Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Ulnar Club Hand (Ulnar Longitudinal Deficiency)

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Ulnar Club Hand (Ulnar Longitudinal Deficiency)

Complete guide to ulnar club hand including classification, surgical management, and functional outcomes in longitudinal upper limb deficiencies

complete
Updated: 2025-01-15

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

ulnar-club-hand imaging 1
Click to expand
Clinical imaging for ulnar-club-handCredit: Hellerhoff via Wikimedia Commons (CC-BY-SA 4.0)

Ulnar Club Hand (Ulnar Longitudinal Deficiency)

High Yield

At a Glance

Ulnar club hand (ulnar longitudinal deficiency) is a rare congenital anomaly (1:100,000 births) involving partial or complete ulnar absence—4x less common than radial club hand. The limb presents with radial deviation, ulnar digit absence (4th/5th fingers), and frequently associated syndactyly (50-60%) and radial head dislocation (40-50%). Unlike radial deficiency, systemic syndrome association is uncommon (~10-15%). The Bayne and Klug classification (Types I-IV) grades severity from hypoplastic ulna to complete absence. Treatment focuses on hand function rather than cosmesis: options include stretching/splinting, first web space deepening, radial osteotomy for severe deviation, and one-bone forearm creation for elbow instability.

Mnemonic

U
U - Ulna absence (partial/complete)
L
L - Little finger often absent
N
N - Nubbins common (finger remnants)
A
A - Associated anomalies (syndactyly, radial head)
R
R - Radial deviation posture
C
C - Central deficiency pattern
L
L - Less common than radial deficiency
U
U - Ulnar nerve abnormalities
B
B - Bones of hand affected (metacarpals absent)

Memory Hook:ULNAR CLUB

Introduction

Ulnar club hand represents a spectrum of congenital upper limb deficiencies involving partial or complete absence of the ulna. This condition is less common than radial club hand, occurring in approximately 1 in 100,000 live births. The deformity typically presents with radial deviation of the hand, absence of ulnar digits, and often associated elbow instability due to radial head dislocation.

Mnemonic

R
R - Radial club hand is 4x MORE common
A
A - Associated with syndactyly (50-60%)
R
R - Radial head dislocation common
E
E - Elbow instability frequent
U
U - Ulnar-sided digits absent (4th/5th)

Memory Hook:RARE-U

Epidemiology

Incidence: 1 in 100,000 live births (compared to 1 in 30,000 for radial deficiency)

Key Demographics:

  • Male:Female ratio approximately 1.5:1
  • Bilateral involvement in 25-30% of cases
  • Sporadic occurrence in most cases
  • Right side slightly more common when unilateral

Australian Context: Limited specific Australian epidemiological data exists. Cases are typically managed in tertiary pediatric centers including Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Sydney Children's Hospital, and Queensland Children's Hospital.

Embryology and Pathogenesis

Critical Developmental Period: 4-8 weeks gestation

Zone of Polarizing Activity (ZPA): The limb bud's organizing center produces Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) protein, controlling ulnar-radial patterning. Disruption leads to ulnar deficiency.

Apical Ectodermal Ridge (AER): Maintains underlying mesenchyme proliferation. AER dysfunction causes longitudinal deficiencies.

Associated Conditions

Classification

Bayne and Klug Classification (1987)

The most widely used classification system, based on radiographic appearance:

Bayne and Klug Classification of Ulnar Deficiency

categoryfeaturescharacteristicselbowhandtreatmentprognosis
Type IHypoplastic ulnaUlna present but short, distal and proximal epiphyses presentStableMild deviation, all digits usually presentOften observation, occasional soft tissue releaseExcellent function
Type IIPartial absence (middle segment)Proximal and distal ulnar segments present, middle absentVariable stabilityModerate radial deviation, ulnar digits may be hypoplasticOne-bone forearm vs reconstructionGood function with treatment
Type IIIComplete absence (distal only)Proximal ulna absent, distal ulnar remnant presentUnstable, radial head dislocation commonSevere radial deviation, often missing 4th/5th digitsOne-bone forearm, radial head excisionFair function, limited rotation
Type IVComplete absenceComplete absence of ulnaVery unstable, severe radiohumeral dislocationSevere deformity, multiple digit absence commonOne-bone forearm mandatory, complex reconstructionLimited function, stability priority

Clinical Application: Type I rarely requires surgery. Types II-IV benefit from surgical intervention, with Type IV requiring most extensive reconstruction.

Cole and Manske Modification (1997)

Adds consideration of hand involvement:

  • A: Normal first web space
  • B: Mild first web space deficiency
  • C: Moderate-to-severe first web space deficiency
  • D: Absent thumb

This modification is critical for surgical planning as thumb function determines overall hand function.

Clinical Presentation

Physical Examination

Functional Impact

Grasp Patterns:

  • Power grip: Reduced with digit absence
  • Precision grip: Depends on thumb function
  • Key pinch: Limited if thumb hypoplastic
  • Hook grip: Limited with 4th/5th digit absence

Activities of Daily Living:

  • Bilateral involvement significantly impacts function
  • Unilateral cases: Contralateral hand dominant for fine tasks
  • Adaptive strategies develop early in childhood
  • Early intervention improves adaptation

Investigations

Radiographic Evaluation

Laboratory Evaluation

Genetic Testing:

  • Karyotype: If syndromic features present
  • TBX3 gene: Ulnar-mammary syndrome suspected
  • NIPBL gene: Cornelia de Lange features
  • Fanconi anemia panel: If bilateral or family history
  • Chromosomal microarray: Unexplained associated anomalies

Hematological:

  • Complete blood count: Rule out Fanconi anemia (macrocytosis, cytopenias)
  • Chromosome breakage test: Fanconi anemia screening
  • Pre-operative: Standard pre-anesthetic workup

Cardiac Evaluation:

  • Echocardiogram if syndromic association suspected
  • ECG for Holt-Oram-like presentations

Non-Operative Management

Observation Criteria

Bayne Type I with minimal deformity:

  • Functional hand with all digits present
  • Stable elbow
  • Minimal radial deviation
  • No progressive deformity
  • Good passive range of motion

Monitor for:

  • Progressive radial deviation
  • Elbow instability development
  • Functional limitations emerging
  • Pain (rare in children)

Splinting and Orthoses

Not typically effective for ulnar deficiency compared to radial deficiency:

  • Radial deviation difficult to correct with splinting
  • Bony deficiency limits orthotic correction
  • May use temporarily post-operatively
  • Dynamic splinting ineffective for this deformity

Occupational Therapy

Early Intervention (0-2 years):

  • Promote bimanual activities
  • Encourage grasp development in present digits
  • Parent education on adaptation strategies
  • Monitor developmental milestones

Ongoing Therapy (greater than 2 years):

  • Adaptive equipment assessment
  • Strengthening present muscles
  • Range of motion maintenance
  • Pre-operative preparation
  • Post-operative rehabilitation

Functional Training:

  • Compensatory techniques for absent digits
  • Assistive device training if needed
  • School activity modification
  • Sports participation strategies

Surgical Management

Mnemonic

O
O - Observation for Type I only
N
N - Nubbins excised if present
E
E - Elbow stabilization priority
B
B - Bone: radius fused to humerus
O
O - One-bone forearm (Types III-IV)
N
N - No rotation post-op (sacrifice made)
E
E - Early surgery (1-2 years ideal)

Memory Hook:ONE BONE

Surgical Indications

Absolute Indications:

  • Progressive elbow instability (Bayne Types III-IV)
  • Severe radial deviation limiting function
  • Radial head dislocation with pain or instability
  • Cosmetically significant deformity in older child

Relative Indications:

  • Bayne Type II with functional limitation
  • Syndactyly release for border digits
  • Nubbins causing functional or cosmetic concern
  • Thumb reconstruction for severe hypoplasia

Timing of Surgery

Primary Reconstruction: 12-24 months

  • Optimal time for one-bone forearm procedure
  • Before habitual compensation patterns fixed
  • Tissues adequate size for surgical technique
  • Anesthetic risk acceptable

Syndactyly Release: 6-18 months

  • Earlier if thumb-index syndactyly (release by 6 months)
  • Border digit release improves appearance
  • May stage with forearm reconstruction

Secondary Procedures: 4-8 years

  • Radial head excision if painful
  • Carpal stabilization if progressive deviation
  • Thumb reconstruction if delayed

One-Bone Forearm Procedure

Indications: Bayne Types III and IV with unstable elbow

Principles:

  • Create stable monorail between humerus and hand
  • Sacrifice forearm rotation for stability
  • Provide stable platform for hand function
  • Position hand optimally for function

Technique:

  1. Approach: Posterior or lateral incision from elbow to wrist
  2. Radial head: Excise if dislocated and irreducible
  3. Radius preparation:
    • Resect distal radius to appropriate length
    • Preserve distal radial epiphysis if possible
    • Create recipient site in distal humerus
  4. Fixation:
    • Intramedullary rod or plate fixation
    • Radius-to-humerus fusion
    • Position in 20-30 degrees flexion, neutral pronation-supination
  5. Soft tissue: Muscle balancing around construct
  6. Wrist: May require additional stabilization

Post-operative Management:

  • Long arm cast 8-12 weeks
  • Serial radiographs to confirm union
  • Gentle mobilization after union
  • Occupational therapy for adaptation

Outcomes:

  • Union rate greater than 90%
  • Stable elbow in greater than 95%
  • No forearm rotation (accepted trade-off)
  • Improved hand positioning for function
  • High patient/parent satisfaction

Radial Head Management

Excision Indications:

  • Painful chronic dislocation
  • Blocking elbow motion
  • Cosmetically concerning prominence
  • Failed closed reduction

Timing:

  • Not in young children (growth concerns)
  • Typically delayed until 4-6 years if symptomatic
  • Often performed with one-bone forearm

Technique:

  • Boyd approach to radial head
  • Complete excision including neck
  • Preserve annular ligament remnant if present
  • Avoid ulnar nerve injury (if present)

Complications:

  • Proximal radial migration
  • Valgus deformity progression
  • Posterolateral rotatory instability (rare)

Syndactyly Release

Timing: Early for thumb-index, 6-18 months for others

Technique:

  • Standard syndactyly release principles
  • Dorsal and volar zigzag incisions
  • Full-thickness skin grafts to fill defects
  • Staged if multiple web spaces

Considerations in Ulnar Deficiency:

  • Often border digits (3-4 if present)
  • Neurovascular anatomy may be aberrant
  • Digital nerves may be shared
  • Bony fusion common at phalangeal level

Centralization Procedures

Rarely performed in ulnar deficiency compared to radial deficiency:

  • Radial deviation less severe than ulnar deviation in radial club hand
  • Soft tissue on radial side adequate
  • Focus on elbow stabilization instead

Indications:

  • Severe progressive radial carpal deviation
  • Failed non-operative management in Type II
  • Adequate ulnar remnant for stabilization

Technique (if performed):

  • Similar to radial deficiency centralization
  • Carpus centered over radius
  • Soft tissue rebalancing
  • Temporary K-wire fixation

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
Management algorithm for Ulnar Club Hand
Click to expand
Management algorithm for Ulnar Club HandCredit: OrthoVellum

Complications

Surgical Complications

Complications of Ulnar Deficiency Surgery

categorycomplicationincidencepreventionmanagementoutcome
Intra-operativeNeurovascular injuryLess than 5%Careful dissection, identify aberrant anatomyImmediate repair if recognized, vascular surgery consultGood if repaired primarily
Early Post-opWound dehiscence5-10%Tension-free closure, adequate soft tissueLocal wound care, possible revisionHeals with treatment
Early Post-opInfectionLess than 5%Pre-operative antibiotics, sterile techniqueAntibiotics, possible I&DUsually resolves with treatment
LateNonunion (one-bone forearm)5-10%Rigid fixation, adequate immobilizationRevision fixation, bone graftHigh success with revision
LateRecurrent deformity10-20%Adequate soft tissue release, balanced forcesRevision centralization, osteotomyVariable, may require multiple revisions
LateStiffness20-30%Early mobilization, therapyAggressive therapy, possible releaseImproves with treatment
Long-termGrowth disturbanceVariablePreserve epiphyses when possibleMonitor growth, osteotomy if neededMay require multiple procedures
Long-termDegenerative arthritisUnknown (long-term)Anatomic reconstruction, stable jointsActivity modification, possible arthrodesisMay limit function in adulthood

Specific Complications

One-Bone Forearm:

  • Loss of rotation: Expected outcome, not truly a complication
  • Malposition: If fused in excessive flexion/extension
  • Proximal radial migration: If radial head not addressed
  • Refracture: Through fusion site in active children

Syndactyly Release:

  • Web creep: Proximal migration of web space
  • Scar contracture: Limiting digital motion
  • Nail deformity: If germinal matrix damaged
  • Skin graft loss: Requiring revision grafting

Outcomes and Prognosis

Functional Outcomes

Unilateral Cases:

  • Excellent adaptation with contralateral normal limb
  • One-bone forearm provides stable platform
  • Most activities of daily living achieved independently
  • Sports participation usually possible with adaptation

Bilateral Cases:

  • Greater functional impact
  • Both limbs require optimization
  • Staging of surgeries important
  • May require more extensive adaptive equipment

Hand Function Determinants:

  • Thumb presence and function (most critical)
  • Number of digits present
  • First web space adequacy
  • Sensation in present digits
  • Wrist stability

Long-Term Outcomes

IV
📚 Goldfarb CA, Murtha YM, Gordon JE, Manske PR. Functional outcome after centralization for radius dysplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(8):1451-1457.
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Literature Review Findings:

  • Stability: One-bone forearm maintains stability in greater than 90% long-term
  • Function: Dependent on hand ray presence, not forearm length
  • Satisfaction: High in properly selected and counseled families
  • Revisions: 20-40% require secondary procedures
  • Independence: Greater than 90% achieve age-appropriate ADL independence

Predictors of Poor Outcome

  • Absent thumb (most significant predictor)
  • Bilateral severe involvement
  • Associated syndrome with global delays
  • Inadequate soft tissue envelope
  • Family non-compliance with therapy
  • Late presentation (greater than 3 years)

IV
📚 Manske PR, McCarroll HR Jr, James M. Type III-A hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(2):246-253.
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Evidence Base

IV
📚 Bayne LG, Klug MS. Long-term review of the surgical treatment of radial deficiencies. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12(2):169-179.
Key Findings:
  • One-bone forearm provides reliable stability for Type III-IV deficiency
  • Hand function preservation more important than forearm length
  • Classification system based on degree of ulnar absence
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

IV
📚 Dobyns JH, Wood VE, Bayne LG. Congenital hand deformities. In: Green DP, ed. Operative Hand Surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:251-448.
Key Findings:
  • Individualized treatment based on deficiency pattern
  • Multiple reconstructive options available
  • Technique selection depends on severity
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

IV
📚 Ogino T, Hikino K. Congenital ulnar deficiency: long-term outcome after treatment. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(7):1140-1147.
Key Findings:
  • One-bone forearm maintained stability in 95% at 18-year follow-up
  • Function primarily determined by thumb presence
  • High overall satisfaction despite loss of rotation
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

IV
📚 Cole RJ, Manske PR. Classification of ulnar deficiency according to the thumb and first web. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(4):479-488.
Key Findings:
  • Thumb and first web space deficiency are critical function determinants
  • Classification modification improves surgical planning
  • Early thumb reconstruction advocated when indicated
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

V
📚 Flatt AE. The Care of Congenital Hand Anomalies. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1994.
Key Findings:
  • Timing of surgery is critical
  • Technique selection based on severity
  • Realistic goal-setting with families essential
Clinical Implication: This evidence guides current practice.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOModerate

EXAMINER

"A 3-month-old infant is referred to your clinic with a right upper limb abnormality. On examination, the right forearm appears shortened with radial deviation of the hand. The 4th and 5th digits are absent, and there is syndactyly of the 2nd and 3rd digits. The parents ask about treatment options and prognosis."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is consistent with ulnar longitudinal deficiency (ulnar club hand). I would approach this systematically with assessment, investigations, and management planning: **Initial Assessment**: - Complete examination of both upper limbs - Document digit count and syndactyly pattern - Assess elbow stability and radial head position - Evaluate thumb function and first web space - Neurovascular examination, noting ulnar nerve status - Screen for associated anomalies **Investigations**: - Plain radiographs of forearm, elbow, and hand to classify by Bayne criteria - Consider MRI to assess soft tissues and cartilaginous structures in this young infant - Genetic consultation if syndromic features present - Echocardiogram if cardiac anomaly suspected **Classification**: Based on radiographic ulnar deficiency pattern (Bayne Types I-IV) **Management Planning**: - Observation for now with serial examinations and radiographs - Early referral to occupational therapy for developmental monitoring - Syndactyly release at 6-12 months if thumb-index involved, or 12-18 months for other digits - Definitive forearm reconstruction (likely one-bone forearm) at 12-24 months if Bayne Type III or IV - Family counseling regarding functional prognosis **Prognosis Discussion**: - Function depends primarily on thumb presence and stability - Unilateral involvement has excellent functional prognosis with adaptation - Loss of forearm rotation accepted trade-off for elbow stability - Multiple procedures likely required through growth - Most achieve age-appropriate independence in activities of daily living
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Systematic examination including contralateral limb and associated anomalies
Bayne classification guides surgical planning
Thumb function is primary determinant of overall hand function
Timing: syndactyly release 6-18 months, forearm reconstruction 12-24 months
One-bone forearm provides stability at expense of rotation
Realistic counseling about multiple procedures and long-term outcomes
COMMON TRAPS
✗Forgetting to examine contralateral limb and screen for bilateral involvement
✗Not considering syndromic associations (ulnar-mammary, Cornelia de Lange)
✗Attempting to maintain forearm rotation in severe cases (Type III-IV)
✗Promising early correction with splinting (ineffective in ulnar deficiency)
✗Overlooking thumb hypoplasia which dramatically affects function
✗Not involving occupational therapy early for developmental support
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"How does ulnar club hand differ from radial club hand in presentation and management?"
"What is the role of centralization procedures in ulnar deficiency?"
"Describe the one-bone forearm technique and its outcomes."
"What are the indications for radial head excision in this population?"
"How would you counsel parents about functional prognosis?"
"What associated syndromes would you screen for?"
VIVA SCENARIOModerate

EXAMINER

"You are seeing a 15-month-old child in pre-operative clinic for planned one-bone forearm procedure for Bayne Type IV ulnar deficiency. The parents ask you to explain the surgery, why their child needs it, and what to expect. Walk me through your discussion."

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
I would have a detailed discussion covering the rationale, procedure, risks, and outcomes: **Explaining the Condition**: - Their child has complete absence of the ulna bone (one of two forearm bones) - This causes elbow instability and abnormal positioning of the hand - The radius (remaining forearm bone) cannot provide stable forearm function alone - Without surgery, the elbow will remain unstable and hand positioning poor for function **Surgical Rationale**: - One-bone forearm creates a stable connection between humerus and hand - Sacrifices forearm rotation to gain elbow stability - Positions hand optimally for function - Provides stable platform for hand to work effectively **Procedure Description** (in parent-friendly terms): - We will make an incision from elbow to wrist - Remove the dislocated radial head at the elbow - Connect the radius bone to the arm bone (humerus) with rod or plate - Position the hand in best functional position (slightly bent, palm facing body) - This creates one stable bone unit instead of unstable two-bone forearm **Trade-offs**: - Gain stability, lose rotation - Child will not be able to rotate palm up/down (supination/pronation) - This is an accepted trade-off for functional stability - Most daily activities can be performed by positioning shoulder and elbow differently **Post-operative Course**: - Cast for 8-12 weeks until bones heal together - Serial X-rays to confirm bone healing - Occupational therapy to learn new movement patterns - Likely additional procedures in future (syndactyly, thumb reconstruction if needed) **Prognosis**: - Greater than 90% achieve stable elbow - Function depends on thumb and digit presence - Most children adapt very well and achieve independence - Unilateral involvement has excellent functional prognosis **Risks**: Standard surgical risks plus specific concerns about nerve injury, failure of bones to heal, infection, and need for revision surgery
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Explain in parent-friendly terms without excessive medical jargon
Clearly state trade-off: stability gained, rotation lost
Set realistic expectations about recovery and long-term needs
Emphasize functional goals rather than anatomic restoration
Discuss high success rate while acknowledging potential complications
Address likelihood of future procedures rather than presenting as one-time fix
COMMON TRAPS
✗Using technical terminology without explanation
✗Implying that rotation can be preserved (cannot in Type IV)
✗Oversimplifying: 'We will fix the arm'
✗Not discussing the permanence of rotation loss
✗Failing to set expectations about multiple future surgeries
✗Not addressing concerns about function with missing digits
✗Giving overly pessimistic or optimistic prognosis
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What position do you fuse the forearm in and why?"
"What are alternatives to one-bone forearm for this patient?"
"How do you manage a nonunion after one-bone forearm?"
"What determines the functional outcome more: forearm stability or hand digit presence?"
"When would you perform radial head excision?"
"How do you monitor for complications post-operatively?"

Australian Context

Service Delivery

Tertiary Centers:

  • Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne: Dedicated congenital upper limb service
  • Sydney Children's Hospital: Pediatric hand surgery unit
  • Queensland Children's Hospital: Pediatric orthopaedic and hand surgery
  • Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide: Specialized limb reconstruction service
  • Perth Children's Hospital: Pediatric hand and upper limb surgery

Multidisciplinary Teams:

  • Pediatric orthopaedic/hand surgeons
  • Occupational therapists specialized in pediatrics
  • Clinical geneticists
  • Prosthetists/orthotists
  • Social workers
  • Psychologists for adjustment support

Funding and Support

Public System Coverage:

  • Surgical procedures covered under public hospital system
  • Pollicization, osteotomy, and centralization procedures fully funded
  • Tertiary pediatric centers manage complex cases

NDIS Funding:

  • Occupational therapy for functional training
  • Adaptive equipment and assistive devices
  • Capacity building supports
  • Early childhood early intervention (ECEI) pathway for children under 7

State-Based Support:

  • Varies by jurisdiction
  • Equipment programs through health departments
  • Transport assistance for rural families
  • Accommodation support for families traveling to tertiary centers

Prosthetic Services

Limited role in ulnar deficiency compared to transverse deficiencies:

  • Digit prostheses for absent 4th/5th fingers (cosmetic only)
  • Usually not functionally beneficial
  • Funded through NDIS or state programs
  • Custom fabrication by specialized prosthetists

Exam Day Cheat Sheet

MCQ Practice Points

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the Bayne classification for ulnar longitudinal deficiency (ulnar club hand)?

A: Bayne classification (4 types): Type I: Hypoplasia - ulna short but present; Type II: Partial aplasia - only proximal ulna present; Type III: Total aplasia - complete absence of ulna, radiohumeral synostosis common; Type IV: Radiohumeral synostosis with total ulnar aplasia. Additionally, the thumb and first web space are usually normal (unlike radial club hand). The more severe the ulnar deficiency, the greater the elbow involvement and the more likely associated digital anomalies (absent ulnar digits).

Exam Pearl

Q: What digital anomalies are commonly associated with ulnar longitudinal deficiency?

A: Ulnar-sided digital deficiencies include: absent or hypoplastic 4th and 5th digits (ulnar rays), syndactyly of remaining digits, thumb abnormalities (less common than in radial deficiency). The first web space is usually adequate. Associated conditions include fibular hemimelia, scoliosis, proximal focal femoral deficiency. Unlike radial club hand, ulnar deficiency has fewer systemic associations - no VACTERL or thrombocytopenia-absent radius (TAR) syndrome. Function is often better preserved than radial deficiency.

Exam Pearl

Q: How does ulnar club hand differ from radial club hand in terms of function and prognosis?

A: Ulnar club hand generally has better function because: 1) Thumb is usually present and functional (essential for grip); 2) Elbow motion is often better despite potential radiohumeral synostosis; 3) Wrist deviation is less severe; 4) Fewer systemic anomalies. Radial club hand has worse prognosis due to absent thumb, severe radial wrist deviation, elbow stiffness, and associated syndromes (VACTERL, TAR, Fanconi anemia, Holt-Oram). Ulnar deficiency is approximately 10 times rarer than radial deficiency.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is the surgical management approach for ulnar club hand?

A: Surgery is less commonly required than for radial club hand. Options depend on type: Syndactyly release for fused digits; First web space deepening if contracted; Rotational osteotomy of radius for severe forearm pronation deformity; Radiohumeral synostosis release rarely indicated (often worsens stability); Ulnar anlage resection (fibrous band tethering radius) may improve forearm rotation. Function is often adequate without intervention. Goals are improving grip strength and cosmesis rather than correcting wrist alignment.

Exam Pearl

Q: What is a fibrocartilaginous anlage and what is its clinical significance in ulnar club hand?

A: The anlage is a fibrocartilaginous remnant of the absent ulna that acts as a tether during growth, causing progressive radial bowing and forearm deformity. It connects the distal humerus to the carpus or ulnar digits. Clinical significance: 1) Progressive deformity with growth (worse during growth spurts); 2) Limitation of forearm rotation; 3) May require excision if causing progressive bowing. However, anlage excision risks destabilizing the wrist. Decision to excise depends on rate of deformity progression and functional limitations.

High-Yield Exam Summary

One-Liner Definition

  • •Ulnar club hand is a spectrum of congenital longitudinal upper limb deficiencies
  • •Involves partial or complete absence of the ulna
  • •Causes radial deviation of the hand
  • •Often presents with absent ulnar digits and elbow instability

Classification - Bayne and Klug

  • •Type I: Hypoplastic ulna (observe)
  • •Type II: Partial absence, middle segment (variable treatment)
  • •Type III: Complete absence except distal (one-bone forearm)
  • •Type IV: Complete absence (one-bone forearm mandatory)
  • •Cole-Manske adds A-D for thumb/first web involvement

Clinical Triad

  • •Radial deviation of hand (opposite to radial club hand)
  • •Absent 4th and 5th digits (common)
  • •Radial head dislocation with elbow instability (40-50% of cases)

Key Examination Findings

  • •Shortened forearm with radial hand deviation
  • •Absent ulnar-sided digits with syndactyly (50-60%)
  • •Palpable posterolateral radial head
  • •Ulnar border soft tissue deficiency
  • •Limited forearm rotation
  • •Thumb hypoplasia (20-30%)

Investigations

  • •Plain radiographs (forearm AP/lateral, hand AP, elbow AP/lateral)
  • •MRI in infancy for soft tissue assessment
  • •Genetic testing if syndromic features
  • •Fanconi anemia screening if bilateral

Management Algorithm

  • •Type I: Observe, rarely needs surgery
  • •Type II: Variable (soft tissue release vs. one-bone forearm)
  • •Type III-IV: One-bone forearm at 12-24 months
  • •Syndactyly release 6-18 months
  • •Thumb reconstruction if needed
  • •Radial head excision if symptomatic

One-Bone Forearm Principles

  • •Indications: Bayne III-IV with unstable elbow
  • •Technique: Excise radial head, fuse radius to humerus with rod/plate
  • •Position 20-30° flexion, neutral rotation
  • •Trade-off: Gain stability, lose rotation (accepted)
  • •Union rate greater than 90%

Surgical Timing

  • •Syndactyly release: 6-18 months (thumb-index by 6 months)
  • •One-bone forearm: 12-24 months
  • •Radial head excision: 4-6 years if symptomatic
  • •Thumb reconstruction: Variable based on severity

Prognosis Determinants

  • •Thumb function (most critical)
  • •Digit number/function
  • •Wrist stability
  • •Unilateral vs bilateral involvement
  • •Associated anomalies and family support/therapy compliance
  • •Greater than 90% achieve ADL independence with unilateral involvement

Common Viva Questions

  • •Difference from radial club hand? (Less common, radial deviation, ulnar digits absent, less syndromic association)
  • •Why sacrifice rotation? (Stability priority for hand function platform)
  • •Alternatives to one-bone forearm? (None effective for Type III-IV)
  • •What determines function? (Thumb presence)

Pearls and Pitfalls

  • •PEARL: Thumb function determines overall outcome
  • •PEARL: One-bone forearm very reliable for stability
  • •PEARL: Early OT involvement critical
  • •PITFALL: Attempting to preserve rotation in Type III-IV
  • •PITFALL: Not screening for syndromes
  • •PITFALL: Late presentation (greater than 3 years)
  • •PITFALL: Inadequate family counseling about rotation loss

Australian Context

  • •Tertiary pediatric centers (RCH Melbourne, SCH Sydney, QCH Brisbane)
  • •Surgical procedures covered under public system
  • •NDIS funding for OT and equipment
  • •Multidisciplinary team approach standard

Summary

Ulnar club hand (ulnar longitudinal deficiency) is a congenital spectrum disorder involving partial or complete absence of the ulna. It is less common than radial club hand (1 in 100,000 vs 1 in 30,000) and presents with characteristic radial deviation of the hand, often with absent 4th and 5th digits and elbow instability due to radial head dislocation.

The Bayne and Klug classification (Types I-IV based on degree of ulnar absence) guides management, with the Cole-Manske modification adding consideration of thumb and first web involvement. Type I (hypoplastic ulna) rarely requires surgery, while Types III-IV (complete or near-complete absence) typically require one-bone forearm reconstruction.

The one-bone forearm procedure (radius fused to humerus) sacrifices rotation to gain stability, providing a stable platform for hand function. Performed at 12-24 months of age, this procedure achieves union in greater than 90% and maintains long-term elbow stability in greater than 90% of cases. The trade-off of losing forearm rotation is accepted for functional stability.

Thumb function is the primary determinant of overall hand function, more so than forearm stability or length. Associated syndactyly (50-60% of cases) requires release at 6-18 months. Radial head excision may be needed if painful or blocking motion.

Prognosis is generally excellent for unilateral involvement, with greater than 90% achieving age-appropriate independence in activities of daily living. Multidisciplinary team management including pediatric hand surgeon, occupational therapist, and genetic counseling is essential for optimal outcomes.

Quick Stats
Reading Time96 min
Related Topics

Anterior Interosseous Syndrome

Camptodactyly

Central Slip Injuries

Crystalline Arthropathy of the Hand