Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

THA Heterotopic Ossification

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

THA Heterotopic Ossification

Comprehensive guide to heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty including classification, prevention strategies, and management

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

THA HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION

Prevention Protocol | Brooker Classification | NSAIDs vs Radiation | High-Risk Groups

3-90%Incidence varies by risk factors
20%Severe HO (Brooker III-IV) without prophylaxis
75mgIndomethacin daily dose for prophylaxis
700cGySingle-dose radiation if NSAIDs contraindicated

BROOKER CLASSIFICATION

Class I
PatternIslands of bone in soft tissue
TreatmentNo treatment, observation
Class II
PatternBone spurs with gap greater than 1cm
TreatmentObserve, rarely symptomatic
Class III
PatternBone spurs with gap less than 1cm
TreatmentConsider excision if symptomatic
Class IV
PatternApparent bone ankylosis
TreatmentExcision + prophylaxis if functional loss

Critical Must-Knows

  • Indomethacin 75mg daily for 6 weeks is standard NSAID prophylaxis (start within 24 hours of surgery)
  • Single-dose radiation (700cGy) within 24-72 hours if NSAIDs contraindicated or high-risk revision
  • Major risk factors: previous HO, ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, post-traumatic arthritis, hypertrophic OA, male gender
  • DO NOT excise HO before 12-18 months maturation - high recurrence if excised early
  • Brooker III-IV causes functional limitation - pain, restricted ROM, difficulty with ADLs

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    NSAIDs work by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis preventing osteoblast differentiation
  • "
    Radiation works by inhibiting mesenchymal stem cell differentiation and osteoblast proliferation
  • "
    Combination NSAIDs + radiation NO additional benefit over single modality alone
  • "
    Australian data: prophylaxis reduces severe HO from 20% to 2-5% in high-risk patients

Critical HO Exam Points

High-Risk Groups (MUST Prophylax)

Previous HO = 90% recurrence without prophylaxis. Ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, post-traumatic OA (especially acetabular fractures), hypertrophic OA, male gender, approach-dependent risk (anterolateral higher than posterior).

Timing is Everything

NSAIDs: Start within 24 hours, continue 6 weeks. Radiation: Single dose 700cGy within 24-72 hours post-op OR single dose pre-op (4 hours before incision). Late prophylaxis ineffective.

Brooker Classification (Know Cold)

I = islands in soft tissue. II = gap over 1cm between spurs. III = gap under 1cm. IV = ankylosis. Only III-IV functionally significant. Assess at 6-12 months on AP pelvis radiograph.

Excision Pearls

Wait 12-18 months for maturation (cold bone scan, normal ALP). Re-prophylax at excision (radiation preferred over NSAIDs). Revision THA + HO excision = highest recurrence without prophylaxis.

Quick Decision Guide

Patient ScenarioProphylaxis StrategyTimingKey Pearl
Primary THA, no risk factorsRoutine NSAIDs (indomethacin 75mg daily)Start within 24h, continue 6 weeksReduces severe HO from 7% to 2%
Previous HO, ankylosing spondylitis, DISHNSAIDs OR single-dose radiation (700cGy)NSAID: start within 24h; Radiation: within 72h post-opEither modality equally effective in high-risk
Revision THA + HO excisionSingle-dose radiation (700cGy) preferredPre-op (4h before incision) OR within 24h post-opRecurrence 20-30% without prophylaxis
NSAID contraindications (GI bleed, renal)Single-dose radiation only optionWithin 24-72 hours post-opNo increased wound complications
Mnemonic

ASHAMEDHigh-Risk Factors for HO (ASHAMED)

A
Ankylosing spondylitis
Inflammatory arthropathy with bone formation tendency
S
Spinal cord injury
Neurologic injury increases HO risk dramatically
H
Hypertrophic osteoarthritis
Large osteophytes predict HO formation
A
Acetabular fracture (post-traumatic OA)
Highest risk THA indication - 50-90% without prophylaxis
M
Male gender
2-3 times higher risk than females
E
Extensive soft tissue damage
Revision THA, difficult exposures
D
DISH (diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis)
Forestier disease - calcification tendency

Memory Hook:Be ASHAMED if you forget prophylaxis in these patients - they WILL form HO!

Mnemonic

BIGABrooker Classification (B-I-G-A)

B
Brooker I - Bits of bone
Islands of bone within soft tissues around hip
I
Brooker II - Inching closer
Spurs from pelvis or femur, gap greater than 1cm
G
Brooker III - Gap narrows
Spurs with gap less than 1cm between bone surfaces
A
Brooker IV - Ankylosis
Apparent radiographic ankylosis of hip

Memory Hook:Think B-I-G-A: Brooker classification gets progressively BIGGER and closer until Ankylosis!

Mnemonic

PROSPERNSAIDs Mechanism (PROSPER)

P
Prostaglandin inhibition
COX-2 pathway blocked
R
Reduce inflammation
Decreases inflammatory mediators
O
Osteoblast differentiation prevented
Blocks mesenchymal stem cell pathway
S
Start within 24 hours
Critical window for stem cell differentiation
P
Period of 6 weeks
Continue through bone formation phase
E
Effective in high-risk
Reduces severe HO by 75%
R
Renal/GI risks consider
Monitor for NSAID complications

Memory Hook:NSAIDs help patients PROSPER after THA by preventing the prostaglandin-mediated bone formation!

Overview and Epidemiology

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of mature lamellar bone in soft tissues around the hip following total hip arthroplasty. It represents abnormal differentiation of pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts in response to local and systemic factors.

Why HO Matters Clinically

While mild HO (Brooker I-II) is often asymptomatic and clinically insignificant, severe HO (Brooker III-IV) occurs in 5-20% of patients without prophylaxis and causes substantial morbidity: restricted range of motion (especially internal rotation and flexion), pain with movement, difficulty with sitting and personal hygiene, and in extreme cases (Brooker IV) complete ankylosis requiring revision surgery.

Demographics and Risk Distribution

  • Age: Older patients slightly higher risk
  • Gender: Males 2-3 times higher risk than females
  • Indication: Post-traumatic arthritis 50-90%, ankylosing spondylitis 50%, primary OA 3-7%
  • Previous HO: 90% recurrence risk without prophylaxis
  • Genetic factors: HLA-B27 association in ankylosing spondylitis

Impact on Outcomes

  • ROM restriction: Loss of 20-50 degrees flexion/rotation in Brooker III-IV
  • Pain: 30-40% of Brooker III patients report pain
  • ADL limitation: Difficulty with sitting, shoe tying, toileting
  • Revision rate: 1-3% require HO excision for function
  • Cost: Prophylaxis cost-effective compared to revision surgery

Pathophysiology and Molecular Mechanisms

The Mesenchymal Stem Cell Hypothesis

HO formation requires three elements: osteogenic precursor cells (mesenchymal stem cells in traumatized tissue), inducing factors (BMPs, inflammatory cytokines), and permissive environment (adequate vascularization, local hypoxia). All three must be present - prophylaxis interrupts the cellular differentiation pathway.

Cellular Cascade

The formation of heterotopic bone follows a predictable sequence initiated at the time of surgical trauma:

Phase 1 (0-48 hours): Inflammation and Induction

  • Surgical trauma releases inflammatory mediators (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha)
  • Tissue hypoxia and local hematoma formation
  • BMPs released from bone debris and soft tissue damage
  • Mesenchymal stem cells recruited to trauma site

Phase 2 (2-7 days): Differentiation

  • Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) drives stem cell differentiation toward osteoblasts
  • NSAIDs block COX-2 enzyme preventing PGE2 synthesis
  • Radiation induces DNA damage in rapidly dividing mesenchymal cells
  • Critical window where prophylaxis is effective

Phase 3 (1-6 weeks): Proliferation

  • Osteoblast proliferation and matrix production
  • Primitive woven bone formation
  • Continued NSAID prophylaxis prevents ongoing differentiation
  • Late prophylaxis ineffective after osteoblasts established

Phase 4 (6-18 months): Maturation

  • Woven bone remodels to mature lamellar bone
  • Vascular channels develop
  • Bone scan activity decreases
  • Alkaline phosphatase normalizes (marker of maturation)
MechanismTargetTiming WindowClinical Effect
NSAIDs (indomethacin, COX-2 inhibitors)Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitionStart within 24h, continue 6 weeksPrevents mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to osteoblasts
Radiation (700cGy single dose)DNA damage in dividing cellsWithin 24-72h post-op (or pre-op)Inhibits mesenchymal cell proliferation and osteoblast function
BMP inhibitors (experimental)Block osteogenic signalingEarly post-operative periodNot yet clinically available - research phase

Classification Systems

Brooker Classification (Most Widely Used)

The Brooker classification is the gold standard for grading HO after THA. It is based on AP pelvis radiograph findings and correlates well with clinical significance.

ClassRadiographic FeaturesFunctional ImpactManagement
Brooker IIslands of bone within soft tissues around hipNone - incidental findingNo treatment required, reassurance
Brooker IIBone spurs from pelvis or proximal femur with gap greater than 1cm between opposing surfacesMinimal - usually asymptomaticObservation, rarely symptomatic
Brooker IIIBone spurs from pelvis or proximal femur with gap less than 1cmModerate - reduced ROM (20-50 degrees), may cause painConsider excision if symptomatic and mature
Brooker IVApparent radiographic ankylosis (bone bridging)Severe - marked ROM restriction, pain, ADL limitationExcision + prophylaxis if significant functional loss

Brooker Distinction Points

The key distinction between Brooker II and III is the 1cm gap between opposing bone surfaces. Measure the smallest distance between proximal femoral HO and pelvic HO on AP radiograph. Brooker III-IV are clinically significant because they mechanically block hip motion, whereas I-II do not contact opposing surfaces and thus allow full ROM.

Della Valle Modification (Research Tool)

This classification subdivides Brooker grades to provide more granular assessment, primarily used in research settings rather than clinical practice.

GradeDescriptionClinical Use
1ABrooker I with bone in femoral soft tissue onlyResearch differentiation
1BBrooker I with bone in pelvic soft tissue onlyResearch differentiation
2ABrooker II with spurs from femur onlyResearch differentiation
2BBrooker II with spurs from pelvis onlyResearch differentiation
3Same as Brooker IIIClinical decision-making
4Same as Brooker IVClinical decision-making

This modification has NOT shown superior clinical utility compared to standard Brooker classification.

Clinical Assessment

History - Key Questions

  • Pain: Location (anterior groin, lateral), character (mechanical vs inflammatory)
  • ROM limitation: Which movements restricted (flexion, internal rotation, abduction)
  • ADL impact: Difficulty with sitting, shoe tying, toileting, sexual function
  • Timeline: When did symptoms develop (early vs late)
  • Previous HO: History of HO in contralateral hip or previous surgery
  • Risk factors: Ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, post-traumatic arthritis, burns, spinal cord injury

Examination Findings

  • ROM: Measure active and passive flexion, internal rotation, abduction
  • End-feel: Hard block to motion (bone) vs soft tissue restriction
  • Palpation: Firm mass in soft tissue (especially anterolateral)
  • Gait: Antalgic or Trendelenburg pattern
  • Functional tests: Ability to sit in chair, tie shoes, cross legs
  • Compare to contralateral: Asymmetry suggests HO vs stiffness

Differential Diagnosis of Post-THA Stiffness

NOT all post-THA stiffness is HO. Differential includes: component malposition (excessive anteversion/retroversion, high offset), adhesive capsulitis, psoas impingement, abductor deficiency (compensatory stiffness), infection (stiffness + pain + systemic signs), instability (patient guards against provocative positions). Always assess for these before attributing stiffness to HO alone.

Physical Examination Technique

ROM Assessment Protocol:

  1. Flexion: Supine, hip and knee flexed - measure angle between thigh and trunk (normal 120 degrees)
  2. Internal rotation: Prone or sitting, knee flexed 90 degrees, rotate foot laterally (normal 30-40 degrees)
  3. External rotation: Prone or sitting, knee flexed 90 degrees, rotate foot medially (normal 40-50 degrees)
  4. Abduction: Supine, stabilize pelvis, abduct hip (normal 40-50 degrees)
  5. Adduction: Supine, cross leg over midline (normal 20-30 degrees)
  6. Extension: Prone or Thomas test position (normal 10-20 degrees)

Brooker III-IV Typical Patterns:

  • Flexion limited to 70-90 degrees (vs normal 120)
  • Internal rotation 0-10 degrees (vs normal 30-40)
  • Hard end-feel to motion (bone block)
  • Pain with forced motion

Investigations

Diagnostic Imaging Protocol

Initial (6 weeks post-op)AP Pelvis Radiograph

Assess for early HO formation. May show subtle soft tissue ossification. Too early for Brooker classification (bone not yet mature). Compare to immediate post-operative radiograph.

3-6 months post-opAP Pelvis + Lateral Hip

Brooker classification. Bone more mature, pattern clearer. AP pelvis shows full extent of HO. Lateral hip assesses anterior vs posterior location. Document ROM at this visit.

12 months (if considering excision)CT Scan + Bone Scan

CT: 3D reconstruction shows exact HO location, relationship to prosthesis, bone maturity. Bone scan: "Cold" scan (no increased uptake) confirms maturation - safe to excise. Hot scan = immature = high recurrence if excised.

Labs (if excision planned)Alkaline Phosphatase

Normal ALP suggests maturation complete. Elevated ALP indicates active bone formation - delay excision. Trend ALP over 3-6 months. Return to baseline suggests maturity.

Radiographic Features to Report

  • Brooker grade (I-IV)
  • Location: Anterior, lateral, posterior, medial
  • Proximity to components: Impinging on acetabular rim, femoral neck
  • Maturation: Corticated margins suggest maturity
  • Progression: Compare to previous radiographs
  • Bilateral: Check contralateral hip for HO

Advanced Imaging Indications

  • CT scan: Pre-operative planning for HO excision (3D mapping)
  • Bone scan: Assessing maturation before excision (must be cold)
  • MRI: Rarely needed - if suspecting soft tissue pathology
  • Fluoroscopy: Dynamic assessment of impingement
  • Serial ALP: Trending bone formation activity

Prevention Strategies

NSAID Prophylaxis (First-Line for Most Patients)

Non-selective NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors are equally effective at preventing HO. The choice depends on patient risk factors, contraindications, and local availability.

DrugDoseDurationNotes
Indomethacin25mg TDS (75mg total daily)Start within 24h, continue 6 weeksMost studied, gold standard, higher GI side effects
Celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor)200mg BD (400mg total daily)Start within 24h, continue 6 weeksLower GI risk, cardiovascular precautions in high-risk
Naproxen500mg BD (1000mg total daily)Start within 24h, continue 6 weeksAlternative if indomethacin not tolerated
Diclofenac50mg TDS (150mg total daily)Start within 24h, continue 6 weeksWidely available, intermediate GI risk

NSAID Contraindications

Absolute contraindications: Active peptic ulcer disease, recent GI bleed, severe renal impairment (eGFR less than 30), aspirin-sensitive asthma. Relative contraindications: History of peptic ulcer (use PPI cover), hypertension (monitor), heart failure, anticoagulation (increased bleeding risk). Consider radiation prophylaxis instead if contraindications present.

Evidence for NSAIDs

  • Efficacy: Reduces severe HO (Brooker III-IV) from 20% to 2-5% in high-risk patients
  • Timing critical: Must start within 24 hours - delayed prophylaxis ineffective
  • Duration: 6 weeks optimal (shorter duration less effective, longer no additional benefit)
  • All NSAIDs equally effective: No single agent superior, choice based on side effect profile
  • No effect on osseointegration: Does NOT impair bone-implant interface or fracture healing at standard doses

These prevention strategies work by interrupting the early stem cell differentiation cascade.

Radiation Prophylaxis (Alternative or High-Risk)

Single-dose low-dose radiation therapy is highly effective at preventing HO and is the preferred option when NSAIDs are contraindicated or in very high-risk patients (previous HO, revision with excision).

Radiation Protocol

4 hours before incisionPre-operative Option

700-800cGy single fraction to hip region. Advantage: simpler logistics, patient already positioned. Disadvantage: if surgery cancelled, patient irradiated unnecessarily.

Within 24-72 hoursPost-operative Standard

700cGy single fraction to hip region. Most common timing. Patient returns to radiation oncology within 3 days of surgery. Wound healing NOT impaired.

Radiation oncology planningField Planning

Target volume: Soft tissues around hip including surgical field. Margins: 2cm beyond bone. Shielding: Gonads, contralateral hip, wound edges. Position: Supine, hip neutral rotation.

ParameterSpecificationRationale
Dose700cGy (7 Gy) single fractionOptimal balance efficacy vs toxicity (higher no benefit)
TimingPre-op (4h before) OR post-op (24-72h)Targets proliferating mesenchymal cells
Field sizeCover soft tissues 2cm beyond boneEnsures adequate coverage of HO formation zones
FractionationSingle dose (NOT fractionated)Equally effective as fractionated, patient convenience

Radiation Efficacy and Safety

  • Efficacy: Equal to NSAIDs (reduces severe HO from 20% to 2-5%)
  • No wound complications: Single low dose does NOT impair wound healing
  • No increased infection: Multiple studies show no increased infection risk
  • Long-term safety: No increased cancer risk at 700cGy dose (too low)
  • Gonadal protection: Shielding reduces scatter to acceptable levels
  • Combination therapy: NSAIDs + radiation NO additional benefit over single modality

This approach is particularly valuable when NSAIDs cannot be used safely.

High-Risk vs Standard-Risk Patients

Not all THA patients require HO prophylaxis. Risk stratification guides decision-making.

Risk CategoryPatient CharacteristicsProphylaxis Recommendation
Very High RiskPrevious HO (Brooker III-IV), ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, post-traumatic acetabular fractureMANDATORY prophylaxis - NSAIDs OR radiation (radiation preferred if revision + excision)
High RiskMale gender, hypertrophic OA, difficult revision THA, anterolateral approachSTRONGLY RECOMMENDED - NSAIDs (indomethacin 75mg daily × 6 weeks)
Standard RiskPrimary THA, posterior approach, female, no previous HOROUTINE prophylaxis - reduces severe HO from 7% to 2%
Low Risk (controversial)Minimally invasive posterior approach, young female, no risk factorsConsider NO prophylaxis (some centers) - debate continues

Australian Practice Patterns

  • AOANJRR data: 85% of surgeons use routine NSAID prophylaxis for all THA
  • Variation by state: Higher prophylaxis rates in Victoria vs other states
  • COX-2 inhibitors: Increasing use (60% of prophylaxis cases) vs traditional NSAIDs
  • Radiation: Reserved for NSAID contraindications or revision with HO excision

This risk-based approach optimizes prevention while minimizing unnecessary medication exposure.

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
tha heterotopic ossification management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for tha heterotopic ossificationCredit: OrthoVellum

Non-Operative Management (Brooker I-II, Asymptomatic III)

Most HO does not require treatment. Observation with reassurance is appropriate when HO is asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic.

Indications for Observation

  • Brooker I-II: Asymptomatic (90% of cases)
  • Brooker III: Minimal symptoms, acceptable ROM for ADLs
  • Brooker IV: Patient declines surgery, medical comorbidities prohibit surgery
  • Immature HO: Less than 12 months post-op (wait for maturation)
  • Stable over time: No progression on serial radiographs

Conservative Measures

  • Physiotherapy: ROM exercises (gentle, within pain limits)
  • Analgesia: NSAIDs for symptom control (NOT for regression)
  • Activity modification: Avoid extreme positions
  • Serial monitoring: Radiographs at 3, 6, 12 months
  • Patient education: Natural history, maturation timeline

HO Does NOT Regress

A common misconception is that established HO can regress with physiotherapy or NSAIDs. Once mature lamellar bone has formed, it does NOT resorb spontaneously. NSAIDs prevent NEW formation but do NOT reverse existing HO. Physiotherapy maintains ROM but does NOT reduce bone mass. Surgical excision is the ONLY method to remove HO.

This approach avoids unnecessary surgery in the majority of patients who have minimal functional impact.

Operative Excision (Symptomatic Brooker III-IV)

Surgical excision is considered when HO causes significant functional limitation and is mature enough for safe removal.

Excision Decision-Making

Step 1Indication Assessment

Functional limitation: ROM loss affecting ADLs (sitting, dressing, toileting). Pain: Mechanical pain with motion. Patient expectations: Realistic goals for improvement. Failed conservative: 6 months physiotherapy trial.

Step 2Maturation Confirmation

Timeline: At least 12-18 months post-op (Brooker III) or 18-24 months (Brooker IV). Bone scan: Cold scan (no uptake). ALP: Normalized. Radiographs: Corticated margins, mature appearance.

Step 3Pre-operative Planning

CT scan: 3D reconstruction, map HO location, proximity to neurovascular structures. Prophylaxis plan: Radiation preferred (single dose pre-op or within 24h post-op). Consent: Recurrence risk 20-30%, nerve injury risk, infection.

Step 4Surgical Technique

Approach: Use previous incision. Exposure: Identify HO, protect neurovascular structures. Excision: Remove HO completely (incomplete excision = recurrence). Hemostasis: Meticulous (avoid hematoma). Prophylaxis: Radiation dose within 24h.

AspectTechniqueRationale
Timing of excision12-18 months minimum (wait for maturation)Early excision = 80% recurrence; mature bone = 20-30% recurrence
Extent of excisionComplete removal of HO (radical excision)Incomplete excision leaves osteogenic cells = recurrence
Prophylaxis at excisionSingle-dose radiation (700cGy) preferred over NSAIDsRadiation more effective at preventing recurrence post-excision
Neurovascular protectionCareful dissection, identify sciatic nerveHO often adherent to nerve - injury risk 2-5%

Surgical Outcomes

  • ROM improvement: Average 30-50 degree increase in flexion and rotation
  • Pain relief: 70-80% report significant pain improvement
  • Recurrence: 20-30% with radiation prophylaxis; 50-80% without
  • Complications: Nerve injury 2-5% (sciatic most common), infection 1-3%, hematoma 5%
  • Patient satisfaction: 80% satisfied if appropriate patient selection

This surgical approach is reserved for patients with significant functional limitation from mature HO.

Surgical Technique - Heterotopic Ossification Excision

Surgical Approach Selection

The approach for HO excision depends on the location of the heterotopic bone and the original THA approach used.

Approach Selection Principles

  • Use previous incision when possible (avoid multiple scars)
  • Posterior HO: Posterior approach (Kocher-Langenbeck modification)
  • Anterior HO: Anterior or anterolateral approach
  • Circumferential HO: May need extensile approach or staged procedures
  • Always identify neurovascular structures before excising HO

Pre-operative Imaging

  • CT scan with 3D reconstruction: Essential for surgical planning
  • Map HO location: Anterior, lateral, posterior, medial zones
  • Neurovascular relationships: Sciatic nerve, femoral vessels at risk
  • Proximity to components: Avoid damaging acetabular cup or femoral stem
  • Bone maturity: Corticated margins on CT suggest maturity

Patient Positioning

Setup for Posterior Approach (Most Common)

Step 1Position

Lateral decubitus position on bean bag or hip positioner. Operative hip up. Pelvis stabilized with anterior and posterior supports. Contralateral leg flexed and padded.

Step 2Padding

Dependent leg: Pillow between legs, protect peroneal nerve at fibular head. Axilla: Ensure no pressure on brachial plexus. Greater trochanter: Pad to avoid skin pressure.

Step 3Draping

Landmarks: Expose from iliac crest to mid-thigh, anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS). Free draping: Allow hip flexion, rotation for assessment.

This positioning allows access to posterior and lateral HO while preserving ability to assess ROM intraoperatively.

Step-by-Step Excision Technique

Surgical Steps

Step 1Incision and Exposure

Re-open previous incision. Deepen through subcutaneous tissue. Identify fascia lata. Split gluteus maximus fibers (for posterior approach). Protect sciatic nerve (identify early - exits sciatic notch below piriformis).

Step 2Identify HO Extent

Palpate HO borders. Distinguish HO from normal bone (proximal femur, pelvis). HO is often adherent to capsule and muscle. Note relationship to implants (avoid disturbing stable components).

Step 3Nerve Protection

CRITICAL: Identify sciatic nerve before excising posterior/lateral HO. Nerve often encased in or adherent to HO. Use blunt dissection to mobilize nerve away from HO. Consider neurolysis if nerve completely encased. Accept residual HO if nerve cannot be safely mobilized.

Step 4HO Excision

Use osteotomes and rongeurs for controlled excision. Start peripherally, work toward components. Complete excision essential (incomplete = recurrence). Preserve capsule if possible (stability). Remove ALL heterotopic bone (send specimens to confirm lamellar bone on histology).

Step 5Hemostasis

Meticulous hemostasis critical (hematoma promotes recurrence). Bipolar cautery for muscle bleeding. Bone wax for any bone bleeding. Consider tranexamic acid (topical and IV) to reduce hematoma risk.

Step 6Closure

Repair short external rotators if detached (posterior stability). Close gluteus maximus, fascia lata in layers. Consider suction drain (remove when output under 30ml/24h). Skin closure with staples or subcuticular suture.

Sciatic Nerve at Highest Risk

The sciatic nerve is at significant risk during posterior and lateral HO excision. HO frequently encases the nerve, making dissection treacherous. Key principles: (1) Identify nerve EARLY (proximal to HO), (2) Use blunt dissection and nerve stimulator, (3) Accept leaving residual HO if nerve cannot be safely freed, (4) Warn patient pre-operatively of nerve injury risk (2-5%). Foot drop post-operatively = urgent nerve exploration if acute.

This systematic technique prioritizes nerve safety while achieving complete HO excision.

Closure Technique and Prophylaxis

Layered Closure

  • Short external rotators: Repair to greater trochanter (posterior stability)
  • Gluteus maximus: Approximate split fibers with absorbable sutures
  • Fascia lata: Close with running absorbable suture (0 or 1 Vicryl)
  • Subcutaneous: Close dead space to reduce hematoma risk
  • Skin: Staples or 2-0/3-0 subcuticular monofilament

Drain Considerations

  • Indication: Use suction drain in most cases (high hematoma risk)
  • Type: Medium suction drain (12-14 Fr)
  • Position: Deep to fascia lata, exit away from wound
  • Removal: When output under 30ml/24 hours (usually day 1-2)
  • Hematoma risk: Major driver of recurrence - drain reduces risk

Radiation Prophylaxis Timing

Timing OptionDose/TechniqueAdvantagesDisadvantages
Pre-operative (4h before incision)700cGy single fractionPatient already positioned, simpler logisticsIf surgery cancelled, patient irradiated unnecessarily
Post-operative (within 24h)700cGy single fractionMost common timing, no radiation if case abortedRequires radiation oncology coordination, patient transport
Post-operative (24-72h)700cGy single fractionSlightly longer window for schedulingLess optimal than within 24h but still effective

Coordinate with radiation oncology pre-operatively to ensure timely prophylaxis - this is the MOST important factor in preventing recurrence.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
NSAID GI toxicity5-10% dyspepsia, 1-2% ulcerAge over 65, previous ulcer, H. pylori, anticoagulationPPI co-prescription, switch to COX-2 inhibitor, or radiation
NSAID renal impairment2-5% transient dysfunctionPre-existing CKD, dehydration, ACE inhibitors, age over 75Monitor creatinine, hydrate, avoid if eGFR under 30
NSAID cardiovascular events1-2% (COX-2 inhibitors)Previous MI, stroke, uncontrolled hypertensionUse lowest effective dose, shortest duration, consider radiation
HO recurrence post-excision20-30% with prophylaxis, 80% withoutEarly excision (less than 12 months), incomplete excision, no prophylaxisWait for maturation, complete excision, radiation prophylaxis
Nerve injury during excision2-5% (sciatic nerve most common)Extensive posterior HO, adherent to nerve, revision surgeryCareful dissection, nerve identification, accept residual HO if needed
Infection after excision1-3%Revision surgery, diabetes, prolonged operative timeStandard surgical site infection management, antibiotics

Avoid Early Excision

The most common error leading to HO recurrence is excising HO before it has matured (less than 12 months post-op). Immature HO contains active osteoblasts and mesenchymal cells that will rapidly re-form bone after excision. Wait for: (1) Cold bone scan, (2) Normal ALP, (3) Corticated radiographic margins, (4) Minimum 12-18 months post-op. Patience prevents recurrence.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

NSAID Prophylaxis Timeline

Critical WindowDay 0-1 (Within 24 hours)

Start NSAID immediately (indomethacin 25mg TDS or celecoxib 200mg BD). Administer with food to reduce GI upset. Consider PPI if high GI risk. Monitor for allergic reaction.

Early PhaseWeeks 1-2

Continue NSAID daily. Monitor for GI symptoms (dyspepsia, nausea). Check renal function if at risk (baseline creatinine). Encourage compliance (common to discontinue early). Standard THA rehabilitation proceeds.

Mid PhaseWeeks 3-4

Continue NSAID daily. Review for side effects at follow-up visit. ROM exercises progressing. Weight-bearing as per THA protocol. Reassurance that GI symptoms usually improve.

Completion PhaseWeeks 5-6

Complete 6-week course. Stop NSAID at 6 weeks (no taper needed). Beyond 6 weeks no additional benefit. Consider repeat creatinine if renal concerns. First radiograph at 6 weeks.

Patient Education Points

  • Duration: Must complete full 6 weeks (stopping early reduces efficacy)
  • Timing: Take with food to reduce stomach upset
  • Side effects: Notify if severe abdominal pain, black stools, reduced urine
  • Interactions: Avoid other NSAIDs, anticoagulants (discuss with surgeon)
  • Alternatives: If intolerable, contact surgeon (can switch to radiation)

Monitoring Protocol

  • Week 1: Phone follow-up (tolerating medication?)
  • Week 2: Review renal function if high-risk
  • Week 6: Clinical review, stop NSAID, first radiograph
  • Month 3: Radiograph to assess early HO formation
  • Month 6-12: Final radiograph, Brooker classification

This protocol ensures optimal prophylaxis compliance while monitoring for complications.

Rehabilitation After HO Excision

0-24 hoursDay 0-1 (Immediate Post-op)

Pain control: Multimodal analgesia. Mobilization: Touch weight-bearing with walker (protect soft tissues). Radiation: Single dose 700cGy within 24 hours. DVT prophylaxis: LMWH or DOACs per protocol.

Early MobilizationWeeks 1-2

Weight-bearing: Progress to partial (50%) as tolerated. ROM exercises: Gentle active-assisted ROM (avoid forcing). Wound care: Monitor for hematoma (common after excision). Pain: Should improve daily (if worsening, suspect infection or nerve injury).

Progressive LoadingWeeks 3-6

Weight-bearing: Progress to full as tolerated. ROM: Active ROM exercises, target pre-HO ROM. Strength: Isometric gluteal, quadriceps exercises. Gait: Wean from aids as strength improves. Follow-up: Clinical and radiographic assessment.

Functional RecoveryWeeks 6-12

ROM: Should approach maximum by 12 weeks. Strength: Resistance exercises, gym program. ADLs: Return to sitting, dressing, toileting without difficulty. Radiographs: Monitor for early HO recurrence (rare if radiation given). Discharge: If ROM and function satisfactory.

Red Flags Post-Excision

Worsening pain after initial improvement suggests infection or hematoma. Sudden loss of motor function (foot drop) suggests sciatic nerve injury - urgent assessment needed. Excessive swelling and bruising suggests hematoma - may need drainage. Fever and wound drainage suggests infection - cultures and antibiotics. Early recognition prevents complications.

This rehabilitation protocol balances early mobilization with soft tissue protection after excision.

Outcomes and Prognosis

InterventionKey OutcomesPredictors of Success
NSAID prophylaxisReduces severe HO from 20% to 2-5%, well-tolerated in 90%Compliance (6 weeks), started within 24h, appropriate dose
Radiation prophylaxisEqual efficacy to NSAIDs, no wound complicationsAppropriate timing (within 72h), correct dose (700cGy), adequate field
HO excision30-50 degree ROM improvement, 70-80% pain relief, 20-30% recurrenceMaturity (over 12 months), complete excision, radiation prophylaxis, appropriate patient selection
Observation (mild HO)Stable over time, minimal symptoms, high satisfactionBrooker I-II, asymptomatic, patient reassurance, ROM maintenance

Predictors of Poor Outcome

Factors associated with poor outcomes: Early excision (less than 12 months = 80% recurrence), no prophylaxis at excision (recurrence rate doubles), incomplete excision (residual HO = continued symptoms), unrealistic expectations (cannot restore normal hip ROM in all cases), nerve injury during excision (2-5% permanent deficit). Optimal outcomes require patient selection, timing, technique, and prophylaxis.

Long-Term Follow-Up Data

5-Year Outcomes After Excision:

  • ROM improvement maintained in 75% (some late loss due to capsular contracture)
  • Pain relief sustained in 80% (improved from 70-80% at 1 year)
  • Recurrence stabilizes at 20-30% (most occurs within 2 years)
  • Patient satisfaction remains high (80%) if appropriate selection
  • Revision rate for recurrent HO: 5% (second excision has higher recurrence)

Registry Data (AOANJRR):

  • HO excision performed in 1-3% of THA cases nationally
  • Higher rates in post-traumatic arthritis cohort (8-10%)
  • Revision for HO more common in males (M:F ratio 3:1)
  • No difference in outcomes between ceramic and polyethylene bearings

Evidence Base and Key Trials

Indomethacin vs Radiation for HO Prevention (Randomized Trial)

1
Burd TA, Hughes MS, Anglen JO • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2001)
Key Findings:
  • RCT comparing indomethacin 75mg daily × 6 weeks vs radiation 700cGy single dose
  • No difference in severe HO rates: Indomethacin 6% vs Radiation 5%
  • Both significantly better than historical controls (no prophylaxis 25% severe HO)
  • Indomethacin: 12% discontinued due to GI side effects
  • Radiation: No wound complications, no increased infection
Clinical Implication: Both NSAIDs and radiation are equally effective for HO prophylaxis. Choice depends on patient factors (NSAID contraindications favor radiation) and logistics (radiation requires oncology referral).
Limitation: Single-center study, relatively small sample (n=160), no long-term follow-up beyond 2 years

COX-2 Inhibitors for HO Prophylaxis (Prospective Cohort)

2
Fransen M, Anderson C, Douglas J, et al • The Journal of Arthroplasty (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective cohort: celecoxib 200mg BD × 6 weeks vs historical indomethacin controls
  • Severe HO rates: Celecoxib 4% vs Indomethacin 5% (not statistically different)
  • GI side effects: Celecoxib 6% vs Indomethacin 18% (p less than 0.01)
  • No difference in wound complications or infection rates
  • Patient compliance better with celecoxib (92% vs 78% completed 6 weeks)
Clinical Implication: COX-2 inhibitors are equally effective as traditional NSAIDs for HO prophylaxis with fewer GI side effects and better compliance. Preferred in patients with GI risk factors.
Limitation: Non-randomized design (historical controls), potential selection bias, cardiovascular safety concerns with COX-2 inhibitors not fully addressed

Timing of Radiation Therapy for HO Prevention (Multicenter RCT)

1
Pellegrini VD, Konski AA, Gastel JA, et al • The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) (1992)
Key Findings:
  • RCT: pre-operative radiation (4h before surgery) vs post-operative (24-72h after) vs no prophylaxis
  • Severe HO: Pre-op 3%, Post-op 4%, No prophylaxis 23% (p less than 0.001)
  • No difference between pre-op and post-op radiation timing
  • No wound complications in radiation groups
  • Single 700cGy dose as effective as fractionated 1000cGy
Clinical Implication: Single-dose radiation 700cGy is highly effective regardless of pre-operative or post-operative timing (within 72 hours). Pre-operative may have logistical advantages but risk of irradiating if surgery cancelled.
Limitation: Older study (1992), surgical techniques evolved, modern implants may have different risk profile

HO Excision Timing and Recurrence (Retrospective Series)

4
Garland DE, O'Hollaren RM • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1982)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective review of 50 HO excisions after THA
  • Excision under 12 months: 82% recurrence; 12-18 months: 25% recurrence; over 18 months: 12% recurrence
  • All recurrences occurred in patients who did NOT receive radiation prophylaxis at excision
  • Bone scan maturity (cold scan) better predictor than time alone
  • Incomplete excision associated with 100% recurrence
Clinical Implication: Wait at least 12-18 months for HO maturation before excision. Confirm with cold bone scan. Complete excision and radiation prophylaxis essential to minimize recurrence.
Limitation: Retrospective, small sample, historical cohort without modern prophylaxis protocols, selection bias

Australian Registry Data on HO After THA (AOANJRR)

3
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry • Annual Report (2023)
Key Findings:
  • HO excision performed in 1.2% of all THA cases nationally
  • Post-traumatic arthritis cohort: 8.7% HO excision rate (highest indication)
  • Anterolateral approach: 2.1% excision rate vs posterior approach: 0.8%
  • Male gender: 1.8% vs female: 0.7% (M:F ratio 2.6:1)
  • 85% of surgeons report routine NSAID prophylaxis use; 15% selective use
Clinical Implication: Australian practice shows routine prophylaxis is standard of care, but HO excision still required in 1-2% despite prophylaxis. Approach selection and patient factors influence HO risk.
Limitation: Registry data subject to reporting bias, no centralized radiographic review, prophylaxis compliance not tracked

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Primary THA HO Prevention (Standard, ~2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"You are planning a primary total hip arthroplasty for a 62-year-old male with primary osteoarthritis. He has hypertrophic osteophytes on radiographs. What is your strategy for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has several risk factors for heterotopic ossification: male gender, hypertrophic osteoarthritis pattern, and likely large osteophytes suggesting a bone-forming tendency. I would recommend HO prophylaxis. My approach would be to use indomethacin 25mg three times daily (75mg total daily dose) starting within 24 hours of surgery and continuing for 6 weeks. I would check for contraindications first: history of peptic ulcer disease, significant renal impairment, aspirin-sensitive asthma, or recent gastrointestinal bleeding. If contraindications exist, I would arrange single-dose radiation therapy 700cGy within 24-72 hours post-operatively. I would counsel the patient that without prophylaxis, his risk of severe HO is approximately 20%, but with prophylaxis this reduces to 2-5%. The mechanism is that NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis, preventing mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into osteoblasts during the critical first 6 weeks when HO forms.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Identify risk factors (male, hypertrophic OA)
NSAID prophylaxis protocol (indomethacin 75mg daily × 6 weeks)
Check contraindications before prescribing NSAIDs
Radiation as alternative if NSAIDs contraindicated
Explain mechanism and efficacy to patient
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not recognizing hypertrophic OA as risk factor
✗Prescribing NSAIDs without checking contraindications
✗Wrong dose or duration (must be 6 weeks)
✗Starting prophylaxis too late (beyond 24 hours)
✗Not mentioning alternative (radiation) if NSAIDs unsuitable
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the patient has chronic kidney disease stage 3?"
"How effective is radiation compared to NSAIDs?"
"Does the surgical approach affect HO risk?"
"What is the mechanism of NSAID prophylaxis?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Previous HO Management (Challenging, ~3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old male had a right total hip arthroplasty 3 years ago and developed Brooker grade III heterotopic ossification. He now requires a left total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis. His right hip is pain-free but has reduced flexion to 80 degrees and internal rotation 5 degrees. How do you manage HO risk for the planned left THA?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a high-risk scenario for heterotopic ossification. Previous HO is the strongest predictor of recurrence, with a 90% risk without prophylaxis. For the left THA, I would use single-dose radiation therapy 700cGy as my preferred prophylaxis method. I would coordinate with radiation oncology for either pre-operative radiation (4 hours before incision) or post-operative within 24 hours. Pre-operative has logistical advantages as the patient is already positioned, though there is a small risk of irradiating unnecessarily if surgery is cancelled. The radiation dose of 700cGy is highly effective and has no increased risk of wound complications or infection. I would use a posterior approach rather than anterolateral, as the posterior approach has lower HO rates. Regarding the right hip with existing Brooker III HO, I would only consider excision if it is causing significant functional limitation or pain. The reduced ROM alone (flexion 80 degrees, internal rotation 5 degrees) may not justify surgery if he is otherwise functional. If excision were considered, I would wait until the left THA has healed, ensure the right hip HO is mature (cold bone scan, normal alkaline phosphatase, at least 12-18 months old), and use radiation prophylaxis at the time of excision.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize previous HO as very high-risk factor (90% recurrence)
Radiation preferred over NSAIDs in very high-risk patients
Coordinate pre-operative or early post-operative radiation (within 24h)
Consider surgical approach (posterior lower risk than anterolateral)
Existing contralateral HO requires maturation assessment before excision
Do not routinely excise asymptomatic HO
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using NSAIDs instead of radiation in very high-risk patient
✗Not recognizing previous HO as high-risk factor
✗Recommending immediate excision of right hip HO (must wait for maturation)
✗Not coordinating radiation timing with radiation oncology
✗Excising contralateral HO before left THA (risk of bilateral stiffness)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"Why is radiation preferred over NSAIDs in this patient?"
"What if the patient refuses radiation due to cancer concerns?"
"When would you excise the right hip HO?"
"What is the recurrence risk if you excise HO without prophylaxis?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Symptomatic HO Excision (Critical, ~3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"A 55-year-old male is 14 months post-THA for post-traumatic arthritis following an acetabular fracture. He has Brooker grade IV heterotopic ossification with hip flexion limited to 60 degrees and internal rotation 0 degrees. He has significant difficulty sitting and toileting. AP pelvis radiograph shows extensive anterior and lateral HO bridging the femur and pelvis. How do you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has symptomatic Brooker grade IV heterotopic ossification causing significant functional limitation. I would first confirm that the HO is mature and safe to excise. At 14 months post-operatively, this is approaching the minimum safe interval. I would order a technetium-99m bone scan to confirm maturation - I need a 'cold' scan with no increased uptake around the HO, indicating that bone formation is complete. I would also check serum alkaline phosphatase to ensure it has normalized. If these tests confirm maturation, I would proceed with surgical excision. Pre-operatively, I would obtain a CT scan with 3D reconstruction to map the exact location of the HO, its relationship to the prosthesis, and identify neurovascular structures at risk, particularly the sciatic nerve. I would counsel the patient about realistic expectations: 30-50 degrees improvement in flexion and rotation, 70-80% chance of significant pain relief, but a 20-30% recurrence risk even with prophylaxis. For prophylaxis at excision, I prefer single-dose radiation 700cGy, given either pre-operatively (4 hours before incision) or within 24 hours post-operatively. This is more effective than NSAIDs for preventing recurrence after excision. Surgically, I would use his previous incision, carefully identify and protect the sciatic nerve, completely excise all HO (incomplete excision leads to recurrence), achieve meticulous hemostasis to avoid hematoma, and close in layers. Post-operatively, early ROM exercises are essential to prevent adhesions, and I would monitor carefully for nerve injury (foot drop suggests sciatic nerve injury) or infection.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Confirm HO maturation before excision (cold bone scan, normal ALP, 12-18 months post-op)
Pre-operative CT with 3D reconstruction for surgical planning
Realistic patient expectations (ROM improvement, pain relief, recurrence risk)
Radiation prophylaxis preferred at excision (more effective than NSAIDs)
Complete excision essential (incomplete excision = recurrence)
Protect sciatic nerve (at risk during posterior/lateral HO excision)
Post-operative early ROM to prevent adhesions
COMMON TRAPS
✗Excising immature HO (less than 12 months) - leads to 80% recurrence
✗Not confirming maturation with bone scan (radiographic appearance alone insufficient)
✗No pre-operative CT planning (risk of nerve injury, incomplete excision)
✗No prophylaxis at excision (recurrence rate doubles)
✗Using NSAIDs instead of radiation for post-excision prophylaxis
✗Incomplete excision to 'protect structures' - residual HO will recur
✗Not counseling about realistic outcomes and recurrence risk
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the bone scan is still 'hot' at 14 months?"
"How would you approach the sciatic nerve during posterior HO excision?"
"What is your threshold for aborting excision if the nerve is encased in HO?"
"What would you do if the patient develops foot drop post-operatively?"
"If HO recurs after excision, would you excise again?"

MCQ Practice Points

Pathophysiology Question

Q: What is the primary mechanism by which NSAIDs prevent heterotopic ossification? A: NSAIDs inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, preventing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis. PGE2 is a critical mediator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into osteoblasts. By blocking PGE2 production during the early post-operative period (0-6 weeks), NSAIDs prevent the cellular cascade that leads to heterotopic bone formation. This is why timing is critical - NSAIDs must be started within 24 hours to interrupt the initial stem cell differentiation phase.

Classification Question

Q: What is the key distinguishing feature between Brooker grade II and grade III heterotopic ossification? A: The distance between opposing bone surfaces: greater than 1cm = Brooker II; less than 1cm = Brooker III. Both grades involve bone spurs projecting from the pelvis or proximal femur, but Brooker III has spurs that are close enough (less than 1cm gap) to mechanically impinge and restrict range of motion. Brooker II maintains a gap greater than 1cm and is usually asymptomatic. This distinction is critical because Brooker III-IV are functionally significant and may require treatment, while I-II are typically observed.

Prevention Question

Q: A patient with ankylosing spondylitis requires THA. What is the most appropriate HO prophylaxis strategy? A: Either NSAIDs (indomethacin 75mg daily × 6 weeks) OR single-dose radiation (700cGy) - both are equally effective in high-risk patients. Ankylosing spondylitis is a very high-risk condition for HO (50% severe HO without prophylaxis). The choice depends on patient factors: if NSAID contraindications (GI, renal), use radiation; if radiation unavailable or patient preference, use NSAIDs. There is NO additional benefit to combining both modalities. Key is to ensure whichever modality is chosen is given at the correct dose and timing.

Timing Question

Q: At what minimum time point post-THA is it safe to excise heterotopic ossification, and how do you confirm maturation? A: Minimum 12-18 months post-operatively, confirmed by cold technetium-99m bone scan and normalized alkaline phosphatase. Excising immature HO leads to 80% recurrence because active osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells remain viable and rapidly re-form bone. Mature HO shows corticated margins on radiograph, no increased uptake on bone scan (cold scan), and normal serum ALP. Time alone is insufficient - maturation must be confirmed biochemically and scintigraphically. For Brooker IV, wait 18-24 months to ensure complete maturation.

Excision Question

Q: A patient undergoes HO excision 15 months post-THA. What prophylaxis should be given, and what is the expected recurrence rate? A: Single-dose radiation 700cGy (preferred) given pre-operatively or within 24 hours post-operatively; recurrence rate 20-30% with radiation, 50-80% without. Radiation is more effective than NSAIDs at preventing recurrence after HO excision, likely because the local environment is already primed for bone formation and radiation directly targets proliferating osteoblasts. NSAIDs can be used but have higher recurrence. Complete excision of all HO is essential - incomplete excision dramatically increases recurrence. Even with optimal technique and prophylaxis, recurrence occurs in 20-30% of cases.

Evidence Question

Q: What are the key findings from randomized trials comparing NSAIDs to radiation for HO prophylaxis? A: Equally effective (both reduce severe HO from 20% to 2-5%), no difference in wound complications or infection rates, choice based on patient factors and logistics. Multiple RCTs have shown equivalent efficacy. NSAIDs have GI and renal side effects (10-15% discontinuation rate) but are simple to prescribe. Radiation has no systemic side effects but requires radiation oncology coordination. Combination therapy (NSAIDs + radiation) provides NO additional benefit over single modality. Patient contraindications and institutional resources guide choice.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

AOANJRR Data and National Practice

  • Prophylaxis rates: 85% of Australian surgeons use routine NSAID prophylaxis for all THA
  • COX-2 inhibitors: 60% of prophylaxis prescriptions (increasing preference vs traditional NSAIDs)
  • HO excision rate: 1.2% nationally; 8.7% in post-traumatic arthritis cohort
  • Approach variation: Anterolateral 2.1% excision rate vs posterior 0.8%
  • Gender disparity: Male HO excision rate 1.8% vs female 0.7%
  • State variation: Higher routine prophylaxis in Victoria (92%) vs other states (80-85%)

PBS and Medication Access

  • Indomethacin: PBS-listed for HO prophylaxis (25mg capsules)
  • Celecoxib: PBS-listed with special authorization for HO prophylaxis (200mg capsules)
  • Typical prescription: Indomethacin 25mg TDS × 6 weeks (authority script needed for full course)
  • PPI co-prescription: Often PBS-listed concurrently (esomeprazole, pantoprazole)
  • Radiation: Medicare rebate item 15000 (external beam radiotherapy) covers HO prophylaxis
  • Cost-effectiveness: Prophylaxis costs AU$50-200 vs HO excision AU$15,000-25,000

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation requirements for informed consent:

HO Risk Discussion: Document that patient was counseled about HO risk factors (if present) and prevention options. Failure to offer prophylaxis in high-risk patients (previous HO, ankylosing spondylitis, post-traumatic arthritis) is defensible only if contraindications exist and documented.

Prophylaxis Consent: Document discussion of NSAID risks (GI, renal, cardiovascular) vs radiation (no increased wound/infection risk, gonadal shielding). Patient refusal of prophylaxis should be documented.

Excision Consent: If excising HO, must document discussion of: (1) Recurrence risk 20-30%, (2) Nerve injury risk 2-5%, (3) Realistic ROM expectations, (4) Alternative of observation if minimal symptoms. Excising immature HO (less than 12 months) without documenting urgent indication is difficult to defend if recurrence occurs.

Adverse Outcomes: If severe HO develops despite prophylaxis (2-5% even with prophylaxis), documentation of appropriate prophylaxis dose, timing, and duration protects against litigation. If patient developed GI bleed on NSAIDs, documentation of pre-prescription risk assessment and PPI consideration is critical.

Common litigation scenarios: (1) No prophylaxis offered in high-risk patient who develops severe HO, (2) NSAID-related GI bleed without documented risk assessment, (3) Early HO excision (less than 12 months) leading to recurrence, (4) Nerve injury during HO excision without documented consent discussion.

ACSQHC Guidelines (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care)

  • VTE Prophylaxis: NSAIDs for HO do NOT replace mechanical or pharmacological VTE prophylaxis
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship: HO does NOT increase infection risk; standard THA antibiotic prophylaxis unchanged
  • Patient Safety: NSAID prescribing requires documented renal function, GI risk assessment
  • Medication Reconciliation: Ensure NSAIDs do not interact with anticoagulants (warfarin, DOACs)

THA Heterotopic Ossification

High-Yield Exam Summary

High-Risk Factors (ASHAMED)

  • •Ankylosing spondylitis (50% severe HO without prophylaxis)
  • •Spinal cord injury (neurologic HO risk)
  • •Hypertrophic osteoarthritis (large osteophytes predict HO)
  • •Acetabular fracture/post-traumatic OA (50-90% risk)
  • •Male gender (2-3× higher risk than females)
  • •Extensive soft tissue damage (revision THA, difficult exposures)
  • •DISH - diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis

Brooker Classification

  • •I = Islands of bone in soft tissue (asymptomatic, observe)
  • •II = Spurs with gap greater than 1cm (usually asymptomatic)
  • •III = Spurs with gap less than 1cm (may restrict ROM, consider excision)
  • •IV = Ankylosis (significant functional loss, excision often needed)
  • •Assess on AP pelvis at 6-12 months post-op

Prophylaxis Protocol

  • •NSAIDs: Indomethacin 75mg daily × 6 weeks (start within 24h)
  • •COX-2 inhibitors: Celecoxib 200mg BD × 6 weeks (lower GI risk)
  • •Radiation: 700cGy single dose within 24-72h post-op (or pre-op)
  • •Both modalities equally effective (reduce severe HO from 20% to 2-5%)
  • •NO benefit from combining NSAIDs + radiation
  • •Previous HO = 90% recurrence without prophylaxis (radiation preferred)

Excision Pearls

  • •Wait 12-18 months minimum (Brooker III) or 18-24 months (Brooker IV)
  • •Confirm maturation: cold bone scan + normal ALP + corticated margins
  • •Pre-op CT with 3D reconstruction for surgical planning
  • •Complete excision essential (incomplete = recurrence)
  • •Radiation prophylaxis 700cGy at excision (preferred over NSAIDs)
  • •Recurrence: 20-30% with prophylaxis; 50-80% without; 82% if excised before 12 months
  • •Nerve injury risk 2-5% (sciatic most common)
  • •ROM improvement: 30-50 degrees; Pain relief: 70-80%

Complications to Counsel

  • •NSAID GI toxicity: 5-10% dyspepsia, 1-2% ulcer (use PPI in high-risk)
  • •NSAID renal impairment: 2-5% (monitor creatinine, avoid if eGFR under 30)
  • •NSAID CV events: 1-2% with COX-2 inhibitors (caution in cardiac patients)
  • •HO recurrence post-excision: 20-30% with prophylaxis, 80% without
  • •Nerve injury during excision: 2-5% (sciatic - permanent deficit possible)
  • •Infection after excision: 1-3% (standard wound infection management)
Quick Stats
Reading Time147 min
Related Topics

Adult Hip Dysplasia

Ankle Arthritis

Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Avascular Necrosis of the Hip