Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Tendon Healing

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Tendon Healing

Biology of tendon healing including phases, intrinsic vs extrinsic mechanisms, collagen synthesis, growth factors, and factors affecting healing outcomes

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

TENDON HEALING

Three Phases | Intrinsic vs Extrinsic | Type III to Type I Transition | Growth Factor Regulation

3 phasesinflammatory, proliferative, remodeling
6-8 weeksproliferative phase duration
6-12 monthsremodeling phase duration
60-80%final strength vs normal tendon

Three Phases of Tendon Healing

Inflammatory
Pattern0-7 days
TreatmentHematoma, inflammation, weak
Proliferative
Pattern7 days - 6 weeks
TreatmentTenocyte proliferation, collagen III
Remodeling
Pattern6 weeks - 12+ months
TreatmentCollagen I, fiber alignment, strength

Critical Must-Knows

  • Three overlapping phases: inflammatory (0-7 days), proliferative (7 days-6 weeks), remodeling (6 weeks-12+ months)
  • Intrinsic healing via tenocytes (preferred) vs extrinsic healing via peritendinous fibroblasts (adhesions)
  • Collagen type III appears first (disorganized scar), gradually replaced by type I (aligned, strong)
  • Growth factors regulate healing: TGF-β (scar formation), VEGF (angiogenesis), IGF-1 and PDGF (proliferation)
  • Early controlled motion superior to immobilization - reduces adhesions, promotes intrinsic healing, improves fiber alignment

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Zone-specific healing in hand flexor tendons: Zone 2 worst prognosis (poor vascularity, synovial sheath)
  • "
    Adhesion formation main complication - balance between healing and motion
  • "
    Gap healing (under 3mm) better outcomes than proliferative healing (larger gaps)
  • "
    Repair quality more important than timing (primary vs delayed) for outcomes

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

EP4 Antagonism Increased Early Granulation and Matrix Deposition around the Repair.Histologic analysis demonstrated increased granulation (outlined in yellow) and matrix deposition around the repair s
Click to expand
EP4 Antagonism Increased Early Granulation and Matrix Deposition around the Repair.Histologic analysis demonstrated increased granulation (outlined inCredit: Geary MB et al. via PLoS ONE via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Changes in Collagen Organization by Polarized Light Microscopy.Picrosirius red staining was used to visualize changes in collagen organization over time in vehicle and EP4 antagonist treated repairs.
Click to expand
Changes in Collagen Organization by Polarized Light Microscopy.Picrosirius red staining was used to visualize changes in collagen organization over tiCredit: Geary MB et al. via PLoS ONE via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Tendon Healing Exam Points

Three Overlapping Phases

Inflammatory (0-7 days): Hematoma, inflammatory cells, weak fibrin clot. Proliferative (7 days-6 weeks): Tenocyte proliferation, collagen III synthesis, neovascularization. Remodeling (6 weeks-12+ months): Collagen I replaces III, fiber realignment, strength increase.

Intrinsic vs Extrinsic

Intrinsic: Tenocytes and epitenon cells proliferate, synthesize matrix. Results in functional tendon with less adhesions. Extrinsic: Peritendinous fibroblasts invade, form scar tissue. Results in adhesions but provides early mechanical strength.

Collagen Transition

Type III collagen (thin, disorganized) appears first at 1-2 weeks, peaks at 2-3 weeks. Gradually replaced by Type I collagen (thick, organized) from 6 weeks onward. Type I alignment along stress lines improves tensile strength. Never reaches 100% of normal.

Growth Factor Regulation

TGF-β: Promotes fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis (can cause excessive scarring). VEGF: Angiogenesis (essential early, problematic late). IGF-1 and PDGF: Stimulate tenocyte proliferation. FGF: Matrix synthesis and remodeling.

Mnemonic

IPRThree Phases of Tendon Healing

I
Inflammatory phase
0-7 days: hematoma, inflammation, fibrin clot, weak
P
Proliferative phase
7 days-6 weeks: tenocyte proliferation, collagen III, neovascularization
R
Remodeling phase
6 weeks-12+ months: collagen I synthesis, fiber alignment, strength restoration

Memory Hook:IPR - I'm Promoting Recovery through three phases!

Mnemonic

TV PIG-FGrowth Factors in Tendon Healing

T
TGF-β
Transforming growth factor - promotes fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis
V
VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor - angiogenesis
P
PDGF
Platelet-derived growth factor - cell proliferation
I
IGF-1
Insulin-like growth factor - tenocyte proliferation and collagen synthesis
G
bFGF
basic Fibroblast growth factor - matrix synthesis and remodeling

Memory Hook:Watch TV with a PIG for healing - growth factors drive tendon repair!

Mnemonic

VZMQBLFactors Affecting Tendon Healing

V
Vascularity
Better blood supply = better healing (Zone 1 better than Zone 2)
Z
Zone of injury
Zone 2 flexor tendons worst (avascular, synovial sheath)
M
Motion protocol
Early controlled motion superior to immobilization
Q
Quality of repair
Strong repair allows early motion, better outcomes
B
Biological factors
Age, diabetes, smoking, NSAIDs impair healing
L
Load and stress
Appropriate mechanical loading stimulates healing and alignment

Memory Hook:VZMQBL - Very Zealous Motion Quite Beneficial for Living tendons!

Overview and Healing Phases

Tendon healing is a complex biological process involving sequential and overlapping phases of inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Unlike bone, which heals through regeneration of native tissue, tendon healing occurs through scar tissue formation that never fully restores the original structure and biomechanical properties of healthy tendon.

The healing process involves a delicate balance between intrinsic healing (via tenocytes within the tendon) and extrinsic healing (via peritendinous fibroblasts). Intrinsic healing produces functional tendon with minimal adhesions, while extrinsic healing provides early mechanical strength but at the cost of adhesion formation.

Why Tendon Healing Matters Clinically

Understanding tendon healing biology explains: why early controlled motion protocols are superior to immobilization; why Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries have poor prognosis; why adhesions form despite modern surgical techniques; why repair strength at 6 weeks allows protected motion but re-rupture risk remains; why biological augmentation strategies (PRP, growth factors) are being investigated.

Concepts and Mechanisms

Fundamental Tendon Healing Biology

Tendon healing represents a fundamental biological process that differs significantly from bone healing. While bone heals through regeneration, restoring native tissue architecture, tendon healing occurs through scar tissue formation that never fully replicates the original structure or mechanical properties.

Key Differences from Bone Healing:

  • Bone regenerates native tissue; tendon forms scar
  • Bone healing restores 100% strength; tendon plateaus at 60-80%
  • Bone healing reconstitutes normal architecture; tendon remains disorganized
  • Bone healing follows predictable timeline; tendon healing highly variable

Critical Healing Balance:

  • Too little inflammation: Delayed healing, poor strength
  • Too much inflammation: Excessive scarring, adhesions
  • Too little motion: Adhesions, weak disorganized healing
  • Too much motion: Gap formation, rupture

Phases of Tendon Healing

Inflammatory Phase (0-7 Days)

Inflammatory Phase Events

0-24 hoursImmediate Response

Hematoma formation at injury site. Platelets aggregate and release growth factors (PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF) from alpha granules. Fibrin clot provides initial weak scaffold. Vasoactive mediators cause vasodilation and increased vascular permeability.

24-72 hoursCellular Infiltration

Neutrophils infiltrate (peak at 24 hours) for phagocytosis of debris and bacteria. Monocytes arrive and differentiate into macrophages (M1 phenotype initially). Inflammatory cells release cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α).

3-7 daysTransition to Proliferation

Macrophage phenotype shift from M1 (pro-inflammatory) to M2 (pro-healing). M2 macrophages release growth factors promoting angiogenesis and fibroblast recruitment. Neovascularization begins with VEGF stimulation of endothelial cells.

Key Cellular Players:

  • Platelets: Release growth factors from alpha granules
  • Neutrophils: Phagocytosis, debris removal (peak 24h, gone by 3-5 days)
  • Macrophages: M1 to M2 transition, orchestrate healing response
  • Endothelial cells: Begin angiogenesis in response to VEGF

Biomechanical Properties:

  • Tensile strength: 0-10% of normal
  • Fibrin clot provides weak mechanical continuity
  • High risk of gapping or re-rupture with loading
  • Requires immobilization or protected mobilization

Clinical Implication

First week after repair: Tendon has minimal strength - relies on suture integrity. Avoid active loading. Early passive motion can begin if repair is strong enough (minimum 4-strand core suture).

Understanding the inflammatory phase explains why NSAIDs should be used cautiously (may impair healing), why diabetes impairs healing (altered macrophage function), and why early infection is devastating (overwhelms nascent healing response).

Proliferative Phase (7 Days to 6 Weeks)

Proliferative Phase Events

Week 1-2Tenocyte Activation

Intrinsic tenocytes proliferate in response to growth factors (IGF-1, PDGF, TGF-β). Peritendinous fibroblasts migrate into healing site (extrinsic healing). Cell density peaks at 2 weeks (3-5x normal).

Week 2-4Matrix Synthesis

Collagen type III synthesis begins (thin fibrils, 10-14 nm diameter). Disorganized matrix fills the gap. Glycosaminoglycans (dermatan sulfate, hyaluronan) deposited. Fibronectin provides scaffold for cell migration.

Week 1-6Neovascularization

Peak vascularity at 3-4 weeks. VEGF-driven angiogenesis from surrounding tissue. Increased metabolic activity supports collagen synthesis. Vascularity begins to regress after 6 weeks.

Week 4-6Early Organization

Collagen fibers begin aligning along lines of stress if appropriate mechanical loading applied. Cell density starts decreasing. Transition to remodeling phase begins.

Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Healing:

FeatureIntrinsic HealingExtrinsic Healing
Cell SourceTenocytes, epitenon cells within tendonPeritendinous fibroblasts, inflammatory cells
Collagen QualityMore organized, Type I predominates earlierDisorganized, Type III predominates longer
AdhesionsMinimal - smooth gliding surface maintainedSevere - peritendinous scar binds tendon
StrengthSlower gain initially, stronger ultimatelyFaster gain initially, weaker ultimately
Clinical GoalPromote with early controlled motionMinimize by preventing extrinsic cell invasion

Key Growth Factors:

  • TGF-β1: Most abundant, promotes fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis (can cause excessive scarring)
  • PDGF: Chemotactic for fibroblasts, stimulates proliferation
  • IGF-1: Promotes tenocyte proliferation and collagen synthesis
  • VEGF: Drives angiogenesis, peaks at 1-2 weeks
  • bFGF: Stimulates angiogenesis and matrix synthesis

Biomechanical Properties:

  • Tensile strength: 10-30% of normal by 6 weeks
  • Collagen III provides some mechanical integrity but is inferior to Type I
  • Disorganized fiber arrangement limits load-bearing capacity
  • Gradual increase in strength allows progressive loading

Early Controlled Motion Rationale

Early controlled motion during proliferative phase: (1) Promotes intrinsic over extrinsic healing (less adhesions), (2) Aligns collagen fibers along stress lines (better tensile properties), (3) Prevents joint stiffness and muscle atrophy, (4) Improves collagen cross-linking and fiber organization. Must balance motion benefits against re-rupture risk - requires strong repair (4-strand minimum).

Understanding the proliferative phase explains why the 2-6 week period is critical for determining final outcome, why early motion improves results, and why growth factor augmentation strategies target this phase.

Remodeling Phase (6 Weeks to 12+ Months)

Remodeling Phase Events

6 weeks - 3 monthsCollagen Maturation

Type I collagen synthesis increases, replacing Type III. Type I:III ratio shifts from 1:3 at 6 weeks to 2:1 at 3 months (normal is 19:1). Collagen cross-linking via lysyl oxidase creates pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline bonds for tensile strength.

3-6 monthsFiber Alignment

Collagen fibers align along longitudinal axis in response to mechanical loading. Crimp pattern (waviness) begins to appear. Cell density decreases toward normal (but remains slightly elevated). Vascularity decreases toward normal avascular state.

6-12 monthsTissue Remodeling

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade disorganized collagen. New aligned collagen is deposited. Gradual strength gain to 60-80% of normal. Adhesions mature - can improve with therapy but difficult to eliminate completely.

12+ monthsMaturation

Steady state reached - remodeling slows but continues for years. Final strength 60-80% of native tendon (never 100%). Scar tissue remains - never fully regenerates native tendon structure. Residual increased vascularity and cellularity compared to normal.

Collagen Type Transition:

Time PointType I CollagenType III CollagenType I:III RatioTensile Strength
Normal Tendon95%5%19:1100%
2 Weeks25%75%1:315%
6 Weeks40%60%2:330%
3 Months67%33%2:150%
12+ Months75%25%3:160-80%

Key Remodeling Processes:

  • Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs): MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-13 degrade collagen for remodeling
  • Tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs): Regulate MMP activity to prevent excessive degradation
  • Mechanical loading: Essential for fiber alignment and cross-linking
  • Apoptosis: Excess cells undergo programmed death, normalizing cell density

Biomechanical Properties:

  • Tensile strength: 30% at 6 weeks to 50% at 3 months to 60-80% at 12+ months
  • Stiffness: Gradually increases as Type I collagen predominates
  • Elasticity: Improved with fiber alignment but never reaches normal
  • Crimp pattern: Partially restored but less regular than native

Clinical Implication

Healed tendon is permanently weaker than native tendon (60-80% strength). Athletes returning to sport have ongoing re-rupture risk. Counseling patients on residual weakness and risk of re-injury is essential.

Understanding the remodeling phase explains why return to full activity requires 4-6 months minimum, why strength plateaus at 60-80% (never 100%), and why adhesiolysis surgery should be delayed until at least 3 months (allow collagen maturation).

Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Healing

Two Mechanisms of Tendon Healing

Tendon healing involves contributions from both intrinsic (within-tendon) and extrinsic (peritendinous) mechanisms. The balance between these two determines functional outcome.

Intrinsic Healing:

  • Cell source: Tenocytes within tendon substance and epitenon surface cells
  • Mechanism: Tenocytes proliferate and synthesize matrix directly at injury site
  • Advantages: Produces organized collagen aligned with tendon axis, minimal adhesions, preserves gliding function
  • Disadvantages: Slower initial healing, requires intact vascular supply, vulnerable to complete rupture
  • Clinical goal: Promote with early controlled motion and strong surgical repair

Extrinsic Healing:

  • Cell source: Fibroblasts from peritendinous tissue (paratenon, synovial sheath, surrounding fascia)
  • Mechanism: Inflammatory response recruits fibroblasts that invade healing site and deposit scar matrix
  • Advantages: Rapid mechanical strength, occurs even with complete tendon disruption
  • Disadvantages: Disorganized collagen, adhesions bind tendon to surrounding structures, loss of gliding function
  • Clinical problem: Adhesions are the main complication of flexor tendon repair
Outcome MeasureIntrinsic-Dominant HealingExtrinsic-Dominant Healing
Adhesion FormationMinimal - smooth gliding maintainedSevere - tendon bound to sheath or surrounding tissue
Collagen OrganizationAligned along tendon axisDisorganized, multidirectional
Tensile Strength (final)Higher (70-80% of normal)Lower (50-60% of normal)
Range of MotionExcellent - near normal glidingPoor - restricted by adhesions
Clinical StrategyEarly controlled motion promotes intrinsicImmobilization promotes extrinsic (avoid)

Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Healing

Zone 2 (no man's land) has worst prognosis because: (1) Poor intrinsic healing potential (avascular), (2) Enclosed synovial sheath promotes extrinsic healing and adhesions, (3) Long finger flexion excursion (8-9cm) requires extensive gliding, (4) Critical balance between early motion (prevent adhesions) and protection (prevent rupture). Requires 4-strand core suture minimum for early motion protocols.

Clinical Relevance

Clinical Applications and Implications

Understanding tendon healing biology directly informs clinical decision-making and patient management across multiple scenarios.

Flexor Tendon Repair:

  • Zone 2 requires 4-strand core suture minimum for early motion
  • Duran, Kleinert, Indiana, Mayo protocols all based on healing biology
  • Early motion (weeks 0-6) prevents adhesions during proliferative phase
  • Protected loading until 6 weeks when remodeling begins

Achilles Tendon Repair:

  • Immobilization in equinus for inflammatory phase (0-2 weeks)
  • Controlled dorsiflexion starting at 2 weeks (proliferative phase)
  • Progressive loading from 6 weeks (remodeling phase)
  • Full weight-bearing by 8-12 weeks
  • Return to sport at 6-9 months (60-80% strength restoration)

Rotator Cuff Repair:

  • Strong initial fixation allows early passive motion
  • Avoid active loading during inflammatory phase (0-6 weeks)
  • Progressive strengthening during remodeling (6+ weeks)
  • Biological augmentation (PRP, patches) targets proliferative phase
  • Re-tear risk highest in first 3 months (weak collagen III phase)

Patient Counseling:

  • Healing never restores 100% of normal strength
  • Re-rupture risk persists lifelong (60-80% final strength)
  • Smoking cessation essential (impairs all phases)
  • Diabetes control critical (affects macrophages, collagen synthesis)
  • Early compliance with rehabilitation determines final outcome

Molecular Biology and Growth Factors

Growth Factors Regulating Tendon Healing

Growth factors released from platelets, inflammatory cells, and healing tissue cells orchestrate the healing process. Understanding their roles explains therapeutic targets and potential augmentation strategies.

Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-β):

  • Most abundant growth factor in tendon healing
  • Three isoforms: TGF-β1 (pro-fibrotic), TGF-β2 (intermediate), TGF-β3 (anti-scarring)
  • Stimulates fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis
  • High levels associated with adhesion formation
  • Potential target: reduce TGF-β1 or supplement TGF-β3 to minimize scarring

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF):

  • Master regulator of angiogenesis
  • Peaks at 1-2 weeks, essential for delivering nutrients and cells
  • Biphasic role: beneficial early (healing), detrimental late (chronic tendinopathy)
  • Anti-VEGF therapies investigated for chronic tendinopathy

Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1):

  • Promotes tenocyte proliferation and Type I collagen synthesis
  • Enhances matrix protein production
  • Anti-apoptotic (supports cell survival)
  • Component of growth hormone-stimulated healing

Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF):

  • Released from platelet alpha granules
  • Chemotactic for fibroblasts and inflammatory cells
  • Stimulates cell proliferation
  • Component of PRP preparations

Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF):

  • Stimulates fibroblast proliferation and angiogenesis
  • Enhances collagen synthesis
  • Improves tensile strength in animal models
  • Investigated as therapeutic agent

Factors Affecting Healing

Clinical and Biological Factors Influencing Outcome

Vascular Supply:

  • Better blood supply correlates with better healing
  • Zone 2 flexor tendons (avascular) heal poorly
  • Achilles watershed zone (2-6cm proximal to insertion) ruptures frequently
  • Compromised vascularity slows all phases of healing

Zone-Specific Considerations (Flexor Tendons):

  • Zone 1: Good vascularity, favorable outcomes
  • Zone 2: Poor vascularity, enclosed sheath, worst outcomes
  • Zone 3-5: Excellent vascularity, favorable outcomes
  • Rehabilitation protocols must be zone-specific

Motion vs Immobilization:

  • Early controlled motion: Promotes intrinsic healing, aligns fibers, reduces adhesions, improves final strength
  • Immobilization: Promotes extrinsic healing, adhesions, disorganized collagen, weaker outcome
  • Optimal window: Enough motion to stimulate healing, not so much to cause gapping

Repair Quality:

  • Gap healing (less than 3mm) produces organized tendon with minimal adhesions
  • Proliferative healing (greater than 3mm gap) requires extensive granulation tissue and adhesions
  • Strong repair (4-strand core suture, 40-60N) allows early motion
  • Weak repair (2-strand, 20-30N) requires longer immobilization

Age:

  • Children and adolescents: Faster healing, better intrinsic response, lower adhesion rates
  • Older adults: Slower healing, reduced cellularity, higher adhesion rates
  • Healing time increases approximately 10% per decade after age 30

Diabetes:

  • Impaired macrophage function (delayed M1 to M2 transition)
  • Reduced tenocyte proliferation and collagen synthesis
  • Impaired cross-linking (advanced glycation end products)
  • Higher re-rupture rates (2-3x for Achilles)

Smoking:

  • Vasoconstriction reduces blood flow
  • Tissue hypoxia from carbon monoxide
  • Reduced fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis
  • Cessation 4+ weeks pre-op reduces complications

Medications:

  • NSAIDs: May impair early inflammatory phase (evidence mixed)
  • Corticosteroids: Inhibit collagen synthesis, delay healing
  • Quinolone antibiotics: Associated with tendon ruptures

Evidence Base

Three Phases of Tendon Healing Characterized

4
Sharma P, Maffulli N • J Bone Joint Surg Am (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Inflammatory phase (0-7 days): Hematoma, inflammatory cells, fibrin clot, minimal strength
  • Proliferative phase (7 days-6 weeks): Tenocyte proliferation, Type III collagen synthesis, neovascularization, strength to 30%
  • Remodeling phase (6 weeks-12+ months): Type I collagen replaces III, fiber alignment, strength to 60-80%
  • Healing never fully restores native tendon structure or biomechanical properties
Clinical Implication: Understanding phases guides rehabilitation timing - immobilization in inflammatory phase, early controlled motion in proliferative phase, progressive loading in remodeling phase. Final strength 60-80% explains ongoing re-rupture risk.
Limitation: Review article synthesizing prior work; phase durations vary by tendon type and injury severity.

Early Controlled Motion Superior to Immobilization

2
Gelberman RH, et al • J Bone Joint Surg Am (1986)
Key Findings:
  • Canine flexor tendon repair model with early passive motion vs immobilization
  • Early motion group: Better tensile strength, less adhesions, improved excursion
  • Motion promoted intrinsic tenocyte-mediated healing over extrinsic fibroblast healing
  • Immobilization resulted in dense adhesions and weak disorganized collagen
Clinical Implication: Established scientific basis for early motion protocols (Duran, Kleinert) that became standard of care. Requires strong enough repair to withstand early loading (4-strand minimum).
Limitation: Animal model; optimal motion protocol (passive vs active, frequency, duration) requires further study.

Growth Factors in Tendon Healing - TGF-β Dual Role

3
Chang J, et al • J Hand Surg Am (2000)
Key Findings:
  • TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 promote collagen synthesis and cell proliferation (healing) but also cause adhesions
  • TGF-β3 reduces adhesion formation in animal models without impairing healing
  • Exogenous TGF-β1 application increased repair strength but worsened adhesions
  • Blocking TGF-β reduced adhesions but also reduced healing strength
Clinical Implication: Explains why simple growth factor supplementation is challenging - TGF-β needed for healing but excess causes scarring. TGF-β3 may offer therapeutic window. Highlights need for balanced approach.
Limitation: Animal studies; TGF-β3 not clinically available; optimal dosing and timing uncertain.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Flexor Tendon Healing Biology

EXAMINER

"Examiner asks: Describe the biology of flexor tendon healing after surgical repair. Why do Zone 2 injuries have poor outcomes?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
Flexor tendon healing occurs through three overlapping phases. First, the inflammatory phase from 0 to 7 days involves hematoma formation, inflammatory cell infiltration - neutrophils peak at 24 hours followed by macrophages which transition from M1 pro-inflammatory to M2 pro-healing phenotype. The repair has minimal strength during this phase, relying on suture integrity. Growth factors are released from platelets including PDGF, TGF-beta, and VEGF. Second, the proliferative phase from 7 days to 6 weeks involves tenocyte proliferation stimulated by growth factors. Cells synthesize Type III collagen which forms a disorganized scar matrix. Neovascularization peaks at 3-4 weeks. The balance between intrinsic healing via tenocytes and extrinsic healing via peritendinous fibroblasts determines outcome - intrinsic produces organized tendon with minimal adhesions while extrinsic produces scar and adhesions but provides early strength. Third, the remodeling phase from 6 weeks to 12 or more months involves Type I collagen gradually replacing Type III, with the Type I to Type III ratio shifting from 1:3 to eventually 2:1, though normal is 19:1. Collagen fibers align along stress lines if appropriate mechanical loading is applied. Matrix metalloproteinases remodel disorganized matrix. Tensile strength increases to 30% at 6 weeks, 50% at 3 months, and plateaus at 60-80% by 12 months - never reaching 100% of native. Zone 2 has poor outcomes because it is relatively avascular, relying on diffusion from synovial fluid via sparse vincular vessels. The enclosed fibrous flexor sheath promotes extrinsic healing and adhesion formation. The tendon must glide 7-8cm through Zone 2 so any adhesion severely restricts motion. This requires aggressive early motion protocols to prevent adhesions, but the avascular zone heals more slowly increasing re-rupture risk. Balancing early motion against repair protection is challenging.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Three phases: inflammatory (0-7d), proliferative (7d-6wk), remodeling (6wk-12+mo)
Type III collagen first (weak, disorganized), replaced by Type I (strong, aligned)
Intrinsic (tenocytes) vs extrinsic (fibroblasts) healing determines adhesions
Final strength 60-80% of normal, never 100%
Zone 2 poor outcome: avascular, enclosed sheath, high excursion demands
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not explaining all three phases in sequence
✗Missing the Type III to Type I collagen transition (critical concept)
✗Forgetting to explain intrinsic vs extrinsic healing (determines adhesions)
✗Not mentioning why Zone 2 is specifically problematic (vascularity, sheath, excursion)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What growth factors are important in tendon healing and what are their roles?"
"Why does early controlled motion improve outcomes compared to immobilization?"
"What repair strength is needed to allow early active motion protocols?"
VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: Early Motion vs Immobilization

EXAMINER

"A 35-year-old laborer sustains a complete Zone 2 FDP laceration. After 4-strand core suture repair, should you immobilize or use early motion protocol? Justify your answer with the healing biology."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would use an early controlled motion protocol based on the healing biology and clinical evidence. The rationale involves understanding intrinsic versus extrinsic healing mechanisms. Intrinsic healing occurs when tenocytes within the tendon proliferate and synthesize organized collagen matrix directly at the repair site. This produces functional tendon with minimal adhesions and better long-term strength. Extrinsic healing occurs when peritendinous fibroblasts invade from the surrounding tissue and deposit disorganized scar tissue. This causes adhesions that bind the tendon to the flexor sheath and surrounding structures, severely limiting gliding and finger flexion. Immobilization promotes extrinsic healing because the tendon is static and peritendinous tissue fills the space around the repair. Early motion promotes intrinsic healing through several mechanisms: mechanical loading stimulates tenocyte proliferation and matrix synthesis, collagen fibers align along lines of stress improving tensile strength, tendon gliding prevents peritendinous adhesions from binding the tendon to the sheath, and joint motion prevents contractures. The proliferative phase from 7 days to 6 weeks is critical - this is when the healing pathway is determined. Zone 2 has particularly poor intrinsic healing potential because it is avascular, so any strategy that promotes intrinsic over extrinsic healing is crucial. The 4-strand core suture provides 40-60 Newtons of strength which is adequate for early active motion protocols - modern protocols like Indiana or Mayo allow gentle active flexion starting within days of surgery. The risk is gapping if loading is excessive, but the benefits of reduced adhesions and improved fiber alignment outweigh this risk. Studies by Gelberman and others have shown that early motion results in better range of motion, stronger repairs at 3-6 months, and fewer adhesiolysis surgeries compared to immobilization. I would counsel the patient that gentle controlled motion starting immediately is beneficial but he must adhere strictly to the protocol - no heavy gripping or forceful use of the hand for at least 6 weeks until proliferative phase is complete and collagen has begun remodeling.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Intrinsic (tenocyte) healing produces organized tendon, minimal adhesions
Extrinsic (fibroblast) healing produces scar and adhesions
Early motion promotes intrinsic over extrinsic healing
4-strand repair (40-60N) adequate for early active motion
Benefits: reduced adhesions, aligned collagen, better final ROM and strength
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending immobilization (outdated, leads to adhesions)
✗Not explaining the mechanism (intrinsic vs extrinsic pathway)
✗Missing the repair strength requirement (need 4-strand minimum for active motion)
✗Not acknowledging the balance between motion benefits and re-rupture risk
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What specific early motion protocol would you use for this patient?"
"At what time point can he return to unrestricted manual labor?"
"What are the indications for adhesiolysis surgery if motion remains limited?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 3: Growth Factors and Biological Augmentation

EXAMINER

"The patient asks about platelet-rich plasma injection to speed healing of his Achilles tendon repair. Discuss the growth factors involved in tendon healing and the evidence for PRP use."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would explain the biology and then the evidence for PRP. Tendon healing is regulated by multiple growth factors released in sequence. First, PDGF is released from platelet alpha granules immediately after injury and acts as a chemotactic factor recruiting inflammatory cells and fibroblasts to the healing site. It also stimulates cell proliferation. Second, TGF-beta has a critical but dual role - it is the most abundant growth factor and powerfully stimulates fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis, which is necessary for healing. However, excessive TGF-beta, particularly the beta-1 isoform, leads to excessive scarring and adhesion formation. The beta-3 isoform has anti-scarring properties and is being investigated. Third, VEGF is the master regulator of angiogenesis, driving new blood vessel formation which peaks at 1-2 weeks. Increased vascularity delivers nutrients and cells to the healing site. However, persistent neovascularization beyond 6 weeks is associated with chronic tendinopathy. Fourth, IGF-1 promotes tenocyte proliferation and specifically upregulates Type I collagen synthesis, which is stronger than Type III. It also has anti-apoptotic effects supporting cell survival. Fifth, bFGF stimulates cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and matrix synthesis with synergy with VEGF. Regarding PRP, it is an autologous concentration of platelets 3-5 times above baseline which contains physiologic ratios of these growth factors. The theoretical benefit is delivering a supraphysiologic dose to the healing site to accelerate and enhance the proliferative phase. However, the clinical evidence is mixed. Some meta-analyses show benefit for Achilles tendinopathy and rotator cuff repair with modest improvements in functional scores and possibly reduced re-tear rates. But there is high heterogeneity in studies due to variable preparation protocols - some are leukocyte-rich which may increase inflammation, others leukocyte-poor, some are activated while others are not, and concentration ratios vary widely. There is theoretical concern about delivering excessive TGF-beta which could promote fibrosis and adhesions. The evidence does not support routine use for acute Achilles repair. For this patient with standard surgical repair, I would explain that PRP is not a magic bullet, the evidence for acute repairs is limited, and the standard healing biology over 4-6 months will occur regardless. I would not recommend it routinely but could consider it in a high-risk patient such as a diabetic smoker with multiple risk factors for poor healing. The mainstay of successful healing is a strong anatomic repair with appropriate rehabilitation, not biological augmentation.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Key growth factors: PDGF (recruitment), TGF-β (collagen synthesis but also scarring), VEGF (angiogenesis), IGF-1 (Type I collagen), bFGF (proliferation)
PRP contains physiologic mixture of growth factors from concentrated platelets
Evidence mixed: some benefit for tendinopathy and cuff repair, but high heterogeneity
Variable preparation protocols limit interpretation
Not recommended routinely; may consider in high-risk cases
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending PRP without discussing limited evidence (inappropriate)
✗Not explaining individual growth factor roles (shows lack of depth)
✗Missing TGF-β dual role (essential but can cause scarring)
✗Not acknowledging that repair quality and rehabilitation are more important than biologics
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What other biological augmentation strategies are being investigated?"
"How do NSAIDs and corticosteroids affect tendon healing?"
"What patient factors predict poor healing outcomes?"

Key Exam Points and MCQ Practice

Three Phases Question

Q: What are the three phases of tendon healing and their approximate durations? A: Inflammatory (0-7 days), Proliferative (7 days to 6 weeks), Remodeling (6 weeks to 12+ months). Phases overlap and exact timing varies by tendon type and injury severity.

Collagen Type Question

Q: Which collagen type appears first during tendon healing and what is the final Type I:III ratio? A: Type III collagen appears first (1-2 weeks), forming disorganized scar. Gradually replaced by Type I over months. Normal ratio is 19:1 but healed tendon achieves only 2:1 to 3:1 at 12+ months.

Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Question

Q: What is the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic tendon healing? A: Intrinsic: Tenocytes proliferate and synthesize organized matrix - minimal adhesions, better function. Extrinsic: Peritendinous fibroblasts invade and deposit scar - adhesions form, poorer function. Early motion promotes intrinsic over extrinsic.

Growth Factor Question

Q: Which growth factor is most abundant in tendon healing and what is its dual role? A: TGF-β (particularly β1 isoform) is most abundant. Dual role: essential for collagen synthesis and healing, but excess causes scarring and adhesions. TGF-β3 has anti-scarring properties.

Final Strength Question

Q: What percentage of normal tendon strength is achieved by healed tendon at 12 months? A: 60-80% of normal tensile strength. Never reaches 100% due to persistent Type III collagen, suboptimal fiber alignment, and altered matrix composition. Explains ongoing re-rupture risk.

Zone 2 Question

Q: Why do Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries have the poorest prognosis? A: Four reasons: (1) Avascular - poor intrinsic healing, (2) Enclosed flexor sheath - promotes extrinsic healing and adhesions, (3) High excursion (7-8cm gliding) - adhesions severely limit function, (4) Critical balance - need aggressive early motion (prevent adhesions) but higher re-rupture risk.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Tendon Healing
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Tendon HealingCredit: OrthoVellum

TENDON HEALING

High-Yield Exam Summary

Three Phases

  • •Inflammatory (0-7 days): Hematoma, neutrophils then macrophages (M1 to M2), growth factors released, minimal strength (0-10%)
  • •Proliferative (7d-6wk): Tenocyte proliferation, Type III collagen synthesis, neovascularization peaks (3-4wk), strength to 30%
  • •Remodeling (6wk-12+mo): Type I replaces Type III, fiber alignment, MMP remodeling, strength to 60-80%

Intrinsic vs Extrinsic

  • •Intrinsic: Tenocytes synthesize organized collagen, minimal adhesions, better function (promote with early motion)
  • •Extrinsic: Peritendinous fibroblasts deposit scar, adhesions, poorer function (minimize by early motion)
  • •Early controlled motion promotes intrinsic over extrinsic healing

Collagen Transition

  • •Type III (thin, weak) appears first at 1-2 weeks, peaks at 2-3 weeks
  • •Type I (thick, strong) replaces Type III from 6 weeks onward
  • •Type I:III ratio: Normal 19:1, Healed 2:1 to 3:1 (never returns to normal)
  • •Tensile strength correlates with Type I content and fiber alignment

Key Growth Factors

  • •PDGF: Chemotactic, recruits cells (early phase)
  • •TGF-β: Collagen synthesis, cell proliferation (but excess causes scarring)
  • •VEGF: Angiogenesis (peaks 1-2 weeks, needed early, problematic if persistent)
  • •IGF-1: Tenocyte proliferation, Type I collagen synthesis
  • •bFGF: Cell proliferation, matrix synthesis, synergy with VEGF

Factors Affecting Healing

  • •Vascularity: Better blood supply equals better healing (Zone 1 better than Zone 2)
  • •Zone: Zone 2 flexor tendons worst (avascular, synovial sheath, high excursion)
  • •Motion: Early controlled motion better than immobilization (intrinsic healing, fiber alignment, prevent adhesions)
  • •Repair quality: Strong repair (4-strand, 40-60N) allows early motion without gapping
  • •Biologics: Age, diabetes, smoking impair healing; NSAIDs may impair (controversial)

Clinical Pearls

  • •Gap healing (under 3mm) better than proliferative healing (over 3mm, adhesions)
  • •4-strand minimum for early active motion (2-strand passive only)
  • •Zone 2 requires aggressive early motion protocols (Kleinert, Duran, Indiana, Mayo)
  • •Final strength 60-80% explains ongoing re-rupture risk
  • •PRP evidence mixed, not routine, may consider in high-risk patients
Quick Stats
Reading Time92 min
Related Topics

Articular Cartilage Structure and Function

Bending Moment Distribution in Fracture Fixation

Biceps Femoris Short Head Anatomy

Biofilm Formation in Orthopaedic Infections