Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

PET-CT in Orthopaedic Oncology

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

PET-CT in Orthopaedic Oncology

Guide to PET-CT applications in orthopaedic oncology including staging, treatment response assessment, and detection of recurrence for fellowship exam preparation.

Medium Yield
complete
Updated: 2026-01-16
High Yield Overview

PET-CT in Orthopaedic Oncology

—Tracer
18F- FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose)
—Uptake Time
60minutes post-injection
18Half-life F-
110minutes
—SUV Threshold
2Variable, typically greater than .5

PET-CT Applications in Oncology

Staging: Whole body assessment for metastases

Response: Pre and post-treatment comparison

Recurrence: Detection of local or distant relapse

Biopsy guidance: Target metabolically active areas

Key: PET-CT is most valuable for high-grade malignancies and systemic staging

Critical Must-Knows

  • FDG uptake reflects glucose metabolism (Warburg effect)
  • High-grade tumours show higher FDG uptake than low-grade
  • SUVmax is quantitative measure of uptake intensity
  • PET-CT combines metabolic and anatomic information
  • Used for staging, response assessment, and recurrence detection

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Brain has high physiological FDG uptake (limits assessment)
  • "
    Blood glucose must be controlled (less than 11 mmol/L)
  • "
    False positives: infection, inflammation, recent surgery
  • "
    Response: greater than 40% SUV decrease = metabolic response
  • "
    Low-grade sarcomas may have minimal FDG uptake

Exam Warning

PET-CT is increasingly used in orthopaedic oncology. Know that FDG uptake reflects glucose metabolism, not malignancy directly. Understand the indications (staging, response, recurrence) and limitations (false positives with infection/inflammation, low sensitivity for low-grade tumours).

FDG-PET Principles

Warburg Effect

Malignant cells preferentially use glycolysis for energy (even in presence of oxygen). This increased glucose uptake is the basis for FDG-PET imaging. FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) is a glucose analogue that is taken up by cells but cannot be metabolised, becoming trapped. Higher-grade, more aggressive tumours typically have higher glucose metabolism and FDG uptake.

FDG-PET Protocol

StepTimingRequirements
Patient preparation4-6 hours fastingBlood glucose less than 11 mmol/L
FDG injectionTime 04-5 MBq/kg IV
Uptake period60 minutesRest, avoid talking/chewing
PET acquisition60 minutes post-injectionWhole body or regional
CT acquisitionSimultaneous or sequentialLow-dose for attenuation/localisation
Mnemonic

SUV = Standardised Uptake ValueSUV Interpretation

Q
Quantitative measure of FDG uptake
S
SUVmax: Maximum value in ROI (most commonly reported)
S
SUVmean: Average value in ROI
H
Higher SUV generally correlates with higher grade
T
Threshold varies but greater than 2.5 often used

Memory Hook:SUV is affected by blood glucose level, body habitus, and timing - standardise conditions for response assessment

Indications in Orthopaedic Oncology

PET-CT for Tumour Staging

Tumour TypeRole of PET-CTNotes
OsteosarcomaDetect lung/distant metastases, skip lesionsComplements bone scan, CT chest
Ewing sarcomaSystemic staging, marrow involvementVery FDG-avid
Soft tissue sarcomaStage high-grade lesions, detect nodal/distant diseaseLow-grade may not be FDG-avid
ChondrosarcomaGrade assessment, dedifferentiationLow-grade shows low uptake
Metastatic diseaseWhole body survey, unknown primaryComplementary to bone scan

Response Assessment

PET-CT can assess treatment response earlier than anatomic imaging. A decrease in SUVmax greater than 40% between pre and post-treatment scans indicates metabolic response. This may predict histological response and prognosis in sarcomas. Timing: Usually post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, before surgery.

PERCIST Response Criteria

CategoryDefinition
Complete metabolic responseResolution of all FDG-avid disease
Partial metabolic responseGreater than 30% decrease in SUV
Stable metabolic diseaseLess than 30% decrease or less than 30% increase
Progressive metabolic diseaseGreater than 30% increase or new lesions

Surveillance for Recurrence

PET-CT can detect local recurrence and distant metastases in sarcoma surveillance. More sensitive than conventional imaging for some recurrences. However, false positives from post-surgical changes and inflammation limit specificity. Usually reserved for symptomatic patients or elevated tumour markers rather than routine surveillance.

Specific Tumour Applications

FDG Avidity by Tumour Type

TumourFDG AvidityClinical Implications
OsteosarcomaHighSUV correlates with histological response
Ewing sarcomaVery highExcellent for staging and response
High-grade STSHighSUV predicts grade and outcome
Low-grade STSLow to moderateMay not be reliably detected
Chondrosarcoma G1LowDifficult to differentiate from enchondroma
Chondrosarcoma G2-3Moderate to highIncreased uptake suggests higher grade
GCTVariableNot reliably FDG-avid
MyelomaVariableFDG-PET useful for treatment response

Osteosarcoma

PET-CT useful for detecting skip lesions, distant metastases, and response assessment. Decrease in SUV post-chemotherapy correlates with histological necrosis (good prognostic factor). Sensitivity for lung metastases similar to CT chest.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma

High-grade lesions are FDG-avid; SUVmax greater than 6 predicts higher grade. Low-grade sarcomas (well-differentiated liposarcoma, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma) may have minimal uptake. PET helps detect nodal involvement in selected subtypes.

Limitations and Pitfalls

False Positives and Negatives

CategoryCauseMitigation
False positiveInfection/inflammationClinical correlation, follow-up
False positiveRecent surgery/biopsyWait 4-6 weeks post-procedure
False positiveFracture healingCorrelate with history
False positiveBrown fat uptakePatient warming, beta-blockers
False negativeLow-grade tumourLimited sensitivity, MRI better
False negativeSmall lesions (less than 1cm)Resolution limits
False negativeHyperglycaemiaControl glucose, repeat if needed

Key Limitations

PET-CT cannot reliably differentiate benign from malignant in all cases - infection, inflammation, and healing all cause FDG uptake. Low-grade malignancies may not be FDG-avid. Small lesions (less than 1cm) may be missed due to resolution limits. Brain assessment limited by high physiological uptake. Must control blood glucose for accurate results.

Comparison with Other Modalities

PET-CT vs Other Imaging for Bone Malignancy

FeatureBone ScanPET-CTMRI
MechanismOsteoblast activityGlucose metabolismTissue characterisation
Whole bodyYesYesLimited (WB-MRI emerging)
Anatomic detailPoorGood (CT component)Excellent
Lytic metastasesMay be coldUsually positivePositive (marrow)
Soft tissueLimitedGoodExcellent
Response assessmentLimitedGood (SUV)Moderate
AvailabilityWidely availableLimited centresWidely available
CostLowerHigherModerate

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 16-year-old with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma of the distal femur is being staged. The oncologist requests PET-CT."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
PET-CT in osteosarcoma staging has several roles: (1) Detection of skip lesions - separate tumour foci in the same bone, which affect surgical planning and prognosis. PET may detect skip lesions not seen on MRI. (2) Distant metastases - lung metastases (though CT chest is also needed for small nodules), bone metastases in other sites. (3) Baseline SUVmax - establishes pre-treatment metabolic activity for comparison after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (4) Response prediction - higher pre-treatment SUV paradoxically associated with better response to chemotherapy. I would look for: primary tumour FDG uptake and extent, any separate foci in the same bone (skip lesions), other bone involvement, nodal disease, and lung lesions.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Skip lesions affect staging and prognosis
Whole body assessment for metastases
Baseline SUV for response comparison
Complement with MRI (local extent) and CT chest (small lung mets)
High pre-treatment SUV may predict response
COMMON TRAPS
✗Relying only on PET for lung metastases (small nodules may be missed)
✗Not knowing about skip lesion detection
✗Forgetting baseline SUV importance for response
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A patient with known high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh has PET-CT showing intense uptake in the primary tumour (SUVmax 12) and a 1.5cm inguinal lymph node with SUVmax 4."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
The primary tumour shows high FDG uptake (SUVmax 12), consistent with high-grade sarcoma. The inguinal lymph node with SUVmax 4 is concerning for nodal metastasis, though lymph node metastases are uncommon in most soft tissue sarcomas (less than 5% overall). However, certain histological subtypes have higher nodal metastasis rates: synovial sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and angiosarcoma. The FDG-avid node should be biopsied or closely monitored. If confirmed as metastatic, this upstages the disease and affects prognosis and treatment planning. Alternative explanations for the node include reactive lymphadenopathy (infection, inflammation), so tissue confirmation is important before assuming metastatic disease.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Most STS have low rate of nodal mets (less than 5%)
Exceptions: synovial, epithelioid, clear cell, rhabdo, angiosarcoma
SUV 4 in node is suspicious but not diagnostic
Biopsy or close monitoring recommended
Nodal mets affect staging and prognosis
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming all FDG-avid nodes are metastatic
✗Not knowing which STS subtypes metastasise to nodes
✗Not recommending tissue confirmation
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A patient with a cartilage tumour in the proximal humerus has PET-CT. The lesion shows SUVmax of 3.5."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
FDG-PET can help differentiate benign from malignant cartilage lesions based on metabolic activity. Generally: Enchondromas have low FDG uptake (SUVmax typically less than 2). Low-grade (G1) chondrosarcomas have low to moderate uptake (often SUVmax 2-4). Higher-grade (G2-3) chondrosarcomas show higher uptake (SUVmax greater than 4-5). This patient's SUVmax of 3.5 is in an intermediate zone and concerning for at least low-grade chondrosarcoma. However, there is overlap between enchondroma and G1 chondrosarcoma, making PET alone insufficient for definitive diagnosis. Clinical context matters: symptoms (pain without fracture), location (axial vs appendicular), size, and imaging features (cortical destruction, soft tissue mass). This lesion warrants close follow-up or biopsy, as the SUV suggests it may not be a simple enchondroma.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Enchondroma: Low SUV (typically less than 2)
G1 chondrosarcoma: Low-moderate SUV (overlap zone)
G2-3 chondrosarcoma: Higher SUV (greater than 4-5)
SUV 3.5 is intermediate, concerning for low-grade malignancy
Clinical and imaging correlation essential
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using SUV alone to diagnose
✗Not recognising overlap between enchondroma and low-grade CS
✗Dismissing intermediate SUV as benign

PET-CT in Orthopaedic Oncology

High-Yield Exam Summary

FDG-PET Principles

  • •FDG = Fluorodeoxyglucose (glucose analogue)
  • •Warburg effect: Tumours use glycolysis
  • •Higher grade = higher SUV generally
  • •SUVmax = maximum standardised uptake value

Indications

  • •Staging: Metastases, skip lesions
  • •Response: SUV decrease greater than 30-40%
  • •Recurrence: Symptomatic patients
  • •Biopsy guidance: Target active areas

FDG Avidity by Tumour

  • •High: Osteosarcoma, Ewing, high-grade STS
  • •Variable: Chondrosarcoma (grade-dependent)
  • •Low: Low-grade STS, enchondroma

Limitations

  • •False +: Infection, inflammation, surgery
  • •False -: Low-grade tumours, small lesions
  • •Glucose control essential
  • •Cannot replace biopsy for diagnosis
Quick Stats
Reading Time32 min
Related Topics

Nuclear Medicine in Orthopaedics

Labelled White Cell Scanning for Infection

SPECT-CT: Orthopaedic Applications

Classic Radiological Signs: Tumours