POSTEROMEDIAL BOW OF TIBIA
Benign Congenital Deformity | Self-Resolving | Calcaneovalgus Association | Rarely Requires Treatment
DEFORMITY SEVERITY
Critical Must-Knows
- Benign condition - posteromedial bow is self-resolving, unlike anterior bow (CPT)
- Associated with calcaneovalgus foot - both deformities resolve together with growth
- Natural history: Spontaneous correction by age 2-3 years in most cases
- Rarely requires treatment - observation is standard, osteotomy only if severe persistent deformity
- Different from CPT - posteromedial bow is benign, anterior bow (CPT) is pathological
Examiner's Pearls
- "Posteromedial bow is benign and self-resolving - observation is treatment
- "Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT) - posteromedial is benign, anterior is pathological
- "Calcaneovalgus foot association is common - both resolve together
- "Rarely requires surgery - only if severe persistent deformity after growth
Critical Posteromedial Bow Exam Points
Benign and Self-Resolving
Posteromedial bow is benign - spontaneous correction by age 2-3 years in most cases. Unlike anterior bow (congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia), posteromedial bow does not lead to fracture or require aggressive treatment.
Differentiate from Anterior Bow
Critical distinction: Posteromedial bow (benign, self-resolving) vs anterior bow (CPT, pathological, requires treatment). Anterior bow is associated with NF1 and pseudarthrosis risk. Posteromedial bow is not.
Calcaneovalgus Foot Association
Commonly associated with calcaneovalgus foot - both deformities are positional and resolve together with growth. Assess foot position and manage both conditions together.
Observation is Standard
Treatment is observation - serial clinical and radiographic monitoring. Surgery (osteotomy) is rarely indicated, only for severe persistent deformity after growth completion that causes functional problems.
Posteromedial vs Anterior Bow - Key Differences
| Feature | Posteromedial Bow | Anterior Bow (CPT) |
|---|---|---|
| Direction | Posteromedial (posterior + medial) | Anterior (anterolateral) |
| Prognosis | Benign, self-resolving | Pathological, may progress |
| Treatment | Observation | Bracing, surgery |
| NF1 Association | No | Yes (50-90%) |
| Fracture Risk | No | Yes (high) |
BENIGNPosteromedial Bow Features
Memory Hook:BENIGN condition: Benign, Expected resolution, No NF1, In utero cause, Growth corrects, No treatment needed!
POSTERIORKey Distinctions from CPT
Memory Hook:POSTERIOR bow: Posteromedial direction, Observation treatment, Self-resolving, Two to three years, Expected benign, Rarely needs surgery, In utero cause, Opposite to anterior (CPT), Resolves with growth!
WATCHObservation Protocol
Memory Hook:WATCH the bow: Wait and observe, Assess regularly, Two to three years for resolution, Calcaneovalgus management, and Have patience - it resolves!
Overview and Epidemiology
Posteromedial bow of the tibia is a benign congenital deformity characterized by posterior and medial bowing of the tibia. It is a positional deformity that typically resolves spontaneously with growth and is distinct from the pathological anterior bowing seen in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT).
Epidemiology:
- Incidence: Relatively common (exact incidence not well documented)
- Male to female ratio: 1:1
- Bilateral involvement: Common (50-60% of cases)
- Left and right sides: Equal distribution
- No clear genetic inheritance pattern
Pathophysiology: Posteromedial bow results from in utero positioning, causing the tibia to develop with a posterior and medial curve. The deformity is:
- Positional (not structural)
- Benign (no risk of fracture or pseudarthrosis)
- Self-correcting with growth
- Associated with calcaneovalgus foot deformity
The condition represents a spectrum from mild (barely noticeable) to severe (more pronounced), but even severe cases typically resolve.
Pathophysiology and Mechanisms
Normal Tibial Anatomy: The tibia is normally straight in the sagittal and coronal planes. It has a triangular cross-section with anterior, medial, and lateral surfaces. The bone remodels throughout childhood in response to mechanical forces.
Posteromedial Bow Pathology: In posteromedial bow, there is:
- Posterior bowing: Tibia curves posteriorly (backward)
- Medial bowing: Tibia curves medially (toward midline)
- Combined deformity: Posteromedial direction
- Normal bone structure: Unlike CPT, bone structure is normal
- No hamartomatous tissue: Unlike CPT, no abnormal tissue present
Pathophysiology: The bowing results from:
- In utero positioning (most likely cause)
- Fetal constraint
- Normal bone that is curved due to position
- Remodels with growth and weight-bearing
Associated Findings:
- Calcaneovalgus foot (common)
- May have mild leg length discrepancy (usually resolves)
- Normal fibula (unlike CPT where fibula may be affected)
Understanding that this is a positional, benign deformity helps guide management - observation is appropriate.
Classification Systems
Severity-Based Classification
Based on degree of bowing:
Posteromedial Bow Severity
| Severity | Bowing Angle | Clinical Appearance | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Under 15 degrees | Minimal visible deformity | Observation |
| Moderate | 15-30 degrees | Noticeable but not severe | Observation, serial monitoring |
| Severe | Over 30 degrees | Significant visible deformity | Observation, rarely osteotomy |
Mild: Barely noticeable deformity, resolves quickly. No intervention needed.
Moderate: Noticeable deformity but not severe. Resolves with growth. Serial monitoring.
Severe: Significant deformity, may take longer to resolve. Still usually resolves spontaneously. Rarely requires osteotomy if persists after growth.
The classification helps predict resolution time but does not change management (observation for all).
Clinical Assessment
History:
- Bowing noted at birth or early infancy
- May have calcaneovalgus foot noted
- Usually no pain or functional limitation
- Family history (rare but may be present)
- No history of trauma
Physical Examination:
Inspection:
- Posterior and medial bowing of tibia
- May be bilateral (50-60%)
- Calcaneovalgus foot (common association)
- Assess for other deformities
Palpation:
- Bowing is palpable
- No pseudarthrosis site (unlike CPT)
- Normal bone structure
Range of Motion:
- Ankle: May have limited dorsiflexion (calcaneovalgus)
- Knee: Usually normal
- Assess for contractures
Measurements:
- Bowing angle (clinical estimate)
- Leg length (may have mild discrepancy)
- Foot position (calcaneovalgus assessment)
Differential Diagnosis:
- Anterior bow (CPT): Pathological, associated with NF1, requires treatment
- Physiological bowing: Normal variant, resolves by age 2-3 years
- Blount disease: Proximal tibia, varus deformity
- Other congenital conditions: Rare
Key Point: Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT) - posteromedial is benign, anterior is pathological.
Investigations
Radiographs:
AP and Lateral Tibia:
- Assess posteromedial bowing
- Measure bowing angle
- Evaluate bone structure (should be normal)
- Assess for any cystic changes (should be absent)
- Evaluate medullary canal (should be normal)
Full-Length Standing Radiographs:
- Measure bowing angle accurately
- Assess alignment
- Evaluate for leg length discrepancy
- Assess foot position
Key Radiographic Features:
- Normal bone structure (unlike CPT)
- Normal medullary canal (unlike CPT Type II)
- No cystic lesions (unlike CPT Type III)
- No pseudarthrosis (unlike CPT Type IV)
- Posteromedial direction (not anterior)
Ultrasound:
- Usually not needed
- May assess foot position if calcaneovalgus present
No Further Imaging Needed:
- CT/MRI not indicated (benign condition)
- Bone scan not needed
- Genetic testing not needed (no NF1 association)
Serial Radiographs:
- Follow-up at 6-12 month intervals
- Document resolution
- Usually not needed after age 3-4 years if resolved
Management Algorithm

Treatment Philosophy
Treatment goals:
- Confirm benign nature (differentiate from CPT)
- Monitor for spontaneous resolution
- Address associated calcaneovalgus if needed
- Rarely, correct persistent severe deformity
Treatment options:
- Observation: Standard treatment for all cases
- Serial monitoring: Clinical and radiographic follow-up
- Calcaneovalgus management: If foot deformity present
- Osteotomy: Rarely, only for severe persistent deformity after growth
Key principles:
- This is a benign, self-resolving condition
- Observation is appropriate for all cases
- Surgery is rarely indicated
- Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT)
Resolution: 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years.
Surgical Techniques
Tibial Osteotomy (Rare Indication)
Indication: Severe persistent deformity after growth completion causing functional problems.
Technique:
- Approach: Anteromedial or posteromedial
- Osteotomy:
- Dome osteotomy (allows multiplanar correction)
- Or closing wedge (if single plane)
- Correct to neutral alignment
- Fixation:
- Internal fixation (plates, screws)
- Or external fixator
- Position: Neutral alignment
Postoperative: Cast 6-8 weeks, then protected weight-bearing.
Outcomes: Good if properly indicated, but surgery is rarely needed.
Complications
Natural History Complications:
Rare:
- Persistent deformity (5-10% of cases)
- Mild leg length discrepancy (usually under 1cm, acceptable)
- Calcaneovalgus persistence (rare)
Surgical Complications (if surgery performed):
Early:
- Infection (rare)
- Wound healing problems
- Neurovascular injury (rare)
Late:
- Recurrence (rare)
- Stiffness
- Hardware problems
Prevention:
- Appropriate patient selection (surgery rarely needed)
- Careful surgical technique if surgery indicated
- Realistic expectations
Key Point: Complications are rare because treatment (observation) has minimal risks.
Postoperative Care
Observation Protocol (Standard):
Follow-up Schedule:
- Initial: At diagnosis
- 6 months: Clinical and radiographic assessment
- 12 months: Clinical and radiographic assessment
- 18-24 months: Clinical assessment (radiographs if needed)
- Discharge: When resolved or stable
Monitoring:
- Clinical: Assess bowing improvement
- Radiographic: Document resolution
- Functional: Assess gait, activities
After Resolution:
- No further follow-up needed
- No restrictions
- Normal activities
If Surgery Performed (Rare):
Immediate:
- Pain management
- Wound care
- Immobilization (cast)
Postoperative:
- Cast 6-8 weeks
- Protected weight-bearing
- Physical therapy
- Gradual return to activities
Outcomes and Prognosis
Functional Outcomes:
Natural History:
- 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
- Remaining 5-10% have mild persistent deformity
- No functional limitations in most cases
- Excellent prognosis overall
Predictors of Resolution:
- Younger age at presentation (better)
- Mild to moderate severity (better)
- Associated calcaneovalgus (both resolve together)
- Normal bone structure (good)
Predictors of Persistence:
- Severe initial deformity (may take longer)
- Older age at presentation (less growth remaining)
- Rare cases with structural abnormality
Quality of Life:
- Excellent in most cases
- No activity limitations after resolution
- No long-term sequelae
- Normal function
Long-term:
- Most have no residual deformity
- Mild leg length discrepancy may persist (usually under 1cm, acceptable)
- No increased fracture risk
- Normal function
Evidence Base
Natural History of Posteromedial Bow
- 90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
- Associated with calcaneovalgus foot
- Benign condition, no treatment needed
- Different from anterior bow (CPT)
Differentiation from Anterior Bow
- Posteromedial bow is benign, anterior bow is pathological
- Anterior bow associated with NF1 and pseudarthrosis
- Posteromedial bow has no NF1 association
- Critical to differentiate for appropriate management
Calcaneovalgus Association
- Common association with calcaneovalgus foot
- Both deformities resolve together
- Positional in nature
- No structural abnormality
Surgical Indications for Posteromedial Bow
- Surgery rarely indicated - only 5-10% have persistent deformity
- Osteotomy only for severe persistent deformity after growth
- Functional problems required for surgical indication
- Excellent outcomes if surgery properly indicated
Long-term Outcomes of Posteromedial Bow
- Excellent long-term outcomes in 90-95% of cases
- No functional limitations after resolution
- Mild leg length discrepancy may persist (under 1cm, acceptable)
- No increased fracture risk
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Scenario 1: Initial Assessment
"A 6-month-old infant presents with posteromedial bowing of both tibiae noted since birth. The infant also has calcaneovalgus feet. Radiographs show posteromedial bowing with normal bone structure and medullary canals. How would you assess and manage this child?"
Scenario 2: Differentiation from CPT
"A 2-year-old child presents with tibial bowing. The parents are concerned it might be the same condition as another child they know who has congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia. How would you differentiate posteromedial bow from anterior bow (CPT)?"
Scenario 3: Persistent Deformity
"A 5-year-old child with known posteromedial bow of tibia presents for follow-up. The bowing has improved but not completely resolved. There is a 15-degree residual posteromedial bow. The child has no functional limitations and normal gait. The parents are asking about treatment options. How would you counsel them?"
MCQ Practice Points
Natural History Question
Q: What percentage of posteromedial bow of tibia cases resolve spontaneously? A: 90-95% - posteromedial bow is a benign, self-resolving condition. Most cases resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years with normal growth and weight-bearing. Only 5-10% have mild persistent deformity, which is usually acceptable.
Differentiation Question
Q: What is the key difference between posteromedial bow and anterior bow (congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia)? A: Posteromedial bow is benign and self-resolving, while anterior bow is pathological and requires treatment. Posteromedial bow has no NF1 association, normal bone structure, and resolves spontaneously. Anterior bow is associated with NF1 (50-90%), has abnormal bone structure, and may progress to fracture requiring bracing and surgery.
Treatment Question
Q: What is the standard treatment for posteromedial bow of tibia? A: Observation with serial monitoring - this is a benign, self-resolving condition that requires no active treatment. Serial clinical and radiographic follow-up documents resolution. Surgery (osteotomy) is rarely indicated, only for severe persistent deformity after growth completion causing functional problems.
Association Question
Q: What foot deformity is commonly associated with posteromedial bow of tibia? A: Calcaneovalgus foot - this is a common association, and both deformities are positional and resolve together with growth. The calcaneovalgus foot is managed the same way as isolated calcaneovalgus (stretching, serial casting if needed).
Surgical Indication Question
Q: When is surgery indicated for posteromedial bow of tibia? A: Rarely, only for severe persistent deformity after growth completion causing functional problems - surgery is the exception, not the rule. Most cases resolve without treatment. If surgery is needed, tibial osteotomy can correct the deformity, but this is rarely necessary.
Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations
Healthcare System:
- Posteromedial bow management typically involves pediatric orthopedic centers
- Public hospital system provides comprehensive care
- Usually managed in outpatient setting
- Private options available for follow-up
Multidisciplinary Care:
- Pediatric orthopedic surgeon (primary)
- Physiotherapist (if calcaneovalgus needs stretching)
- Radiologist (for serial imaging)
- General practitioner (for routine follow-up)
Medicolegal Considerations:
- Informed consent: Explain benign nature and expected resolution
- Documentation: Document differentiation from anterior bow (CPT)
- Follow-up: Ensure appropriate monitoring until resolution
- Family counseling: Reassure about benign nature and good prognosis
Research and Outcomes:
- Australian centers follow international guidelines
- Registry data helps track outcomes
- Quality of life studies confirm excellent outcomes
POSTEROMEDIAL BOW OF TIBIA
High-Yield Exam Summary
Key Facts
- •Benign congenital deformity - self-resolving
- •90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
- •Associated with calcaneovalgus foot (common)
- •No NF1 association (unlike anterior bow/CPT)
Key Distinctions from CPT
- •Direction: Posteromedial (benign) vs Anterior (pathological)
- •Bone structure: Normal (posteromedial) vs Abnormal (anterior/CPT)
- •NF1: No association (posteromedial) vs 50-90% (anterior/CPT)
- •Treatment: Observation (posteromedial) vs Bracing/surgery (anterior/CPT)
Treatment Algorithm
- •All cases: Observation with serial monitoring
- •Associated calcaneovalgus: Stretching, serial casting if needed
- •Surgery: Rarely indicated, only for severe persistent deformity after growth
- •Key: Differentiate from anterior bow (CPT) - critical distinction
Natural History
- •90-95% resolve spontaneously by age 2-3 years
- •5-10% have mild persistent deformity (usually acceptable)
- •No functional limitations in most cases
- •Excellent prognosis overall
Complications
- •Rare - benign condition with minimal risks
- •Persistent mild deformity: 5-10% (usually acceptable)
- •Mild leg length discrepancy: Rare, usually under 1cm
- •Surgical complications: Rare (surgery rarely needed)