Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Comprehensive guide to total shoulder arthroplasty including indications, surgical technique, glenoid component options, reverse vs anatomic designs, and outcomes for Orthopaedic exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-17
High Yield Overview

TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY

Anatomic vs Reverse | Glenoid Component Selection | Outcomes and Complications

70%anatomic TSA 10-yr survival
25%glenoid loosening at 10 years
90%reverse TSA for cuff tear arthropathy
10-15°acceptable glenoid retroversion

TSA TYPE SELECTION

Anatomic TSA
PatternIntact rotator cuff, concentric glenohumeral OA
TreatmentBall-and-socket restore anatomy
Reverse TSA
PatternRotator cuff deficiency, cuff tear arthropathy
TreatmentSemiconstrained design, deltoid powered
Hemiarthroplasty
PatternYoung, active, glenoid bone loss or no glenoid arthritis
TreatmentHumeral component only

Critical Must-Knows

  • Rotator cuff integrity determines anatomic vs reverse TSA selection
  • Glenoid version greater than 15° retroversion may require bone grafting or augmented component
  • Reverse TSA relies on deltoid function - deltoid must be intact
  • Subscapularis repair critical for anatomic TSA stability and outcomes
  • Periprosthetic infection is devastating - 1-2% incidence, requires staged revision

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Walch classification of glenoid morphology guides component selection (A1, A2, B1, B2, C)
  • "
    Lateralized glenoid designs reduce scapular notching in reverse TSA
  • "
    Metal-backed glenoid components have higher failure rates - all-polyethylene preferred
  • "
    Deltopectoral approach is standard - preserves axillary nerve, allows subscapularis repair

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Total shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis. (A) Pre-operative radiograph of an arthritic shoulder with typical loss of normal joint space. (B) Post-operative radio
Click to expand
Total shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis. (A) Pre-operative radiograph of an arthritic shoulder with typical loCredit: Killian ML et al. via Arthritis Res. Ther. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
X-ray in true AP view shows severe gleno-humeral osteoarthritis with complete obliteration of joint space, glenoid erosion, and the humeral and glenoid osteophytes.
Click to expand
X-ray in true AP view shows severe gleno-humeral osteoarthritis with complete obliteration of joint space, glenoid erosion, and the humeral and glenoiCredit: Merolla G et al. via Transl Med UniSa via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Comparison of anatomic TSA and reverse TSA radiographs
Click to expand
Three-panel comparison showing the evolution from arthritis to arthroplasty. (A) Pre-operative AP shoulder X-ray with severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis. (B) Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) - stemmed humeral component with polyethylene glenoid; requires intact rotator cuff. (C) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) - glenosphere on glenoid with convex humeral cup; used for cuff tear arthropathy or cuff deficiency.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Critical TSA Exam Points

Anatomic vs Reverse Decision

Rotator cuff integrity is KEY. Anatomic TSA requires intact cuff (especially subscapularis and supraspinatus). Reverse TSA for cuff deficiency, massive tears, or cuff tear arthropathy. Preoperative imaging must assess cuff.

Glenoid Version and Bone Loss

Retroversion greater than 15° requires correction. Options include eccentric reaming (up to 10° safe), bone grafting, or augmented components. Excessive reaming risks glenoid fracture or medialization.

Subscapularis Management

Lesser tuberosity osteotomy vs tenotomy. Osteotomy allows bone-to-bone healing, lower failure rate. Repair integrity critical for anatomic TSA - failure leads to instability and poor outcomes.

Reverse TSA Biomechanics

Semiconstrained design. Medialized center of rotation increases deltoid tension and moment arm. Lateralization reduces scapular notching. Must have functioning deltoid - axillary nerve palsy is contraindication.

TSA Quick Decision Guide

Patient ScenarioCuff StatusPreferred ImplantKey Pearl
Age under 65, active, primary OAIntact rotator cuffAnatomic TSABest function and longevity if cuff intact
Age over 70, cuff tear arthropathyMassive irreparable cuff tearReverse TSA90% good outcomes for CTA, deltoid-powered
Young patient, glenoid bone lossIntact cuff, eccentric glenoid wearHemiarthroplastyPreserves glenoid bone stock, may convert to TSA later
Glenoid retroversion greater than 20°Intact cuff, B2 or C glenoidAnatomic TSA with bone graft or augmentExcessive reaming risks fracture - correct with graft
Mnemonic

CUFF FAILIndications for Reverse TSA

C
Cuff tear arthropathy
Massive cuff tear with superior migration and glenohumeral OA
U
Unrepairable massive cuff tear
Pseudoparalysis with intact deltoid
F
Failed rotator cuff repair
Prior repair with persistent pain and dysfunction
F
Fracture sequelae
Proximal humerus fracture nonunion or malunion with cuff deficiency
F
Failed anatomic TSA
Cuff failure after anatomic TSA, revision to reverse
A
Acute proximal humerus fracture
3-4 part fracture in elderly (over 70)
I
Inflammatory arthritis
RA with cuff deficiency
L
Lack of glenoid bone stock
Severe glenoid erosion unsuitable for anatomic component

Memory Hook:When the CUFF FAILs, reverse the shoulder - deltoid takes over!

Mnemonic

ABCDWalch Glenoid Classification (for Anatomic TSA)

A
A1: Minor erosion, centered
Concentric wear, normal version, best candidate
A
A2: Major erosion, centered
Deep concentric wear, may need augmented component
B
B1: Posterior subluxation, mild
Posterior wear, subluxation under 70%, retroversion under 15°
B
B2: Posterior subluxation, severe
Biconcave glenoid, retroversion 15-25°, requires correction
C
C: Retroversion greater than 25°
Dysplasia, severe bone loss, may need bone graft or reverse TSA

Memory Hook:A is Anatomic (centered), B is Backward (posterior), C is Crazy retroverted!

Mnemonic

SCALDDeltopectoral Approach Layers

S
Skin and subcutaneous tissue
Incision from coracoid to deltoid insertion
C
Cephalic vein (lateral border)
Retract laterally with deltoid, protect vein
A
Areolar tissue deltopectoral interval
Internervous plane, blunt dissection
L
Long head biceps tendon
Identify in bicipital groove, tenotomy or tenodesis
D
Deep: Subscapularis and capsule
Lesser tuberosity osteotomy or tenotomy for access

Memory Hook:SCALD the shoulder open - Skin to Deep capsule!

Overview and Epidemiology

Why TSA Matters for Exam

Total shoulder arthroplasty is the definitive treatment for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis with intact rotator cuff (anatomic) or cuff deficiency (reverse). The decision between anatomic and reverse TSA is critical and based on rotator cuff integrity. Reverse TSA has revolutionized treatment of cuff tear arthropathy and proximal humerus fractures in the elderly, with over 35% annual growth in utilization. Glenoid component selection and fixation remain the weak link - glenoid loosening is the most common long-term failure mode.

Primary Indications

  • Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (primary or secondary)
  • Cuff tear arthropathy (reverse TSA)
  • Inflammatory arthritis (RA, severe joint destruction)
  • Osteonecrosis of humeral head (AVN)
  • Acute proximal humerus fracture (reverse, over 70 years old)
  • Failed prior surgery (hemiarthroplasty, fixation)

Epidemiology and Impact

  • 53,000 TSAs annually in USA (2020 data)
  • Reverse TSA now exceeds anatomic (60% reverse, 40% anatomic)
  • 35% annual growth in reverse TSA over past decade
  • Female predominance 2:1 for primary OA
  • Age: mean 70 years, range 50-90
  • 10-year survival: 70-90% depending on design

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Critical Anatomy for TSA

Subscapularis is the anterior dynamic stabilizer - failure after anatomic TSA leads to instability and poor outcomes. Axillary nerve at risk during inferior capsular release (average 7mm from glenoid rim at 6 o'clock). Musculocutaneous nerve enters coracobrachialis 5-8cm distal to coracoid - avoid aggressive medial retraction.

Glenohumeral Joint Anatomy

Bony Anatomy

Glenoid: Pear-shaped, 39mm height, 29mm width (5:4 ratio). Native version 2-10° retroversion. Humeral head 45-55mm diameter, 130° head-shaft angle. Offset center of rotation in anatomic design restores normal kinematics.

Rotator Cuff Dynamics

Subscapularis: Anterior stability, resists posterior subluxation. Supraspinatus: Superior stabilizer, deltoid synergist. Infraspinatus/teres minor: Posterior stability, external rotation. Massive tears lead to superior migration and CTA.

Anatomic vs Reverse TSA Biomechanics

FeatureAnatomic TSAReverse TSA
Center of rotationLateral, anatomic positionMedialized to glenoid face
Motion sourceRotator cuff musclesDeltoid muscle (cuff-independent)
Stability mechanismConcavity-compression, cuff balanceSemiconstrained design, inherent stability
IndicationsIntact cuff, concentric OACuff deficiency, CTA, fracture sequelae
Range of motionNear-normal if cuff intactLimited external rotation, good elevation

Classification Systems

Walch Glenoid Morphology Classification

TypeMorphologyVersionTreatment Strategy
A1Minor central erosion, concentricNormal (under 10°)Standard all-polyethylene component
A2Major central erosion, deep concentric wearNormalMay need augmented or thicker component
B1Posterior subluxation, asymmetric wear10-15° retroversionEccentric reaming (up to 10° safe)
B2Biconcave glenoid, severe posterior wear15-25° retroversionBone graft or augmented component
CDysplastic, severe retroversionOver 25° retroversionBone graft mandatory or reverse TSA

Eccentric Reaming Limits

Maximum 10° correction with eccentric reaming without unacceptable medialization or glenoid fracture risk. For retroversion greater than 15° (B2 or C), consider bone grafting (autograft or allograft), augmented components, or reverse TSA if cuff-deficient.

Glenoid Component Design Options

All-Polyethylene Components

Gold standard. Cemented fixation, keel or pegged design. 10-year survival 70-90%. Lower complication rate than metal-backed. Available in standard and augmented versions for version correction.

Metal-Backed Components (AVOID)

Higher failure rates. Dissociation of polyethylene from backing, increased wear, osteolysis. Thin polyethylene accelerates wear. Not recommended - historical only.

Augmented Components

For B2 glenoids with 15-25° retroversion. Posterior wedge corrects version without excessive reaming. Cemented polyethylene with built-in posterior augmentation. Alternative to bone grafting.

Reverse Glenoid Baseplate

For reverse TSA. Metal baseplate with central screw or peg, peripheral locking screws. Medialized (traditional) or lateralized (reduces notching). Polyethylene glenosphere articulates with humeral cup.

Glenoid Fixation: Keel vs Pegs

DesignAdvantagesDisadvantagesBest Use
Keel (single central keel)Easier insertion, less bone removalLess surface area for cement interdigitationStandard cases, good bone stock
Pegged (multiple peripheral pegs)Greater cement interdigitation, better fixationMore bone removal, difficult in sclerotic boneRevision, osteoporotic bone, high demands

Glenoid Cementation Technique

Pressurization is critical. Use cement restrictor behind component, finger pressurize cement into cancellous bone, insert component with steady pressure. Avoid cement extrusion posteriorly (risks nerve injury). Remove excess cement before polymerization. Cure time: 10-12 minutes.

Clinical Assessment

History and Examination

Key History Points

  • Pain: Location, severity, night pain, functional limitations
  • Function: Activities of daily living (ADLs) affected, work limitations
  • Prior treatment: PT, injections, prior surgery
  • Expectations: Activity demands, occupation, goals
  • Medical comorbidities: Diabetes, smoking, immunosuppression

Physical Examination

  • Active vs passive ROM: Pseudoparalysis suggests cuff tear
  • Rotator cuff strength: Lag signs, drop arm, external rotation weakness
  • Instability testing: Load and shift, sulcus sign
  • AC joint: Tenderness, crossbody adduction pain
  • Neurovascular: Axillary nerve (deltoid sensation), radial pulse

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

Preoperative Imaging Workup

EssentialPlain Radiographs

True AP, scapular Y, axillary lateral. Assess glenohumeral OA, superior migration (acromiohumeral distance less than 7mm suggests massive cuff tear), glenoid version and wear pattern, bone stock. Obtain contralateral shoulder for comparison.

StandardCT Scan with 3D Reconstruction

Assess glenoid version, bone stock, wear pattern (Walch classification). Plan component positioning, identify need for bone graft or augmented component. Measure retroversion (normal 2-10°, B2 glenoid 15-25°, C glenoid over 25°).

If Cuff Status UnclearMRI

Evaluate rotator cuff integrity, fatty infiltration (Goutallier classification). Stage 3-4 fatty infiltration suggests irreparable cuff tear - consider reverse TSA. Assess subscapularis integrity - critical for anatomic TSA.

Contraindications to TSA

Absolute: Active infection, deltoid paralysis (axillary nerve palsy for reverse TSA), Charcot arthropathy. Relative: Young age (under 50 for anatomic), high activity demands, uncorrectable glenoid bone loss, severe osteoporosis, noncompliant patient.

Pre-operative severe shoulder osteoarthritis with cuff tear arthropathy
Click to expand
AP shoulder radiograph demonstrating severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis with rotator cuff tear arthropathy pattern. Note superior migration of humeral head, loss of acromiohumeral interval, and acetabularization of acromion - classic findings indicating need for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty rather than anatomic TSA due to cuff deficiency.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Management Algorithm

Anatomic TSA Pathway

Decision Criteria

Indications: Age under 75, intact rotator cuff (no fatty infiltration), concentric or correctable glenoid wear (Walch A or B1), good bone stock, realistic expectations. Goal: Restore anatomy, preserve cuff function, maximize longevity.

Treatment by Glenoid Type

Walch TypeVersionTreatmentKey Point
A1-A2 (concentric)Normal (under 10°)Standard anatomic TSABest candidate, excellent outcomes
B1 (posterior wear)10-15° retroversionEccentric reaming (up to 10°)Safe correction without bone graft
B2 (biconcave)15-25° retroversionBone graft or augmented componentRequires version correction

Subscapularis Integrity Critical

Anatomic TSA requires intact subscapularis for anterior stability. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy preferred over tenotomy (lower failure rate). Protect repair for 6 weeks postoperatively.

Reverse TSA Pathway

Decision Criteria

Indications: Massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, cuff tear arthropathy (superior migration, OA), pseudoparalysis with intact deltoid, Goutallier stage 3-4 fatty infiltration. Contraindications: Deltoid paralysis (axillary nerve injury), active infection.

Reverse TSA Indications

ScenarioAgeExpected OutcomeKey Consideration
Cuff tear arthropathyOver 7090% satisfaction, pain reliefGold standard for CTA
Irreparable massive cuff tear65-75Good elevation, limited ERMust have pseudoparalysis
Proximal humerus fracture (3-4 part)Over 70Variable outcomesAcute fracture indication

Deltoid Function Essential

Reverse TSA is deltoid-powered. Axillary nerve palsy is absolute contraindication. Assess deltoid carefully preoperatively (sensation over lateral arm, abduction strength).

Alternative Options

Hemiarthroplasty Consideration

Indications: Young (under 50), high activity demands, intact rotator cuff, glenoid bone loss precluding component fixation, or no glenoid arthritis. Advantage: Preserves glenoid bone stock for future conversion to TSA. Disadvantage: Less pain relief than TSA, risk of glenoid erosion over time.

Young Patient Decision Matrix

ScenarioBest OptionRationale
Under 50, intact cuff, normal glenoidAnatomic TSABest function and pain relief if realistic expectations
Under 50, intact cuff, glenoid bone lossHemiarthroplastyPreserve bone stock, accept less pain relief
Under 50, cuff deficiencyNon-operative or tendon transferReverse TSA controversial in young, consider alternatives first

Surgical Technique

Patient Positioning

Setup Checklist

Step 1Position

Beach chair position (30-45° upright) on specialized shoulder positioning system. Head secured in neutral alignment with padded headrest. Contralateral shoulder padded to prevent pressure injury.

Step 2Padding and Nerve Protection
  • Ulnar nerve: Pad medial elbow, avoid direct pressure
  • Brachial plexus: Avoid excessive head rotation or lateral flexion
  • Pressure points: Sacrum, heels, occiput all padded
  • Position arm: Adducted and internally rotated on mobile arm positioner
Step 3Draping and Access
  • Landmarks exposed: Sternoclavicular joint medially, AC joint, deltoid insertion laterally
  • Free drape operative arm to allow full ROM for trial reduction
  • C-arm access: Position for AP and axillary views (if needed)

Beach Chair vs Lateral Decubitus

Beach chair preferred for TSA - easier anatomic orientation, better access to glenoid, allows intraoperative ROM assessment. Lateral decubitus used for arthroscopy or if surgeon preference, but glenoid exposure more difficult.

Deltopectoral Approach

Surgical Approach Steps

Step 1Skin Incision

Landmarks: From coracoid to deltoid insertion (approximately 15cm). Incision in Langer lines (cosmetic). Identify cephalic vein in deltopectoral interval through subcutaneous tissue.

Step 2Interval Development

Deltopectoral interval is internervous plane. Retract cephalic vein laterally with deltoid (protects vein from thrombosis). Blunt dissection of areolar tissue. Superior extent: coracoid. Inferior extent: pectoralis major insertion.

Step 3Clavipectoral Fascia Division

Incise clavipectoral fascia lateral to conjoint tendon. Divide superior 1-2cm of pectoralis major tendon if needed for exposure. Tag with suture for later repair.

Step 4Identify Long Head Biceps

Palpate bicipital groove - long head biceps tendon landmark for rotator interval. Perform tenotomy or tenodesis (surgeon preference). Tenotomy faster, tenodesis reduces cramping but adds time.

Neurovascular Structures at Risk

Axillary nerve: Crosses inferior capsule 5-10mm from glenoid rim at 6 o'clock position. At risk during inferior capsular release - stay on bone, retract with Fukuda or similar retractor. Musculocutaneous nerve: Enters coracobrachialis 5-8cm distal to coracoid tip - avoid aggressive medial retraction. Cephalic vein: Thrombosis if damaged - retract laterally with deltoid.

Subscapularis Approach Options

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy vs Subscapularis Tenotomy

TechniqueAdvantagesDisadvantagesHealing
Lesser tuberosity osteotomyBone-to-bone healing, lower failure rate, preserves attachmentTechnical demanding, risk nonunion or fracture, longer OR timeBone healing 6-8 weeks, reliable
Subscapularis tenotomy (5mm medial to insertion)Faster, easier repair, adequate exposureTendon-to-bone healing, higher failure rate (5-10%)Variable healing, 12 weeks protection
Subscapularis peel (leave on bone)Preserves anatomy, difficult exposureVery difficult repair, high failure riskPoor healing rates, not recommended

Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Technique

Step 1Mark Osteotomy

5-10mm medial to bicipital groove. Use electrocautery to mark osteotomy line vertically along lesser tuberosity. Preserve subscapularis insertion on bone fragment.

Step 2Perform Osteotomy

Thin osteotome or saw. Create bone wafer 5-8mm thick, 3-4cm long, preserving subscapularis attachment. Hinge inferiorly or complete osteotomy. Place stay sutures in subscapularis tendon for retraction.

Step 3Mobilize Subscapularis

Release adhesions posteriorly and inferiorly. 360° release of capsule allows mobilization. Finger sweep behind subscapularis to free scarring. Retract medially with Fukuda retractor for humeral exposure.

Final StepRepair at Closure

Reduce lesser tuberosity anatomically. Fixation with 2-3 transosseous sutures through drill holes in humeral shaft or suture anchors in medullary canal. Repair with arm in 30° external rotation. Test stability before closure.

Subscapularis Repair Strength

Subscapularis failure after anatomic TSA leads to anterior instability and poor outcomes. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy has lower failure rate (under 5%) compared to tenotomy (5-10%). Ensure adequate bone stock, avoid over-medialization of humeral component (increases tension on repair).

Humeral Head Resection and Canal Preparation

Humeral Preparation Steps

Step 1Capsular Release

360° capsular release. Release anterior, inferior, and posterior capsule from humeral neck. Preserve axillary nerve inferiorly - stay anterior to nerve, retract with blunt Fukuda retractor.

Step 2Humeral Head Resection

Anatomic neck resection. Use cutting guide aligned with humeral shaft axis at 130-140° inclination, 20-30° retroversion (align with forearm in neutral rotation). Resect at anatomic neck level. Save humeral head for bone graft if needed.

Step 3Canal Preparation

Entry point: Center of cut surface, in line with canal. Use box chisel or awl to open canal. Sequential reaming or broaching to appropriate size (8-12mm typical). Avoid varus or valgus malalignment - stay in canal axis.

Step 4Version and Height

Version: 20-40° retroversion relative to forearm (align stem fin with transepicondylar axis). Height: Component sits at anatomic neck level, recreates normal offset. Trial components to assess stability and ROM.

Avoid Humeral Fracture

Osteoporotic bone at risk. Use hand reamers or broaches, avoid power tools in thin cortices. Sequential sizing to avoid splitting. If fracture occurs, cerclage wiring or longer stem fixation required. Intraoperative fracture risk 1-2%.

Humeral Component Version

20-40° retroversion relative to transepicondylar axis. Excessive retroversion causes posterior instability, insufficient retroversion limits internal rotation. Align stem fin posteriorly with forearm in neutral - approximates 30° retroversion.

Glenoid Exposure and Preparation

Glenoid Preparation Steps

Step 1Glenoid Exposure

Humeral head retraction. Use humeral head retractor posteriorly, subscapularis/conjoint retracted medially, inferior capsule retracted with Fukuda. 360° labral excision around glenoid rim for visualization. Remove osteophytes.

Step 2Glenoid Surface Preparation

Remove cartilage and subchondral plate with curette or burr to bleeding cancellous bone. Create flat surface perpendicular to scapular body. Identify center of glenoid - intersection of superior-inferior and anterior-posterior bisectors.

Step 3Version Correction (if needed)

Eccentric reaming for B1 glenoids (10-15° retroversion). Ream posterior high, anterior low to correct up to 10° safely. For B2 or C (over 15°), use augmented component or bone graft. Avoid excessive medialization (increases load).

Step 4Glenoid Reaming

Sequential reaming with spherical reamers to match glenoid component size. Create flat or minimal concavity. Ensure perpendicular to scapular axis (check with alignment guide). Ream to bleeding cancellous bone for cement interdigitation.

Step 5Keel or Peg Preparation

Keel slot: Use keel punch or saw to create slot for keel component. Pegs: Drill holes for pegged component at specified locations. Lavage to remove debris (improves cement penetration). Insert cement restrictor behind glenoid if available.

Glenoid Fracture Risk

Excessive reaming or malpositioning risks glenoid fracture - intraoperative complication in 1-2% of cases. Fracture compromises fixation, may require long-term antibiotics if cement extravasation or abandonment of glenoid component (convert to hemiarthroplasty). Use gentle reaming, confirm alignment frequently.

Final Component Implantation

Component Insertion and Closure

Step 1Glenoid Component Cementation

Cement preparation: Mix antibiotic-impregnated PMMA cement (surgeon preference on antibiotic addition). Allow to reach doughy consistency. Pressurization: Finger pressurize cement into cancellous bone, keel slot, and peg holes. Insert component with steady pressure, hold until cement polymerizes (10-12 minutes). Remove excess cement before hardening. Check positioning with AP and axillary views if C-arm available.

Step 2Humeral Component Insertion

Trial first: Insert trial stem and head, reduce, assess stability and ROM. Confirm appropriate head size and offset. Final component: Press-fit or cemented stem (osteoporotic bone or revision). Ensure version aligned (20-40° retroversion). Reduce humeral head onto glenoid, assess ROM and stability in all planes.

Step 3Final Reduction and ROM Check

Passive ROM: Forward elevation to 140-160°, external rotation 30-40°, internal rotation to L3-L5. Stability: No clunk with reduction, anterior-posterior translation minimal. If unstable, consider changing head size, glenoid position, or component version.

Step 4Subscapularis Repair

Reduce lesser tuberosity (if osteotomy) with arm in 30° external rotation. Fixation with transosseous sutures or suture anchors (2-3 points). If tenotomy, side-to-side repair with strong nonabsorbable sutures. Test repair strength with gentle stress before closure.

Step 5Closure

Repair pectoralis major if released (side-to-side or to deltoid). Close clavipectoral fascia. Subcutaneous closure in layers. Skin closure with subcuticular suture or staples. Dressing and immobilization: Bulky dressing, sling with small abduction pillow (optional).

Intraoperative Stability Testing

Stability is paramount. Test anterior-posterior translation, inferior subluxation (sulcus test), and ROM in all planes. Clunk with reduction suggests component malposition or soft tissue imbalance. Instability risk factors: subscapularis failure, excessive retroversion, undersized glenoid, inadequate soft tissue tensioning.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Technique

Reverse TSA Indications

Primary Indications

  • Cuff tear arthropathy (massive tear with OA)
  • Irreparable massive rotator cuff tear with pseudoparalysis
  • Failed rotator cuff repair with persistent dysfunction
  • Proximal humerus fracture (3-4 part, over 70 years old)
  • Failed prior arthroplasty (anatomic TSA with cuff failure)

Secondary Indications

  • Fracture sequelae (nonunion, AVN, malunion with cuff deficiency)
  • Inflammatory arthritis (RA) with cuff deficiency
  • Tumor resection requiring proximal humerus reconstruction
  • Severe glenoid bone loss (Walch C unsuitable for anatomic)

Reverse TSA Biomechanics

Reverse TSA Design Features

FeatureEffectClinical Benefit
Medialized center of rotationIncreases deltoid tension and moment armCompensates for absent cuff, improves elevation
Semiconstrained designInherent stability without cuffAllows function despite massive cuff tear
Large glenosphere (36-42mm)Increases contact arc, reduces notchingBetter ROM, lower impingement
Lateralized glenosphere or humeral offsetMoves COR laterally, reduces notchingImproves external rotation, reduces scapular impingement

Reverse TSA Contraindications

Deltoid paralysis (axillary nerve injury) is absolute contraindication - reverse TSA relies entirely on deltoid function. Active infection, Charcot arthropathy also absolute contraindications. Relative: glenoid bone loss requiring bone grafting, young active patient (under 65), intact cuff (anatomic TSA preferred).

Glenoid Baseplate Fixation

Reverse Glenoid Baseplate Insertion

Step 1Glenoid Exposure and Preparation

Same deltopectoral approach and exposure as anatomic TSA. Flat glenoid preparation - ream to bleeding bone perpendicular to scapular body. No need for concavity. Remove all cartilage and prepare flat surface for baseplate seating.

Step 2Central Guidewire Placement

Ideal trajectory: Perpendicular to glenoid face, aiming toward base of coracoid or superior scapular border. Insert central guidewire through glenoid into scapular body. Confirm position with AP and axillary views. Avoid superior tilt (increases notching risk).

Step 3Baseplate Reaming

Ream over guidewire with cannulated reamer to appropriate depth (typically 3-5mm recess). Ream until good cancellous bone contact. Trial baseplate to ensure flush seating. Avoid excessive reaming (weakens fixation).

Step 4Baseplate Insertion and Screw Fixation

Insert baseplate over central post or screw. Ensure flush seating on glenoid face. Peripheral locking screws: Insert 2-4 screws (superior, inferior, anterior, posterior) into scapular body for supplemental fixation. Screw length 25-40mm (measured on preoperative CT). Torque to specified level, check stability.

Step 5Glenosphere Attachment

Select glenosphere size: 36mm standard, 38-42mm for larger patients or revision. Morse taper or locking mechanism to attach glenosphere to baseplate. Ensure secure seating. Check for debris or loose screws before proceeding to humeral side.

Scapular Notching in Reverse TSA

Scapular notching occurs in 30-60% of reverse TSAs when inferior scapular neck impinges on humeral polyethylene liner with adduction. Reduces ROM, causes pain, potential long-term loosening. Prevention: Lateralized glenosphere, inferior glenosphere tilt, larger glenosphere diameter, humeral neck-shaft angle adjustment.

Humeral Preparation for Reverse TSA

Humeral Side Preparation

Step 1Humeral Head Resection

Variable resection level based on design. Typically 0-10mm proximal to anatomic neck (less bone resection than anatomic TSA). Use cutting guide aligned with humeral shaft. Preserve tuberosities for rotator cuff remnant if present.

Step 2Humeral Canal Preparation

Same as anatomic TSA - sequential reaming or broaching. Version less critical (0-20° retroversion acceptable). Trial stem insertion, check stability and ROM with trial humeral component and polyethylene liner.

Step 3Humeral Component and Liner Insertion

Insert final humeral stem (press-fit or cemented). Attach modular humeral tray. Insert polyethylene liner (thickness 6-12mm) - thicker liner increases tension and stability but reduces ROM. Reduce onto glenosphere, assess ROM and stability.

Reverse TSA Liner Thickness Selection

Thicker liner increases soft tissue tension and stability but reduces ROM and increases risk of scapular notching. Thinner liner improves ROM but risks instability. Start with standard (9mm), upsize to 12mm if unstable, downsize to 6mm if excessive tension or limited ROM. Trial multiple thicknesses intraoperatively.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Glenoid loosening (anatomic TSA)10-25% at 10 yearsEccentric loading, excessive retroversion, poor cementationObservation if asymptomatic, revision to reverse TSA if symptomatic
Periprosthetic infection1-2% (up to 5% in revision)Diabetes, immunosuppression, prior surgery, long OR timeI&D and component retention if acute (under 4 weeks), staged revision if chronic
Instability (anatomic TSA)2-5%Subscapularis failure, component malposition, cuff deficiencyRevision subscapularis repair, liner exchange, convert to reverse TSA
Scapular notching (reverse TSA)30-60%Medialized glenosphere, small glenosphere, inferior positionPrevention: lateralization, larger glenosphere, inferior tilt. Observation if asymptomatic.
Nerve injury (axillary nerve)1-3%Excessive retraction, inferior capsular release, tractionObservation, EMG at 6 weeks, consider nerve exploration if no recovery at 3-6 months
Periprosthetic fracture1-2% (higher in osteoporotic bone)Osteoporosis, trauma, loose component, press-fit stemsORIF if stable component, revision to longer stem if loose, cerclage if intraoperative
Acromial fracture (reverse TSA)2-4%Excessive deltoid tension, osteoporosis, traumaObservation if nondisplaced, ORIF if displaced with functional deficit
Subscapularis failure (anatomic TSA)5-10% (higher with tenotomy)Poor repair, excessive tension, osteoporotic bone, early mobilizationRevision repair if acute, latissimus transfer or convert to reverse if chronic

Periprosthetic Infection Timeline

Acute (under 4 weeks): I&D with component retention, exchange of modular parts, long-term suppressive antibiotics. Success rate 50-70%. Chronic (over 4 weeks): Two-stage revision gold standard - component removal, antibiotic spacer (6-12 weeks), reimplantation. Success rate 80-90%. Culture-negative infection: Consider biofilm formation, extended culture time, treat empirically.

Reverse TSA with acromial stress fracture complication
Click to expand
Two-panel comparison showing acromial stress fracture complication of reverse TSA. (a) Initial post-operative radiograph showing RTSA in good position. (b) Follow-up X-ray with arrows indicating acromial stress fracture - occurs in 2-4% of RTSA cases due to increased deltoid tension and mechanical loading. Management: observation if non-displaced, ORIF if displaced with functional deficit.Credit: PMC - CC BY 4.0

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Anatomic TSA Rehabilitation Timeline

HospitalDay 0-1: Immediate Postoperative

Pain control: Interscalene block (wear off 12-24 hours), multimodal analgesia (opioids, acetaminophen, NSAIDs). Immobilization: Sling with arm in neutral rotation. Passive ROM: Begin pendulum exercises day 1 if pain controlled. DVT prophylaxis: Chemical (enoxaparin or aspirin) and mechanical (SCDs).

EarlyWeeks 0-6: Protection Phase

Sling: Continuous for 4-6 weeks (remove for exercises only). Passive ROM only: Forward elevation to 90°, external rotation to 30° in scapular plane. No active ROM (protects subscapularis repair). No lifting, pushing, pulling. PT 2-3 times per week for passive stretching.

ProgressiveWeeks 6-12: Active-Assisted ROM

Wean sling at 6 weeks if subscapularis healing confirmed (exam, imaging if concern). Begin active-assisted ROM: Pulleys, cane exercises. Isometric strengthening: Gentle scapular stabilizers. Goals: Forward elevation 120-140°, external rotation 40-50°, internal rotation to L5.

AdvancedWeeks 12+: Strengthening

Progressive resistance: Therabands, light weights (1-5 lbs). Functional activities: ADLs, light work tasks. Full ROM: Forward elevation 140-160°, external rotation 50-60°, internal rotation to L3. Return to activities: Golf at 4-6 months, swimming at 3-4 months, avoid contact sports.

Subscapularis Protection Critical

Active internal rotation prohibited for 6 weeks after anatomic TSA to protect subscapularis repair. Failure to protect leads to 5-10% repair failure rate and anterior instability. Patient education essential - no lifting, pushing, reaching behind back. Sling compliance improves healing.

Reverse TSA Rehabilitation Timeline

HospitalDay 0-1: Immediate Postoperative

Pain control: Same as anatomic TSA (interscalene block, multimodal). Immobilization: Sling with small abduction pillow (optional). Passive ROM: Begin pendulum exercises day 1 - reverse TSA is inherently stable, earlier mobilization safe. DVT prophylaxis: Standard protocol.

EarlyWeeks 0-3: Early Mobilization

Sling: For comfort, discontinue at 2-3 weeks. Passive and active-assisted ROM: Forward elevation to 90-120°, external rotation to 20-30°. Earlier progression than anatomic TSA due to semiconstrained design and no cuff repair to protect. PT 2-3 times per week.

ProgressiveWeeks 3-6: Active ROM

Full active ROM: Forward elevation to tolerance (goal 120-140°), external rotation limited (20-40° typical), internal rotation variable. Strengthening: Deltoid-focused exercises (prime mover for reverse TSA). Functional activities: Begin light ADLs.

AdvancedWeeks 6-12: Advanced Strengthening

Progressive resistance: Therabands, light weights for deltoid. Full functional ROM: Forward elevation 130-150° (deltoid-dependent), external rotation limited (lack of infraspinatus/teres minor). Return to activities: Golf at 3-4 months, swimming at 2-3 months.

Reverse TSA External Rotation Limitation

External rotation often limited after reverse TSA (20-40° typical) due to absent posterior cuff (infraspinatus, teres minor). Patients compensate with scapular motion. Lateralized designs and teres minor preservation improve external rotation but add complexity. Set patient expectations preoperatively.

Weight-Bearing and Activities

  • No restrictions on elbow/hand immediately
  • Lifting: No lifting over 5 lbs for 12 weeks
  • Driving: At 6-8 weeks if off narcotics and adequate ROM
  • Return to work: Sedentary at 4-6 weeks, manual labor 3-6 months
  • Contact sports: Avoid permanently (risk of dislocation or fracture)

Follow-Up Schedule

  • 2 weeks: Wound check, remove sutures/staples, assess ROM
  • 6 weeks: Radiographs (AP, axillary, scapular Y), progress to active ROM
  • 12 weeks: Clinical and radiographic assessment, full ROM expected
  • 6 months, 1 year, 2 years: Long-term surveillance for loosening, wear
  • Annual thereafter if asymptomatic

Outcomes and Prognosis

Outcome Measures and Functional Results

Anatomic vs Reverse TSA Outcomes

OutcomeAnatomic TSAReverse TSA
Pain reliefExcellent (90-95% significant improvement)Excellent (90-95% significant improvement)
Forward elevation140-160° (near-normal if cuff intact)120-140° (deltoid-dependent)
External rotation40-60° (requires intact posterior cuff)20-40° (limited by absent cuff)
Patient satisfaction90-95%90-95%
10-year survival70-90% (glenoid loosening main failure)85-95% (more durable glenoid fixation)

Predictors of Poor Outcome

Anatomic TSA: Unrecognized rotator cuff tear (leads to early failure), subscapularis failure (instability), glenoid loosening (excessive retroversion or eccentric loading). Reverse TSA: Deltoid dysfunction (axillary nerve injury), infection, scapular notching with pain, acromial fracture. Both: Periprosthetic infection, nerve injury, patient noncompliance with rehab.

Registry Data and Long-Term Survival

Australian Registry (AOANJRR) Data

  • Revision rate: 5-10% at 10 years for primary TSA
  • Reverse TSA: Lower revision rate than anatomic (3-7% at 10 years)
  • Common revision indications: Infection (30%), instability (20%), glenoid loosening (15%), rotator cuff failure (10%)
  • Reverse TSA growth: 60% of all shoulder arthroplasties in Australia (2023)

Functional Outcome Scores

  • ASES score: Improve from 30-40 preop to 75-85 postop
  • Constant score: Improve from 20-30 to 60-70
  • Pain VAS: Improve from 7-8/10 to 1-2/10
  • ROM: Forward elevation improve 50-80°, external rotation variable
  • Return to sport: 70-80% return to golf/swimming, avoid contact sports

Evidence Base and Key Trials

Neer Award 2006: Anatomic TSA Long-Term Outcomes

3
Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (2004)
Key Findings:
  • 223 anatomic TSAs followed for minimum 15 years
  • 75% survivorship at 20 years for all-polyethylene glenoid components
  • Glenoid loosening in 39% at 15 years (radiographic), 10% symptomatic requiring revision
  • Metal-backed glenoid components had significantly higher failure rates (abandoned)
Clinical Implication: All-polyethylene cemented glenoid components are gold standard for anatomic TSA. Long-term durability acceptable for appropriate indications. Glenoid loosening remains the weak link.
Limitation: Single-institution series, older implant designs, high loss to follow-up.

Reverse TSA for Cuff Tear Arthropathy: Multicenter Study

3
Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (2011)
Key Findings:
  • 527 reverse TSAs for cuff tear arthropathy followed mean 40 months
  • 90% good or excellent results (Constant score improvement from 23 to 65)
  • Scapular notching in 68% but only 5% symptomatic
  • Revision rate 6% at 5 years (infection 3%, instability 2%, loosening 1%)
Clinical Implication: Reverse TSA is highly effective for cuff tear arthropathy with predictable pain relief and functional improvement. Scapular notching common but usually asymptomatic.
Limitation: Multiple surgeons and implant designs, limited long-term follow-up beyond 5 years.

Lateralized vs Medialized Glenosphere Design in Reverse TSA

2
Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, Reddy KM, Marsh JP, Faber KJ, Drosdowech D • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Randomized trial: 62 patients, lateralized (Bony Increased-Offset) vs medialized glenosphere
  • Lateralized design improved external rotation (29° vs 18°, p less than 0.05)
  • Scapular notching reduced with lateralization (32% vs 58%, p less than 0.05)
  • No difference in forward elevation, ASES scores, or complications
Clinical Implication: Lateralized glenosphere designs improve external rotation and reduce scapular notching without increasing complications. Consider for patients requiring better external rotation function.
Limitation: Single-center RCT, short follow-up (2 years), specific implant design.

Subscapularis Management in Anatomic TSA: Osteotomy vs Tenotomy

3
Miller BS, Joseph TA, Noonan TJ, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (2005)
Key Findings:
  • 92 anatomic TSAs: 46 lesser tuberosity osteotomy, 46 subscapularis tenotomy
  • Osteotomy had lower subscapularis failure rate (2% vs 11%, p less than 0.05)
  • Better internal rotation strength with osteotomy (4.2 vs 3.1 kg, p less than 0.05)
  • No difference in ASES scores or patient satisfaction
Clinical Implication: Lesser tuberosity osteotomy provides more reliable subscapularis healing and strength compared to tenotomy. Consider osteotomy for optimal anatomic TSA stability and outcomes.
Limitation: Retrospective comparative study, single institution, subjective assessment of repair integrity.

Australian Registry (AOANJRR) Shoulder Arthroplasty Report

3
AOANJRR • Annual Report (2023)
Key Findings:
  • Reverse TSA now 60% of all shoulder arthroplasties in Australia (2023)
  • 10-year cumulative revision rate: 5.8% for anatomic TSA, 3.7% for reverse TSA
  • Most common revision indications: infection (30%), instability (20%), loosening (15%)
  • Cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components have lower revision rates than metal-backed
Clinical Implication: Reverse TSA has overtaken anatomic TSA in utilization. Registry data supports cemented all-polyethylene glenoid fixation and shows reverse TSA has lower revision rates than anatomic.
Limitation: Registry data subject to selection bias and incomplete capture of all complications.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Cuff Tear Arthropathy - Anatomic vs Reverse Decision (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 72-year-old retired teacher presents with 2-year history of progressive right shoulder pain and weakness. Unable to lift arm above shoulder height. Examination: forward elevation 70° active, 110° passive. Positive lag signs for supraspinatus and infraspinatus. XR shows superior migration of humeral head with acromiohumeral distance 4mm, glenohumeral joint space narrowing. MRI shows massive retracted rotator cuff tear with stage 3 Goutallier fatty infiltration of supraspinatus and infraspinatus. What is your diagnosis and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is cuff tear arthropathy - a 72-year-old with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, superior migration of humeral head (AHD 4mm), and glenohumeral osteoarthritis with stage 3 fatty infiltration indicating irreparable tear. My systematic approach: First, confirm diagnosis with history (progressive pain and weakness), examination (pseudoparalysis with lag signs, limited active elevation), and imaging (XR showing superior migration, MRI confirming massive tear with fatty infiltration). Second, I would assess patient factors: age, activity demands, deltoid function (essential for reverse TSA), medical comorbidities. Third, treatment: reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is indicated. This patient has classic indications: elderly (over 70), cuff tear arthropathy with massive irreparable tear, fatty infiltration stage 3, and pseudoparalysis. Reverse TSA provides reliable pain relief and functional improvement by converting to a deltoid-powered semiconstrained system. I would counsel about excellent outcomes (90% satisfaction, pain relief), improved forward elevation (120-140° expected), limited external rotation (20-40° due to absent posterior cuff), and complications including infection (1-2%), scapular notching (30-60% but usually asymptomatic), and nerve injury (1-3%). Rehabilitation involves early mobilization (safer than anatomic TSA), 3-6 week protection, then progressive deltoid strengthening.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic diagnosis: CTA with massive irreparable tear and fatty infiltration
Reverse TSA is gold standard for CTA in elderly patients
Deltoid function must be intact - axillary nerve injury is contraindication
Excellent pain relief and functional outcomes (90% satisfaction)
Limited external rotation expected (20-40°) due to absent posterior cuff
COMMON TRAPS
✗Suggesting anatomic TSA when cuff is irreparable with stage 3 fatty infiltration
✗Missing assessment of deltoid function (axillary nerve critical for reverse)
✗Not explaining biomechanics of reverse (semiconstrained, deltoid-powered)
✗Failing to counsel about limited external rotation postoperatively
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the Goutallier classification of fatty infiltration? (Stage 0-4, stage 3-4 irreparable)"
"What is scapular notching and how do you prevent it? (Inferior scapular impingement, prevent with lateralization, larger glenosphere, inferior tilt)"
"What if the patient has axillary nerve palsy? (Absolute contraindication - reverse TSA requires functioning deltoid)"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Glenoid Version Correction in Anatomic TSA (3-4 min)

EXAMINER

"You are planning an anatomic TSA for a 65-year-old with primary glenohumeral OA. Preoperative CT shows Walch B2 glenoid morphology with 18° of retroversion and biconcave wear pattern. MRI confirms intact rotator cuff. Walk me through your approach to managing this glenoid morphology."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a Walch B2 glenoid with 18° retroversion requiring version correction during anatomic TSA. My approach: First, preoperative planning with 3D CT reconstruction to assess exact retroversion, bone stock, and subluxation. B2 glenoid has biconcave morphology with posterior wear and retroversion 15-25° - requires correction to avoid eccentric loading and early glenoid loosening. Second, surgical options for version correction: Option A is eccentric reaming (safe up to 10° correction) - ream posterior high, anterior low to correct version. However, 18° exceeds safe eccentric reaming limit (max 10°) - excessive reaming risks glenoid medialization, bone loss, and fracture. Option B is posterior bone grafting with humeral head autograft - prepare glenoid with 10° eccentric reaming, harvest humeral head bone graft, shape to wedge, secure with screws, cement glenoid component onto graft after incorporation (6-12 weeks). Option C is augmented glenoid component with posterior wedge built into polyethylene - immediate correction, no graft, but limited availability. My preferred approach for this patient: augmented component if available, otherwise posterior bone grafting with staged procedure (graft first, implant at 3 months). Third, intraoperative technique: expose glenoid via deltopectoral, remove labrum 360°, eccentric ream to correct 10°, apply posterior bone graft for remaining 8°, provisional fixation with screws, cement standard or augmented glenoid component. Fourth, I would counsel about: good outcomes expected with version correction, slightly higher complication risk (graft nonunion 5-10%, fracture risk), longer rehab if staged, and alternative of reverse TSA if patient older or lower demand.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Walch B2 glenoid has 15-25° retroversion requiring correction
Eccentric reaming safe up to 10° only - 18° exceeds safe limit
Options: eccentric reaming plus bone graft, augmented component, or reverse TSA
Posterior bone graft (humeral head autograft) is classic technique for severe retroversion
Uncorrected retroversion leads to eccentric loading and early glenoid failure
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting to correct 18° with eccentric reaming alone (unsafe, risks medialization and fracture)
✗Not knowing Walch classification (B2 = biconcave, 15-25° retroversion)
✗Failing to mention augmented components as alternative to bone grafting
✗Not discussing risk-benefit with patient (higher complexity, could consider reverse TSA)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is maximum safe eccentric reaming? (10° - beyond this risks medialization and fracture)"
"Describe humeral head bone graft harvest and application. (Resect humeral head, shape to posterior wedge, secure with 1-2 screws, cement component after 3-6 months)"
"What if patient is 75 years old with same glenoid? (Consider reverse TSA - simpler, no need for perfect version correction, deltoid-powered)"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Periprosthetic Infection Management (2-3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 68-year-old presents 6 months after anatomic TSA with 3 weeks of increasing shoulder pain, swelling, and low-grade fever. Wound healed primarily. Exam shows warmth, effusion, painful ROM. ESR 65, CRP 45. Aspiration grows coagulase-negative Staph. How do you manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a chronic periprosthetic shoulder infection presenting 6 months postoperatively with 3 weeks of symptoms, elevated inflammatory markers (ESR 65, CRP 45), and positive aspiration (coag-negative Staph). My immediate management: First, assess severity - 3 weeks of symptoms with positive culture indicates chronic infection (over 4 weeks from symptom onset or over 3 weeks from initial surgery). Acute infections (under 3-4 weeks, well-fixed components) may respond to I and D with component retention, but this presentation is chronic. Second, staged revision is gold standard for chronic periprosthetic shoulder infection: Stage 1 involves component removal, extensive debridement of all infected tissue and cement, obtain 5-6 tissue cultures intraoperatively, place antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (vancomycin and tobramycin typically), close and begin IV antibiotics based on sensitivities (6-12 weeks total). Stage 2 occurs at 3-6 months after inflammatory markers normalize and aspiration is culture-negative - reimplantation with new components (likely reverse TSA given bone loss and soft tissue damage). Third, I would involve infectious disease for antibiotic selection and duration. Coag-negative Staph typically requires vancomycin or cephalosporin. Monitor ESR/CRP normalization before reimplantation. Fourth, counsel patient about: two-stage process requiring 6-12 months total, 80-90% infection eradication rate with staged revision, functional outcome typically worse than primary TSA (limited by soft tissue damage), possibility of permanent spacer if cannot eradicate (15-20% of cases), and need for long-term surveillance.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Chronic infection (over 4 weeks or late presentation) requires staged revision
Stage 1: component removal, debridement, spacer placement, IV antibiotics 6-12 weeks
Stage 2: reimplantation at 3-6 months after markers normalize and negative aspiration
Success rate 80-90% for two-stage revision, superior to I&D with retention for chronic
Involve infectious disease, obtain multiple intraoperative cultures for sensitivities
COMMON TRAPS
✗Attempting I&D with component retention for chronic infection (low success rate 30-50%)
✗Not differentiating acute vs chronic infection (timing dictates treatment)
✗Forgetting antibiotic spacer placement (maintains soft tissue tension, local antibiotics)
✗Not discussing possibility of permanent spacer or resection arthroplasty if cannot eradicate
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What defines acute vs chronic periprosthetic infection? (Acute: under 3-4 weeks from symptom onset with well-fixed components; Chronic: over 4 weeks or late presentation)"
"What antibiotics are in the spacer? (Typically vancomycin 4-6g and tobramycin 3-4g per batch of cement)"
"What if cultures are negative but high clinical suspicion? (Treat as culture-negative PJI - broad-spectrum antibiotics, biofilm consideration, extended culture time, consider sonication)"

MCQ Practice Points

Glenoid Morphology Question

Q: What is the Walch classification system for glenoid morphology in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis? A: Walch classification assesses glenoid wear pattern and version to guide component selection. A1: Minor concentric erosion, normal version (best candidate for standard component). A2: Major concentric erosion (may need thicker component). B1: Posterior subluxation with asymmetric wear, 10-15° retroversion (eccentric reaming up to 10° safe). B2: Biconcave glenoid with severe posterior wear, 15-25° retroversion (requires bone graft or augmented component). C: Dysplastic with over 25° retroversion (bone graft mandatory or consider reverse TSA).

Reverse TSA Biomechanics Question

Q: What are the key biomechanical principles of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A: Reverse TSA creates a semiconstrained ball-and-socket design with inverted anatomy (glenosphere on glenoid, concave cup on humerus). Medialized center of rotation increases deltoid tension and moment arm, allowing elevation despite absent rotator cuff. Deltoid becomes prime mover replacing cuff function. Design is inherently stable without requiring cuff balance. Lateralization (lateralized glenosphere or humeral offset) reduces scapular notching and improves external rotation. Functioning deltoid (axillary nerve intact) is essential - deltoid paralysis is absolute contraindication.

Glenoid Component Fixation Question

Q: What is the preferred glenoid component design for anatomic TSA and why? A: All-polyethylene cemented glenoid components are gold standard with 70-90% survivorship at 10-20 years. Metal-backed glenoid components have significantly higher failure rates due to polyethylene dissociation, increased wear from thin polyethylene, and osteolysis - they are no longer recommended. Cemented fixation with keel or pegged designs provides durable fixation. Keel designs easier to insert, pegged designs may offer better cement interdigitation. Pressurization of cement into cancellous bone is critical for fixation strength.

Subscapularis Management Question

Q: Compare lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic TSA. A: Lesser tuberosity osteotomy: Preserves subscapularis insertion on bone fragment, allows bone-to-bone healing (6-8 weeks), lower failure rate (under 5%), better strength restoration. More technically demanding, risk of fracture or nonunion. Subscapularis tenotomy: 5mm medial to insertion, faster, easier exposure and repair. Tendon-to-bone healing (variable), higher failure rate (5-10%), longer protection (12 weeks). Subscapularis failure leads to anterior instability and poor outcomes after anatomic TSA, making secure repair critical.

Complications Question

Q: What is the most common long-term complication of anatomic TSA and how is it managed? A: Glenoid loosening occurs in 10-25% of patients at 10 years (radiographic), with 5-10% requiring revision. Caused by eccentric loading, excessive retroversion, poor cementation, or component malposition. Presents with recurrent pain and functional decline. Management: Observation if asymptomatic with stable component, revision to new glenoid component if symptomatic and bone stock adequate, conversion to reverse TSA if bone loss or rotator cuff failure develops. Prevention through proper version correction, cemented all-polyethylene components, and balanced soft tissues.

Registry Data Question

Q: What are the key findings from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) regarding shoulder arthroplasty? A: AOANJRR 2023 data shows: Reverse TSA now exceeds anatomic TSA (60% vs 40% of all shoulder arthroplasties in Australia). 10-year cumulative revision rate: 5.8% for anatomic TSA, 3.7% for reverse TSA (reverse more durable). Most common revision indications: Infection (30%), instability (20%), glenoid loosening (15%), rotator cuff failure (10%). Cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components have lower revision rates than metal-backed or uncemented designs. Registry data guides implant selection and patient counseling.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

AOANJRR Data and Guidelines

  • 60% of shoulder arthroplasties in Australia are now reverse TSA (2023)
  • 10-year revision rate: 3.7% reverse, 5.8% anatomic TSA
  • Preferred glenoid: All-polyethylene cemented components
  • Growth: 35% annual increase in reverse TSA over past decade
  • Registry participation: Mandatory for quality improvement

Australian Consent and Documentation

  • Informed consent must include: Infection risk (1-2%), nerve injury (1-3%), glenoid loosening (10-25% at 10 years for anatomic), instability (2-5%), need for revision (5-10% at 10 years)
  • Document: Rotator cuff integrity (preoperative MRI), glenoid morphology (Walch classification on CT), component selection rationale
  • PBS coverage: TSA components covered for approved indications (OA, CTA, fracture)
  • Funding: TSA procedures covered under public system; private patients should check with insurer for gap payments

Medicolegal Considerations for TSA

Key documentation requirements: Preoperative imaging assessment (XR, CT with version measurement, MRI for cuff assessment), informed consent with specific complications discussed (infection, nerve injury, loosening, instability, limited ROM especially external rotation in reverse), component selection rationale (anatomic vs reverse, glenoid design, version correction strategy), intraoperative findings (cuff integrity, bone quality, component positioning), postoperative instructions (sling compliance, ROM restrictions, PT protocol). Common litigation issues: Unrecognized rotator cuff tear leading to early anatomic TSA failure (failure to obtain MRI preoperatively), nerve injury from excessive retraction, infection from inadequate prophylaxis or contamination, subscapularis failure from inadequate repair or early mobilization, wrong implant selection (anatomic when reverse indicated). Protective measures: Thorough preoperative assessment with appropriate imaging, detailed consent process, meticulous surgical technique with nerve protection, careful component selection based on cuff integrity and glenoid morphology, clear postoperative instructions and compliance monitoring.

TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Decision Points

  • •Rotator cuff integrity determines anatomic (intact cuff) vs reverse TSA (cuff deficiency)
  • •Walch B2/C glenoid (retroversion over 15°) requires bone graft or augmented component
  • •Deltoid must be intact for reverse TSA - axillary nerve palsy is absolute contraindication
  • •All-polyethylene cemented glenoid is gold standard (metal-backed abandoned)

Walch Glenoid Classification

  • •A1 = minor concentric erosion, normal version (best candidate)
  • •A2 = major concentric erosion (thicker component)
  • •B1 = posterior subluxation 10-15° retroversion (eccentric reaming safe)
  • •B2 = biconcave 15-25° retroversion (bone graft or augment needed)
  • •C = dysplastic over 25° retroversion (graft mandatory or reverse TSA)

Surgical Approach Pearls

  • •Deltopectoral approach: retract cephalic vein laterally with deltoid
  • •Axillary nerve 5-10mm from glenoid rim at 6 o'clock - protect during capsular release
  • •Lesser tuberosity osteotomy has lower failure rate (under 5%) vs tenotomy (5-10%)
  • •Eccentric reaming safe to 10° correction - beyond requires bone graft or augment

Reverse TSA Specifics

  • •Semiconstrained design with medialized center of rotation - deltoid powered
  • •Lateralized glenosphere reduces scapular notching (30-60% incidence)
  • •External rotation limited 20-40° due to absent posterior cuff - counsel preop
  • •Earlier mobilization safe than anatomic (no cuff repair to protect)

Complications and Management

  • •Glenoid loosening (10-25% at 10 years anatomic) - observation vs revision to reverse
  • •Periprosthetic infection (1-2%): acute (under 4 weeks) = I&D, chronic = staged revision
  • •Subscapularis failure (5-10%) leads to instability - lesser tuberosity osteotomy preferred
  • •Scapular notching (30-60% reverse TSA) usually asymptomatic - prevent with lateralization

Key Evidence and Outcomes

  • •10-year survival: 70-90% anatomic TSA, 85-95% reverse TSA
  • •90-95% patient satisfaction and pain relief for both types
  • •Reverse TSA now 60% of all shoulder arthroplasties in Australia (AOANJRR 2023)
  • •Lateralized glenosphere improves external rotation and reduces notching (Athwal RCT)
Quick Stats
Reading Time161 min
🇦🇺

FRACS Guidelines

Australia & New Zealand
  • AOANJRR Shoulder Registry
  • MBS Shoulder Items
Related Topics

Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Shoulder Arthroplasty Anatomy

Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications

Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty