Pathologic Fracture Management
Exam Essential Concepts:
- Impending vs completed pathologic fractures
- Mirels' scoring system for fracture risk stratification
- Biopsy before fixation principle (with exceptions)
- Reconstruction options based on expected survival
- Complications of instrumentation through tumor
Visual One-Pager
Visual summary content - See sections below for detailed information on Mirels scoring, surgical algorithms, and reconstruction techniques.
Definition & Classification
High Yield
At a Glance
Pathologic fractures occur through bone weakened by underlying disease, most commonly metastatic carcinoma (breast, lung, prostate, renal, thyroid) or multiple myeloma. The Mirels' scoring system (site, pain, lesion type, size) guides prophylactic fixation decisions - a score ≥9 indicates high fracture risk warranting stabilization. The principle of biopsy before fixation applies unless the primary tumor is known with certainty. Reconstruction choice depends on expected survival: short survival favours load-sharing devices (IM nails, endoprostheses), while longer survival may warrant more durable reconstructions. Lytic lesions in the femur (especially peritrochanteric) carry highest fracture risk.
MIRELSMIRELS Scoring Mnemonic
Memory Hook:Think of MIRELS as a mirror reflecting fracture risk - if the score shows high numbers, the fracture is about to appear in the mirror of reality
Pathophysiology
Bone Weakening Mechanisms
Clinical Presentation
Pathologic Fracture Red Flags:
- Progressive bone pain over weeks to months before fracture
- Night pain unrelieved by rest (tumor characteristic)
- Fracture with minimal trauma or normal activity
- Known malignancy history (even if remote)
- Constitutional symptoms: weight loss, fatigue, fever
- Multiple sites of bone pain (polyostotic involvement)
History Components
Pain Characterization:
- Onset: Gradual vs sudden (fracture event)
- Duration: Weeks to months of preceding pain typical
- Character: Dull, aching, progressive
- Timing: Night pain suggests tumor
- Relieving factors: Activity modification, NSAIDs often ineffective
- Red flag symptoms: Fever, night sweats, weight loss, anorexia
Mechanism of Injury:
- Detailed mechanism assessment critical
- "Twisted getting out of chair" or "stepping off curb" suggests pathologic
- High-energy trauma can occur through pathologic bone (confounding)
- Pain before the fall indicates pre-existing pathology
- Multiple witnesses may clarify mechanism
Medical History:
- Current or previous malignancy (type, stage, treatments)
- Radiation therapy to bone (radiation-induced fractures)
- Prolonged corticosteroid use (osteoporosis, osteonecrosis)
- Metabolic bone disease history
- Previous fractures (pattern recognition)
- Family history (hereditary bone disorders)
Functional Impact:
- Pre-fracture ambulatory status
- Weight-bearing ability
- Pain limiting function
- Social support and home environment
- Goals and expectations (align with prognosis)
Physical Examination
Clinical Pearl: Examination Priorities:
- Neurovascular status (baseline documentation)
- Skin integrity (open fracture risk with minimal soft tissue trauma)
- Gross deformity and limb alignment
- Palpable mass (soft tissue extension)
- Regional lymphadenopathy (rare but possible)
- Systematic examination for additional lesions
Inspection:
- Swelling, ecchymosis (may be disproportionate)
- Deformity, limb shortening, rotation
- Previous surgical scars (biopsy sites)
- Skin changes (radiation, infection, tumor ulceration)
- Muscle wasting (chronic pain, denervation)
Palpation:
- Point tenderness over fracture site
- Palpable mass or cortical defect
- Temperature (infection, inflammation)
- Crepitus with gentle range of motion
- Proximal and distal joint examination
Neurovascular Examination:
- Pulse assessment (ABI if concern)
- Capillary refill
- Sensory examination (nerve compression or injury)
- Motor function (avoid stressing fracture)
- Document findings precisely (medicolegal, surgical planning)
Systematic Survey:
- Spine palpation and percussion
- Pelvis compression and distraction
- Contralateral limb examination
- Abdominal examination (organomegaly)
- Chest auscultation (lung metastases)
The examination should identify fracture complications while gathering clues to underlying diagnosis without causing additional patient discomfort or fracture displacement.
Investigations
Imaging Modalities
STABILIZEWorkup Sequence for Pathologic Fractures
Memory Hook:STABILIZE the patient, STABILIZE the diagnosis, STABILIZE the bone - all three must occur for optimal outcomes
Surgical Decision-Making
Biopsy Principles
Biopsy Golden Rules:
- Biopsy before definitive treatment (except known metastatic disease)
- Biopsy tract must be excisable with tumor (if primary sarcoma)
- Avoid contaminating uninvolved compartments
- Coordinate with treating oncologic surgeon before biopsy
- "Whoops" procedures drastically worsen sarcoma outcomes
Treatment Strategies
Non-Operative Management
Surgical Management
DURABLESurgical Construct Selection
Memory Hook:A DURABLE construct provides pain-free function for the patient's remaining lifespan - match invasiveness to prognosis
Complications
Prognosis & Outcomes
Survival After Pathologic Fracture
Prognostic Factors
Primary Tumor Type (Most Important):
Favorable Prognosis (Median Survival greater than 12 Months):
- Breast cancer (especially hormone receptor positive)
- Prostate cancer
- Thyroid cancer (follicular)
- Multiple myeloma
- Renal cell carcinoma (selected patients)
Intermediate Prognosis (6-12 Months):
- Renal cell carcinoma
- Colorectal cancer
- Melanoma
- Unknown primary
Poor Prognosis (Less than 6 Months):
- Lung cancer (especially small cell)
- Pancreatic cancer
- Gastric cancer
- Hepatocellular carcinoma
Burden of Disease:
- Solitary skeletal metastasis: better prognosis
- Multiple skeletal sites: intermediate
- Visceral metastases present: poor prognosis
- Spinal cord compression: worse outcomes
- Hypercalcemia: poor prognostic sign
Performance Status:
- Ambulatory, independent: better survival and quality of life
- Requires assistance: intermediate
- Bedridden: poor prognosis, limited benefit from surgery
Laboratory Markers:
- Elevated alkaline phosphatase: worse prognosis
- Anemia: associated with reduced survival
- Hypoalbuminemia: malnutrition, poor outcomes
- Hypercalcemia: advanced disease
Functional Outcomes
Functional Recovery After Surgical Stabilization
Expected Functional Recovery:
Lower Extremity Fractures:
- 75-85% regain ambulatory status
- Median time to weight-bearing: 3-7 days
- Ambulation level may not return to baseline
- Walking aids often required
- Rehabilitation limited by systemic disease progression
Upper Extremity Fractures:
- Greater than 90% achieve functional use
- Earlier return to activities of daily living
- Pain relief more consistent
- Better overall satisfaction
Quality of Life Improvements:
- Pain reduction (most consistent benefit)
- Independence in activities of daily living
- Psychological benefit (sense of control)
- Reduced caregiver burden
- Ability to receive oncologic treatments
- Facilitation of hospice care at home vs hospital
Factors Limiting Recovery:
- Disease progression (new metastases, visceral involvement)
- Complications (infection, nonunion, implant failure)
- Deconditioning during recovery
- Chemotherapy side effects
- Depression and anxiety
- Inadequate social support
Survival Data by Treatment
Survival Outcomes: Operative vs Non-Operative Management
Key Insights:
- Surgery does not prolong survival (systemic disease determines longevity)
- Surgery dramatically improves quality of life metrics
- Functional outcomes justify surgical morbidity in appropriate candidates
- Patient selection critical (avoid surgery in moribund patients)
- Goals: palliation, function, independence - not cure
The evidence supports surgical stabilization for functional restoration and quality of life, even in patients with limited prognosis, provided they are medically fit for anesthesia.
Special Populations
Pelvic & Acetabular Lesions
Spine Metastases with Pathologic Fracture
Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS):
Predicts spinal instability in metastatic disease (score 0-18):
Components:
- Location (junctional vs non-junctional)
- Pain (mechanical vs positional vs none)
- Bone lesion (lytic vs mixed vs blastic)
- Spinal alignment (subluxation, kyphosis, scoliosis)
- Vertebral body collapse (greater than 50%, less than 50%, none)
- Posterolateral involvement (bilateral, unilateral, none)
Score Interpretation:
- 0-6: Stable (radiation ± chemotherapy)
- 7-12: Potentially unstable (individualized decision)
- 13-18: Unstable (surgical stabilization indicated)
Surgical Indications:
- Spinal instability (SINS greater than or equal to 13)
- Neurologic deficit (cord compression, radiculopathy)
- Intractable pain despite radiation
- Radioresistant tumor
- Tissue diagnosis needed
Surgical Options:
Decompression + Instrumented Fusion:
- Relieves neural compression
- Provides immediate stability
- Allows early mobilization
- Does not address anterior column destruction (may fail)
Separation Surgery + Stereotactic Radiation:
- Minimal decompression (create space for radiation)
- Short-segment stabilization
- High-dose focused radiation post-op
- Emerging paradigm for radiosensitive tumors
Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty:
- Compression fractures without instability or cord compression
- Cement stabilization
- Pain relief in 70-90%
- Complications: cement leak, neural injury (rare)
Corpectomy + Reconstruction:
- Anterior column structural support
- Expandable cage or cement
- Combined with posterior stabilization
- Major surgery, reserved for longer survival expected
Spine pathologic fractures require neurosurgical or spine surgery expertise with oncology multidisciplinary team involvement.
Pediatric Pathologic Fractures
Unique Considerations:
Etiology Differences:
- Benign lesions more common (unicameral bone cyst, fibrous dysplasia, enchondroma)
- Primary malignant tumors (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma) vs metastatic
- Langerhan cell histiocytosis
- Leukemia/lymphoma
Growth Considerations:
- Avoid physeal injury if possible
- Limb-length discrepancy potential
- Remodeling potential greater than adults
- Long-term implant effects
Management Principles:
Benign Lesions:
- Many heal spontaneously after fracture (unicameral bone cyst 15%)
- Initial treatment: fracture immobilization
- Definitive treatment after healing (curettage, grafting)
- Avoid unnecessary surgery during acute phase
Malignant Lesions:
- Multimodal treatment (chemotherapy + surgery ± radiation)
- Limb salvage preferred when feasible
- Physeal-sparing techniques when possible
- Expandable prostheses for young children (accommodate growth)
The pediatric population requires subspecialty expertise with different treatment paradigms focused on cure and long-term function.
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Impending Subtrochanteric Fracture in Metastatic Breast Cancer
"A 68-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer (ER+/PR+) presents with 3 months of progressive right thigh pain. She is ambulatory with a cane. Radiograph shows a 4cm lytic lesion in the subtrochanteric region with greater than 50% cortical destruction on the lateral cortex. She is currently on an aromatase inhibitor. How do you approach this case?"
Completed Humeral Shaft Fracture Through Unknown Lesion
"A 55-year-old man presents with acute pain and deformity of his left arm after lifting a bag of groceries. Radiograph shows a mid-diaphyseal humeral fracture through a 3cm lytic lesion. He has no history of malignancy. Radial nerve is intact. How do you manage this patient?"
Exam Day Cheat Sheet
MCQ Practice Points
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the Mirels scoring system for impending pathological fractures?
A: Scores 1-3 points for each: Site (upper limb/lower limb/peritrochanteric), Pain (mild/moderate/functional), Lesion type (blastic/mixed/lytic), Size (less than 1/3, 1/3-2/3, greater than 2/3 of cortex). Total ≥8: Consider prophylactic fixation. Sensitivity ~90%, specificity ~35% for predicting fracture. Guides surgical decision-making for impending fractures.
Exam Pearl
Q: What are the principles of surgical fixation for pathological fractures?
A: Load-sharing constructs preferred - assume tumor will NOT heal. Locked intramedullary nails for long bone diaphyses. Endoprosthetic replacement for periarticular lesions or extensive bone loss. Cement augmentation fills defects and provides immediate stability. Span entire bone - protect against additional lesions. Radiation post-operatively.
Exam Pearl
Q: When should pathological lesions be biopsied before fixation?
A: Biopsy first if: Unknown primary, solitary lesion in patient without cancer history, atypical features, suspicion of primary bone tumor. Direct to surgery if: Known cancer with typical metastatic pattern, multiple skeletal lesions, characteristic imaging (renal, breast, lung, prostate patterns). Wrong diagnosis changes entire treatment approach.
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the life expectancy consideration in pathological fracture surgery?
A: Surgery indicated if expected survival greater than 6 weeks. Prognosis scoring (eg, Katagiri, PATHFx) helps estimate survival. Poor prognosis tumors: Lung, melanoma, hepatocellular. Better prognosis: Breast, prostate, renal (may survive years). Match surgical complexity to prognosis - endoprosthesis for long survivors, simple fixation for poor prognosis.
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the role of radiation in pathological fracture management?
A: Postoperative radiation (typically 8Gy single fraction or 30Gy/10 fractions) for: Tumor control, pain relief, prevention of progression. Not a substitute for adequate fixation. Begin 2-4 weeks post-op to allow wound healing. Preoperative radiation occasionally used for highly vascular tumors (renal) to reduce intraoperative bleeding.
Australian Context
Australian Epidemiology and Practice
Cancer Australia Epidemiology:
- Skeletal metastases affect approximately 30-40% of advanced cancer patients in Australia
- Breast cancer remains the most common primary source for bone metastases in Australian women
- Prostate cancer is the most common cause in Australian men
- Lung, renal, and thyroid cancers also frequently metastasize to bone
- Rising cancer incidence with aging population increases pathologic fracture burden
Australian Orthopaedic Oncology Services:
- Specialist bone tumour services located at major tertiary centres across Australia
- Major centres: Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Melbourne), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Sydney), Princess Alexandra Hospital (Brisbane), Royal Perth Hospital
- Multidisciplinary team approach mandated for complex oncology cases
- Access to tumour prostheses and custom implants through specialist suppliers
RACS Orthopaedic Training Relevance:
- Pathologic fracture management is a core FRACS examination topic
- Viva scenarios commonly test Mirels scoring, biopsy principles, and reconstruction decision-making
- Key exam focus: distinguishing prophylactic fixation indications, understanding prognosis by primary tumour type
- Examiners expect knowledge of staging workup sequence and multidisciplinary care principles
Australian Bone Tumour Guidelines:
- Bone Tumours Australia provides patient and clinician resources
- Australian and New Zealand Sarcoma Association (ANZSA) guidelines inform management
- State-based cancer networks coordinate care pathways
- Tumour registry data contributes to outcomes research
Radiation Oncology Considerations:
- Adjuvant radiation typically delivered 2-3 weeks post-operatively
- Australian radiation oncology services available at all major cancer centres
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) increasingly available for spinal metastases
- Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) research informs Australian practice
Prostheses and Implant Access:
- Tumour prostheses available through major orthopaedic implant companies
- Custom implants (3D printed, patient-specific) available for complex reconstructions
- Prostheses List determines private health insurance coverage
- Public hospital access to specialised implants through health service procurement
High-Yield Exam Summary
Mirels Score - Know Cold
- •Site: Upper limb (1), Lower limb (2), Peritrochanteric (3)
- •Pain: Mild (1), Moderate (2), Functional (3)
- •Lesion: Blastic (1), Mixed (2), Lytic (3)
- •Size: Less than 1/3 (1), 1/3-2/3 (2), Greater than 2/3 (3)
- •Score greater than or equal to 9 = Prophylactic fixation indicated
- •Score 8 = Individualized decision, consider fixation
- •Score less than or equal to 7 = Observation acceptable with monitoring
Biopsy Principles (Common Exam Question)
- •Biopsy before treatment EXCEPT: known metastatic disease with typical lesion, life/limb emergency
- •Coordinate with treating oncologic surgeon BEFORE biopsy
- •Biopsy tract must be excisable en bloc with tumor
- •Longitudinal incision in line with definitive surgery
- •Core needle preferred (80-90% diagnostic, minimal contamination)
- •Never violate adjacent compartments or joint
- •Mark tract with clip/suture for later excision
- •Whoops procedures devastate sarcoma outcomes
Surgical Construct Principles
- •Stabilize entire bone (nail) vs lesion only (plate)
- •Bypass lesion by minimum 2 cortical diameters each direction
- •Load-sharing (nail) preferred over load-bearing (plate)
- •Cement augmentation: immediate stability, thermal necrosis, improved screw purchase
- •Early weight-bearing priority (quality of life in palliative care)
- •Durability must match prognosis: short (less than 6m) simple, intermediate (6-12m) durable, long (greater than 12m) prosthesis
- •Nail advantages: minimally invasive, entire bone, allows radiation
- •Plate advantages: periarticular, allows curettage, upper extremity
Staging Workup Sequence
- •Radiographs: AP/lateral affected bone + joints above/below
- •Skeletal survey: multiple myeloma or identify additional lesions
- •CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: identify primary tumor, visceral mets
- •MRI affected bone: marrow involvement, soft tissue extent, skip lesions
- •Bone scan or PET-CT: systemic skeletal survey
- •Labs: CBC, CMP, LFTs, calcium, ALP, SPEP/UPEP, PSA (if appropriate)
- •Biopsy: tissue diagnosis (coordinate with oncologist)
- •MDT discussion: oncology, radiation oncology, radiology
Prognosis by Primary Tumor
- •Long survival (greater than 12m): Breast (ER+), Prostate, Thyroid, Myeloma
- •Intermediate (6-12m): Renal, Colon, Melanoma, Unknown primary
- •Short (less than 6m): Lung (especially small cell), Pancreas, Liver
- •Presence of visceral metastases cuts survival in half
- •Ambulatory status crucial predictor of functional recovery
- •Surgery improves quality of life but NOT survival duration
- •Use Katagiri score or similar to guide reconstruction durability
Complications to Discuss
- •Intraoperative: hemorrhage (hypervascular tumors - embolize), cement extravasation (joint/nerve), fracture propagation
- •Early: infection (5-15%, higher with chemo/radiation), wound dehiscence, VTE
- •Late: implant failure (5-15% at 1 year), nonunion (expected, construct must not rely on healing), local progression
- •Cement complications: thermal necrosis, embolization (rare, potentially fatal), joint penetration
- •Revision: escalate construct durability (plate to nail to prosthesis), higher complication rate, balance with prognosis
Special Situations
- •Pelvis/Acetabulum: Harrington classification (I-IV), Class III-IV need THA/custom implant
- •Spine: SINS score (greater than or equal to 13 unstable, needs fixation), vertebroplasty for compression fractures without instability
- •Pediatric: benign lesions common, fracture may induce healing (UBC), malignant needs multimodal treatment
- •Radiation: adjuvant post-op (2-3 weeks delay for wound healing), NOT substitute for fixation in high-risk lesions
- •Hypervascular tumors: renal, thyroid - preoperative embolization, crossmatch blood, anticipate hemorrhage
Prophylactic Fixation Reduces Complications vs Post-Fracture Fixation
Cement Augmentation Reduces Implant Failure
Intramedullary Nailing Superior to Plate Fixation for Diaphyseal Metastases
Quality of Life Improves After Surgical Stabilization Despite No Survival Benefit
Key References:
-
Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones: a proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(249):256-264.
-
Wedin R, Bauer HC, Wersäll P. Failures after operation for skeletal metastatic lesions of long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(358):128-139.
-
Harrington KD. The management of acetabular insufficiency secondary to metastatic malignant disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(4):653-664.
-
Steensma M, Boland PJ, Morris CD, Athanasian E, Healey JH. Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(3):920-926.
-
Weber KL, Lewis VO, Randall RL, et al. An approach to the management of patients with metastatic bone disease. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:663-676.