Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Thumb Hypoplasia

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Thumb Hypoplasia

Comprehensive guide to thumb hypoplasia including Blauth classification, associated syndromes, clinical assessment, reconstruction versus pollicization, and surgical management for Orthopaedic examination.

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

Thumb Hypoplasia

Congenital Underdevelopment of the Thumb

1/100,000 live birthsIncidence
Pollicization requiredType IIIB-V
60-70% of casesAssociated syndromes
12-18 months optimalSurgery

Blauth Classification

Type I
PatternMinor generalized hypoplasia, stable.
TreatmentAugmentation/opponensplasty
Type II
PatternAbsent thenar muscles, narrow web, stable UCL.
TreatmentOpponensplasty, UCL reconstruction, web deepening
Type IIIA
PatternExtrinsic muscle deficiency, stable CMC joint.
TreatmentControversial - reconstruction vs pollicization
Type IIIB
PatternUNSTABLE CMC joint (partial metacarpal).
TreatmentPollicization
Type IV
PatternPouce flottant (floating thumb) - proximal phalanx only.
TreatmentPollicization
Type V
PatternComplete absence (aplasia).
TreatmentPollicization

Critical Must-Knows

  • Blauth Classification: Types I-V based on thumb development (I mild to V absent).
  • Type IIIB or Higher: Absolute indication for pollicization (unstable CMC joint).
  • TAR Syndrome: Thrombocytopenia-Absent Radius - thumbs are PRESENT (vs radial club hand).
  • Fanconi Anemia: Must screen with chromosome breakage test - bone marrow failure risk.
  • Pollicization: Transfer index finger to thumb position - Buck-Gramcko technique gold standard.

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Blauth IIIB = pollicization (unstable CMC)
  • "
    TAR = thumbs present, radii absent
  • "
    Screen for Fanconi with chromosome breakage
  • "
    Pollicization at 12-18 months optimal
  • "
    Four-flap Z-plasty for web space deepening

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Anteroposterior X-ray showing the complete absence ofthe radius with the presence of the thumb.
Click to expand
Anteroposterior X-ray showing the complete absence ofthe radius with the presence of the thumb.Credit: Elmakky A et al. via Curr. Genomics via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Three-year-old girl with bilateral ulnar deficiencies and a left hypoplastic thumb with a bifid metacarpal (Courtesy of Shriners Hospital for Children, Philadelphia).
Click to expand
Three-year-old girl with bilateral ulnar deficiencies and a left hypoplastic thumb with a bifid metacarpal (Courtesy of Shriners Hospital for ChildrenCredit: Kozin SH et al. via Clin Orthop Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Three-year-old with ulnar deficiency depicted in Fig. 25 (Courtesy of Shriners Hospital for Children, Philadelphia). (A) Left thumb position. (B) Gross grasp pattern. (C) Fine pinch pattern.
Click to expand
Three-year-old with ulnar deficiency depicted in Fig. 25 (Courtesy of Shriners Hospital for Children, Philadelphia). (A) Left thumb position. (B) GrosCredit: Kozin SH et al. via Clin Orthop Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Clinical photograph of a patient with Holt-Oram syndromewith right non opposable triphalangeal thumb and left thumbaplasia treated by index finger pollicization.
Click to expand
Clinical photograph of a patient with Holt-Oram syndromewith right non opposable triphalangeal thumb and left thumbaplasia treated by index finger polCredit: Elmakky A et al. via Curr. Genomics via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Exam Points - KNOW THESE

Pollicization Indications

Absolute: Blauth IIIB, IV, V (unstable or absent CMC joint). IIIA is controversial - depends on stability, thenar function, patient/family preference. If CMC unstable or thenar absent with poor grip, pollicize.

TAR vs Radial Club Hand

TAR Syndrome: Thrombocytopenia + Absent Radius, but thumbs are PRESENT. Check platelets before surgery. Radial Club Hand: Radius absent AND thumb hypoplastic/absent.

Fanconi Anemia Screening

Must perform chromosome breakage test (DEB or MMC) for all radial dysplasia cases. Fanconi patients develop bone marrow failure, leukemia, and solid tumors - requires hematology follow-up.

Pollicization Timing

Optimal: 12-18 months (before pinch development). Acceptable: 6 months to 3 years. Earlier surgery preserves cortical reorganization. Late pollicization (older than 5 years) has poorer outcomes.

At a Glance

Thumb hypoplasia is congenital underdevelopment ranging from mild hypoplasia to complete aplasia. The Blauth classification (I-V) guides treatment: Types I-II are reconstructable (opponensplasty, web deepening); Type IIIA is controversial; Types IIIB-V require pollicization (index-to-thumb transfer). The key decision point is CMC joint stability - if unstable or absent, pollicization is indicated. Often associated with syndromes: TAR syndrome (thrombocytopenia + absent radius, but thumbs PRESENT), Fanconi anemia (screen with chromosome breakage test), VACTERL, and Holt-Oram. Surgery at 12-18 months optimizes cortical reorganization and functional outcomes.

Thumb Hypoplasia Treatment by Blauth Type

Blauth TypeKey FeaturesCMC JointThenar MusclesTreatment
Minor generalized hypoplasiaStablePresent but weakOpponensplasty +/- augmentation
Absent thenar, narrow webStableAbsentOpponensplasty + web deepening + UCL reconstruction
Extrinsic deficiency, stable CMCStableAbsentCONTROVERSIAL - reconstruction vs pollicization
Unstable CMC, partial MCUNSTABLEAbsentPOLLICIZATION
Pouce flottant - proximal phalanx onlyAbsentAbsentPOLLICIZATION
Complete absence (aplasia)AbsentAbsentPOLLICIZATION
Mnemonic

BLAUTH Classification Memory

B
Build it up
Type I-II: Reconstruction possible
L
Ligaments
Type IIIA: CMC stable
A
Absent stability
Type IIIB: UNSTABLE CMC = pollicization
U
Useless floating
Type IV: Pouce flottant
T
Totally absent
Type V: Aplasia
H
Hand swap
Types IIIB-V need pollicization

Memory Hook:BLAUTH: Build up I-II, Ligaments stable in IIIA, Absent stability IIIB-V needs Hand swap (pollicization)

Mnemonic

POLLICIZATION Surgical Steps

P
Position
Abduct and pronate index 140-160 degrees
O
Osteotomy
Metacarpal neck wedge osteotomy
L
Ligaments
Preserve collaterals at MP joint
L
Lengthen
EDC, EIP tendons for EPL/EPB
I
Intrinsics
First DI becomes thenar (APB/FPB)
C
Collateral
Radial collateral at MP becomes UCL
I
Index artery
Preserve radial digital artery
Z
Z-plasty
Four-flap for web space deepening
A
Alignment
Nail faces radially
T
Tenodesis
EDC slack, FDP/FDI tight

Memory Hook:POLLICIZATION steps: Position, Osteotomy, preserve Ligaments, Lengthen extensors, Intrinsics reposition, Collaterals preserve, Index artery preserve, Z-plasty web, Alignment correct, Tenodesis balance

Mnemonic

TAR Syndrome Recognition

T
Thrombocytopenia
Low platelets - check CBC
A
Absent Radius
Radial dysplasia present
R
Retained thumbs
THUMBS PRESENT (key differentiator)

Memory Hook:TAR = Thrombocytopenia + Absent Radius + Retained thumbs (this distinguishes from radial club hand)

Overview and Epidemiology

Thumb hypoplasia is congenital underdevelopment of the thumb, ranging from mild hypoplasia to complete absence (aplasia). It represents a spectrum of deficiency affecting bones, joints, muscles, tendons, nerves, and vessels.

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: Approximately 1 per 100,000 live births
  • Bilateral: 60% of cases are bilateral
  • Associated Syndromes: 60-70% have associated anomalies
  • Gender: Equal male-to-female ratio
  • Inheritance: Usually sporadic, occasionally autosomal dominant

Associated Conditions

Radial Longitudinal Deficiency

  • Often part of radial dysplasia spectrum
  • Can range from hypoplastic radius to complete radial aplasia
  • Radial club hand deformity common

Thrombocytopenia-Absent Radius (TAR) Syndrome

  • Thrombocytopenia with bilateral absent radii
  • KEY FEATURE: Thumbs are PRESENT (differentiates from radial club hand)
  • Must check platelet count before any surgery
  • Autosomal recessive inheritance

Fanconi Anemia

  • Progressive bone marrow failure
  • Increased cancer risk (leukemia, solid tumors)
  • MUST screen with chromosome breakage test (DEB or MMC test)
  • Radial dysplasia with thumb hypoplasia
  • Short stature, café-au-lait spots, renal anomalies

VACTERL Association

  • Vertebral anomalies
  • Anal atresia
  • Cardiac defects
  • Tracheo-Esophageal fistula
  • Renal anomalies
  • Limb defects (radial ray including thumb)

Holt-Oram Syndrome

  • Cardiac septal defects (ASD, VSD)
  • Upper limb radial ray deficiency
  • Autosomal dominant (TBX5 gene mutation)

Other Associations

  • Diamond-Blackfan anemia
  • Aase syndrome
  • Nager syndrome
  • Maternal diabetes

Embryology

  • Develops during limb bud formation at 4-8 weeks gestation
  • Radial ray formation controlled by AER (Apical Ectodermal Ridge) and ZPA (Zone of Polarizing Activity)
  • Disruption of FGF and Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathways
  • Results in spectrum from mild hypoplasia to complete absence

Blauth Classification System

The Blauth classification (Types I-V) is the gold standard for categorizing thumb hypoplasia severity and guiding treatment. It is based on degree of skeletal and soft tissue development.

Type I: Minor Generalized Hypoplasia

Features:

  • All structures present but smaller than normal
  • Stable CMC and MP joints
  • Thenar muscles present but hypoplastic
  • First web space adequate

Treatment:

  • Opponensplasty (if thenar weak)
  • Thumb augmentation procedures
  • Conservative management often acceptable

Type II: Absence of Intrinsic Thenar Muscles

Features:

  • Thenar muscles absent (APB, FPB, OP)
  • First web space narrowed (adduction contracture)
  • Ulnar collateral ligament of MP joint lax/absent
  • CMC joint stable
  • Extrinsic muscles (FPL, EPL) present

Treatment:

  • Opponensplasty (FDS, ADM, or ECRL transfer)
  • First web space deepening (four-flap Z-plasty)
  • UCL reconstruction at MP joint (if unstable)
  • Consider skeletal augmentation if severely hypoplastic

Type III: Extrinsic Muscle and Thenar Muscle Deficiency

DIVIDED INTO IIIA AND IIIB - critical distinction for treatment:

Type IIIA: Stable CMC Joint

  • Extrinsic tendons (FPL, EPL) absent or hypoplastic
  • Thenar muscles absent
  • Metacarpal present and CMC joint stable
  • First web space severely narrowed

Treatment: CONTROVERSIAL

  • Reconstruction option: Opponensplasty, web deepening, tendon transfers, possible metacarpal lengthening
  • Pollicization option: More predictable functional outcome
  • Decision based on: CMC stability, metacarpal quality, family preference, surgeon experience

Type IIIB: Unstable CMC Joint

  • Partial/hypoplastic metacarpal
  • CMC joint unstable or subluxated
  • Extrinsic and intrinsic muscles absent/severely deficient

Treatment: POLLICIZATION (absolute indication)

Type IV: Pouce Flottant (Floating Thumb)

Features:

  • Only rudimentary proximal phalanx present (floating on soft tissue)
  • No metacarpal or minimal nubbin
  • No functional muscles
  • Attached by narrow skin bridge

Treatment:

  • Pollicization (absolute indication)
  • May ablate rudimentary thumb before pollicization

Type V: Absence (Aplasia)

Features:

  • Complete absence of thumb
  • No skeletal or muscular structures

Treatment:

  • Pollicization (absolute indication)

Anatomy

Normal Thumb Anatomy

Skeletal Elements:

  • First metacarpal (shorter, wider than digital metacarpals)
  • Trapezium-MC1 joint (CMC - saddle joint for opposition)
  • MP joint (condylar with sesamoids)
  • IP joint (hinge joint)
  • Proximal and distal phalanges

Critical Feature: CMC saddle joint allows opposition movement

Intrinsic Muscles (Thenar)

Thenar Eminence:

  • APB (Abductor pollicis brevis): Abduction, median nerve
  • FPB (Flexor pollicis brevis): Flexion at MP, median/ulnar
  • OP (Opponens pollicis): Opposition, median nerve
  • AdP (Adductor pollicis): Adduction, ulnar nerve

Type II hypoplasia: Thenar muscles absent

Extrinsic Tendons

Extrinsic Function:

  • FPL: Flexion of IP joint (AIN branch of median)
  • EPL: Extension of IP joint (PIN branch of radial)
  • EPB: Extension of MP joint (PIN)
  • APL: Abduction at CMC (PIN)

Type III hypoplasia: Extrinsics absent/hypoplastic

Blood Supply

Vascular Anatomy:

  • Princeps pollicis artery (from radial artery)
  • Digital arteries to both sides
  • Dorsal network from first dorsal metacarpal artery

Pollicization: Radial digital artery of index becomes dominant

Classification

Blauth Classification Summary

Blauth Types at a Glance

TypeKey FeatureCMC JointTreatment
IMinor generalized hypoplasiaStableOpponensplasty if weak
IIAbsent thenar, narrow webStableOpponensplasty + web deepening
IIIAAbsent extrinsics, stable CMCSTABLEControversial - reconstruct vs pollicize
IIIBAbsent extrinsics, unstable CMCUNSTABLEPollicization (absolute)
IVPouce flottant (floating)AbsentPollicization (absolute)
VComplete aplasiaAbsentPollicization (absolute)

Key Decision: CMC stability determines IIIA vs IIIB and treatment approach

Modified Manske-McCarroll Classification

Manske and McCarroll modified Blauth's original classification to emphasize the IIIA/IIIB distinction:

Type IIIA (Stable CMC):

  • Reconstruction may be attempted
  • Multiple staged procedures
  • Variable outcomes

Type IIIB (Unstable CMC):

  • Absolute indication for pollicization
  • Reconstruction yields poor results
  • Better functional outcomes with index transfer

Current Evidence: Trend favors pollicization for Type IIIA with absent FPL

Clinical Assessment

History

Birth and Developmental History

  • Maternal diabetes, teratogen exposure
  • Developmental milestones
  • Hand dominance (if old enough)

Family History

  • Similar anomalies in family members
  • Autosomal dominant inheritance patterns

Functional Assessment

  • Current hand use and grip patterns
  • Activities of daily living affected
  • Pinch function

Systemic Review

  • Cardiac symptoms (Holt-Oram)
  • GI issues (VACTERL)
  • Hematologic symptoms - bruising, petechiae (TAR, Fanconi)
  • Renal issues

Physical Examination

General Inspection

  • Bilateral assessment (60% bilateral)
  • Overall hand size and proportions
  • Forearm - assess for radial club hand deformity
  • Elbow - assess for radial head dislocation

Thumb Examination

  • Size: Length and width compared to contralateral
  • First web space: Depth and width (adduction contracture)
  • CMC joint: Stability testing - critical for Blauth classification
  • MP joint: Stability, UCL integrity
  • IP joint: Presence, stability

Muscle Assessment

  • Thenar bulk: APB, FPB, opponens pollicis (Type II has absent thenar)
  • Opposition: Ability to oppose thumb to small finger
  • FPL function: Active IP flexion
  • EPL function: Active IP/MP extension

Vascular Examination

  • Capillary refill in thumb
  • Allen test (assess radial/ulnar artery dominance)
  • Digital artery presence (critical for pollicization planning)

Neurologic Examination

  • Median nerve sensation
  • Two-point discrimination

Associated Findings

  • Radial dysplasia/club hand
  • Syndactyly
  • Polydactyly
  • Other limb anomalies

Special Tests

CMC Joint Stability (Critical for IIIA vs IIIB)

  • Stress testing of CMC joint
  • Assess for subluxation/dislocation
  • Fluoroscopy if uncertain

Pinch Force Measurement

  • Compared to contralateral side
  • Functional assessment

Investigations

Imaging

Radiographs (AP and Lateral)

  • Thumb bones: Assess metacarpal, phalanges
  • CMC joint: Evaluate stability, articular surfaces
  • Carpal bones: Scaphoid, trapezium development
  • Radius: Assess for radial dysplasia
  • Forearm: Radial length, radial head dislocation

MRI (Selected Cases)

  • Assessment of thenar and extrinsic muscles
  • CMC joint cartilage and stability
  • Vascular anatomy for pollicization planning

Ultrasound

  • Vascular mapping (radial digital artery of index)
  • Thenar muscle bulk assessment

Laboratory Investigations (Rule Out Syndromes)

Complete Blood Count

  • Platelets: Rule out TAR syndrome (thrombocytopenia)
  • Hemoglobin: Assess for Fanconi, Diamond-Blackfan anemia

Chromosome Breakage Test

  • DEB (diepoxybutane) or MMC (mitomycin C) test
  • MANDATORY for all radial dysplasia cases to rule out Fanconi anemia
  • Fanconi cells show increased chromosomal breaks with exposure

Genetic Testing

  • TBX5 gene (Holt-Oram syndrome)
  • RBM8A/FAAP gene (TAR syndrome)
  • Fanconi gene panel (FANC genes)

Other Investigations

Echocardiography

  • Rule out cardiac defects (Holt-Oram, VACTERL)
  • Especially if murmur present

Renal Ultrasound

  • Assess for renal anomalies (VACTERL, Fanconi)

Spine Radiographs

  • Vertebral anomalies (VACTERL)

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
thumb hypoplasia management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for thumb hypoplasiaCredit: OrthoVellum

Treatment decision based on Blauth classification, CMC stability, and functional requirements.

Conservative Management

Observation Only

  • Mild Type I with good function
  • Bilateral cases where pollicization timing differs

Adaptive Strategies

  • Occupational therapy
  • Adaptive equipment for ADLs
  • Side-to-side pinch patterns

Surgical Management Overview

Reconstruction Indications (Types I, II, IIIA)

  • CMC joint stable
  • Metacarpal present with reasonable quality
  • Family preference for maintaining thumb appearance

Pollicization Indications (Types IIIB, IV, V)

  • ABSOLUTE: Blauth IIIB (unstable CMC), IV (pouce flottant), V (aplasia)
  • RELATIVE: Blauth IIIA with poor metacarpal quality, absent extrinsics, family preference

Surgical Timing

Optimal Window: 12-18 months

  • Rationale: Before development of cortical representation for pinch (occurs around 18-24 months)
  • Brain plasticity allows cortical reorganization - index finger cortical area becomes thumb area
  • Early enough to not delay hand function development

Acceptable Range: 6 months to 3 years

  • Earlier (6-12 months): Smaller structures, technically demanding
  • Later (greater than 3 years): Poorer outcomes, less cortical plasticity

Late Pollicization (older than 5 years)

  • Less optimal outcomes
  • Poor cortical reorganization
  • Consider if diagnosis delayed or family previously declined

Surgical Techniques

Opponensplasty for Types I-II

Indications:

  • Absent or weak thenar muscles
  • Stable CMC joint
  • Adequate thumb skeletal structure

Opponensplasty Options:

1. FDS Ring Finger Transfer (Most Common)

  • FDS ring finger harvested at A1 pulley
  • Passed around ulnar border of hand
  • Attached to APB insertion (radial base of proximal phalanx)
  • Provides opposition vector

2. ADM Transfer (Huber Transfer)

  • Abductor digiti minimi transferred to thumb
  • Neurovascular pedicle preserved
  • Good for opposition and first web abduction

3. ECRL Transfer

  • Used when FDS or ADM not suitable
  • Routed through interosseous membrane or around FCU
  • Attached to APB insertion

Technique (FDS Opponensplasty):

  1. Harvest FDS ring finger at A1 pulley (preserve A2)
  2. Pass through window at ulnar wrist (volar to FCU)
  3. Subcutaneous tunnel to thumb
  4. Attach to radial base of proximal phalanx at APB insertion
  5. Tension: Thumb in full opposition with wrist neutral

First Web Deepening

Indications:

  • Narrow first web space (adduction contracture)
  • Types II and III

Four-Flap Z-Plasty Technique:

  1. Design two opposing Z-plasties on dorsal and volar surfaces
  2. 60-degree angles for maximum lengthening
  3. Raise full-thickness skin flaps
  4. Transpose flaps to deepen web
  5. May need skin graft for closure if severe contracture

Alternative: Dorsal Rotation Flap

  • Large dorsal flap rotated into web space
  • Skin graft to donor site

UCL Reconstruction (Type II)

Indication: Lax or absent UCL at MP joint

Technique:

  1. Harvest palmaris longus or plantaris tendon
  2. Bone tunnels in proximal phalanx and metacarpal
  3. Weave graft in figure-of-8 pattern
  4. Tension with thumb in slight radial deviation

Thumb Augmentation

Indications:

  • Hypoplastic metacarpal or proximal phalanx (Types I-II)

Options:

  • Bone grafting to metacarpal
  • Distraction lengthening (rarely used)
  • On-top plasty (transfer of great toe to thumb) - for older patients with late presentation

This completes the reconstruction techniques section.

Pollicization: Index Finger to Thumb Transfer

Gold standard for Blauth IIIB, IV, V

The Buck-Gramcko pollicization technique is the most widely used method for transferring the index finger to the thumb position.

Preoperative Planning

Assessment:

  • Confirm index finger normal (length, joints, motion, neurovascular status)
  • Vascular dominance - ensure index has adequate radial digital artery
  • Plan skin incisions to preserve web space creation

Goals of Pollicization:

  1. Create functional thumb with opposition and pinch
  2. Position new thumb at appropriate length (shorter than pre-op index)
  3. Adequate first web space for grasp
  4. Preserve neurovascular structures
  5. Balance motor function (extension vs flexion)

Surgical Approach and Technique

Patient Positioning:

  • Supine, arm on hand table
  • Tourniquet on upper arm
  • Loupe magnification recommended

Skin Incision (Four-Flap Design):

  1. Dorsal flap: Racquet incision over index metacarpal extending to dorsal web space
  2. Volar flap: From midaxial line of index, around web, to midaxial line of middle finger
  3. Two triangular flaps: Create new first web space
  4. Design allows Z-plasty for web space deepening

Step 1: Index Ray Dissection

  1. Identify and preserve neurovascular bundles (radial and ulnar digital arteries/nerves of index)
  2. Dissect index metacarpal circumferentially
  3. Divide deep transverse metacarpal ligament between index and middle fingers
  4. Preserve radial digital artery of index (critical) - this becomes thumb's dominant vessel
  5. Ligate ulnar digital artery of index if needed for mobilization

Step 2: Tendon Preparation

  • FDP to index: Maintained as FPL (thumb flexor)
  • FDS to index: Usually absent in hypoplastic hands, maintain if present
  • EDC and EIP: Used for EPL/EPB function
    • EDC to index becomes EPL
    • EIP becomes EPB (or both combined)
  • Intrinsic muscles:
    • First dorsal interosseous becomes thenar muscle (APB/FPB equivalent)
    • First palmar interosseous preserved or divided

Step 3: Metacarpal Osteotomy and Positioning

KEY STEP: Metacarpal neck wedge osteotomy

  1. Perform closing wedge osteotomy at metacarpal neck
  2. Removes 20-30 degrees of wedge
  3. Allows pronation of new thumb (nail faces radially)
  4. K-wire fixation of osteotomy

Positioning Parameters:

  • Abduction: 140-160 degrees from middle finger axis
  • Pronation: 120-140 degrees (nail faces radially, not dorsally)
  • Flexion: Slight palmar flexion
  • Length: Shortened - tip should reach middle of proximal phalanx of long finger
  • Opposition: New thumb pulp should easily touch small finger

Step 4: Ligament and Joint Work

  1. Preserve collateral ligaments at MP joint (former index MP becomes new thumb MP)
  2. Radial collateral of index MP becomes UCL of thumb MP (critical for stability)
  3. IP joint of index becomes IP joint of new thumb (preserve stability)

Step 5: Web Space Creation

  • Transpose four flaps for deep first web space
  • Z-plasty technique for maximum depth
  • Ensure web reaches level of new thumb MP joint

Step 6: Tendon Balancing

  • Extensors: EDC and EIP adjusted for appropriate tension
    • Should allow full passive flexion
    • Slight extension tenodesis acceptable
  • Flexors: FDP tightened to provide strong flexion
  • Intrinsic (first DI): Positioned to provide thenar bulk and opposition force
    • Sutured to radial side of proximal phalanx

Step 7: Skin Closure

  • Four-flap closure for web space
  • Avoid tension on neurovascular pedicles
  • Ensure no kinking of vessels with thumb in opposition

Step 8: Immobilization

  • Long arm thumb spica cast
  • Thumb in opposition and slight abduction
  • Elbow at 90 degrees

Postoperative Care

Immobilization:

  • Cast for 4-6 weeks
  • Remove K-wires at 4-6 weeks

Therapy:

  • Gentle passive ROM at 6 weeks
  • Active ROM at 8 weeks
  • Strengthening at 3 months
  • Children typically regain function spontaneously with play

Monitoring:

  • Vascular status (especially first 48 hours)
  • Web space contracture (may need revision Z-plasty)
  • Growth of new thumb

This completes the pollicization technique description.

Reconstruction Complications

Opponensplasty Complications:

  • Under-tensioning: Weak opposition, inadequate thumb abduction
  • Over-tensioning: MP joint hyperextension, swan-neck deformity
  • Tendon adhesions: Limited excursion, poor function
  • Loss of ring finger flexion: If FDS harvest affects FDP function

Web Space Deepening:

  • Contracture recurrence: 10-20% require revision
  • Skin graft loss: If used for closure
  • Scar contracture: Hypertrophic scarring in web space

UCL Reconstruction:

  • Persistent instability: Graft failure, poor fixation
  • Stiffness: MP joint capsular contracture

Pollicization Complications

Early Complications:

Vascular Compromise (MOST SERIOUS)

  • Incidence: Less than 1% if radial digital artery preserved
  • Arterial insufficiency or venous congestion
  • Causes: Tension on pedicle, kinking, hematoma compression
  • Management: Immediate re-exploration, release constriction, ensure no tension

Nerve Injury

  • Stretch injury to digital nerves
  • Usually neuropraxia, recovers with time
  • Prevention: Gentle handling, no tension during closure

Wound Problems

  • Skin necrosis (especially at web apex)
  • Infection
  • Hematoma

Late Complications:

Malposition (5-10%)

  • Excessive or inadequate abduction
  • Excessive or inadequate pronation (nail rotation)
  • Correction may require revision osteotomy

Web Space Contracture (10-15%)

  • First web narrows with growth
  • Limits span and grasp
  • Treatment: Revision Z-plasty, skin grafting

Joint Instability

  • MP or IP joint instability if collaterals injured
  • May require ligament reconstruction

Tendon Imbalance

  • Extensor lag (if EDC too loose)
  • Flexion contracture (if FDP too tight)
  • Revision tendon balancing may be needed

Growth Disturbance

  • New thumb grows proportionally with hand
  • May become relatively shorter with growth (metacarpal physis removed)
  • Usually not functionally significant

Stiffness

  • MP or IP joint stiffness
  • Intrinsic tightness
  • Therapy and splinting

Cold Intolerance

  • Transient, usually resolves by 1 year

Overall Complication Rate: 15-25% require minor revision

This completes the complications section.

Reconstruction Outcomes (Types I-II)

Opponensplasty:

  • Good opposition in 80-90%
  • Improved pinch strength by 50-100%
  • High patient satisfaction
  • Maintains thumb appearance

Web Deepening:

  • Improved grasp span
  • 10-20% recurrence requiring revision

UCL Reconstruction:

  • Stability restored in 85-90%
  • May have slight residual laxity

Pollicization Outcomes (Types IIIB-V)

Functional Outcomes:

  • Pinch strength: 50-75% of normal thumb
  • Opposition: Achieved in greater than 90%
  • Grasp: Adequate span for functional activities
  • ROM: IP and MP motion 70-80% of normal
  • Two-point discrimination: 6-10mm (normal 3-5mm)

Age-Related Outcomes:

  • 12-18 months (optimal): Excellent cortical reorganization, best functional outcomes
  • 6-12 months: Good outcomes, technically challenging due to size
  • 18 months to 3 years: Good outcomes, less cortical plasticity
  • Greater than 5 years: Fair outcomes, poor brain adaptation

Long-Term Function:

  • Over 90% patient satisfaction
  • Good integration into daily activities
  • Normal hand dominance development
  • Cosmetic acceptance high (especially if done early)

Comparison to Normal Thumb:

  • Length: 80-85% of contralateral thumb
  • Strength: 50-75% of normal thumb
  • Sensibility: Slightly diminished but functional
  • Overall function: 70-85% of normal thumb

Bilateral Pollicization:

  • Excellent outcomes
  • Both hands develop symmetric function
  • No compensation from "good" side, so both hands used equally

Reconstruction vs Pollicization (Type IIIA)

Reconstruction Advantages:

  • Maintains thumb appearance
  • Five-fingered hand
  • May have better cosmesis

Reconstruction Disadvantages:

  • Multiple staged procedures
  • Less predictable functional outcome
  • Requires compliant patient/family for therapy

Pollicization Advantages:

  • More predictable functional outcome
  • Single procedure
  • Better pinch strength
  • Proven long-term results

Pollicization Disadvantages:

  • Four-fingered hand
  • Cosmetic concern for some families
  • Irreversible

Current Trend: Increasing preference for pollicization in Type IIIA with poor extrinsic function or unstable CMC, as functional outcomes superior.

This completes the outcomes section.

Associated Syndromes - Detailed

TAR Syndrome (Thrombocytopenia-Absent Radius)

KEY FEATURE: Radii absent but thumbs PRESENT - differentiates from typical radial club hand.

Clinical Features:

  • Bilateral radial aplasia
  • Thrombocytopenia (low platelets, usually less than 50,000)
  • Thumbs present (may be hypoplastic but always present)
  • Often associated with cow's milk allergy
  • Cardiac anomalies in 30%

Genetics:

  • Compound inheritance: RBM8A gene deletion PLUS modifier allele
  • Autosomal recessive pattern

Management Considerations:

  • Check platelet count BEFORE any surgery
  • Transfuse platelets if less than 50,000 for surgery
  • Thrombocytopenia usually improves after age 1 year
  • Radial club hand requires centralization
  • Thumbs usually do NOT require pollicization (present and functional)

Fanconi Anemia

CRITICAL: Must screen all radial dysplasia patients with chromosome breakage test.

Clinical Features:

  • Progressive bone marrow failure (aplastic anemia)
  • Radial ray abnormalities (radial dysplasia, thumb hypoplasia/aplasia)
  • Short stature
  • Café-au-lait spots, hyperpigmentation
  • Renal anomalies (horseshoe kidney, renal agenesis)
  • Microcephaly, developmental delay
  • Increased cancer risk (AML, head/neck SCC)

Genetics:

  • Autosomal recessive (most common)
  • Over 20 FANC genes identified
  • DNA repair defect

Diagnosis:

  • Chromosome breakage test: DEB (diepoxybutane) or MMC (mitomycin C)
  • Fanconi cells show increased chromosomal breaks and rearrangements when exposed to DNA crosslinking agents
  • Genetic testing for FANC gene mutations

Management:

  • Hematology follow-up for bone marrow function
  • Monitor for malignancy
  • Orthopedic surgery timing coordinated with hematologist
  • Bone marrow transplant may be needed
  • Genetic counseling

Surgical Considerations:

  • Can proceed with pollicization/reconstruction if blood counts adequate
  • Increased bleeding risk if thrombocytopenic
  • Long-term cancer surveillance

VACTERL Association

Acronym Components:

  • Vertebral anomalies (hemivertebrae, scoliosis)
  • Anal atresia/imperforate anus
  • Cardiac defects (VSD, ASD, TOF)
  • Tracheo-Esophageal fistula/esophageal atresia
  • Renal anomalies (agenesis, dysplasia, hydronephrosis)
  • Limb abnormalities (radial dysplasia, thumb hypoplasia)

Diagnosis:

  • At least 3 components required
  • Non-random association (not a syndrome, no single genetic cause)

Workup:

  • Spine X-rays
  • Echocardiography
  • Renal ultrasound
  • GI evaluation if feeding difficulties

Orthopedic Management:

  • Thumb reconstruction/pollicization as per Blauth classification
  • Scoliosis monitoring and treatment if needed

Holt-Oram Syndrome

Clinical Features:

  • Upper limb radial ray deficiency (thumb hypoplasia/aplasia to phocomelia)
  • Cardiac septal defects (ASD, VSD) - present in 75%
  • Conduction abnormalities (first-degree AV block)

Genetics:

  • Autosomal dominant
  • TBX5 gene mutation (transcription factor important for heart and limb development)
  • Variable expressivity

Cardiac Evaluation:

  • Echocardiography mandatory
  • ECG (may show AV block)
  • Cardiology clearance before surgery

Orthopedic Management:

  • Pollicization as indicated
  • Cardiac status may affect surgical timing

Other Associations

Diamond-Blackfan Anemia

  • Congenital red cell aplasia
  • Thumb hypoplasia, radial dysplasia
  • Short stature, craniofacial anomalies

Aase Syndrome

  • Hypoplastic anemia
  • Triphalangeal thumbs
  • Cleft palate, narrow shoulders

Nager Syndrome (Acrofacial Dysostosis)

  • Mandibular hypoplasia
  • Radial ray deficiency
  • Thumb hypoplasia/aplasia

Differential Diagnosis

Conditions to Differentiate from Thumb Hypoplasia

Thumb Duplication (Polydactyly)

  • Extra thumb rather than underdeveloped thumb
  • Wassel classification
  • Treatment: Excision of less functional duplicate

Trigger Thumb (Congenital)

  • Flexion contracture of IP joint
  • Notta's node palpable
  • Usually not associated with hypoplasia
  • Treatment: Release of A1 pulley

Thumb Clasped Thumb Deformity

  • Thumb held in palm (adduction and flexion)
  • EPL and EPB deficiency or absence
  • Treatment: Splinting, tendon transfers if persistent

Radial Polydactyly with Hypoplastic Components

  • Combination of duplication and hypoplasia
  • Both thumbs may be hypoplastic
  • May require Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure (combine two hypoplastic thumbs)

Arthrogryposis with Thumb Involvement

  • Multiple joint contractures
  • Thumb-in-palm deformity
  • Other limb involvement

Symbrachydactyly

  • Short, webbed digits
  • Can involve thumb
  • Usually sporadic

Complications

Complication Summary

Pollicization Complications:

  • Vascular compromise (less than 1%): MOST SERIOUS - immediate re-exploration
  • Web space contracture (10-15%): Revision Z-plasty
  • Malposition (5-10%): Revision osteotomy if severe
  • Tendon imbalance: Revision tendon work

Reconstruction Complications:

  • Under/over-tensioned opponensplasty
  • Web contracture recurrence
  • Persistent UCL instability

Management of Complications

Vascular Compromise:

  • Immediate return to OR
  • Release all constrictive dressings/sutures
  • Ensure no tension on pedicle
  • May require revision of thumb position

Web Space Contracture:

  • Revision four-flap Z-plasty
  • May need skin grafting
  • Splinting post-revision

Malposition:

  • Assess rotation and abduction
  • Revision osteotomy at metacarpal level
  • Timing: After 6-12 months if not improving

Postoperative Care

Postoperative Protocol

Pollicization:

  • Long arm thumb spica cast: 4-6 weeks
  • K-wire removal: 4-6 weeks
  • Vascular monitoring: First 48 hours critical
  • Passive ROM: 6 weeks post-op
  • Active ROM: 8 weeks post-op

Reconstruction:

  • Short arm splint: 4 weeks
  • Opponensplasty protection: 6 weeks
  • Therapy: Active ROM at 4-6 weeks

Rehabilitation Phases

Phase 1 (0-6 weeks):

  • Immobilization in cast/splint
  • Edema control
  • Adjacent joint ROM

Phase 2 (6-12 weeks):

  • Gentle passive then active ROM
  • Scar management
  • Light grasp activities

Phase 3 (3-6 months):

  • Progressive strengthening
  • Functional activities
  • Play-based therapy for children

Note: Children typically regain function through play without formal therapy

Outcomes

Outcome Summary

Pollicization (Types IIIB-V):

  • Opposition achieved: greater than 90%
  • Pinch strength: 50-75% of normal
  • Grasp function: Excellent
  • Cosmetic acceptance: High (especially if early)

Reconstruction (Types I-II):

  • Opponensplasty success: 80-90%
  • Web space maintained: 80-90%
  • May require revision procedures

Age-Related Outcomes

12-18 months (optimal):

  • Best cortical reorganization
  • Index cortical area becomes thumb area
  • Excellent functional integration

Greater than 5 years:

  • Diminished cortical plasticity
  • Less intuitive thumb use
  • Still worthwhile but outcomes less optimal

Long-term (10+ years):

  • Stable functional outcomes
  • Growth proportional to hand
  • 90% use pollicized thumb in daily activities

Evidence Base

Pollicization for Congenital Thumb Hypoplasia

IV - Case Series
Manske PR, McCarroll HR Jr • Journal of Hand Surgery (1992)
Key Findings:
  • Over 90% good to excellent functional results
  • Pinch strength 50-75% of normal thumb
  • Better outcomes when performed before age 2 years
  • Four-flap skin incision optimizes web space creation
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Buck-Gramcko Pollicization Technique

V - Expert Opinion/Technique
Buck-Gramcko D • Journal of Hand Surgery (1971)
Key Findings:
  • Metacarpal neck osteotomy for 120-140 degrees pronation
  • Preservation of radial digital artery critical
  • First dorsal interosseous repositioned as thenar muscle
  • Four-flap incision for optimal web space depth
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Fanconi Anemia: Diagnosis and Orthopedic Management

IV - Review
Alter BP • American Journal of Hematology (2003)
Key Findings:
  • Chromosome breakage test (DEB/MMC) diagnostic
  • Progressive bone marrow failure develops in childhood
  • 20-30% develop malignancy by age 40
  • Orthopedic surgery safe if blood counts adequate
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Treatment of Blauth Type IIIA Thumb Hypoplasia

IV - Case Series
Cheng JC, Ng BK, Ying SY, Fung BK • Journal of Hand Surgery (1999)
Key Findings:
  • Pollicization group: better pinch strength, ROM, function
  • Reconstruction group: required multiple procedures, variable outcomes
  • Family preference important in Type IIIA decision
  • CMC stability critical determinant of success with reconstruction
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Long-Term Outcomes After Pollicization

IV - Case Series
Goldfarb CA, Murtha YM, Gordon JE, et al • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Mean follow-up 16 years (range 10-29 years)
  • 90% satisfied with function and appearance
  • Pinch strength 60% of normal, stable over time
  • All patients incorporated pollicized thumb in daily activities
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Blauth Classification and Treatment Planning

EXAMINER

"A 9-month-old child presents with bilateral thumb hypoplasia. On the right, there is a small thumb with absent thenar muscles, narrow web space, but stable CMC and MP joints. On the left, the thumb appears as a small nubbin attached by a skin bridge with no functional structures. How would you assess and manage this child?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This child has bilateral thumb hypoplasia with different Blauth types on each side. I would take a systematic approach: First, complete history including maternal diabetes, family history, and developmental assessment. Second, examine both thumbs carefully - the right appears to be Blauth Type II (absent thenar muscles but stable joints), while the left appears Type IV pouce flottant (floating thumb). Third, I would assess for associated syndromes - examine for radial dysplasia, check cardiac exam for Holt-Oram, and order investigations including CBC (rule out TAR), chromosome breakage test (Fanconi), and echocardiography. For the right Type II thumb, I would plan opponensplasty with web space deepening at 12-18 months. For the left Type IV, I would plan pollicization, likely performing the more complex left pollicization first at 12-18 months, then the right reconstruction 3-6 months later. I would counsel the family about different functional outcomes - the pollicized thumb will have better pinch strength but the hand will have four fingers, while the reconstructed thumb maintains five-finger appearance but may have weaker function.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize different Blauth types on each side
Systematic syndrome workup mandatory (TAR, Fanconi, Holt-Oram, VACTERL)
Chromosome breakage test essential to rule out Fanconi
Pollicization for Type IV (absolute indication)
Reconstruction for Type II (opponensplasty, web deepening)
Stage bilateral procedures, starting with more complex side
COMMON TRAPS
✗Missing associated syndrome workup - may have life-threatening hematologic or cardiac issues
✗Attempting reconstruction on Type IV - this requires pollicization
✗Not checking for Fanconi anemia - critical for long-term prognosis
✗Not discussing different outcomes and expectations for each hand
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How do you differentiate Blauth IIIA from IIIB? (CMC stability - stress test under fluoroscopy if needed)"
"What is TAR syndrome and how does it present? (Thrombocytopenia-Absent Radius, but thumbs PRESENT)"
"Describe the chromosome breakage test for Fanconi. (DEB or MMC test - Fanconi cells show increased breaks)"
"What are the contraindications to pollicization? (Abnormal index finger, inadequate vascularity, no absolute contraindications if index normal)"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 2: Pollicization Surgical Technique

EXAMINER

"You are performing a pollicization for a Blauth Type V thumb aplasia in an 18-month-old child. Walk me through your surgical technique, focusing on the key steps and critical structures to preserve."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
For this Blauth Type V pollicization, I would use the Buck-Gramcko technique. First, positioning: supine with arm on hand table, tourniquet, loupe magnification. Second, skin incision: I would design a four-flap incision - dorsal racquet over index metacarpal, volar flap from midaxial index around web to middle finger, creating triangular flaps for web space Z-plasty. Third, neurovascular preservation: I would carefully identify and preserve both digital neurovascular bundles to the index, particularly the radial digital artery which is CRITICAL for thumb vascularity. Fourth, tendon preparation: FDP to index becomes FPL, EDC and EIP become EPL and EPB. Fifth, the key step is metacarpal neck wedge osteotomy - I remove a 20-30 degree wedge to pronate the new thumb 120-140 degrees so the nail faces radially, fixing with K-wire. Sixth, positioning: I would position the new thumb in 140-160 degrees abduction from middle finger, with appropriate pronation and slight palmar flexion. Seventh, intrinsic repositioning: the first dorsal interosseous is detached and repositioned to the radial side of the proximal phalanx to function as thenar muscle. Eighth, web space creation: I would transpose the four flaps in Z-plasty fashion to create a deep first web. Finally, careful skin closure avoiding tension on neurovascular pedicles, and immobilization in thumb spica cast for 4-6 weeks.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Four-flap skin incision design for optimal web space
CRITICAL: Preserve radial digital artery of index (thumb's blood supply)
Metacarpal neck wedge osteotomy for pronation (key step)
Positioning: 140-160 deg abduction, 120-140 deg pronation
First DI becomes thenar muscle (repositioned to radial base PP)
Tendon transfers: FDP becomes FPL, EDC/EIP become EPL/EPB
Avoid tension on neurovascular pedicles during closure
COMMON TRAPS
✗Inadequate pronation - need osteotomy, not just rotation (nail must face radially)
✗Injury to radial digital artery - catastrophic vascular compromise
✗Excessive tension on pedicles during closure - can cause ischemia
✗Incorrect positioning - too much or too little abduction affects function
✗Forgetting to preserve collateral ligaments at MP joint
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the most serious early complication? (Vascular compromise - requires immediate re-exploration)"
"How do you manage a web space contracture at 6 months post-op? (Revision Z-plasty, possible skin grafting)"
"What happens to cortical representation after pollicization? (Index cortical area reorganizes to become thumb area - best if done before 18-24 months)"
"What are the expected functional outcomes? (Pinch 50-75% of normal, opposition over 90%, high satisfaction over 90%)"
VIVA SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 3: Type IIIA Controversy and Decision-Making

EXAMINER

"A 14-month-old presents with Blauth Type IIIA thumb hypoplasia. The CMC joint is stable on stress testing, but the thumb is very small with absent thenar muscles and no FPL function. The family is concerned about their child having a four-fingered hand. How do you counsel them and what factors influence your decision between reconstruction and pollicization?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Blauth Type IIIA which is the most controversial type regarding reconstruction versus pollicization. I would counsel the family systematically: First, explain that Type IIIA has a stable CMC joint which makes reconstruction theoretically possible, but multiple factors influence the decision. Second, discuss the critical factors: the absent FPL is concerning - reconstruction would require tendon transfer, and the very small metacarpal may not provide adequate skeletal foundation. Third, I would explain reconstruction option: opponensplasty, web space deepening, FPL reconstruction with FDS transfer, possible skeletal augmentation - but this requires multiple staged procedures and outcomes are variable. Fourth, pollicization option: single procedure with predictable functional outcomes, over 90% satisfaction, pinch strength 50-75% of normal - but results in four-fingered hand. Fifth, I would present the evidence: studies show pollicization provides more predictable and superior functional outcomes for Type IIIA, especially when extrinsic tendons absent. Sixth, I would show them photos of pollicization outcomes and discuss that cosmetic acceptance is actually very high when done early. Finally, I would recommend pollicization given the absent FPL and very small metacarpal, but ultimately support the family's informed decision. If they strongly prefer reconstruction, I would proceed staged with close monitoring of functional outcomes and discuss that conversion to pollicization remains an option if function inadequate.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Type IIIA is controversial - stable CMC but absent extrinsics/intrinsics
Key factors: CMC stability, metacarpal quality, presence of extrinsics (FPL/EPL), family preference
Absent FPL is significant negative factor for reconstruction
Pollicization has more predictable outcomes, single procedure
Reconstruction requires multiple stages, variable outcomes
Evidence favors pollicization for Type IIIA with poor extrinsics
Informed family decision with surgeon recommendation
COMMON TRAPS
✗Making absolute statement that reconstruction impossible - it is technically feasible but less predictable
✗Dismissing family's cosmetic concerns - four-fingered hand is a real concern, needs empathetic discussion
✗Not presenting evidence - families need data on outcomes to make informed decision
✗Forcing your recommendation - shared decision-making essential
✗Not discussing option to convert to pollicization if reconstruction fails
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the specific contraindications to reconstruction in Type IIIA? (Unstable CMC, severe metacarpal hypoplasia, completely absent extrinsics, family unable to comply with multiple procedures)"
"If you proceed with reconstruction, what stages are needed? (Stage 1: Opponensplasty and web deepening; Stage 2: UCL reconstruction if needed; Stage 3: Skeletal augmentation/lengthening; Stage 4: FPL reconstruction)"
"What is the Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure? (Combining two equally hypoplastic thumbs - usually for polydactyly with bilateral hypoplasia, creates one thumb from two)"
"At what age does pollicization have diminishing returns? (After 5 years - poor cortical reorganization, less optimal outcomes)"

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Blauth classification for thumb hypoplasia and which types require pollicization?

A: Blauth classification (modified by Manske/McCarroll): Type I: Minor hypoplasia, all structures present; Type II: Intrinsic muscle hypoplasia, first web space narrowing, UCL instability; Type IIIA: Type II + extrinsic tendon abnormalities, stable CMC joint; Type IIIB: Type III + unstable CMC joint (global proximal deficiency); Type IV: Floating thumb (pouce flottant); Type V: Absent thumb. Pollicization indicated for Types IIIB, IV, and V - reconstructing an unstable or floating thumb yields inferior results to pollicization.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the critical distinction between Blauth Type IIIA and Type IIIB thumb hypoplasia?

A: The critical distinction is CMC joint stability. Type IIIA: CMC joint is stable (basal joint elements intact) - amenable to reconstruction (opponensplasty, tendon transfers, first web release). Type IIIB: CMC joint is unstable (deficient trapezium, metacarpal base) - reconstruction gives poor results, pollicization preferred. Clinical assessment: passively stress the CMC joint; radiographs may show hypoplastic trapezium. This distinction is crucial for surgical planning - Type IIIB represents a threshold below which pollicization gives superior functional outcomes.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is pollicization and what are the key technical principles?

A: Pollicization converts the index finger into a thumb. Key principles: 1) Shorten and rotate index metacarpal approximately 160 degrees into pronation; 2) Position in palmar abduction and opposition; 3) Transfer intrinsics to recreate thenar function (first dorsal interosseous becomes APB, first palmar interosseous becomes adductor); 4) Preserve neurovascular bundles; 5) Close first web space primarily. Optimal timing is 12-18 months of age. The index finger never achieves normal thumb strength but provides excellent pinch and grasp function.

Exam Pearl

Q: What conditions are associated with thumb hypoplasia?

A: Thumb hypoplasia is commonly associated with: Radial longitudinal deficiency (radial club hand) - most common association; Holt-Oram syndrome (heart-hand syndrome - cardiac septal defects + radial ray deficiency); VACTERL association; Fanconi anemia (bone marrow failure, short stature); TAR syndrome (thrombocytopenia-absent radius - thumbs present); Trisomy 18. Isolated thumb hypoplasia also occurs. All patients require cardiac echocardiography, renal ultrasound, and hematology workup (CBC, chromosomal breakage studies for Fanconi).

Exam Pearl

Q: What are the surgical options for Blauth Type II thumb hypoplasia?

A: Type II hypoplasia has all skeletal elements but deficient thenar muscles, first web narrowing, and UCL laxity. Surgical options: 1) First web space release/Z-plasty - address contracture; 2) Opponensplasty - restore opposition (Huber transfer using ADM, FDS ring finger transfer, EIP transfer); 3) UCL reconstruction - stabilize MCP joint; 4) FPL augmentation if weak. Surgery is typically staged: web release first, then tendon transfers after 6-12 months. Combination of procedures can achieve functional thumb with stable pinch.

Australian Context

Referral Pathways

Specialist Centers:

  • Pediatric hand units at major children's hospitals
  • Sydney Children's Hospital, Royal Children's Melbourne, Lady Cilento Brisbane
  • Multidisciplinary clinics with hand surgery, genetics, hematology

Early Referral: Ideally by 3-6 months for assessment and planning

Syndrome Screening

Australian Testing:

  • Chromosome breakage testing available at major genetics labs
  • Fanconi anemia panel via genetic testing services
  • Echocardiography widely available
  • Genetic counseling services at children's hospitals

Medicare/PBS

Funding:

  • Pollicization covered under MBS (item 45461)
  • Opponensplasty procedures covered
  • Public hospital care for pediatric patients
  • Private health covers with hand surgery rebates

Support Services

Resources:

  • Australian Hand Surgery Society guidelines
  • NDIS funding for therapy and equipment
  • Genetic support groups for syndromic conditions
  • Limb deficiency support organizations

Clinical Pearl

Exam Viva Point - Australian Practice: In Australia, thumb hypoplasia surgery is performed at tertiary pediatric centers with hand surgery expertise. All patients should be screened for Fanconi anemia with chromosome breakage testing available through major genetics laboratories. Timing of 12-18 months optimal. Multidisciplinary approach with genetics, hematology if syndromic.

THUMB HYPOPLASIA

High-Yield Exam Summary

Blauth Classification (CRITICAL)

  • •Type I: Minor hypoplasia, all structures present - OPPONENSPLASTY
  • •Type II: Absent thenar, narrow web, stable CMC/MP - RECONSTRUCTION
  • •Type IIIA: Stable CMC, absent extrinsics/intrinsics - CONTROVERSIAL
  • •Type IIIB: UNSTABLE CMC, partial MC - POLLICIZATION
  • •Type IV: Pouce flottant (floating, PP only) - POLLICIZATION
  • •Type V: Complete absence (aplasia) - POLLICIZATION

Key Decision Point: IIIA vs IIIB

  • •IIIA: Stable CMC - Reconstruct OR pollicize (controversial)
  • •IIIB: UNSTABLE CMC - Pollicize (absolute)
  • •Test CMC stability with stress testing, fluoroscopy if uncertain
  • •Absent FPL/EPL favors pollicization even if CMC stable

Associated Syndromes (Screen ALL cases)

  • •TAR: Thrombocytopenia + Absent Radius + thumbs PRESENT
  • •Fanconi: Radial dysplasia + Chromosome breakage test (DEB/MMC)
  • •VACTERL: Vertebral, Anal, Cardiac, TE fistula, Renal, Limb
  • •Holt-Oram: Cardiac septal defects + radial dysplasia (TBX5 gene)
  • •ALWAYS: CBC, chromosome breakage, echo, renal US

Pollicization Technique (Buck-Gramcko)

  • •Four-flap skin incision for web space Z-plasty
  • •Preserve radial digital artery of index (CRITICAL)
  • •Metacarpal neck wedge osteotomy: 20-30 deg for pronation
  • •Position: 140-160 deg abduction, 120-140 deg pronation
  • •First DI repositioned as thenar muscle (radial base PP)
  • •FDP becomes FPL, EDC/EIP become EPL/EPB
  • •Immobilize 4-6 weeks in thumb spica

Reconstruction Components (Type I-II)

  • •Opponensplasty: FDS ring (most common), ADM (Huber), or ECRL
  • •Web deepening: Four-flap Z-plasty (60-deg angles)
  • •UCL reconstruction: PL graft, figure-8 through bone tunnels
  • •Skeletal augmentation: Bone graft to MC if severely hypoplastic

Surgical Timing and Outcomes

  • •OPTIMAL: 12-18 months (before cortical pinch representation)
  • •Pollicization outcomes: Pinch 50-75% normal, opposition over 90%
  • •Satisfaction over 90%, cosmetic acceptance high if early
  • •Late pollicization (older than 5 years): poorer outcomes, less plasticity

Complications

  • •MOST SERIOUS: Vascular compromise - immediate re-exploration
  • •Web contracture 10-15% - revision Z-plasty
  • •Malposition 5-10% - may need revision osteotomy
  • •Opponensplasty: under-tensioning (weak) or over-tensioning (swan-neck)

Exam Traps

  • •TAR: Thumbs PRESENT (vs radial club hand: thumbs absent/hypoplastic)
  • •MUST screen Fanconi with chromosome breakage test (bone marrow failure)
  • •Type IIIB requires pollicization (UNSTABLE CMC is absolute indication)
  • •Pollicization timing: 12-18mo optimal (brain plasticity critical)

References

  1. Blauth W. Der hypoplastische Daumen. Arch Orthop Unfall-Chir. 1967;62(3):225-246.

  2. Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicization of the index finger: Method and results in aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(8):1605-1617.

  3. Manske PR, McCarroll HR Jr. Reconstruction of the congenitally deficient thumb. Hand Clin. 1992;8(1):177-196.

  4. Goldfarb CA, Murtha YM, Gordon JE, et al. Developmental outcomes of the digits pollicized for congenital thumb hypoplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(2):279-287.

  5. Cheng JC, Ng BK, Ying SY, Fung BK. A 10-year study of 300 cases of thumb hypoplasia. J Hand Surg Br. 1999;24(4):472-476.

  6. Kozin SH. Pollicization: the concept, technical details, and outcome. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(1):18-35.

  7. Alter BP. Diagnosis, genetics, and management of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2007:29-39.

  8. Greenhalgh DG, Warden GD, Moncrief JA, et al. The pollicization procedure: a review of 139 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18(1):4-12.

  9. Light TR, Ogden JA. Congenital constriction band syndrome: pathophysiology and treatment. Yale J Biol Med. 1993;66(3):143-155.

  10. James MA, Green HD, McCarroll HR Jr, Manske PR. The association of radial deficiency with thumb hypoplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(10):2196-2205.

  11. Tonkin MA, Tolerton SK, Quick TJ, et al. Classification of congenital anomalies of the hand and upper limb: development and assessment of a new system. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(9):1845-1853.

  12. Bayne LG, Klug MS. Long-term review of the surgical treatment of radial deficiencies. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12(2):169-179.

  13. McCarroll HR Jr. Congenital anomalies: a 25-year overview. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(6):1007-1037.

  14. Netscher DT, Baumholtz MA. Treatment of congenital hypoplasia and absence of the thumb. Hand Clin. 2009;25(2):151-171.

  15. Mih AD, Villareal-Rios A, Abrams RA, Hanel DP. Hypoplastic thumb. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(4):246-255.

  16. Bae DS, Canizares MF, Miller PE, et al. Predictors of functional outcomes following index finger pollicization for congenital thumb hypoplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(11):2227-2233.

  17. Sammer DM, Chung KC. Congenital hand differences: embryology and classification. Hand Clin. 2009;25(2):151-171.

  18. Staines KG, Majzoub R, Thornby J, Netscher DT. Functional outcomes following pollicization for treatment of thumb hypoplasia/aplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(6):1201-1213.

  19. Wang AA, Tan J, Leit ME. Thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome: a clinical review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(3):e27-e30.

  20. Hosalkar HS, Shah MA, Yoon M, et al. Pollicization of the index finger for congenitally absent or hypoplastic thumb. Orthopedics. 2009;32(8):571-577.

Quick Stats
Reading Time136 min
Related Topics

Animal Bites

Anterior Interosseous Nerve Anatomy

Blood Supply of the Forearm

Boutonniere Deformity