Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Neurofibroma

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Neurofibroma

Benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising from Schwann cells, fibroblasts, and perineural cells - associated with neurofibromatosis type 1

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

NEUROFIBROMA

Benign Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor | NF1 Association | MPNST Risk

90%S100 positive on immunohistochemistry
50%NF1-associated plexiform type
8-13%lifetime MPNST risk in NF1
Less than 1%sporadic neurofibroma malignant transformation

Anatomical Classification

Localized (Solitary)
PatternSingle lesion, not NF1-associated
TreatmentSimple excision if symptomatic
Diffuse
PatternPlaque-like, skin and subcutaneous
TreatmentWide excision, high recurrence 20-40%
Plexiform
PatternBag of worms, pathognomonic for NF1
TreatmentObservation vs debulking, MPNST surveillance

Critical Must-Knows

  • Neurofibroma consists of Schwann cells, fibroblasts, and perineural cells in myxoid matrix
  • Plexiform neurofibromas are pathognomonic for NF1 and have 8-13% lifetime MPNST risk
  • Histology shows wavy nuclei, myxoid stroma, and diffuse S100 positivity without Antoni patterns
  • Rapid growth, pain, neurological deficit suggest malignant transformation to MPNST
  • Localized neurofibromas can be excised; plexiform require careful surveillance

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Distinguish from schwannoma: neurofibroma cannot be separated from nerve, Schwann cell plus fibroblast mix
  • "
    Plexiform neurofibroma creates bag of worms appearance, virtually diagnostic of NF1
  • "
    MPNST arises in 8-13% of plexiform neurofibromas, heralded by pain and rapid growth
  • "
    Complete excision of localized neurofibroma requires sacrificing nerve fascicles

Critical Neurofibroma Exam Points

Malignant Transformation

Plexiform neurofibromas in NF1 have 8-13% lifetime MPNST risk. Red flags: rapid growth, pain, neurological deficit, size over 5cm. PET-CT and MRI with contrast help detect transformation.

NF1 Association

Plexiform neurofibromas are pathognomonic for NF1. Multiple cutaneous neurofibromas also suggest NF1. Screen for cafe-au-lait spots, axillary freckling, Lisch nodules, family history.

Histological Features

Wavy nuclei in myxoid matrix with diffuse S100 positivity. Mixed Schwann cells and fibroblasts (unlike pure Schwann cell schwannoma). No Antoni A/B patterns or Verocay bodies.

Surgical Principles

Localized: simple excision with nerve sacrifice. Plexiform: observation or debulking for symptoms. Cannot separate from nerve (unlike schwannoma). High recurrence in diffuse type (20-40%).

Mnemonic

NERVENeurofibroma Key Features

N
NF1 association
Plexiform type pathognomonic for neurofibromatosis type 1
E
Embedded in nerve
Cannot be separated from nerve (vs schwannoma which shells out)
R
Rope-like plexiform
Bag of worms appearance along nerve distribution
V
Variable S100 staining
Diffuse but patchy S100 positivity (Schwann cells plus fibroblasts)
E
Eight to thirteen percent MPNST
Lifetime malignant transformation risk in plexiform type

Memory Hook:NERVE tumors: Neurofibroma embedded in nerve with NF1 association and MPNST risk!

Mnemonic

WAVYHistological Triad

W
Wavy nuclei
Serpentine, buckled nuclei characteristic of Schwann cells
A
Admixed cell types
Schwann cells plus fibroblasts plus perineural cells (not pure)
V
Vague borders
Poorly circumscribed, infiltrative growth pattern
Y
Yielding myxoid matrix
Abundant myxoid stroma with fine collagen fibers

Memory Hook:WAVY nuclei in myxoid matrix with admixed cells - hallmark of neurofibroma!

Mnemonic

RAPIDMPNST Red Flags

R
Rapid growth
Growth over weeks to months in previously stable lesion
A
Aching pain
New onset pain in previously painless neurofibroma
P
Positron uptake on PET
SUV over 3.5 suggests malignancy
I
Irregular margins
Loss of circumscription, infiltrative borders on MRI
D
Deficit neurological
Progressive motor or sensory deficit

Memory Hook:RAPID changes in neurofibroma require urgent MPNST workup!

Overview and Epidemiology

Neurofibroma is a benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising from a mixture of Schwann cells, fibroblasts, and perineural cells within a myxoid stromal matrix. It represents approximately 5% of all benign soft tissue tumors. The tumor occurs in three distinct clinical forms: localized (solitary), diffuse, and plexiform, each with different associations, behavior, and treatment implications.

Clinical Significance

Neurofibromas are clinically important because: (1) plexiform neurofibromas are virtually pathognomonic for NF1; (2) they have significant malignant transformation risk to MPNST in NF1 patients (8-13% lifetime risk); (3) unlike schwannomas, they cannot be separated from parent nerve requiring nerve sacrifice; and (4) diffuse cutaneous neurofibromas cause significant morbidity and disfigurement.

Demographics

  • Age: Solitary type 20-40 years; NF1-associated from childhood
  • Sex: Equal male to female distribution
  • Location: Any nerve; plexiform favors large nerves and plexuses
  • NF1: 50% of plexiform, less than 5% of solitary

Clinical Forms

  • Localized (Solitary): Single lesion, not NF1-associated (90%)
  • Diffuse: Plaque-like skin lesions, young adults
  • Plexiform: Multiple fascicles, bag of worms, pathognomonic NF1
  • Multiple cutaneous: Suggests NF1 diagnosis

Pathophysiology and Molecular Biology

Cellular Origin and Composition

Neurofibromas arise from the peripheral nerve sheath and consist of a heterogeneous cell population including Schwann cells, fibroblasts, perineural-like cells, and mast cells embedded within a myxoid collagenous matrix. This mixed cellular composition distinguishes neurofibromas from schwannomas, which contain only Schwann cells.

NF1 and Malignant Transformation

Patients with NF1 have germline mutations in the NF1 tumor suppressor gene (chromosome 17q11.2) encoding neurofibromin, a RAS-GTPase activating protein. Loss of neurofibromin leads to constitutive RAS activation. Plexiform neurofibromas in NF1 have 8-13% lifetime risk of malignant transformation to MPNST, particularly with additional mutations in TP53 and CDKN2A/B.

Neurofibroma vs Schwannoma Cellular Composition

FeatureNeurofibromaSchwannoma
Cell typesSchwann cells plus fibroblasts plus perineural cellsPure Schwann cells
Separation from nerveCannot be separated (intrinsic)Can be dissected free (eccentric)
S100 patternDiffuse but patchy (50-90% cells)Uniform strong (100% cells)
CapsulePoorly defined, infiltrativeWell-defined capsule
Antoni patternsAbsentPresent (Antoni A and B areas)
Verocay bodiesAbsentPresent in Antoni A areas
NF associationPlexiform type pathognomonic for NF1NF2 association (bilateral vestibular schwannomas)

Molecular Pathogenesis

NF1 Gene and Pathway

  • Gene: NF1 on chromosome 17q11.2
  • Protein: Neurofibromin (RAS-GAP)
  • Function: Inactivates RAS signaling
  • Loss: Constitutive RAS-MAPK activation

MPNST Transformation

  • First hit: Germline NF1 mutation (inherited)
  • Second hit: Somatic NF1 loss of heterozygosity
  • Additional: TP53, CDKN2A/B, SUZ12 mutations
  • Result: Progression to high-grade sarcoma

Classification and Clinical Types

Neurofibroma Clinical Types

TypeClinical FeaturesNF1 AssociationLocationMalignant RiskTreatment
Localized (Solitary)Single nodule, skin or nerve, painlessRare (less than 5%)Any peripheral nerve, dermisLess than 1%Excision if symptomatic
DiffusePlaque-like, skin thickeningOccasional (10-20%)Head/neck, trunkLess than 5%Wide excision, high recurrence (20-40%)
PlexiformBag of worms, multiple fasciclesPathognomonic (100% if present)Large nerves and plexuses8-13% lifetimeObservation, debulking for symptoms, MPNST surveillance

Localized (Solitary) Neurofibroma

Localized neurofibromas present as single, slowly growing, painless nodules typically in young to middle-aged adults (20-40 years). They arise within the dermis (cutaneous) or along peripheral nerves (intraneural). Most are sporadic without NF1 association.

Clinical Features:

  • Soft, mobile subcutaneous or dermal nodule
  • Skin lesions may have buttonhole sign (invagination with pressure)
  • Painless unless compressing adjacent structures
  • Size typically 1-3cm
  • Do not transilluminate (unlike schwannomas which may)

Diffuse Neurofibroma

Diffuse neurofibromas present as poorly defined, plaque-like thickenings of skin and subcutaneous tissue. They typically occur in children and young adults, often involving the head, neck, or trunk. They have infiltrative growth pattern making complete excision difficult.

Clinical Features:

  • Ill-defined, soft tissue swelling
  • Skin thickening with loss of normal texture
  • May cause hypertrophy of underlying tissues
  • Hyperpigmentation common
  • Disfiguring lesions

Plexiform Neurofibroma

Plexiform neurofibromas are pathognomonic for NF1 when present. They involve multiple nerve fascicles along the length of a nerve or plexus, creating a characteristic bag of worms appearance. They are typically congenital or develop in early childhood.

Clinical Features:

  • Rope-like or bag of worms masses
  • Palpable along nerve distribution
  • May cause limb overgrowth and elephantiasis
  • Can involve deeper structures (mediastinum, retroperitoneum)
  • Often associated with overlying hyperpigmented skin

Pathognomonic Sign

The presence of a plexiform neurofibroma is virtually diagnostic of NF1. If you identify a bag of worms mass involving multiple nerve fascicles, NF1 should be strongly suspected and the patient evaluated for other diagnostic criteria including cafe-au-lait spots, axillary/groin freckling, Lisch nodules, and family history.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

History

Typical Presentation

  • Solitary: Painless subcutaneous nodule, incidental finding
  • Plexiform: Congenital or childhood mass, family history NF1
  • Symptoms: Usually asymptomatic unless compressive
  • Growth: Slow, stable (rapid growth suggests MPNST)

Red Flag Symptoms

  • Pain: New onset or worsening (suggests MPNST)
  • Rapid growth: Size increase over weeks to months
  • Neurological deficit: Motor weakness or sensory loss
  • Systemic: Weight loss, fatigue (advanced MPNST)

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Size, location, overlying skin changes
  • Multiple lesions suggest NF1
  • Cafe-au-lait spots (6 or more over 5mm prepubertal, over 15mm postpubertal)
  • Axillary or inguinal freckling (Crowe sign)
  • Lisch nodules on slit lamp examination (iris hamartomas)

Palpation:

  • Soft, non-tender mass (tenderness suggests MPNST)
  • Buttonhole sign: cutaneous neurofibroma invaginates with pressure
  • Bag of worms: multiple nodules along nerve (plexiform type)
  • Cannot be separated from nerve (unlike schwannoma)
  • Tinel sign may be present but less prominent than schwannoma

Special Tests:

  • Assess motor and sensory function of affected nerve
  • Document any neurological deficits
  • Measure limb circumference if hypertrophy present

NF1 Diagnostic Criteria

A patient is diagnosed with NF1 if they have 2 or more of the following:

  1. Six or more cafe-au-lait spots: over 5mm prepubertal or over 15mm postpubertal
  2. Two or more neurofibromas of any type or one plexiform neurofibroma
  3. Axillary or inguinal freckling
  4. Optic glioma
  5. Two or more Lisch nodules (iris hamartomas)
  6. Distinctive osseous lesion: sphenoid dysplasia, tibial pseudarthrosis, or bowing
  7. First-degree relative with NF1 by above criteria

Investigations and Imaging

Laboratory Tests

Routine:

  • Complete blood count: baseline (usually normal)
  • Basic metabolic panel: preoperative assessment
  • Genetic testing: NF1 gene sequencing if clinical diagnosis uncertain

Histopathology:

  • Core needle biopsy for deep lesions over 5cm
  • Excisional biopsy for accessible superficial lesions
  • Immunohistochemistry: S100 to confirm nerve sheath origin

Biopsy Considerations

Biopsy of suspected plexiform neurofibromas should be performed carefully as they are highly vascular and may bleed significantly. Image-guided core needle biopsy is preferred over open biopsy for deep lesions. Always consider MPNST in the differential for atypical or rapidly growing lesions.

Imaging Studies

Imaging Modalities for Neurofibroma

ModalityFindingsIndicationLimitations
MRI (T1-weighted)Isointense to muscle, well-definedLesion characterization, MPNST surveillanceCannot reliably distinguish benign from malignant
MRI (T2-weighted)Hyperintense, target sign (central low signal)Best for anatomical delineationTarget sign only in 50% of cases
MRI with contrastVariable enhancement; MPNST shows heterogeneous uptakeDifferentiate from MPNSTSome benign neurofibromas also enhance
PET-CTSUV less than 2.5 benign; over 3.5 suggests MPNSTMPNST surveillance in high-risk patientsFalse positives with inflammation
UltrasoundHypoechoic, well-defined, posterior enhancementSuperficial lesion assessment, biopsy guidanceLimited for deep or large lesions

MRI Target Sign:

  • Central hypointensity on T2-weighted images
  • Corresponds to fibrous tissue and collagen
  • Peripheral hyperintensity from myxoid matrix
  • Seen in approximately 50% of neurofibromas
  • Not pathognomonic but suggestive

Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

Macroscopic Appearance:

  • Poorly circumscribed, fusiform expansion of nerve
  • Cannot be separated from nerve fascicles
  • Cut surface: grey-white, gelatinous, mucoid
  • Plexiform type: multiple nodules like bag of worms

Microscopic Features:

Histological Features

FeatureDescriptionClinical Significance
Wavy nucleiSerpentine, buckled nuclei characteristic of Schwann cellsClassic feature shared with schwannoma
Mixed cellularitySchwann cells plus fibroblasts plus perineural cells plus mast cellsDistinguishes from pure Schwann cell schwannoma
Myxoid matrixAbundant loose myxoid stroma with fine collagen fibersCreates soft consistency clinically
No Antoni patternsAbsent Antoni A (compact) and Antoni B (loose) areasDifferentiates from schwannoma
No Verocay bodiesAbsent nuclear palisading structuresFurther evidence against schwannoma
Poorly circumscribedInfiltrative growth into surrounding tissuesCannot achieve clean surgical margins

Immunohistochemistry:

  • S100 protein: Positive in 50-90% of cells (patchy, not diffuse like schwannoma)
  • CD34: Positive in fibroblast component
  • EMA (epithelial membrane antigen): Highlights perineural cells
  • Neurofilament: Positive in entrapped axons
  • Ki-67: Low proliferation index (less than 5%); high in MPNST (over 10%)

Histological Diagnosis

The diagnosis of neurofibroma requires recognition of wavy nuclei in myxoid matrix with mixed Schwann cells and fibroblasts, diffuse (but patchy) S100 positivity, and absence of Antoni patterns or Verocay bodies. If these features are atypical or show high cellularity, increased mitoses, or necrosis, consider MPNST.

Differential Diagnosis

Differential Diagnosis of Neurofibroma

ConditionClinical CluesHistologyImagingS100 Staining
SchwannomaEccentric, can be shelled out, Tinel signPure Schwann cells, Antoni A/B, Verocay bodiesTarget sign on MRI, cystic degeneration commonDiffuse uniform 100% positive
MPNSTRapid growth, pain, neurological deficit, NF1High cellularity, mitoses over 4 per 10 HPF, necrosisHeterogeneous, irregular margins, SUV over 3.5Variable 50-70%, focal
PerineuriomaYoung adults, superficial nerves, painlessPerineurial cells, whorled patternTarget sign similar to neurofibromaNegative; EMA positive
LipomaSoft, mobile, no Tinel signMature adipocytes without atypiaFat signal on MRI, suppresses on fat satNegative
Ganglion cystTransilluminates, fluctuant, joint-associatedMucin-filled cyst without epithelial liningHomogeneous T2 hyperintense, no enhancementNegative
Desmoid tumorFirm, fixed, young adults, trauma historyFibroblastic proliferation, infiltrativeT2 heterogeneous, low to intermediate signalNegative; beta-catenin positive

Do Not Miss MPNST

The most critical differential diagnosis is distinguishing benign neurofibroma from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Red flags include: (1) rapid growth; (2) pain or neurological deficit; (3) size over 5cm; (4) heterogeneous enhancement on MRI; (5) PET SUV over 3.5; (6) histology showing high cellularity, mitoses, or necrosis. If any red flags present, urgent referral to sarcoma center is mandatory.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
neurofibroma management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for neurofibromaCredit: OrthoVellum

Treatment Algorithm

Initial Assessment
  • Confirm diagnosis: clinical examination and imaging
  • Determine type: localized, diffuse, or plexiform
  • Screen for NF1 if plexiform or multiple lesions
  • Assess symptoms: pain, neurological deficit, cosmetic concern

Initial assessment establishes treatment pathway.

Risk Stratification
  • Low risk: Solitary, asymptomatic, stable size, no NF1
  • Intermediate risk: Diffuse type, cosmetic concern, no NF1
  • High risk: Plexiform with NF1, size over 5cm, rapid growth, pain

Risk guides surveillance intensity.

Management Decision
  • Observation: Asymptomatic solitary neurofibroma, stable plexiform
  • Surgical excision: Symptomatic, cosmetic concern, diagnostic uncertainty
  • MPNST surveillance: High-risk plexiform in NF1 (annual MRI, PET)

Treatment individualized to patient needs.

Treatment by Neurofibroma Type

TypeFirst-Line TreatmentSurgical ApproachRecurrence RiskFollow-Up
Localized (Solitary)Observation if asymptomatic; excision if symptomaticSimple excision with nerve sacrifice of involved fasciclesLess than 5%None if completely excised
DiffuseWide excision if symptomatic or cosmetic concernWide excision with margin, may need reconstruction20-40% (infiltrative growth)Clinical surveillance for recurrence
Plexiform (NF1)Observation; debulking only if compressive symptomsSubtotal resection preserving nerve functionVariable (incomplete excision expected)Annual MRI and PET-CT for MPNST surveillance

Conservative Management

Indications for Observation:

  • Asymptomatic localized neurofibroma
  • Stable plexiform neurofibroma in NF1 patient
  • No evidence of malignant transformation
  • Small lesions (less than 3cm) without functional impact

Surveillance Protocol for High-Risk Patients (NF1 with Plexiform):

  • Clinical examination every 6-12 months
  • Baseline MRI with contrast at diagnosis
  • Annual MRI for lesions over 3cm or symptomatic
  • PET-CT if concern for MPNST (SUV over 3.5 suspicious)
  • Patient education on red flag symptoms: pain, rapid growth, deficit

Surgical Management

Indications for Surgery

Absolute Indications:

  • Suspected malignant transformation (MPNST)
  • Progressive neurological deficit
  • Severe pain unresponsive to conservative measures
  • Diagnostic uncertainty (rule out malignancy)

Relative Indications:

  • Symptomatic compression of adjacent structures
  • Cosmetic disfigurement causing psychological distress
  • Functional impairment (limited range of motion, daily activities)
  • Patient preference for asymptomatic but growing lesion

Contraindications:

  • Medical comorbidities precluding surgery
  • Extensive plexiform neurofibroma where resection would cause severe deficit
  • Multiple small asymptomatic lesions in NF1

Surgical decision-making balances symptom relief against risk of neurological deficit from nerve sacrifice.

Surgical Technique

Preoperative Planning:

  • MRI to define anatomical extent and nerve involved
  • Consent patient for nerve sacrifice and resultant deficit
  • Mark skin incision along nerve course
  • Consider nerve monitoring if attempting nerve preservation

Localized Neurofibroma Excision:

  1. Incision and Exposure:

    • Longitudinal incision along nerve course
    • Identify and protect proximal and distal normal nerve
    • Isolate neurofibroma within expanded nerve segment
  2. Tumor Assessment:

    • Assess whether tumor can be separated from nerve (unlikely)
    • If intraneural: plan for fascicular sacrifice
    • Document preoperative motor and sensory function
  3. Resection:

    • Cannot shell out like schwannoma (tumor intrinsic to nerve)
    • Sacrifice involved fascicles or entire nerve if diffuse involvement
    • Preserve uninvolved fascicles if possible (rare in practice)
    • Achieve marginal margins (not wide margins as benign tumor)
  4. Nerve Reconstruction:

    • Consider nerve graft if critical motor nerve and long gap
    • Interposition graft (sural nerve) for gaps over 2cm
    • Direct repair only if minimal tension
    • Most sensory nerves do not require reconstruction
  5. Closure:

    • Hemostasis (neurofibromas can be vascular)
    • Layered closure without tension
    • Drain only if extensive dissection

Plexiform Neurofibroma Debulking:

  • Goal is symptom relief, not cure (complete resection impossible)
  • Debulk tumor mass while preserving nerve function
  • Subtotal resection accepted to minimize deficit
  • High recurrence expected due to incomplete margins

Diffuse Neurofibroma Excision:

  • Wide excision with margin (tumor infiltrative)
  • May require skin grafting or flap reconstruction
  • Accept positive deep margins if over critical structures
  • Recurrence 20-40% due to infiltrative growth

This concludes the surgical technique description.

Reconstruction Considerations

Nerve Deficits:

  • Document expected deficits: motor weakness, sensory loss, neuropathic pain
  • Occupational therapy for hand dysfunction
  • Splinting for motor deficits (wrist drop, foot drop)
  • Gabapentin or pregabalin for neuropathic pain

Soft Tissue Defects:

  • Primary closure if minimal undermining required
  • Skin graft for shallow defects without exposed critical structures
  • Local flaps for moderate defects (rotation, advancement)
  • Free tissue transfer for large defects or exposed neurovascular structures

Functional Rehabilitation:

  • Early mobilization to prevent stiffness
  • Desensitization for hypersensitive scars
  • Strengthening exercises once healed
  • Neuropsychological support for patients with NF1 and disfigurement

Reconstruction planning is essential for optimal functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Novel and Emerging Therapies

MEK Inhibitors (Selumetinib)

  • Indication: Progressive symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas in NF1 children
  • Mechanism: Inhibits MEK in RAS-MAPK pathway
  • Efficacy: 70% partial response, tumor volume reduction
  • FDA approval: 2020 for pediatric NF1 plexiform

Future Therapies

  • mTOR inhibitors: Sirolimus trials for plexiform neurofibromas
  • HDAC inhibitors: Epigenetic modulation trials
  • Immunotherapy: PD-1 inhibitors for MPNST
  • Gene therapy: NF1 gene replacement (preclinical)

Complications and Prognosis

Complications of Neurofibroma

Complications by Type

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Malignant transformation (MPNST)8-13% lifetime in NF1 plexiform; less than 1% sporadicNF1, plexiform type, size over 5cm, radiationUrgent referral to sarcoma center, wide excision with adjuvant therapy
Recurrence after excisionLess than 5% localized; 20-40% diffuse; variable plexiformIncomplete excision, diffuse or plexiform typeRe-excision if symptomatic, surveillance if asymptomatic
Neurological deficitExpected with nerve sacrifice; 10-20% plexiform debulkingIntraneural location, sacrifice of motor fasciclesRehabilitation, splinting, gabapentin for pain
Disfigurement and psychosocial impactCommon in multiple cutaneous and plexiform NF1Visible location, multiple lesions, NF1Psychological support, selective excision, MEK inhibitors
Surgical complicationsBleeding 5%, infection less than 5%, wound dehiscence rareVascular plexiform lesions, poor wound healingStandard surgical techniques, meticulous hemostasis

Prognosis

Localized (Solitary) Neurofibroma:

  • Excellent prognosis with complete excision
  • Recurrence less than 5% if marginal margins achieved
  • No malignant transformation risk in non-NF1 patients
  • No systemic surveillance required

Diffuse Neurofibroma:

  • Good overall prognosis but high local recurrence (20-40%)
  • Infiltrative growth makes complete excision difficult
  • Low malignant transformation risk (less than 5%)
  • Clinical surveillance for recurrence recommended

Plexiform Neurofibroma in NF1:

  • 8-13% lifetime risk of MPNST transformation
  • Cannot be completely excised without major neurological deficit
  • Require lifelong MPNST surveillance (annual MRI and PET-CT)
  • MEK inhibitors may reduce tumor burden and symptoms
  • Overall survival excellent if MPNST detected early

Evidence Base and Key Studies

WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone

Expert Consensus
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board • 5th Edition (2020)
Key Findings:
  • Neurofibroma classified into localized, diffuse, and plexiform subtypes
  • Plexiform neurofibroma pathognomonic for NF1 when present
  • 8-13% lifetime MPNST transformation risk in NF1 plexiform neurofibromas
  • Histology: wavy nuclei, myxoid matrix, mixed Schwann cells and fibroblasts, patchy S100
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Selumetinib for Plexiform Neurofibromas in NF1

Level II (Prospective Cohort)
Gross AM, Wolters PL, et al. • New England Journal of Medicine (2020)
Key Findings:
  • 50 children with NF1 and progressive plexiform neurofibromas treated with selumetinib
  • 70% achieved partial response with median 27.9% tumor volume reduction
  • Improvement in pain and functional outcomes in responders
  • FDA approved selumetinib for pediatric NF1 plexiform neurofibromas in 2020
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

MPNST Risk in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Level III (Cohort Study)
Evans DG, Baser ME, et al. • American Journal of Medical Genetics (2002)
Key Findings:
  • Lifetime MPNST risk 8-13% in NF1 patients with plexiform neurofibromas
  • Median age of MPNST diagnosis 26-30 years
  • 5-year survival for MPNST approximately 35-50%
  • Radiation exposure increases MPNST risk in NF1 patients
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Neurofibroma vs Schwannoma Pathological Distinction

Level III (Retrospective Review)
Rodriguez FJ, Folpe AL, et al. • Modern Pathology (2012)
Key Findings:
  • Neurofibroma: mixed Schwann cells and fibroblasts, cannot be separated from nerve
  • Schwannoma: pure Schwann cells, Antoni A/B patterns, can be shelled out
  • S100 uniform in schwannoma (100%), patchy in neurofibroma (50-90%)
  • Accurate distinction essential for surgical planning (nerve sacrifice vs preservation)
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Solitary Neurofibroma Management

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old man presents with a 2cm painless mass in the volar forearm present for 3 years, slowly growing. Examination reveals a soft, non-tender subcutaneous nodule with a positive Tinel sign over the median nerve. MRI shows a well-defined T2 hyperintense lesion with target sign involving the median nerve. How would you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a solitary neurofibroma arising from the median nerve. I would take a systematic approach. First, I would obtain a detailed history including any family history of NF1, presence of cafe-au-lait spots, or multiple similar lesions suggesting NF1. I would perform a thorough examination to document motor and sensory function of the median nerve including thenar strength and two-point discrimination. Given the diagnosis is likely benign neurofibroma based on clinical and imaging findings, I would discuss two options: observation versus surgical excision. For an asymptomatic lesion, observation is reasonable. However, if the patient has symptoms such as pain, progressive growth, or desires removal for peace of mind, I would offer surgical excision. I would counsel that complete excision requires sacrificing the involved median nerve fascicles, which may result in sensory deficit or weakness depending on fascicular involvement. If surgery is chosen, I would perform excision via a volar approach to the median nerve, assess which fascicles are involved, and sacrifice only those fascicles if possible. The specimen would be sent for histopathological confirmation. I would arrange follow-up to monitor for recurrence, which is less than 5% for localized neurofibromas, and assess neurological function post-operatively.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize clinical and imaging features of solitary neurofibroma (target sign on MRI)
Screen for NF1 with history and examination (cafe-au-lait, multiple lesions, family history)
Offer observation versus excision; counsel nerve sacrifice required for complete excision
Document preoperative neurological function; expect deficits from fascicular sacrifice
Confirm diagnosis with histopathology; recurrence less than 5% for localized type
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming neurofibroma can be shelled out like schwannoma (it cannot - intraneural)
✗Failing to screen for NF1 in a young patient with nerve sheath tumor
✗Not counseling patient on expected neurological deficit from nerve sacrifice
✗Offering wide excision (inappropriate for benign lesion requiring only marginal margins)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you differentiate neurofibroma from schwannoma clinically and histologically?"
"What would change your management if this patient had 6 cafe-au-lait spots and a family history of NF1?"
"Describe the histological features you would expect on pathology for neurofibroma"
"What is the target sign on MRI and what is its significance?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Plexiform Neurofibroma with MPNST Concern

EXAMINER

"A 28-year-old woman with known NF1 presents with a plexiform neurofibroma in the left brachial plexus, present since childhood. Over the past 6 months, she reports rapid increase in size and new onset pain. MRI shows heterogeneous enhancement and the lesion has grown from 8cm to 12cm. PET-CT shows SUV of 4.2. How would you proceed?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a high-risk presentation for malignant transformation of plexiform neurofibroma to MPNST. The red flags are: (1) rapid growth over 6 months; (2) new onset pain in a previously painless lesion; (3) size over 5cm; (4) heterogeneous enhancement on MRI; and (5) PET SUV over 3.5 which is concerning for malignancy. My immediate priority is to confirm or exclude MPNST. I would arrange urgent referral to a sarcoma center for multidisciplinary team assessment including musculoskeletal oncology, radiology, and pathology. I would obtain image-guided core needle biopsy of the most metabolically active area on PET-CT to obtain tissue diagnosis while minimizing surgical morbidity. If biopsy confirms MPNST, staging would include CT chest for metastases. Treatment would be wide excision with oncologically appropriate margins, likely requiring nerve sacrifice and functional reconstruction, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. If margins are positive or the tumor is unresectable due to critical neurovascular involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered. MPNST in NF1 has poor prognosis with 5-year survival 35-50%, so early detection and treatment are critical. If biopsy shows benign neurofibroma, I would counsel that the clinical and radiological features remain concerning, and close surveillance with repeat imaging in 3 months would be warranted.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize red flags for MPNST: rapid growth, pain, size over 5cm, heterogeneous MRI, SUV over 3.5
Urgent referral to sarcoma center for MDT assessment
Image-guided biopsy of metabolically active area on PET-CT before definitive surgery
Wide excision with adjuvant radiotherapy if MPNST confirmed; accept nerve sacrifice for oncological margins
Poor prognosis for MPNST in NF1 (5-year survival 35-50%); emphasize early detection
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting excisional biopsy rather than core needle biopsy (risks contamination and compromises margins)
✗Missing any of the red flags for malignant transformation
✗Treating as benign neurofibroma without biopsy confirmation
✗Not involving sarcoma MDT early in the management pathway
✗Underestimating the aggressiveness of MPNST and poor prognosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the lifetime MPNST risk for a patient with NF1 and plexiform neurofibromas?"
"How would you counsel a patient with NF1 about MPNST surveillance?"
"What are the principles of wide excision for MPNST in the brachial plexus?"
"Describe the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in MPNST management"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 3: Multiple Neurofibromas - NF1 Diagnosis

EXAMINER

"A 22-year-old presents with multiple subcutaneous nodules on the trunk and extremities noticed over the past 5 years. She has no family history of similar lesions. Examination reveals over 20 soft, mobile, non-tender subcutaneous masses ranging from 0.5-3cm. You also note 8 cafe-au-lait spots over 15mm and axillary freckling. What is your diagnosis and management approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient meets diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). She has at least 2 of 7 criteria: (1) two or more neurofibromas (she has over 20); (2) six or more cafe-au-lait spots over 15mm post-pubertal (she has 8); and (3) axillary freckling. My initial management would involve: First, confirming the diagnosis of NF1 with genetic testing (NF1 gene sequencing) though clinical criteria are diagnostic. Second, screening for complications of NF1 including optic gliomas (ophthalmology referral with visual fields and slit lamp for Lisch nodules), skeletal abnormalities (long bone radiographs if symptomatic), cardiovascular screening (blood pressure, ECG), and neurological assessment. Third, I would educate the patient about NF1 inheritance (autosomal dominant, 50% risk to offspring), the lifetime MPNST risk of 8-13% if she develops plexiform neurofibromas, and red flag symptoms requiring urgent assessment: rapid growth of any lesion, new pain, neurological deficits. For the multiple cutaneous neurofibromas, I would offer observation unless cosmetically distressing or symptomatic. Selective excision can be performed for lesions causing symptoms or significant psychological distress, but complete removal of all lesions is impractical. I would arrange genetic counseling and establish long-term follow-up including annual clinical examination and imaging surveillance if plexiform neurofibromas develop.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnose NF1 based on clinical criteria (2 of 7 criteria present)
Screen for NF1 complications: optic glioma, skeletal dysplasia, cardiovascular, plexiform neurofibromas
Educate on inheritance pattern (autosomal dominant, 50% risk), MPNST risk, and red flags
Offer observation for multiple cutaneous neurofibromas; selective excision if symptomatic
Establish long-term surveillance plan and genetic counseling
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing NF1 diagnostic criteria despite classic presentation
✗Offering surgical excision of all lesions (impractical and unnecessary)
✗Failing to screen for other NF1 complications beyond cutaneous neurofibromas
✗Not counseling about inheritance and implications for family planning
✗Missing the need for MPNST surveillance if plexiform neurofibromas develop
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the 7 diagnostic criteria for NF1? How many must be present?"
"What is the inheritance pattern of NF1 and what is the gene mutation?"
"How do you differentiate cutaneous neurofibroma from dermatofibroma on examination?"
"What surveillance protocol would you implement if this patient developed a plexiform neurofibroma?"

Australian Context

Epidemiology in Australia

  • Neurofibromatosis type 1 incidence: approximately 1 in 2500-3000 births in Australia
  • No racial or ethnic predilection; equal distribution across populations
  • Specialized NF1 clinics exist in major tertiary centers (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane)

Healthcare System Considerations

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS):

  • Selumetinib (Koselugo): Not yet PBS-listed in Australia as of 2025
  • Available through Special Access Scheme for eligible NF1 patients with progressive plexiform neurofibromas
  • Cost approximately $20,000-30,000 per month without PBS subsidy

Specialist Referral Pathways:

  • GP referral to plastic surgery, orthopaedic oncology, or general surgery for solitary lesions
  • Tertiary NF1 clinic for patients with multiple neurofibromas or plexiform type
  • Sarcoma MDT referral for suspected MPNST (available in all major Australian cities)

Australian NF1 Guidelines

The Australian Neurofibromatosis Network recommends:

  • Annual clinical examination for all NF1 patients
  • MRI surveillance for plexiform neurofibromas over 3cm or symptomatic lesions
  • Urgent imaging and referral for red flag symptoms
  • Genetic counseling for all families affected by NF1
  • Multidisciplinary care coordination through specialized NF1 clinics

NEUROFIBROMA - Exam Day Summary

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Definitions

  • •Benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor from Schwann cells, fibroblasts, perineural cells in myxoid matrix
  • •Three types: Localized (solitary, sporadic), Diffuse (plaque-like), Plexiform (bag of worms, NF1)
  • •90% S100 positive; wavy nuclei; NO Antoni patterns or Verocay bodies (vs schwannoma)
  • •Cannot be separated from nerve (intraneural) - requires fascicular sacrifice for excision

NF1 Criteria (2 of 7 required)

  • •6 plus cafe-au-lait spots (over 5mm pre-puberty, over 15mm post-puberty)
  • •2 plus neurofibromas of any type OR 1 plexiform neurofibroma
  • •Axillary or inguinal freckling (Crowe sign)
  • •Optic glioma; 2 plus Lisch nodules; osseous lesion; 1st degree relative with NF1

MPNST Red Flags

  • •Rapid growth over weeks-months; New onset or worsening pain; Neurological deficit
  • •Size over 5cm; Heterogeneous MRI enhancement; PET SUV over 3.5
  • •High cellularity, mitoses over 4/10 HPF, necrosis on histology
  • •8-13% lifetime risk in NF1 plexiform; urgent sarcoma MDT referral

Imaging Pearls

  • •MRI target sign: Central T2 hypointense (fibrous), peripheral hyperintense (myxoid) - 50% cases
  • •T1 isointense to muscle; T2 hyperintense; variable enhancement
  • •PET-CT: SUV less than 2.5 benign; over 3.5 MPNST concern
  • •Plexiform: Bag of worms along nerve distribution on MRI

Treatment by Type

  • •Localized: Observation if asymptomatic; excision with nerve sacrifice if symptomatic (less than 5% recurrence)
  • •Diffuse: Wide excision if symptomatic; 20-40% recurrence (infiltrative growth)
  • •Plexiform NF1: Observation plus MPNST surveillance (annual MRI, PET); debulking only for compression
  • •MEK inhibitor (selumetinib) for progressive plexiform in NF1 children - 70% partial response

Histology vs Schwannoma

  • •Neurofibroma: Mixed Schwann plus fibroblasts; wavy nuclei; myxoid; patchy S100; NO Antoni/Verocay
  • •Schwannoma: Pure Schwann cells; Antoni A/B; Verocay bodies; uniform 100% S100
  • •Neurofibroma: Cannot shell out (intraneural); Schwannoma: Can be dissected free (eccentric)
  • •Both have wavy nuclei; differentiate by cellularity mix and Antoni patterns

Exam Traps to Avoid

  • •Assuming neurofibroma can be shelled out like schwannoma (WRONG - intraneural, needs nerve sacrifice)
  • •Missing NF1 diagnosis when plexiform or multiple lesions present
  • •Not screening for MPNST in NF1 plexiform (8-13% lifetime risk, needs annual surveillance)
  • •Offering wide excision for benign lesion (marginal margins adequate for localized type)

References

  1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2020.

  2. Ferner RE, Huson SM, Thomas N, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2007;44(2):81-88. doi:10.1136/jmg.2006.045906

  3. Gross AM, Wolters PL, Dombi E, et al. Selumetinib in children with inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1430-1442. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1912735

  4. Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2002;39(5):311-314. doi:10.1136/jmg.39.5.311

  5. Rodriguez FJ, Folpe AL, Giannini C, Perry A. Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(3):295-319. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-0954-z

  6. Xu GZ, Li YH, Zhao DP, et al. Comparison of dumbbell-shaped schwannomas and neurofibromas in the upper extremities. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151(6):653-661. doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0280-8

  7. Woodruff JM, Godwin TA, Erlandson RA, et al. Cellular schwannoma: a variety of schwannoma sometimes misinterpreted as a malignant tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 1981;5(8):733-744.

  8. Beert E, Brems H, Daniëls B, et al. Atypical neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1 are premalignant tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50(12):1021-1032. doi:10.1002/gcc.20921

  9. Mautner VF, Asuagbor FA, Dombi E, et al. Assessment of benign tumor burden by whole-body MRI in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Neuro Oncol. 2008;10(4):593-598. doi:10.1215/15228517-2008-011

  10. Salamon J, Veldhoen S, Apostolova I, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: tumour-to-liver ratio is superior to an SUVmax cut-off. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(2):405-412. doi:10.1007/s00330-013-3020-x

  11. Farid M, Demicco EG, Garcia R, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Oncologist. 2014;19(2):193-201. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0328

  12. Dunn GP, Spiliopoulos K, Plotkin SR, et al. Role of resection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(1):142-148. doi:10.3171/jns.2012.9.JNS101610

  13. Stucky CC, Johnson KN, Gray RJ, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST): the Mayo Clinic experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):878-885. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1978-7

  14. Dombi E, Baldwin A, Marcus LJ, et al. Activity of selumetinib in neurofibromatosis type 1-related plexiform neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(26):2550-2560. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1605943

  15. Fisher MJ, Avery RA, Allen JC, et al. Functional outcome measures for NF1-associated optic pathway glioma clinical trials. Neurology. 2013;81(21 Suppl 1):S15-S24. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000435745.95155.b8

  16. Needle MN, Cnaan A, Dattilo J, et al. Prognostic signs in the surgical management of plexiform neurofibroma: the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia experience, 1974-1994. J Pediatr. 1997;131(5):678-682. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70092-1

  17. Bhargava R, Parham DM, Lasater OE, et al. MR imaging differentiation of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: use of the target sign. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27(2):124-129. doi:10.1007/s002470050082

  18. Jett K, Friedman JM. Clinical and genetic aspects of neurofibromatosis 1. Genet Med. 2010;12(1):1-11. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181bf15e3

Quick Stats
Reading Time105 min
Related Topics

Bone Island (Enostosis)

Chordoma

Expandable Prostheses in Pediatric Oncology

Fibrosarcoma of Bone