration and what factors influence it?

A: Regeneration rate: approximately 1mm/day (or 1 inch/month). Factors affecting regeneration: (1) Age (younger = better). (2) Level of injury (proximal = worse due to longer regeneration distance). (3) Delay to repair (earlier = better). (4) Type of injury (sharp transection better than crush/avulsion). (5) Gap length (tension-free repair preferred).

Exam Pearl

Q: What is Wallerian degeneration?

A: Distal to injury, the axon and myelin sheath degenerate (occurs within 48-72 hours). Schwann cells proliferate, phagocytose debris, and form Bands of Büngner (tubes guiding regenerating axons). Macrophages clear myelin debris. The cell body undergoes chromatolysis (swelling, nucleus displacement). Wallerian degeneration is prerequisite for regeneration in axonotmesis/neurotmesis.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the indications for surgical exploration of a peripheral nerve injury?

A: (1) Sharp transection injuries: Explore and repair within 72 hours (primary repair). (2) No clinical or EMG recovery by 3-4 months: Suggests Sunderland Grade III-V injury. (3) Open fracture with nerve deficit: Early exploration. (4) Closed injury with complete deficit: Observe initially, explore if no recovery by 3 months. (5) Advancing Tinel sign not present at expected time: Suggests failed regeneration.

Australian Context

Training and Referral Pathways

Specialist Referral

Hand surgeons and peripheral nerve specialists:

  • Australian Hand Surgery Society (AHSS) members
  • Plastic surgeons with hand/nerve training
  • Orthopaedic hand surgeons

Tertiary referral centres:

  • Major metropolitan hospitals with microsurgery capability
  • Brachial plexus injuries: Specialized units in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane

Training Requirements

Exam relevance:

  • Nerve injury biology: Basic Science Viva topic
  • Seddon/Sunderland classification: Core knowledge
  • Wallerian degeneration: High-yield concept
  • Surgical timing principles: Clinical decision-making

RACS training: Hand surgery rotation exposure

Medicare and Funding

Relevant MBS Item Numbers

ItemDescriptionRelevance
30023Nerve repair, primaryDirect neurorrhaphy
30024Nerve repair with graftCable grafting
30026Nerve transferOberlin, spinal accessory transfers
30111Tendon transfer, complexReconstruction after failed nerve recovery

Exam Relevance

Basic Science Viva expectations:

  • Define Seddon and Sunderland classifications
  • Explain Wallerian degeneration timeline and purpose
  • Describe chromatolysis and its significance
  • Outline bands of Büngner formation
  • State regeneration rate (1mm per day)
  • Discuss factors affecting regeneration outcomes

Australian Healthcare Context

Trauma System Integration

Nerve injury in trauma context:

  • Associated with limb trauma, fractures
  • Identified in trauma bay assessment
  • Documentation of neurological status pre-reduction

Referral pathway:

  • Regional → Tertiary if microsurgery needed
  • Hand clinic follow-up for closed injuries
  • Urgent plastic surgery for open transections

Rehabilitation Services

Hand therapy access:

  • Public hospital outpatient services
  • Private hand therapists (AHTA accredited)
  • Splinting and sensory re-education specialists

Funding:

  • Medicare chronic disease management
  • WorkCover for occupational injuries
  • NDIS for long-term disability needs

Brachial Plexus Injury Management

Australian Brachial Plexus Units

CentreLocationServices
Austin HealthMelbourneComprehensive plexus reconstruction, nerve transfer
Royal North Shore HospitalSydneyPlexus and peripheral nerve unit
Princess Alexandra HospitalBrisbaneComplex upper limb reconstruction

Evidence and Guidelines

Australian Guidelines

No specific national guidelines for nerve repair timing.

Generally accepted practice:

  • Primary repair within 72 hours for sharp transections
  • Observe closed injuries 3 months
  • Exploration if no recovery by 3-4 months
  • Late reconstruction options discussed early

Research Contributions

Australian contributions:

  • Microsurgery training programs
  • Outcome studies from major centres
  • Nerve transfer technique refinements

RACS SET curriculum:

  • Nerve injury classification and biology
  • Principles of repair and reconstruction
  • Timing of intervention

Rural and remote considerations: Limited access to microsurgical expertise. Early identification and transfer to tertiary centre critical. Splinting and wound care can be initiated locally while awaiting transfer.

Exam Viva Point: Practical Australian Context

When asked about nerve injury management in Australia:

  • Know the 3-month observation rule for closed injuries
  • Understand referral pathways to hand surgery or plastic surgery
  • Recognize limited access in rural areas requiring transfer
  • Be aware that brachial plexus injuries need specialized tertiary centres
  • Hand therapy is essential and should be arranged early

NERVE INJURY AND REGENERATION

High-Yield Exam Summary

Seddon Classification

  • •Neurapraxia: myelin injury only, axon intact, full recovery weeks-months, no Wallerian degeneration
  • •Axonotmesis: axon disrupted, endoneurium intact, Wallerian degeneration distal, regenerates 1mm/day, good prognosis
  • •Neurotmesis: complete transection all structures, requires surgical repair, poor outcomes even with repair

Sunderland Degrees

  • •Degree I: neurapraxia (myelin only)
  • •Degree II: axon disrupted, endoneurium intact (good regeneration)
  • •Degree III: endoneurium disrupted, perineurium intact (variable, may need surgery)
  • •Degree IV: perineurium disrupted, epineurium intact (poor without surgery)
  • •Degree V: complete transection (requires repair)

Wallerian Degeneration

  • •Distal axon and myelin breakdown starting 24-48 hours post-injury
  • •Schwann cells and macrophages phagocytose debris over 1-2 weeks
  • •Purpose: clear inhibitory myelin (MAG), create pro-regenerative Schwann cells
  • •Schwann cells form bands of Büngner (tubular scaffolds) secreting NGF, BDNF, GDNF
  • •c-Jun transcription factor is master regulator of Schwann cell dedifferentiation

Chromatolysis

  • •Cell body response to axonal injury, peaks 7-14 days
  • •Nissl substance disperses, nucleus eccentric, cell swells 30-50%
  • •Switch from neurotransmission to regeneration gene expression
  • •Upregulate GAP-43, tubulin, actin for growth cone extension
  • •Prolonged chromatolysis beyond 3-4 weeks without regeneration leads to neuronal apoptosis

Growth Cone and Regeneration

  • •Growth cone forms at proximal axon tip within 24-72 hours
  • •Filopodia and lamellipodia sense chemical gradients and ECM cues
  • •Regeneration rate: 1-3mm per day (average 1mm/day clinically)
  • •Guidance: chemoattraction (NGF, BDNF), contact attraction (laminin), chemorepulsion (semaphorins)
  • •Tinel sign advances 1mm/day indicating regeneration front

Schwann Cell Functions

  • •Debris clearance: phagocytose 40-50% of myelin debris, recruit macrophages
  • •Bands of Büngner: form tubular guidance channels for regenerating axons
  • •Neurotrophic support: secrete NGF, BDNF, GDNF creating chemical gradient
  • •Remyelination: wrap regenerated axons (shorter internodes, thinner myelin than original)
  • •Time limit: bands persist 3-4 months then deteriorate if no axon contact

Factors Affecting Regeneration

  • •Patient: younger better, diabetes/smoking impair regeneration
  • •Injury: distal better than proximal, sharp better than crush, shorter better
  • •Timing: primary repair within 3 months optimal, motor recovery unlikely after 18-24 months denervation
  • •Technique: tension-free repair critical (strain under 10%), fascicular alignment for mixed nerves
  • •Gap management: direct repair if gap under 3cm, nerve graft if larger

Critical Timelines

  • •24-48 hours: Wallerian degeneration begins
  • •7-14 days: Peak chromatolysis
  • •1-2 weeks: Debris clearance complete, bands of Büngner formed
  • •3-4 months: Schwann cell bands begin to deteriorate without axon
  • •12-18 months: Muscle atrophy becomes irreversible
  • •18-24 months: Motor endplate degeneration, no recovery possible

References

Key Research Articles

  1. Waller A. Experiments on the section of the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves of the frog, and observations of the alterations produced thereby in the structure of their primitive fibres. Phil Trans R Soc Lond. 1850;140:423-429. doi:10.1098/rstl.1850.0021

  2. Seddon HJ. Three types of nerve injury. Brain. 1943;66(4):237-288. doi:10.1093/brain/66.4.237

  3. Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951;74(4):491-516. doi:10.1093/brain/74.4.491

  4. Vargas ME, Barres BA. Why is Wallerian degeneration in the CNS so slow? Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:153-179. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094354

  5. Jessen KR, Mirsky R. The repair Schwann cell and its function in regenerating nerves. J Physiol. 2016;594(13):3521-3531. doi:10.1113/JP270874

  6. Arthur-Farraj PJ, Latouche M, Wilton DK, et al. c-Jun reprograms Schwann cells of injured nerves to generate a repair cell essential for regeneration. Neuron. 2012;75(4):633-647. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.021

  7. Gordon T, Tyreman N, Raji MA. The basis for diminished functional recovery after delayed peripheral nerve repair. J Neurosci. 2011;31(14):5325-5334. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6156-10.2011

  8. Fu SY, Gordon T. The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 1997;14(1-2):67-116. doi:10.1007/BF02740621

  9. Rosberg HE, Carlsson KS, Höjgård S, et al. Injury to the human median and ulnar nerves in the forearm - analysis of costs for treatment and rehabilitation of 69 patients in southern Sweden. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(1):35-39. doi:10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.09.003

  10. Brushart TM. Nerve Repair. Oxford University Press. 2011. (Comprehensive textbook on peripheral nerve biology and repair)

  11. Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(3):391-414. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.4165

  12. Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Peripheral nerve injury and repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(4):243-252. doi:10.5435/00124635-200007000-00005

  13. Boyd JG, Gordon T. Neurotrophic factors and their receptors in axonal regeneration and functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2003;27(3):277-324. doi:10.1385/MN:27:3:277

  14. Griffin JW, Thompson WJ. Biology and pathology of nonmyelinating Schwann cells. Glia. 2008;56(14):1518-1531. doi:10.1002/glia.20778

  15. Scheib J, Höke A. Advances in peripheral nerve regeneration. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(12):668-676. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.227

Australian Context

  1. Jaquet JB, Luijsterburg AJ, Kalmijn S, et al. Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity. J Trauma. 2001;51(4):687-692. doi:10.1097/00005373-200110000-00011

  2. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2024 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2024. (For context on surgical outcomes research standards)

Suggested Reading

  1. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. Thieme Medical Publishers. 1988. (Classic text on peripheral nerve surgery)

  2. Spinner RJ, Kline DG. Surgery for peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries or other nerve lesions. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23(5):680-695. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(200005)23:5

  3. Terenghi G. Peripheral nerve regeneration and neurotrophic factors. J Anat. 1999;194(Pt 1):1-14. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19410001.x

Quick Stats
Reading Time220 min
Related Topics

Articular Cartilage Structure and Function

Bending Moment Distribution in Fracture Fixation

Biceps Femoris Short Head Anatomy

Biofilm Formation in Orthopaedic Infections