PET-CT in Orthopaedic Oncology
PET-CT Applications in Oncology
Staging: Whole body assessment for metastases
Response: Pre and post-treatment comparison
Recurrence: Detection of local or distant relapse
Biopsy guidance: Target metabolically active areas
Key: PET-CT is most valuable for high-grade malignancies and systemic staging
Critical Must-Knows
- FDG uptake reflects glucose metabolism (Warburg effect)
- High-grade tumours show higher FDG uptake than low-grade
- SUVmax is quantitative measure of uptake intensity
- PET-CT combines metabolic and anatomic information
- Used for staging, response assessment, and recurrence detection
Examiner's Pearls
- "Brain has high physiological FDG uptake (limits assessment)
- "Blood glucose must be controlled (less than 11 mmol/L)
- "False positives: infection, inflammation, recent surgery
- "Response: greater than 40% SUV decrease = metabolic response
- "Low-grade sarcomas may have minimal FDG uptake
Exam Warning
PET-CT is increasingly used in orthopaedic oncology. Know that FDG uptake reflects glucose metabolism, not malignancy directly. Understand the indications (staging, response, recurrence) and limitations (false positives with infection/inflammation, low sensitivity for low-grade tumours).
FDG-PET Principles
Warburg Effect
FDG-PET Protocol
| Step | Timing | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Patient preparation | 4-6 hours fasting | Blood glucose less than 11 mmol/L |
| FDG injection | Time 0 | 4-5 MBq/kg IV |
| Uptake period | 60 minutes | Rest, avoid talking/chewing |
| PET acquisition | 60 minutes post-injection | Whole body or regional |
| CT acquisition | Simultaneous or sequential | Low-dose for attenuation/localisation |
SUV = Standardised Uptake ValueSUV Interpretation
Memory Hook:SUV is affected by blood glucose level, body habitus, and timing - standardise conditions for response assessment
Indications in Orthopaedic Oncology
PET-CT for Tumour Staging
| Tumour Type | Role of PET-CT | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Osteosarcoma | Detect lung/distant metastases, skip lesions | Complements bone scan, CT chest |
| Ewing sarcoma | Systemic staging, marrow involvement | Very FDG-avid |
| Soft tissue sarcoma | Stage high-grade lesions, detect nodal/distant disease | Low-grade may not be FDG-avid |
| Chondrosarcoma | Grade assessment, dedifferentiation | Low-grade shows low uptake |
| Metastatic disease | Whole body survey, unknown primary | Complementary to bone scan |
Specific Tumour Applications
FDG Avidity by Tumour Type
| Tumour | FDG Avidity | Clinical Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Osteosarcoma | High | SUV correlates with histological response |
| Ewing sarcoma | Very high | Excellent for staging and response |
| High-grade STS | High | SUV predicts grade and outcome |
| Low-grade STS | Low to moderate | May not be reliably detected |
| Chondrosarcoma G1 | Low | Difficult to differentiate from enchondroma |
| Chondrosarcoma G2-3 | Moderate to high | Increased uptake suggests higher grade |
| GCT | Variable | Not reliably FDG-avid |
| Myeloma | Variable | FDG-PET useful for treatment response |
Osteosarcoma
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Limitations and Pitfalls
False Positives and Negatives
| Category | Cause | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| False positive | Infection/inflammation | Clinical correlation, follow-up |
| False positive | Recent surgery/biopsy | Wait 4-6 weeks post-procedure |
| False positive | Fracture healing | Correlate with history |
| False positive | Brown fat uptake | Patient warming, beta-blockers |
| False negative | Low-grade tumour | Limited sensitivity, MRI better |
| False negative | Small lesions (less than 1cm) | Resolution limits |
| False negative | Hyperglycaemia | Control glucose, repeat if needed |
Key Limitations
Comparison with Other Modalities
PET-CT vs Other Imaging for Bone Malignancy
| Feature | Bone Scan | PET-CT | MRI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Osteoblast activity | Glucose metabolism | Tissue characterisation |
| Whole body | Yes | Yes | Limited (WB-MRI emerging) |
| Anatomic detail | Poor | Good (CT component) | Excellent |
| Lytic metastases | May be cold | Usually positive | Positive (marrow) |
| Soft tissue | Limited | Good | Excellent |
| Response assessment | Limited | Good (SUV) | Moderate |
| Availability | Widely available | Limited centres | Widely available |
| Cost | Lower | Higher | Moderate |
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
"A 16-year-old with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma of the distal femur is being staged. The oncologist requests PET-CT."
"A patient with known high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh has PET-CT showing intense uptake in the primary tumour (SUVmax 12) and a 1.5cm inguinal lymph node with SUVmax 4."
"A patient with a cartilage tumour in the proximal humerus has PET-CT. The lesion shows SUVmax of 3.5."
PET-CT in Orthopaedic Oncology
High-Yield Exam Summary
FDG-PET Principles
- •FDG = Fluorodeoxyglucose (glucose analogue)
- •Warburg effect: Tumours use glycolysis
- •Higher grade = higher SUV generally
- •SUVmax = maximum standardised uptake value
Indications
- •Staging: Metastases, skip lesions
- •Response: SUV decrease greater than 30-40%
- •Recurrence: Symptomatic patients
- •Biopsy guidance: Target active areas
FDG Avidity by Tumour
- •High: Osteosarcoma, Ewing, high-grade STS
- •Variable: Chondrosarcoma (grade-dependent)
- •Low: Low-grade STS, enchondroma
Limitations
- •False +: Infection, inflammation, surgery
- •False -: Low-grade tumours, small lesions
- •Glucose control essential
- •Cannot replace biopsy for diagnosis