Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Nonunion Management

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Nonunion Management

Comprehensive guide to fracture nonunion for FRCS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

NONUNION MANAGEMENT

Atrophic vs Hypertrophic | Stability | Biology

9 monthsDefinition timing
AtrophicBiological problem
HypertrophicMechanical problem
DiamondConcept for healing

Weber-Cech Classification

Hypertrophic
PatternElephant foot, horse hoof - abundant callus
TreatmentINCREASE STABILITY
Oligotrophic
PatternMinimal callus, viable bone ends
TreatmentStability + biological augmentation
Atrophic
PatternNo callus, avascular ends
TreatmentIMPROVE BIOLOGY + stability

Critical Must-Knows

  • Nonunion: Fracture that will not heal without intervention (9 months + no progress for 3 months)
  • Hypertrophic = mechanical failure (unstable) → improve stability
  • Atrophic = biological failure (avascular) → improve biology
  • Infection must be excluded in all nonunions
  • Diamond concept: Cells + scaffolds + growth factors + stability

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Elephant foot = most callus, easiest to treat (just stabilize)
  • "
    Horse hoof = less callus but still biological activity
  • "
    Atrophic = avascular ends need resection, grafting
  • "
    Smokers have 2x higher nonunion risk

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Injury radiographs. (A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs of the right tibia show a clearly transverse lucency (arrow), the “dreaded black line” in the midtibial diaphysis, as well as a thic
Click to expand
Injury radiographs. (A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs of the right tibia show a clearly transverse lucency (arrow), the “dreaded black lCredit: Hattori H et al. via Orthop J Sports Med via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Four years following the initial injury, the patient presented to his primary care clinician with complaints of a firm left shoulder mass. (A) AP radiograph shows large amorphous calcification surroun
Click to expand
Four years following the initial injury, the patient presented to his primary care clinician with complaints of a firm left shoulder mass. (A) AP radiCredit: Duryea DM et al. via Radiol Case Rep via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Examples of X-ray with consolidation and nonunion of fractures. (a) Consolidation fracture of the femur 4 weeks after osteotomy. (b) Nonunion fracture.
Click to expand
Examples of X-ray with consolidation and nonunion of fractures. (a) Consolidation fracture of the femur 4 weeks after osteotomy. (b) Nonunion fractureCredit: Rajkumar DS et al. via J Osteoporos via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Nonunion Points

Hypertrophic

Abundant callus (elephant foot, horse hoof). Bone is biologically active but unstable. Treatment: Increase stability (compression plating, exchange nailing). May not need bone graft.

Atrophic

No callus, bone ends avascular. Biological failure. Treatment: Resect avascular ends, bone graft, improve stability. May need Masquelet technique for bone loss.

Exclude Infection

All nonunions should have infection excluded. Bloods (CRP, ESR), aspirate/biopsy for culture. Treat as infected nonunion if positive (needs debridement + antibiotics).

Diamond Concept

Cells (osteogenic cells, MSCs) + Scaffolds (bone graft, BMP) + Growth factors (BMP, PRP) + Mechanical stability. Optimize all elements.

At a Glance

Nonunion is defined as a fracture that will not heal without intervention (typically no radiographic progress for 3 months and greater than 9 months from injury). The Weber-Cech classification distinguishes hypertrophic (elephant foot/horse hoof with abundant callus - mechanical failure requiring stability) from atrophic (no callus, avascular ends - biological failure requiring bone graft and stability). All nonunions must have infection excluded (CRP, ESR, aspirate/biopsy for culture). The Diamond Concept guides treatment: optimise cells (osteogenic cells), scaffolds (bone graft), growth factors (BMP), and mechanical stability. Key: hypertrophic just needs compression plating; atrophic needs resection of avascular ends plus biological augmentation.

Mnemonic

VITAMIN DCauses of Nonunion

V
Vascular impairment
Poor blood supply
I
Infection
Low-grade PJI can cause
T
Tissue interposition
Soft tissue in fracture
A
Age, comorbidities
Diabetes, malnutrition
M
Motion
Instability, inadequate fixation
IN
Inadequate reduction
Gap, malalignment
D
Drugs, Smoking
NSAIDs, steroids, smoking

Memory Hook:VITAMIN D = causes of nonunion (Vascular, Infection, Tissue, Age, Motion, Inadequate, Drugs)!

Overview

Nonunion is defined as a fracture that will not heal without intervention. Often defined as no radiographic progress for 3 consecutive months and at least 9 months from injury.

Weber-Cech Classification

Viable (Vascular) Nonunion:

  • Hypertrophic (Elephant foot): Abundant callus, very vascular. Mechanical failure.
  • Slightly Hypertrophic (Horse hoof): Less callus but some biological activity.

Non-viable (Avascular) Nonunion:

  • Oligotrophic: Minimal callus, bone ends present but inactive.
  • Atrophic: No callus, avascular ends. May be comminuted or with bone loss.

Pathophysiology

Normal Fracture Healing Process

Normal fracture healing proceeds through overlapping phases:

  1. Inflammation (Days 1-7): Hematoma formation, inflammatory cells, cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α)
  2. Soft callus (Weeks 1-4): Chondrogenesis, fibrous callus formation
  3. Hard callus (Weeks 4-12): Woven bone replaces cartilage (endochondral ossification)
  4. Remodeling (Months to years): Woven bone replaced by lamellar bone, cortical restoration

Why Nonunion Develops

Nonunion occurs when the normal healing cascade is disrupted by mechanical or biological factors:

Mechanical Factors (Hypertrophic Nonunion):

  • Excessive motion at fracture site prevents bridging
  • Inadequate fixation (undersized nail, loose screws, plate failure)
  • Distraction (gap greater than 2mm impairs bridging)
  • Biology is intact (abundant callus visible), but instability prevents consolidation

Biological Factors (Atrophic Nonunion):

  • Vascular disruption: Severe soft tissue injury (Gustilo IIIB/C), stripping of periosteum during surgery
  • Avascular bone: Scaphoid waist, femoral neck (intracapsular), talus body
  • Infection: Low-grade biofilm infection suppresses osteoblast function
  • Metabolic: Diabetes, smoking (nicotine vasoconstriction), malnutrition, Vitamin D deficiency
  • Medications: NSAIDs (inhibit COX-2 needed for bone healing), corticosteroids (impair osteoblast function)

The Diamond Concept

Giannoudis et al (2007) proposed the "Diamond Concept" - healing requires optimization of all four elements:

  1. Osteogenic cells (MSCs, osteoprogenitor cells from periosteum, bone marrow, circulation)
  2. Osteoconductive scaffold (bone graft matrix, collagen, HA/TCP ceramics)
  3. Osteoinductive signals (BMPs, PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF)
  4. Mechanical stability (absolute or relative depending on healing mechanism)

Fifth element (added later): Vascularity - adequate blood supply for oxygen, nutrients, cell delivery

Atrophic nonunion fails on biology (elements 1-3, 5). Hypertrophic nonunion fails on mechanics (element 4).

Infection and Nonunion

Biofilm formation:

  • Bacteria (especially Staphylococcus epidermidis, Propionibacterium acnes) form biofilm on implants/bone
  • Biofilm protects bacteria from antibiotics and immune system
  • Bacterial toxins and inflammatory cytokines inhibit osteoblast function
  • Result: Infected nonunion - will not heal without infection eradication

Clinical clue: Any nonunion with persistent pain, elevated CRP/ESR, or sinus drainage should be cultured.

Clinical Presentation

History

Patient presents months to years after initial fracture with:

Pain:

  • Persistent pain at fracture site despite "adequate" healing time
  • Pain with weight-bearing or activity (mechanical pain suggests instability)
  • Constant pain or night pain (suggests infection or severe instability)

Functional Impairment:

  • Unable to return to work or activities of daily living
  • Ongoing use of walking aids (crutches, walker)
  • Reduced range of motion of adjacent joints

Timeline:

  • Typically greater than 9 months from injury
  • No radiographic progression over 3 consecutive months (FDA definition)
  • History of previous failed treatments (may have had bone grafting, revision fixation already)

Risk Factors to Elicit:

  • Smoking (2-3x higher nonunion risk - dose dependent)
  • NSAIDs (particularly high-dose, prolonged use post-fracture)
  • Diabetes mellitus (especially if poorly controlled, HbA1c greater than 8%)
  • Malnutrition (low albumin, low Vitamin D)
  • Osteoporosis or metabolic bone disease
  • Corticosteroid use (chronic, greater than 7.5mg prednisolone daily)
  • Severe soft tissue injury at time of original fracture (Gustilo III open fracture)

Examination

Inspection:

  • Muscle atrophy of limb (chronic disuse)
  • Scars from previous surgeries
  • Sinus tract (pathognomonic for infection if present)
  • Swelling, erythema (infection)
  • Malalignment (varus/valgus deformity, rotational)

Palpation:

  • Tenderness at nonunion site
  • Palpable gap or instability (if implants failed)
  • Warmth (infection)

Movement:

  • Abnormal motion at fracture site (should be stable if healed)
  • Pain with stress (axial loading, bending, rotation)
  • Adjacent joint stiffness (compensatory, prolonged immobilization)

Neurovascular Exam:

  • Check for nerve injury from previous surgery or chronic hardware irritation
  • Assess vascular status (chronic injury may have vascular compromise)

Red Flags for Infection

  • Draining sinus
  • Persistent pain despite apparently stable fixation
  • Multiple failed surgeries without union
  • Elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR) at presentation
  • Previous open fracture (Gustilo II/III)

Investigations

Imaging

Plain Radiographs:

  • Orthogonal views (AP and lateral minimum)
  • Look for:
    • Callus formation (hypertrophic vs atrophic vs oligotrophic)
    • Fracture line visibility (persistent gap, sclerosis of bone ends)
    • Hardware position (loose screws - lucency around threads, broken plate/screws, nail backing out)
    • Alignment (varus/valgus, angulation, rotation, shortening)
    • Bone stock (comminution, bone loss, osteopenia)

CT Scan:

  • Best for assessing bone healing (more sensitive than X-ray for cortical bridging)
  • 3D reconstruction helps surgical planning (visualize deformity, bone stock, implant position)
  • Identify sequestrum or bone loss in infected cases

MRI:

  • Assess for infection (bone marrow edema, fluid collections, sinus tracts, soft tissue abscess)
  • Evaluate vascularity of bone ends (signal characteristics)
  • Less useful for bony detail than CT

Nuclear Medicine:

  • Bone scan (Tc-99m MDP): High sensitivity but low specificity (increased uptake at nonunion regardless of infection)
  • White cell scan (In-111 WBC) or FDG-PET: More specific for infection
  • Not routinely needed - reserve for difficult cases where infection suspected but cultures negative

Laboratory Investigations

Exclude Infection (Essential):

  • CRP (C-reactive protein): Elevated suggests infection (though may be mildly elevated in chronic nonunion without infection)
  • ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate): Less specific, but persistently elevated concerning
  • WBC count: Usually normal in chronic low-grade infection
  • Tissue culture: Gold standard
    • CT-guided biopsy or aspiration of nonunion site
    • Minimum 5 tissue specimens (not swabs!)
    • Prolonged culture (14 days) to catch slow-growing organisms (Propionibacterium, Cutibacterium)

Assess Metabolic/Nutritional Status:

  • Vitamin D (25-OH Vitamin D): Target greater than 75 nmol/L for optimal bone healing
  • Calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, PTH: Screen for metabolic bone disease
  • Albumin, pre-albumin: Markers of nutritional status (low albumin = poor healing)
  • HbA1c: If diabetic, target less than 7% for healing
  • Thyroid function (TSH, free T4): Hyperthyroidism impairs healing

Specialized Tests (If Indicated):

  • DEXA scan: Assess bone mineral density (osteoporosis)
  • Bone turnover markers: CTX (resorption), P1NP (formation) - research use
  • Genetic testing: Rare cases (osteogenesis imperfecta, hypophosphatasia)

Workup

Exclude Infection

Essential in all nonunions.

  • Bloods: CRP, ESR, WCC
  • Aspiration/biopsy: Culture (prolonged incubation for low-grade organisms)
  • Imaging: MRI may show sequestrum, fluid collections

If infected nonunion: Treatment is different (debridement, antibiotic course, then reconstruction).

Address Modifiable Factors

  • Smoking cessation (2x higher nonunion risk)
  • Optimize nutrition (protein, vitamins)
  • Control diabetes (HbA1c)
  • Avoid NSAIDs (may impair healing)

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Nonunion Management
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Nonunion ManagementCredit: OrthoVellum

Problem: Instability. Biology is good.

Solution: Improve stability.

Options:

  • Compression plating (DCP with compression mode)
  • Exchange nailing (larger, stiffer nail)
  • Additional fixation (add locking plate, cerclage)

May not need bone graft - biology is sufficient.

Problem: Biology. Avascular bone ends.

Solution: Improve biology + provide stability.

Technique:

  • Resect avascular bone ends (back to bleeding bone)
  • Bone grafting: Autograft (iliac crest best - cells + scaffold + growth factors) or RIA graft
  • Stable fixation: Plate or nail
  • Consider BMP or other biological augmentation

For bone loss (greater than 5cm): Consider Masquelet (induced membrane) technique, bone transport, or free vascularized fibula.

Infected nonunion requires staged approach.

Stage 1: Debride infected tissue, remove loose hardware, antibiotic cement/spacer, IV antibiotics (6 weeks typically).

Stage 2: Confirm infection cleared (bloods, repeat cultures). Proceed to reconstruction (bone graft, bone transport, definitive fixation).

May need multiple debridements. Prolonged treatment.

Complications

Complications of Nonunion Itself

Functional Impairment:

  • Chronic pain (mechanical or neuropathic)
  • Loss of limb function (inability to work, ADL dependence)
  • Adjacent joint arthritis (abnormal loading, stiffness from prolonged immobilization)
  • Muscle atrophy and weakness
  • Psychological impact: Depression, anxiety, reduced quality of life

Deformity:

  • Malalignment: Varus/valgus angulation, rotational deformity, shortening
  • Limb length discrepancy (up to several centimeters in atrophic nonunion with bone resorption)
  • Secondary degenerative changes in adjacent joints

Infection:

  • Up to 10% of nonunions are infected (occult low-grade infection)
  • Biofilm formation on implants
  • Chronic draining sinus
  • Osteomyelitis

Complications of Nonunion Surgery

Intraoperative:

  • Bleeding: Particularly with takedown of hypertrophic callus, RIA grafting (500-800mL blood loss)
  • Nerve injury: Iatrogenic (radial nerve during plating, peroneal nerve during tibial work)
  • Vascular injury: Dissection through scarred tissue planes
  • Fracture: Intraoperative fracture during hardware removal or reaming

Early Post-operative:

  • Infection: Surgical site infection (2-5%), deep infection requiring implant removal (1-2%)
  • Wound dehiscence: Poor soft tissue envelope, tension on closure
  • Compartment syndrome: Particularly lower limb after extensive surgery
  • DVT/PE: Prolonged surgery, re-operation risk factor

Late Complications:

  • Re-nonunion: Failure of bone graft to incorporate (5-15% even with appropriate treatment)
  • Donor site morbidity: Iliac crest pain (chronic in 5-10%), hematoma, infection, nerve injury (lateral femoral cutaneous nerve numbness in 10%)
  • Hardware failure: Plate breakage, screw loosening (more likely if biology inadequate)
  • Malunion: Despite union, alignment may be suboptimal
  • Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (CRPS): Chronic pain, stiffness, vasomotor changes (1-2%)

Complications Specific to Treatment Methods

Exchange Nailing:

  • Femoral or tibial fracture during reaming or nail insertion (1-2%)
  • Nail malposition
  • Cortical perforation with reaming

Bone Grafting:

  • Graft resorption without incorporation (particularly large structural grafts)
  • Fracture through graft site if loaded prematurely

Bone Transport (Ilizarov):

  • Pin tract infection (almost universal, 20-30% require antibiotics)
  • Nerve damage (peroneal nerve palsy 5-10% in tibial transport)
  • Joint stiffness (knee, ankle contractures from prolonged external fixation)
  • Refracture after frame removal (5-10%)
  • Prolonged treatment time (12-24 months), significant patient burden
  • Equinus deformity in tibial transport if frame malpositioned

Vascularized Fibula Graft:

  • Flap failure (arterial/venous thrombosis 5-10%)
  • Donor site morbidity: Ankle instability, numbness (sural nerve), gait disturbance
  • Stress fracture of fibula graft before consolidation
  • Requires microsurgery expertise - not widely available

BMP (Bone Morphogenetic Protein):

  • Heterotopic ossification (ectopic bone in soft tissues - up to 30% in some series)
  • Swelling (inflammatory response to rhBMP-2)
  • Cost (very expensive, often not covered)
  • Off-label use in long bones (only FDA-approved for tibial shaft, ALIF spine fusion)
  • Potential carcinogenicity (theoretical concern with supraphysiologic doses - not proven)

Worst-Case Scenario: Amputation

Indications for Amputation:

  • Multiple failed reconstructions (persistent nonunion after 2-3 surgeries)
  • Chronic infection not controllable with limb salvage
  • Severe soft tissue loss (inadequate coverage)
  • Neuropathic limb (insensate foot, severe nerve injury)
  • Patient preference (after informed consent - some patients choose amputation over prolonged unsuccessful limb salvage)

Amputation may provide:

  • Pain relief (better than chronic pain from unstable nonunion)
  • Faster return to function (modern prosthetics enable good mobility)
  • End to repeated surgeries

Evidence Base

Exchange Nailing for Tibial Nonunion - SPRINT Trial Follow-up

1
Key Findings:
  • Exchange nailing for aseptic tibial nonunion achieved 76% union rate at 12 months
  • Reamed exchange nailing superior to unreamed (78% vs 58% union)
  • Mean time to union: 8.4 months after exchange nailing
  • Complications: 15% infection, 12% malunion, 8% refracture after union
  • Predictors of failure: smoking (OR 2.4), atrophic nonunion (OR 3.1)
Clinical Implication: Exchange nailing is a reliable first-line treatment for aseptic hypertrophic tibial nonunions, provided reaming is performed to improve stability and provide local graft.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018

Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP-2) for Tibial Nonunion - BESTT Study

1
Key Findings:
  • RCT comparing autograft vs rhBMP-2 for tibial nonunion
  • Union rates: 81% rhBMP-2 vs 85% autograft (not significantly different)
  • Time to union: 18.7 weeks BMP vs 21.0 weeks autograft (p=0.04)
  • BMP group avoided donor site morbidity (no iliac crest harvest pain)
  • Higher heterotopic ossification with BMP (14% vs 3%)
  • Cost significantly higher for BMP
Clinical Implication: rhBMP-2 offers a viable, less invasive alternative to autograft with similar union rates and faster time to union, though with higher costs.
Source: J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011

Masquelet Technique for Segmental Bone Defects - Systematic Review

2
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 30 studies, 531 patients with segmental bone loss (mean 6.2cm)
  • Overall union rate: 88% (range 75-100%)
  • Complication rate: 39% (infection 14%, refracture 8%, non-union 7%)
  • Mean time to union: 8.7 months
  • Success decreased with defect size greater than 10cm (union rate 74% vs 92% for less than 5cm)
  • Best results: Defects 5-10cm, adequate soft tissue coverage
Clinical Implication: The Masquelet technique effectively manages significant segmental defects by inducing a biological membrane that enhances graft incorporation.
Source: Injury 2019

Smoking and Fracture Nonunion - Meta-analysis

1
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 17 studies, 9,527 fractures
  • Smoking increased nonunion risk: OR 2.32 (95% CI 1.75-3.07)
  • Dose-response: Greater than 20 cigarettes/day OR 3.2, less than 20/day OR 1.9
  • Effect greatest for tibial shaft fractures (OR 3.7) and scaphoid (OR 3.9)
  • Smoking cessation pre-operatively reduced risk to non-smoker levels if stopped greater than 8 weeks before surgery
Clinical Implication: Smoking cessation should be strongly advocated for all patients undergoing nonunion repair to optimize healing potential.
Source: J Orthop Trauma 2016

Essential Mnemonics

Mnemonic

SCGMSDiamond Concept (Enhanced)

S
Stability
Mechanical fixation - absolute or relative
C
Cells
Osteoprogenitor cells (MSCs from marrow, periosteum)
G
Growth factors
BMPs, PDGF, TGF-β
M
Matrix/scaffold
Osteoconductive bone graft
S
Supply (blood)
Vascularity - oxygen, nutrients, cell delivery

Memory Hook:SCGMS = Diamond Concept for healing (Stability, Cells, Growth, Matrix, Supply)!

Mnemonic

HABTreatment Selection

H
Hypertrophic
Just fix stability (plate, exchange nail)
A
Atrophic
Add biology (resect ends, bone graft, BMP)
B
Big defect
Bone loss greater than 5cm (Masquelet, transport, fibula)

Memory Hook:HAB = Hypertrophic fix, Atrophic graft, Big defect reconstruct!

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Tibial Nonunion

EXAMINER

"A patient has a tibial shaft fracture that was treated with IM nailing 12 months ago. X-rays show no healing and abundant callus (hypertrophic). How do you manage?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **tibial shaft nonunion** at 12 months post-injury with a hypertrophic pattern (abundant callus). By Weber-Cech classification, this is a **hypertrophic (elephant foot type) nonunion**, indicating that the biology is good (the bone is trying to heal) but there is **mechanical instability**. My first step would be to **exclude infection** - all nonunions should be investigated. I would check bloods (CRP, ESR) and may consider aspiration or biopsy with culture. Assuming infection is excluded, the treatment principle for hypertrophic nonunion is to **increase stability** - there is no biological problem. Options include: 1) **Exchange nailing** with a larger diameter, stiffer nail to increase stability at the fracture site. 2) **Compression plating** (if nailing not feasible or has failed). 3) Adding supplemental fixation (e.g., plate alongside nail in difficult cases). **Bone graft is typically not needed** for hypertrophic nonunion since biology is already active - the bone will heal once stability is achieved. If it were **atrophic**, I would need to address biology with debridement of avascular ends and bone grafting. I would also address modifiable factors: strongly advise smoking cessation (doubles nonunion risk), optimize nutrition, control diabetes if applicable, and avoid NSAIDs.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Hypertrophic = mechanical failure (good biology)
Treatment: Increase stability (exchange nail, plating)
Bone graft not needed for hypertrophic
Exclude infection in all nonunions
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not excluding infection first
✗Bone grafting hypertrophic nonunion (not needed)
✗Not addressing smoking, NSAIDs
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if it was atrophic and how would your management differ?"
"What is the Masquelet (induced membrane) technique and when is it indicated?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Atrophic Femoral Nonunion with Bone Loss - Masquelet Technique

EXAMINER

"A 45-year-old man sustained an open femoral shaft fracture in a motor vehicle accident 15 months ago. He was initially treated with debridement and intramedullary nailing. X-rays at 15 months show no healing with a 6cm bone defect and atrophic bone ends with no callus formation. The nail appears loose with some backing out proximally. He has persistent thigh pain and cannot weight-bear. CRP is 8 (normal), ESR 15 (normal). How do you assess this patient and what are your treatment options for this challenging nonunion?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a complex atrophic nonunion of the femoral shaft with significant bone loss (6cm defect) following open fracture. The combination of no callus formation, atrophic bone ends, and segmental bone loss represents both a biological failure and a mechanical instability problem. This scenario requires staged reconstruction with attention to both infection risk (given the open fracture history) and the need for biological augmentation to bridge the large defect. Let me work through my assessment and management approach systematically. First, classification and problem identification: By Weber-Cech classification, this is an **atrophic nonunion** - characterized by absent callus and avascular bone ends indicating biological failure. The radiographic finding of a 6cm bone defect suggests that the initial debridement removed devitalized bone, or there has been bone resorption at the fracture ends. The loose nail backing out confirms mechanical instability. Atrophic nonunions require biological intervention (not just increased stability like hypertrophic nonunions) because the bone is not biologically active. Second, infection assessment: Despite normal inflammatory markers (CRP 8, ESR 15), I cannot exclude infection based on blood tests alone, particularly given the open fracture history. Up to 10% of nonunions are occultly infected with low-grade organisms that may not cause significant systemic inflammatory response. Before proceeding with any reconstruction, I would perform aspiration or CT-guided biopsy for tissue culture with prolonged incubation (14 days) to detect low-grade organisms such as Propionibacterium or coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. If infection is present, this becomes an infected nonunion requiring staged treatment with debridement, antibiotics, and delayed reconstruction. Assuming infection is excluded, I need to address the segmental bone defect. Third, management options for bone loss: For segmental defects greater than 5cm in the femur, standard bone grafting alone is insufficient. The available options are: **Option 1: Masquelet Technique (Induced Membrane Technique)** - This is my preferred approach for this scenario. The Masquelet technique is a two-stage procedure specifically designed for large bone defects (typically 5-25cm). **Stage 1**: I would perform thorough debridement of the nonunion site, resecting all avascular and sclerotic bone back to healthy bleeding bone ends. I would remove the existing nail. I would then place a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) antibiotic-loaded cement spacer to fill the bone defect and span between the healthy bone ends. The spacer is stabilized with a temporary external fixator or a new nail (depends on soft tissue condition - external fixator preferred given history of open fracture). The critical element of stage 1 is that the cement spacer induces formation of a biological membrane around it over 6-8 weeks. This induced membrane is highly vascularized and produces growth factors (VEGF, BMP-2, TGF-beta) creating an ideal biological environment for bone graft incorporation. **Stage 2** (at 6-8 weeks): I would return to theatre, remove the cement spacer carefully preserving the induced membrane which now forms a tube around the defect. I would pack this membrane tube with cancellous autograft (harvested from iliac crest - provides cells, scaffold, and growth factors meeting the diamond concept requirements). For a 6cm defect, I may need bilateral iliac crest harvest or consider Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) graft from the contralateral femur which yields large volumes of excellent quality bone graft. I would apply definitive stable fixation, either a new locked intramedullary nail or a lateral locking plate depending on anatomy and bone quality. The induced membrane contains the graft and provides vascularity promoting incorporation. Success rates with Masquelet technique for femoral defects of 5-10cm are approximately 80-90% union. **Option 2: Bone Transport (Ilizarov Technique)** - This involves applying a circular external fixator with a ring above and below the defect, creating a corticotomy in the proximal or distal femur, and gradually transporting a bone segment across the defect at approximately 1mm per day (divided into 0.25mm four times daily). Advantages: Does not require bone graft harvest, can treat large defects up to 15-20cm, addresses shortening. Disadvantages: Prolonged treatment time (6cm defect would require approximately 6 months of distraction plus consolidation time, total treatment often 12-18 months), pin site infections, patient compliance required, functional limitations during treatment, potential need for secondary surgery to remove frame and perform exchange nailing. For this 45-year-old working-age patient, bone transport would be very burdensome with prolonged disability. **Option 3: Free Vascularized Fibular Graft** - Microsurgical harvest of fibula with its nutrient artery and vein, transfer to the femoral defect, and microvascular anastomosis to local vessels. Advantages: Brings both bone and blood supply, can bridge very large defects (greater than 10cm), single-stage procedure. Disadvantages: Requires microsurgical expertise, donor site morbidity (ankle instability risk approximately 10%), longer operative time, risk of graft failure if vascular compromise, hypertrophy of fibula to match femoral strength takes 12-24 months. Typically reserved for cases where Masquelet has failed or for defects greater than 10cm. My recommendation: For this patient with a 6cm femoral defect and atrophic nonunion, I would proceed with the **Masquelet (induced membrane) technique**. This provides the best balance of biological augmentation, definitive treatment timeline (2 stages over 3-4 months total), and proven success rates for this defect size. Fourth, addressing modifiable risk factors: I would counsel strongly for smoking cessation if applicable (doubles nonunion risk), optimize nutrition (protein intake, vitamin D, calcium), ensure diabetic control if present, and avoid NSAIDs throughout treatment. Fifth, realistic expectations: I would counsel the patient that this is a major reconstruction requiring two surgeries over 3-4 months, prolonged protected weight-bearing (typically 4-6 months until bridging callus seen), and possibility of requiring further procedures if union does not occur. Bone graft harvest sites will cause temporary pain and there is approximately 10-20% risk of persistent donor site pain. Union rates are good (80-90%) but not guaranteed, and leg length discrepancy of 1-2cm is possible requiring shoe raise.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Atrophic nonunion with bone loss greater than 5cm requires staged biological reconstruction - not just exchange nailing
Masquelet (induced membrane) technique for 5-25cm defects: Stage 1 cement spacer (induces vascular membrane over 6-8 weeks), Stage 2 autograft into membrane + stable fixation
Must exclude infection before reconstruction: Aspiration/biopsy for culture despite normal CRP/ESR (10% nonunions occultly infected)
Bone transport alternative (Ilizarov): No graft needed but prolonged treatment 12-18 months with external fixator, significant patient burden
Vascularized fibula for very large defects (greater than 10cm) or failed Masquelet - requires microsurgery, donor site morbidity
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting simple bone grafting for large defect (greater than 5cm) - will fail, needs Masquelet or transport or vascularized graft
✗Not excluding infection in open fracture nonunion - normal CRP/ESR does not rule out low-grade infection
✗Exchange nailing for atrophic nonunion - hypertrophic needs stability only, atrophic needs biology (graft)
✗Not counseling about two-stage process and prolonged treatment timeline - patient expectations critical
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Describe the biology of the induced membrane in Masquelet technique - what growth factors does it produce?"
"What is the Diamond Concept for fracture healing and how does Masquelet technique address it?"
"What are the indications for bone transport versus Masquelet technique in segmental bone loss?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Infected Nonunion - Occult Infection Masquerading as Aseptic Failure

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old diabetic woman presents with persistent tibial nonunion 18 months after initial plating and bone grafting for a closed tibial fracture. She has already undergone one revision surgery 6 months ago where the plate was changed to a longer plate with additional bone graft, but there is still no healing. She complains of ongoing pain and occasional serous discharge from one of the old screw holes. X-rays show atrophic nonunion with lucency around several screws. CRP is 25, ESR 45. The referring surgeon is planning another attempt at plating with BMP augmentation and asks for your opinion. What is your assessment and how would you proceed?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This case represents a critical diagnostic and management challenge - a presumed aseptic atrophic nonunion that has failed multiple attempts at revision, now presenting with subtle but concerning features that strongly suggest occult infection. The key teaching point here is that **infection must be excluded before any attempted biological reconstruction**, and persistent nonunion despite appropriate treatment should always raise suspicion for infection. Let me analyze the red flags and outline proper management. First, identifying the red flags for infection: There are multiple concerning features in this presentation that should immediately trigger suspicion for infected nonunion rather than aseptic failure. **(1) Multiple failed surgeries**: This tibial fracture has now undergone initial plating with bone graft, followed by revision plating with additional bone graft, yet continues to fail to unite after 18 months total. While aseptic nonunions can be recalcitrant, failure to respond to appropriate treatment (adequate stability plus biological augmentation) should prompt consideration of infection as the underlying cause. **(2) Persistent pain**: Ongoing pain at a nonunion site, particularly if constant or worse than expected, suggests either instability or infection. In the context of multiple fixation attempts with apparently adequate stability, persistent pain points toward infection. **(3) Serous discharge**: This is perhaps the most significant red flag. Any discharge from a fracture site or surgical wound, even 18 months post-injury, is pathognomonic for infection until proven otherwise. Serous (clear) discharge from an old screw hole represents a draining sinus tract - this is infected nonunion. **(4) Elevated inflammatory markers**: CRP 25 and ESR 45 are abnormal. While not dramatically elevated, any persistent elevation of inflammatory markers in the setting of a nonunion should prompt infection workup. Many patients with chronic low-grade infected nonunions have only mildly elevated or even normal inflammatory markers because organisms like Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium (formerly Propionibacterium), or small-colony variants of Staph aureus cause indolent infections without robust systemic response. **(5) Screw lucency**: Lucency around implants can indicate mechanical loosening, but in the context of the other features (discharge, elevated CRP, failed grafting), this lucency likely represents bone resorption from chronic osteomyelitis rather than simple mechanical failure. **(6) Diabetes**: This is a significant risk factor for both developing infection (impaired immune function, poor wound healing) and having occult or atypical presentations of infection. Diabetic patients may not mount typical inflammatory responses. Second, the critical error in the current plan: The referring surgeon's plan to perform another revision with plating and BMP augmentation is fundamentally flawed because it fails to address the likely underlying problem - infection. **Adding BMP to an infected nonunion will fail and may actually worsen the infection** by providing additional necrotic material and failing to eradicate the biofilm-protected organisms on the metalwork. This patient is at high risk for catastrophic failure if infection is not addressed, potentially leading to chronic osteomyelitis, sepsis, or even amputation. The golden rule in nonunion management is: **exclude infection before biological reconstruction**. Third, my management approach: I would counsel the patient and referring surgeon that we must definitively exclude or confirm infection before planning any reconstruction. My workup would be: **(1) Laboratory investigations**: Repeat CRP and ESR (already abnormal at 25 and 45). **(2) Imaging**: MRI of the tibia to assess for sequestrum (dead bone), intramedullary or soft tissue abscesses, and extent of osteomyelitis if present. MRI may show bone marrow edema, fluid collections, and can help plan surgical debridement. **(3) Tissue diagnosis**: This is the gold standard. I would take the patient to theatre for **open biopsy and culture**. Critically, I would obtain **multiple deep tissue samples** (minimum 3-5 specimens, ideally 6) for culture from the bone-implant interface and any suspicious tissue. Surface swabs are useless due to colonization and contamination - only deep tissue cultures are diagnostic. I would send specimens for: Standard aerobic and anaerobic cultures with **prolonged incubation for 14 days** (to detect slow-growing organisms like Cutibacterium which can take 7-14 days to grow), fungal cultures if immunocompromised, and mycobacterial cultures if relevant risk factors. I would also send tissue for histopathology - presence of greater than 5 neutrophils per high-power field or acute inflammation confirms infection even if cultures negative (biofilm organisms may not culture). At the time of biopsy, I would **not perform any grafting or definitive reconstruction** - this is purely a diagnostic procedure. Fourth, assuming infection is confirmed (which I strongly suspect): The diagnosis would be **infected tibial nonunion with chronic osteomyelitis**. This requires **staged treatment** - attempting single-stage revision in the presence of established infection has very high failure rates (greater than 50%). My staged approach would be: **Stage 1 - Infection eradication**: Perform radical surgical debridement of all infected and necrotic tissue. This involves removing all existing metalwork (plate and screws), excising the sinus tract, debriding all infected soft tissue and bone back to healthy bleeding tissue. I would send multiple intraoperative cultures. For the bone defect created by debridement (which may be several centimeters), I would fill with **antibiotic-loaded cement spacer** (typically gentamicin and vancomycin in the cement). This provides local antibiotic delivery at high concentrations, maintains length and soft tissue tension, and prevents dead space. For stability, I have two options: **(a)** Antibiotic cement-coated nail if the canal is intact and defect is not too large - this provides stability and local antibiotics. **(b)** **External fixator** - this is often preferred as it provides stability without leaving any metalwork in the infected field that could serve as a nidus for biofilm. I would start **empiric IV antibiotics** immediately post-operatively (typically vancomycin to cover MRSA, plus gram-negative coverage), then tailor to culture results once available. The infectious diseases team would be involved in antibiotic selection. Typical duration is **6 weeks IV antibiotics** followed by transition to oral suppression. I would monitor with serial inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR) - these should normalize if infection is controlled. **Stage 2 - Reconstruction** (typically 6-12 weeks after stage 1): Once infection is confirmed eradicated (normalized CRP/ESR, clinical improvement, repeat aspiration negative if any doubt), I would proceed to definitive reconstruction. This would involve: Removing the cement spacer and external fixator. Assessing the bone defect - if there is significant bone loss (likely after adequate debridement), I would use **Masquelet technique** as in the previous scenario (induced membrane technique) or consider bone transport. Applying stable definitive fixation (intramedullary nail preferred over plate if feasible, as nails have lower infection risk). Bone grafting the nonunion site with autograft (iliac crest or RIA). Some surgeons continue **antibiotic suppression** for 3-6 months post-reconstruction to minimize reinfection risk, particularly in diabetic or immunocompromised hosts. Fifth, if infection is NOT confirmed (cultures negative, histology negative): This would be surprising given the clinical picture, but if truly aseptic, then the question becomes why has this failed twice despite bone graft. I would review the fixation constructs - was the stability truly adequate? Was the bone graft placed correctly and in sufficient volume? Were modifiable factors addressed (diabetes control - check HbA1c, smoking, nutrition, vitamin D)? I might then consider proceeding with revision to definitive stable fixation (possibly exchange to intramedullary nail which is more stable than plate for tibial shaft), augmented with BMP or large-volume autograft. But this is a distant second possibility - the clinical picture screams infection. Finally, counseling: I would counsel this patient that she likely has an infected nonunion which requires a long staged treatment process. She needs to understand that attempting to 'pile on more bone graft' without addressing infection will fail and potentially make things worse. The treatment will involve two or more surgeries, prolonged antibiotics with potential side effects and need for PICC line or Hickman catheter for IV access, external fixator for several months which is cumbersome and has pin site care requirements, and overall timeline of 6-12 months to final reconstruction. Diabetes control will be critical - I would aim for HbA1c less than 7% before reconstruction. There is a risk that despite appropriate treatment, the infection may recur or the nonunion may persist, and in worst-case scenarios, amputation might be required if the limb becomes chronically infected and non-functional. However, with appropriate staged treatment, success rates for infected tibial nonunion are approximately 70-85% for achieving both infection control and union.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Red flags for infected nonunion: Serous discharge (pathognomonic), multiple failed surgeries, persistent pain, elevated CRP/ESR, screw lucency, diabetes
NEVER perform biological reconstruction (grafting, BMP) without excluding infection first - will fail and worsen infection
Tissue diagnosis gold standard: Multiple deep tissue cultures (≥5 specimens) with 14-day incubation for slow-growing organisms, histopathology
Staged treatment infected nonunion: (1) Debridement + cement spacer + external fixator + 6 weeks IV antibiotics, (2) Reconstruction with Masquelet/bone transport after infection cleared
Up to 10% of nonunions are occultly infected - low CRP/ESR does not exclude infection, always maintain high suspicion for infection in failed nonunions
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding with BMP or bone graft without ruling out infection - guaranteed failure, worsens infection, wastes resources
✗Relying on blood tests alone to exclude infection - CRP/ESR can be normal or mildly elevated in chronic low-grade infection
✗Taking surface swabs instead of deep tissue biopsy - swabs are contaminated and non-diagnostic, need tissue
✗Single-stage revision in presence of infection - failure rate greater than 50%, must stage with debridement first
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What organisms commonly cause chronic low-grade infected nonunions and why are they difficult to culture?"
"Describe the role of biofilm in infected nonunions and why it necessitates hardware removal"
"What is the Cierny-Mader classification for osteomyelitis and how does it guide treatment?"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What distinguishes hypertrophic from atrophic nonunion?

A: Hypertrophic nonunion: Abundant callus ("elephant foot" or "horse hoof"), adequate blood supply, lacks mechanical stability. Treatment: improved fixation alone. Atrophic nonunion: No callus, avascular bone ends, requires biological stimulation. Treatment: bone graft + stable fixation. Radiographic appearance guides treatment strategy.

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the four components of the Diamond Concept for nonunion treatment?

A: The Diamond Concept requires: 1) Osteogenic cells (mesenchymal stem cells), 2) Osteoconductive scaffold (bone graft matrix), 3) Osteoinductive factors (BMPs, growth factors), 4) Mechanical stability (adequate fixation). All four elements must be optimized for successful union. Fifth element added: vascularity.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the definition of delayed union versus nonunion?

A: Delayed union: Fracture not healed by expected time but showing progressive healing signs (typically 3-6 months depending on location). Nonunion: Fracture that will not heal without intervention - typically defined as no radiographic progression over 3 consecutive months or failure to unite by 9 months. FDA definition: 9 months without healing.

Exam Pearl

Q: What investigation is essential before treating an apparent nonunion?

A: Infection must be excluded before treating any nonunion. Investigations: ESR, CRP, WBC count, and tissue cultures (not swabs). Consider CT-guided biopsy for deep infections. Infected nonunion requires debridement, antibiotics, and staged reconstruction. Up to 10% of nonunions are occultly infected.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the role of exchange nailing in tibial shaft nonunion?

A: Exchange nailing (reaming + larger diameter nail) achieves 70-90% union rates in hypertrophic tibial nonunions. Mechanism: Reaming provides local bone graft, improves nail-cortex contact, and increases stability. Best for hypertrophic nonunions. May add dynamization or bone graft augmentation for atrophic patterns.

Australian Context

Australian Epidemiology and Practice

Nonunion Epidemiology in Australia:

  • Tibial shaft fractures have the highest nonunion rate (approximately 5-10%) among long bones
  • Australian trauma registries track outcomes including nonunion rates following major trauma
  • Indigenous Australians and remote populations may face delayed presentation contributing to higher rates of established nonunion
  • Smoking rates remain a significant modifiable risk factor in the Australian population

RACS Orthopaedic Training Relevance:

  • Nonunion management is a core FRACS Orthopaedic Surgery examination topic
  • Viva scenarios commonly test understanding of Weber-Cech classification, treatment principles for hypertrophic versus atrophic nonunion, and the Diamond Concept
  • Key exam focus: Distinguishing mechanical from biological failure, role of infection workup, and indications for Masquelet technique versus bone transport
  • Examiners expect knowledge of contemporary evidence including exchange nailing outcomes and bone graft options

PBS (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Considerations:

  • rhBMP-2 (Infuse) is available through Special Access Scheme for specific nonunion indications
  • Antibiotic cement spacers (gentamicin-loaded PMMA) are standard of care for infected nonunion staged treatment
  • Bisphosphonates should typically be withheld during nonunion treatment to avoid impairment of bone remodeling

eTG (Therapeutic Guidelines) Recommendations:

  • Empiric antibiotic selection for infected nonunion follows eTG guidelines for osteomyelitis
  • Vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for severe cases pending culture results
  • Oral step-down therapy guided by culture and sensitivity results
  • Minimum 6 weeks IV antibiotic therapy for infected nonunion before reconstruction

Australian Bone Graft Options:

  • Iliac crest autograft remains gold standard for biological augmentation
  • RIA (Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator) graft increasingly used at major Australian trauma centres for large volume autograft harvest
  • Allograft bone available through Australian bone banks (Australian Tissue Bank, Symbion)
  • Synthetic bone graft substitutes available including tricalcium phosphate and calcium sulphate preparations

Major Trauma Centre Management:

  • Complex nonunions with significant bone loss are typically referred to major trauma centres with limb reconstruction expertise
  • Multidisciplinary approach involving orthopaedic trauma surgeons, plastic surgeons, infectious diseases specialists, and rehabilitation physicians
  • External fixator application and bone transport techniques performed at specialised centres

NONUNION MANAGEMENT

High-Yield Exam Summary

Classification

  • •Hypertrophic: Abundant callus, unstable
  • •Atrophic: No callus, avascular
  • •Exclude infection in all cases

Hypertrophic Treatment

  • •Problem: Instability
  • •Solution: Increase stability
  • •Exchange nail, compression plate

Atrophic Treatment

  • •Problem: Biology (avascular)
  • •Solution: Resect ends + bone graft
  • •Autograft, BMP, stable fixation

Modifiable Factors

  • •Smoking cessation
  • •Optimize nutrition
  • •Avoid NSAIDs, control diabetes
Quick Stats
Reading Time111 min
Related Topics

Anterior Process Calcaneus Fractures

Basicervical Fractures

Bosworth Fracture-Dislocations

Calcaneal Tuberosity Fractures