Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Phalangeal Fractures

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Phalangeal Fractures

Comprehensive guide to proximal and middle phalanx fractures including classification, reduction techniques, fixation options, and rehabilitation for orthopaedic examination

complete
Updated: 2024-12-16

Phalangeal Fractures

High Yield Overview

Phalangeal Fractures

Proximal and middle phalanx fractures of the digits

Apex VolarPP Angulation
VariableMP Angulation
RotationKey Assessment
HighStiffness Risk

Fracture Types

Location
PatternBase / Shaft / Neck / Head
TreatmentAnatomic Reduction
Pattern
PatternTransverse / Oblique / Spiral
TreatmentStability Assessment

Critical Must-Knows

  • Rotational malunion is the most functionally limiting deformity
  • Check for scissoring - all fingers should point to scaphoid tubercle when flexed
  • PP apex volar angulation from intrinsic pull on proximal fragment
  • MP angulation varies - proximal apex volar (central slip), distal apex dorsal (FDS)

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Stable fractures: buddy tape + early motion
  • "
    Unstable: K-wires, screws, or plate fixation
  • "
    Unicondylar fractures often need ORIF to prevent angular deformity
  • "
    Stiffness is the enemy - mobilize early when fixation stable

Rotation is King!

Rotational Assessment

All fingertips should point to SCAPHOID TUBERCLE when flexed. Look for SCISSORING of digits. Even 5 degrees rotation = 1.5cm overlap at fingertip. Rotational malunion is FUNCTIONALLY DEVASTATING.

Angulation Assessment

Apex volar angulation at PP (intrinsics pull proximal fragment). Variable angulation at MP (FDS vs central slip). Less angulation tolerated in index/long (more visible). More tolerated in ring/small (compensatory CMC motion).

At a Glance

ScenarioDecisionRationale
Stable, non-displaced fractureBuddy tape + early motionLow risk of displacement
Any rotational deformityClosed reduction or ORIFCannot accept rotation
Transverse PP shaft fractureK-wires or plateHigh intrinsic deforming force
Short oblique/transverseK-wires (cross-pattern)Lag screws won't hold
Long spiral fractureLag screwsIdeal screw purchase
Comminuted fracturePlate +/- bone graftNeed to span comminution
Unicondylar head/neck fractureORIF with screwsPrevent angular deformity
Bicondylar fractureORIF with mini-condylar plateRestore articular surface
Open fractureIrrigation, debridement, stabilizationPrevent infection
Pilon-type base fractureConsider external fixationJoint distraction helpful

Mnemonics and Memory Aids

Mnemonic

PHALANXPHALANX Fracture Assessment

P
Position of fracture (base/shaft/neck/head)
H
Handedness and occupation of patient
A
Angulation (apex direction and degree)
L
Length (shortening assessment)
A
Any rotation (scissoring test)
N
Nerve/vessel status (digital exam)
X
X-ray (PA, lateral, oblique views)

Memory Hook:Assess the whole PHALANX before deciding treatment!

Mnemonic

SCISSORSCISSOR Test for Rotation

S
Scaphoid tubercle - all fingertips should point here
C
Check cascade in semiflexion
I
Individual finger exam in flexion
S
Side-to-side comparison essential
S
Subtle rotation causes significant overlap
O
Open reduction if cannot correct
R
Rotational malunion is devastating

Memory Hook:The SCISSOR test catches what others miss!

Mnemonic

APEXAPEX Direction by Location

A
At PP: APEX VOLAR (intrinsics pull proximal fragment into flexion)
P
Proximal MP: apex volar (central slip pulls)
E
Exact middle MP: minimal deformity (balanced forces)
X
X-tra distal MP: apex dorsal (FDS pulls middle fragment)

Memory Hook:Know your APEX direction for proper reduction!

Overview

Overview

Phalangeal fractures are among the most common upper extremity injuries, representing approximately 10% of all fractures. The proximal phalanx (PP) and middle phalanx (MP) present distinct management challenges due to the complex interplay of tendons, ligaments, and muscles surrounding each bone. Understanding the deforming forces acting on these fractures is essential for appropriate reduction and stable fixation.

The primary goal of treatment is to restore anatomic alignment, particularly rotation, while allowing early mobilization to prevent the stiffness that is the major cause of poor outcomes in these injuries. Even minor rotational malalignment can result in significant functional impairment, with scissoring of digits during grip and pinch activities. The hand surgeon's mantra "stable fracture, mobile joint" encapsulates the treatment philosophy.

Classification is based on bone involved (PP vs MP), location (base, shaft, neck, head), and fracture pattern (transverse, oblique, spiral, comminuted). Each combination has specific biomechanical implications that guide treatment selection.

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Proximal Phalanx Anatomy

Structural Features:

  • Broadest at base, tapers distally
  • Biconcave base articulates with MC head
  • Bicondylar head articulates with MP base
  • Rectangular cross-section (makes plating easier)

Tendon Relationships:

  • Extensor mechanism dorsal (conjoined lateral bands)
  • FDP tendon volar (in sheath)
  • Interossei insert on base (volar to axis)
  • Lumbricals cross volar to MCP joint

Deforming Forces - PP:

FragmentDeforming ForceResult
ProximalInterosseiFlexion
DistalCentral slip + lateral bandsExtension
ResultApex volar angulation

Middle Phalanx Anatomy

Structural Features:

  • Shortest phalanx
  • Base biconcave, head bicondylar
  • More tubular than PP

Tendon Relationships:

  • Central slip inserts on dorsal base
  • FDS splits and inserts on volar-lateral shaft
  • FDP passes between FDS slips
  • Lateral bands converge to form terminal tendon

Deforming Forces - MP:

Fracture LevelProximal PullDistal PullApex Direction
Proximal to FDSCentral slip (extension)FDS (flexion)Apex volar
Distal to FDSFDS (flexion)Terminal tendon (extension)Apex dorsal

Vascular Supply

Digital Arteries:

  • Proper digital arteries run along volar-lateral aspect
  • Nutrient arteries enter volar cortex
  • Periosteal stripping affects blood supply

Key Anatomical Points for Surgery

Safe Zones for K-wire Entry:

  • Dorsal approach between extensor and lateral bands
  • Avoid vincular system volarly
  • Protect digital nerves at lateral aspect

Plate Placement:

  • Lateral approach (between NV bundle and extensor)
  • Dorsal approach (beneath extensor)
  • Avoid volar plating (tendon adhesions)

Classification

Classification

Proximal Phalanx

LocationCharacteristicsTreatment Considerations
BaseOften intra-articularMay need ORIF for articular
ShaftStrong deforming forcesK-wire or plate
NeckCondylar fracturesOften need ORIF
HeadUnicondylar/bicondylarORIF for congruency

Middle Phalanx

LocationCharacteristicsTreatment Considerations
BaseOften pilon-typeMay need external fixation
ShaftFDS insertion affects apexVariable angulation
NeckRareReduction important
HeadOften associated with DIP injuryRare

Transverse Fractures

  • Perpendicular to long axis
  • Unstable due to lack of interdigitation
  • K-wire or plate fixation

Short Oblique Fractures

  • 30-45 degree angle
  • Unable to lag screw (too short)
  • K-wire or plate fixation

Long Oblique/Spiral Fractures

  • Greater than 45 degree angle
  • Amenable to lag screw fixation
  • 2-3 screws minimum

Comminuted Fractures

  • Multiple fragments
  • Plate fixation to bridge
  • May need bone graft

Treatment Approach: Comminuted fractures require bridge plating with fixation proximal and distal to the comminuted zone.

Unicondylar Fractures

  • Single condyle avulsed
  • Collateral ligament attached
  • Angular deformity if untreated
  • Require ORIF

Bicondylar Fractures

  • Both condyles separate
  • Articular comminution common
  • Mini-condylar plate often needed

Pilon Fractures (MP Base)

  • Impaction pattern
  • Central depression
  • May need external fixation with ligamentotaxis

Management Strategy: These challenging fractures often benefit from ligamentotaxis using distraction techniques.

AO/OTA Classification (Overview)

  • A: Extra-articular
  • B: Partial articular
  • C: Complete articular

Clinical Presentation

Clinical Presentation

History

Mechanism:

  • Direct blow (crush injury)
  • Axial load (ball-handling sports)
  • Twisting injury (spiral fractures)
  • Fall on outstretched hand
  • Industrial accidents

Key History Points:

  • Hand dominance
  • Occupation
  • Sports/activities
  • Previous hand injuries
  • Time since injury

Physical Examination

Inspection:

  • Swelling (localized vs diffuse)
  • Deformity (angulation, shortening)
  • Rotational malalignment
  • Skin integrity (open fracture?)
  • Nail bed alignment

Rotational Assessment - Critical:

  1. Semiflexion cascade: All fingertips should converge toward scaphoid tubercle
  2. Full flexion: Check for scissoring/overlap
  3. Finger extension: Assess nail plate alignment
  4. Compare to contralateral hand

Palpation:

  • Point tenderness at fracture site
  • Assess for crepitus (gentle)
  • Evaluate stability

Neurovascular Examination:

  • Digital sensation (radial and ulnar aspects)
  • Capillary refill
  • Allen test for digital arteries

Tendon Assessment:

  • FDP function (DIP flexion)
  • FDS function (isolated PIP flexion)
  • Extensor function
  • Note if pain limits assessment

Associated Injuries

  • Tendon avulsions (mallet, jersey finger)
  • Ligament injuries (collateral, volar plate)
  • Nerve injuries (digital nerve laceration)
  • Vascular injuries (in open fractures)
  • Nail bed injuries

Investigations

Investigations

Radiographic Assessment

Standard Views:

  1. PA (posteroanterior): Fracture pattern, shortening
  2. True lateral: Angulation, displacement
  3. Oblique: Rotational assessment, condylar fractures

Key Radiographic Assessment:

  • Fracture location (base/shaft/neck/head)
  • Fracture pattern (transverse/oblique/spiral)
  • Angulation (degree and apex direction)
  • Shortening
  • Articular involvement
  • Bone quality
PA hand X-ray showing proximal phalanx fracture
Click to expand
PA (posteroanterior) hand X-ray demonstrating a proximal phalanx fracture of the small finger (arrow). This standard view allows assessment of fracture pattern, shortening, and alignment. True lateral and oblique views are also required to fully evaluate angulation and rotation.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

CT Imaging

Indications:

  • Articular fractures (condylar, pilon)
  • Complex comminuted patterns
  • Surgical planning
  • Unclear fracture pattern on XR

CT Advantages:

  • 3D reconstruction
  • Fragment number and size
  • Articular surface assessment
  • Guide surgical approach

MRI (Limited Role)

  • Suspected ligament injury
  • Occult fractures
  • Tendon pathology
  • Not routine for fractures

Ultrasound

  • Dynamic tendon assessment
  • Soft tissue masses
  • Guided injections

Management Algorithm

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Phalangeal fractures treatment algorithm flowchart
Click to expand
Treatment algorithm for phalangeal fractures: First assess rotation (any rotation requires surgery), then select fixation based on fracture pattern - K-wires/plate for transverse, lag screws for spiral, bridge plating for comminuted.Credit: OrthoVellum

Non-Operative Treatment

Indications:

  • Stable, non-displaced fractures
  • Acceptable alignment maintained
  • No rotational deformity
  • Patient compliance expected

Techniques:

1. Buddy Taping:

  • Tape affected finger to adjacent finger
  • Provides stability through adjacent digit
  • Allows early motion
  • Ideal for stable fractures

2. Extension Block Splinting:

  • For base fractures with dorsal angulation
  • MCP in 70-90 degrees flexion
  • Prevents dorsal displacement

3. Alumifoam Splint:

  • Custom molded
  • Immobilizes fracture
  • Allows motion of unaffected joints

Protocol:

  • Immobilization: 3-4 weeks
  • Begin ROM exercises early when stable
  • Buddy tape for protection 4-6 weeks total
  • Hand therapy referral for optimal outcomes

Key Success Factor: Early mobilization when fracture stable prevents stiffness complications.

Operative Treatment

Surgical Indications:

  • Rotational deformity
  • Unacceptable angulation
  • Shortening greater than 3mm
  • Intra-articular fractures (displaced)
  • Unstable fracture pattern
  • Open fractures
  • Multiple fractures
  • Associated tendon/ligament injury

Fixation Selection Principles:

Choose fixation based on fracture pattern:

  • Transverse/short oblique: K-wires or plate
  • Long spiral: Lag screws (2-3 minimum)
  • Comminuted: Plate to bridge
  • Condylar: ORIF with screws or mini-plate

Critical Decision Point: Any rotational malalignment mandates surgical intervention regardless of fracture pattern.

Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation

Indications: Transverse, short oblique, pediatric

Techniques:

  • Cross K-wires (most stable)
  • Longitudinal K-wires (less stable)
  • Bouquet technique (multiple wires)

Advantages:

  • Minimal soft tissue dissection
  • Simple removal
  • Cost-effective

Disadvantages:

  • Pin site infection
  • Pin migration
  • May need external protection

Technical Points:

  • Cross wires provide better rotational control
  • Cut and bend wires outside skin
  • Remove at 3-4 weeks

Post-Fixation Care: Pin site monitoring and early motion of adjacent joints while fracture protected.

Lag Screw Fixation

Indications: Long oblique/spiral fractures (length at least 2x diameter)

Technique:

  • 1.5mm or 2.0mm cortical screws
  • Minimum 2 screws (preferably 3)
  • Perpendicular to fracture line
  • Lag technique for compression

Advantages:

  • Excellent compression
  • May allow early motion
  • Low profile

Disadvantages:

  • Limited to specific patterns
  • Technically demanding

Critical Technical Points:

  • Screws perpendicular to FRACTURE line (not bone axis)
  • Minimum 2 screws for rotational control
  • Engage 6 cortices minimum per screw

Biomechanical Principle: Compression across fracture site promotes primary bone healing and allows early motion.

Plate Fixation

Indications: Transverse, comminuted, multiple fractures

Options:

  • 1.5mm or 2.0mm mini-plates
  • Condylar plates (head fractures)
  • Lateral or dorsal placement

Approaches:

  • Lateral: Between NV bundle and extensor (PREFERRED)
  • Dorsal: Split extensor mechanism
  • Volar: AVOID (tendon adhesions)

Advantages:

  • Strongest fixation
  • Allows immediate motion
  • Good for comminution

Disadvantages:

  • More soft tissue dissection
  • Tendon adhesions possible
  • Hardware prominence

Technical Considerations:

  • 3 screws proximal and distal to fracture minimum
  • Bicortical purchase essential
  • Contour plate carefully to bone

Key Advantage: Rigid fixation allows immediate active motion, reducing stiffness risk significantly.

External Fixation

Indications: Severely comminuted, open fractures, pilon-type

Technique:

  • Mini-external fixator
  • Pins in adjacent bone/phalanx
  • Distraction for ligamentotaxis

Advantages:

  • Minimal soft tissue trauma
  • Ligamentotaxis for reduction
  • Good for severe comminution

Protocol:

  • Maintain distraction for 3-4 weeks
  • May allow early motion with dynamic frame
  • Remove when fracture sticky (4-6 weeks)

Indication Rationale: Used when internal fixation not feasible due to severe soft tissue injury or bone loss.

Surgical Approaches

Dorsal Approach:

  1. Longitudinal incision over phalanx
  2. Identify extensor mechanism
  3. Split between central slip and lateral bands (PP)
  4. Direct access to dorsal cortex

Lateral Approach (Preferred):

  1. Mid-lateral incision
  2. Identify NV bundle (volar)
  3. Identify lateral band (dorsal)
  4. Access between structures
  5. Less extensor tendon dissection

Key Principles:

  • Preserve extensor mechanism when possible
  • Protect digital nerves
  • Avoid volar approach (tendon adhesions)

Approach Selection: Lateral approach preferred for most plating to minimize extensor mechanism trauma and adhesion risk.

Surgical Technique

Surgical Technique

Cross K-Wire Pattern (Most Stable)

  1. Setup: Fluoroscopy, mini C-arm, 0.045" or 0.062" K-wires
  2. Reduction: Achieve closed reduction, hold with reduction forceps
  3. First wire: Insert dorsal-lateral, aim distal-medial, cross fracture site
  4. Second wire: Insert dorsal-medial, aim distal-lateral, cross first wire
  5. Check: PA and lateral fluoroscopy for reduction and wire position
  6. Finish: Cut and bend wires outside skin, apply dressing

Intramedullary Bouquet Technique

  1. Used for transverse fractures
  2. Multiple 0.028" K-wires inserted retrograde from fracture site
  3. Drive across fracture into proximal fragment
  4. Provides rotational and angular stability
  5. Wires buried beneath skin

Advantage: Wires buried beneath skin, reducing pin site infection risk compared to percutaneous technique.

Indications

Long oblique/spiral fractures (length at least 2x diameter)

Technique

  1. Approach: Lateral approach to visualize fracture
  2. Reduction: Anatomic reduction with bone clamps
  3. Provisional fixation: 0.028" K-wire for temporary stability
  4. Screw selection: 1.5mm or 2.0mm cortical screws
  5. Drilling: Gliding hole in near cortex, thread hole in far cortex
  6. Screw insertion: Perpendicular to fracture line, 2-3 screws minimum
  7. Compression: Tighten sequentially for interfragmentary compression
  8. Check: Fluoroscopy for reduction, rotation assessment

Key Technical Points

  • Screws perpendicular to fracture (not to bone axis)
  • Minimum 2 screws (preferably 3) for rotational stability
  • Engage 6 cortices minimum per screw
  • Check rotation before and after fixation

Critical Success Factors: Achieving adequate compression and rotational control depends on proper screw placement and number.

Indications

Transverse, short oblique, comminuted fractures

Lateral Plating Technique

  1. Incision: Mid-lateral incision over phalanx
  2. Dissection:
    • Identify NV bundle (retract volarly)
    • Identify lateral band (retract dorsally)
    • Expose lateral cortex
  3. Reduction: Reduce fracture, hold with bone clamps
  4. Plate selection: 1.5mm or 2.0mm mini-plate
  5. Plate application:
    • Contour plate to lateral surface
    • 3 screws proximal and distal to fracture minimum
    • Bicortical screw purchase
  6. Closure: Careful soft tissue closure, avoid tension

Dorsal Plating Technique

  1. Incision: Dorsal longitudinal incision
  2. Extensor mechanism: Split centrally or between central slip and lateral band
  3. Plate application: Low-profile plate on dorsal surface
  4. Risk: Extensor tendon adhesions (consider lateral approach instead)

Condylar Plating Technique

For head fractures:

  1. Mini-condylar plates (L-shaped or T-shaped)
  2. Restore articular congruency first
  3. Provisional K-wire fixation
  4. Apply plate to support reconstruction
  5. Lag screws for condylar fragments

Critical Goal: Anatomic articular reduction prevents post-traumatic arthritis and joint stiffness.

Indications

Severe comminution, open fractures, pilon-type

Technique

  1. Frame selection: Mini-external fixator or dynamic fixator
  2. Pin placement:
    • Proximal pins in metacarpal or proximal phalanx base
    • Distal pins in distal phalanx or middle phalanx
  3. Reduction: Ligamentotaxis through distraction
  4. Fixation: Lock frame in reduced position
  5. Dynamic protocol: May allow early motion through hinged frame

Key Principle: Ligamentotaxis uses soft tissue tension to reduce and maintain alignment in severely comminuted patterns.

Complications

Complications

Early Complications

Malreduction:

  • Rotational most significant
  • May require revision fixation
  • Prevention better than treatment

Infection:

  • Higher risk with open fractures
  • Pin site infection with K-wires
  • Deep infection rare with proper technique

Neurovascular Injury:

  • Digital nerve during approach
  • Vascular compromise (rare)

Fixation Failure:

  • Screw loosening
  • K-wire migration
  • Plate failure in comminuted fractures

Late Complications

Stiffness:

  • MOST COMMON complication
  • Affects PIP joint primarily
  • Results from:
    • Prolonged immobilization
    • Tendon adhesions
    • Capsular contracture
  • Prevention: early motion

Malunion:

  • Rotational most functionally significant
  • Angulation may be tolerated
  • May require corrective osteotomy

Nonunion:

  • Uncommon in phalanges
  • Risk factors: comminution, infection, motion at fracture
  • Treatment: bone graft + rigid fixation

Post-Traumatic Arthritis:

  • After articular fractures
  • Risk proportional to articular incongruity
  • May need arthrodesis

Tendon Adhesions:

  • Common after dorsal surgery
  • Extensor lag or flexion loss
  • May need tenolysis

Cold Intolerance:

  • Common in first year
  • Usually improves

Comparison of Complication Risk

ComplicationK-wireScrewPlate
Pin track infectionHighN/AN/A
StiffnessLow-ModLowModerate
Tendon adhesionLowLowHigher
Hardware removalCommonRareSometimes

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Care

Week 0-1: Protection Phase

Goals:

  • Wound healing
  • Control edema
  • Protect fixation

Protocol:

  • Splint protection (volar slab with MCP in flexion)
  • Hand elevation above heart level
  • Ice therapy 20 minutes every 2 hours
  • Digital ROM exercises if fixation is rigid (plate/screws)
  • K-wire cases: splint immobilization
  • Monitor for infection (increased pain, erythema, drainage)

Wound Care:

  • Dressing change at 2-3 days
  • Suture removal at 10-14 days
  • Pin site care (K-wires): daily cleaning with chlorhexidine

Week 1-3: Early Motion Phase

Goals:

  • Prevent stiffness
  • Maintain reduction
  • Progress ROM

Protocol:

  • Remove sutures at 10-14 days
  • Hand therapy referral
  • Active ROM exercises:
    • MCP, PIP, DIP flexion/extension
    • Tendon gliding exercises
    • Place and hold exercises
  • Avoid passive stretching initially
  • Splint between exercises
  • Edema control: compression glove, elevation, retrograde massage

K-Wire Management:

  • Continue splint protection
  • Active ROM of adjacent joints
  • Pin site monitoring

Week 3-6: Progressive Motion Phase

Goals:

  • Increase ROM
  • Begin light functional use
  • Remove K-wires if used

Protocol:

  • Remove K-wires at 3-4 weeks (when fracture sticky)
  • Increase frequency of ROM exercises
  • Begin passive ROM (gentle)
  • Dynamic splinting if stiffness developing:
    • Extension turnbuckle for PIP flexion contracture
    • Flexion strap for extension lag
  • Light functional activities
  • Buddy taping for protection

Radiographic Follow-up:

  • XR at K-wire removal to confirm alignment maintained
  • Check for callus formation

Week 6-12: Strengthening Phase

Goals:

  • Restore grip strength
  • Return to function
  • Maximize ROM

Protocol:

  • Progressive strengthening exercises:
    • Putty exercises (soft to firm progression)
    • Gripper exercises
    • Functional activities
  • Sport-specific training
  • Work conditioning program
  • Continue ROM exercises to plateau

Return to Activities:

  • Desk work: 1-2 weeks (with protection)
  • Light manual work: 6-8 weeks
  • Heavy manual work: 10-12 weeks
  • Contact sports: 10-12 weeks (with protection initially)

Hardware Removal

Indications for Removal:

  • Symptomatic hardware (prominence, pain)
  • Patient request
  • Plate/screw removal: generally only if symptomatic

Timing:

  • K-wires: 3-4 weeks routine
  • Screws/plates: after fracture consolidation (12+ weeks) if needed

Red Flags Requiring Review

  • Increasing pain after initial improvement
  • Loss of reduction on radiographs
  • Signs of infection (erythema, purulent drainage, fever)
  • Worsening stiffness despite therapy
  • Neurovascular compromise
  • Pin migration or loosening

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcomes and Prognosis

Prognostic Factors

Good Prognosis:

  • Simple fracture pattern
  • Anatomic reduction (especially rotation)
  • Early motion achieved
  • Young patient
  • Single digit involved

Poor Prognosis:

  • Comminuted fracture
  • Residual rotation
  • Prolonged immobilization
  • Index/long finger (less CMC compensation)
  • Multiple digit involvement
  • Associated soft tissue injury

Expected Outcomes by Fixation

Conservative Treatment:

  • 90% good/excellent for stable fractures
  • ROM typically 80-90% of contralateral
  • Minimal grip strength deficit

K-Wire Fixation:

  • 80-85% good/excellent
  • Stiffness main complication
  • Slight grip strength reduction

Screw/Plate Fixation:

  • 85-90% good/excellent
  • Best ROM preservation
  • Hardware issues may require removal

Return to Activity

ActivityTimeframe
Desk work1-2 weeks (with splint)
Light manual work6-8 weeks
Heavy manual work10-12 weeks
Contact sports10-12 weeks
Full grip strength3-6 months

Evidence and Guidelines

Evidence Base

Rotational Malalignment Impact

III
Gross et al. • Journal of Hand Surgery American (1985)
Key Findings:
  • 5 degrees of rotational malalignment results in approximately 1.5cm of digital overlap during grip, causing significant functional impairment
Clinical Implication: No rotational deformity is acceptable - must correct all rotation

K-Wire vs Plate Fixation

II
Horton et al. • Journal of Hand Surgery European (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Plate fixation resulted in earlier return of motion but higher rate of extensor lag compared to K-wire fixation
Clinical Implication: Select fixation based on fracture pattern and patient factors

Early Motion After Stable Fixation

IV
Freeland et al. • Hand Clinics (1994)
Key Findings:
  • Early motion protocols after stable internal fixation resulted in better ROM outcomes than prolonged immobilization
Clinical Implication: Stable fracture, mobile joint - early motion prevents stiffness

Unicondylar Fracture Outcomes

IV
Weiss et al. • Journal of Hand Surgery American (1998)
Key Findings:
  • Displaced unicondylar fractures treated with ORIF had significantly better outcomes than those treated closed, with lower malunion rate
Clinical Implication: Displaced condylar fractures benefit from surgical fixation

Stiffness Prevention

V
Swanson • AAOS Instructional Course Lectures (1990)
Key Findings:
  • Immobilization beyond 3 weeks significantly increases risk of stiffness at the PIP joint following phalangeal fracture
Clinical Implication: Minimize immobilization time - 3 weeks maximum when possible

Viva Questions

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old carpenter presents with a spiral fracture of the proximal phalanx of his ring finger sustained while using a power tool. There is 20 degrees of apex volar angulation and you suspect rotational malalignment. Describe your assessment and management."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Key Discussion Points:

  • Rotational malalignment is NEVER acceptable - must correct surgically
  • Spiral fractures: ideal for lag screw fixation (2-3 screws minimum)
  • Rule: spiral length should be at least 2x bone diameter for screws
  • PP apex volar angulation from intrinsic pull on proximal fragment
  • Carpenter - needs full function for occupation
  • Lateral approach: between NV bundle and lateral band
  • Post-op: early motion to prevent stiffness
  • Hand therapy critical for optimal outcome
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Rotational malalignment NEVER accepted
Spiral fractures need lag screws (2x diameter length)
Correct deforming forces (PP apex volar)
Early mobilization prevents stiffness
COMMON TRAPS
✗Accepting 'minor' rotation on exam
✗Using lag screws for short oblique fractures
✗Delaying therapy referral
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What specific test confirms rotation?"
"Why is 5 degrees of rotation significant?"
"When would you plate this instead?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

EXAMINER

"Explain the deforming forces acting on proximal phalanx fractures and why the apex of angulation is volar."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Key Discussion Points:

  • Interosseous muscles insert on volar aspect of PP base
  • Lumbricals also pass volar to MCP axis
  • These FLEX the proximal fragment
  • Central slip and lateral bands attach to distal fragment
  • Extensor mechanism EXTENDS the distal fragment
  • Result: proximal fragment flexes, distal extends
  • Creates APEX VOLAR angulation
  • Reduction: MCP flexion relaxes intrinsics, easier reduction
  • Immobilization: intrinsic-plus position (MCP 70°, IP extended)
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Interossei flex proximal fragment
Central slip extends distal fragment
Result is Apex Volar angulation at PP
Reduction requires MCP flexion to relax intrinsics
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing PP (apex volar) with MP (variable)
✗Forgetting the role of intrinsic muscles
✗Splinting with MCP extended (tightens collaterals)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How does the deforming force change at the middle phalanx?"
"Why do we splint in the intrinsic-plus position?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

EXAMINER

"A patient presents 3 weeks after injury with a stiff PIP joint following a middle phalanx shaft fracture that was treated in a splint. The fracture is uniting. What are the causes of stiffness and how would you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER

Key Discussion Points:

  • Stiffness is most common complication of phalangeal fractures
  • PIP joint particularly prone to stiffness
  • Causes: immobilization, edema, capsular contracture, tendon adhesions
  • Prevention better than treatment: early motion when stable
  • Immobilization beyond 3 weeks increases stiffness risk
  • Treatment: hand therapy is cornerstone (ROM, splinting, scar management)
  • Dynamic splinting: constant gentle force more effective than aggressive therapy
  • Surgical options: capsulotomy, tenolysis (after 6 months if plateau)
  • This case: 3 weeks immobilization is borderline - start therapy now
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Stiffness is #1 complication
Immobilization greater than 3 weeks is risk factor
Hand therapy is first line
Dynamic splinting effective (low load, long duration)
Surgery (tenolysis) only if plateau greater than 6 months
COMMON TRAPS
✗Aggressive passive stretching (causes inflammation)
✗Operating too early for stiffness
✗Ignoring the role of edema control
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the principle of dynamic splinting?"
"When is tenolysis indicated?"
"How does edema contribute to stiffness?"

MCQ Practice Points

MCQ Practice Points

High-Yield Facts

Rotational Malalignment - The Deal Breaker

Q: Why is rotational malalignment the most critical assessment? A: 5° rotation = 1.5cm fingertip overlap - Even minor rotation causes functional scissoring. Unlike angulation, rotation does not remodel and causes permanent impairment. All fingertips must point to the scaphoid tubercle.

Deforming Forces - Know Your Apex

Q: What is the typical deformity of a proximal phalanx fracture? A: Apex Volar - The interossei flex the proximal fragment, while the central slip extends the distal fragment. Reduction requires flexing the MCP joint to relax the intrinsics.

Fixation Rules - Spiral vs Transverse

Q: When is lag screw fixation indicated? A: Long spiral fractures (greater than 2x bone diameter) - Requires sufficient length for 2-3 screws. Short oblique or transverse fractures require K-wires or plating as screws won't hold.

Stiffness - The Enemy

Q: what is the most common complication of phalangeal fractures? A: PIP Joint Stiffness - Risk increases significantly with immobilization greater than 3 weeks. The goal of fixation is "stable fracture, mobile joint" to allow immediate motion.

Surgical Approach Hazards

Q: Why is the volar approach avoided for phalangeal plating? A: Tendon Adhesions - The flexor tendons (FDS/FDP) are prone to adherence to the plate, causing stiffness. Lateral (preferred) or dorsal approaches are safer.

Unicondylar Fractures

Q: How must displaced unicondylar fractures be treated? A: ORIF - These are unstable intra-articular fractures. Without fixation, the condyle displaces proximally, causing angular deformity and arthritis.

Common Exam Traps

Trap 1: Accepting small rotational deformity

  • WRONG: "5 degrees is minor"
  • RIGHT: NO rotation acceptable (5° = 1.5cm overlap)

Trap 2: Using lag screws for short oblique fractures

  • WRONG: Screws for all oblique fractures
  • RIGHT: Need length at least 2x diameter for screw purchase

Trap 3: Volar approach for plating

  • WRONG: Direct access to fracture
  • RIGHT: NEVER volar (massive tendon adhesions)

Trap 4: Prolonged immobilization

  • WRONG: "Immobilize 6 weeks for healing"
  • RIGHT: Maximum 3 weeks if possible, early motion critical

Trap 5: Ignoring deforming forces

  • WRONG: Just reduce the fracture
  • RIGHT: Must understand apex direction (PP = volar, MP = variable)

Australian Context

Australian Context

Healthcare Access

Phalangeal fractures are commonly managed in both public and private sectors in Australia. Emergency departments provide initial assessment and reduction, with hand surgery consultation for complex fractures. Public hand clinics offer specialized care for fractures requiring surgery, though wait times can vary by location.

Hand Therapy Services

Early hand therapy referral is essential for optimal outcomes. Public hospital hand therapy services are available but may have waitlists. Private hand therapy is widely accessible in metropolitan areas, with many patients choosing private services to expedite rehabilitation. Workers' compensation cases typically receive priority access to therapy services.

Surgical Hardware and Costs

Mini-fragment fixation sets (1.5mm and 2.0mm plates and screws) are standard in Australian hospitals. These implants are not subsidized by the PBS as they are surgical prostheses. In the public system, hardware costs are covered by the hospital. Private patients may face out-of-pocket costs for implants depending on their insurance coverage. K-wires remain a cost-effective option and are universally available.

Workers' Compensation Considerations

Phalangeal fractures are common workplace injuries in Australia. WorkCover schemes in each state cover medical treatment, rehabilitation, and income support during recovery. Hand surgeons should provide detailed medical reports documenting injury mechanism, treatment, and expected recovery timeline. Return-to-work planning should consider the patient's specific occupational demands.

Medicolegal Documentation

Thorough documentation of rotational alignment and neurovascular status is essential. Progress notes should clearly document range of motion measurements and functional limitations. For compensation cases, independent medical examinations may be requested to assess impairment using standardized assessment tools.

Exam Cheat Sheet

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Phalangeal Fractures - Key Points

High-Yield Exam Summary

Critical Assessment

  • •ROTATION - most important (check scissoring)
  • •All fingertips point to scaphoid tubercle in flexion
  • •5 degrees rotation = 1.5cm fingertip overlap
  • •No rotation is acceptable

Deforming Forces

  • •PP: apex VOLAR (intrinsics flex proximal fragment)
  • •MP proximal to FDS: apex volar (central slip)
  • •MP distal to FDS: apex dorsal (FDS pulls)
  • •MCP flexion relaxes intrinsics for reduction

Fixation Selection

  • •Stable: buddy tape + early motion
  • •Transverse/short oblique: K-wires or plate
  • •Long spiral: lag screws (2-3 minimum)
  • •Comminuted: plate to bridge

Complications

  • •Stiffness - MOST COMMON complication
  • •Prevention: early motion when stable
  • •Malunion - rotational most significant
  • •Adhesions - avoid volar plating

Quick Reference: Key Numbers

ParameterValue
PP angulation acceptable10-15°
MP angulation acceptable15-20°
Rotation acceptableNONE (0°)
5° rotation overlap1.5cm at tip
Max immobilization3 weeks ideal
Lag screw minimum2 (prefer 3)
Spiral length for screwat least 2x diameter
Return to full activity10-12 weeks
Quick Stats
Reading Time86 min
Related Topics

Bennett's Fractures

Rolando's Fractures

Thumb UCL Injuries (Gamekeeper's/Skier's Thumb)

Acetabular Fractures