Midcarpal Instability
Non-dissociative carpal instability with abnormal motion between proximal and distal carpal rows
Critical Must-Knows
- Pathognomonic: Painful catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
- VISI pattern (reducible) - scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees
- Midcarpal shift test reproduces symptoms
- Gold standard: Dynamic fluoroscopy + arthroscopy
- Surgical treatment: Dorsal capsulodesis
Examiner's Pearls
- "Distinguish from static VISI (lunotriquetral dissociation)
- "Beighton score assesses generalized laxity
- "Lichtman classification (Grade I-IV) guides treatment
- "Conservative strengthening may suffice in mild cases
Exam Warning
At a Glance
Midcarpal instability (MCI) is a non-dissociative carpal instability pattern characterised by abnormal motion between the proximal and distal carpal rows. The pathognomonic finding is a painful "catch-up clunk" during ulnar deviation, caused by sudden shift from VISI (palmar flexion) to neutral alignment as lax palmar midcarpal ligaments are overcome. It is associated with generalised ligamentous laxity (Beighton score positive in 60-70%) and predominantly affects young females. Diagnosis requires the midcarpal shift test, dynamic fluoroscopy, and arthroscopy (Lichtman classification). Treatment ranges from conservative strengthening to dorsal capsulodesis or limited arthrodesis for refractory cases.
CLUNKMCI Features - CLUNK
Memory Hook:The CLUNK reminds you of the catch-up clunk sound
DFAMMCI Diagnosis - DFAM
Memory Hook:Dynamic Fluoroscopy And Midcarpal shift test
CSLMCI Treatment Ladder - CSL
Memory Hook:Conservative, Soft tissue, Limited fusion
Classification
Lichtman Classification of Midcarpal Instability:
- Grade I: Mild laxity with positive shift test, easily reducible
- Grade II: Moderate laxity with significant subluxation, reducible
- Grade III: Severe laxity with fixed subluxation, partially reducible
- Grade IV: Fixed instability, not reducible, cartilage damage
Treatment Based on Classification:
- Grade I-II: Conservative management, consider capsulodesis if refractory
- Grade III: Capsulodesis or ligament reconstruction
- Grade IV: Limited arthrodesis (four-corner fusion)
Core Exam Knowledge
- Defining feature: Painful clunk during ulnar deviation (catch-up clunk) due to sudden shift from VISI to neutral alignment
- Classification: Non-dissociative carpal instability (both carpal rows move as units, instability occurs between the rows)
- Anatomic basis: Palmar midcarpal ligament laxity, particularly triquetrohamate and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid ligaments
- Associated finding: Generalized ligamentous laxity (positive Beighton score) in 60-70% of patients
- Gold standard diagnosis: Dynamic fluoroscopy demonstrating catch-up clunk plus arthroscopic confirmation of midcarpal laxity
- Surgical principle: Dorsal capsulodesis (limiting palmar flexion of proximal row) is most common definitive treatment
Clinical Test: Midcarpal shift test - examiner applies palmar-directed force on dorsal capitate while patient ulnarly deviates wrist, reproducing painful clunk
Fluoroscopic Finding: VISI alignment (volar intercalated segment instability) in neutral position that corrects with radial deviation
Arthroscopic Classification: Lichtman classification (Grade I-IV based on degree of laxity and reducibility)
Surgical Options: Dorsal capsulodesis, palmar ligament reconstruction, limited arthrodesis (4-corner fusion) for severe cases
Incidence and Demographics
Incidence and Demographics
Midcarpal instability represents approximately 5-10% of all carpal instability cases. The condition shows a strong female predominance (female to male ratio 4:1) and typically presents in the second to fourth decades of life. Many cases are initially misdiagnosed as wrist sprain, ganglia, or other wrist pathology, leading to delayed diagnosis averaging 12-24 months from symptom onset.
Risk Factors
Generalized ligamentous laxity is present in 60-70% of patients with MCI, assessed using the Beighton hypermobility score. Other risk factors include history of wrist trauma (30-40% of cases), particularly dorsiflexion and ulnar deviation injuries, repetitive loading activities (gymnastics, yoga, weight training), and connective tissue disorders (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan syndrome). A subset of patients has bilateral involvement, suggesting constitutional laxity as the primary etiology.
Natural History
Without treatment, MCI typically follows a chronic course with persistent symptoms. Pain and clunking may worsen with activities requiring forceful grip or ulnar deviation. Progressive weakness and functional limitation are common. Long-term concerns include potential development of midcarpal arthritis, though this is less common than in dissociative carpal instabilities such as scapholunate dissociation. Spontaneous resolution is rare in adults but may occur in adolescents as skeletal maturity is reached.
Carpal Kinematics
Carpal Kinematics
High Yield
At a Glance
Midcarpal instability (MCI) is a non-dissociative carpal instability pattern characterised by abnormal motion between the proximal and distal carpal rows. The pathognomonic finding is a painful "catch-up clunk" during ulnar deviation, caused by sudden shift from VISI (palmar flexion) to neutral alignment as lax palmar midcarpal ligaments are overcome. It is associated with generalised ligamentous laxity (Beighton score positive in 60-70%) and predominantly affects young females. Diagnosis requires the midcarpal shift test, dynamic fluoroscopy, and arthroscopy (Lichtman classification). Treatment ranges from conservative strengthening to dorsal capsulodesis or limited arthrodesis for refractory cases.
In MCI, the carpal alignment is typically VISI in neutral wrist position, with a scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees and capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees with palmar angulation. However, this VISI pattern is dynamic and reducible, disappearing with radial deviation or grip. This distinguishes MCI from static VISI patterns seen with lunotriquetral dissociation.
Clinical Presentation
History
Patients typically present with ulnar-sided wrist pain that is activity-related and associated with a painful clunk or snap. The clunk is often audible to others and may be accompanied by a sensation of the wrist "giving way" or feeling unstable. Symptoms are exacerbated by activities requiring forceful grip with ulnar deviation (tennis, golf, weight lifting, push-ups) or repetitive wrist motion.
Many patients report difficulty with daily activities including opening jars, lifting heavy objects, pushing up from chairs, and keyboard use. Pain is typically intermittent and mechanical in nature, rather than constant. Swelling is usually mild if present. A subset of patients can voluntarily reproduce the clunk and may have developed a habit of self-manipulation (similar to knuckle cracking).
Physical Examination
Inspection: Look for swelling (usually minimal), asymmetry, muscle atrophy (rare), and signs of generalized laxity
Palpation: Midcarpal joint tenderness (dorsal and palmar), no discrete mass, capitate prominence dorsally in VISI position
Range of Motion: Typically full or near-full ROM; document flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation
Provocative Tests: Midcarpal shift test (key test), catch-up clunk with ulnar deviation, reduction with radial deviation
Strength: Often reduced grip strength on affected side (20-40% reduction common)
Ligamentous Laxity: Beighton score assessment (thumb to forearm, finger hyperextension, elbow/knee hyperextension, spine flexion)
The midcarpal shift test is the most specific clinical maneuver for diagnosing MCI. The examiner stabilizes the patient's forearm with one hand while placing the thumb of the other hand on the dorsal capitate, applying a palmar-directed force. The patient then actively ulnarly deviates the wrist. A positive test reproduces the painful clunk and sensation of instability as the proximal row suddenly shifts from palmar flexion to neutral.
Additional provocative maneuvers include the catch-up clunk test (passive motion from radial to ulnar deviation reproduces the clunk), the supination lift test (inability to lift weight while forearm is supinated due to pain and instability), and the shear test (applying dorsal-palmar shear force across the midcarpal joint elicits pain).
Functional Impact
Functional deficits vary with activity level and symptom severity. Common limitations include reduced grip strength (typically 50-80% of contralateral side), difficulty with activities requiring wrist extension and ulnar deviation, avoidance of weight-bearing on the affected extremity, and compensatory movement patte
Key Mnemonics
VISI Clunks During UlnarCarpal Row Motion in Midcarpal Instability
Memory Hook:VISI position suddenly Clunks to neutral During Ulnar deviation - that's the catch-up clunk
Normal carpal kinematics involve coordinated motion between the proximal and distal carpal rows. During radial deviation, the proximal row extends and the scaphoid extends. During ulnar deviation, the proximal row flexes (palmar flexion) and the scaphoid flexes. This motion is controlled by intrinsic and extrinsic carpal ligaments that provide constraint and stability.
Ligamentous Anatomy
The palmar midcarpal ligaments are critical stabilizers preventing excessive palmar flexion of the proximal carpal row. Key structures include the triquetrohamate-capitate ligament (strongest palmar midcarpal ligament), scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) ligament complex, and palmar scaphocapitate ligament. These ligaments originate from the distal carpal row and insert on the proximal row, providing a sling effect that prevents excessive VISI alignment.
Insufficiency or laxity of these palmar midcarpal ligaments allows the proximal row to assume a palmar flexed (VISI) position. As the wrist is moved from radial to ulnar deviation, the forces eventually overcome the lax ligaments and the proximal row suddenly snaps from palmar flexion to neutral or even slight extension. This sudden shift creates the characteristic catch-up clunk.
Carpal Alignment Patterns
VISI versus DISI Carpal Instability Patterns
| feature | visi | disi |
|---|---|---|
| Proximal row position | Palmar flexion (flexed) | Dorsiflexion (extended) |
| Scapholunate angle | Less than 30 degrees | Greater than 70 degrees |
| Capitolunate angle | Greater than 15 degrees (palmar) | Greater than 15 degrees (dorsal) |
| Common etiology | Lunotriquetral dissociation or midcarpal instability | Scapholunate dissociation |
| Lateral radiograph appearance | Lunate tilts palmarly (cup spills palmar) | Lunate tilts dorsally (cup spills dorsal) |
MILD MCILichtman MCI Classification
Memory Hook:Think of severity progression from MILD to severe MCI
The Lichtman classification is the most widely used system for MCI. Grade I (dynamic) shows VISI alignment only with provocative maneuvers and is often asymptomatic. Grade II (static reducible) demonstrates VISI on resting lateral radiograph but corrects with radial deviation or grip. Grade III (static irreducible) shows persistent VISI that does not fully correct with radial deviation. Grade IV (arthritic) demonstrates midcarpal degenerative changes in addition to instability.
Anatomic Subtypes
MCI can be classified anatomically based on the primary site of laxity. Palmar MCI (most common, 80-90% of cases) involves laxity of the palmar midcarpal ligaments with VISI alignment. Dorsal MCI (rare, less than 10%) involves dorsal midcarpal ligament laxity with DISI-type alignment. Combined patterns may occur, particularly in patients with severe generalized ligamentous laxity.
Extrinsic versus Intrinsic MCI
Extrinsic MCI results from radiocarpal ligament laxity (particularly palmar radiocarpal ligaments) that allows abnormal proximal row position. Intrinsic MCI results from midcarpal ligament laxity (triquetrohamate, STT complex) that fails to control proximal row position. This distinction is primarily theoretical, as most cases involve combined laxity patterns and treatment is similar.
Management
Non-Operative Treatment
rns. Athletes may be unable to participate in their sport, particularly in gymnastics, racquet sports, golf, and weight training.
Radiographic Evaluation
Radiographic Evaluation
Standard radiographs (posteroanterior, lateral, oblique views) are often normal or show subtle findings. The lateral view may demonstrate VISI alignment in neutral position with a capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees (palmar angulation) and scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees. However, these findings may be absent on static radiographs if the patient is not relaxed or if the technologist inadvertently positions the wrist in slight radial deviation.
Dynamic fluoroscopic examination with video recording is the gold standard radiographic study for diagnosing MCI. The examination is performed with the patient seated and the forearm resting on the fluoroscopy table. Real-time imaging captures the wrist as it moves from full radial to full ulnar deviation. The catch-up clunk is visualized as a sudden shift of the proximal carpal row from palmar flexion (VISI) to neutral or slight extension.
Stress radiographs may be helpful, including ulnar deviation views (may accentuate VISI deformity), grip compression views (assess for dynamic instability), and comparison views of the contralateral wrist. Quantitative measurements include the capitolunate angle (normal less than 15 degrees), scapholunate angle (normal 30-60 degrees), and radiolunate angle (normal 0 plus or minus 15 degrees).
Advanced Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically normal in isolated MCI, as the ligamentous laxity represents attenuation rather than complete rupture. MR arthrography may show increased capacity of the midcarpal joint or contrast extravasation into the radiocarpal joint with midcarpal injection, suggesting ligamentous communication. However, MRI is primarily useful for excluding other pathology such as triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears, lunotriquetral dissociation, or occult fractures.
Computed tomography (CT) is rarely indicated for MCI evaluation unless there is concern for subtle carpal coalition, malunion, or arthritis. CT arthrography has been described but is not commonly used in current practice given the superiority of MRI and arthroscopy for soft tissue assessment.
Wrist Arthroscopy
Wrist arthroscopy is both diagnostic and potentially therapeutic for MCI. The examination is performed under regional or general anesthesia with the wrist in traction. Standard portals (3-4, 4-5, 6R radiocarpal; midcarpal radial and ulnar) are established. The midcarpal joint is examined for excessive laxity between the proximal and distal rows, assessed using a probe (trampoline test or bounce test). The palmar midcarpal ligaments are visualized and assessed for attenuation, thinning, or disruption.
Arthroscopic classification systems have been proposed based on the degree of laxity and reducibility. Grade I shows mild laxity with easy manual reduction, Grade II demonstrates moderate laxity with manual reduction required, Grade III exhibits severe laxity that is difficult to reduce, and Grade IV shows severe laxity with associated midcarpal arthritis or other structural damage.
Classification
Lichtman Classification of Palmar Midcarpal Instability
Conservative management is the initial treatment for most patients with MCI, particularly those with mild symptoms (Lichtman Grade I-II) and those with generalized ligamentous laxity. The mainstay of treatment is wrist strengthening and proprioceptive training, focusing on dynamic stabilizers (flexor carpi ulnaris, extensor carpi ulnaris, wrist extensors and flexors). A structured hand therapy program should include progressive resistance exercises, proprioceptive training (balance board, closed kinetic chain activities), and activity-specific training.
Splinting may provide symptom relief, particularly for acute exacerbations. Options include cock-up wrist splints maintaining the wrist in slight radial deviation and extension (prevents VISI position), custom molded splints for activities, and taping techniques to support the wrist during provocative activities. Splints are typically worn during aggravating activities and at night for 6-12 weeks during the rehabilitation program.
Activity modification involves avoiding or modifying activities that provoke symptoms, particularly those requiring forceful grip with ulnar deviation. Anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) may provide short-term pain relief but do not address the underlying instability. Corticosteroid injections are generally not recommended as they do not provide lasting benefit and may contribute to ligamentous weakening.
Indications for Surgery
Surgery is considered when conservative management fails after 3-6 months of appropriate therapy, symptoms significantly limit function or quality of life, patients are unable to participate in work or sports activities, or there is documented progression of instability on dynamic imaging. Relative contraindications include severe generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score greater than 7 out of 9), workers' compensation claims or litigation (poorer outcomes reported), psychiatric comorbidities, and unrealistic patient expectations.
Surgical Options
Surgical Treatment Options for Midcarpal Instability
| feature | indication | technique | outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsal capsulodesis | Grade II-III palmar MCI, most common procedure | Reef dorsal capsule to limit palmar flexion | 70-80% good/excellent, preserves motion |
| Palmar ligament reconstruction | Isolated palmar ligament deficiency | Reconstruct triquetrohamate ligament with graft | Limited long-term data, technically demanding |
| Four-corner fusion | Grade IV with arthritis, salvage procedure | Fuse capitate-hamate-lunate-triquetrum | Reliable pain relief, significant motion loss |
| Arthroscopic thermal shrinkage | Grade I-II, controversial | Radiofrequency shrinkage of lax capsule | High recurrence rate, falling out of favor |
Dorsal Capsulodesis Technique
Dorsal capsulodesis is the most commonly performed procedure for MCI. The technique involves creating a dorsal wrist incision, typically between the third and fourth extensor compartments. The extensor retinaculum is incised and the extensor tendons are retracted to expose the dorsal capsule. A distally based capsular flap is created, preserving the attachment to the distal carpal row. The flap is then advanced proximally and secured to the dorsal lip of the radius, effectively tightening the dorsal structures and limiting palmar flexion of the proximal carpal row.
Multiple capsulodesis techniques have been described, including the Ritt capsulodesis (radially based flap), the Lichtman capsulodesis (ulnarly based flap), and the dorsal radiocarpal ligament advancement. All techniques share the goal of preventing excessive palmar flexion while preserving wrist motion. The capsule is secured with suture anchors or transosseous sutures. Postoperative immobilization in a short arm cast for 6 weeks is typical, followed by progressive range of motion and strengthening.
Palmar Ligament Reconstruction
Palmar ligament reconstruction attempts to directly restore the deficient palmar midcarpal ligaments. The procedure uses tendon graft (palmaris longus, plantaris, or toe extensor) passed through bone tunnels in the capitate and triquetrum to recreate the triquetrohamate-capitate ligament. The technique is technically demanding and requires accurate tunnel placement and appropriate graft tension. Long-term outcomes are variable, with some studies reporting good results and others showing high failure rates. This procedure is less commonly performed than dorsal capsulodesis.
Limited Wrist Arthrodesis
Four-corner fusion (capitate-hamate-lunate-triquetrum arthrodesis with scaphoid excision) is reserved for salvage situations, particularly Lichtman Grade IV MCI with established midcarpal arthritis. The procedure provides reliable pain relief and stability but sacrifices approximately 50% of wrist motion (particularly flexion-extension arc). The technique involves excision of the scaphoid, preparation of the articular surfaces of the four remaining bones, and fixation with a circular plate, dorsal plate, or compression screws. Scaphoid excision prevents impingement and allows settling of the carpus.
Total wrist arthrodesis is considered only for failed prior procedures or severe symptomatic arthritis affecting multiple carpal articulations. This salvage procedure eliminates all wrist motion but provides stable pain-free support for activities of daily living.
Complications
Surgical Complications
Recurrent Instability: Most common complication after capsulodesis (15-25%); consider revision versus salvage fusion
Stiffness: Expected loss of 10-20 degrees flexion-extension after capsulodesis; aggressive therapy if excessive
Pain: Persistent pain suggests inadequate stabilization, nerve injury, or unrecognized pathology; investigate thoroughly
Dorsal Ganglion: May form at capsulodesis site; often asymptomatic, excise if symptomatic
Neurovascular Injury: Rare but possible; protect terminal branches of radial and ulnar nerves during dissection
Early complications include wound infection (1-2%), hematoma formation, and iatrogenic nerve injury (dorsal sensory branch of radial nerve or ulnar nerve most vulnerable). Nerve injury typically presents as numbness or dysesthesia over the dorsal hand and may be temporary (neurapraxia) or permanent (nerve division).
Late complications include recurrent instability (most common, occurring in 15-25% after capsulodesis), wrist stiffness (expected to some degree but may be excessive), chronic pain (may indicate inadequate correction or progression to arthritis), and dorsal ganglion formation at the capsulodesis site. Hardware complications (loosening, prominence, irritation) may occur after four-corner fusion.
Outcomes and Prognosis
Outcomes after surgical treatment for MCI are generally favorable for appropriately selected patients. Dorsal capsulodesis results in resolution or significant improvement of the catch-up clunk in 75-85% of patients, with pain improvement in 70-80% and satisfaction scores of 7-8 out of 10. However, recurrence occurs in 15-25% of cases, particularly in patients with severe generalized laxity or those who return to high-demand activities prematurely.
Functional outcomes include return to work in 85-90% of patients at 3-6 months postoperatively, return to sports in 60-70% (often with some activity modification), and grip strength recovery to 80-90% of the contralateral side. Range of motion is typically reduced by 10-20 degrees in flexion-extension arc compared to the contralateral wrist, which is an expected and generally well-tolerated tradeoff for stability.
Factors associated with poorer outcomes include severe generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score greater than 7), workers' compensation or litigation involvement, late presentation with established arthritis (Grade IV), bilateral involvement, and unrealistic patient expectations. Careful patient selection and thorough preoperative counseling are critical to achieving satisfactory outcomes.
MCI Summary
Midcarpal Instability Overview
Definition:
- Non-dissociative carpal instability
- Abnormal motion between proximal and distal carpal rows
- Midcarpal joint is the site of instability
Key Features:
- Pathognomonic finding: Catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
- Associated with generalized ligamentous laxity (60-70%)
- Peak incidence: Young females (20-40 years)
- 4:1 female predominance
MCI Key Facts
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Instability type | Non-dissociative (rows intact, instability between rows) |
| Carpal alignment | VISI pattern (volar intercalated segment instability) |
| Anatomic basis | Palmar midcarpal ligament laxity (triquetrohamate) |
| Gold standard diagnosis | Dynamic fluoroscopy + wrist arthroscopy |
Anatomy
Midcarpal Ligament Anatomy
Palmar Midcarpal Ligaments (Primary Stabilizers):
- Triquetrohamate-capitate ligament - Strongest palmar stabilizer
- Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) ligament complex
- Palmar scaphocapitate ligament
Function:
- Form a "sling" from distal to proximal row
- Prevent excessive palmar flexion of proximal row
- Control the transition during wrist motion
Dorsal Ligaments:
- Dorsal radiocarpal ligament
- Dorsal intercarpal ligament
- Provide secondary restraint to palmar flexion
Classification
Lichtman Classification
Lichtman Classification of MCI
| Grade | Description | Imaging | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I (Dynamic) | VISI only with provocative maneuvers | Normal resting radiograph | Conservative |
| Grade II (Static Reducible) | VISI at rest, corrects with radial deviation | VISI on lateral view | Conservative → Surgery |
| Grade III (Static Irreducible) | Persistent VISI, does not correct | Fixed VISI on all views | Surgery (capsulodesis) |
| Grade IV (Arthritic) | VISI plus midcarpal arthritis | Arthritis on radiograph | Salvage (fusion) |
Clinical Assessment
Clinical Examination
History:
- Painful clunk during wrist motion (pathognomonic)
- Ulnar-sided wrist pain, activity-related
- Worse with forceful grip, ulnar deviation
- Sensation of wrist "giving way"
Examination:
- Assess Beighton score (ligamentous laxity present in 60-70%)
- Midcarpal tenderness (dorsal and palmar)
- Range of motion (usually preserved)
- Grip strength (typically reduced 20-40%)
Key Provocative Test:
- Midcarpal shift test: Examiner applies palmar force on dorsal capitate while patient ulnarly deviates → reproduces clunk
Viva Imaging Review
Imaging for MCI
Standard Radiographs:
- PA, lateral, oblique views
- Often normal on static views
- Lateral may show VISI (capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees palmar)
Gold Standard:
- Dynamic fluoroscopy during ulnar deviation
- Captures the catch-up clunk in real-time
- Video recording essential for documentation
Wrist Arthroscopy:
- Confirms midcarpal laxity (trampoline test)
- Grades severity (Lichtman classification)
- Excludes other pathology
Management Algorithm

Surgical Technique
Dorsal Capsulodesis Technique
Approach:
- Dorsal wrist incision between 3rd and 4th extensor compartments
- Incise extensor retinaculum
- Retract extensor tendons
Capsulodesis Steps:
- Create distally based capsular flap
- Preserve attachment to distal carpal row
- Advance flap proximally
- Secure to dorsal lip of radius
- Tightens dorsal structures, limits palmar flexion
Fixation:
- Suture anchors or transosseous sutures
Immobilization:
- Short arm cast 6 weeks
- Progressive ROM then strengthening
Complications
Surgical Complications
Recurrent Instability (Most Common):
- Occurs in 15-25% after capsulodesis
- Higher risk with severe generalized laxity
- May require revision or salvage fusion
Stiffness:
- Expected 10-20 degree motion loss after capsulodesis
- Excessive stiffness requires aggressive therapy
- Trade-off: Motion loss for stability
Other Complications:
- Persistent pain (inadequate correction or missed pathology)
- Dorsal ganglion at capsulodesis site
- Nerve injury (dorsal sensory branches)
- Wound infection (1-2%)
Postoperative Care
Postoperative Protocol
Dorsal Capsulodesis:
- Short arm cast: 6 weeks
- Progressive ROM: 6-10 weeks
- Strengthening: 10+ weeks
- Return to sport: 4-6 months
Four-Corner Fusion:
- Short arm cast: 8-10 weeks (until fusion)
- Confirm radiographic union
- Progressive ROM after union
- Return to activity: 4-6 months
Outcomes
Outcome Summary
Conservative Management:
- 40-50% satisfactory outcomes for Grade I-II
- Best results with structured therapy program
- May require ongoing activity modification
Dorsal Capsulodesis:
- 70-80% good to excellent outcomes
- Clunk resolution: 75-85%
- Pain improvement: 70-80%
- Patient satisfaction: 7-8/10
Functional Recovery:
- Return to work: 85-90% at 3-6 months
- Return to sport: 60-70% (with some modification)
- Grip strength: 80-90% of contralateral
Evidence Base
Key Evidence
Seminal Studies:
- Lichtman et al (1993): Original classification and capsulodesis outcomes
- Johnson & Carrera (1986): Dynamic fluoroscopy gold standard
- Wright et al (1994): Conservative management outcomes
Key Findings:
- Conservative: 40-50% success for mild MCI
- Capsulodesis: 70-80% good/excellent at 2-5 years
- Recurrence: 15-25% even after surgery
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination
Midcarpal Instability - Initial Diagnosis
"A 24-year-old female gymnast presents with painful clunking in her right wrist that has progressively worsened over the past year. She reports the clunk occurs with certain movements and is accompanied by pain. Examination reveals a positive midcarpal shift test. How would you assess and manage this patient?"
Failed Conservative Management
"The gymnast returns after 6 months of hand therapy and activity modification. She reports some improvement but continues to have significant clunking and pain with gymnastics, which she wants to continue. Grip strength is 60% of the contralateral side. She asks about surgical options. How would you counsel her?"
MCQ Practice Points
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the pathognomonic clinical finding in midcarpal instability?
A: Catch-up clunk or clunk test: Painful clunk during ulnar deviation with axial load as proximal carpal row suddenly shifts from VISI to neutral/DISI position. Represents sudden reduction of subluxed capitate. Reproduces patient's symptoms. Differentiates MCI from other carpal instabilities.
Exam Pearl
Q: What distinguishes palmar from dorsal midcarpal instability?
A: Palmar MCI (most common): Proximal row sits in VISI (volar intercalated segment instability), clunks into extension with ulnar deviation. Dorsal MCI (rare): Proximal row in DISI, clunks into flexion. Palmar MCI involves triquetrohamate ligament laxity; dorsal MCI involves scaphotrapezial ligament laxity.
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the role of the triquetrohamate (TH) ligament in midcarpal stability?
A: The triquetrohamate ligament is the primary restraint preventing VISI deformity. Incompetence allows proximal row to flex (VISI pattern) with the head of capitate subluxing palmarly. During ulnar deviation, intact TH ligament normally controls smooth proximal row extension. Attenuation creates the "catch-up" phenomenon.
Exam Pearl
Q: What is the initial treatment for midcarpal instability?
A: Conservative treatment first: Wrist strengthening (especially ECU and wrist extensors), proprioceptive training, taping, activity modification. Surgical options if conservative fails: Thermal capsulorrhaphy (controversial durability), soft tissue reconstruction, limited carpal fusion (triquetrohamate or four-corner fusion) for refractory cases.
Exam Pearl
Q: How does midcarpal instability appear on static radiographs?
A: Static radiographs often normal - hence termed "non-dissociative" instability. May show VISI pattern (scapholunate angle less than 30°, capitolunate angle greater than 15° palmar). Fluoroscopic examination during active motion essential to demonstrate clunk. Cineradiography captures dynamic instability not visible on static films.
Australian Context
Australian Practice Considerations
Healthcare Settings:
- Hand surgeons with wrist expertise in metropolitan centres
- Access to fluoroscopy for dynamic imaging
- Wrist arthroscopy in major hospitals
Imaging Access:
- Standard radiographs readily available
- Dynamic fluoroscopy requires coordination with radiology
- Video recording capability important for documentation
Hand Therapy:
- Certified hand therapists (CHT) essential for conservative management
- Public hospital hand clinics and private practices
- Medicare rebates with appropriate referral
High-Yield Exam Summary
Definition and Pathognomonic Features
- •Non-dissociative carpal instability with abnormal motion between proximal and distal carpal rows
- •Hallmark: painful catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
- •Anatomic basis: palmar midcarpal ligament laxity (triquetrohamate, STT complex)
- •Associated with generalized ligamentous laxity in 60-70% of cases
Clinical Diagnosis - Key Test
- •MIDCARPAL SHIFT TEST: Stabilize forearm, apply palmar-directed force on dorsal capitate, patient ulnarly deviates wrist
- •Positive: reproduces painful clunk and instability sensation
- •Also perform catch-up clunk test (passive radial to ulnar deviation)
- •Assess Beighton score for generalized laxity
Classification - Lichtman System
- •Grade I (Dynamic): VISI only with provocative maneuvers
- •Grade II (Static Reducible): VISI at rest, corrects with radial deviation
- •Grade III (Static Irreducible): Persistent VISI
- •Grade IV (Arthritic): Midcarpal arthritis present
- •Also classify as palmar (80-90%, VISI) versus dorsal (rare, DISI) MCI
Investigation Protocol
- •Standard radiographs (PA/lateral): Look for VISI alignment (capitolunate angle greater than 15 degrees palmar, scapholunate angle less than 30 degrees)
- •GOLD STANDARD: Dynamic fluoroscopy capturing catch-up clunk during ulnar deviation
- •Wrist arthroscopy: Confirms midcarpal laxity with trampoline test, grades severity
Conservative Management
- •First-line for Grade I-II, 3-6 months trial
- •Components: Wrist strengthening (dynamic stabilizers), proprioceptive training
- •Activity modification (avoid ulnar deviation with grip), splinting in slight radial deviation/extension
- •Success rate 40-50% in mild-moderate cases
- •Surgery if failed conservative care
Surgical Treatment Algorithm
- •PRIMARY: Dorsal capsulodesis (most common) - reef dorsal capsule to limit palmar flexion
- •70-80% good/excellent outcomes; expect 10-20 degree motion loss
- •ALTERNATIVE: Palmar ligament reconstruction (technically demanding, variable results)
- •SALVAGE: Four-corner fusion for Grade IV with arthritis
- •Recurrence rate 15-25% after capsulodesis
Key Complications
- •Recurrent instability (15-25%, especially with generalized laxity)
- •Stiffness (10-20 degree flexion-extension loss expected after capsulodesis, may be excessive)
- •Persistent pain (inadequate stabilization or unrecognized pathology)
- •Dorsal ganglion at capsulodesis site
- •Nerve injury (dorsal sensory branches of radial/ulnar nerves)
Viva Talking Points
- •Emphasize non-dissociative instability (both rows intact, instability between rows)
- •Know midcarpal shift test technique
- •Understand VISI alignment and measurement
- •Dynamic fluoroscopy is gold standard imaging
- •Conservative management first-line (3-6 months)
- •Dorsal capsulodesis most common surgery (70-80% success)
- •Motion loss expected tradeoff for stability; generalized laxity affects prognosis
Additional Resources and Further Reading
Midcarpal instability represents one pattern within the broader spectrum of carpal instability. Familiarity with the classification of carpal instabilities (dissociative versus non-dissociative, VISI versus DISI patterns) is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. MCI must be distinguished from lunotriquetral dissociation (which can also present with VISI), scapholunate dissociation (DISI pattern), and other wrist pathology.
Australian Specific Considerations
Midcarpal instability is managed by hand surgeons with expertise in wrist pathology, typically in metropolitan centres with access to fluoroscopy and wrist arthroscopy capabilities. Public hospital hand clinics provide assessment and treatment, with surgical procedures performed at major teaching hospitals. Private hand surgery practices offer alternative pathways for assessment and operative management.
Imaging is readily available through public and private radiology services, with dynamic fluoroscopy requiring coordination between the hand surgeon and radiologist to ensure appropriate views are captured. Wrist arthroscopy is performed in both public and private hospital settings with appropriate arthroscopic equipment and expertise.
Hand therapy is a critical component of both conservative and postoperative management, with certified hand therapists (CHT) available in major centres. Medicare rebates apply for hand therapy services with appropriate referral. Occupational therapy services may provide functional assessment and work-related rehabilitation for patients with MCI affecting employment.
Examination Techniques and Tips
Clinical examination for suspected MCI should be systematic and include comparison to the contralateral wrist. The midcarpal shift test must be performed correctly with appropriate force application and patient positioning. Video recording the provocative maneuver can be valuable for documentation and patient education.
Dynamic fluoroscopy requires clear communication with the radiology technologist regarding the specific views and maneuvers needed. Real-time video capture during the examination from radial to full ulnar deviation is essential. Side-by-side comparison with the contralateral asymptomatic wrist can be helpful in subtle cases.
Wrist arthroscopy for MCI evaluation requires familiarity with both radiocarpal and midcarpal portals and systematic examination of all carpal articulations. The trampoline test (applying pressure with the probe on the palmar midcarpal ligaments to assess laxity) should be performed in multiple locations. Comparison to the expected normal resistance is subjective and improves with experience.
Future Directions
Research into the molecular basis of ligamentous laxity may identify genetic markers or predisposing factors for MCI, potentially allowing preventive strategies. Improved arthroscopic techniques including thermal capsular modification and ligament reconstruction are being refined. Biomechanical studies using computational modeling may optimize capsulodesis techniques and predict outcomes. Long-term outcome studies with validated patient-reported measures are needed to better compare surgical techniques and guide treatment algorithms.
This topic provides comprehensive coverage of midcarpal instability aligned with FRACS examination requirements, emphasizing clinical diagnosis, dynamic imaging assessment, and evidence-based surgical management of this challenging carpal instability pattern.