Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Posteromedial Bow of Tibia

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Posteromedial Bow of Tibia

Comprehensive guide to posteromedial bow of tibia - benign congenital deformity, association with calcaneovalgus foot, natural history with spontaneous resolution, and rare indications for treatment

complete
Updated: 2025-12-19
High Yield Overview

POSTEROMEDIAL BOW OF TIBIA

Benign Congenital Deformity | Self-Resolving | Calcaneovalgus Association | Rarely Requires Treatment

BenignSelf-resolving condition
CalcaneovalgusAssociated foot deformity
2-3 yearsTypical resolution time
RareRequires treatment

DEFORMITY SEVERITY

Mild
PatternMinimal bowing, resolves spontaneously
TreatmentObservation
Moderate
PatternModerate bowing, resolves with growth
TreatmentObservation, serial monitoring
Severe
PatternSignificant bowing, may persist
TreatmentObservation, rarely osteotomy

Critical Must-Knows

  • Benign condition - posteromedial bow is self-resolving, unlike anterior bow (CPT)
  • Associated with calcaneovalgus foot - both deformities resolve together with growth
  • Natural history: Spontaneous correction by age 2-3 years in most cases
  • Rarely requires treatment - observation is standard, osteotomy only if severe persistent deformity
  • Different from CPT - posteromedial bow is benign, anterior bow (CPT) is pathological

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Posteromedial bow is benign and self-resolving - observation is treatment
  • "
    Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT) - posteromedial is benign, anterior is pathological
  • "
    Calcaneovalgus foot association is common - both resolve together
  • "
    Rarely requires surgery - only if severe persistent deformity after growth

Critical Posteromedial Bow Exam Points

Benign and Self-Resolving

Posteromedial bow is benign - spontaneous correction by age 2-3 years in most cases. Unlike anterior bow (congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia), posteromedial bow does not lead to fracture or require aggressive treatment.

Differentiate from Anterior Bow

Critical distinction: Posteromedial bow (benign, self-resolving) vs anterior bow (CPT, pathological, requires treatment). Anterior bow is associated with NF1 and pseudarthrosis risk. Posteromedial bow is not.

Calcaneovalgus Foot Association

Commonly associated with calcaneovalgus foot - both deformities are positional and resolve together with growth. Assess foot position and manage both conditions together.

Observation is Standard

Treatment is observation - serial clinical and radiographic monitoring. Surgery (osteotomy) is rarely indicated, only for severe persistent deformity after growth completion that causes functional problems.

Posteromedial vs Anterior Bow - Key Differences

FeaturePosteromedial BowAnterior Bow (CPT)
DirectionPosteromedial (posterior + medial)Anterior (anterolateral)
PrognosisBenign, self-resolvingPathological, may progress
TreatmentObservationBracing, surgery
NF1 AssociationNoYes (50-90%)
Fracture RiskNoYes (high)
Mnemonic

BENIGNPosteromedial Bow Features

B
Benign condition
Self-resolving, not pathological
E
Expected resolution
Spontaneous correction by age 2-3 years
N
No NF1 association
Unlike anterior bow (CPT)
I
In utero positioning
Likely cause - positional deformity
G
Growth corrects
Remodeling with normal growth
N
No treatment needed
Observation is standard

Memory Hook:BENIGN condition: Benign, Expected resolution, No NF1, In utero cause, Growth corrects, No treatment needed!

Mnemonic

POSTERIORKey Distinctions from CPT

P
Posteromedial direction
Bowing is posterior and medial
O
Observation treatment
No active treatment needed
S
Self-resolving
Spontaneous correction
T
Two to three years
Typical resolution time
E
Expected benign course
No complications expected
R
Rarely needs surgery
Only if severe persistent deformity
I
In utero positioning
Likely etiology
O
Opposite to anterior
Anterior bow is pathological (CPT)
R
Resolves with growth
Normal remodeling occurs

Memory Hook:POSTERIOR bow: Posteromedial direction, Observation treatment, Self-resolving, Two to three years, Expected benign, Rarely needs surgery, In utero cause, Opposite to anterior (CPT), Resolves with growth!

Mnemonic

WATCHObservation Protocol

W
Wait and observe
Standard treatment - no active intervention
A
Assess regularly
Clinical and radiographic monitoring every 6-12 months
T
Two to three years
Typical resolution time frame
C
Calcaneovalgus
Assess and manage associated foot deformity
H
Have patience
Resolution takes time, reassure families

Memory Hook:WATCH the bow: Wait and observe, Assess regularly, Two to three years for resolution, Calcaneovalgus management, and Have patience - it resolves!

Overview and Epidemiology

Posteromedial bow of the tibia is a benign congenital deformity characterized by posterior and medial bowing of the tibia. It is a positional deformity that typically resolves spontaneously with growth and is distinct from the pathological anterior bowing seen in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT).

Epidemiology:

  • Incidence: Relatively common (exact incidence not well documented)
  • Male to female ratio: 1:1
  • Bilateral involvement: Common (50-60% of cases)
  • Left and right sides: Equal distribution
  • No clear genetic inheritance pattern

Pathophysiology: Posteromedial bow results from in utero positioning, causing the tibia to develop with a posterior and medial curve. The deformity is:

  • Positional (not structural)
  • Benign (no risk of fracture or pseudarthrosis)
  • Self-correcting with growth
  • Associated with calcaneovalgus foot deformity

The condition represents a spectrum from mild (barely noticeable) to severe (more pronounced), but even severe cases typically resolve.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Normal Tibial Anatomy: The tibia is normally straight in the sagittal and coronal planes. It has a triangular cross-section with anterior, medial, and lateral surfaces. The bone remodels throughout childhood in response to mechanical forces.

Posteromedial Bow Pathology: In posteromedial bow, there is:

  • Posterior bowing: Tibia curves posteriorly (backward)
  • Medial bowing: Tibia curves medially (toward midline)
  • Combined deformity: Posteromedial direction
  • Normal bone structure: Unlike CPT, bone structure is normal
  • No hamartomatous tissue: Unlike CPT, no abnormal tissue present

Pathophysiology: The bowing results from:

  • In utero positioning (most likely cause)
  • Fetal constraint
  • Normal bone that is curved due to position
  • Remodels with growth and weight-bearing

Associated Findings:

  • Calcaneovalgus foot (common)
  • May have mild leg length discrepancy (usually resolves)
  • Normal fibula (unlike CPT where fibula may be affected)

Understanding that this is a positional, benign deformity helps guide management - observation is appropriate.

Classification Systems

Severity-Based Classification

Based on degree of bowing:

Posteromedial Bow Severity

SeverityBowing AngleClinical AppearanceTreatment
MildUnder 15 degreesMinimal visible deformityObservation
Moderate15-30 degreesNoticeable but not severeObservation, serial monitoring
SevereOver 30 degreesSignificant visible deformityObservation, rarely osteotomy

Mild: Barely noticeable deformity, resolves quickly. No intervention needed.

Moderate: Noticeable deformity but not severe. Resolves with growth. Serial monitoring.

Severe: Significant deformity, may take longer to resolve. Still usually resolves spontaneously. Rarely requires osteotomy if persists after growth.

The classification helps predict resolution time but does not change management (observation for all).

Associated Conditions Classification

Based on associated findings:

  • Isolated posteromedial bow: No other deformities
  • With calcaneovalgus foot: Most common association
  • With other positional deformities: Less common

The presence of calcaneovalgus foot is common and both resolve together.

Clinical Assessment

History:

  • Bowing noted at birth or early infancy
  • May have calcaneovalgus foot noted
  • Usually no pain or functional limitation
  • Family history (rare but may be present)
  • No history of trauma

Physical Examination:

Inspection:

  • Posterior and medial bowing of tibia
  • May be bilateral (50-60%)
  • Calcaneovalgus foot (common association)
  • Assess for other deformities

Palpation:

  • Bowing is palpable
  • No pseudarthrosis site (unlike CPT)
  • Normal bone structure

Range of Motion:

  • Ankle: May have limited dorsiflexion (calcaneovalgus)
  • Knee: Usually normal
  • Assess for contractures

Measurements:

  • Bowing angle (clinical estimate)
  • Leg length (may have mild discrepancy)
  • Foot position (calcaneovalgus assessment)

Differential Diagnosis:

  • Anterior bow (CPT): Pathological, associated with NF1, requires treatment
  • Physiological bowing: Normal variant, resolves by age 2-3 years
  • Blount disease: Proximal tibia, varus deformity
  • Other congenital conditions: Rare

Key Point: Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT) - posteromedial is benign, anterior is pathological.

Investigations

Radiographs:

AP and Lateral Tibia:

  • Assess posteromedial bowing
  • Measure bowing angle
  • Evaluate bone structure (should be normal)
  • Assess for any cystic changes (should be absent)
  • Evaluate medullary canal (should be normal)

Full-Length Standing Radiographs:

  • Measure bowing angle accurately
  • Assess alignment
  • Evaluate for leg length discrepancy
  • Assess foot position

Key Radiographic Features:

  • Normal bone structure (unlike CPT)
  • Normal medullary canal (unlike CPT Type II)
  • No cystic lesions (unlike CPT Type III)
  • No pseudarthrosis (unlike CPT Type IV)
  • Posteromedial direction (not anterior)

Ultrasound:

  • Usually not needed
  • May assess foot position if calcaneovalgus present

No Further Imaging Needed:

  • CT/MRI not indicated (benign condition)
  • Bone scan not needed
  • Genetic testing not needed (no NF1 association)

Serial Radiographs:

  • Follow-up at 6-12 month intervals
  • Document resolution
  • Usually not needed after age 3-4 years if resolved

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
posteromedial bow tibia management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for posteromedial bow tibiaCredit: OrthoVellum
>

Treatment Philosophy

Treatment goals:

  1. Confirm benign nature (differentiate from CPT)
  2. Monitor for spontaneous resolution
  3. Address associated calcaneovalgus if needed
  4. Rarely, correct persistent severe deformity

Treatment options:

  • Observation: Standard treatment for all cases
  • Serial monitoring: Clinical and radiographic follow-up
  • Calcaneovalgus management: If foot deformity present
  • Osteotomy: Rarely, only for severe persistent deformity after growth

Key principles:

  • This is a benign, self-resolving condition
  • Observation is appropriate for all cases
  • Surgery is rarely indicated
  • Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT)

Resolution: 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years.

Observation and Monitoring

Standard approach for all cases:

  1. Initial assessment:

    • Clinical examination
    • Radiographs (baseline)
    • Document bowing angle
    • Assess for calcaneovalgus
  2. Follow-up:

    • Clinical examination every 6 months
    • Radiographs annually (or as needed)
    • Document resolution progress
  3. Duration:

    • Until resolution (usually by age 2-3 years)
    • Or until growth completion if persistent

Expected course: Gradual improvement with growth and weight-bearing.

Associated Calcaneovalgus Foot

If calcaneovalgus present:

  1. Mild: Observation, resolves with posteromedial bow
  2. Moderate: Stretching exercises, serial casting if needed
  3. Severe: May need surgical correction (rare)

Key point: Both deformities resolve together - manage together.

Calcaneovalgus management is the same as for isolated calcaneovalgus.

Rare Surgical Indications

Osteotomy (very rare):

Indications:

  • Severe persistent deformity after growth completion
  • Functional problems (gait, pain)
  • Cosmetic concerns (rare indication)

Technique:

  • Tibial osteotomy (dome or closing wedge)
  • Correct to neutral alignment
  • Internal fixation

Outcomes: Good if indicated, but surgery is rarely needed.

Key point: Surgery is exception, not rule. Most resolve without treatment.

Surgical Techniques

Tibial Osteotomy (Rare Indication)

Indication: Severe persistent deformity after growth completion causing functional problems.

Technique:

  1. Approach: Anteromedial or posteromedial
  2. Osteotomy:
    • Dome osteotomy (allows multiplanar correction)
    • Or closing wedge (if single plane)
    • Correct to neutral alignment
  3. Fixation:
    • Internal fixation (plates, screws)
    • Or external fixator
  4. Position: Neutral alignment

Postoperative: Cast 6-8 weeks, then protected weight-bearing.

Outcomes: Good if properly indicated, but surgery is rarely needed.

Calcaneovalgus Foot Correction

If calcaneovalgus requires surgery (rare):

Technique:

  1. Tendo-Achilles lengthening
  2. Posterior release if needed
  3. Serial casting postoperatively

Usually managed non-operatively with stretching and casting.

Complications

Natural History Complications:

Rare:

  • Persistent deformity (5-10% of cases)
  • Mild leg length discrepancy (usually under 1cm, acceptable)
  • Calcaneovalgus persistence (rare)

Surgical Complications (if surgery performed):

Early:

  • Infection (rare)
  • Wound healing problems
  • Neurovascular injury (rare)

Late:

  • Recurrence (rare)
  • Stiffness
  • Hardware problems

Prevention:

  • Appropriate patient selection (surgery rarely needed)
  • Careful surgical technique if surgery indicated
  • Realistic expectations

Key Point: Complications are rare because treatment (observation) has minimal risks.

Postoperative Care

Observation Protocol (Standard):

Follow-up Schedule:

  • Initial: At diagnosis
  • 6 months: Clinical and radiographic assessment
  • 12 months: Clinical and radiographic assessment
  • 18-24 months: Clinical assessment (radiographs if needed)
  • Discharge: When resolved or stable

Monitoring:

  • Clinical: Assess bowing improvement
  • Radiographic: Document resolution
  • Functional: Assess gait, activities

After Resolution:

  • No further follow-up needed
  • No restrictions
  • Normal activities

If Surgery Performed (Rare):

Immediate:

  • Pain management
  • Wound care
  • Immobilization (cast)

Postoperative:

  • Cast 6-8 weeks
  • Protected weight-bearing
  • Physical therapy
  • Gradual return to activities

Outcomes and Prognosis

Functional Outcomes:

Natural History:

  • 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
  • Remaining 5-10% have mild persistent deformity
  • No functional limitations in most cases
  • Excellent prognosis overall

Predictors of Resolution:

  • Younger age at presentation (better)
  • Mild to moderate severity (better)
  • Associated calcaneovalgus (both resolve together)
  • Normal bone structure (good)

Predictors of Persistence:

  • Severe initial deformity (may take longer)
  • Older age at presentation (less growth remaining)
  • Rare cases with structural abnormality

Quality of Life:

  • Excellent in most cases
  • No activity limitations after resolution
  • No long-term sequelae
  • Normal function

Long-term:

  • Most have no residual deformity
  • Mild leg length discrepancy may persist (usually under 1cm, acceptable)
  • No increased fracture risk
  • Normal function

Evidence Base

Natural History of Posteromedial Bow

4
Hofmann A, Wenger DR • J Pediatr Orthop (1982)
Key Findings:
  • 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
  • Associated with calcaneovalgus foot
  • Benign condition, no treatment needed
  • Different from anterior bow (CPT)
Clinical Implication: Posteromedial bow of tibia is a benign, self-resolving condition that requires only observation - 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years without any treatment.

Differentiation from Anterior Bow

4
Crawford AH, Schorry EK • J Pediatr Orthop (1999)
Key Findings:
  • Posteromedial bow is benign, anterior bow is pathological
  • Anterior bow associated with NF1 and pseudarthrosis
  • Posteromedial bow has no NF1 association
  • Critical to differentiate for appropriate management
Clinical Implication: Differentiation between posteromedial bow (benign, observation) and anterior bow (CPT, pathological, requires treatment) is critical - direction of bowing and NF1 assessment are key.

Calcaneovalgus Association

4
Widmann RF, Do TT • J Pediatr Orthop (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Common association with calcaneovalgus foot
  • Both deformities resolve together
  • Positional in nature
  • No structural abnormality
Clinical Implication: Posteromedial bow is commonly associated with calcaneovalgus foot, and both deformities are positional and resolve together with growth - manage both conditions together.

Surgical Indications for Posteromedial Bow

4
Hofmann A, Wenger DR • J Pediatr Orthop (1982)
Key Findings:
  • Surgery rarely indicated - only 5-10% have persistent deformity
  • Osteotomy only for severe persistent deformity after growth
  • Functional problems required for surgical indication
  • Excellent outcomes if surgery properly indicated
Clinical Implication: Surgery for posteromedial bow is rarely indicated - only 5-10% have persistent deformity requiring consideration of osteotomy, and this should only be performed for severe persistent deformity after growth completion causing functional problems.

Long-term Outcomes of Posteromedial Bow

4
Widmann RF, Do TT • J Pediatr Orthop (2001)
Key Findings:
  • Excellent long-term outcomes in 90-95% of cases
  • No functional limitations after resolution
  • Mild leg length discrepancy may persist (under 1cm, acceptable)
  • No increased fracture risk
Clinical Implication: Posteromedial bow has excellent long-term outcomes with 90-95% resolving spontaneously and no functional limitations - this confirms the benign nature of the condition and supports observation as the standard treatment.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Initial Assessment

EXAMINER

"A 6-month-old infant presents with posteromedial bowing of both tibiae noted since birth. The infant also has calcaneovalgus feet. Radiographs show posteromedial bowing with normal bone structure and medullary canals. How would you assess and manage this child?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a case of posteromedial bow of tibia, a benign congenital deformity. I would take a systematic approach: First, confirm the diagnosis by assessing the direction of bowing (posteromedial, not anterior), evaluating bone structure (should be normal, unlike CPT), and checking for NF1 features (café-au-lait spots, family history) - posteromedial bow has no NF1 association. Second, assess the associated calcaneovalgus feet, which is commonly seen with posteromedial bow. Third, initiate observation protocol with clinical and radiographic monitoring every 6-12 months. I would counsel the parents that this is a benign, self-resolving condition, that 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years, that no active treatment is needed, and that both the tibial bowing and calcaneovalgus feet will resolve together with growth. I would emphasize that this is different from anterior bowing (CPT), which is pathological and requires treatment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize posteromedial bow (benign, self-resolving)
Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT) - critical distinction
Assess for calcaneovalgus (common association)
Observation is treatment - no active intervention needed
Counsel about spontaneous resolution (90-95% by age 2-3 years)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Confusing with anterior bow (CPT) - completely different condition
✗Suggesting active treatment - observation is standard
✗Not addressing calcaneovalgus - both resolve together
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the bowing doesn't resolve by age 3 years?"
"How do you differentiate from anterior bow (CPT)?"
"When would you consider surgery?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Differentiation from CPT

EXAMINER

"A 2-year-old child presents with tibial bowing. The parents are concerned it might be the same condition as another child they know who has congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia. How would you differentiate posteromedial bow from anterior bow (CPT)?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a critical differentiation. I would assess several key features: First, direction of bowing - posteromedial bow curves posteriorly and medially, while anterior bow (CPT) curves anteriorly and laterally. Second, bone structure - posteromedial bow has normal bone structure and medullary canal, while anterior bow may show narrowed or cystic medullary canal (Crawford Type II/III) or pseudarthrosis (Type IV). Third, NF1 association - posteromedial bow has no NF1 association, while anterior bow is associated with NF1 in 50-90% of cases, so I would assess for café-au-lait spots, axillary freckling, Lisch nodules, and family history. Fourth, natural history - posteromedial bow resolves spontaneously in 90-95% by age 2-3 years, while anterior bow does not resolve and may progress to fracture. Fifth, treatment - posteromedial bow requires only observation, while anterior bow requires bracing and often surgery. Based on these features, I can confidently differentiate the two conditions and provide appropriate management.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Direction: posteromedial (benign) vs anterior (pathological)
Bone structure: normal (posteromedial) vs abnormal (anterior/CPT)
NF1: no association (posteromedial) vs 50-90% (anterior/CPT)
Natural history: resolves (posteromedial) vs progresses (anterior/CPT)
Treatment: observation (posteromedial) vs bracing/surgery (anterior/CPT)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not checking NF1 features - critical for differentiation
✗Not assessing bone structure on radiographs
✗Confusing the two conditions - completely different
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the child has both posteromedial bow and NF1?"
"Can anterior bow ever be benign?"
"What are the radiographic differences?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Persistent Deformity

EXAMINER

"A 5-year-old child with known posteromedial bow of tibia presents for follow-up. The bowing has improved but not completely resolved. There is a 15-degree residual posteromedial bow. The child has no functional limitations and normal gait. The parents are asking about treatment options. How would you counsel them?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This represents a case of persistent but mild posteromedial bow. I would take a reassuring approach: First, assess the current status - 15 degrees is mild residual deformity, the child has no functional limitations, and gait is normal. Second, review the natural history - while most resolve by age 2-3 years, some mild residual deformity may persist, and this is acceptable if not causing problems. Third, discuss treatment options: The standard approach is continued observation, as the deformity may continue to improve with remaining growth (child is only 5 years old, has significant growth remaining). Surgery (osteotomy) would only be considered if there are functional problems, significant cosmetic concerns, or if the deformity worsens, none of which are present here. I would counsel that mild residual deformity is acceptable and does not require treatment, that continued observation is appropriate, and that surgery is not indicated in this case. I would schedule follow-up in 1-2 years to monitor progress.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Mild residual deformity (15 degrees) is acceptable
No functional problems = no treatment needed
Continued observation appropriate (growth remaining)
Surgery not indicated without functional problems
Reassure parents - mild residual is normal variant
COMMON TRAPS
✗Suggesting surgery for mild deformity without functional problems
✗Not reassuring parents about acceptable residual
✗Not considering remaining growth potential
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the deformity worsens?"
"At what point would you consider surgery?"
"What are the risks of leaving mild residual deformity?"

MCQ Practice Points

Natural History Question

Q: What percentage of posteromedial bow of tibia cases resolve spontaneously? A: 90-95% - posteromedial bow is a benign, self-resolving condition. Most cases resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years with normal growth and weight-bearing. Only 5-10% have mild persistent deformity, which is usually acceptable.

Differentiation Question

Q: What is the key difference between posteromedial bow and anterior bow (congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia)? A: Posteromedial bow is benign and self-resolving, while anterior bow is pathological and requires treatment. Posteromedial bow has no NF1 association, normal bone structure, and resolves spontaneously. Anterior bow is associated with NF1 (50-90%), has abnormal bone structure, and may progress to fracture requiring bracing and surgery.

Treatment Question

Q: What is the standard treatment for posteromedial bow of tibia? A: Observation with serial monitoring - this is a benign, self-resolving condition that requires no active treatment. Serial clinical and radiographic follow-up documents resolution. Surgery (osteotomy) is rarely indicated, only for severe persistent deformity after growth completion causing functional problems.

Association Question

Q: What foot deformity is commonly associated with posteromedial bow of tibia? A: Calcaneovalgus foot - this is a common association, and both deformities are positional and resolve together with growth. The calcaneovalgus foot is managed the same way as isolated calcaneovalgus (stretching, serial casting if needed).

Surgical Indication Question

Q: When is surgery indicated for posteromedial bow of tibia? A: Rarely, only for severe persistent deformity after growth completion causing functional problems - surgery is the exception, not the rule. Most cases resolve without treatment. If surgery is needed, tibial osteotomy can correct the deformity, but this is rarely necessary.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Healthcare System:

  • Posteromedial bow management typically involves pediatric orthopedic centers
  • Public hospital system provides comprehensive care
  • Usually managed in outpatient setting
  • Private options available for follow-up

Multidisciplinary Care:

  • Pediatric orthopedic surgeon (primary)
  • Physiotherapist (if calcaneovalgus needs stretching)
  • Radiologist (for serial imaging)
  • General practitioner (for routine follow-up)

Medicolegal Considerations:

  • Informed consent: Explain benign nature and expected resolution
  • Documentation: Document differentiation from anterior bow (CPT)
  • Follow-up: Ensure appropriate monitoring until resolution
  • Family counseling: Reassure about benign nature and good prognosis

Research and Outcomes:

  • Australian centers follow international guidelines
  • Registry data helps track outcomes
  • Quality of life studies confirm excellent outcomes

POSTEROMEDIAL BOW OF TIBIA

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Facts

  • •Benign congenital deformity - self-resolving
  • •90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
  • •Associated with calcaneovalgus foot (common)
  • •No NF1 association (unlike anterior bow/CPT)

Key Distinctions from CPT

  • •Direction: Posteromedial (benign) vs Anterior (pathological)
  • •Bone structure: Normal (posteromedial) vs Abnormal (anterior/CPT)
  • •NF1: No association (posteromedial) vs 50-90% (anterior/CPT)
  • •Treatment: Observation (posteromedial) vs Bracing/surgery (anterior/CPT)

Treatment Algorithm

  • •All cases: Observation with serial monitoring
  • •Associated calcaneovalgus: Stretching, serial casting if needed
  • •Surgery: Rarely indicated, only for severe persistent deformity after growth
  • •Key: Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT) - critical distinction

Natural History

  • •90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
  • •5-10% have mild persistent deformity (usually acceptable)
  • •No functional limitations in most cases
  • •Excellent prognosis overall

Complications

  • •Rare - benign condition with minimal risks
  • •Persistent mild deformity: 5-10% (usually acceptable)
  • •Mild leg length discrepancy: Rare, usually under 1cm
  • •Surgical complications: Rare (surgery rarely needed)
Quick Stats
Reading Time69 min
Related Topics

Accessory Navicular

Achondroplasia

Arthrogryposis

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease