SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURES (ADULT)
Extraarticular Metaphyseal Fracture | Extension vs Flexion Type | High Stiffness Rate
AO/OTA 13-A CLASSIFICATION
Critical Must-Knows
- Extraarticular by definition - articular involvement = intercondylar fracture
- Extension type (95%) - distal fragment displaces posteriorly
- Flexion type (5%) - distal fragment displaces anteriorly
- Adults differ from children - osteoporotic bone, stiffness is major issue
- Dual column fixation preferred even for extraarticular fractures
Examiner's Pearls
- "Draw the distinction from pediatric supracondylar fractures clearly
- "Examiners expect discussion of extension vs flexion type
- "Know the surgical approaches - posterior vs lateral vs medial
- "Discuss stiffness prophylaxis and early ROM protocols
Clinical Imaging
Imaging Gallery

Exam Warning
Adult supracondylar fractures are EXTRAARTICULAR by definition. If there is articular involvement, it is an intercondylar fracture (AO 13-C). Examiners will test this distinction. Extension type (95%) has posterior displacement of the distal fragment - do not confuse with the mechanism!
At a Glance
Adult supracondylar humerus fractures are extraarticular metaphyseal fractures representing 10% of distal humerus fractures. Unlike pediatric supracondylar fractures (which occur in 5-7 year olds via FOOSH), adult fractures occur in osteoporotic bone (peak 50-60 years) via axial loading. Extension type (95%) shows posterior displacement of the distal fragment. The major concern is stiffness (up to 50% functional ROM loss), not deformity as in children. Treatment requires dual column plating for stable fixation allowing early ROM. Know the AO 13-A classification: A1 (simple), A2 (wedge), A3 (complex metaphyseal). Articular involvement reclassifies as intercondylar fracture (13-C).
Adult vs Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures
| Feature | Adult | Pediatric |
|---|
Mnemonics
EXTENDExtension Type Features
Memory Hook:EXTEND reminds you of the mechanism and that this is the common (95%) type with posterior displacement
STIFFComplications in Adult Supracondylar Fractures
Memory Hook:Adult elbows get STIFF - this is the main concern, not deformity like in children
PLATESDual Plating Principles
Memory Hook:PLATES reminds you of the dual plating technique for stable fixation allowing early ROM
Overview and Epidemiology
Adult supracondylar humerus fractures are extraarticular fractures occurring in the metaphyseal region of the distal humerus, proximal to the condyles. They represent approximately 10% of all distal humerus fractures in adults.
Key Distinguishing Features
- Extraarticular by definition - any articular involvement classifies as intercondylar (13-C)
- Metaphyseal location - between the supracondylar ridges and olecranon fossa
- Different from pediatric - mechanism, bone quality, and outcomes differ significantly
Epidemiology
| Factor | Adult Pattern | Pediatric Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Age | 50-60 years (osteoporotic) | 5-7 years |
| Gender | Female predominant (2:1) | Male predominant |
| Mechanism | Axial load, direct trauma | FOOSH hyperextension |
| Associated Injuries | Wrist fractures, other fragility | Isolated injury typical |
Bimodal Distribution
- Young adults (20-40): High-energy trauma (MVA, falls from height)
- Elderly (50+): Low-energy falls on osteoporotic bone
Anatomy and Biomechanics
Dual Column Concept
The distal humerus consists of two columns forming a triangular architecture:
Medial Column
- Extends from supracondylar ridge to medial epicondyle
- Contains the trochlea (articulates with ulna)
- Common flexor origin attachment
- Ulnar nerve courses posteriorly
Lateral Column
- Extends from supracondylar ridge to lateral epicondyle
- Contains the capitellum (articulates with radius)
- Common extensor origin attachment
- More robust than medial column
Supracondylar Region
The supracondylar area is the weakest point due to transition from cylindrical diaphysis to flat metaphysis, thin cortical bone bridging the columns, olecranon and coronoid fossae creating stress risers, and the supracondylar ridges which mark the proximal extent.
Classification Systems
Adult supracondylar fractures are classified under AO/OTA 13-A (extraarticular distal humerus).
Type 13-A1: Simple Extraarticular
Single fracture line with transverse or short oblique pattern. Subtypes include A1.1 (apophyseal avulsion), A1.2 (simple metaphyseal), and A1.3 (simple metaphyseal with instability).
Type 13-A2: Metaphyseal Wedge
Wedge fragment in metaphysis with more comminution than A1. Subtypes include A2.1 (intact wedge), A2.2 (fragmented wedge), and A2.3 (fragmented wedge with instability).
Type 13-A3: Complex Metaphyseal
Significant comminution with no simple fracture pattern. Subtypes include A3.1 (spiroid pattern), A3.2 (irregular pattern), and A3.3 (irregular with bone loss).
History
Mechanism of Injury
High-Energy (Young Adults)
- Motor vehicle accidents
- Falls from height
- Sports injuries
- Industrial accidents
Low-Energy (Elderly)
- Simple falls from standing
- Osteoporotic fractures
- Minimal trauma in fragility bones
Key History Points
| Question | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Hand dominance | Functional importance |
| Occupation | Manual labor vs sedentary |
| Pre-injury function | Baseline ROM, arthritis |
| Previous elbow surgery | May affect approach |
| Medical comorbidities | Surgical fitness, bone quality |
| Anticoagulation | Bleeding risk, hematoma |
| Smoking status | Wound healing, union |
A thorough history guides surgical planning and informs prognosis.
Examination
Inspection
- Swelling: Significant periarticular swelling
- Deformity: S-shaped (extension) or reverse S-shaped (flexion)
- Skin: Open wounds, tenting, blisters
- Ecchymosis: Anterior (extension), posterior (flexion)
Palpation
- Assess column integrity
- Point tenderness over fracture site
- Crepitus with gentle movement
- Triangle of Hueter: Normal in supracondylar (extraarticular)
Range of Motion
- Do not force examination in acute setting
- Document pre-injury ROM if possible
- Assess elbow and forearm rotation
Special Tests
| Test | Assessing | Normal Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Triangle of Hueter | Articular alignment | Equilateral triangle (preserved in supracondylar) |
| Forearm rotation | DRUJ/PRUJ | Full pronation/supination |
| Elbow stability | Ligaments | Not testable acutely |
Examination must be systematic and documented.
Investigations
Standard Views
AP View
- Assess column integrity
- Measure fracture angle
- Evaluate medial/lateral displacement
- Look for articular involvement (would classify as intercondylar)
Lateral View
- Confirm extraarticular nature
- Extension type: Posterior displacement of distal fragment
- Flexion type: Anterior displacement of distal fragment
- S-shaped deformity (extension type)
- Assess coronoid and olecranon fossa involvement
Radiographic Signs
| Finding | Indicates |
|---|---|
| Posterior displacement | Extension type (95%) |
| Anterior displacement | Flexion type (5%) |
| S-shaped deformity (lateral) | Extension type |
| Fat pad sign | Hemarthrosis (may have less effusion if capsule torn) |
| Intact columns | Good prognosis |
| Column comminution | More challenging fixation |
Full-Length Humerus
Full-length humerus views are required for plate length planning, to exclude proximal extension, and to evaluate for pathologic fracture.
Management Algorithm
Non-Operative Indications
Non-operative management is appropriate for minimally displaced fractures (under 5mm), stable patterns on stress views, non-ambulatory patients with minimal functional demands, and patients with medical comorbidities precluding surgery or patient preference after informed consent.
Operative Indications (Most Cases)
Surgery is indicated for displacement over 5mm, any angulation, unstable patterns, polytrauma requiring mobilization, open fractures, and cases with vascular injury requiring repair.
Surgical Technique
Posterior Approach (Most Common)
Indications
- Complex fracture patterns
- Need for dual column access
- Olecranon osteotomy planned
Technique
- Position: Lateral decubitus or prone
- Midline posterior incision
- Full-thickness flaps
- Identify and protect ulnar nerve
- Access columns via:
- Triceps-splitting
- Triceps-reflecting (Bryan-Morrey)
- Olecranon osteotomy
Advantages
- Excellent exposure
- Allows dual plating
- Can extend proximally/distally
Disadvantages
- Extensile dissection
- Triceps dysfunction risk
- Higher stiffness rates
Lateral Approach (Kocher)
Indications
- Simple lateral column fractures
- Less comminuted patterns
Technique
- Lateral skin incision
- Interval: anconeus and ECU
- Protect radial nerve
- Access lateral column
Medial Approach
Indications
- Isolated medial column fractures
- Ulnar nerve exploration needed
Technique
The medial approach involves a medial skin incision, identification of the ulnar nerve first, protection or transposition of the nerve, then access to the medial column.
Complications
Neurovascular Injury
Ulnar Nerve (Most Common)
- Incidence: 15-20% (neuropraxia)
- Causes: Initial injury, surgical manipulation, hardware
- Management: Observation 3 months, then exploration if no recovery
Radial Nerve
- Incidence: 5-10%
- Causes: Proximal fracture extension, lateral approach
- Management: As above
Vascular Injury
- Less common than pediatric
- Brachial artery at risk anteriorly
- May require vascular repair
Infection
| Type | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Superficial | 2-5% | Antibiotics, wound care |
| Deep | 1-3% | Debridement, IV antibiotics |
| Chronic osteomyelitis | Rare | Staged reconstruction |
Wound Complications
Wound issues include skin necrosis (especially with posterior approach), dehiscence, and hematoma. Risk is higher with diabetes, smoking, and anticoagulation.
Postoperative Care
Rehabilitation Protocol
Phase 1: Protection (Week 0-2)
| Goal | Activity |
|---|---|
| Pain control | Multimodal analgesia |
| Wound healing | Dressings, monitor for infection |
| Edema control | Elevation, compression |
| Begin ROM | Passive and active-assisted as pain allows |
| Avoid | Valgus stress, loaded extension |
Phase 2: Early Motion (Week 2-6)
| Goal | Activity |
|---|---|
| ROM progression | Active ROM full arc |
| Forearm rotation | Full pronation/supination |
| Gentle strengthening | Isometrics only |
| Targets | 0-130° flexion/extension arc |
| Splinting | Night extension splint if stiffness |
Phase 3: Strengthening (Week 6-12)
| Goal | Activity |
|---|---|
| Progressive strengthening | Resistance exercises |
| Functional activities | ADLs, light work |
| Continue ROM | Maintain gains |
| Targets | 75% strength of contralateral |
Phase 4: Return to Activity (3-6 months)
| Goal | Activity |
|---|---|
| Full strengthening | Sport-specific or occupational |
| Impact activities | Gradual return |
| Monitoring | Ensure no stiffness regression |
Follow-up Schedule
Postoperative Visits
| Timepoint | Assessment |
|---|---|
| 2 weeks | Wound check, remove sutures, begin ROM |
| 6 weeks | X-ray, ROM assessment |
| 3 months | X-ray, functional assessment |
| 6 months | Final ROM, strength testing |
| 12 months | Discharge if stable |
Imaging Protocol
- 6 weeks: AP and lateral - callus formation
- 3 months: Confirm union progression
- 6 months: Final union confirmation
- PRN: If concern for nonunion or hardware failure
Outcomes and Prognosis
Functional Outcomes
Expected ROM
| Outcome | ORIF | TEA |
|---|---|---|
| Flexion arc | 100-130° | 90-130° |
| Extension loss | 10-30° | 20-30° |
| Pronation | Near full | Near full |
| Supination | Near full | Near full |
Functional Scoring
| Score | Good Outcome Threshold |
|---|---|
| MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance) | Over 80 points |
| DASH | Under 20 points |
| Grip strength | Over 75% contralateral |
Outcome Predictors
Favorable
- Young age
- Simple fracture pattern
- Good bone quality
- Early ROM initiation
- Compliant patient
Unfavorable
- Elderly
- Comminution
- Osteoporosis
- Delayed treatment
- Smoking
- Diabetes
Return to Activities
| Activity | Expected Return |
|---|---|
| Desk work | 2-4 weeks |
| Driving | 6-8 weeks |
| Light manual work | 3-4 months |
| Heavy manual work | 6+ months |
| Contact sports | 6-12 months |
Long-term Considerations
- Post-traumatic arthritis: 10-20% develop symptomatic arthritis
- Stiffness: Most common permanent sequela
- Hardware removal: May be needed in 10-20%
- Secondary TEA: Salvage for failed ORIF or severe stiffness
Evidence Base
Dual Plating vs Single Plate
- Dual plating provides superior biomechanical stability
- Allows earlier mobilization without loss of fixation
- Single plate fixation associated with higher failure rates
- Perpendicular and parallel configurations equivalent
Perpendicular vs Parallel Plating
- Perpendicular plating: Superior torsional stability
- Parallel plating: Better axial stiffness
- No significant clinical difference in outcomes
- Both configurations acceptable
TEA vs ORIF for Elderly
- RCT comparing ORIF vs TEA in patients over 65
- TEA: Better early function (DASH scores)
- ORIF: More complications, reoperations
- TEA: Lifelong activity restrictions (5kg limit)
Olecranon Osteotomy Outcomes
- Chevron osteotomy: 5-10% nonunion rate
- Pre-drilling reduces nonunion risk
- Hardware prominence requiring removal: 20%
- Does not compromise function if heals
Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis
- Indomethacin 75mg daily for 6 weeks reduces HO
- Single-dose radiation (700cGy) equally effective
- High-risk patients benefit most (head injury, burns)
- Routine prophylaxis debated in standard cases
Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Scenario 1: Low-Energy Fracture in 55F
"A 55-year-old woman presents with a low-energy supracondylar humerus fracture. X-rays show posterior displacement. How would you manage this?"
Initial Assessment:
- Confirm extraarticular pattern (supracondylar not intercondylar)
- Full neurovascular examination - especially ulnar nerve
- CT scan for surgical planning and to confirm no articular involvement
- Assess bone quality - likely osteoporotic at this age
Treatment Plan:
- Operative management indicated - displaced fracture
- Dual column plating via posterior approach
- Locking plates given likely osteoporosis
- Consider cement augmentation if severely osteoporotic
Key Principles:
- Stable fixation to enable early ROM (prevent stiffness)
- Perpendicular or parallel plating both acceptable
- Minimum 6 cortices proximal fixation per column
Scenario 2: Complex Elderly Fracture
"Describe your approach to a comminuted supracondylar fracture in an 80-year-old with rheumatoid arthritis and severe osteoporosis."
Special Considerations:
- Age and osteoporosis: Poor fixation purchase expected
- Rheumatoid arthritis: May have pre-existing joint destruction
- Comminution: Difficult reconstruction
Treatment Options:
- ORIF with dual locking plates: Longest possible plates, maximum distal screw density, consider cement.
- Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA): Indicated given age, osteoporosis, RA, comminution. Reliable pain relief.
My Recommendation: Primary TEA would be my preference given the combination of factors. Patient counseling regarding activity restrictions (5kg lifetime limit) is essential.
Scenario 3: Post-Op Stiffness
"Six months post-ORIF of a supracondylar fracture, your patient has 30-100° of flexion. How do you manage this stiffness?"
Assessment:
- Current arc: 70° (30-100°) - functionally limiting
- main deficits: Loss of terminal flexion and extension
- Inv: X-rays (union, HO), CT (if HO suspected), Inflammatory markers (infection)
Management at 6 Months:
- Continue conservative: Intensive physiotherapy, static progressive splinting (extension and flexion).
- Surgical options:
- Arthroscopic release (preferred if no HO)
- Open release (if HO or complex)
Timing: If HO present, wait 12-18 months for maturation. If capsular only, can operate earlier.
Scenario 4: Surgical Technique Viva
"You are planning ORIF for an adult supracondylar fracture. Describe your surgical approach and fixation strategy."
Plan: CT 3D recon. Posterior midline incision.
Approach: Identify ulnar nerve FIRST. Triceps-splitting or reflecting approach (e.g. Bryan-Morrey) or Olecranon Osteotomy for max exposure.
Fixation:
- Anatomic reduction of columns
- Dual plating (medial + posterolateral OR parallel)
- Min 6 cortices proximal, max screws distal
- Checking ROM intra-op
Closure: Layered closure, ulnar nerve transposition if indicated/irritated.
MCQ Practice Points
Q1: Extension Type
Q: In an extension-type adult supracondylar fracture, the distal fragment displaces in which direction?
A: Posteriorly (Answer B). Extension type (95% of cases) has posterior displacement of the distal fragment. The mechanism is axial load with elbow extended, causing the distal fragment to angulate posteriorly. Creates classic S-shaped deformity on lateral view.
Q2: Classification
Q: A supracondylar humerus fracture with involvement of the articular surface should be classified as which AO type?
A: AO 13-C (Answer C). By definition, supracondylar fractures are EXTRAARTICULAR (13-A). Any articular involvement makes it an intercondylar fracture (13-C). This distinction is critical as it changes surgical planning and prognosis.
Q3: Fixation
Q: What is the preferred fixation for adult supracondylar humerus fractures?
A: Dual column plating (Answer C). Dual column plating (perpendicular or parallel) is the gold standard. It provides stability for early ROM, which is critical to prevent stiffness - the most common complication. Single plate fixation has higher failure rates.
Q4: Main Complication
Q: What is the most common complication following adult supracondylar humerus fractures?
A: Stiffness (Answer C). Stiffness is the NUMBER ONE complication, with up to 50% of patients losing functional ROM. This is why stable fixation enabling early ROM is the primary treatment goal. Extension loss is most common.
Q5: Nerve at Risk
Q: Which nerve is most commonly injured in extension-type supracondylar fractures?
A: Ulnar Nerve (Answer C). The ulnar nerve is most commonly affected (neurapraxia) due to its proximity to the medial column and potential tethering in the cubital tunnel. Radial nerve injury is also possible with proximal extension or lateral approach.
Q6: Surgical Exposure
Q: Which surgical approach offers the maximal visualization of the articular surface for complex intra-articular fractures?
A: Olecranon Osteotomy (Answer D). While the triceps-splitting/reflecting approaches preserve the extensor mechanism, an olecranon osteotomy provides the most extensile view of the articular surface, essential for restoring congruity in complex comminuted patterns (AO 13-C3).
Australian Context
Adult supracondylar fractures in Australia mirror international patterns with a bimodal distribution: high-energy trauma in young adults and low-energy osteoporotic fractures in elderly patients. The Australian Orthopaedic Association supports dual column plating as standard of care for displaced fractures, with increasing acceptance of primary TEA for elderly patients with comminution and osteoporosis based on Level I evidence.
Local considerations include access to specialized upper limb units for complex reconstructions, physiotherapy resources for early ROM protocols essential to prevent stiffness, and bone health assessment pathways for fragility fractures. Prosthesis availability includes modern locking plate systems and various TEA designs through major orthopaedic suppliers. ANZORS-funded research continues to evaluate ORIF versus TEA outcomes in the Australian population, and ACI guidelines emphasize early mobilization protocols post-fixation.
Adult Supracondylar Fractures
High-Yield Exam Summary
Definition & Classification
- •Extraarticular distal humerus fractures in metaphyseal region
- •AO/OTA 13-A (extraarticular): A1 simple, A2 wedge, A3 complex
- •Any articular extension = Intercondylar (AO 13-C)
- •Extension type (95%) vs Flexion type (5%)
Key Exam Concepts
- •Stiffness is THE major complication (vs deformity in kids)
- •Dual column plating is gold standard fixation
- •Minimum 6 cortices proximal fixation per column
- •Primary TEA valid for elderly, osteoporotic, comminuted
Crucial Management Steps
- •CT Scan standard for surgical planning
- •Identify Ulnar Nerve early in posterior approach
- •Rigid fixation (LOCKING in osteporosis) allows early ROM
- •Pre-drill olecranon osteotomy before cutting
Common Pitfalls
- •Confusing supracondylar (extraarticular) with intercondylar
- •Using single plate fixation (high failure rate)
- •Delaying ROM leads to Stiffness (50% incidence)
- •Missing ulnar nerve palsy or vascular injury