Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Hip Labral Tears

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Hip Labral Tears

Comprehensive guide to hip labral tears diagnosis and management for FRCS exam preparation

complete
Updated: 2025-12-25
High Yield Overview

HIP LABRAL TEARS

Anterosuperior Most Common | Associated with FAI

ASAnterosuperior location (most common)
FAIAssociated morphology
MRABest imaging modality
RepairPreferred over debridement

Tear Locations

Anterosuperior
PatternMost common (85%)
TreatmentUsually FAI-related
Posterior
PatternLess common
TreatmentDysplasia or trauma
Circumferential
Pattern360 degrees
TreatmentSevere FAI or dysplasia

Critical Must-Knows

  • Anterosuperior location most common (85%), usually FAI-related
  • Labrum seals hip joint and distributes load
  • FADIR test reproduces pain (anterior impingement)
  • MR arthrogram is gold standard imaging
  • Labral repair superior to debridement for outcomes

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Labrum increases acetabular depth 22% and surface area 28%
  • "
    Contains free nerve endings - important for proprioception
  • "
    Cam FAI causes outside-in delamination at labral-chondral junction
  • "
    Address underlying cause (FAI, dysplasia) with labral surgery

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Axial MRI arthrogram of left hip demonstrating acetabular labral tear
Click to expand
Axial MRI arthrogram of left hip demonstrating acetabular labral tearCredit: Unknown via Open-i (NIH) - PMC4849255 (CC-BY)

Critical Hip Labral Tear Exam Points

Function

Labrum functions: Seals joint (suction seal), stabilizes femoral head, distributes load, increases depth (22%) and surface area (28%). Contains proprioceptive nerve endings.

Location

Anterosuperior (85%): Usually FAI-related. Posterior: Dysplasia or trauma-related. Location guides surgical approach and prognosis.

Associated Pathology

Must identify underlying cause: FAI (cam/pincer), dysplasia, instability. Treating labrum alone without addressing morphology leads to failure.

Repair vs Debridement

Labral repair preferred over debridement. Multiple studies show better outcomes with repair. Preserves sealing function and proprioception.

At a Glance

Hip labral tears predominantly occur in the anterosuperior location (85%) and are most commonly associated with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)—cam morphology causes outside-in delamination at the labral-chondral junction. The acetabular labrum serves critical functions: it increases acetabular depth by 22% and surface area by 28%, creates a suction seal to contain joint fluid, and provides proprioceptive feedback through free nerve endings. Clinical diagnosis relies on the FADIR test (flexion, adduction, internal rotation reproducing anterior impingement pain), with MR arthrography serving as the gold standard imaging modality. Surgical management favors labral repair over debridement, as multiple studies demonstrate superior functional outcomes when the labrum is preserved. Critically, underlying morphologic abnormalities (FAI, dysplasia) must be addressed concurrently—treating the labral tear in isolation without correcting the bony pathology leads to predictable failure.

Mnemonic

SSSDLabral Function

S
Seal (suction seal)
Contains joint fluid
S
Stabilize
Keeps femoral head in socket
S
Surface area increase
28% increase
D
Depth increase
22% increase

Memory Hook:SSSD = Seal, Stabilize, Surface area, Depth - labral functions!

Mnemonic

FAD-TLabral Tear Causes

F
FAI (cam/pincer)
Most common cause
A
Acetabular dysplasia
Instability/shear
D
Degeneration
Age-related
T
Trauma
Dislocation, torsion

Memory Hook:FAD-T = FAI, Acetabular dysplasia, Degeneration, Trauma!

Overview and Anatomy

The acetabular labrum is a fibrocartilaginous structure attached to the rim of the acetabulum. It extends the coverage of the femoral head, increases joint stability, and contributes to the sealing function of the hip joint.

Anatomy

The labrum is triangular in cross-section, attached to the acetabular rim. It is continuous with the transverse acetabular ligament inferiorly. Blood supply is from the capsular side (peripheral). The labrum contains free nerve endings and is important for proprioception.

Function

The labrum creates a suction seal maintaining negative intra-articular pressure. It increases acetabular depth by approximately 22% and surface area by approximately 28%. Labral damage compromises this seal and alters joint mechanics.

Clinical Presentation

History

Patients present with groin pain (most common), though may also describe anterior thigh, buttock, or lateral hip pain. Pain is typically activity-related and may be accompanied by mechanical symptoms (clicking, catching, locking). Prolonged sitting may aggravate symptoms. Athletes often report difficulty with sport-specific activities.

Examination

FADIR Test (Anterior Impingement Test): Flexion, Adduction, Internal Rotation reproduces groin pain. Most sensitive clinical test.

FABER Test: Flexion, Abduction, External Rotation may reproduce pain or indicate SI pathology.

Range of Motion: May be reduced, particularly internal rotation in flexion if FAI is present.

Gait: Usually normal unless significant pain or associated pathology.

Log Roll: May reproduce pain with minimal stress on the hip.

Diagnosis

Plain Radiographs: Assess for underlying morphology (FAI, dysplasia, osteoarthritis). AP pelvis, lateral hip. Measure alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle.

MRI: Shows labral pathology. Standard MRI may miss some tears.

MR Arthrogram (MRA): Gold standard. Intra-articular gadolinium improves sensitivity and specificity for labral tears. Shows tear location, size, and associated cartilage damage.

Axial MRI arthrogram of the hip demonstrating labral anatomy
Click to expand
Axial MRI arthrogram of the left hip. Intra-articular gadolinium contrast (bright signal) outlines the acetabular labrum, allowing assessment of labral integrity, tears, and chondrolabral junction. MRA is the gold standard imaging modality for labral pathology.Credit: Shetty VD et al., SICOT J (PMC4849255) - CC BY

CT: For detailed bony morphology assessment if planning surgery.

By Location:

  • Anterosuperior (85%): Zone 1-2, usually FAI-related
  • Posterior (10-15%): Zone 4-5, dysplasia or trauma
  • Circumferential: Extensive damage

By Type:

  • Radial tear
  • Longitudinal tear
  • Degeneration
  • Detachment

Seldes Classification (Histological):

  • Type 1: Detachment at chondrolabral junction
  • Type 2: Cleavage plane within labral substance

Management

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Labral Tears Hip
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Labral Tears HipCredit: OrthoVellum

Activity Modification: Avoid provocative positions and activities.

Physiotherapy: Hip stability, core strengthening, range of motion exercises.

Analgesia/NSAIDs: Symptomatic relief.

Intra-articular Injection: Local anesthetic/corticosteroid. Diagnostic (confirms hip as source) and therapeutic (temporary relief).

Conservative treatment may provide symptomatic relief but does not heal labral tears.

Indications: Symptomatic labral tear confirmed on MRA, failed conservative treatment, identifiable underlying cause to be addressed.

Labral Repair vs Debridement: Repair is preferred. Multiple studies show better outcomes with repair compared to debridement. Repair preserves labral function and proprioception.

Techniques:

  • Hip Arthroscopy: Most common approach. Access central and peripheral compartments.
  • Repair: Suture anchors to reattach labrum to rim.
  • Debridement: Reserved for irreparable tissue.
  • Reconstruction: For severe damage, labral reconstruction with graft.

Address Underlying Cause: Essential. Femoral osteochondroplasty for cam, rim trimming for pincer, periacetabular osteotomy for dysplasia.

Outcomes: Good to excellent in appropriately selected patients. Poor prognostic factors include advanced cartilage damage, inadequate correction of morphology.

Evidence Base

II
📚 Ferguson et al
Key Findings:
  • Labrum contributes 22% of acetabular depth
  • Labrum increases surface area 28%
  • Sealing function demonstrated
  • Foundation for understanding labral importance
Clinical Implication: Supports labral preservation and repair.
Source: J Orthop Res 2003

III
📚 Larson and Giveans
Key Findings:
  • Labral repair vs debridement comparison
  • Repair group had better outcomes
  • Higher satisfaction with repair
  • Lower re-operation rate
Clinical Implication: Supports repair over debridement when possible.
Source: Arthroscopy 2009

IV
📚 Philippon et al
Key Findings:
  • Hip arthroscopy outcomes for labral tears
  • Good results in athletes
  • High return to sport rate
  • Patient selection important
Clinical Implication: Hip arthroscopy effective for labral tears in athletes.
Source: Am J Sports Med 2009

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Hip Labral Tear

EXAMINER

"A 30-year-old woman with groin pain has an anterosuperior labral tear on MR arthrogram. How do you manage her?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has an anterosuperior labral tear which is the most common location, typically associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Before planning treatment, I need to assess the underlying cause. My history would establish symptoms, activity level, and impact on function. On examination, I would perform FADIR test (likely positive with anterior impingement), assess range of motion, and check for other sources of groin pain. I would review her imaging for associated morphology. On radiographs, I would measure alpha angle for cam (greater than 55°) and lateral center-edge angle for acetabular coverage. On MRA, I would assess the extent of labral damage and any cartilage damage. If conservative treatment (physiotherapy, activity modification, possible injection) has failed and she has correctable morphology, I would recommend hip arthroscopy. The key principle is that labral repair is superior to debridement and must be accompanied by treatment of the underlying cause. I would perform labral repair with suture anchors and address the FAI morphology with femoral osteochondroplasty for cam and/or rim trimming for pincer. Treating the labrum alone without addressing FAI leads to recurrence. Outcomes are good in patients with preserved joint space. Poor prognostic factors include significant cartilage damage and incomplete correction of morphology.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Anterosuperior = usually FAI-related
Must address underlying cause (FAI, dysplasia)
Repair superior to debridement
Incomplete correction leads to failure
COMMON TRAPS
✗Treating labrum without addressing FAI
✗Debriding repairable labrum
✗Not assessing bony morphology
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the function of the labrum?"
"Why is repair preferred over debridement?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Posterior Labral Tear with Hip Dysplasia - Complex Decision-Making

EXAMINER

"You are seeing a 24-year-old recreational runner with a 12-month history of deep buttock and posterior hip pain. She describes a sensation of hip instability, particularly when walking on uneven ground, and occasional painful clicking. Her FADIR test is negative, but she has a positive posterior rim impingement test and apprehension with external rotation in extension. Plain X-rays show a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18° (normal greater than 25°), Tonnis angle 15° (normal less than 10°), and no cam morphology (alpha angle 42°). MR arthrogram demonstrates a posterior labral tear (zone 4-5) with adjacent chondral thinning (Outerbridge grade II) and anterior subluxation of the femoral head on dynamic imaging. How do you counsel this patient about management options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient presents with a **posterior labral tear** in the setting of **hip dysplasia** (LCEA 18°, Tonnis angle 15°) - a completely different pathomechanical scenario from the typical anterosuperior FAI-related tear. The critical distinction is that **posterior tears are usually due to instability and shear forces** from acetabular undercoverage, whereas anterosuperior tears result from impingement. The treatment challenge is that **addressing the labral tear alone will fail** unless the underlying dysplasia is corrected. I would counsel as follows: **Pathomechanics - Dysplasia-Related Labral Pathology:** **Hip dysplasia creates instability**: LCEA 18° indicates **borderline dysplasia** (mild: 20-25°, moderate: 15-20°, severe: less than 15°). Tonnis angle 15° confirms steep acetabular inclination (normal less than 10°, dysplasia greater than 10°). **Consequences of undercoverage**: (1) Increased edge loading on posterior labrum, (2) Shear forces during dynamic activities, (3) Anterior subluxation tendency (seen on this patient's dynamic MRI), (4) Progressive labral and cartilage degeneration. **Location significance**: Posterior tears (zone 4-5) in 10-15% of cases, almost always associated with dysplasia or trauma (hip dislocation), NOT FAI. **Assessment of Dysplasia Severity:** **Radiographic parameters critical**: LCEA 18° (borderline), Tonnis angle 15° (increased), acetabular index, femoral head extrusion index, presence of os acetabuli. **Functional assessment**: Apprehension test positive suggests instability is symptomatic, clicking suggests unstable labrum. **Cartilage status**: Outerbridge II acetabular thinning is **critical prognostic factor** - advanced cartilage damage (III-IV) predicts poor outcomes from corrective osteotomy. **Management Options - Joint Preservation vs Isolated Labral Surgery:** **Option 1: Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) + Labral Repair** (Preferred if patient suitable): **Rationale**: Corrects underlying instability AND addresses labral pathology. **PAO technique**: Bernese PAO rotates acetabulum to improve coverage (aim LCEA 30-35°, Tonnis angle less than 5°), performed through Smith-Petersen approach or modified Stoppa. **Combined with arthroscopy**: Many surgeons perform hip arthroscopy immediately before or after PAO to address labral tear with repair (suture anchors). **Outcomes**: 70-80% good-excellent results at 10 years in patients with Outerbridge 0-II cartilage, 60-70% avoid THA at 20 years if performed before advanced cartilage damage. **Age considerations**: This patient age 24 ideal for PAO (younger patients better outcomes, ceiling age ~40 years). **Risks**: Major surgery, blood loss, prolonged recovery (6-9 months), TTWB 6-8 weeks, potential complications (heterotopic ossification, nerve injury, non-union, over-correction). **Option 2: Isolated Hip Arthroscopy with Labral Repair** (NOT recommended in this case): **Why not appropriate**: Repairing posterior labral tear without correcting dysplasia exposes repaired labrum to ongoing shear forces and edge loading. **Predictable failure**: High re-tear rate, persistent instability symptoms, progression of cartilage damage. **Only consider if**: Patient declines PAO, minimal dysplasia (LCEA 20-25°), low-demand activities. This patient has LCEA 18° and active runner - isolated arthroscopy will fail. **Option 3: Conservative Management:** **Trial before surgery**: 6 months physiotherapy (focus on hip stabilizers - gluteus medius/minimus strengthening, proprioception), activity modification (avoid running on uneven ground, reduce impact activities), NSAIDs. **Diagnostic injection**: Intra-articular local anesthetic/corticosteroid confirms hip as pain source and provides temporary relief, aids surgical decision-making. **Limitations**: Conservative treatment does not correct structural instability, unlikely to provide long-term relief in active 24-year-old. **Recommended Management for This Patient:** Given age 24, recreational activity demands, borderline dysplasia (LCEA 18°, Tonnis 15°), posterior labral tear, and Outerbridge II cartilage (favorable), I would recommend **PAO with concurrent or staged labral repair**. Explain this is major surgery but offers best chance of joint preservation and return to activities. Alternative of isolated labral repair will fail due to persistent instability. If patient declines PAO, trial of conservative management with understanding that symptoms likely to recur and cartilage damage may progress.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Posterior labral tears (zone 4-5) usually dysplasia or trauma-related, NOT FAI: 10-15% of labral tears, associated with acetabular undercoverage and instability, shear forces cause edge loading on posterior labrum, anterior subluxation tendency on dynamic imaging
Hip dysplasia radiographic assessment critical: LCEA 18° = borderline dysplasia (mild 20-25°, moderate 15-20°, severe less than 15°), Tonnis angle 15° confirms steep inclination (normal less than 10°), assess for additional parameters (acetabular index, head extrusion, os acetabuli)
Isolated labral repair will fail in dysplasia - must correct underlying instability: Repairing labrum without PAO exposes repair to ongoing shear forces and edge loading, high re-tear rate, persistent instability, progressive cartilage damage - treating labrum alone is inadequate
PAO + labral repair is gold standard for symptomatic dysplasia with labral tear: Bernese PAO rotates acetabulum to improve coverage (target LCEA 30-35°, Tonnis less than 5°), combined with arthroscopic labral repair, 70-80% good-excellent results at 10 years if Outerbridge 0-II, 60-70% avoid THA at 20 years
Cartilage status critical prognostic factor: Outerbridge II (this patient) favorable for PAO, Outerbridge III-IV poor outcomes from PAO (consider THA), age less than 40 and LCEA 15-25° ideal candidates, ceiling age ~40 years for PAO
COMMON TRAPS
✗Assuming all labral tears are FAI-related - posterior tears almost always dysplasia or trauma, different pathomechanics require different treatment
✗Isolated labral repair in dysplasia setting - will fail due to persistent instability and shear forces, must address underlying bony morphology
✗Not recognizing LCEA 18° as dysplasia - anything less than 20° is abnormal, less than 25° borderline, requires assessment for PAO candidacy
✗Offering PAO to patient with advanced cartilage damage (Outerbridge III-IV) - poor prognostic factor, likely to progress to THA despite correction
✗Not counseling about major surgery involved in PAO - prolonged recovery 6-9 months, TTWB 6-8 weeks, significant risks but best option for joint preservation in young patient
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What LCEA values define hip dysplasia severity?"
"What are the outcomes of PAO in appropriately selected patients?"
"Why does isolated labral repair fail in dysplasia?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Failed Labral Repair - Recurrent Symptoms and Revision Decision-Making

EXAMINER

"You are seeing a 32-year-old man who underwent right hip arthroscopy with labral repair and cam osteochondroplasty 14 months ago. He initially improved for 4-5 months post-operatively but has had gradual recurrence of groin pain over the past 6 months. He now has similar symptoms to pre-operatively: groin pain with prolonged sitting, FADIR test positive, reduced internal rotation (15° vs 25° on left). You obtain his pre-operative imaging which shows an alpha angle of 72° with an anterosuperior labral tear. His new plain X-rays show the joint space is preserved (3mm), no progression of osteoarthritis (Tonnis 0), but the post-operative alpha angle measures 58° (inadequate correction - should be less than 50°). A new MR arthrogram shows re-tear of the repaired labrum at the same anterosuperior location with contrast extravasation, and Outerbridge grade II cartilage in the anterosuperior acetabulum (unchanged from pre-op). The patient is frustrated and asking about revision surgery. How do you assess this patient and what are the management options?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a case of **failed labral repair** with **recurrent symptoms 14 months post-operatively** due to **inadequate correction of cam morphology** - a technical failure that has led to labral re-tear. The critical finding is the **post-operative alpha angle of 58°** (goal less than 50° after osteochondroplasty) indicating **residual cam impingement** that has caused the repaired labrum to re-tear. This is a **surgically correctable cause of failure** and the patient is likely a candidate for **revision hip arthroscopy** given preserved joint space and stable Outerbridge II cartilage. I would assess and counsel as follows: **Assessment of Failed Labral Repair:** **Determine cause of failure** - systematic approach: (1) **Inadequate bony correction** (this patient - alpha 58°, should be less than 50°), (2) Technical failure of repair (suture anchor pullout, labral tissue failure), (3) Unrecognized pathology (missed cartilage damage, dysplasia), (4) Disease progression (cartilage deterioration). **In this case**: Pre-op alpha 72° reduced to 58° post-op represents **incomplete femoral osteochondroplasty** - residual cam bump continues to impinge on anterosuperior labrum causing re-tear. This is **surgeon technical error**, not patient disease progression. **Review Imaging Systematically:** **Plain radiographs**: Post-op alpha angle 58° (inadequate - goal less than 50° to eliminate impingement), joint space preserved 3mm (favorable), Tonnis 0 (no OA progression - good prognostic factor for revision), check for heterotopic ossification. **MR arthrogram**: Re-tear at same anterosuperior location (confirms ongoing impingement at same site), contrast extravasation indicates unstable labrum, Outerbridge II unchanged (stable cartilage - favorable for revision). **Compare to pre-operative imaging**: Pre-op alpha 72° vs post-op 58° = only 14° correction (insufficient), typical adequate osteochondroplasty achieves 20-30° reduction to reach alpha less than 50°. **Prognostic Factors for Revision Surgery:** **Favorable factors** (this patient has most): (1) Identifiable correctable cause (residual cam), (2) Preserved joint space (3mm), (3) Stable cartilage (Outerbridge II, no progression), (4) Young age (32 years), (5) Reasonable timeframe (14 months - not rapid progression suggesting aggressive disease). **Unfavorable factors** (assess for): Advanced cartilage progression (Outerbridge III-IV), significant joint space narrowing, dysplasia, multiple previous surgeries, unrealistic expectations, workers' compensation. **Management Options:** **Option 1: Revision Hip Arthroscopy** (Recommended): **Rationale**: Correctable technical error with favorable prognostic factors. **Surgical plan**: (1) Complete femoral osteochondroplasty to reduce alpha angle to less than 50° (remove additional 8-10° of cam), (2) Assess labral tissue - if good quality perform **revision labral repair** with suture anchors, (3) Debride unstable cartilage flaps if present, (4) Capsular closure. **Technical considerations**: Revision arthroscopy more challenging than primary - scar tissue, altered anatomy, capsular adhesions, need adequate visualization. **Outcomes of revision arthroscopy**: 60-70% good outcomes if correctable cause identified and addressed (vs 75-85% primary arthroscopy), higher complication rate 3-5% vs 1-2% primary. **Risks**: Iatrogenic cartilage damage, femoral neck fracture (if over-aggressive osteochondroplasty), traction injury, infection. **Option 2: Labral Reconstruction** (If labral tissue poor quality): **Indication**: If at arthroscopy the labral remnant is insufficient for repair (degenerate, retracted, scarred). **Technique**: Reconstruct labrum using allograft (typically iliotibial band or tensor fascia lata), secure with suture anchors to rim. **Outcomes**: Emerging evidence suggests good results, but technically demanding, longer surgery time, graft incorporation required. **Must still correct residual cam** - reconstruction alone without addressing alpha 58° will fail. **Option 3: Conservative Management:** **Trial before revision**: 3-6 months physiotherapy (hip stabilization, ROM), activity modification, NSAIDs, intra-articular corticosteroid injection (may provide temporary relief 3-6 months, diagnostic to confirm hip as pain source). **Limitations**: Does not address mechanical problem (residual cam impingement), symptoms likely to recur, cartilage may progress over time. **Consider if**: Patient declines revision surgery, low-demand lifestyle, minimal symptoms. **Recommended Management:** I would recommend **revision hip arthroscopy** with completion of cam osteochondroplasty (reduce alpha to less than 50°) and revision labral repair or reconstruction. Explain this is a **correctable technical issue** from incomplete first surgery - the residual cam bump is causing recurrent impingement and labral damage. Favorable prognostic factors (age 32, preserved joint space, stable cartilage) support revision. Realistic counseling: 60-70% good outcomes, surgery more complex than primary, 3-6 months recovery. If patient declines revision, trial of conservative management with understanding symptoms likely to persist. **Patient Communication:** Address frustration with empathy: (1) Explain the cause - incomplete removal of cam bump in first surgery (technical issue, not patient factors), (2) This is correctable with revision to properly reshape femoral head-neck junction, (3) Preserved cartilage and joint space are favorable signs, (4) Revision has good success rate when correctable cause identified, (5) Alternative is conservative management but mechanical problem will persist.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Failed labral repair - systematic assessment of cause: (1) Inadequate bony correction (residual cam/pincer, dysplasia not addressed), (2) Technical failure (anchor pullout, labral failure), (3) Unrecognized pathology, (4) Disease progression (cartilage deterioration); This case = inadequate cam correction (alpha 58° post-op, goal less than 50°)
Post-operative alpha angle critical quality indicator: Adequate cam osteochondroplasty reduces alpha to less than 50°, typical correction 20-30° reduction from baseline, this patient only 14° correction (72°→58°) = incomplete surgery, residual cam continues to impinge causing labral re-tear
Favorable prognostic factors for revision arthroscopy: Identifiable correctable cause, preserved joint space, stable cartilage (no progression to Outerbridge III-IV), young age less than 40, single previous surgery, realistic expectations; This patient has most favorable factors
Revision arthroscopy outcomes: 60-70% good outcomes if correctable cause addressed (lower than 75-85% primary arthroscopy), higher complication rate 3-5% vs 1-2%, technically more challenging (scar tissue, altered anatomy, capsular adhesions), must complete adequate cam resection (reduce alpha less than 50°)
Labral reconstruction option if tissue inadequate: Use allograft (ITB or TFL) if native labral remnant insufficient for repair, technically demanding procedure, emerging evidence supports outcomes, must still correct residual cam morphology
COMMON TRAPS
✗Not measuring post-operative alpha angle - critical to assess adequacy of cam correction, incomplete osteochondroplasty (alpha greater than 50°) is common technical error causing re-tear
✗Assuming all failed repairs are due to disease progression - must systematically assess for correctable causes (inadequate bony correction most common), this case is technical failure not patient factors
✗Offering revision without correcting residual cam (alpha 58°) - will fail again unless complete osteochondroplasty performed to less than 50°, must address underlying mechanical problem
✗Not counseling about lower success rate of revision - 60-70% vs 75-85% primary, patient needs realistic expectations about outcomes
✗Dismissing patient frustration - empathic communication that this was technical issue from incomplete first surgery, explain correctable cause and reasonable success rate for revision
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the target alpha angle after cam osteochondroplasty?"
"What are the success rates of revision hip arthroscopy?"
"What are the indications for labral reconstruction vs repair?"

MCQ Practice Points

Location

Q: What is the most common location for hip labral tears? A: Anterosuperior (85%). Usually associated with FAI (cam or pincer morphology).

Imaging

Q: What is the gold standard imaging for hip labral tears? A: MR arthrogram (MRA). Intra-articular gadolinium improves sensitivity and specificity.

Treatment

Q: Is labral debridement or repair preferred? A: Repair is preferred. Multiple studies show better outcomes with repair. Preserves labral function and proprioception.

Australian Context

Clinical Practice: Hip labral tears are commonly diagnosed and treated in Australia. MR arthrography is widely available. Hip arthroscopy is performed at specialized centers.

HIP LABRAL TEARS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Labral Function (SSSD)

  • •Seal (suction seal)
  • •Stabilize femoral head
  • •Surface area increase (28%)
  • •Depth increase (22%)

Key Facts

  • •Anterosuperior 85% (FAI-related)
  • •FADIR test positive
  • •MR arthrogram gold standard
  • •Repair preferred over debridement

Causes (FAD-T)

  • •FAI (cam/pincer)
  • •Acetabular dysplasia
  • •Degeneration
  • •Trauma

Treatment Principles

  • •Address underlying morphology
  • •Repair if possible
  • •Debridement for irreparable tissue
  • •Incomplete correction leads to failure
Quick Stats
Reading Time66 min
Related Topics

Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement

Pincer-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement

Trunnionosis and Taper Corrosion

Blood Supply of the Hip