Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

TKA Wound Complications

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

TKA Wound Complications

Prevention and management of wound complications after total knee arthroplasty including superficial infections, dehiscence, and wound healing problems

complete
Updated: 2026-01-14

TKA Wound Complications

High Yield Overview

TKA WOUND COMPLICATIONS

Wound complications following total knee arthroplasty encompass a spectrum from

4%
—prevalence
—blue

Critical Must-Knows

  • Key point requiring clinical understanding
  • Key point requiring clinical understanding
  • Key point requiring clinical understanding

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Exam point to remember
  • "
    Exam point to remember
  • "
    Exam point to remember

Critical Decision Points

Mnemonic

Risk Factors for TKA Wound Complications

W
Weight (BMI greater than 35)
O
Oral steroids and immunosuppression
U
Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c greater than 8%)
N
Nutrition poor (albumin less than 3.5g/dL)
D
Dermatologic conditions (psoriasis, eczema)
R
Revision surgery or previous incisions
I
Inflammatory arthropathy (RA)
S
Smoking (current or recent)
K
Knee previous radiation or surgery

Epidemiology

Incidence and Burden

Overall Incidence

Wound complications after TKA represent a significant clinical challenge with substantial implications for patient outcomes and healthcare costs.

Primary TKA

Revision TKA

Infection Progression

Healthcare Cost

Australian Context

The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) data demonstrates approximately 70,000 knee arthroplasties performed annually in Australia. With a 2% wound complication rate, this translates to approximately 1,400 significant wound problems annually requiring additional intervention. The burden is disproportionately higher in regional centres where access to plastic surgery may be limited.

Medicare data indicates increasing revision burden, with wound-related complications contributing to early revision rates. The AOANJRR 2023 annual report identifies infection (encompassing wound complications) as the leading cause of early revision within 2 years of primary TKA.

Temporal Patterns

Time PeriodWound Complication TypeFrequency
0-7 daysWound drainage, haematomaMost common period
1-2 weeksSuperficial infection, early dehiscenceCritical intervention window
2-4 weeksDelayed healing, skin necrosisDecision point for flap coverage
1-3 monthsChronic wound, sinus formationIndicates deep infection

Patient and Surgical Factors

Host Factors

Understanding and optimizing modifiable risk factors is essential for prevention. The literature consistently identifies patient-related factors as the primary determinants of wound healing.

Obesity (BMI greater than 35)

  • Most significant modifiable risk factor
  • BMI greater than 40 increases risk 6-fold
  • Weight loss of 5-10% significantly reduces risk
  • Consider bariatric referral for BMI greater than 45

Diabetes Mellitus

  • HbA1c greater than 8% associated with 2-3x increased risk
  • Perioperative glucose control critical (target less than 10 mmol/L)
  • Preoperative optimization period 3-6 months ideal
  • Continuous glucose monitoring perioperatively recommended

Smoking

  • Current smoking doubles wound complication risk
  • Minimum 4 weeks cessation recommended preoperatively
  • 8 weeks cessation optimal for microvascular recovery
  • Quitline referral (13 7848) as standard practice

Nutrition

  • Albumin less than 3.5 g/dL associated with poor healing
  • Prealbumin more sensitive marker of acute nutrition status
  • Total lymphocyte count less than 1500 indicates immunocompromise
  • Dietitian referral for optimization

Medications

  • Corticosteroids: prednisolone greater than 10mg daily increases risk
  • Methotrexate: continue through surgery (current evidence)
  • Biologics: hold 1-2 dosing cycles preoperatively
  • Anticoagulation: increases haematoma risk

Previous Surgery

  • Multiple previous incisions increase risk 3-fold
  • Prior medial parapatellar approach is preferred for revision
  • Avoid crossing previous scars if possible
  • Skin bridge less than 7cm increases necrosis risk

Inflammatory Arthropathy

  • Rheumatoid arthritis: thin, friable skin
  • Psoriatic arthritis: Koebner phenomenon risk
  • Systemic lupus: vasculitis and poor healing
  • Scleroderma: fibrosis and limited tissue laxity

Peripheral Vascular Disease

  • Ankle-brachial index less than 0.9 increases risk
  • Absent pedal pulses warrant vascular assessment
  • Previous peripheral bypass increases complexity
  • Consider vascular surgery input preoperatively

Previous Radiation

  • History of soft tissue sarcoma treatment
  • Skin changes and fibrosis
  • Often requires primary flap coverage
  • Discuss with plastic surgery preoperatively

Surgical Factors

Incision Placement

Tissue Handling

Haemostasis

Closure Technique

Risk Stratification

Risk CategoryCharacteristicsManagement Strategy
Low RiskBMI less than 30, non-smoker, HbA1c less than 7%, no previous surgeryStandard precautions
Moderate RiskBMI 30-40, controlled diabetes, previous surgeryEnhanced optimization, consider drain
High RiskBMI greater than 40, HbA1c greater than 8%, immunosuppression, PVDMultidisciplinary optimization, extended antibiotics, plastic surgery consultation
Very High RiskPrior radiation, scleroderma, multiple risk factorsConsider primary flap coverage, staged approach

Classification

Classification of Wound Complications

Anatomical Classification

Definition: Involvement of skin and subcutaneous tissue only, without extension to deep fascia or joint.

Types:

  • Prolonged drainage: Serous or serosanguinous discharge beyond 5-7 days
  • Superficial dehiscence: Partial separation without fascial involvement
  • Skin necrosis: Full-thickness skin death, variable extent
  • Superficial infection: Cellulitis, suture abscess, superficial SSI

Key Features:

  • Intact deep fascia on probing
  • No communication with joint space
  • Culture typically skin flora
  • Systemic symptoms absent or mild

Definition: Extension through deep fascia with potential or actual communication with prosthetic joint.

Types:

  • Deep dehiscence: Fascial separation with exposed capsule
  • Full-thickness necrosis: Skin, subcutaneous, and fascial involvement
  • Deep infection: DAIR criteria met
  • Exposed prosthesis: Direct visualization of implant

Key Features:

  • Fascial disruption present
  • Joint involvement confirmed or suspected
  • Systemic inflammatory response common
  • Requires surgical intervention

Temporal Classification

TimingClassificationAetiologyImplications
Less than 2 weeksAcuteTechnical factors, haematoma, early infectionBest prognosis if addressed promptly
2-4 weeksSubacuteHealing failure, skin necrosis evolvingWindow for salvage with soft tissue procedures
Greater than 4 weeksDelayed/ChronicEstablished necrosis, chronic wound, biofilmHigher risk of deep infection, more complex reconstruction
Greater than 3 monthsLateSinus tract, chronic infectionUsually indicates PJI requiring staged revision

Severity Grading

Grade I - Minor

  • Prolonged drainage less than 10 days
  • Responds to local measures
  • No skin necrosis
  • Normal inflammatory markers

Grade II - Moderate

  • Drainage 10-14 days OR superficial dehiscence
  • Requires theatre for washout/closure
  • Limited skin necrosis (less than 2cm)
  • Elevated but improving inflammatory markers

Grade III - Major

  • Drainage greater than 14 days OR deep dehiscence
  • Skin necrosis greater than 2cm
  • Exposed capsule or extensor mechanism
  • Persistently elevated inflammatory markers

Grade IV - Severe

  • Exposed prosthesis
  • Full-thickness necrosis
  • Failed previous intervention
  • Deep infection confirmed


Clinical Presentation

Clinical Presentation and Assessment

History

Key Questions:

  • Timing of symptom onset relative to surgery
  • Character of drainage (serous, serosanguinous, purulent, haemoserous)
  • Volume of drainage (saturating dressings, frequency of changes)
  • Associated symptoms (fever, increasing pain, swelling)
  • Compliance with postoperative instructions
  • Any trauma or falls

Red Flags:

  • Fever greater than 38.5 degrees C
  • Increasing pain after initial improvement
  • Purulent drainage at any time
  • Systemic symptoms (malaise, rigors)
  • Failure of wound to progress after 5-7 days

Examination

Wound Assessment:

  • Extent of erythema (mark and date margins)
  • Character of drainage on dressing
  • Presence of necrosis (eschar, purple discoloration)
  • Wound edge approximation
  • Tension on closure
  • Evidence of haematoma

Surrounding Skin:

  • Tissue turgor and quality
  • Previous scars
  • Skin grafts or flaps
  • Evidence of venous insufficiency

Wound:

  • Fluctuance suggesting collection
  • Crepitus (concerning for gas-forming organisms)
  • Wound edge stability
  • Underlying tissue consistency

Joint Assessment:

  • Range of motion (guarded suggests effusion/infection)
  • Effusion
  • Warmth compared to contralateral
  • Patella mobility

Wound Probing:

  • Sterile probe to assess depth
  • Communication with joint (if suspected, do in theatre)
  • Tracking along fascial planes

Vascular Assessment:

  • Capillary refill
  • Peripheral pulses
  • Ankle-brachial index if concern

Investigations

Blood Tests

Joint Aspiration

Wound Swab

Imaging

Differential Diagnosis

ConditionFeaturesDistinguishing Factors
HaematomaEarly, fluctuant, ecchymosisUsually presents day 0-3; decreasing with time
SeromaNon-tender, fluctuant, clear fluidMay be late; aspirate is straw-coloured
Superficial InfectionErythema, warmth, tendernessResponds to antibiotics; markers mildly elevated
Deep InfectionSystemic symptoms, joint involvementElevated markers, positive aspirate
Wound Tension/NecrosisProgressive skin changesMay have minimal drainage initially
Fat NecrosisFirm, tender nodulesObese patients; may drain oily fluid

Prevention Strategies

Preoperative Optimization

Diabetes Control

  • Target HbA1c less than 8% (ideally less than 7%)
  • Endocrinology referral for poor control
  • Perioperative glucose monitoring protocol
  • Insulin sliding scale in hospital

Nutrition

  • Albumin target greater than 3.5 g/dL
  • Preoperative oral supplements (e.g., Ensure, Resource)
  • Consider parenteral nutrition if severely malnourished
  • Vitamin C and zinc supplementation

Smoking Cessation

  • Minimum 4 weeks preoperative cessation
  • Nicotine replacement therapy acceptable
  • Quitline referral (13 7848)
  • Consider varenicline/bupropion

Weight Optimization

  • Target BMI less than 40 for elective surgery
  • Dietitian and exercise physiologist referral
  • Consider bariatric surgery referral for BMI greater than 50
  • 5-10% weight loss reduces risk significantly

Dermatologic Conditions

  • Psoriasis: dermatology review, disease control
  • Eczema: optimize before surgery
  • Chronic wounds: heal before elective surgery
  • Venous ulcers: compression, consider vascular input

Hair Removal

  • Clippers only, not razor (reduces SSI)
  • Day of surgery, not night before
  • Avoid if hair not obscuring field

Chlorhexidine Protocol

  • 2% chlorhexidine washes for 5 days preoperatively
  • Documented reduction in skin colonization
  • Avoid mucosal contact
  • Alternative for allergy: povidone-iodine

Staphylococcus Decolonization

  • Nasal mupirocin if MRSA screen positive
  • 5 days preoperatively
  • Reduces SSI by 50% in carriers
  • Consider chlorhexidine bath in addition

Surgical Technique

Incision Planning

  • Use previous incision if adequate
  • Most lateral incision preferred if multiple
  • Minimum 7cm skin bridge between incisions
  • Full-thickness skin flaps
  • Avoid undermining

Tissue Handling

  • No-touch technique for skin edges
  • Avoid Army-Navy retractors on skin edges
  • Self-retaining retractors with care
  • Minimal cautery to dermis
  • Preserve subcutaneous fat layer

Haemostasis

  • Tourniquet use controversial; if used, release before closure
  • Tranexamic acid (topical or IV) reduces haematoma
  • Meticulous point haemostasis
  • Consider drain in high-risk patients (controversial)

Closure Principles

  • Layered closure essential
  • Capsular closure: absorbable braided suture
  • Deep dermal: absorbable monofilament (critical layer)
  • Skin: staples or running subcuticular
  • Minimal tension on skin edges
  • Consider barbed suture for capsule

Postoperative Care

Dressing Management

Drain Management

Early Mobilization

DVT Prophylaxis


Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Tka Wound Complications
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Tka Wound ComplicationsCredit: OrthoVellum

Decision Framework

Indications:

  • Drainage less than 5 days, decreasing trend
  • Superficial erythema responding to elevation
  • Normal or minimally elevated inflammatory markers
  • No systemic symptoms
  • Stable wound appearance

Management:

  • Bed rest with leg elevated
  • Dressing changes as needed (sterile technique)
  • Cease anticoagulation if safe
  • Consider compression
  • Daily wound review
  • Oral antibiotics if superficial infection

Endpoint Criteria:

  • Wound dry for 48 hours
  • Erythema resolved
  • Inflammatory markers normalizing
  • Patient afebrile

Failure Criteria (Proceed to Theatre):

  • No improvement at 48-72 hours
  • Progression of drainage or erythema
  • Rising inflammatory markers
  • New systemic symptoms

Indications:

  • Persistent drainage greater than 5-7 days
  • Wound dehiscence (superficial or deep)
  • Skin necrosis greater than 2cm
  • Suspected haematoma requiring drainage
  • Failed conservative management

Procedure Options:

Wound Irrigation and Debridement

  • Thorough washout (6-9L saline)
  • Debridement of non-viable tissue
  • Culture deep tissue samples
  • Direct closure if possible
  • Consider NPWT if tension

DAIR (if deep infection)

  • Polyethylene exchange
  • Extended debridement
  • Antibiotic treatment per protocol

Postoperative Care:

  • Immobilization in extension splint
  • Extended antibiotics pending culture
  • Daily wound review
  • Low threshold for return to theatre

Indications:

  • Exposed prosthesis
  • Failed previous closure
  • Extensive skin necrosis greater than 5cm
  • Inadequate local tissue for closure
  • Prior radiation field

Flap Options:

Gastrocnemius Flap (Workhorse)

  • Medial head most common
  • Reliable vascular pedicle
  • Good soft tissue bulk
  • Can cover proximal 2/3 of TKA wound

Other Local Options

  • Soleus flap (distal defects)
  • Propeller flaps
  • Perforator flaps (ALT, SCIP)

Free Tissue Transfer

  • Latissimus dorsi
  • ALT (anterolateral thigh)
  • Reserved for large defects, failed local flaps

Key Principles:

  • Early plastic surgery involvement
  • Adequate debridement before coverage
  • Healthy recipient bed
  • Consider staged approach

Specific Scenarios

ScenarioInitial ManagementEscalation TriggerDefinitive Treatment
Drainage day 3-5, stableObservation, bed rest, elevationNo improvement 48hrI&D, direct closure
Drainage greater than 7 daysTheatre within 24-48hrDeep tissue involvementI&D +/- NPWT
Skin necrosis 2-4cmDebridement, assess depthExposed capsuleLocal flap coverage
Exposed prosthesisUrgent plastic surgery consultUnable to cover locallyFree flap or staged revision
Proven deep infectionDAIR protocolVirulent organism, loose implantStaged revision

NPWT (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy)

Role in TKA Wound Complications:

  • Bridge to definitive closure
  • Promotes granulation tissue
  • Reduces oedema and drainage
  • Allows serial debridement
  • NOT a definitive treatment for exposed prosthesis

Technique:

  • White foam over exposed tissue (less adherent)
  • Black foam for granulation (more aggressive)
  • Continuous pressure 75-125 mmHg
  • Changes every 48-72 hours
  • Not through joint capsule if exposed

Contraindications:

  • Active bleeding
  • Malignancy in wound
  • Untreated osteomyelitis
  • Exposed vessels without coverage

Soft Tissue Coverage Options

Local Flaps

Anatomy:

  • Two heads: medial and lateral
  • Medial head larger, more commonly used
  • Vascular pedicle: sural arteries (branches of popliteal)
  • Pivot point at musculotendinous junction

Indications:

  • Proximal and middle third TKA wounds
  • Exposed proximal prosthesis
  • Soft tissue defects up to 10x15cm

Technique:

  • Medial approach for medial head
  • Identify and protect saphenous nerve
  • Divide tendon at musculotendinous junction
  • Rotate into defect
  • Split-thickness skin graft over muscle

Advantages:

  • Reliable blood supply
  • Good tissue bulk
  • Well-established technique
  • Can be performed under tourniquet

Limitations:

  • Cannot reach distal third of wound
  • Cosmetic deficit of calf
  • Minor functional impact (minimal weakness)

Soleus Flap

  • For middle to distal third defects
  • Hemisoleus (medial or lateral) preserves function
  • Smaller arc of rotation than gastrocnemius
  • Can combine with gastrocnemius

Sartorius Flap

  • Limited use around knee
  • Small muscle, limited coverage
  • Useful for medial defects
  • Rarely used for TKA wounds

Propeller Flaps

  • Perforator-based rotation
  • Useful for smaller defects
  • Requires preoperative perforator mapping
  • Less robust than muscle flaps

Fasciocutaneous Flaps

  • Local advancement or rotation
  • Limited by prior incisions
  • Useful for superficial defects
  • Less reliable in irradiated tissue

Indications:

  • Failed local flap options
  • Very large defects
  • Prior radiation
  • Multiple previous surgeries

Common Donor Sites:

Latissimus Dorsi

  • Large muscle, reliable pedicle
  • Can cover extensive defects
  • Donor site well-tolerated
  • Long pedicle allows positioning flexibility

ALT (Anterolateral Thigh)

  • Fasciocutaneous or myocutaneous
  • Less donor morbidity than latissimus
  • Good for moderate-sized defects
  • Thinner than latissimus

Considerations:

  • Microsurgery expertise required
  • Longer operative time
  • Recipient vessel selection (popliteal, genicular)
  • Higher complexity, but excellent salvage option
  • Manage expectations

Coverage Algorithm by Location

Wound LocationFirst-Line CoverageSecond-Line Coverage
Proximal third (above patella)Medial gastrocnemius flapLateral gastrocnemius, free flap
Middle third (patella level)Gastrocnemius flapPropeller flap, free flap
Distal third (below patella)Hemisoleus flapPropeller flap, free flap
Extensive (full incision)Combined gastrocnemius-soleusFree latissimus dorsi

Outcomes

Outcomes and Prognosis

Success Rates

Primary Closure

Gastrocnemius Flap

Free Flap

Overall Prosthesis Retention

Factors Affecting Outcome

FactorFavourableUnfavourable
Timing of InterventionLess than 2 weeks from symptom onsetGreater than 4 weeks
Inflammatory MarkersNormalizing trend pre-flapPersistently elevated
CulturesNegative at time of coveragePositive, especially MRSA/resistant organisms
Patient FactorsNon-smoker, controlled diabetesUncontrolled diabetes, active smoking
Wound AetiologyMechanical (wound tension, haematoma)Established deep infection

Complications of Flap Coverage

Early (less than 2 weeks):

  • Flap necrosis (partial or complete): 5-10%
  • Haematoma: 5%
  • Seroma: 10-15%
  • Skin graft failure: 10-20%

Late (greater than 2 weeks):

  • Chronic wound/sinus: 10-15%
  • Deep infection requiring revision: 10-20%
  • Stiffness (loss of ROM): 20-30%
  • Cosmetic concerns: common

Long-Term Outcomes

Prosthesis Survival:

  • At 2 years: 75-85% with early treatment
  • At 5 years: 65-75%
  • Revision rates higher than uncomplicated TKA

Functional Outcomes:

  • ROM typically reduced (average loss 10-20 degrees flexion)
  • Oxford Knee Score reduced by 5-10 points versus uncomplicated
  • Patient satisfaction variable (70-80% satisfied)
  • Return to activities possible but delayed


Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

TKA Wound Complications

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Numbers

  • •Wound complication rate: 1-4% primary TKA, 4-12% revision
  • •Persistent drainage greater than 5-7 days requires intervention
  • •BMI greater than 40 = 6-fold increased risk
  • •HbA1c target: less than 8% (ideally less than 7%)
  • •Albumin target: greater than 3.5 g/dL
  • •Smoking cessation: minimum 4 weeks, optimal 8 weeks
  • •Skin bridge minimum: 7cm between incisions
  • •Flap coverage success: 90-95% gastrocnemius
  • •Prosthesis retention early treatment: 75-85%
  • •Prosthesis retention late treatment: 50-60%

Classification

  • •Superficial: skin and subcutaneous only, intact fascia
  • •Deep: through fascia, potential joint communication
  • •Acute: less than 2 weeks (best prognosis)
  • •Subacute: 2-4 weeks (window for salvage)
  • •Delayed: greater than 4 weeks (higher infection risk)

Management Triggers

  • •48-72 hour rule: if no improvement, proceed to theatre
  • •Any exposed prosthesis = urgent flap consultation
  • •Necrosis greater than 2cm = likely needs flap
  • •Positive cultures at coverage = worse prognosis
  • •NPWT is bridge to closure, not definitive treatment

Flap Coverage

  • •Gastrocnemius: workhorse, proximal and middle third
  • •Medial head most commonly used (larger)
  • •Soleus: middle to distal third
  • •Free flap: failed local options, large defects
  • •Early plastic surgery involvement improves outcomes

Risk Factors (WOUND RISK)

  • •Weight (BMI greater than 35)
  • •Oral steroids and immunosuppression
  • •Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c greater than 8%)
  • •Nutrition poor (albumin less than 3.5)
  • •Dermatologic conditions
  • •Revision surgery or previous incisions
  • •Inflammatory arthropathy
  • •Smoking (current or recent)
  • •Knee previous radiation or surgery

Prevention Pearls

  • •Chlorhexidine washes x5 days preoperatively
  • •MRSA decolonization if carrier (mupirocin)
  • •No-touch technique for skin edges
  • •Layered closure with deep dermal sutures (critical)
  • •Tranexamic acid reduces haematoma
  • •Undisturbed dressing 48-72 hours postoperatively

Summary

Key Takeaways

Prevention is Better Than Cure

  • Optimize modifiable risk factors preoperatively (obesity, diabetes, smoking, nutrition)
  • Meticulous surgical technique with emphasis on tissue handling
  • Layered closure with attention to deep dermal layer
  • Appropriate postoperative wound care

Early Recognition and Intervention

  • Persistent drainage beyond 5-7 days is a red flag
  • 48-72 hour rule: if conservative measures fail, proceed to theatre
  • Trend of inflammatory markers more important than absolute values
  • Low threshold for surgical exploration in high-risk patients

Definitive Management

  • Aggressive debridement and lavage in theatre
  • Direct closure if possible; NPWT as bridge if not
  • Early plastic surgery involvement for complex wounds
  • Gastrocnemius flap is the workhorse for soft tissue coverage

Outcomes

  • Early treatment (less than 2 weeks) preserves 75-85% of prostheses
  • Delayed treatment (greater than 4 weeks) drops to 50-60%
  • Gastrocnemius flap has 90-95% success rate
  • Functional outcomes reduced but acceptable with successful salvage
Quick Stats
Reading Time61 min
Related Topics

Ankle Arthrodesis

Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral Head

Elbow Arthritis

Hip Arthrodesis