Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Macrodactyly

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Macrodactyly

Rare congenital anomaly characterized by localized gigantism of digits, requiring staged surgical management and multidisciplinary care

complete
Updated: 2025-01-24

Macrodactyly

High Yield Overview

Macrodactyly

Congenital localized gigantism of digits following nerve territory distribution - staged surgical management

80%Median nerve territory
60-70%Static type (proportional growth)
2-4 yrsOptimal age to start surgery
1:100kIncidence (live births)

Barsky Classification

Critical Must-Knows

  • Nerve territory distribution is PATHOGNOMONIC - median nerve 80%, ulnar 15-20%
  • All mesenchymal elements enlarged (bone, nerve, fat, skin, vessels)
  • Two types: Static (proportional growth) vs Progressive (accelerated growth)
  • Staged debulking preferred - preserve neurovascular structures
  • Epiphysiodesis before skeletal maturity to prevent further length discrepancy

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Index and middle finger = median nerve; ring and small = ulnar nerve
  • "
    MRI shows intraneural lipomatosis (high T1 signal in enlarged nerve)
  • "
    Ray amputation may be best option for severe, non-functional digits
  • "
    Progressive type has higher recurrence and worse functional outcomes

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Toe deformities of two patients with Moebius. Clinical photographs of the toes of patient no. 5 (a-b) shows curly toes of the left third and fourth toe and the right fourth and fifth toe. Clinical pho
Click to expand
Toe deformities of two patients with Moebius. Clinical photographs of the toes of patient no. 5 (a-b) shows curly toes of the left third and fourth toCredit: Open-i / NIH via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Preoperative photograph. Preoperative photograph showing enlargement of the left thumb and index finger.
Click to expand
Preoperative photograph. Preoperative photograph showing enlargement of the left thumb and index finger.Credit: Kwon JH et al. via Arch Plast Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Preoperative magnetic resonance image (MRI). The fibroadipose tissue showing hyperintensity on T1-weighted MRI image. The density of the excessive adipose tissue is identical to that of normal subcuta
Click to expand
Preoperative magnetic resonance image (MRI). The fibroadipose tissue showing hyperintensity on T1-weighted MRI image. The density of the excessive adiCredit: Kwon JH et al. via Arch Plast Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Postoperative photograph. Postoperative photograph of the operated finger at the 2-month follow-up.
Click to expand
Postoperative photograph. Postoperative photograph of the operated finger at the 2-month follow-up.Credit: Kwon JH et al. via Arch Plast Surg via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

High-Yield Exam Topic

At a Glance

Macrodactyly is a rare congenital disorder characterized by localized overgrowth of all mesenchymal elements of a digit or digits, resulting in disproportionate enlargement. The condition typically follows a nerve territory distribution, most commonly affecting the median nerve territory. Management requires careful timing of interventions, with staged debulking procedures and possible ray amputation for severe cases. Early recognition and multidisciplinary planning optimize functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Mnemonic

BONES FatMacrodactyly Tissue Elements

B
Bone (disproportionate growth, widened phalanges)
O
Overlying skin (thickened, redundant folds)
N
Nerves (enlarged, tortuous, lipomatous infiltration)
E
Excess subcutaneous tissue (massive fibrofatty proliferation)
S
Supporting structures (ligaments, tendons hypertrophied)
Fat
Adipose tissue proliferation (hallmark finding)

Memory Hook:Remember what gets BIG in macrodactyly - BONES and Fat are the key players

Mnemonic

STOP GrowthBarsky Classification

S
Static type (present at birth, proportional growth) - 60-70%
T
Tissue involvement (all elements enlarged)
O
Onset timing (birth versus delayed presentation)
P
Progressive type (accelerated, disproportionate growth) - 30-40%

Memory Hook:Static growth STOPs being proportional, Progressive growth doesn't STOP

Mnemonic

DEARSSurgical Options for Macrodactyly

D
Debulking soft tissue (staged, preserve neurovascular)
E
Epiphysiodesis (prevent further length discrepancy)
A
Angular correction osteotomy (correct deformity)
R
Ray amputation (severe cases, non-functional digits)
S
Staged procedures (preferred over single radical surgery)

Memory Hook:DEARS - staged surgery for our DEAR patients with macrodactyly

Core Exam Knowledge

High-Yield Facts for Viva
  • Pathognomonic feature: Enlargement follows nerve territory distribution (median nerve in 80% of cases)
  • Two clinical types: Static (present at birth, proportional growth) versus progressive (accelerated growth with age)
  • Hallmark histology: Fibrofatty proliferation of all tissue elements including bone, nerve, vessels, and subcutaneous tissue
  • Critical surgical principle: Staged procedures preferred over single-stage radical debulking to preserve neurovascular structures
  • Definitive treatment debate: Debulking versus ray amputation depends on functional deficit and patient age
  • Key differential: Distinguish from hemihypertrophy, neurofibromatosis, vascular malformations, and lymphedema
Exam Day Essentials

Classification Framework: Know Barsky classification (static versus progressive) and affected nerve territories

Surgical Timing: Multiple staged procedures starting at 2-4 years, with epiphysiodesis before skeletal maturity

Complications to Memorize: Joint stiffness, neurovascular injury, recurrence, growth disturbance, functional loss

Australian Context: Multidisciplinary team approach in paediatric hospitals (RCH Melbourne, SCH Sydney)

Epidemiology and Clinical Significance

Incidence and Demographics

IV
Finding: Macrodactyly represents approximately 1% of all congenital hand anomalies

Macrodactyly is exceptionally rare, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 100,000 live births. The condition shows no gender predilection and affects all ethnic groups equally. Approximately 70% of cases are unilateral, with the index and middle fingers most commonly involved when the median nerve territory is affected.

Pattern of Involvement

The distribution of macrodactyly consistently follows nerve territories, which is pathognomonic for the condition. The median nerve territory is affected in approximately 80% of cases, typically involving the index and middle fingers. Ulnar nerve territory involvement occurs in 15-20% of cases, affecting the ring and small fingers. Radial nerve territory involvement is exceptionally rare, representing fewer than 5% of cases.

Associated Conditions

Macrodactyly may occur as an isolated finding or in association with other conditions. Recognized associations include neurofibromatosis type 1 (requiring careful evaluation for café-au-lait spots and family history), Proteus syndrome (asymmetric overgrowth with connective tissue nevi), and Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome (capillary malformations with venous and lymphatic anomalies). Approximately 10-15% of patients have associated syndactyly of the affected digits.

Pathophysiology and Anatomy

Tissue Changes

All mesenchymal tissue elements undergo disproportionate growth in macrodactyly. Histological examination reveals characteristic features including extensive fibrofatty proliferation within and around peripheral nerves (lipomatous macrodystrophy), hypertrophy of all digital tissues, and increased vascularity with tortuous vessels. The bone shows accelerated growth with widened medullary canals and early physeal closure in some cases.

Nerve Involvement

The peripheral nerve involvement is pathognomonic for macrodactyly. The affected nerve appears grossly enlarged, with a diameter that may be 3-5 times normal size. Microscopic examination shows adipose tissue infiltration between nerve fascicles (intraneural lipomatosis), increased epineurial connective tissue, and normal myelinated axons interspersed with excessive perineural fat. This neural lipomatous infiltration distinguishes macrodactyly from other causes of localized gigantism.

Growth Patterns

Static versus Progressive Macrodactyly

featurestaticprogressive
Presentation at birthFull manifestation presentMild or subtle findings
Growth rateProportional to body growthAccelerated, disproportionate
FrequencyMore common (60-70%)Less common (30-40%)
Nerve territoryClearly defined distributionMay cross nerve territories
Surgical timingElective, staged proceduresEarlier intervention needed
PrognosisBetter functional outcomesHigher recurrence, worse function

Classification

Barsky Classification

The Barsky classification divides macrodactyly into two types based on growth pattern. Type I (static macrodactyly) accounts for 60-70% of cases and is characterized by full manifestation at birth with subsequent growth that is proportional to normal body growth. Type II (progressive macrodactyly) represents 30-40% of cases and shows accelerated disproportionate growth, particularly during childhood growth spurts.

Anatomic Classification

Macrodactyly can also be classified by anatomic extent. Digital macrodactyly involves only the digit distal to the metacarpophalangeal joint. Metacarpal macrodactyly includes the metacarpal bone in addition to the digit. Forearm macrodactyly extends proximally to involve forearm structures, though this is rare.

Nerve Territory Classification

Classification by nerve territory involvement (median, ulnar, radial) helps predict pattern of involvement and guides surgical planning. Median nerve territory macrodactyly (80% of cases) typically affects the index and middle fingers. Ulnar nerve territory macrodactyly (15-20%) involves the ring and small fingers. Combined or atypical patterns occur in fewer than 5% of cases.

Clinical Presentation

History and Physical Examination

Parents typically present with concerns about digital enlargement noticed at birth or during early childhood. For static macrodactyly, the disproportion is evident from birth but grows proportionally with the child. Progressive macrodactyly shows accelerated growth that becomes increasingly apparent with age, particularly during growth spurts.

Physical examination reveals characteristic findings including disproportionate enlargement of one or more digits, with involvement of all tissues (skin, subcutaneous tissue, bone, nail). The affected digit feels doughy due to excessive subcutaneous fat. Skin folds may be prominent with redundant tissue. The nerve territory distribution should be carefully documented, as this is pathognomonic for the diagnosis.

Systematic Assessment: Examine from fingertip to forearm to identify extent of involvement

Nerve Territory Mapping: Document which digits are affected and correlate with median/ulnar/radial nerve distribution

Functional Testing: Assess grip strength, pinch, range of motion, and activities of daily living

Comparative Measurement: Use digital caliper measurements and compare to contralateral normal digits

Associated Findings: Look for syndactyly, café-au-lait spots (neurofibromatosis), vascular malformations

Growth Monitoring: Serial measurements and photographs to document progression

Functional Impairment

Functional deficits vary with the degree of enlargement and digits involved. Common functional problems include difficulty with fine motor tasks, reduced grip strength due to abnormal digit mechanics, impaired pinch when the thumb or index finger is involved, and psychosocial concerns related to appearance. As the child grows, the enlarged digit may interfere with activities such as writing, using utensils, and keyboard use.

Nerve Function

Despite the massive enlargement of the peripheral nerve, neurological function is typically preserved. Sensory examination usually reveals normal two-point discrimination, though some patients may report hyperesthesia or altered sensation. Motor function of intrinsic muscles supplied by the affected nerve is generally normal unless there has been prior surgical intervention.

Investigations

Radiographic Evaluation

IV
Finding: Radiographic findings include soft tissue enlargement, widened phalanges with splaying of the epiphyses, and advanced bone age in the affected digit

Plain radiographs of the hand are essential for initial assessment and surgical planning. Anteroposterior and lateral views demonstrate characteristic features including soft tissue prominence, widened phalanges with cortical thickening, splayed epiphyses, and occasionally advanced skeletal maturation in the affected digit compared to adjacent normal digits.

Serial radiographs allow monitoring of growth velocity and timing of epiphysiodesis. The bone age of the affected digit may be advanced compared to the chronological age, particularly in progressive macrodactyly. Measurement of phalangeal width, length, and angulation should be documented for comparison over time.

Advanced Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides detailed soft tissue characterization and surgical planning information. MRI demonstrates the extent of fibrofatty infiltration, nerve enlargement with intraneural lipomatosis (characteristic high signal on T1-weighted images), vascular anatomy, and relationship of enlarged structures to joints and tendons.

MRI is particularly valuable when considering debulking procedures, as it allows precise delineation of neurovascular bundles and planning of tissue excision. Fat-suppressed sequences help differentiate lipomatous tissue from other soft tissue elements.

Vascular Studies

Ultrasound Doppler examination or MR angiography may be considered when vascular anomalies are suspected or when extensive debulking is planned. These studies identify the course of digital arteries, assess for arteriovenous malformations, and help predict vascular complications during surgery.

Management

Non-Operative Treatment

IV
Finding: Conservative management with observation and orthotic support may be appropriate for mild cases with minimal functional impairment

Conservative management is reserved for mild cases with minimal functional deficit and acceptable cosmesis. Options include observation with serial monitoring, custom orthotics to improve grip and pinch mechanics, and occupational therapy to optimize hand function and compensatory strategies.

Patient and family education is critical, including discussion of natural history, treatment options, realistic expectations regarding surgical outcomes, and psychosocial support. Many families benefit from connection to support groups or interaction with other families managing similar conditions.

Surgical Treatment Principles

Surgical management of macrodactyly is challenging and requires meticulous planning. The goals of surgery include improving function, enhancing cosmesis, preventing further progression, and preserving neurovascular structures. Multiple staged procedures are typically required, with intervention timing individualized to the patient.

Debulking Procedures

Macrodactyly Surgical Options

featureindicationtechniqueoutcomes
Soft tissue debulkingModerate enlargement, good skeletal alignmentExcision of subcutaneous fat, nerve decompressionImproved cosmesis, high recurrence risk
EpiphysiodesisLongitudinal overgrowth, skeletal immaturityPhyseal ablation of affected digitPrevents further length discrepancy
Osteotomy and bone reductionPhalangeal widening, angular deformityWedge osteotomy, longitudinal bone excisionCorrects alignment, reduces width
Ray amputationSevere deformity, poor function, family preferenceComplete digit and metacarpal excisionDefinitive treatment, immediate correction

Soft tissue debulking involves excision of excess subcutaneous fibrofatty tissue through carefully planned incisions. Neurovascular structures are meticulously dissected and preserved. The enlarged nerve may be neurolysed, with excision of excessive epineurial tissue, though this carries risk of neurological injury. Skin reduction is performed, often requiring Z-plasties or local flaps to achieve closure without tension.

Skeletal Procedures

Epiphysiodesis is performed to control longitudinal growth when length discrepancy is present or anticipated. Timing is critical, typically performed between ages 7-10 years to achieve balanced length by skeletal maturity. Multiple levels may require epiphysiodesis in severe cases.

Phalangeal osteotomies address width and angulation deformities. Techniques include wedge osteotomies for angular correction, longitudinal excision of bone to narrow the phalanx, and shortening osteotomies for severe length discrepancy. Fixation is achieved with smooth wires or small plates depending on bone size and patient age.

Ray Amputation

IV
Finding: Ray amputation provides definitive correction but should be reserved for severe cases where function and appearance cannot be adequately improved with debulking procedures

Ray amputation (complete excision of the digit and corresponding metacarpal) is considered when severe deformity precludes functional improvement with debulking, when multiple failed debulking procedures have occurred with poor results, or when family strongly prefers definitive single-stage treatment after counseling. The procedure provides immediate correction but sacrifices the digit permanently.

Indications for ray amputation include border digit involvement (index or small finger) where loss is functionally better tolerated, progressive type with massive enlargement unresponsive to debulking, or patient/family preference after thorough discussion of alternatives. The technique involves complete excision of the ray with preservation of adjacent intermetacarpal ligaments, reconstruction of the transverse metacarpal arch, and careful soft tissue closure to avoid web space contracture.

Surgical Timing

Mnemonic

STEP by Step SurgeryMacrodactyly Surgical Timeline

Memory Hook:Think of the STEPS through childhood - each stage has specific procedures

The first debulking procedure is typically performed between ages 2-4 years when functional limitations become apparent and the child is cooperative with hand therapy. Epiphysiodesis is timed for ages 7-10 years to achieve balanced length by skeletal maturity, requiring careful calculation based on predicted growth. Additional debulking procedures are staged at 2-3 year intervals to allow soft tissue recovery and minimize scarring. Definitive skeletal procedures (osteotomies) are often delayed until ages 8-12 years when bone stock is adequate for fixation.

Complications

Surgical Complications

Neurovascular Injury: Most feared complication during debulking; requires meticulous dissection with loupe magnification

Recurrence: Occurs in 30-50% after soft tissue debulking; plan for staged revisions from outset

Joint Stiffness: Common after extensive soft tissue procedures; aggressive hand therapy essential

Skin Necrosis: Risk with excessive skin excision or tension; plan incisions carefully with tissue viability in mind

Nerve Dysesthesia: May occur after neurolysis; usually temporary but counsel families preoperatively

Early complications include wound healing problems (skin edge necrosis, dehiscence, infection), neurovascular injury (digital nerve or artery damage during dissection), and compartment syndrome (rare but possible with extensive debulking). Late complications include recurrence of soft tissue overgrowth (particularly in progressive type), joint stiffness and contracture, growth disturbance if physes are injured, and chronic pain or hypersensitivity.

Functional Outcomes

Functional outcomes are variable and depend on multiple factors including type (static versus progressive), extent of involvement, number and type of procedures performed, and patient compliance with therapy. Static macrodactyly generally achieves better functional outcomes than progressive type. Early intervention with staged procedures tends to yield better results than delayed single-stage radical debulking.

Long-term studies report that 60-70% of patients achieve good to excellent functional outcomes with preserved sensation, useful range of motion, and acceptable cosmesis. However, recurrence requiring additional procedures occurs in 30-50% of cases, particularly in progressive macrodactyly. Patient and family satisfaction correlates more closely with realistic expectation-setting than with objective functional measures.

Viva Scenarios

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Static Macrodactyly - Surgical Planning

EXAMINER

"A 3-year-old boy presents with enlargement of the index and middle fingers present since birth. The fingers are functional but parents are concerned about appearance and anticipate functional problems as he grows. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is consistent with static macrodactyly affecting the median nerve territory. I would perform a systematic assessment including detailed history to confirm the enlargement has grown proportionally since birth, thorough examination documenting extent of involvement and nerve territory distribution, functional assessment of grip and pinch, and radiographic evaluation with hand X-rays. Initial management would involve observation with serial monitoring if function is preserved, patient and family education about natural history and treatment options, and planning for staged surgical intervention typically starting around age 2-4 years if functional deficits develop or are anticipated.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Confirm static versus progressive type through growth history
Document nerve territory involvement (median nerve in this case)
Establish baseline function and measurements for comparison
Educate family about staged approach and realistic expectations
Plan timing of first debulking for ages 2-4 years if indicated
Consider early epiphysiodesis planning (ages 7-10 years) if length discrepancy anticipated
COMMON TRAPS
✗Recommending single-stage radical debulking (high complication rate, poor outcomes)
✗Delaying intervention until adolescence (missed opportunity for epiphysiodesis)
✗Failing to identify nerve territory distribution (pathognomonic feature)
✗Not discussing ray amputation as an option when counseling family
✗Promising complete correction or 'cure' (recurrence is common)
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would make you recommend ray amputation instead of debulking?"
"How do you time epiphysiodesis procedures?"
"What are the histological findings in macrodactyly?"
"How does this differ from neurofibromatosis?"
"What is your approach to nerve neurolysis during debulking?"
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

Progressive Macrodactyly - Complex Case

EXAMINER

"A 7-year-old girl with known macrodactyly affecting her ring and small fingers has had two previous debulking procedures. The digits continue to grow disproportionately and now interfere with hand function. Parents ask about further options. How would you counsel them?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is progressive macrodactyly of the ulnar nerve territory with recurrence after staged debulking, which is a challenging scenario. I would review the previous surgical records and examine the patient to assess current functional status, extent of recurrent overgrowth, condition of skin and soft tissues after previous surgeries, and neurovascular status. I would obtain updated radiographs to assess skeletal maturation and consider MRI for surgical planning. Counseling would include discussion that progressive type has higher recurrence rates, additional debulking is possible but carries diminishing returns with each procedure, epiphysiodesis should be considered now if not already done, and ray amputation of the affected border digits (ring and small finger) may provide better long-term function than repeated debulking attempts. I would present both options with realistic expectations and involve occupational therapy in the decision-making process.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Progressive macrodactyly has higher recurrence rates than static type
Multiple previous procedures increase risk of complications
Epiphysiodesis timing is critical (age 7-10 years ideal)
Ray amputation may be preferable to multiple failed debulking procedures
Border digits (index, small finger) tolerate amputation better functionally
Involve child in age-appropriate decision-making process
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding with another debulking without discussing amputation option
✗Failing to assess skeletal maturity and epiphysiodesis timing
✗Not reviewing previous operative notes and complications
✗Promising better outcomes than previous procedures without changing approach
✗Making unilateral decision without patient/family input and multidisciplinary consultation
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What functional deficits would you expect after ring and small finger ray amputation?"
"How would you perform the ray amputation procedure?"
"What are the psychological considerations in a 7-year-old?"
"How does MRI help in surgical planning for debulking?"
"What is the role of nerve neurolysis in this patient?"

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Macrodactyly
Click to expand
Management algorithm for MacrodactylyCredit: OrthoVellum

High-Yield Exam Summary

Definition and Pathognomonic Features

  • •Localized gigantism of all mesenchymal tissue elements following nerve territory distribution (median nerve 80%)
  • •Hallmark histology: fibrofatty proliferation with intraneural lipomatosis
  • •Incidence: 1 in 100,000 live births

Classification - Barsky Types

  • •TYPE I (Static, 60-70%): Full manifestation at birth, proportional growth
  • •TYPE II (Progressive, 30-40%): Accelerated disproportionate growth
  • •Also classified by nerve territory (median/ulnar/radial) and anatomic extent (digital/metacarpal/forearm)

Clinical Presentation Pearls

  • •Digital enlargement from birth or early childhood, doughy feel due to subcutaneous fat, follows nerve distribution
  • •Median territory: index and middle fingers
  • •Ulnar territory: ring and small fingers
  • •Function typically preserved despite appearance

Investigation Protocol

  • •Plain radiographs (AP/lateral): widened phalanges, splayed epiphyses, advanced bone age
  • •MRI: extent of fibrofatty infiltration, nerve enlargement (high T1 signal), surgical planning
  • •Vascular studies if planning extensive debulking

Surgical Treatment Algorithm

  • •STAGED APPROACH preferred
  • •Ages 2-4 years: First soft tissue debulking
  • •Ages 7-10 years: Epiphysiodesis to control length
  • •Ages 8-12 years: Skeletal procedures (osteotomies)
  • •RAY AMPUTATION: Severe deformity, border digits, failed debulking, progressive type

Key Complications

  • •Recurrence (30-50%, especially progressive type)
  • •Neurovascular injury during debulking
  • •Joint stiffness post-surgery
  • •Skin necrosis with excessive excision
  • •Nerve dysesthesia after neurolysis
  • •Growth disturbance if physes injured

Differential Diagnosis

  • •Neurofibromatosis (café-au-lait spots, family history, plexiform neurofibromas)
  • •Hemihypertrophy (crosses nerve territories)
  • •Vascular malformations (AVM, lymphatic)
  • •Proteus syndrome (connective tissue nevi, asymmetric overgrowth)
  • •Lymphedema (pitting edema, no bone involvement)

Viva Talking Points

  • •Emphasize nerve territory distribution as pathognomonic
  • •Discuss staged versus single-stage approach (staged preferred)
  • •Know epiphysiodesis timing (ages 7-10 years)
  • •Ray amputation indications (border digits, failed debulking)
  • •Recurrence common, set realistic expectations
  • •Multidisciplinary approach essential

Additional Resources and Further Reading

IV
Finding: Modern management emphasizes individualized treatment planning with staged procedures, preservation of neurovascular structures, and realistic expectation-setting with families

Contemporary management of macrodactyly focuses on function over cosmesis, staged interventions to minimize complications, and multidisciplinary team involvement. Outcomes research demonstrates that patient satisfaction correlates closely with preoperative counseling quality and realistic expectations rather than achievement of normal-appearing digits.

Australian Specific Considerations

Macrodactyly is managed in tertiary paediatric centres with specialized hand surgery services, including the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne and Sydney Children's Hospital. Multidisciplinary clinics involving orthopaedic hand surgeons, plastic surgeons, occupational therapists, and psychologists optimize outcomes. Public hospital access is available through paediatric orthopaedic services, with private options for families seeking additional consultation.

Long-term follow-up extending into adolescence and early adulthood is important for monitoring outcomes, managing recurrence, and addressing psychosocial concerns. Transition to adult hand services should be planned collaboratively to ensure continuity of care.

Key Examination Techniques

Clinical examination should systematically assess digital size (measurement with calipers comparing to contralateral normal digits), nerve territory distribution (map which digits are affected and correlate with median, ulnar, or radial nerve), functional assessment (grip strength, pinch, ROM, ADLs), skin quality (redundancy, scarring from previous surgery), and neurovascular status (sensation, pulses, capillary refill). Serial photography with standardized positioning is valuable for documenting progression and surgical outcomes.

Radiographic technique should include true anteroposterior and lateral views of the hand with magnification markers, comparison views of the contralateral normal hand, and skeletal maturity assessment (bone age). Advanced imaging with MRI should utilize T1-weighted sequences to demonstrate lipomatous tissue (high signal), fat-suppressed T2 sequences to show tissue edema or inflammation, and contrast-enhanced sequences if vascular anomaly is suspected.

Future Directions

Research into the molecular basis of macrodactyly may identify specific genetic mutations or signaling pathway abnormalities, potentially opening avenues for medical therapies. Improved surgical techniques including liposuction-assisted debulking and minimally invasive approaches are being investigated. Long-term outcome studies with validated functional and patient-reported measures are needed to better guide treatment decision-making and timing of interventions.


This topic provides comprehensive coverage of macrodactyly aligned with FRACS examination requirements, emphasizing clinical decision-making, surgical planning, and evidence-based management of this rare congenital hand anomaly.

Quick Stats
Reading Time75 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand