Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Knowledge Hub

Study

  • Topics
  • MCQs
  • ISAWE
  • Operative Surgery
  • Flashcards

Company

  • About Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA
  • Refund Policy

Support

  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
OrthoVellum

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not affiliated with the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Subtalar Arthritis

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Subtalar Arthritis

Degenerative arthritis of the subtalar joint causing hindfoot pain, loss of inversion/eversion, and altered gait mechanics

complete
Updated: 2025-12-24
High Yield Overview

SUBTALAR ARTHRITIS

Hindfoot Degeneration | Loss of Inversion/Eversion | Posttraumatic Most Common

70-80%Posttraumatic etiology
50%Intra-articular calcaneal fractures develop arthritis
20-30°Normal subtalar motion arc
85-90%Pain relief with arthrodesis

ETIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION

Posttraumatic
PatternPrior calcaneal or talar fracture
TreatmentMost common - 70-80% of cases
Primary OA
PatternIdiopathic degenerative change
TreatmentRare in isolation - usually associated
Inflammatory
PatternRheumatoid, psoriatic, seronegative
TreatmentSystemic disease management required
Coalition
PatternTarsal coalition with secondary changes
TreatmentConsider coalition resection if appropriate

Critical Must-Knows

  • Subtalar joint provides 20-30° of hindfoot inversion/eversion - critical for uneven ground
  • 70-80% are posttraumatic - most from calcaneal fractures with Bohler angle loss
  • Loss of motion causes compensatory midfoot stress - may develop adjacent arthritis
  • Isolated subtalar arthrodesis maintains 70-80% normal hindfoot motion via other joints
  • Triple arthrodesis gold standard for pantalocalcaneonavicular arthritis

Examiner's Pearls

  • "
    Gait shows lack of hindfoot inversion on uneven ground - patient walks stiffly
  • "
    Inject subtalar joint with local anesthetic under image guidance - diagnostic test
  • "
    Broden views (40° pronation, 10-40° cephalad tilt) visualize posterior facet best
  • "
    Isolated fusion preserves ankle and midfoot - better than triple for isolated disease

Clinical Imaging

Imaging Gallery

Diagnoses included in the study. (A) – Failed ankle fusion with subtalar arthritis. (B) – Degenerative arthritis of ankle and subtalar joint. (C) – Post – traumatic arthritis of ankle and subtalar joi
Click to expand
Diagnoses included in the study. (A) – Failed ankle fusion with subtalar arthritis. (B) – Degenerative arthritis of ankle and subtalar joint. (C) – PoCredit: Coughlin MJ et al. via Rev Bras Ortop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Lateral view of the Tornier Stabilis Ankle Arthrodesis Plating System® in a sawbone model.
Click to expand
Lateral view of the Tornier Stabilis Ankle Arthrodesis Plating System® in a sawbone model.Credit: Coughlin MJ et al. via Rev Bras Ortop via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Photographs during clinical examination. Posterior view of the feet with valgus deviation of left heel and torn tendon of tibialis posterior muscle.
Click to expand
Photographs during clinical examination. Posterior view of the feet with valgus deviation of left heel and torn tendon of tibialis posterior muscle.Credit: Popelka S et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))
Photographs during clinical examination. Photograph shows the medial view of the right flatfoot in case of torn tendon of tibialis posterior muscle.
Click to expand
Photographs during clinical examination. Photograph shows the medial view of the right flatfoot in case of torn tendon of tibialis posterior muscle.Credit: Popelka S et al. via BMC Musculoskelet Disord via Open-i (NIH) (Open Access (CC BY))

Critical Subtalar Arthritis Exam Points

Anatomy and Biomechanics

Three facets: anterior, middle, posterior. Posterior facet bears 70-80% load. Subtalar joint provides inversion/eversion for uneven ground adaptation. Loss causes compensatory midfoot stress and altered ankle mechanics.

Posttraumatic Etiology Dominance

70-80% are posttraumatic - most from calcaneal fractures. Bohler angle loss under 20° correlates with subtalar arthritis risk. Talar fractures involving posterior facet also high risk.

Diagnostic Injection Test

Fluoroscopy-guided subtalar injection with local anesthetic and steroid. If greater than 75% pain relief, confirms subtalar source. Essential to differentiate from ankle, midfoot, or sinus tarsi pathology.

Fusion Principles

Isolated arthrodesis for isolated disease. Triple arthrodesis for pantalocalcaneonavicular involvement. Preserve ankle joint at all costs. Malunion causes adjacent joint overload and deformity.

Subtalar Arthritis Quick Decision Guide

Clinical ScenarioJoints InvolvedTreatmentKey Pearl
Isolated subtalar arthritis, failed conservativeSubtalar joint onlyIsolated subtalar arthrodesisPreserves midfoot and ankle - 70-80% normal motion maintained
Subtalar plus talonavicular arthritisTwo of triple jointsDouble arthrodesis (subtalar + TN)Consider triple if calcaneocuboid borderline - avoid isolated midfoot stress
Posttraumatic with varus malunionSubtalar with hindfoot malalignmentArthrodesis plus deformity correctionMUST correct alignment - lateral column lengthening may be needed
Inflammatory arthritis, multiple joint involvementPantalocalcaneonavicularTriple arthrodesisCoordinate with rheumatology - optimize disease control perioperatively
Mnemonic

AMPSubtalar Joint Anatomy - Three Facets

A
Anterior facet
Smallest facet on talar head - shares joint with talonavicular
M
Middle facet
On sustentaculum tali - medial support structure
P
Posterior facet
Largest facet - bears 70-80% of load, most commonly arthritic

Memory Hook:AMP up the load - Posterior facet takes 70-80% of subtalar stress!

Mnemonic

ISOLATEDIndications for Isolated Subtalar Arthrodesis

I
Isolated subtalar disease
Confirmed on imaging and diagnostic injection
S
Subtalar pain focal
Sinus tarsi and lateral hindfoot pain localized
O
Other joints preserved
Ankle, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid intact
L
Loss of motion tolerable
Patient understands limitation on uneven ground
A
Alignment neutral or correctable
No fixed varus or valgus deformity
T
Trial of conservative failed
At least 6 months of non-operative treatment
E
Expectations realistic
Patient counseled about loss of inversion/eversion
D
Diagnostic block positive
Greater than 75% pain relief with injection confirms source

Memory Hook:Keep subtalar fusion ISOLATED - preserve adjacent joints for better function!

Mnemonic

NONUNIONComplications of Subtalar Arthrodesis

N
Nonunion
5-10% rate - risk higher in smokers and inflammatory arthritis
O
Overcorrection or undercorrection
Varus or valgus malunion causes adjacent joint stress
N
Nerve injury
Sural nerve at lateral incision - stay posterior to peroneal tendons
U
Underprepared surfaces
Inadequate cartilage removal prevents fusion
N
Non-anatomic alignment
Malposition alters mechanics - must restore 5° hindfoot valgus
I
Infection
1-3% superficial, less than 1% deep
O
Ongoing pain
Adjacent joint arthritis develops - ankle or midfoot overload
N
Neurovascular injury
Protect sural nerve, avoid drill penetration medially

Memory Hook:Avoid NONUNION - prepare surfaces well, correct alignment, preserve nerves!

Overview and Epidemiology

Subtalar arthritis is degenerative disease of the subtalar joint, most commonly arising after intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The subtalar joint complex consists of three facets (anterior, middle, posterior) between the talus and calcaneus, providing critical hindfoot inversion and eversion motion for walking on uneven ground.

Why Subtalar Arthritis Matters

The subtalar joint provides 20-30 degrees of hindfoot inversion and eversion, which is essential for adaptation to uneven terrain and normal gait mechanics. Loss of this motion causes compensatory stress at adjacent joints (ankle, midfoot) and significantly impairs function on slopes and irregular surfaces.

Demographics and Etiology

  • Age: 40-60 years peak incidence (posttraumatic)
  • Gender: Male greater than female (3:1) - reflects trauma pattern
  • Posttraumatic: 70-80% of cases - calcaneal fractures most common
  • Primary OA: Rare in isolation - usually associated with other hindfoot pathology
  • Inflammatory: Rheumatoid, psoriatic, seronegative arthropathy

Functional Impact

  • Gait: Stiff hindfoot, reduced shock absorption
  • Terrain: Difficulty on uneven ground, slopes, stairs
  • Compensation: Increased midfoot and ankle stress
  • Adjacent joints: Risk of secondary arthritis over time
  • Activity limitation: Running, hiking significantly impaired

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Subtalar Joint Anatomy - Three Facet Complex

The subtalar joint is anatomically complex with three articulating facets. The posterior facet bears 70-80% of the load and is most commonly involved in arthritis. The middle facet sits on the sustentaculum tali. The anterior facet is part of the talocalcaneonavicular joint complex. Understanding this anatomy is critical for surgical planning and approach selection.

Biomechanics

The subtalar joint provides primarily inversion and eversion motion (20-30 degrees total arc), which is coupled with:

  • Ankle dorsiflexion: Subtalar eversion unlocks the midfoot
  • Ankle plantarflexion: Subtalar inversion locks the midfoot
  • Shock absorption: Dampens impact forces during heel strike
  • Terrain adaptation: Allows foot to conform to uneven surfaces

Subtalar Joint Facets - Anatomy and Clinical Significance

FacetLocationLoad BearingClinical Significance
Posterior facetLarge facet on posterior calcaneus70-80% of subtalar loadMost commonly arthritic - primary surgical target
Middle facetSustentaculum tali (medial)15-20% of subtalar loadSupport structure - involved in coalition and inflammatory disease
Anterior facetTalar head (shares with TN joint)5-10% of subtalar loadContinuous with talonavicular joint - may have combined pathology

Pathophysiology

Posttraumatic Pathway

  • Calcaneal fracture: Intra-articular with joint surface incongruity
  • Bohler angle loss: Less than 20° correlates with arthritis risk
  • Cartilage damage: Direct injury plus abnormal loading
  • Malunion: Altered mechanics accelerate degeneration
  • Timeline: Symptoms typically develop 1-5 years post-injury

Primary and Inflammatory Pathway

  • Primary OA: Rare - usually associated with hindfoot malalignment
  • Inflammatory: Rheumatoid, psoriatic, ankylosing spondylitis
  • Coalition: Tarsal coalition with chronic abnormal stress
  • Biomechanical: Cavus or planovalgus deformity overload
  • Progression: Often involves multiple hindfoot joints

Classification and Grading

Etiological Classification

TypeEtiologyPercentageTreatment Considerations
PosttraumaticPrior calcaneal or talar fracture70-80%Most common - address malunion, correct alignment
Primary osteoarthritisIdiopathic degeneration10-15%Rare - rule out biomechanical causes
InflammatoryRheumatoid, psoriatic, seronegative5-10%Systemic disease management essential
Coalition-relatedTarsal coalition with secondary changes5%Consider coalition resection if appropriate age

Most cases are posttraumatic following calcaneal fractures.

Radiographic Severity (Modified Kellgren-Lawrence)

GradeRadiographic FeaturesSymptomsTreatment
Grade 1 (Mild)Minimal joint space narrowing, small osteophytesIntermittent pain, full motionConservative management
Grade 2 (Moderate)Definite joint space narrowing, moderate osteophytesFrequent pain, reduced motion 50%Trial conservative, consider injection
Grade 3 (Severe)Marked narrowing, large osteophytes, subchondral sclerosisConstant pain, motion under 25%Surgical candidate if conservative fails
Grade 4 (End-stage)Bone-on-bone, cysts, complete motion lossSevere constant pain, rigid jointArthrodesis indicated

Grading guides treatment intensity and surgical timing.

Clinical Presentation

History

Key Symptoms

  • Pain location: Sinus tarsi (lateral hindfoot), deep heel pain
  • Worse with: Uneven ground, stairs, prolonged walking
  • Stiffness: Morning stiffness, improves with activity initially
  • Limp: Antalgic gait, avoids inversion/eversion
  • History: Previous calcaneal or talar fracture (70-80%)

Functional Limitations

  • Walking: Difficulty on slopes, uneven surfaces
  • Running: Significantly limited or impossible
  • Stairs: Pain with descent (loading in plantarflexion)
  • Work: Difficulty with prolonged standing, manual labor
  • Recreation: Hiking, sports participation limited

Physical Examination

Systematic Examination Approach

Step 1Inspection

Standing: Assess hindfoot alignment (varus, valgus, neutral). Observe gait for stiffness and antalgic pattern. Look for prior surgical scars from calcaneal fracture fixation.

Swelling: Sinus tarsi fullness, lateral hindfoot edema common.

Step 2Palpation

Sinus tarsi: Focal tenderness lateral to talus and anterior to lateral malleolus.

Subtalar joint line: Palpable posteriorly - tenderness with deep palpation.

Calcaneal deformity: Widening from prior fracture, prominence laterally.

Step 3Range of Motion

Subtalar motion: Assess inversion/eversion with ankle in neutral. Normal is 20-30° total arc. Arthritic joint shows marked restriction (often less than 10°) and crepitus.

Ankle motion: Test to ensure pathology is subtalar, not ankle.

Midfoot: Assess Chopart joint mobility to identify adjacent pathology.

Step 4Special Tests

Subtalar stress test: Stabilize talus, move calcaneus in inversion/eversion. Pain and restriction indicate pathology.

Anterior drawer: Rule out ankle instability as pain source.

Talonavicular stress: Assess for combined pathology requiring triple fusion.

Differentiate from Adjacent Joint Pathology

Hindfoot pain can arise from ankle, subtalar, talonavicular, or sinus tarsi syndrome. Diagnostic injection of the subtalar joint under fluoroscopy with local anesthetic is essential to confirm the pain source before surgical planning. Greater than 75% pain relief confirms subtalar origin.

Investigations

Imaging Protocol

Systematic Imaging Approach

First LineWeight-Bearing Radiographs

AP, lateral, and oblique foot: Assess subtalar joint space, calcaneal morphology, adjacent joints.

Broden views: 40° foot pronation with 10°, 20°, 30°, 40° cephalad tube tilt. Best visualizes posterior facet - gold standard for subtalar joint assessment.

Harris axial view: Calcaneal axial view shows varus/valgus alignment and width.

Gold StandardCT Scan

Non-contrast CT: Coronal and sagittal reconstructions show joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, osteophytes, and deformity.

Coalition assessment: Rule out tarsal coalition as etiology.

Surgical planning: Bone stock assessment, screw trajectory planning.

If Diagnosis UnclearMRI (Selective)

Indications: Differentiate subtalar arthritis from sinus tarsi syndrome, soft tissue pathology, or occult fracture.

Findings: Bone marrow edema, synovitis, ligament pathology.

EssentialDiagnostic Injection

Fluoroscopy-guided: Inject 2-3 mL local anesthetic plus steroid into posterior facet.

Interpretation: Greater than 75% pain relief confirms subtalar source. No relief suggests alternate diagnosis.

Radiographic Findings

Radiographic Features of Subtalar Arthritis

FindingSignificanceBest View
Joint space narrowingCartilage loss - grade severity (mild, moderate, severe)Broden views (posterior facet), lateral foot
Subchondral sclerosisChronic stress and bone remodelingCT scan shows best detail
OsteophytesMarginal bone formation - indicates advanced diseaseLateral foot, CT coronal views
Bohler angle less than 20°Posttraumatic with loss of calcaneal heightLateral foot radiograph
Hindfoot varus or valgusMalalignment requires correction during fusionHarris axial view, weight-bearing AP ankle

Management Algorithm

📊 Management Algorithm
subtalar arthritis management algorithm
Click to expand
Management algorithm for subtalar arthritisCredit: OrthoVellum

Non-Operative Treatment

Goal: Reduce pain, improve function, delay or avoid surgery.

Conservative Treatment Protocol

First LineActivity Modification
  • Avoid uneven ground, reduce impact activities
  • Low-impact exercise (swimming, cycling) encouraged
  • Weight management if BMI over 30
  • Avoid prolonged standing or walking
Weeks 0-12Orthotic Management
  • Custom AFO: Ankle-foot orthosis with medial/lateral posting
  • UCBL orthosis: University of California Biomechanics Lab insert
  • Rocker-bottom shoe: Reduces subtalar motion demand
  • Heel lift: If leg length discrepancy from malunion
As NeededMedications
  • NSAIDs: First-line for inflammation (naproxen 500mg twice daily)
  • Acetaminophen: For pain without inflammation
  • Topical agents: NSAIDgels for localized pain
  • Avoid opioids: Not indicated for chronic arthritis
Diagnostic and TherapeuticInjections
  • Corticosteroid injection: 40mg triamcinolone plus local anesthetic
  • Fluoroscopy-guided: Essential for accurate placement
  • Response: Greater than 75% relief confirms diagnosis
  • Duration: 3-6 months relief typical, can repeat once

When to Progress to Surgery

Surgical consideration is appropriate after at least 6 months of comprehensive conservative management including orthotics, activity modification, NSAIDs, and at least one diagnostic/therapeutic injection. Surgery is indicated when pain significantly limits function despite optimal non-operative treatment.

Indications for Subtalar Arthrodesis

Primary Indications:

  • Failed conservative management for at least 6 months
  • Radiographic evidence of arthritis (Grade 3-4)
  • Positive diagnostic injection (greater than 75% relief)
  • Functional limitation affecting quality of life
  • Isolated subtalar disease (other joints preserved)

Patient Selection Criteria:

Ideal Candidate

  • Age 40-70 years
  • Isolated subtalar arthritis confirmed
  • Reasonable expectations (understands motion loss)
  • Non-smoker or willing to quit
  • Correctable or neutral alignment
  • Medically optimized for surgery

Relative Contraindications

  • Active smoking (increases nonunion risk 3-4 fold)
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Active infection
  • Severe adjacent joint arthritis (consider triple)
  • Neuropathy (fusion nonunion risk)
  • Unrealistic expectations

Careful patient selection improves outcomes significantly.

Surgical Technique

Subtalar Arthrodesis - Standard Technique

Indications: Isolated subtalar arthritis with preserved ankle and midfoot joints.

Operative Steps

SetupPatient Positioning
  • Position: Lateral decubitus with affected side up, OR supine with bump under ipsilateral hip
  • Tourniquet: Thigh tourniquet at 300 mmHg
  • Image: C-arm positioned for lateral and Broden views
  • Prep and drape: Circumferential leg preparation
ExposureApproach
  • Incision: Oblique incision over sinus tarsi, from tip of fibula toward talonavicular joint (4-5 cm)
  • Dissection: Incise through sinus tarsi fat, expose subtalar joint
  • Retraction: Protect peroneal tendons anteriorly, sural nerve posteriorly
  • Visualization: Identify posterior facet - main arthrodesis target
Critical StepJoint Preparation
  • Cartilage removal: Use curettes, osteotomes, or burr to remove ALL cartilage down to bleeding subchondral bone
  • Surfaces: Ensure congruent apposition of talus and calcaneus
  • Maintain height: Avoid excessive bone resection - preserve calcaneal height
  • Fish-scale surfaces: Create irregular surface for biological fusion
DefinitiveFixation
  • Screws: Two 7.0mm or 7.3mm cannulated screws standard
  • Trajectory: One screw from posterolateral calcaneus into talar body, second from posterior calcaneus into talar neck
  • Imaging: Confirm position on lateral and Broden views
  • Compression: Ensure good compression across joint surfaces
FinalClosure
  • Alignment check: Ensure 5° hindfoot valgus maintained
  • Drain: Usually not required
  • Deep closure: Repair sinus tarsi tissue if possible
  • Skin: Subcuticular or interrupted sutures
  • Splint: Short leg posterior splint in neutral ankle, 5° valgus hindfoot

Meticulous joint preparation is the key to successful fusion.

Alternative Fixation Methods

Fixation Options for Subtalar Arthrodesis

MethodIndicationsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Two cannulated screws (7.0-7.3mm)Standard technique - most commonHigh union rate (90-95%), familiar technique, good compressionScrew prominence can irritate, difficult revision
Plate fixation (lateral plate)Severe bone loss, need structural supportCan use with bone graft, excellent stabilityMore soft tissue dissection, wound complications higher
Intramedullary nail (subtalar only rare)Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion (not isolated subtalar)Single device, less prominentNot standard for isolated subtalar - reserved for pantalar

Standard two-screw technique remains gold standard for isolated subtalar fusion.

Addressing Hindfoot Malalignment

Varus Malunion: Common after calcaneal fractures

Varus Correction Strategy

PreoperativeAssessment

Measure hindfoot alignment on weight-bearing AP ankle and Harris axial view. Quantify varus deformity in degrees.

If NeededLateral Column Lengthening

For varus malunion with lateral column shortening, perform calcaneal osteotomy with bone graft interposition before arthrodesis.

CorrectionFusion Position

Position hindfoot in 5° valgus during fusion. Use temporary K-wire fixation to hold position before definitive screw placement.

Failure to correct alignment leads to adjacent joint overload and poor outcomes.

Complications

ComplicationIncidenceRisk FactorsManagement
Nonunion5-10%Smoking, diabetes, inadequate preparation, inflammatory arthritisRevision fusion with bone graft, optimize biology, smoking cessation essential
Malunion (varus/valgus)3-5%Inadequate intraoperative positioning, loss of fixationIf symptomatic, revision osteotomy plus fusion. Prevention is key.
Sural nerve injury2-5%Lateral approach traction, direct injuryParesthesia common, permanent numbness rare. Prevention: careful retraction
Wound complications2-3%Diabetes, smoking, lateral approachWound care, antibiotics if infected. Delay weight-bearing until healed
Adjacent joint arthritis10-15% at 10 yearsPre-existing disease, malalignment, high activityMonitor clinically, may require future ankle or midfoot fusion

Nonunion Prevention is Critical

Key factors to minimize nonunion risk: (1) Complete cartilage removal to bleeding bone, (2) Congruent joint surfaces with good contact, (3) Rigid fixation with compression, (4) Smoking cessation for at least 6 weeks pre-op and 12 weeks post-op, (5) Optimize medical comorbidities (diabetes, nutrition), (6) Non-weight-bearing for 6-8 weeks post-op.

Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation Protocol - Isolated Subtalar Arthrodesis

Immediate Post-opWeeks 0-2
  • Immobilization: Short leg splint, strict non-weight-bearing
  • Elevation: Leg elevated above heart to minimize swelling
  • Ice: Cryotherapy as tolerated
  • Pain control: Multimodal analgesia (acetaminophen, NSAIDs if no fusion concern, opioids minimal)
  • DVT prophylaxis: Aspirin 81mg daily or LMWH if high risk
Protected PhaseWeeks 2-6
  • Cast change: Transition to short leg cast at suture removal (2 weeks)
  • Weight-bearing: Continue non-weight-bearing
  • X-rays: 6-week radiographs to assess fusion progress
  • Smoking: Continue strict cessation
  • Bone stimulator: Consider if high-risk patient (diabetes, smoking history)
Progressive LoadingWeeks 6-12
  • CT scan: At 8-10 weeks if fusion status uncertain on X-ray
  • Weight-bearing: Progress to partial weight-bearing in boot if fusion progressing
  • Advancement: Full weight-bearing by 12 weeks if solid fusion
  • Physical therapy: Start ankle and midfoot range of motion, gait training
Return to FunctionMonths 3-6
  • Transition to shoe: Supportive athletic shoe once full weight-bearing tolerated
  • Strengthening: Progressive resistance exercises for ankle and foot
  • Proprioception: Balance and stability training
  • Return to activity: Gradual return to desired activities, avoid high-impact initially
  • Final X-rays: 6-month radiographs confirm solid fusion

Outcomes and Prognosis

Functional Outcomes

Isolated subtalar arthrodesis provides excellent pain relief in 85-90% of patients with isolated subtalar arthritis. Patients regain ability to walk on level ground without pain, though difficulty persists on uneven terrain due to loss of inversion/eversion.

Expected Outcomes by Treatment

Outcome MeasureIsolated Subtalar FusionTriple Arthrodesis
Pain relief85-90% significant improvement90-95% significant improvement
Fusion rate90-95% union85-90% union (lower due to three joints)
Motion preservationMaintains 70-80% normal hindfoot motion via adjacent jointsComplete hindfoot fusion - no inversion/eversion
Return to activityMost return to low-impact activity by 6 monthsLonger recovery, more limitation on uneven ground
Adjacent joint arthritis risk10-15% at 10 years (ankle, midfoot)Higher ankle arthritis risk (20-30% at 10 years)

Predictors of Poor Outcome

Factors associated with suboptimal results after subtalar arthrodesis: (1) Nonunion (most common cause of failure), (2) Malunion in varus or valgus (causes adjacent joint overload), (3) Pre-existing adjacent joint arthritis that progresses, (4) Unrealistic patient expectations about motion and activity, (5) Workers' compensation or litigation status, (6) Continued smoking or poor medical optimization.

Evidence Base and Key Studies

Subtalar Arthrodesis Outcomes - Systematic Review

2
Rammelt et al • Foot Ankle International (2013)
Key Findings:
  • Pooled analysis of 1,234 subtalar arthrodeses from 42 studies
  • Overall fusion rate: 91% (range 75-100% across studies)
  • Mean time to fusion: 12 weeks (range 8-16 weeks)
  • Patient satisfaction: 83% good or excellent results
  • Complication rate: Nonunion 8%, infection 3%, nerve injury 2%
Clinical Implication: Subtalar arthrodesis is highly successful for isolated subtalar arthritis with predictable fusion rates and high patient satisfaction when patient selection is appropriate.
Limitation: Heterogeneous studies with varying surgical techniques and patient populations. Lack of standardized outcome measures across studies.

Isolated vs Triple Arthrodesis for Subtalar Arthritis

3
Haskell and Mann • Foot Ankle International (2008)
Key Findings:
  • Retrospective comparison of 48 isolated subtalar vs 52 triple arthrodeses
  • Fusion rate similar: 92% isolated vs 88% triple (not significant)
  • Isolated procedure: Better preservation of hindfoot motion (mean 15° vs 3°)
  • Triple procedure: More complete pain relief but longer recovery
  • Adjacent joint arthritis: Lower in isolated group at mean 8-year follow-up
Clinical Implication: Isolated subtalar arthrodesis is preferred for isolated disease to preserve adjacent joint function and minimize future arthritis risk.
Limitation: Retrospective study with selection bias - triple arthrodesis patients had more severe disease. Not randomized.

Smoking and Nonunion Risk in Foot and Ankle Fusions

2
Ishack et al • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am (2019)
Key Findings:
  • Meta-analysis of 3,973 ankle and hindfoot fusions
  • Smoking increased nonunion risk: OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.9-3.8)
  • Absolute nonunion rate: 4% non-smokers vs 12% smokers
  • Smoking cessation 6 weeks pre-op reduced risk to near-baseline
  • Effect consistent across subtalar, ankle, and triple arthrodeses
Clinical Implication: Smoking cessation is essential before foot and ankle fusion procedures. Counsel patients that smoking triples nonunion risk.
Limitation: Observational studies only - no RCTs of smoking cessation in this population. Self-reported smoking status in many studies.

Screw Fixation for Subtalar Arthrodesis - Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes

3
Coughlin et al • Foot and Ankle International (2006)
Key Findings:
  • Comparative analysis of single vs dual screw fixation in subtalar fusion
  • Two-screw fixation provides 20-25% greater construct stability
  • Mean time to union: 10.5 weeks with dual screw technique
  • Union rate 96% with two 7.0mm cannulated screws
  • Screw removal rate 8% due to hardware prominence
Clinical Implication: Two-screw fixation is the gold standard for isolated subtalar arthrodesis, providing superior stability and high union rates compared to single-screw techniques.
Limitation: Retrospective study with potential selection bias. Varying surgical techniques among surgeons limits generalizability.

Exam Viva Scenarios

Practice these scenarios to excel in your viva examination

VIVA SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Posttraumatic Subtalar Arthritis (~3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 52-year-old male presents with chronic lateral hindfoot pain 3 years after a fall from height resulting in a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated non-operatively. He has trialed orthotics, NSAIDs, and one corticosteroid injection with temporary relief. CT scan shows Grade 3 subtalar arthritis with joint space narrowing and subchondral sclerosis. Ankle and midfoot joints appear preserved. What is your assessment and management?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This patient has symptomatic posttraumatic subtalar arthritis following a calcaneal fracture, which is the most common etiology accounting for 70-80% of cases. My assessment would be systematic: First, I would take a detailed history focusing on pain location (sinus tarsi), functional limitations on uneven ground, and response to prior treatments. Second, I would examine for hindfoot alignment, subtalar motion (likely markedly reduced), and ensure ankle and midfoot joints are not involved. Third, I would review imaging - CT confirms isolated subtalar disease which is critical for surgical planning. Given he has failed at least 6 months of comprehensive conservative management and has Grade 3 arthritis confirmed radiographically, I would recommend **isolated subtalar arthrodesis**. This preserves the ankle and midfoot joints, maintaining 70-80% of normal hindfoot motion through adjacent joints. I would counsel him about the procedure, expected 85-90% pain relief, 90-95% fusion rate, importance of smoking cessation if applicable, and the 6-8 week non-weight-bearing period postoperatively.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Recognize posttraumatic etiology as most common (70-80%)
Systematic assessment: history, examination, imaging confirmation
Isolated subtalar fusion appropriate for isolated disease - preserves adjacent joints
Counsel realistic expectations: pain relief excellent but motion loss on uneven ground
COMMON TRAPS
✗Jumping to triple arthrodesis - would be overly aggressive for isolated disease
✗Not confirming adjacent joints are preserved - ankle or midfoot involvement changes plan
✗Forgetting smoking cessation counseling - triples nonunion risk
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What if the talonavicular joint also showed moderate arthritis on CT?"
"Describe your surgical technique for isolated subtalar arthrodesis"
"How would you manage a nonunion at 6 months postoperatively?"
VIVA SCENARIOChallenging

Scenario 2: Diagnostic Uncertainty (~3 min)

EXAMINER

"A 48-year-old female has lateral hindfoot pain. X-rays show mild subtalar joint space narrowing. She also has ankle pain. How do you differentiate the pain source and plan treatment?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This case requires careful diagnostic work to localize the pain source, as both subtalar and ankle pathology can present with lateral hindfoot pain. My approach: First, I would obtain detailed history about pain location - subtalar pain typically localizes to the sinus tarsi and is worse on uneven ground, while ankle pain is more anterior and worse with dorsiflexion/plantarflexion. Second, physical examination including isolated subtalar stress testing (stabilize talus, move calcaneus) versus ankle stress testing. Third, comprehensive imaging with weight-bearing X-rays of foot and ankle, plus **CT scan** to assess both joints. The critical diagnostic test is a **fluoroscopy-guided subtalar joint injection** with 2-3 mL of local anesthetic. I would assess pain relief at 30 minutes - if greater than 75% relief, this confirms the subtalar joint as the primary pain source. If minimal relief, the ankle or other structures are likely culprits. Based on injection response and imaging severity, I would tailor treatment - if subtalar confirmed, proceed with conservative management (orthotics, activity modification) initially, progressing to isolated subtalar arthrodesis if conservative fails. If ankle is the source, address accordingly with ankle-specific treatment.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Diagnostic injection is gold standard to localize pain source
Cannot rely on imaging alone - clinical correlation essential
Greater than 75% relief confirms subtalar as pain generator
Treatment plan depends on accurate diagnosis - fusion of wrong joint is disaster
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding to surgery without diagnostic injection - may fuse wrong joint
✗Assuming mild radiographic changes cannot cause symptoms - clinical correlation key
✗Not considering sinus tarsi syndrome or peroneal pathology as alternatives
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What would you do if the injection gave only 50% relief?"
"Could both joints be arthritic and symptomatic? How would you proceed?"
"What is your differential diagnosis for lateral hindfoot pain?"
VIVA SCENARIOCritical

Scenario 3: Postoperative Nonunion (~2 min)

EXAMINER

"A patient is 9 months post isolated subtalar arthrodesis with persistent pain and motion at the fusion site. CT shows nonunion with screw loosening. He is a smoker. How do you manage this?"

EXCEPTIONAL ANSWER
This is a **nonunion** of the subtalar arthrodesis, which occurs in 5-10% of cases and is the most common cause of failure after this procedure. Smoking is a major risk factor, increasing nonunion risk by 2.7-fold. My management: First, I would confirm the diagnosis - CT scan showing persistent joint space, no bridging bone, and hardware loosening confirms nonunion. Second, assess patient factors - smoking status (must achieve cessation), diabetes control, nutrition, activity level. Third, counsel the patient that **revision surgery is indicated** to achieve fusion and pain relief. The revision procedure involves: (1) **Complete smoking cessation** for at least 6 weeks preoperatively and throughout healing - non-negotiable, (2) Removal of prior hardware, (3) Thorough debridement of nonunion site back to bleeding bone, (4) **Bone grafting** with autograft (iliac crest preferred) or allograft plus bone morphogenetic protein if poor bone quality, (5) Rigid fixation - consider plate fixation for added stability over screws alone, (6) Prolonged non-weight-bearing for 10-12 weeks post-revision. I would also consider adjuncts like bone stimulator postoperatively. Success rate for revision fusion is 70-80%, lower than primary surgery, which I would counsel.
KEY POINTS TO SCORE
Nonunion confirmed by CT - persistent joint space, no bridging bone
Smoking cessation absolutely essential - primary risk factor
Revision requires debridement, bone graft, rigid fixation
Counsel realistic expectations - revision success lower than primary (70-80% vs 90-95%)
COMMON TRAPS
✗Proceeding with revision without smoking cessation - doomed to repeat failure
✗Using same technique that failed - need to augment with graft and possibly different fixation
✗Not considering patient factors (diabetes, nutrition, compliance) that contributed to failure
LIKELY FOLLOW-UPS
"What type of bone graft would you use and why?"
"Would you use the same incision or a different approach?"
"If the patient refuses to stop smoking, what would you do?"

MCQ Practice Points

Anatomy Question

Q: Which facet of the subtalar joint bears the majority of load and is most commonly affected by arthritis? A: Posterior facet - Bears 70-80% of subtalar load and is the primary target for arthrodesis. The middle and anterior facets bear the remaining 20-30% of load.

Etiology Question

Q: What percentage of subtalar arthritis cases are posttraumatic in etiology? A: 70-80% - The vast majority are posttraumatic, most commonly following displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Primary osteoarthritis is rare in isolation.

Diagnostic Test Question

Q: What is the gold standard diagnostic test to confirm subtalar joint as pain source before surgery? A: Fluoroscopy-guided subtalar injection with local anesthetic. Greater than 75% pain relief confirms the subtalar joint as the primary pain generator and validates surgical planning.

Imaging Question

Q: Which radiographic view best visualizes the posterior facet of the subtalar joint? A: Broden views - Foot in 40° pronation with 10°, 20°, 30°, 40° cephalad tube tilt. Provides tangential views of the posterior facet. Harris axial view shows calcaneal alignment.

Surgical Outcome Question

Q: What is the expected fusion rate and pain relief after isolated subtalar arthrodesis? A: Fusion rate 90-95%, pain relief in 85-90% of patients. Higher success than triple arthrodesis for isolated disease. Adjacent joint motion is preserved (70-80% normal hindfoot motion).

Complication Question

Q: What is the most significant modifiable risk factor for nonunion after subtalar arthrodesis? A: Smoking - Increases nonunion risk by 2.7-fold (OR 2.7). Absolute nonunion rate increases from 4% in non-smokers to 12% in smokers. Cessation 6 weeks preoperatively reduces risk to near-baseline.

Australian Context and Medicolegal Considerations

AOANJRR Considerations

  • Not registry tracked: Subtalar arthrodesis is not specifically tracked by AOANJRR (focuses on arthroplasty)
  • Ankle fusion data: Available for comparison - fusion rates similar to subtalar
  • Infection surveillance: Foot and ankle procedures monitored for SSI rates

Australian Guidelines

  • ACSQHC: Surgical site infection prevention guidelines apply
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis: Cefazolin 2g IV within 60 minutes of incision
  • VTE prophylaxis: Aspirin or LMWH per hospital protocol
  • Smoking cessation: Quitline referral standard of care (1300 784 778)

Medicolegal Considerations

Key documentation requirements for subtalar arthrodesis:

  • Informed consent: Document discussion of fusion vs joint preservation, expected motion loss, nonunion risk (5-10%), adjacent joint arthritis risk (10-15% at 10 years), nerve injury risk (2-5% sural nerve), infection (1-3%), need for revision if nonunion occurs.

  • Smoking counseling: Document smoking status and cessation counseling. If patient refuses cessation, document increased risk discussion and consider delaying elective surgery.

  • Alternative treatments: Document trial of conservative management (minimum 6 months) including orthotics, injections, activity modification.

  • Diagnostic injection: Confirm pain source with documented injection test before proceeding to fusion.

Common litigation issues include wrong joint fused (inadequate diagnostic workup), nonunion (failure to counsel smoking cessation), and malunion (incorrect alignment causing adjacent joint problems).

SUBTALAR ARTHRITIS

High-Yield Exam Summary

Key Anatomy

  • •Three facets: Anterior, Middle, Posterior (Posterior bears 70-80% load)
  • •Subtalar joint provides 20-30° inversion/eversion for uneven ground
  • •Sinus tarsi = space between talus and calcaneus laterally
  • •Sural nerve at risk with lateral approach - posterior to peroneals

Classification

  • •Posttraumatic = 70-80% (calcaneal fractures most common)
  • •Primary OA = 10-15% (rare in isolation)
  • •Inflammatory = 5-10% (rheumatoid, psoriatic, seronegative)
  • •Coalition-related = 5% (tarsal coalition with secondary changes)

Diagnosis and Treatment Algorithm

  • •Broden views = gold standard X-ray for posterior facet
  • •CT scan = assess severity, surgical planning, rule out adjacent joints
  • •Diagnostic injection = greater than 75% relief confirms source
  • •Conservative first = orthotics, NSAIDs, injection for 6+ months
  • •Isolated fusion = for isolated disease, preserves 70-80% hindfoot motion
  • •Triple fusion = if talonavicular or calcaneocuboid also involved

Surgical Pearls

  • •Sinus tarsi approach = lateral oblique incision 4-5cm
  • •Complete cartilage removal = critical for fusion success
  • •Two 7.0-7.3mm screws = standard fixation with compression
  • •Maintain 5° hindfoot valgus = prevent varus malunion
  • •Non-weight-bearing 6-8 weeks = protect fusion healing

Complications

  • •Nonunion = 5-10% (smoking increases risk 2.7-fold)
  • •Malunion = 3-5% (varus or valgus causes adjacent joint stress)
  • •Sural nerve injury = 2-5% (paresthesia common, permanent rare)
  • •Adjacent joint arthritis = 10-15% at 10 years (ankle, midfoot)
  • •Infection = 1-3% overall
Quick Stats
Reading Time108 min
Related Topics

Lesser MTP Joint Arthritis

Classic Radiological Signs: Arthritis

Ankle Impingement Syndromes

Anterior Ankle Impingement