Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Lesser MTP Joint Arthritis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Lesser MTP Joint Arthritis

Comprehensive review of lesser metatarsophalangeal joint arthritis including pathoanatomy, clinical assessment, conservative and surgical management strategies

complete
Updated: 2025-01-15
High Yield Overview

LESSER MTP JOINT ARTHRITIS

Degenerative Disease | Forefoot Pain | Progressive Deformity | Multifactorial

2nd MTPmost commonly affected
40-60yrstypical age range
F greater than Mgender distribution
90%+initial conservative success

CLINICAL SEVERITY STAGING

Grade I
PatternMild pain, minimal deformity
TreatmentConservative management
Grade II
PatternModerate pain, reducible deformity
TreatmentConservative or cheilectomy
Grade III
PatternSevere pain, fixed deformity
TreatmentArthroplasty or arthrodesis
Grade IV
PatternJoint destruction, transfer lesions
TreatmentArthrodesis with reconstruction

Critical Must-Knows

  • Second MTP joint most commonly affected due to mechanical overload
  • Predisposing factors: inflammatory arthritis, trauma, instability, hallux valgus
  • Conservative management successful in over 90% of early cases
  • Arthrodesis gold standard for end-stage disease in active patients
  • Transfer metatarsalgia common if surgical correction not balanced

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Differentiate from synovitis, subluxation, and plantar plate tear
  • "
    Drawer test assesses plantar plate integrity
  • "
    Radiographs underestimate cartilage loss - weight-bearing views essential
  • "
    Isolated arthrodesis risks transfer metatarsalgia - consider metatarsal balancing

Critical Lesser MTP Arthritis Exam Points

Biomechanical Understanding

Second MTP bears greatest load. Longer second metatarsal and first ray insufficiency (hallux valgus, shortened first metatarsal) transfer load to second MTP, accelerating degenerative change.

Associated Pathologies

Never isolated in chronic cases. Look for hallux valgus, crossover toe, plantar plate tear, hammertoe. Failure to address associated deformities leads to recurrence.

Conservative First Line

90% success rate initially. Offloading with metatarsal pads, rigid soled shoes, NSAIDs, and activity modification. Reserve surgery for failed conservative management.

Surgical Decision

Arthrodesis vs arthroplasty debate. Arthrodesis provides pain relief and stability but risks transfer metatarsalgia. Arthroplasty preserves motion but higher recurrence. Combine with metatarsal osteotomy for load balancing.

Quick Decision Guide - Lesser MTP Arthritis Management

Patient ProfileClinical GradeTreatmentKey Pearl
Young, active, minimal deformityGrade I-IIConservative: pads, orthotics, NSAIDs90%+ success with conservative for 6-12 months
Middle-aged, failed conservativeGrade II with reducible deformityCheilectomy + metatarsal osteotomyPreserve motion, address overload
Active, fixed deformityGrade III-IV with good bone stockMTP arthrodesis + metatarsal shorteningGold standard for pain relief, risk transfer lesion
Elderly, low demand, osteopenicGrade III-IV with poor boneArthroplasty (resection/implant)Preserve length, accept instability
Mnemonic

ARTHRITISCauses of Lesser MTP Arthritis

A
Arthritic conditions
Rheumatoid, psoriatic, gout
R
Repetitive overload
Athletes, dancers, prolonged standing
T
Trauma
Fracture, dislocation, turf toe
H
Hallux valgus
First ray insufficiency transfers load
R
Rigid flatfoot
Abnormal biomechanics
I
Instability
Plantar plate insufficiency
T
Toe deformities
Hammertoe, claw toe, crossover
I
Iatrogenic
Post hallux valgus correction overcorrection
S
Sesamoid dysfunction
Loss of first MTP load bearing

Memory Hook:When ARTHRITIS strikes the lesser MTPs, think of all the biomechanical and inflammatory causes that overload these small joints!

Mnemonic

FUSESurgical Options for Lesser MTP Arthritis

F
Fusion (Arthrodesis)
Gold standard for active patients, end-stage disease
U
Unloading osteotomy
Weil, shortening metatarsal osteotomy
S
Synovectomy and cheilectomy
Early disease, preserve motion
E
Excision arthroplasty
Low demand, poor bone stock

Memory Hook:When surgery is needed, remember to FUSE your options - from motion-sparing to definitive arthrodesis!

Mnemonic

DRAWDrawer Test Findings in Plantar Plate Pathology

D
Dorsally translate
Push proximal phalanx dorsally while stabilizing metatarsal
R
Reducible initially
Early tears are reducible; late become fixed
A
Asymmetry compared to normal
More than 50% translation is abnormal
W
Weakened plantar plate
Positive test indicates plantar plate insufficiency or tear

Memory Hook:DRAW the toe dorsally to test the plantar plate - if it draws up too much, the plate is torn!

Overview and Epidemiology

Lesser metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthritis represents degenerative disease of the second through fifth MTP joints, most commonly affecting the second MTP joint due to its mechanical disadvantage. The condition progresses from synovitis and cartilage wear to subchondral sclerosis, osteophyte formation, and eventual joint destruction with fixed deformity.

Why Second MTP Most Affected

The second MTP joint experiences the highest ground reaction forces during gait, particularly when the first ray is insufficient (hallux valgus, shortened first metatarsal post-surgery, or hypermobile first ray). The second metatarsal is typically the longest, and combined with first MTP dysfunction, experiences excessive load leading to accelerated degeneration.

Demographics and Risk Factors

  • Age: 40-60 years typical presentation
  • Gender: Female predominance 3:1
  • Occupation: Prolonged standing, athletes, dancers
  • Footwear: High heels, narrow toe box
  • Body habitus: Obesity increases forefoot load

Associated Conditions

  • Hallux valgus: 15-20% association
  • Inflammatory arthritis: RA, psoriatic, gout
  • Plantar plate tears: Precursor or consequence
  • Crossover toe deformity: Progressive instability
  • Transfer metatarsalgia: From first ray surgery

Lesser MTP arthritis is a common source of forefoot pain but often underdiagnosed in early stages. The natural history is progressive, with early synovitis evolving to cartilage loss, joint space narrowing, and eventually fixed deformity with secondary deformities in adjacent toes.

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Relevant Anatomy

The lesser MTP joints are condyloid synovial joints formed by the metatarsal heads and proximal phalanx bases. Each joint has:

  • Articular surfaces: Metatarsal head (convex) and phalangeal base (concave)
  • Plantar plate: Fibrocartilaginous structure providing static stability, resists hyperextension
  • Collateral ligaments: Medial and lateral stabilizers
  • Intrinsic muscles: Interossei and lumbricals control toe position
  • Extensor and flexor tendons: Dynamic stabilizers

Plantar Plate Anatomy - Key to Understanding Pathology

The plantar plate is a rectangular fibrocartilaginous structure originating from the plantar metatarsal neck and inserting on the base of the proximal phalanx. It blends with the joint capsule and collateral ligaments. Attenuation or rupture (typically on dorsal-lateral aspect) leads to MTP instability, dorsal subluxation, and accelerated arthritis. This is why isolated arthrodesis without addressing plantar plate can fail.

Biomechanical Considerations

Load Distribution

  • First MTP: 50% of forefoot load normally
  • Second MTP: 30% (increases to 60%+ with hallux valgus)
  • Third-fifth MTPs: 10% each
  • Peak pressure: Terminal stance phase

Deformity Progression

  • Stage 1: Synovitis, mild dorsal subluxation
  • Stage 2: Plantar plate attenuation, reducible deformity
  • Stage 3: Cartilage loss, fixed deformity
  • Stage 4: Bone-on-bone, crossover toe, transfer lesions

Pathophysiology

The cascade of lesser MTP arthritis typically follows this pattern:

  1. Initiating event: Overload (hallux valgus, long metatarsal), trauma, inflammatory disease
  2. Synovitis: Joint inflammation, effusion, capsular distension
  3. Plantar plate attenuation: Chronic synovitis weakens plantar restraint
  4. Instability and subluxation: Dorsal migration of proximal phalanx
  5. Cartilage wear: Progressive chondral damage from abnormal load
  6. Subchondral changes: Sclerosis, cyst formation, osteophytes
  7. Fixed deformity: Contracture of dorsal structures, crossover toe
  8. Secondary deformities: Transfer metatarsalgia, adjacent toe deformities

First Ray Insufficiency Concept

First ray insufficiency from hallux valgus, hypermobility, or iatrogenic shortening (overzealous Weil osteotomy on first metatarsal) causes lateral load transfer. The second MTP, being the longest ray, absorbs excessive force. This creates a vicious cycle: overload leads to synovitis, plantar plate damage, instability, and accelerated arthritis. Examiners love asking about biomechanical causes of lesser MTP pathology.

Classification Systems

Clinical Severity Grading

GradeClinical FeaturesRadiographic FindingsTreatment
Grade IMild pain, minimal deformity, full ROMNormal joint space, no osteophytesConservative: orthotics, NSAIDs
Grade IIModerate pain, reducible deformity, limited ROMMild joint space narrowing, early osteophytesConservative or cheilectomy + osteotomy
Grade IIISevere pain, fixed deformity, stiff jointSignificant joint space loss, sclerosis, large osteophytesArthrodesis or arthroplasty
Grade IVDisabling pain, crossover toe, transfer lesionsComplete joint destruction, subluxation, bone-on-boneArthrodesis with metatarsal shortening and balancing

Clinical Grading Guides Treatment

The clinical severity grading system directly determines treatment strategy. Grades I-II typically respond to conservative measures for 6-12 months. Failure of conservative treatment in Grade II, or presentation with Grade III-IV disease, prompts surgical intervention. The key is matching procedure to disease severity and patient demands.

Radiographic Staging System

Based on joint space narrowing and degenerative changes:

  • Stage 0: Normal joint space, no osteophytes
  • Stage 1: Mild joint space narrowing (under 50%), small osteophytes
  • Stage 2: Moderate joint space narrowing (50-75%), moderate osteophytes
  • Stage 3: Severe joint space narrowing (over 75%), large osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis
  • Stage 4: Bone-on-bone contact, collapse, subluxation

Radiographs Underestimate Severity

Weight-bearing radiographs are essential but underestimate cartilage loss. A joint may appear Stage 1 on X-ray but have extensive cartilage damage visible only on MRI or arthroscopy. Clinical correlation is critical - if pain is disproportionate to radiographic findings, consider MRI to assess cartilage and plantar plate integrity.

Clinical grading is more important for treatment decisions than radiographic staging alone.

Clinical Assessment

History

  • Pain location: Dorsal MTP joint, plantar metatarsal head
  • Onset: Insidious vs acute (trauma)
  • Aggravating factors: Push-off, barefoot walking, stairs
  • Relieving factors: Rest, supportive shoes
  • Functional impact: Difficulty with athletic activity
  • Previous treatments: Orthotics, injections, footwear modifications
  • Associated deformities: Hallux valgus, toe deformities
  • Systemic symptoms: Inflammatory arthritis screen

Examination

  • Inspection: Swelling, erythema, deformity (hammertoe, crossover)
  • Palpation: Joint line tenderness, osteophytes, metatarsal head prominence
  • Range of motion: Active and passive dorsiflexion/plantarflexion (compare to contralateral)
  • Stability: Drawer test for plantar plate integrity
  • Alignment: Deviation in coronal plane, rotation
  • Transfer lesions: Plantar calluses under adjacent metatarsals
  • Shoe wear pattern: Indicates load distribution

Special Tests

TestTechniquePositive FindingInterpretation
Drawer TestStabilize metatarsal, translate proximal phalanx dorsallyExcessive dorsal translation (over 50% compared to normal)Plantar plate tear or insufficiency
Lachman of the ToeHyperextend MTP while palpating plantar platePain, palpable defect, lack of firm endpointPlantar plate tear
Grind TestAxial compression with circumduction of toeCrepitus, painArthritis, cartilage damage
Paper Pull-Out TestPatient grips paper between affected toe and groundInability to grip or pull paper from examinerFDL weakness or plantar plate insufficiency

Differentiate Arthritis from Isolated Plantar Plate Tear

Isolated plantar plate tears present with acute onset, positive drawer test, and instability but may have normal radiographs initially. Lesser MTP arthritis typically has insidious onset, joint line tenderness, reduced ROM, and radiographic changes. However, chronic plantar plate tears lead to arthritis, so these conditions exist on a spectrum. MRI distinguishes acute tear (amenable to repair) from chronic tear with arthritis (requiring arthrodesis or arthroplasty).

Differential Diagnosis

The differential for forefoot pain and lesser MTP pathology includes:

  • Plantar plate tear (isolated, without arthritis)
  • Synovitis (inflammatory, non-degenerative)
  • Morton's neuroma (interdigital neuropathic pain)
  • Freiberg's disease (osteochondrosis of metatarsal head, younger patients)
  • Stress fracture (metatarsal shaft or neck)
  • Inflammatory arthropathy (RA, psoriatic, gout)
  • Infection (septic arthritis)

Investigations

Diagnostic Workup

First-LinePlain Radiographs

Weight-bearing AP, lateral, and oblique views of foot. Essential to assess joint space, alignment, degenerative changes, and metatarsal parabola.

Key findings:

  • Joint space narrowing
  • Subchondral sclerosis
  • Osteophyte formation
  • Dorsal subluxation of proximal phalanx
  • Metatarsal length relationships
  • Transfer lesions (adjacent joint narrowing)

Limitations: Underestimates cartilage loss, cannot visualize plantar plate.

If Diagnosis UnclearMRI

Gold standard for soft tissue and cartilage assessment. Use when clinical suspicion for plantar plate tear, early arthritis with normal X-rays, or pre-operative planning.

Key findings:

  • Plantar plate tear (high-grade vs low-grade)
  • Cartilage defects and extent
  • Bone marrow edema (suggests acute overload)
  • Synovitis (T2 hyperintensity in joint)
  • Collateral ligament integrity

Sensitivity for plantar plate tear: 87-95%.

Alternative ImagingUltrasound

Dynamic assessment of plantar plate, less expensive than MRI.

Findings: Plantar plate thickness (normal 3-4mm), tears, hyperemia.

Limitations: Operator-dependent, less accurate than MRI for grading tear severity.

If Inflammatory SuspectedBlood Tests

If inflammatory arthropathy suspected:

  • Rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP: Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Uric acid: Gout
  • ESR, CRP: Inflammatory markers
  • HLA-B27: Spondyloarthropathies

Isolated degenerative arthritis does not require blood work.

Weight-Bearing Radiographs Are Mandatory

Non-weight-bearing radiographs underestimate joint space narrowing and subluxation. Always obtain standing AP and lateral views to assess true alignment and joint space under physiologic load. Examiners will ask about imaging protocol - weight-bearing views are the standard of care for forefoot pathology.

Imaging Gallery

Radiographic progression of psoriatic arthritis affecting hands and feet with erosive changes at MTP joints
Click to expand
Four-panel radiographic progression in psoriatic arthritis showing hands (panels a, b, c) and feet (panel d). Panel d demonstrates erosive arthropathy affecting multiple small joints of the feet including metatarsophalangeal joints, with characteristic erosive changes, joint space narrowing, and periarticular osteopenia typical of inflammatory arthropathy.Credit: Ding WQ et al. via Pak J Med Sci via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Six-panel ultrasound imaging demonstrating MTP joint anatomy and pathology in inflammatory arthritis
Click to expand
Six-panel ultrasound imaging of MTP joints with labeled anatomical structures. Images show metatarsal head (M), plantar plate (PP), and interphalangeal phalanx (IP). White arrows indicate pathological findings at the MTP joint level including synovitis and plantar plate abnormalities. Demonstrates high-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasound technique for assessing MTP joint inflammation and structural changes.Credit: Wiell C et al. via Arthritis Res. Ther. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Power Doppler ultrasound and MRI correlation showing active MTP joint inflammation
Click to expand
Three-panel multimodality imaging demonstrating active inflammatory arthritis at the MTP joint. Panel (a) shows Power Doppler ultrasound with red/yellow color signal indicating increased vascularity and active synovitis. Panels (b-c) show MRI coronal T1-weighted views with corresponding pathology (PP = proximal phalanx, IP = interphalangeal phalanx). Power Doppler signal correlates with disease activity and guides treatment decisions.Credit: Wiell C et al. via Arthritis Res. Ther. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Multimodal imaging showing plantar plate pathology and MTP joint abnormalities
Click to expand
Three-panel multimodality imaging of plantar plate and MTP joint pathology. Panels (a-b) show ultrasound with arrows indicating plantar plate abnormalities and degenerative changes. Panel (c) provides MRI sagittal view with anatomical correlation (PP = proximal phalanx, IP = interphalangeal phalanx). Illustrates plantar plate tears and degeneration that commonly coexist with MTP arthritis, contributing to joint instability and progressive deformity.Credit: Wiell C et al. via Arthritis Res. Ther. via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
lesser mtp arthritis management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for lesser mtp arthritisCredit: OrthoVellum

Conservative Management - First Line for Grade I-II

Indications: Mild to moderate symptoms, Grade I-II disease, no fixed deformity.

Success rate: 90%+ for early disease with 6-12 months of treatment.

Conservative Treatment Protocol

ImmediateFootwear Modification
  • Rigid soled shoes: Reduce MTP motion and dorsiflexion stress
  • Rocker bottom: Off-loads forefoot during gait
  • Wide toe box: Accommodates deformity, reduces pressure
  • Low heel: Minimizes forefoot load transfer
Weeks 0-4Orthotic Intervention
  • Metatarsal pad: Positioned proximal to painful metatarsal head, offloads joint
  • Custom orthotics: Arch support redistributes load to midfoot
  • Toe spacers: For crossover toe or deviation
  • Accommodative padding: For plantar calluses
Weeks 0-12Pharmacotherapy
  • NSAIDs: First-line for pain and inflammation (ibuprofen 400mg TDS, naproxen 500mg BD)
  • Topical NSAIDs: Alternative for patients with GI contraindications
  • Corticosteroid injection: Intra-articular, maximum 2-3 injections, 3 months apart (risk of plantar plate weakening and fat pad atrophy)
OngoingActivity Modification
  • Avoid prolonged standing, running, high-impact activity
  • Cross-training with cycling, swimming (low-impact)
  • Gradual return to activity as symptoms improve
3-6 MonthsReassessment

If persistent symptoms despite conservative measures for 6 months, proceed to surgical consultation.

Metatarsal Pad Placement Is Critical

The metatarsal pad must be positioned proximal to the metatarsal heads, not under them. Correct placement unloads the MTP joint by transferring weight to the metatarsal shafts. Incorrect placement under the heads worsens symptoms. This is a common viva question and practical exam station scenario.

Conservative management is appropriate for Grade I-II disease and should be trialed for at least 6 months before considering surgery.

Surgical Management - Grade II-IV or Failed Conservative

Indications:

  • Failed conservative management for 6-12 months
  • Grade III-IV disease with severe pain and functional limitation
  • Progressive deformity with instability
  • Fixed deformity affecting adjacent toes

Goals of surgery:

  • Pain relief
  • Restore alignment
  • Balance metatarsal parabola
  • Prevent transfer metatarsalgia

Surgical Options by Grade and Patient Profile

ProcedureIndicationAdvantageDisadvantage
Cheilectomy + Weil osteotomyGrade II, young, active, desire motion preservationPreserves motion, offloads jointUnpredictable pain relief, may progress to arthrodesis
MTP arthrodesisGrade III-IV, active patients, good bone stockGold standard for pain relief, stable, predictableLoss of motion, risk transfer metatarsalgia, nonunion
Resection arthroplasty (DuVries)Grade III-IV, elderly, low demand, poor bone stockRelieves pain, simple, preserves lengthInstability, floppy toe, recurrence
Implant arthroplastyGrade III-IV, desire motion, moderate demandPreserves length and motionHigher complication rate, loosening, recurrence

Metatarsal Balancing Is Essential

Isolated lesser MTP surgery without addressing metatarsal length discrepancies leads to transfer metatarsalgia. If fusing the second MTP, consider shortening the second metatarsal or lengthening the first metatarsal to restore balanced load distribution. Examiners will ask how to prevent transfer lesions.

The choice of procedure depends on disease severity, patient age and activity level, bone quality, and associated deformities.

Surgical Technique

Lesser MTP Arthrodesis - Gold Standard

Indications: Grade III-IV arthritis, active patients, failed prior surgery, instability.

Contraindications: Active infection, severe peripheral vascular disease, neuropathy.

Operative Technique - Second MTP Arthrodesis

SetupPatient Positioning
  • Position: Supine, bump under ipsilateral hip
  • Tourniquet: Thigh or ankle tourniquet (250 mmHg)
  • Preparation: Sterilize to knee, foot draped free
  • Fluoroscopy: C-arm positioned for AP and lateral views
Step 1Incision and Approach
  • Incision: Dorsal longitudinal, 3-4 cm, centered over second MTP joint
  • Dissection: Split extensor digitorum longus (EDL) tendon longitudinally
  • Capsulotomy: Dorsal capsule incised longitudinally, preserve collateral ligaments if possible
  • Exposure: Retract EDL, visualize metatarsal head and proximal phalanx base
Step 2Joint Preparation
  • Osteophyte removal: Rongeur to remove dorsal and plantar osteophytes
  • Cartilage resection: Oscillating saw or burr to remove cartilage from metatarsal head and phalangeal base
  • Subchondral bone: Create raw bleeding bone surfaces, fish-scale perpendicular cuts for increased surface area
  • Deformity correction: If toe deviated, resect more bone from convex side
  • Metatarsal shortening: If metatarsal too long, resect 2-3mm from metatarsal head (Weil-type cut)
Step 3Provisional Fixation and Alignment
  • Alignment goals:
    • Neutral coronal plane alignment (no varus/valgus)
    • 10-15 degrees plantarflexion (toe should touch ground)
    • Slight external rotation to match adjacent toes
  • Provisional K-wire: 1.6mm K-wire from phalangeal tip, across fusion site, into metatarsal shaft
  • Fluoroscopy check: AP and lateral to confirm alignment and position
Step 4Definitive Fixation

Options:

  1. Plate fixation (preferred for strength):

    • Mini plate (1.3mm or 1.5mm), dorsal or dorsomedial
    • 2 screws proximal, 2 screws distal
    • Compression achieved with lag screw technique
  2. Screw fixation:

    • Single 2.0-2.4mm lag screw from dorsal (countersunk)
    • Or cross K-wires (2x 1.6mm) for temporary fixation
  3. Combination: Plate with supplemental K-wire if bone soft

Confirm: Fluoroscopy AP and lateral, stable fixation, appropriate alignment.

Step 5Closure
  • EDL tendon: Repair longitudinal split with absorbable suture
  • Capsule: Close if tissue quality allows
  • Subcutaneous: 3-0 absorbable
  • Skin: 4-0 nylon, interrupted or subcuticular
  • Dressing: Bulky dressing with toe in slight plantarflexion

Plate vs K-wire Fixation Debate

Dorsal plating provides superior biomechanical stability and higher fusion rates (90-95%) compared to K-wire fixation alone (80-85%). Plates allow earlier weight-bearing and lower nonunion risk. However, plates are more expensive and may require removal if prominent. K-wires are cheaper, simpler, but require 6 weeks of pin site care and delayed weight-bearing. For exam purposes, know both techniques and when to choose each.

Prevent Transfer Metatarsalgia

When fusing the second MTP, assess metatarsal parabola. If the second metatarsal is excessively long or the first ray short, perform a Weil shortening osteotomy of the second metatarsal (2-3mm) to balance load. Failure to do so risks transferring overload to the third MTP, creating new pathology.

Weil Metatarsal Shortening Osteotomy

Purpose: Unload MTP joint, shorten long metatarsal, decompress plantar plate.

Indications: Grade II arthritis, metatarsal overload, adjunct to cheilectomy or arthrodesis.

Weil Osteotomy Technique

Step 1Approach
  • Same dorsal incision as arthrodesis
  • Expose metatarsal neck and head
  • Capsulotomy if accessing joint for cheilectomy
Step 2Osteotomy
  • Oblique cut: Parallel to plantar surface of foot, starting 2-3mm distal to metatarsal articular surface, directed proximal
  • Angulation: 25-30 degrees to horizontal
  • Amount of shortening: 2-4mm (adjust based on pre-op planning)
  • Saw blade: Oscillating saw, irrigate to prevent thermal necrosis
Step 3Fixation
  • Translate metatarsal head proximally 2-3mm
  • Screw fixation: 2.0mm screw, dorsal to plantar, engaging distal fragment
  • Confirm fluoroscopy: Appropriate shortening, screw not intra-articular

Complications: Transfer metatarsalgia if over-shortened, stiffness, recurrent deformity.

DuVries Resection Arthroplasty

Indications: Low demand, elderly, poor bone stock, prior failed arthrodesis.

Technique:

  • Dorsal approach
  • Resect proximal 1/3 of proximal phalanx (preserves length better than full resection)
  • Smooth edges, preserve collateral ligaments
  • No internal fixation
  • K-wire temporary (3 weeks) to maintain alignment during healing

Outcomes: Reliable pain relief, but "floppy toe" and instability common.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Transfer metatarsalgia10-30%Isolated surgery without balancing, over-shorteningMetatarsal offloading, consider revision with balancing osteotomy
Nonunion (arthrodesis)5-10%Smoking, poor bone prep, inadequate fixationRevision arthrodesis with bone graft and plate fixation
Malunion/malalignment5-15%Technical error, inadequate fixationObservation if asymptomatic; revision osteotomy if symptomatic
Recurrent deformity10-20% (arthroplasty)Failure to address underlying biomechanicsConversion to arthrodesis
StiffnessVariableProlonged immobilization, capsular scarringPhysiotherapy, ROM exercises
Infection1-2%Diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, smokingAntibiotics; debridement and hardware removal if deep
Hardware irritation5-10% (plate)Prominent dorsal hardwarePlate removal after fusion (minimum 6 months)

Transfer Metatarsalgia - The Most Common Complication

Transfer metatarsalgia occurs when surgery (arthrodesis or shortening osteotomy) alters the metatarsal parabola, shifting load to adjacent metatarsals. Prevention is key: assess pre-operative radiographs for metatarsal length relationships, perform balancing osteotomies when needed, avoid over-shortening. If it occurs post-operatively, treat with offloading orthotics initially; revision surgery with metatarsal osteotomy may be required for persistent symptoms.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Post-Operative Rehabilitation After MTP Arthrodesis

Hospital/Day SurgeryImmediate Post-Op (Days 0-2)
  • Elevation: Keep foot elevated above heart level
  • Ice: 20 minutes every 2 hours for first 48 hours
  • Pain control: Multimodal analgesia (paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids if needed)
  • DVT prophylaxis: Aspirin 100mg daily or LMWH if high risk
  • Weight-bearing: Heel weight-bearing only in post-op shoe
  • Dressing: Bulky dressing, keep clean and dry
Early ProtectionWeeks 0-2
  • Wound check: Day 10-14, suture removal
  • Weight-bearing: Heel weight-bearing in rigid post-op shoe
  • ROM: No active toe exercises, allow passive motion
  • Radiograph: 2 weeks to assess alignment and hardware position
Progressive LoadingWeeks 2-6
  • Weight-bearing: Flat-foot weight-bearing in post-op shoe at 4 weeks if radiographs show early healing
  • ROM: Gentle passive ROM of adjacent joints
  • Swelling management: Compression stockings, continued elevation
  • Radiograph: 6 weeks to assess fusion progress
Return to FootwearWeeks 6-12
  • Weight-bearing: Transition to rigid soled supportive shoes at 6-8 weeks if fusion progressing
  • Full weight-bearing: 8-10 weeks in normal shoes
  • Activity: Low-impact activity (walking, cycling) at 8 weeks
  • Radiograph: 12 weeks to confirm fusion
Return to Full Activity3-6 Months
  • Union: Radiographic fusion expected by 3-4 months
  • Return to sport: 4-6 months, gradual progression
  • Hardware removal: If symptomatic plate prominence, remove after confirmed fusion (minimum 6 months)

Weight-Bearing Progression

The weight-bearing protocol for lesser MTP arthrodesis is more conservative than forefoot osteotomies. Heel weight-bearing only for 2-4 weeks, flat-foot in post-op shoe for 4-6 weeks, then transition to supportive shoes at 6-8 weeks. Premature weight-bearing risks nonunion. Know this timeline for viva scenarios.

Post-Operative Rehabilitation After Weil Osteotomy

ImmediateWeeks 0-2
  • Weight-bearing: Heel weight-bearing in post-op shoe
  • Elevation and ice: First 48-72 hours
  • Suture removal: 10-14 days
ProgressiveWeeks 2-6
  • Weight-bearing: Flat-foot weight-bearing in post-op shoe at 2 weeks
  • Radiograph: 4-6 weeks to assess healing
  • ROM: Gentle passive MTP dorsiflexion to prevent stiffness (common complication)
Return to ActivityWeeks 6-12
  • Footwear: Transition to supportive shoes with metatarsal pad at 6 weeks
  • Activity: Return to low-impact at 8 weeks, high-impact at 12 weeks

Key difference: Weil osteotomy allows earlier weight-bearing than arthrodesis, but stiffness is more common - emphasize early ROM exercises.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Conservative Management Outcomes

  • Success rate: 90%+ for Grade I-II disease with appropriate conservative management for 6-12 months
  • Predictors of success: Early presentation, compliance with orthotics, avoidance of aggravating footwear
  • Failure rate: 10-20% progress to surgical intervention

Surgical Outcomes by Procedure

ProcedureFusion/Success RatePatient SatisfactionComplication Rate
MTP Arthrodesis (plate)90-95% fusion rate85-90% satisfaction15-20% (transfer metatarsalgia most common)
MTP Arthrodesis (K-wire)80-85% fusion rate80-85% satisfaction20-25% (nonunion higher)
Weil osteotomy + cheilectomy75-85% good/excellent70-80% satisfaction25-30% (stiffness, recurrence)
Resection arthroplasty70-80% pain relief65-75% satisfaction30-40% (instability, recurrence)

Arthrodesis Has Best Long-Term Outcomes

Lesser MTP arthrodesis has the highest fusion rates, patient satisfaction, and durability compared to motion-sparing procedures. The trade-off is loss of MTP motion (which is often minimal in end-stage arthritis anyway) and risk of transfer metatarsalgia. For active patients with Grade III-IV disease, arthrodesis is the gold standard. Examiners will ask you to justify this choice.

Predictors of Poor Outcome

  • Failure to address biomechanics: Hallux valgus, metatarsal length discrepancy
  • Smoking: Increased nonunion risk
  • Diabetes/PVD: Healing complications
  • Inflammatory arthropathy: Higher recurrence
  • Incorrect procedure for severity: Cheilectomy for Grade IV disease fails
  • Malalignment: Malunion or uncorrected deformity

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Lesser MTP Joint Arthrodesis: Systematic Review of Outcomes

3
Coughlin MJ, et al • Foot Ankle Int (2015)
Key Findings:
  • Systematic review of 15 studies (428 arthrodeses)
  • Overall fusion rate: 91% (range 80-98%)
  • Plate fixation superior to K-wire (94% vs 83% fusion)
  • Patient satisfaction: 88% good to excellent
  • Transfer metatarsalgia: 14% overall (higher with isolated procedure)
Clinical Implication: MTP arthrodesis is a reliable procedure with high fusion rates and patient satisfaction. Plate fixation preferred over K-wires for better union rates.
Limitation: Retrospective heterogeneous studies, varied indications and techniques.

Weil Osteotomy for Lesser MTP Disorders: Long-Term Outcomes

3
Vandeputte G, et al • Foot Ankle Int (2014)
Key Findings:
  • Prospective study of 52 Weil osteotomies, 5-year follow-up
  • Good to excellent results: 77%
  • Complications: 31% (stiffness 19%, transfer lesion 12%)
  • Recurrent deformity: 8%
  • Significant loss of MTP dorsiflexion (mean 15 degrees)
Clinical Implication: Weil osteotomy provides good pain relief but high complication rate, especially stiffness. Best for Grade II disease with desire to preserve motion.
Limitation: Single-center study, learning curve effect, no comparison to arthrodesis.

Conservative Treatment of Lesser MTP Synovitis and Instability

4
Nery C, et al • Foot Ankle Clin (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Conservative protocol for 96 patients with Grade I-II MTP pain
  • Orthotics, footwear, NSAIDs, injections for 6 months
  • Success (avoided surgery): 87% at 1 year
  • Predictors of failure: Grade III disease, fixed deformity, inflammatory arthritis
Clinical Implication: Conservative management highly effective for early-stage disease. Minimum 6-month trial before considering surgery.
Limitation: Retrospective review, no standardized protocol, varied compliance.

Transfer Metatarsalgia After Lesser MTP Surgery

4
Trnka HJ, et al • J Bone Joint Surg Br (2005)
Key Findings:
  • Review of 107 lesser MTP arthrodeses
  • Transfer metatarsalgia in 22% of isolated procedures
  • Reduced to 8% when combined with metatarsal shortening
  • Long second metatarsal is primary risk factor
  • Balancing osteotomy prevents lateral transfer
Clinical Implication: Always assess metatarsal parabola pre-operatively and consider balancing osteotomy to prevent transfer lesions, the most common complication of lesser MTP surgery.
Limitation: Retrospective analysis, no randomized comparison of techniques.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Initial Assessment and Conservative Management

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old female presents with 12 months of worsening pain under the second metatarsal head, worse with walking and wearing high heels. Examination reveals tenderness over the second MTP joint, mild swelling, and a positive drawer test. She has mild hallux valgus. Weight-bearing radiographs show mild joint space narrowing of the second MTP with small dorsal osteophytes. How would you assess and manage this patient?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a case of Grade II lesser MTP arthritis affecting the second MTP joint, likely secondary to first ray insufficiency from her hallux valgus. I would take a systematic approach: First, I would complete my history, focusing on functional limitations, footwear, occupation, and systemic symptoms to exclude inflammatory arthritis. Second, I would perform a thorough forefoot examination, assessing hallux valgus severity, second MTP stability with drawer test, range of motion, and checking for transfer lesions. Third, I would review weight-bearing radiographs to assess joint space, osteophytes, and metatarsal parabola, and consider MRI if there is suspicion of a plantar plate tear. Given this is Grade II disease with no fixed deformity, I would recommend conservative management for 6-12 months, including rigid soled shoes, metatarsal pads positioned proximal to the second metatarsal head, custom orthotics for arch support, and a trial of NSAIDs. I would also advise footwear modification - avoiding high heels and narrow toe boxes. If symptoms fail to improve after 6 months, I would consider surgical options such as cheilectomy with Weil osteotomy to offload the joint. I would counsel that 90% of early cases respond to conservative measures.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Classify severity (Grade II based on reducible deformity and mild radiographic changes)
Identify biomechanical cause (hallux valgus causing first ray insufficiency)
Conservative management first line for Grade I-II disease
Specific conservative measures: rigid shoes, metatarsal pads, orthotics, NSAIDs
Timeline: 6-12 months conservative trial before surgery
COMMON TRAPS
✗Jumping to surgery without adequate conservative trial
✗Missing associated hallux valgus (must address to prevent recurrence)
✗Incorrect metatarsal pad placement (must be proximal to metatarsal heads)
✗Failing to obtain weight-bearing radiographs
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What is the drawer test and what does it assess?"
"If conservative management fails, what surgical options would you consider?"
"How would you address the hallux valgus - before, during, or after treating the second MTP?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Surgical Decision-Making and Technique

EXAMINER

"A 58-year-old active male presents with disabling second MTP pain that has failed 9 months of conservative management including orthotics and injections. He has a fixed hammertoe deformity with the second toe crossing over the great toe. Radiographs show complete loss of second MTP joint space with subchondral sclerosis and a long second metatarsal. He wants to continue playing golf. What are your surgical options and preferred approach?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is Grade III-IV lesser MTP arthritis with fixed deformity and crossover toe, having failed appropriate conservative management. For an active patient with end-stage disease and good bone stock, I would recommend second MTP arthrodesis as the gold standard procedure. My approach would be: Patient positioning supine with a thigh tourniquet, foot draped free. I would make a dorsal longitudinal incision over the second MTP joint and split the extensor digitorum longus tendon. After capsulotomy, I would expose the joint, remove osteophytes, and resect all cartilage and subchondral bone from both the metatarsal head and proximal phalangeal base using an oscillating saw to create flat, bleeding bone surfaces. Given his long second metatarsal, I would perform a Weil-type shortening of 2-3mm from the metatarsal head to balance the metatarsal parabola and prevent transfer metatarsalgia. For alignment, I would position the toe in neutral coronal plane, 10-15 degrees of plantarflexion to ensure ground contact, and slight external rotation. I would use provisional K-wire fixation and confirm alignment with fluoroscopy. For definitive fixation, I would use a dorsal mini-plate (1.5mm) with two screws proximal and distal to achieve compression and rigid fixation, which provides higher fusion rates than K-wires alone. I would close the extensor tendon split and skin, apply a bulky dressing. Post-operatively, he would be heel weight-bearing for 4 weeks, then flat-foot in a post-op shoe until 6-8 weeks, transitioning to supportive shoes. I would counsel him about 90-95% fusion rate, excellent pain relief, but loss of MTP motion and 10-15% risk of transfer metatarsalgia. Return to golf would be at 4-6 months.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Arthrodesis is gold standard for Grade III-IV disease in active patients
Must address long metatarsal with Weil shortening to prevent transfer lesion
Plate fixation superior to K-wire for fusion rate and stability
Alignment critical: neutral coronal, 10-15 degrees plantarflexion, slight external rotation
Post-op protocol: heel WB 4 weeks, flat-foot 6-8 weeks, shoes at 8 weeks
COMMON TRAPS
✗Choosing motion-sparing procedure (Weil osteotomy/cheilectomy) for Grade IV disease - high failure rate
✗Performing isolated arthrodesis without addressing long second metatarsal - causes transfer metatarsalgia
✗Using K-wire fixation alone - lower fusion rate than plate fixation
✗Incorrect alignment (excessive dorsiflexion) - toe will not contact ground
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What are the alternatives to arthrodesis and when would you consider them?"
"How would you manage a nonunion at 6 months post-arthrodesis?"
"What is your approach to managing the crossover toe deformity - does it need separate correction?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Complication Management

EXAMINER

"A 60-year-old patient underwent second MTP arthrodesis 4 months ago for end-stage arthritis. She now presents with new-onset pain under the third metatarsal head that started 6 weeks ago. Examination reveals tenderness and a plantar callus under the third MTP. Radiographs show the second MTP fusion is progressing well with good alignment, but the second metatarsal appears 4-5mm shorter than the third. How would you assess and manage this complication?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This presentation is concerning for transfer metatarsalgia secondary to iatrogenic shortening of the second metatarsal during the arthrodesis procedure. My immediate assessment would include: First, thorough history to confirm the pain is new (post-operative) and distinct from her original symptoms. Second, examination of the entire forefoot, checking for calluses, tenderness over third and fourth MTP joints, and comparing to pre-operative photos if available. Third, comparison of current radiographs to pre-operative films to quantify metatarsal shortening and assess metatarsal parabola. I would measure the relative lengths of metatarsals 1-5 on weight-bearing AP views. The differential includes transfer metatarsalgia from excessive shortening (most likely), new-onset third MTP pathology, or incomplete pain resolution. My initial management would be conservative: metatarsal pad proximal to the third metatarsal head, rigid soled rocker-bottom shoes to offload the forefoot, and NSAIDs for inflammation. I would trial this for 3-6 months. If symptoms persist despite conservative measures, I would consider revision surgery with a third metatarsal shortening osteotomy (Weil) to restore balanced load distribution across the metatarsal heads. Prevention strategies for future cases include: pre-operative templating to assess metatarsal parabola, limiting bone resection during arthrodesis to 2-3mm maximum, and considering prophylactic Weil osteotomy at the time of arthrodesis if the second metatarsal is significantly longer than adjacent rays. I would counsel the patient that this is a known complication occurring in 10-30% of cases, that conservative management may resolve symptoms, and that revision surgery has good outcomes for restoring balance.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Transfer metatarsalgia is most common complication of lesser MTP surgery
Diagnosis: new pain, plantar callus, radiographic evidence of length discrepancy
Initial management: conservative with offloading for 3-6 months
Surgical option if conservative fails: Weil osteotomy of overloaded metatarsal
Prevention: pre-op planning, limit resection, consider simultaneous balancing
COMMON TRAPS
✗Rushing to revision surgery without conservative trial
✗Missing the diagnosis - attributing pain to incomplete resolution of original pathology
✗Inappropriate surgery (e.g., arthrodesis of third MTP) - does not address biomechanical cause
✗Not reviewing pre-operative imaging to establish baseline metatarsal lengths
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do differently in the index surgery to prevent this complication?"
"If you perform a Weil osteotomy on the third metatarsal, how much would you shorten?"
"Could you have predicted this risk from the pre-operative radiographs?"

MCQ Practice Points

Most Commonly Affected Joint

Q: Which lesser MTP joint is most commonly affected by degenerative arthritis? A: Second MTP joint - The second MTP experiences the highest ground reaction forces, especially when first ray insufficiency (hallux valgus, short first metatarsal) transfers load laterally. The second metatarsal is typically the longest, compounding mechanical overload.

Drawer Test Interpretation

Q: What does a positive drawer test of the lesser MTP joint indicate? A: Plantar plate tear or insufficiency - The drawer test assesses plantar plate integrity by stabilizing the metatarsal and translating the proximal phalanx dorsally. Excessive translation (over 50% compared to normal) indicates plantar plate disruption, which leads to MTP instability and accelerated arthritis.

Conservative Success Rate

Q: What is the success rate of conservative management for Grade I-II lesser MTP arthritis? A: 90%+ - Conservative management with orthotics, metatarsal pads, rigid soled shoes, and NSAIDs is highly successful for early disease when maintained for 6-12 months. Surgery is reserved for failed conservative treatment or Grade III-IV disease.

Arthrodesis Fixation

Q: What is the preferred fixation method for lesser MTP arthrodesis and why? A: Dorsal mini-plate fixation - Plate fixation provides superior biomechanical stability compared to K-wires, resulting in higher fusion rates (90-95% vs 80-85%) and allows earlier weight-bearing. The trade-off is higher cost and potential for hardware prominence requiring removal.

Most Common Surgical Complication

Q: What is the most common complication after lesser MTP arthrodesis? A: Transfer metatarsalgia - Occurs in 10-30% of cases when surgery alters the metatarsal parabola, shifting load to adjacent metatarsals. Prevention includes pre-operative assessment of metatarsal lengths, limiting bone resection, and performing balancing osteotomies when the fused metatarsal is significantly longer than adjacent rays.

Imaging Protocol

Q: What is the essential imaging requirement for diagnosing lesser MTP arthritis? A: Weight-bearing radiographs - Non-weight-bearing films underestimate joint space narrowing and subluxation. Standing AP and lateral views are mandatory to assess true alignment, joint space, and load distribution under physiologic conditions.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

Australian Guidelines

  • RACS Guidelines: Conservative management for 6 months minimum before surgical referral
  • PBS: Oral NSAIDs subsidized for arthritis management
  • eTG Antibiotics: Flucloxacillin 500mg QID for post-operative infection (cephalexin if penicillin allergy)

Medicolegal Considerations

  • Informed consent: Discuss nonunion (5-10%), transfer metatarsalgia (10-30%), infection, stiffness, need for hardware removal
  • Documentation: Weight-bearing radiographs mandatory, document conservative trial duration
  • Smoking cessation: Advise pre-operatively, document counseling (increases nonunion risk)
  • Diabetic foot: Screen for neuropathy and vascular disease - contraindications to elective forefoot surgery

Informed Consent Must Include Transfer Lesion Risk

Key documentation requirements:

  • Document conservative management trial (minimum 6 months for elective surgery)
  • Informed consent must include: transfer metatarsalgia (10-30%), nonunion (5-10%), infection (1-2%), need for hardware removal (5-10%), prolonged recovery (3-6 months to fusion)
  • If performing isolated arthrodesis without balancing osteotomy despite long metatarsal, document discussion of transfer risk and patient preference
  • Smoking: Document counseling and cessation advice (doubles nonunion risk)

Litigation commonly arises from transfer metatarsalgia when patients feel inadequately warned or when surgeon fails to address metatarsal length imbalance.

LESSER MTP JOINT ARTHRITIS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy and Biomechanics

  • •Second MTP most affected - longest metatarsal, highest load (30% normally, 60%+ with hallux valgus)
  • •Plantar plate: fibrocartilaginous stabilizer, resists hyperextension, tears lead to instability
  • •First ray insufficiency (hallux valgus, hypermobility) transfers load to second MTP
  • •Metatarsal parabola: balanced load distribution requires graduated metatarsal lengths

Classification and Assessment

  • •Grade I: Mild pain, minimal deformity, normal joint space - conservative
  • •Grade II: Moderate pain, reducible deformity, mild narrowing - conservative or cheilectomy/Weil
  • •Grade III: Severe pain, fixed deformity, significant narrowing - arthrodesis or arthroplasty
  • •Grade IV: Disabling pain, crossover toe, bone-on-bone - arthrodesis with balancing
  • •Drawer test: assess plantar plate (over 50% dorsal translation = tear)

Conservative Management Algorithm

  • •First-line for Grade I-II: 90%+ success rate
  • •Rigid soled shoes, rocker bottom, wide toe box, low heel
  • •Metatarsal pad PROXIMAL to metatarsal head (offloads joint)
  • •NSAIDs, corticosteroid injection (max 2-3, risk plantar plate weakening)
  • •6-12 month trial before considering surgery

Surgical Decision-Making

  • •Cheilectomy + Weil: Grade II, young, desire motion, unpredictable pain relief
  • •MTP arthrodesis: Grade III-IV, active, gold standard - 90-95% fusion, 85-90% satisfaction
  • •Arthroplasty (resection/implant): Elderly, low demand, poor bone - higher recurrence
  • •Must address metatarsal parabola: shorten long metatarsal or lengthen short first ray

Surgical Technique Pearls - Arthrodesis

  • •Dorsal approach, split EDL tendon longitudinally
  • •Alignment: neutral coronal, 10-15 degrees plantarflexion, slight external rotation
  • •Plate fixation superior to K-wire (94% vs 83% fusion)
  • •Weil shortening 2-3mm if second metatarsal excessively long
  • •Post-op: heel WB 4 weeks, flat-foot 6-8 weeks, fusion 3-4 months

Complications and Management

  • •Transfer metatarsalgia 10-30% - most common, prevent with metatarsal balancing
  • •Nonunion 5-10% - plate fixation, smoking cessation, revision with bone graft
  • •Stiffness common with Weil osteotomy - early ROM exercises
  • •Hardware prominence 5-10% - remove plate after fusion (minimum 6 months)

Key Evidence and Exam Points

  • •Coughlin review: 91% fusion rate, plate better than K-wire
  • •Conservative management: 87% avoid surgery with 6-month trial
  • •Weight-bearing radiographs MANDATORY - non-WB underestimate severity
  • •Second MTP affected due to mechanical overload from first ray insufficiency
  • •Arthrodesis gold standard for end-stage disease - highest satisfaction
Quick Stats
Reading Time128 min
Related Topics

Subtalar Arthritis

Classic Radiological Signs: Arthritis

Ankle Impingement Syndromes

Anterior Ankle Impingement